Submitted:
01 March 2025
Posted:
03 March 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Fundamentals of Image Processing in Oncology
2.1. Image Preprocessing Methods: Noise Reduction, Artifact Elimination, and Normalization
2.2. Segmentation of Anatomical Structures and Tumors
2.3. Feature Extraction: Texture, Shape, Intensity, and Higher-Order Features
2.4. Image Registration: Aligning Multimodal Images for Comprehensive Analysis
3. Pattern Recognition Techniques in Cancer Analysis
4. Applications in Cancer Detection
5. Applications in Cancer Prediction
6. Applications in Cancer Diagnosis
7. Integration with Multimodal Data
8. Role of Explainable AI in Cancer Imaging
9. The Impact of 3D and 4D Imaging in Oncology
10. Role of Mobile and Cloud-Based AI Solutions
11. Application of Nanotechnology in Cancer Imaging
12. Ethical Considerations and Societal Implications
13. Role of Open-Source Tools and Frameworks in Cancer Imaging Research
13.1. Popular Open-Source Tools for Cancer Image Analysis
13.1.1. TensorFlow
13.1.2. PyTorch
13.1.3. MONAI (Medical Open Network for AI)
13.1.4. ITK (Insight Toolkit)
13.1.5. Public Datasets and Repositories
13.1.6. Collaborative Platforms
14. Human-AI Collaboration in Cancer Care
15. Economic and Accessibility Implications of AI in Cancer Imaging
16. Emerging Imaging Modalities and Their Integration with AI
17. Challenges and Limitations
18. Future Directions and Innovations
19. Case Studies and Practical Implementations

| Technique | Description | Applications in Cancer Detection | Advantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) | Uses strong magnetic fields and radio waves to generate detailed images of organs and tissues. | Detection of brain, breast, and prostate cancers. | Non-invasive, high-resolution images. |
| CT (Computed Tomography) | X-ray technique that produces cross-sectional images of the body. | Detection of lung, liver, and colorectal cancers. | Quick, widely available, high sensitivity. |
| PET (Positron Emission Tomography) | Combines imaging with radioactive tracers to detect cancerous tissues. | Detection of metabolic activity in various cancers. | High specificity for metabolic changes. |
| Ultrasound Imaging | Uses sound waves to create images of internal body structures. | Detection of breast, liver, and ovarian cancers. | Safe, real-time, and cost-effective. |
| Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) | Non-invasive imaging method using light waves to capture tissue microstructures. | Used in detecting early-stage skin, oral, and breast cancers. | High-resolution, real-time imaging. |

| Algorithm | Description | Applications in Cancer Diagnosis | Advantages |
| Support Vector Machines (SVM) | A supervised learning algorithm for classification and regression. | Identifying cancer types from histopathological images. | High accuracy, effective in high-dimensional spaces. |
| Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) | Computational models inspired by biological neural networks, capable of pattern recognition | Classification of mammogram images for breast cancer. | Can learn complex patterns, adaptive. |
| Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) | A deep learning algorithm primarily used for image processing, especially in medical imaging. | Tumor detection in medical images (e.g., CT, MRI). | Highly effective in image classification and detection. |
| Random Forests | Ensemble learning method for classification, using multiple decision trees. | Classifying cancerous vs non-cancerous tissues. | Robust, handles large datasets well. |
| K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) | A non-parametric classification algorithm that classifies based on the closest feature matches. | Cancerous tissue identification in biopsies. | Simple, interpretable, and effective in smaller datasets. |

| Technique | Application | Advantages | Challenges |
|---|---|---|---|
| Survival Analysis Models | Predicting patient outcomes from imaging | Integrates imaging data with clinical variables; improves prognosis accuracy | Requires longitudinal data; complex to implement |
| Tumor Growth Modeling | Simulating tumor progression over time | Helps in understanding disease dynamics; aids in treatment planning | Relies on assumptions; may not account for all biological variables |
| Biomarker Identification | Linking imaging features to biomarkers | Non-invasive; aids in monitoring treatment response | Limited by imaging resolution; requires validation |
| AI-Driven Prognostic Tools | Predicting recurrence and survival rates | Provides personalized prognosis; improves patient management | Ethical concerns; requires integration with clinical workflows |
| Multimodal Fusion | Combining imaging with genomic data | Enhances prognosis accuracy; provides holistic view of disease | Data integration challenges; requires advanced computational methods |
20. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, Colombet M, Mery L, Piñeros M, et al. Global cancer observatory: cancer today. Lyon: International agency for research on cancer. 2020;20182020.
