Submitted:
27 February 2025
Posted:
28 February 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Design
2.2. Materials
2.3. Experiment Design of UV Aging
2.3.1. UV Aging Device Design
2.3.2. UV Aging Parameter Selection
2.3.3. Determination of Laboratory Simulated UV Aging Parameters
2.4. Sample Preparation
2.4.1. Short-Term Aging Samples
2.4.2. Long-Term Aging Samples
2.4.3. UV Aging Samples
2.5. Test Methods
2.5.1. Contact Angle Tests
| Probe liquids | |||||
| Distilled water | 72.8 | 21.8 | 51.0 | 25.50 | 25.5 |
| Glycerol | 64.0 | 34.0 | 30.0 | 3.92 | 57.4 |
| Formamide | 58.0 | 38.0 | 19.0 | 2.28 | 39.6 |
2.5.2. FTIR Tests
2.6. Surface Free Energy Theory
2.6.1. Cohesive Work
2.6.2. Adhesive Work
2.7. Contribution Rate Calculation Model
2.8. Random Forest Model
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Adhesive Performance Analysis Based on SFE
3.1.1. Contact Angle
3.1.2. Adhesive Work
3.1.3. Cohesive Work
3.2. Functional Groups Analysis Based on FTIR

3.3. Correlation Analysis
3.4. Significant Difference Analysis
3.5. Contribution Rate of Ultraviolet and Oxygen
3.6. Importance of Independent Variables
4. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
References
- Pakenari M M, Hamedi G H. Investigating the Effective Laboratory Parameters on the Stiffness Modulus and Fatigue Cracking of Warm Mix Asphalt [J]. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 2021(3):1-14. [CrossRef]
- Liu, Q, Cao, D, et al. Research on material composition and performance of porous asphalt pavement. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering,2009,21 (4), 135-140. [CrossRef]
- Bekheet W, Hassan Y, El Halim A. Modelling in situ shear strength testing of asphalt concrete pavements using the finite element method. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2001,28 (3), 541-544.
- Kargari A, Arabani M, Mirabdolazimi S M. Effect of palm oil capsules on the self-healing properties of aged and unaged asphalt mixtures gained by resting period and microwave heating [J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 316:125901. [CrossRef]
- Bell C A, Abwahab Y, Cristi M E. Laboratory Aging of Asphalt-Aggregate Mixtures [C]// Serviceability and Durability of Construction Materials. ASCE, 1994.
- Che T, Pan B, Li Y, et al. The effect of styrene-butadiene rubber modification on the properties of asphalt binders: Aging and restoring [J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 316:126034. [CrossRef]
- Xiao F, Amirkhanian S, Wang H, et al. Rheological property investigations for polymer and polyphosphoric acid modified asphalt binders at high temperatures.Construction and Building Materials, 2014,64:316-323. [CrossRef]
- Farrokhzade F, Sabouri M, Tabatabaee N. Aging characteristics of neat and modified asphalt binders based on rheological evaluations at intermediate temperatures [J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 322:126387. [CrossRef]
- Crucho J, Picado-Santos L, Neves J, et al. Accelerated laboratory ageing of bituminous mixtures using the TEAGE method [C]// TRA2020 Helsinki. 2020.
- Duan B A, Er A. Research into effect of asphalt mixture aging on stiffness [J]. Transportation Research Procedia, 2021, 55:1251-1257.
