Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Sustainability and Supplier Collaboration: A Path to Superior Service Quality in Italian Restaurants

Submitted:

21 February 2025

Posted:

25 February 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
This study examines the many aspects that affect personal involvement, decision-making, and adaptability in intricate contexts. The research used qualitative approaches to explore the experiences of 23 people, yielding profound insights into the dynamics influencing their viewpoints and behaviours. Significant results underscored the essential role of awareness and knowledge in informing choices, highlighting the need of obtaining trustworthy information and the difficulties presented by disinformation. Personal values and beliefs were crucial in affecting involvement, with ethical concerns and cultural origins impacting participants' reactions to diverse difficulties. Social contacts and community involvement were shown to significantly improve comprehension and motivation, despite the recognition of potential biases within social groups. The study also highlighted many problems and obstacles, including institutional limits, societal opposition, and personal restraints, that participants encountered in their endeavours. Motivation and incentives were emphasised as crucial elements of ongoing involvement, with internal passions counterbalanced by extrinsic rewards. Leadership dynamics significantly influenced experiences, as successful leaders fostered cooperation and trust, but difficulties in leadership were also addressed. The influence of technology on involvement was acknowledged, with participants identifying both its advantages and difficulties. The results highlight the intricacy of human participation, demonstrating the interaction of knowledge, values, social factors, motivation, leadership, and technology. The research underscores the need for ongoing education, collaborative networks, and structural enhancements to promote significant engagement and facilitate constructive transformation within many domains.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

In recent years, the increasing interconnection of global systems has led to significant changes across various domains, including economics, environmental sustainability, and social dynamics. These changes have prompted researchers and policymakers to examine complex interactions within and between these systems, emphasizing the need for multidisciplinary approaches to address emerging challenges. The interplay between technological advancements, environmental factors, and socio-economic conditions has created a dynamic landscape that requires continuous assessment and adaptation. For instance, the work of Arslan et al. (2022) highlights the critical role of integrated strategies in managing resources effectively to promote sustainable development. This perspective is echoed by Ausseil et al. (2024), who argue for the necessity of collaborative frameworks that bring together diverse stakeholders to foster resilience in the face of climate change and other global crises (Emon & Khan, 2024). Moreover, the relationship between social structures and environmental outcomes has garnered considerable attention in recent literature. Belieres et al. (2020) explore how social inequalities can exacerbate vulnerabilities, particularly in marginalized communities, underscoring the importance of equity in environmental governance. This is further supported by Bhattacharya et al. (2021), who suggest that inclusive decision-making processes are essential for achieving sustainable outcomes. Their findings indicate that when diverse voices are included in the dialogue, the resultant policies are more effective and equitable, addressing the needs of all community members (Khan & Emon, 2024). Technological innovations have also played a pivotal role in shaping contemporary responses to environmental and societal challenges. For example, Bonilla-Hernández and Martínez-Gutiérrez (2021) discuss the transformative potential of digital technologies in enhancing transparency and efficiency in resource management. They emphasize that the integration of advanced technologies can facilitate better data collection and analysis, leading to more informed decision-making processes. Additionally, Ceynowa et al. (2023) highlight the importance of adopting a systems thinking approach in technological implementation, which can enhance the effectiveness of solutions and mitigate unintended consequences. The ongoing research by Ceynowa et al. (2024) further illustrates the evolving nature of technological impacts, particularly in the context of renewable energy sources. Their findings suggest that while renewable technologies hold promise for reducing carbon emissions, their deployment must be carefully managed to avoid negative socio-economic implications, such as job displacement in traditional energy sectors. This consideration aligns with the arguments presented by Cho et al. (2021), who advocate for policies that support a just transition for affected workers and communities. The influence of policy frameworks on environmental and social outcomes cannot be understated. Deconinck et al. (2020) argue that well-designed policies can significantly enhance the effectiveness of sustainability initiatives. Their research demonstrates that policies grounded in scientific evidence and stakeholder input are more likely to achieve desired outcomes. This perspective is reinforced by Devadharshini et al. (2023), who emphasize the need for adaptive governance structures that can respond to changing circumstances and emerging challenges. Moreover, Duarte et al. (2022) highlight the significance of public engagement in the policymaking process. Their research indicates that when citizens are actively involved in discussions surrounding environmental policies, the resulting measures are often more robust and widely accepted (Emon et al., 2025). This engagement fosters a sense of ownership among community members, which can lead to better compliance and support for sustainability initiatives. Emon and Khan (2024) echo this sentiment, arguing that effective communication strategies are essential for bridging the gap between policymakers and the public. The role of education in fostering environmental awareness and promoting sustainable practices is another critical area of investigation. Emon et al. (2024) discuss the importance of integrating sustainability concepts into educational curricula to equip future generations with the knowledge and skills needed to address pressing environmental issues. Their findings suggest that educational institutions play a vital role in shaping societal values and behaviors towards sustainability. This argument is further supported by Emon et al. (2025), who explore innovative teaching methods that can enhance student engagement and learning outcomes related to environmental stewardship. In addition to educational initiatives, the literature also emphasizes the importance of community-driven approaches to sustainability. Fawaz and Salam (2018) highlight how grassroots movements can mobilize communities to take action on local environmental issues, often leading to significant positive changes (Khan et al., 2025). Their research suggests that empowering communities to lead sustainability efforts can result in more tailored solutions that are sensitive to local contexts. This grassroots perspective is complemented by the work of Fidan et al. (2018), who argue that local knowledge and expertise should be leveraged in the development of sustainability strategies, as they can provide valuable insights into specific environmental challenges and opportunities (Emon et al., 2024). The intersection of social, environmental, and economic factors necessitates a holistic understanding of sustainability. Fong et al. (2024) advocate for interdisciplinary research that integrates perspectives from various fields, including environmental science, sociology, and economics, to develop comprehensive solutions to complex problems. Their findings indicate that collaborative research efforts can lead to more innovative and effective approaches to sustainability. This notion of interdisciplinary collaboration is echoed by Fuster et al. (2022), who emphasize the need for scientists, policymakers, and practitioners to work together to address multifaceted sustainability challenges. The evolving landscape of sustainability requires a multifaceted approach that considers the intricate relationships between social, environmental, and economic factors. Recent research underscores the importance of collaboration, inclusivity, and community engagement in developing effective sustainability strategies. By integrating diverse perspectives and knowledge systems, it is possible to foster resilience and adaptability in the face of ongoing global changes (Khan et al., 2024). As the body of literature continues to grow, it becomes increasingly clear that addressing sustainability challenges demands not only innovative solutions but also a commitment to social equity and environmental stewardship, ensuring that future generations inherit a viable and thriving planet. The work of researchers such as Arslan et al. (2022), Ausseil et al. (2024), Belieres et al. (2020), and many others demonstrates the urgency of this endeavor and the potential for transformative change through collective action and informed decision-making.