- Zhang, B.; Shi, H.; Wang, H. Machine Learning and AI in Cancer Prognosis, Prediction, and Treatment Selection: A Critical Approach. Vol. 16, Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. Dove Medical Press Ltd.; 2023. p. 1779–91.
- Higgins, L.J.; Pomper, M.G. The evolution of imaging in cancer: Current state and future challenges. Semin Oncol. 2011, 38, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Bera, K.; Braman, N.; Gupta, A.; Velcheti, V.; Madabhushi, A. Predicting cancer outcomes with radiomics and artificial intelligence in radiology. Vol. 19, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology. Nature Research; 2022. p. 132–46.
- Abut, S.; Okut, H.; Kallail, K.J. Paradigm shift from Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) to deep Convolutional Neural Networks (DCNNs) in the field of medical image processing. Expert Syst Appl. 2024, 244, 122983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, T.; Zhan, X. Pattern recognition for predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine in cancer. Vol. 8, EPMA Journal. BioMed Central Ltd.; 2017. p. 51–60.
- Frangioni, J.V. New technologies for human cancer imaging. Vol. 26, Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2008. p. 4012–21.
- Passaro A, Al Bakir M, Hamilton EG, Diehn M, André F, Roy-Chowdhuri S, et al. Cancer biomarkers: Emerging trends and clinical implications for personalized treatment. Vol. 187, Cell. Elsevier B.V.; 2024. p. 1617–35.
- Mohammadzadeh, Z.; Safdari, R.; Ghazisaeidi, M.; Davoodi, S.; Azadmanjir, Z. Advances in optimal detection of cancer by image processing; experience with lung and breast cancers. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention 2015, 16, 5613–8. [Google Scholar]
- Masoudi S, Harmon SA, Mehralivand S, Walker SM, Raviprakash H, Bagci U, et al. Quick guide on radiology image pre-processing for deep learning applications in prostate cancer research. Journal of Medical Imaging 2021, 8. [Google Scholar]
- Duffy BA, Zhao L, Sepehrband F, Min J, Wang DJ, Shi Y, et al. Retrospective motion artifact correction of structural MRI images using deep learning improves the quality of cortical surface reconstructions. Neuroimage 2021, 230. [Google Scholar]
- Ma, J.; He, Y.; Li, F.; Han, L.; You, C.; Wang, B. Segment anything in medical images. Nat Commun 2024, 15, 654. [Google Scholar]
- Alam MS, Rahman MM, Hossain MA, Islam MK, Ahmed KM, Ahmed KT, et al. Automatic human brain tumor detection in MRI image using template-based K means and improved fuzzy C means clustering algorithm. Big Data and Cognitive Computing 2019, 3, 27. [Google Scholar]
- Leymarie, F.; Levine, M.D. Tracking deformable objects in the plane using an active contour model. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1993, 15, 617–34. [Google Scholar]
- Yin XX, Sun L, Fu Y, Lu R, Zhang Y. [Retracted] U-Net-Based Medical Image Segmentation. J Healthc Eng 2022, 2022, 4189781. [Google Scholar]
- Kode, H.; Barkana, B.D. Deep Learning- and Expert Knowledge-Based Feature Extraction and Performance Evaluation in Breast Histopathology Images. Cancers (Basel) 2023, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arthur LE, McMann AH, Slattery LN, Fuhrman GM, Mackey AM, Rivere AE, et al. Factors That Predict Biological Aggressiveness in Estrogen Receptor–Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative/Lymph Node–Negative Breast Cancer. Ochsner Journal 2020, 20, 381–7. [Google Scholar]
- Rong Y, Rosu-Bubulac M, Benedict SH, Cui Y, Ruo R, Connell T, et al. Rigid and Deformable Image Registration for Radiation Therapy: A Self-Study Evaluation Guide for NRG Oncology Clinical Trial Participation. Pract Radiat Oncol 2021, 11, 282–98. [Google Scholar]
- Shekarian T, Valsesia-Wittmann S, Brody J, Michallet MC, Depil S, Caux C, et al. Pattern recognition receptors: immune targets to enhance cancer immunotherapy. Annals of Oncology 2017, 28, 1756–66. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, S.; Nianguang, C.A.I.; Penzuti Pacheco, P.; Narandes, S.; Wang, Y.; Wayne, X.U. Applications of support vector machine (SVM) learning in cancer genomics. Vol. 15, Cancer Genomics and Proteomics. International Institute of Anticancer Research; 2018. p. 41–51.