- Li D, Leng Z, Wang H, et al. Structural and mechanical evolution of the multiphase asphalt rubber during aging based on micromechanical back-calculation and experimental methods [J]. Materials & Design, 2022, 215:110421. [CrossRef]
- Diouri K, De A, Dave E V, et al. Effect of aging and temperature on milling-induced stresses and cracks in Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) pavements [J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 313:125493. [CrossRef]
- Li F, Wang Y, Miljkovi M, et al. Changes in the Nanoscale Asphaltene Particles and Relaxation Spectra of Asphalt Binders During Aging and Rejuvenation [J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing. Volume 219, July 2022, 110808. [CrossRef]
- Liu Q, Yu B, Falchetto A C, et al. Characterization and molecular mechanism of the thermal-oxidative gradient aging behavior in asphalt films [J]. Measurement. Volume 199, August 2022, 111567. [CrossRef]
- Wang Z, Ye F. Experimental investigation on aging characteristics of asphalt based on rheological properties [J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 231(12):117158. [CrossRef]
- Petersen J, Harnsberger P. Asphalt Aging: Dual Oxidation Mechanism and Its Interrelationships with Asphalt Composition and Oxidative Age Hardening [J]. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1998, 1638:47-55. [CrossRef]
- Mikhailenko P, Kou C, Baaj H, et al. Comparison of ESEM and physical properties of virgin and laboratory aged asphalt binders [J]. Fuel, 2019, 235(JAN.1):627-638. [CrossRef]
- Franciele R A, Luís E.C, Rsc A, et al. Influence of thermal aging and long term-aging on Ni and V content in asphalt fractions and their determination in air particulate matter from asphalt mixing plants [J]. Fuel, 2022,324:124289.
- Montepara A, Santagata E, Tosi G. Lightchemical degradation of pure bitumen by UVradiation. Proc. Ist Eurasphalt and Eurobitume Congress (Strasbourg), E&E, 1996, 5: 133.
- Montepara A, Giuliani F. Performance testing and specification teses of road bitumen. Proc 2nd Eurasphalt and Eurobitume Congress, Session. Performance Testing and Specifications for Binder and Mixtures (Barcelona). 2000: 518-523.
- Bocci M, Cemi G. The ultraviolet radiation in short-term and long-term aging of bitumen. Proc.2nd Eurasphalt & Eurobitume Congress, Session. Performance Testing and Specifications for Binder and Mixtures (Barcelona). 2000: 49-58.
- Ye F, Huang P. Establishment of asphalt aging emulation system under ultraviolet radiation [J]. Journal of Building Materials, 2005, 15(1):133-140.
- Pang L, Long L, Wu S P, et al. Effects of UV Aging on the High-Temperature and Fatigue Performances of Asphalt Mortar [J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2011, 306-307:1698-1701. [CrossRef]
- Zeng W B, Wu S P, Pang L et al. Research on ultraviolet (UV) aging depth of asphalts. Construction and Building Materials. 2018, 160: 620-627.
- Li Y Y, Wu S P, Liu Q T. Aging effects of ultraviolet lights with same dominant wavelength and different wavelength ranges on a hydrocarbon-based polymer (asphalt). Polymer Testing, 2019, 75: 64-75.
- Xiao M M, Fan L. Ultraviolet aging mechanism of asphalt molecular based on microscopic simulation [J]. Construction and Building Materials,2022,319:126157.
- Zhang L, Liu Q T, Wu S P, et al. Investigation of the flow and self-healing properties of UV aged asphalt binders [J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 174:401-409.
- Zeng W B, Wu S P, Wen J, et al. The temperature effects in aging index of asphalt during UV aging process [J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2015, 93(09):1125-1131.
- Jamal M, Martinez-Arguelles G, Giustozzi F. Effect of waste tyre rubber size on physical, rheological and UV resistance of high-content rubber-modified bitumen [J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 304:124638.
- Rajib A, Saadeh S, Katawal P, et al. Enhancing Biomass Value Chain by Utilizing Biochar as A Free Radical Scavenger to Delay Ultraviolet Aging of Bituminous Composites Used in Outdoor Construction [J]. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 2021,168(05):105302. [CrossRef]
- Liu H B; Zhang Z Q; Tian Z N, et al. Exploration for UV Aging Characteristics of Asphalt Binders based on Response Surface Methodology: Insights from the UV Aging Influencing Factors and Their Interactions [J]. Construction and Building Materials.2022,347 (09):128460.