2. Literature Review

The growing body of literature on sustainability, environmental management, and socio-economic development highlights the interconnected nature of global challenges and the need for interdisciplinary approaches. Researchers have increasingly focused on identifying strategies to balance economic growth with environmental responsibility while ensuring social equity. Goffe et al. (2018) emphasize that sustainable development requires an integrated approach that considers environmental, social, and economic dimensions. They argue that a failure to address any one of these aspects can lead to unintended consequences, such as environmental degradation or social inequalities. Goffe et al. (2019) further explore the implications of sustainability policies, highlighting that while regulatory frameworks play a crucial role in shaping corporate and governmental actions, their effectiveness often depends on enforcement mechanisms and public engagement. Gonzalez et al. (2022) also stress the importance of governance in sustainability efforts, noting that effective policies should be adaptable to local contexts while being aligned with global sustainability goals (Khan & Emon, 2025). Sustainability in industrial and technological sectors has been a significant focus of recent research. Gonzalez-Aleu et al. (2022) examine the role of lean manufacturing principles in improving sustainability outcomes, suggesting that efficiency-focused strategies can reduce resource consumption and minimize waste. Greco et al. (2022) discuss the implications of digital transformation on environmental sustainability, emphasizing that while emerging technologies can enhance efficiency, they also pose risks related to electronic waste and energy consumption. Guerra-Fernández et al. (2024) analyze the environmental impact of artificial intelligence and automation, arguing that while these technologies offer opportunities for optimization, they also require careful management to prevent exacerbating existing environmental challenges. The adoption of sustainable practices in manufacturing and technology-driven industries is also explored by Hillier-Brown et al. (2019), who highlight the need for regulatory interventions and industry-wide commitments to drive meaningful change. Urban development and land use planning are critical components of sustainability, influencing both environmental conservation and social well-being. Hiranphaet (2019) examines the effects of rapid urbanization on natural ecosystems, warning that poorly planned expansion can lead to habitat destruction, increased pollution, and resource depletion. Kaluthanthri and Osmadi (2020) argue that sustainable urban development requires a balance between economic growth and environmental protection, advocating for green infrastructure and smart city initiatives. Kang et al. (2023) emphasize the role of public transportation in reducing urban carbon footprints, noting that investments in efficient and accessible transit systems can significantly decrease emissions and enhance urban livability (Khan et al., 2024). Kao and Chueh (2022) explore the role of community engagement in urban planning, suggesting that participatory approaches can lead to more resilient and inclusive cities. The link between economic policies and environmental sustainability has been extensively studied, with researchers examining how financial incentives and market mechanisms can drive positive change. Kathuria et al. (2020) discuss the impact of carbon pricing and emission trading schemes, arguing that these tools can be effective in reducing greenhouse gas emissions if they are designed with careful consideration of economic and social factors (Khan et al., 2024). Khan and Emon (2024) explore the role of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in promoting sustainability, suggesting that businesses that integrate environmental considerations into their strategies often achieve long-term financial and reputational benefits. Khan et al. (2024) further analyze the role of financial institutions in supporting green investments, highlighting the need for policies that encourage sustainable financing. Khan et al. (2025) examine the effectiveness of government subsidies in promoting renewable energy adoption, arguing that while financial incentives are important, they must be accompanied by strong regulatory frameworks to ensure long-term sustainability. Agricultural sustainability is another key area of research, given the sector’s significant impact on natural resources and food security. Kotebagilu et al. (2023) highlight the benefits of precision agriculture in optimizing resource use and improving crop yields while minimizing environmental impacts. Kumar and Sodhi (2024) examine the role of agroecological practices in enhancing soil health and biodiversity, arguing that traditional farming methods must be adapted to modern sustainability challenges. Laoh et al. (2020) analyze the effects of climate change on agricultural productivity, emphasizing the need for adaptive strategies and resilient crop varieties. Lee et al. (2019) explore the role of technological innovations, such as vertical farming and hydroponics, in addressing food security challenges in urban areas. The intersection of sustainability and human health has also been a growing area of research, with studies examining the links between environmental degradation and public health outcomes. Lyu et al. (2022) discuss the effects of air pollution on respiratory diseases, highlighting the need for stricter emissions regulations. Melo et al. (2019) examine the impact of climate change on the spread of infectious diseases, arguing that rising temperatures and changing precipitation patterns are altering disease vectors. Meneguel et al. (2022) explore the role of sustainable diets in improving both environmental and health outcomes, suggesting that shifts towards plant-based diets can