- Jiang, X.; Hu, Z.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Y. Deep Learning for Medical Image-Based Cancer Diagnosis. Vol. 15, Cancers. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI); 2023.
- Zanjani FG, Panteli A, Zinger S, van der Sommen F, Tan T, Balluff B, et al. Cancer detection in mass spectrometry imaging data by recurrent neural networks. In: 2019 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2019). IEEE; 2019. p. 674–8.
- Ayana, G.; Dese, K.; Choe, S.W. Transfer learning in breast cancer diagnoses via ultrasound imaging. Vol. 13, Cancers. MDPI AG; 2021. p. 1–16.
- Chen, W.; Tan, X.; Zhang, J.; Du, G.; Fu, Q.; Jiang, H. A robust approach for multi-type classification of brain tumor using deep feature fusion. Front Neurosci. 2024, 18. [Google Scholar]
- Mohammed, M.; Mwambi, H.; Mboya, I.B.; Elbashir, M.K.; Omolo, B. A stacking ensemble deep learning approach to cancer type classification based on TCGA data. Sci Rep 2021, 11. [Google Scholar]
- Kolla, L.; Parikh, R.B. Uses and limitations of artificial intelligence for oncology. Vol. 130, Cancer. John Wiley and Sons Inc; 2024. p. 2101–7.
- da Silva HEC, Santos GNM, Leite AF, Mesquita CRM, de Souza Figueiredo PT, Stefani CM, et al. The use of artificial intelligence tools in cancer detection compared to the traditional diagnostic imaging methods: An overview of the systematic reviews. PLoS One 2023, 18. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, C.; Helwig, E.J. The role of AI technology in prediction, diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer. Artif Intell Rev 2022, 55, 323–43. [Google Scholar]
- Gillies, R.J.; Schabath, M.B. Radiomics improves cancer screening and early detection. Vol. 29, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention. American Association for Cancer Research Inc.; 2020. p. 2556–67.
- Zeng, A.; Houssami, N.; Noguchi, N.; Nickel, B.; Marinovich, M.L. Frequency and characteristics of errors by artificial intelligence (AI) in reading screening mammography: a systematic review. Vol. 207, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. Springer; 2024. p. 1–13.
- Vickers, A.J. Prediction models in cancer care. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011, 61, 315–26. [Google Scholar]
- Cellina M, Cacioppa LM, Cè M, Chiarpenello V, Costa M, Vincenzo Z, et al. Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer Screening: The Future Is Now. Vol. 15, Cancers. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI); 2023.
- Chen H, Lan X, Yu T, Li L, Tang S, Liu S, et al. Development and validation of a radiogenomics model to predict axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer integrating MRI with transcriptome data: A multicohort study. Front Oncol 2022, 12. [Google Scholar]
- Jia LL, Zheng QY, Tian JH, He DL, Zhao JX, Zhao LP, et al. Artificial intelligence with magnetic resonance imaging for prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Vol. 12, Frontiers in Oncology. Frontiers Media S.A.; 2022.
- Lo Gullo R, Marcus E, Huayanay J, Eskreis-Winkler S, Thakur S, Teuwen J, et al. Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Breast MRI: Applications in Breast Cancer Primary Treatment Response Assessment and Prediction. Vol. 59, Investigative Radiology. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2024. p. 230–42.
