Submitted:
08 March 2025
Posted:
10 March 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Experimental Methods
3. Results
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
References
- F. Xing, S. Li, D.D. Yin, et al. Recent progress in Mg-based alloys as a novel bioabsorbable biomaterials for orthopedic applications. Journal of Magnesium and Alloys, 2022, 10: 1428-1456. [CrossRef]
- B. Kim, C.H. Hong, J.C. Kim, et al. Factors affecting the grain refinement of extruded Mg-6Zn-0.5Zr alloy by Ca addition. Scripta Materialia, 2020, 187: 24-29. [CrossRef]
- D. Zhao, X. Chen, W. Ci, et al. Effect of Al element on microstructure, mechanical properties and damping capacity of LPSO-containing Mg-Y-Zn-Li alloy. Materials Characterization, 2024, 207: 113542. [CrossRef]
- R.X. Liu, W. Zhao, G.L. Wu, et al. A high-performance TRIP Mg-Sc-Zn alloy enhanced by fine grain strengthening and nano-precipitate strengthening. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2024, 33: 3874-3881. [CrossRef]
- H. Ovri, J. Markmann, J. Barthel, et al. Mechanistic origin of the enhanced strength and ductility in Mg-rare earth alloys. Acta Materialia, 2023, 224: 118550. [CrossRef]
- Y. Ogawa, D. Ando, Y. Sutou, et al. A lightweight shape-memory magnesium alloy. Science, 2016, 353 (6297): 368-370. [CrossRef]
- K. Yamagishi, Y. Ogawa, D. Ando, Y.J. Sutou. Adjustable room temperature deformation behavior of Mg-Sc alloy: From superelasticity to slip deformation via TRIP effect. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2023, 931: 167507. [CrossRef]
- D. Ando, Y. Ogawa, T. Suzuki, et al. Age-hardening effect by phase transformation of high Sc containing Mg alloy. Materials Letters, 2015, 161: 5-8. [CrossRef]
- Y. Ogawa, D. Ando, Y. Sutou, et al. Aging Effect of Mg-Sc Alloy with α+β Two-Phase Microstructure. Materials Transactions, 2016, 57 (7): 1119-1123. [CrossRef]
- Y. Ogawa, D. Ando, Y. Sutou,et al. Determination of α/β phase boundaries and mechanical characterization of Mg-Sc binary alloys. Materials Science & Engineering A, 2016, 670: 335-341. [CrossRef]
- Y. Ogawa, A. Singh, H. Somekawa. Activation of non-basal <c+a> slip incoarse-grained Mg-Sc alloy. Scripta Materialia, 2022, 218: 114830. [CrossRef]
- C. Xu, J.F. Wang, C. Wang, et al. Martensitic transformation behavior during tensile testing at room temperature in β-type Mg-35 wt%Sc alloy. Materials Science & Engineering: A, 2023, 865: 144602. [CrossRef]
- Z.M. Li, K.G. Pradeep, Y. Deng, et al. Metastable high-entropy dual-phase alloys overcome the strength-ductility trade-off. Nature, 2016, 534: 227-230. [CrossRef]
- Y.T. Zhu, X.L. Wu. Perspective on hetero-deformation induced (HDI) hardening and back stress. Materials Research Letters, 2019, 7: 393. [CrossRef]
- X.L. Wu, M.X. Yang, F.P. Yuan, et al. Heterogeneous lamella structure unites ultrafine-grain strength with coarse-grain ductility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015, 112: 14501. [CrossRef]
- H. Wang, D.T. Zhang, C. Qiu, et al. Achieving superior strength-ductility synergy in a heterostructured magnesium alloy via low-temperature extrusion and low-temperature annealing. Journal of Materials Science & Technology, 2023, 163: 32-44. [CrossRef]
- K. Yamagishi, D. Ando, Y. Sutou, Y. Ogawa. Texture formation through thermomechanical treatment and its effect on superelasticity in Mg-Sc shape memory alloy. Materials Transactions, 2020, 61: 2270-2275. [CrossRef]
- Y. Ogawa, D. Ando, Y. Sutou, J. Koike. Texture randomization of hexagonal close packed phase through hexagonal close packed/body centered cubic phase transformation in Mg-Sc alloy. Scripta Materialia, 2017, 128: 27-31. [CrossRef]
- L. Romero-Resendiz, M. El-Tahawy, T. Zhang, et al. Heterostructured stainless steel: Properties, current trends, and future perspectives. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports, 2022, 150: 100691. [CrossRef]
- L. Lu, H.Z. Zhao. Research Progress on Strengthening and Toughening Mechanisms of Heterogeneous Nanostructured Metals. Acta Metallurgica Sinica, 2022, 58(11): 1360-1370. [CrossRef]






| Annealing temperature (°C) | YS (MPa) | UTS (MPa) | EL (%) |
| 500 | 308.6 | 350 | 12.7 |
| 550 | 289.3 | 335 | 16.1 |
| 600 | 280.1 | 329 | 20.5 |
| Annealing temperature (°C) | Volume fraction of α phase (%) | Grain size of α phase (μm) | Volume fraction of β phase (%) | Grain size of β phase (μm) |
| 500 | 94.8 | 6.1 | 5.2 | 4.5 |
| 550 | 65.3 | 8.3 | 34.7 | 6.6 |
| 600 | 20 | 5.9 | 80 | 30.1 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).