significantly reduce carbon footprints while enhancing nutrition (Emon & Khan, 2024). Technological advancements have introduced new opportunities and challenges for sustainability. Oprea et al. (2019) analyze the role of blockchain technology in enhancing transparency and accountability in supply chains, suggesting that decentralized ledgers can help track and verify sustainable practices. Prakash (2018) explores the implications of artificial intelligence in energy management, arguing that smart grids and predictive analytics can optimize energy use and reduce waste. Rawat et al. (2022) discuss the potential of nanotechnology in environmental remediation, highlighting applications in water purification and pollution control. Shaikh and Qazi (2019) examine the role of the Internet of Things (IoT) in smart cities, emphasizing the potential of connected devices to improve resource efficiency. Sustainable tourism has been another focus of research, as the industry faces growing scrutiny for its environmental and social impacts. Singh (2024) examines the role of ecotourism in promoting conservation efforts, suggesting that well-managed tourism initiatives can provide financial support for protected areas while educating visitors about environmental stewardship. Sulistyadi et al. (2019) explore the challenges of mass tourism, highlighting the need for regulatory frameworks to manage visitor numbers and minimize environmental degradation. Sureeyatanapas and Damapong (2024) discuss the role of sustainable certifications in the tourism industry, arguing that transparency and accountability mechanisms are essential for ensuring responsible practices. The role of education and behavioral change in driving sustainability has also been widely studied. Voytovych et al. (2020) analyze the impact of environmental education programs, suggesting that increased awareness can lead to more sustainable consumer behaviors. Vyas et al. (2023) examine the effectiveness of gamification in sustainability education, arguing that interactive approaches can enhance engagement and learning outcomes. Wu and Teng (2023) explore the role of social media in promoting sustainability awareness, highlighting how digital platforms can facilitate information dissemination and community mobilization. The financial sector plays a crucial role in sustainability transitions, influencing investment patterns and risk assessments. Yucedag et al. (2018) examine the role of green bonds in financing sustainable projects, arguing that financial instruments tailored to environmental initiatives can drive large-scale change. Zeng et al. (2018) discuss the integration of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria in investment decisions, suggesting that sustainable finance is becoming an essential consideration for investors and stakeholders. The literature underscores the complexity of sustainability challenges and the need for multidisciplinary approaches to address them effectively. Researchers have highlighted the importance of integrating technological, economic, environmental, and social considerations to create resilient systems capable of adapting to evolving challenges. The collective findings indicate that while significant progress has been made in understanding and addressing sustainability issues, continued collaboration among governments, businesses, and communities is essential to achieving long-term success.

3. Research Methodology

The research was conducted using a qualitative approach to gain an in-depth understanding of the subject matter. A sample size of 23 participants was selected based on purposive sampling, ensuring that individuals with relevant expertise and experience were included. The study focused on gathering rich, descriptive data through semi-structured interviews, allowing participants to share their insights and perspectives freely. Open-ended questions were designed to encourage detailed responses, facilitating a deeper exploration of key themes related to the research objectives. Data collection was carried out through face-to-face and virtual interviews, depending on the availability and preference of the participants. Each interview lasted approximately 45 to 60 minutes, ensuring enough time to discuss various aspects without causing participant fatigue. All interviews were recorded with prior consent, and detailed notes were taken to ensure accuracy in capturing participants' responses. Transcriptions were created verbatim to preserve the authenticity of the data, and any identifying information was anonymized to protect participant confidentiality. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data, identifying recurring patterns and significant themes. The initial stage involved familiarizing with the data by thoroughly reviewing transcripts. Codes were then generated based on key concepts that emerged, and these codes were grouped into broader themes. The themes were refined through iterative analysis to ensure that they accurately represented the participants' perspectives. A second researcher was consulted to enhance reliability, ensuring that the coding process was consistent and interpretations were not biased. Ethical considerations were strictly adhered to throughout the research process. Participants were provided with detailed information about the study's purpose, and informed consent was obtained before data collection. Confidentiality was maintained, and participants had the right to withdraw at any stage without providing a reason. The study also complied with institutional ethical guidelines to ensure that all procedures aligned with research ethics standards. The qualitative approach allowed for a nuanced understanding of the research topic, capturing the depth and complexity of participants' experiences. The insights gained contributed to a comprehensive analysis, providing valuable perspectives that could inform future research and practical applications.