- Komura, D.; Ochi, M.; Ishikawa, S. Machine learning methods for histopathological image analysis: Updates in 2024. Comput Struct Biotechnol J [Internet]. 2025, 27, 383–400. [Google Scholar]
- Hunter, B.; Hindocha, S.; Lee, R.W. The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Early Cancer Diagnosis. Cancers (Basel) 2022, 14. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar Y, Shrivastav S, Garg K, Modi N, Wiltos K, Woźniak M, et al. Automating cancer diagnosis using advanced deep learning techniques for multi-cancer image classification. Sci Rep [Internet] 2024, 14, 25006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Douglas, D.B.; Wilke, C.A.; Gibson, J.D.; Boone, J.M.; Wintermark, M. Augmented reality: Advances in diagnostic imaging. Vol. 1, Multimodal Technologies and Interaction. MDPI AG; 2017.
- Tharmaseelan H, Hertel A, Rennebaum S, Nörenberg D, Haselmann V, Schoenberg SO, et al. The Potential and Emerging Role of Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers for Cancer Characterization. Cancers. 2022, 14. [Google Scholar]
- Li Y, Dou Y, Da Veiga Leprevost F, Geffen Y, Calinawan AP, Aguet F, et al. Proteogenomic data and resources for pan-cancer analysis. Cancer Cell [Internet] 2023, 41, 1397–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heo, Y.J.; Hwa, C.; Lee, G.H.; Park, J.M.; An, J.Y. Integrative multi-omics approaches in cancer research: From biological networks to clinical subtypes. Mol Cells 2021, 44, 433–43. [Google Scholar]
- Boehm, K.M.; Khosravi, P.; Vanguri, R.; Gao, J.; Shah, S.P. Harnessing multimodal data integration to advance precision oncology. Vol. 22, Nature Reviews Cancer. Nature Research; 2022, 114–26.
- Alkhalaf S, Alturise F, Bahaddad AA, Elnaim BME, Shabana S, Abdel-Khalek S, et al. Adaptive Aquila Optimizer with Explainable Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Cancer Diagnosis on Medical Imaging. Cancers (Basel) 2023, 15. [Google Scholar]
- Smiley, A.; Reategui-Rivera, C.M.; Villarreal-Zegarra, D.; Escobar-Agreda, S.; Finkelstein, J. Exploring Artificial Intelligence Biases in Predictive Models for Cancer Diagnosis. Vol. 17, Cancers. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI); 2025.
- Talaat, F.M.; Gamel, S.A.; El-Balka, R.M.; Shehata, M.; ZainEldin, H. Grad-CAM Enabled Breast Cancer Classification with a 3D Inception-ResNet V2: Empowering Radiologists with Explainable Insights. Cancers (Basel) 2024, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Husby, U.E. Exploring Breast Cancer Diagnosis: A Study of SHAP and LIME in XAI-Driven Medical Imaging.
- Amann, J.; Blasimme, A.; Vayena, E.; Frey, D.; Madai, V.I. Explainability for artificial intelligence in healthcare: a multidisciplinary perspective. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2020, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Ineveld RL, van Vliet EJ, Wehrens EJ, Alieva M, Rios AC. 3D imaging for driving cancer discovery. EMBO J 2022, 41. [Google Scholar]
- Keall, P. 4-dimensional computed tomography imaging and treatment planning. Semin Radiat Oncol [Internet] 2004, 14, 81–90. [Google Scholar]
- Bi WL, Hosny A, Schabath MB, Giger ML, Birkbak NJ, Mehrtash A, et al. Artificial intelligence in cancer imaging: Clinical challenges and applications. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019, 69, 127–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cabral, B.P.; Braga, L.A.M.; Syed-Abdul, S.; Mota, F.B. Future of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Cancer Care: A Global Cross-Sectional Survey of Researchers. Current Oncology 2023, 30, 3432–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Capobianco, E. High-dimensional role of AI and machine learning in cancer research. Vol. 126, British Journal of Cancer. Springer Nature; 2022. p. 523–32.