- Wang X, Ren J, Gu X, et al. Investigation of the adhesive and cohesive properties of asphalt, mastic, and mortar in porous asphalt mixtures [J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 276(sup2):122255. [CrossRef]
- Wang C, Chen Y, Gong G. Cohesive and adhesive healing evaluation of asphalt binders by means of the LASH and BBSH tests [J].Construction and Building Materials,2021, 282(11):122684. [CrossRef]
- Manolis S, Lum P. Cold Weather Paving Using Warm Mix Asphalt Technology [J]. 2022.
- Awanti S S, Anilkumar L. Studies on Characterisation of SBS Polymer Modified and Neat Bituminous Mixes Using Warm Mix Asphalt for Paving Applications [J]. Science Publishing Group, 2021(3). [CrossRef]
- Liu S, Zhou S, Peng A. Analysis of moisture susceptibility of foamed warm mix asphalt based on cohesion, adhesion, bond strength, and morphology [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020:123334. [CrossRef]
- Xiong F, Zarei M, Tabasi E, et al. Effect of nano-reduced graphene oxide (NRGO) on long-term fracture behavior of Warm Mix Asphalt (WMA) [J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2023(Aug.15):392. [CrossRef]
- Xia Z, Gang H, Zhao L, et al. Influence of Coupled Aging Condition of Heat, Light and Water on Performance of Warm Mix Asphalt [J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019.
- Wu S P, Pang L, Mo L T, et al. Influence of aging on the evolution of structure, morphology and rheology of base and SBS modified bitumen. Construction and Building Materials, 2009, 23(2): 1005-1010.











| Items | Units | Requirement | Result | |
| 25℃ penetration/(100g, 5s) | 0.1mm | 80~100 | 86.2 | |
| Softening point/(R&B) | ℃ | ≥42 | 47.3 | |
| 10℃ ductility | cm | ≥20 | 25.2 | |
| RTFOT(163℃,85min) | Mass loss | % | ≤±0.8 | 0.04 |
| Penetration ratio | % | ≥57 | 67.2 | |
| Ductility/10℃ | cm | ≥8 | 11.4 | |
| Indoor UV aging time /h | 50 | 100 | 150 | 200 |
| Outdoor UV aging time/month | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Test liquids | Contact angle(°) | |||||||
| Original | RTFOT | Oxygen(Yes or No) | 50h$$$UV | 100h$$$UV | 150h$$$UV | 200h$$$UV | PAV | |
| Distilled water$$$ | 99.42 | 97.72 | No | 101.96 | 103.97 | 103.15 | 99.26 | 104.96 |
| Yes | 99.97 | 98.11 | 99.68 | 101.18 | ||||
| Glycerol$$$ | 103.46 | 100.29 | No | 95.89 | 94.82 | 94.04 | 92.42 | 101.04 |
| Yes | 97.03 | 97.32 | 94.53 | 95.11 | ||||
| Formamide | 80.87 | 79.85 | No | 85.13 | 85.48 | 86.89 | 88.71 | 85.53 |
| Yes | 81.50 | 85.68 | 84.75 | 85.31 | ||||
| Source of difference | SS | df | MS | F-value | P-value | F crit |
| Adhesive work | 6909.03 | 3 | 2303.01 | 18.71219 | 0.0191 | 9.276628 |
| Cohesive work | 3.22895 | 3 | 1.076317 | 11.65896 | 0.006786 | 9.276628 |
| Carbonyl index | 1.58E-05 | 3 | 5.27E-06 | 169.1818 | 0.000763 | 9.276628 |
| Sulfoxide index | 0.000152 | 3 | 5.08E-05 | 196.085 | 0.000613 | 9.276628 |
| Index | Contribution rate | |
| Ultraviolet | Oxygen | |
| Carbonyl index | 78.6% | 21.4% |
| Sulfoxide index | 79.0% | 21.0% |
| Adhesive work | 79.2% | 20.8% |
| Cohesive work | 82.8% | 18.2% |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).