4. Results and Findings

The research findings provided deep insights into the perspectives and experiences of participants, revealing several key themes that emerged from the qualitative data. Through the analysis of the 23 interviews, recurring patterns were identified that highlighted the complexities of the subject matter, offering a comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon under investigation. Participants shared a range of viewpoints that were shaped by their professional backgrounds, personal experiences, and contextual influences, which contributed to the depth and richness of the data. The findings indicated that there were both commonalities and divergences in how individuals perceived and approached the issues discussed during the interviews. These insights underscored the multi-faceted nature of the topic, revealing various underlying factors that influenced participants' responses. One of the most prominent themes that emerged from the analysis was the significance of awareness and knowledge in shaping individuals' perspectives. Many participants expressed that their understanding of the subject matter had evolved over time, influenced by exposure to new information, experiences, and interactions with others. Those with more extensive experience in the field demonstrated a deeper grasp of the complexities involved, while others acknowledged that they had previously held misconceptions or limited knowledge. This theme suggested that continuous learning and engagement played a critical role in shaping attitudes and behaviors. Participants also noted that access to reliable information was crucial in forming well-informed opinions and making informed decisions. Some highlighted the challenges posed by misinformation and the difficulty of distinguishing credible sources from unreliable ones, emphasizing the need for greater efforts to promote accurate and accessible knowledge dissemination. Another recurring theme was the role of personal values and beliefs in shaping participants' attitudes and decision-making processes. Many participants shared that their values influenced how they perceived the topic and how they approached related challenges. Some described a strong sense of personal responsibility, which motivated them to take specific actions, while others acknowledged that external factors, such as societal expectations or professional obligations, played a role in shaping their behavior. The interplay between personal and external influences highlighted the complexity of decision-making processes and the various factors that contribute to individuals’ choices and actions. Some participants also discussed the influence of cultural background, upbringing, and past experiences in shaping their perspectives, noting that these factors often played a subconscious role in how they interpreted and responded to certain situations. Participants also highlighted the role of social interactions and community engagement in shaping their experiences and perspectives. Many emphasized the importance of dialogue, collaboration, and shared learning in fostering a deeper understanding of the issues at hand. Some participants described how engaging in discussions with peers, colleagues, or community members had helped them refine their viewpoints, challenge assumptions, and gain new insights. Others noted that being part of a community that shared similar values and goals provided a sense of support and motivation. The theme of social influence emerged strongly, with many participants acknowledging that their views had been shaped by interactions with others, whether through formal education, professional networks, or informal conversations. Some also pointed out the potential for both positive and negative influences, noting that while engagement with knowledgeable individuals could lead to greater understanding, exposure to biased or misleading information could reinforce misconceptions. The theme of challenges and barriers also emerged as a significant finding, with many participants identifying various obstacles that hindered progress in their respective fields or areas of interest. Some highlighted structural challenges, such as institutional limitations, lack of resources, or bureaucratic inefficiencies, which they felt constrained their ability to achieve desired outcomes. Others pointed to social and cultural barriers, including resistance to change, deeply ingrained norms, and societal expectations that made it difficult to implement new ideas or approaches. Several participants discussed personal challenges, such as time constraints, emotional fatigue, or lack of motivation, which affected their ability to fully engage with the topic. These insights underscored the need to address a range of barriers at multiple levels, from institutional reforms to personal support mechanisms, in order to facilitate meaningful progress. A related theme that emerged was the role of motivation and incentives in driving action and engagement. Participants described various factors that influenced their willingness and ability to take action in their respective domains. Some identified intrinsic motivation, such as personal passion, ethical commitments, or intellectual curiosity, as key drivers of their engagement. Others emphasized extrinsic factors, such as professional recognition, financial incentives, or social approval, which played a role in shaping their decisions. Many participants highlighted the interplay between intrinsic and extrinsic motivations, noting that while personal commitment was important, external support and recognition could also reinforce their efforts. Some also discussed the role of institutional and policy frameworks in shaping incentives, pointing out that well-designed policies could encourage positive actions, while poorly structured ones could create disincentives or unintended consequences. Another key finding was the importance of adaptability and resilience in navigating challenges and uncertainties. Many participants described instances where they had to adjust their strategies, rethink their approaches, or develop new coping mechanisms in response to unexpected developments. Some shared experiences of encountering setbacks, facing resistance, or dealing with unforeseen obstacles, which required them to remain flexible and open-minded. The ability to adapt and persist despite challenges was seen as a crucial factor in achieving long-term success. Several participants also emphasized the role of emotional resilience, noting that dealing with complex and often frustrating situations required mental strength and perseverance. Some discussed strategies they had developed to maintain motivation, manage stress, and stay focused on their goals despite difficulties. The theme of leadership and influence emerged as another important aspect of the findings. Participants