- Ghaneiyan M, Farjami P, Mehran H, Mohammadzadeh S, Ghaderi S, Niakan Y, et al. AI-Enhanced Virtual Clinics and Telemedicine for Cancer Treatment. 2024.
- Chapman S, Dobrovolskaia M, Farahani K, Goodwin A, Joshi A, Lee H, et al. Nanoparticles for cancer imaging: The good, the bad, and the promise. Nano Today 2013, 8, 454–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCarthy, J.R.; Bhaumik, J.; Karver, M.R.; Sibel Erdem, S.; Weissleder, R. Targeted nanoagents for the detection of cancers. Vol. 4, Molecular Oncology. John Wiley and Sons Ltd.; 2010. p. 511–28.
- Soltani M, Kashkooli FM, Souri M, Harofte SZ, Harati T, Khadem A, et al. Enhancing clinical translation of cancer using nanoinformatics. Cancers 2021, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Far, B.F. Artificial intelligence ethics in precision oncology: balancing advancements in technology with patient privacy and autonomy. Explor Target Antitumor Ther 2023, 4, 685–9. [Google Scholar]
- Ziller A, Mueller TT, Stieger S, Feiner LF, Brandt J, Braren R, et al. Reconciling privacy and accuracy in AI for medical imaging. Nat Mach Intell 2024, 6, 764–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hantel A, Clancy DD, Kehl KL, Marron JM, Eliezer ;, Van Allen M, et al. A Process Framework for Ethically Deploying Artificial Intelligence in Oncology [Internet]. 2022.
- Urban T, Ziegler E, Lewis R, Hafey C, Sadow C, Van Den Abbeele AD, et al. LesionTracker: Extensible open-source zero-footprint web viewer for cancer imaging research and clinical trials. Cancer Res 2017, 77, e119–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gouda, W.; Sama, N.U.; Al-Waakid, G.; Humayun, M.; Jhanjhi, N.Z. Detection of Skin Cancer Based on Skin Lesion Images Using Deep Learning. Healthcare (Switzerland) 2022, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koh DM, Papanikolaou N, Bick U, Illing R, Kahn CE, Kalpathi-Cramer J, et al. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in cancer imaging. Vol. 2, Communications Medicine. Springer Nature; 2022.
- Cardoso MJ, Li W, Brown R, Ma N, Kerfoot E, Wang Y, et al. MONAI: An open-source framework for deep learning in healthcare 2022, Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/2211. 0270.
- Caban, J.J.; Joshi, A.; Nagy, P. Rapid development of medical imaging tools with open-source libraries. J Digit Imaging. 2007, 20 (Suppl. 1), 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alabduljabbar, A.; Khan, S.U.; Alsuhaibani, A.; Almarshad, F.; Altherwy, Y.N. Medical imaging datasets, preparation, and availability for artificial intelligence in medical imaging. J Alzheimers Dis Rep [Internet] 2024, 8, 1471–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ziegler E, Urban T, Brown D, Petts J, Pieper SD, Lewis R, et al. Open Health Imaging Foundation Viewer: An Extensible Open-Source Framework for Building Web-Based Imaging Applications to Support Cancer Research [Internet]. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2020, 4. [Google Scholar]
- Heudel, P.E.; Crochet, H.; Blay, J.Y. Impact of artificial intelligence in transforming the doctor–cancer patient relationship. ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology [Internet]. 2024, 3, 100026. [Google Scholar]
- Elhaddad M, Hamam S. AI-Driven Clinical Decision Support Systems: An Ongoing Pursuit of Potential. Cureus 2024.
- Hemmer, P.; Schemmer, M.; Kühl, N. Human-AI Complementarity in Hybrid Intelligence Systems: A Structured Literature Review [Internet]. 2021. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352882174.