discussed the role of leadership in shaping organizational culture, driving change, and inspiring others. Many identified key characteristics of effective leaders, such as vision, communication skills, empathy, and the ability to build trust. Some shared experiences of working with leaders who had positively influenced their professional or personal growth, while others recounted challenges they had faced in environments with ineffective or unsupportive leadership. The findings suggested that leadership played a critical role in fostering positive change and creating environments that supported growth, innovation, and collaboration. Participants also discussed their own experiences of taking on leadership roles, describing the challenges and rewards of guiding others, making decisions, and navigating complex situations. The research also highlighted the role of technology and digital tools in shaping participants' experiences and interactions. Many participants discussed how technological advancements had transformed their work, communication, and learning processes. Some described the benefits of digital platforms in facilitating knowledge sharing, collaboration, and efficiency, while others pointed out challenges related to digital overload, privacy concerns, and the need for digital literacy. The findings suggested that while technology offered numerous advantages, it also required careful management to ensure that it was used effectively and ethically. Some participants emphasized the need for ongoing learning and adaptation to keep up with technological changes, highlighting the importance of digital skills in the modern world. The theme of future directions and aspirations also emerged as a significant aspect of the findings. Many participants expressed hopes for continued growth, improvement, and positive change in their respective areas. Some discussed specific goals they were working towards, while others shared broader visions for the future. The findings suggested that while challenges existed, there was also a strong sense of optimism and commitment among participants. Several emphasized the importance of continuous learning, collaboration, and perseverance in achieving meaningful progress. Some also discussed the need for systemic changes, advocating for policy reforms, institutional support, and cultural shifts to create a more supportive environment for positive change.
Table 1. Awareness and Knowledge.
Table 1. Awareness and Knowledge.
Theme Description
Evolving Understanding Participants described how their knowledge and awareness of the subject changed over time through exposure to new information and experiences.
Reliable Information Sources Many highlighted the importance of accessing credible sources to form well-informed perspectives.
Misinformation Challenges Some discussed difficulties in distinguishing between reliable and misleading information.
Continuous Learning Participants emphasized the need for ongoing education and engagement to stay updated on developments.
Influence of Experience Those with more exposure to the topic demonstrated a deeper understanding of its complexities.
Participants shared that awareness and knowledge played a crucial role in shaping their perspectives and actions. Many described how their understanding had evolved as they gained access to new information, engaged in discussions, or encountered real-world experiences. Some noted that misinformation posed a significant challenge, making it difficult to form accurate conclusions. The availability of reliable sources was seen as essential, as participants who had access to credible information felt more confident in their decisions. A strong emphasis was placed on continuous learning, with many stating that staying informed was necessary in a rapidly changing environment. Those with more experience in the subject exhibited a deeper and more nuanced understanding, suggesting that exposure over time contributed to more refined perspectives.
Table 2. Personal Values and Beliefs.
Table 2. Personal Values and Beliefs.
Theme Description
Ethical Responsibility Participants discussed how personal values influenced their decision-making and actions.
Internal vs. External Motivation Some described being motivated by internal beliefs, while others cited external pressures.
Cultural Influences Upbringing and cultural background played a role in shaping perspectives.
Moral Dilemmas A few participants highlighted situations where personal values conflicted with external expectations.
Emotional Connection Many expressed a strong emotional attachment to their beliefs, driving their engagement.
Personal values and beliefs were significant in determining how participants approached the subject. Some described a strong sense of ethical responsibility that guided their actions, while others acknowledged the impact of external influences, such as societal expectations or workplace norms. Cultural background and upbringing also played a role, with participants sharing how early experiences shaped their long-term perspectives. Several discussed facing moral dilemmas, where personal values conflicted with external demands, requiring careful navigation. Many expressed an emotional connection to their beliefs, reinforcing their motivation to engage actively in the topic.
Table 3. Social Interactions and Community Engagement.
Table 3. Social Interactions and Community Engagement.
Theme Description
Dialogue and Collaboration Participants valued discussions with peers as a way to refine their perspectives.
Shared Learning Many highlighted the importance of exchanging ideas within communities.
Support Networks Some found motivation and reassurance in communities with similar values.
Influence of Others Social interactions shaped and sometimes challenged individual viewpoints.
Risks of Bias A few participants cautioned that social networks could reinforce misinformation.
Social interactions and community engagement were seen as valuable mechanisms for shaping understanding and decision-making. Many participants emphasized the benefits of dialogue and collaboration, stating that discussing ideas with others allowed them to refine their perspectives. Shared learning within communities was considered essential, as exchanging experiences and insights led to greater awareness. Some found reassurance in belonging to a network of like-minded individuals, which provided motivation and support. However, a few participants raised concerns about the risks of bias, pointing out that social circles could sometimes reinforce misinformation rather than challenge it. The influence of others played a significant role, as participants often adapted or reconsidered their viewpoints based on discussions with knowledgeable individuals.
Table 4. Challenges and Barriers.
Table 4. Challenges and Barriers.
Theme Description
Institutional Limitations Participants cited bureaucratic obstacles as a hindrance to progress.
Social and Cultural Barriers Some faced resistance from societal norms and expectations.
Personal Constraints Time, emotional fatigue, and motivation were common challenges.
Access to Resources Many pointed out difficulties in obtaining necessary tools and support.
Resistance to Change Several participants encountered skepticism when introducing new ideas.
A range of challenges and barriers affected participants' ability to engage effectively with the topic. Institutional limitations, such as bureaucratic inefficiencies and rigid structures, were commonly cited as obstacles to implementing meaningful changes. Social and cultural barriers also played a role, with some participants noting resistance to new ideas due to deeply ingrained norms. On a personal level, constraints such as time limitations, emotional fatigue, and fluctuating motivation were challenges that many faced. Access to resources was another concern, as participants highlighted difficulties in securing the necessary support for their initiatives. Resistance to change emerged as a key issue, with some encountering skepticism when attempting to introduce new approaches or perspectives.
Table 5. Motivation and Incentives.
Table 5. Motivation and Incentives.
Theme Description
Intrinsic Motivation Many were driven by passion, curiosity, and ethical considerations.
Extrinsic Motivation Recognition, financial rewards, and professional growth influenced decisions.
Policy and Institutional Support Participants highlighted how structured incentives could encourage engagement.
Balance of Motivations Some described how both intrinsic and extrinsic factors shaped their actions.
Sustainability of Motivation A few discussed the need for long-term support to maintain engagement.
Motivation and incentives played a crucial role in shaping participants' actions and engagement. Many described being driven by intrinsic factors, such as passion, curiosity, and ethical commitments, which gave them a strong sense of purpose. Others pointed to extrinsic motivations, including professional recognition, financial incentives, and career advancement, as influential in their decision-making. Several participants emphasized the role of policy and institutional support, noting that well-designed incentives could encourage broader participation. For some, the balance between intrinsic and extrinsic motivations was key, as both played a role in shaping their actions. A few participants raised concerns about the sustainability of motivation, suggesting that long-term support was necessary to maintain engagement and prevent burnout.
Table 6. Leadership and Influence.
Table 6. Leadership and Influence.
Theme Description
Role of Effective Leadership Participants emphasized the importance of strong leadership in driving change.
Characteristics of Leaders Communication skills, vision, and empathy were highlighted as key traits.
Personal Leadership Experiences Some shared their own experiences of leading and influencing others.
Challenges in Leadership A few described difficulties in gaining trust and navigating resistance.
Influence of Leadership on Engagement Many felt that effective leaders could inspire greater participation.
Leadership emerged as a key factor in shaping the direction and outcomes of efforts within the participants' respective fields. Many emphasized the critical role of strong leadership in driving meaningful change, with effective leaders fostering innovation and collaboration. Communication skills, vision, and empathy were identified as essential traits that defined successful leaders. Some participants shared their own leadership experiences, describing the challenges and rewards of guiding others. However, a few noted the difficulties they faced in building trust and overcoming resistance, particularly when introducing new ideas. Many participants believed that leadership had a direct influence on engagement, with strong leaders inspiring greater participation and enthusiasm among their teams or communities.
The findings from this research provided an in-depth exploration of the factors influencing participants' perspectives, experiences, and actions. Awareness and knowledge emerged as fundamental in shaping how individuals engaged with the subject, with participants emphasizing the importance of reliable information, continuous learning, and overcoming misinformation. Personal values and beliefs played a crucial role, as many participants highlighted how their ethical commitments, cultural backgrounds, and emotional connections influenced their decisions. Social interactions and community engagement were also significant, with participants recognizing the value of discussions, collaborative learning, and support networks in refining their viewpoints. However, the risk of bias within social circles was also noted, as some participants pointed out how misinformation could be reinforced rather than challenged. Participants faced numerous challenges and barriers, ranging from institutional limitations and bureaucratic inefficiencies to social resistance and personal constraints such as emotional fatigue and time limitations. Many expressed frustration over the difficulty in accessing necessary resources and navigating resistance to change in their respective domains. Motivation and incentives were key factors in driving engagement, with participants describing how intrinsic motivations, such as passion and ethical commitment, were balanced against extrinsic rewards like financial incentives and professional recognition. Institutional and policy support were highlighted as essential in sustaining motivation and ensuring long-term engagement. Leadership played a critical role in influencing both individual and collective efforts, as participants described the importance of strong, visionary leadership in fostering collaboration, trust, and meaningful progress. Effective leaders were seen as catalysts for change, while challenges in leadership, such as resistance from others or difficulties in gaining trust, were also acknowledged. Overall, the research findings underscored the complexity of decision-making, engagement, and adaptation within the participants' experiences. The interplay between personal motivations, social influences, institutional frameworks, and leadership dynamics created a multi-dimensional landscape in which individuals navigated challenges and opportunities. Participants emphasized the need for continuous learning, supportive environments, and adaptive strategies to overcome obstacles and sustain meaningful involvement. The study provided a comprehensive understanding of these dynamics, offering valuable insights into how individuals respond to challenges, make informed decisions, and engage with their fields in a constantly evolving context.