- Ziegelmayer, S.; Graf, M.; Makowski, M.; Gawlitza, J.; Gassert, F. Cost-Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence Support in Computed Tomography-Based Lung Cancer Screening. Cancers (Basel) 2022, 14. [Google Scholar]
- Mumuni, A.N.; Hasford, F.; Udeme, N.I.; Dada, M.O.; Awojoyogbe, B.O. A SWOT analysis of artificial intelligence in diagnostic imaging in the developing world: Making a case for a paradigm shift. In: Basic Sciences for Sustainable Development: Energy, Artificial intelligence, Chemistry, and Materials Science. De Gruyter; 2023. p. 51–84.
- Rai, H.M.; Pal, A.; Shukla, K.K.; Moqurrab, S.A. ; Amanzholova STRANSFORMATIVEIMPACTSOFAIANDTHEIOTONHEALTHCAREDELIVERY:, M. E.T.H.O.D.O.L.O.G.I.E.S.; ETHICALCONSIDERATIONS; ANDENHANCEMENTAVENUES Engineering Review 2024, 44, 116–37. [Google Scholar]
- Ethics and Governance of Artificial Intelligence for Health WHO Guidance. World Health Organization; 2021.
- Muniyandi, D.; Nandan, H. Artificial Intelligence in Education [Internet]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388594816.
- Mehrmohammadi, M.; Joon Yoon, S.; Yeager, D.; Y Emelianov, S. Photoacoustic Imaging for Cancer Detection and Staging. Curr Mol Imaging 2013, 2, 89–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Agrawal, S.; Suresh, T.; Garikipati, A.; Dangi, A.; Kothapalli, S.R. Modeling combined ultrasound and photoacoustic imaging: Simulations aiding device development and artificial intelligence. Photoacoustics [Internet]. 2021, 24, 100304, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213597921000641. [Google Scholar]
- Carson, T.; Ghoshal, G.; Cornwall, G.B.; Tobias, R.; Schwartz, D.G.; Foley, K.T. Artificial Intelligence-enabled, Real-time Intraoperative Ultrasound Imaging of Neural Structures within the Psoas. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2021, 46, E146–52. [Google Scholar]
- Pinto-Coelho, L. How Artificial Intelligence Is Shaping Medical Imaging Technology: A Survey of Innovations and Applications. Vol. 10, Bioengineering. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI); 2023.
- Cheung, H.M.C.; Rubin, D. Challenges and opportunities for artificial intelligence in oncological imaging. Vol. 76, Clinical Radiology. W.B. Saunders Ltd.; 2021. p. 728–36.
- Xu, C.; Coen-Pirani, P.; Jiang, X. Empirical Study of Overfitting in Deep Learning for Predicting Breast Cancer Metastasis. Cancers (Basel) 2023, 15. [Google Scholar]
- Hill DLG. AI in imaging: the regulatory landscape. Vol. 97, British Journal of Radiology. British Institute of Radiology; 2024. p. 483–91.
- Zheng, S.; Cui, X.; Ye, Z. Integrating artificial intelligence into radiological cancer imaging: from diagnosis and treatment response to prognosis. Cancer Biol Med [Internet] 2025, 22, 6–13, https://www.cancerbiomed.org/content/22/1/6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiang Q, Li D, Hu Z, Yuan Y, Sun Y, Zhu Y, et al. Quantum classical hybrid convolutional neural networks for breast cancer diagnosis. Sci Rep 2024, 14, 24699. [Google Scholar]
- Liao J, Li X, Gan Y, Han S, Rong P, Wang W, et al. Artificial intelligence assists precision medicine in cancer treatment. Vol. 12, Frontiers in Oncology. Frontiers Media S.A.; 2023.
- Agrawal, S.; Vagha, S. A Comprehensive Review of Artificial Intelligence in Prostate Cancer Care: State-of-the-Art Diagnostic Tools and Future Outlook. Cureus 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Dong X, Chen G, Zhu Y, Ma B, Ban X, Wu N, et al. Artificial intelligence in skeletal metastasis imaging. Comput Struct Biotechnol J [Internet]. 2024, 23, 157–64, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S200103702300421X. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Elemento, O.; Leslie, C.; Lundin, J.; Tourassi, G. Viewpoint Artificial Intelligence in cancer research, diagnosis and therapy.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).