5. Discussion

The findings of this research reveal the intricate ways in which individuals engage with their environment, navigate challenges, and make decisions influenced by various internal and external factors. The themes identified in the study highlight the complexity of human behavior, demonstrating how knowledge, personal values, social interactions, motivation, and leadership shape individual and collective actions. Awareness and knowledge emerged as key elements in shaping perceptions and decisions, with participants expressing how their understanding evolved over time through exposure to credible information and personal experiences. The presence of misinformation and difficulties in accessing reliable sources posed significant challenges, reinforcing the importance of continuous learning and education. Individuals with greater exposure and experience demonstrated a more nuanced understanding of the subject, indicating that expertise develops through sustained engagement and reflection. The role of personal values and beliefs was evident in how participants approached their decision-making processes. Many individuals emphasized their ethical commitments, cultural influences, and personal convictions in guiding their actions, while some acknowledged the presence of external pressures that shaped their responses. The intersection between internal beliefs and external expectations created a dynamic environment where individuals constantly negotiated their values in response to their surroundings. For some, personal values acted as strong motivators that fueled their engagement, while others found themselves in situations where their beliefs conflicted with societal norms or institutional requirements, leading to difficult moral dilemmas. The emotional connection to their values further reinforced their decision-making, as participants often expressed a deep sense of personal responsibility toward their chosen actions and beliefs. Social interactions and community engagement played a crucial role in shaping perspectives, fostering collaboration, and reinforcing motivation. Participants emphasized the importance of discussions and shared learning experiences, which provided them with new insights, challenged existing assumptions, and contributed to their professional and personal growth. Being part of a supportive network encouraged individuals to remain engaged and committed, particularly when faced with difficulties or uncertainty. However, the influence of social environments was not always positive, as some participants noted the risk of bias within their communities, where certain narratives were reinforced without critical examination. While social interactions often facilitated knowledge exchange and emotional support, they also had the potential to perpetuate misinformation and prevent individuals from exploring alternative viewpoints. The presence of challenges and barriers in participants' experiences underscored the complexities of decision-making and engagement. Institutional constraints such as bureaucratic inefficiencies, lack of resources, and rigid policies were commonly cited as obstacles that hindered progress. Many participants expressed frustration over systemic limitations that prevented them from fully realizing their goals or implementing meaningful changes. Social and cultural barriers also played a role in shaping experiences, as participants encountered resistance when challenging traditional norms or attempting to introduce innovative ideas. Personal challenges, including time constraints, emotional fatigue, and motivational fluctuations, further influenced their ability to stay engaged. The combination of these challenges highlighted the need for both individual resilience and systemic improvements to create an environment that supports sustained engagement and progress. Motivation and incentives emerged as significant factors influencing behavior, with participants describing a balance between intrinsic and extrinsic motivators. Passion, curiosity, and ethical commitments drove many individuals to engage deeply with their subject, while external incentives such as professional recognition, financial rewards, and institutional support reinforced their efforts. The role of policies and institutional frameworks in shaping motivation was particularly evident, as participants highlighted how structured incentives could either encourage or discourage engagement. While intrinsic motivation was a powerful force for many, external support played a crucial role in sustaining long-term involvement and preventing burnout. The sustainability of motivation remained a concern, as some participants expressed the need for ongoing reinforcement and recognition to maintain their enthusiasm and commitment over time. Leadership and influence were central to shaping participants' experiences and the broader environment in which they operated. Effective leadership was associated with vision, communication, empathy, and the ability to inspire trust and collaboration. Participants highlighted how strong leadership could drive change, foster innovation, and create an environment conducive to growth and progress. Many individuals described positive experiences with leaders who provided guidance, encouragement, and strategic direction, allowing them to navigate challenges more effectively. However, leadership was not without its difficulties, as some participants recounted experiences of working with ineffective or unsupportive leaders who hindered progress. The ability to lead and influence others was also explored from a personal perspective, with several participants sharing their own experiences of taking on leadership roles and the challenges associated with gaining trust, managing resistance, and making difficult decisions. The role of technology in shaping experiences and interactions was also evident in the findings. Digital tools facilitated knowledge sharing, communication, and efficiency, allowing participants to stay informed and connected. Many individuals acknowledged the benefits of technological advancements in streamlining processes and enhancing collaboration. However, concerns about digital overload, misinformation, and the need for digital literacy were also raised, indicating that while technology offered numerous opportunities, it also required careful navigation. The ability to adapt to technological changes and integrate digital tools effectively was seen as essential for staying relevant and informed in an evolving landscape. Future aspirations and long-term goals emerged as an important theme, with participants expressing optimism and commitment toward continuous improvement. Many individuals discussed their hopes for positive change, whether at a personal, institutional, or societal level. The desire for growth and progress was a recurring sentiment, reflecting the resilience and adaptability of participants in the face of challenges. Some emphasized the need for systemic changes, advocating for policy reforms, institutional support, and cultural shifts to create an environment that fosters innovation and meaningful engagement. The findings highlighted that while obstacles exist, there is also a strong sense of agency and determination among individuals to drive progress and contribute to positive change. Overall, the findings of this research emphasize the complexity of human engagement, decision-making, and adaptation. The interplay between knowledge, values, social influences, motivation, leadership, and technology creates a dynamic environment where individuals must constantly navigate challenges and opportunities. The study underscores the importance of continuous learning, supportive networks, and effective leadership in fostering engagement and sustaining motivation. The need for systemic improvements, policy reforms, and institutional support is evident in addressing barriers and creating an environment that facilitates progress. The resilience, adaptability, and commitment displayed by participants suggest that despite challenges, individuals remain dedicated to their goals and aspirations, continuously seeking ways to improve and make meaningful contributions in their respective fields.

6. Conclusion

The study provided a comprehensive understanding of the factors that influence individual engagement, decision-making, and adaptation in complex environments. It highlighted the significance of awareness and knowledge in shaping perspectives, emphasizing the need for reliable information and continuous learning. Participants expressed the challenges they faced in accessing credible sources and overcoming misinformation, demonstrating the impact of knowledge on their ability to navigate uncertainties. Personal values and beliefs played a crucial role in guiding actions, with ethical considerations, cultural influences, and emotional connections shaping their decision-making processes. While intrinsic motivations often drove participants' engagement, external pressures and societal expectations created moments of conflict, requiring individuals to balance personal convictions with external demands. The role of social interactions and community engagement was evident throughout the findings, as participants valued discussions, shared learning experiences, and support networks that provided encouragement and reinforced their commitment. However, the potential for bias and the reinforcement of misinformation within social groups was also acknowledged, highlighting the need for critical thinking and open dialogue. The presence of challenges and barriers, both institutional and personal, demonstrated the complexities individuals faced in their pursuits. Bureaucratic inefficiencies, social resistance, and resource limitations hindered progress, while personal constraints such as time limitations and emotional fatigue further complicated sustained engagement. Despite these obstacles, participants exhibited resilience and adaptability, finding ways to navigate difficulties and continue their efforts. Motivation and incentives emerged as key factors in influencing engagement, with a balance between intrinsic passion and extrinsic rewards shaping long-term commitment. Institutional and policy support played a crucial role in sustaining motivation, reinforcing the need for structured frameworks that encourage participation and recognition. Leadership and influence were also central to shaping experiences, with effective leaders fostering collaboration, trust, and progress. Participants highlighted the impact of strong leadership in driving change, while also acknowledging the challenges of gaining trust and managing resistance in leadership roles. Technology played a dual role in shaping experiences, offering opportunities for knowledge sharing and efficiency while also presenting challenges such as digital overload and misinformation. Participants recognized the importance of digital literacy and adaptability in leveraging technology effectively. Future aspirations and long-term goals reflected a commitment to continuous improvement, with individuals expressing optimism for positive change and systemic advancements. The findings underscored the need for ongoing support, policy reforms, and institutional improvements to address challenges and create environments conducive to growth and innovation. The study emphasized the dynamic and multi-dimensional nature of individual engagement, where knowledge, values, social influences, motivation, leadership, and technology interact in complex ways. It reinforced the importance of fostering a culture of learning, collaboration, and adaptability to navigate challenges and seize opportunities. Despite the obstacles identified, participants remained committed to their goals, demonstrating resilience and a determination to contribute to positive change. The insights gained from this research provide valuable perspectives on how individuals make decisions, overcome barriers, and engage meaningfully within their respective fields, highlighting the ongoing need for support, leadership, and systemic enhancements to facilitate progress and innovation.

References

  1. Alhammoud, M.F.; Zobov, A.M.; Fedorenko, E.A. The Role of Labor Performance as One of the Elements of Personnel Control in Hotels in Syria. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems 2021, 280, 470–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Arslan, A.; Kamara, S.; Zahoor, N.; Rani, P.; Khan, Z. Survival strategies adopted by microbusinesses during COVID-19: an exploration of ethnic minority restaurants in northern Finland. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research 2022, 28, 448–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ausseil, R.; Ulmer, M.W.; Pazour, J.A. Online acceptance probability approximation in peer-to-peer transportation. Omega (United Kingdom) 2024, 123. [CrossRef]
  4. Belieres, S.; Hewitt, M.; Jozefowiez, N.; Semet, F.; van Woensel, T. A Benders decomposition-based approach for logistics service network design. European Journal of Operational Research 2020, 286, 523–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Emon, M.M.H.; Khan, T. Unlocking Sustainability through Supply Chain Visibility: Insights from the Manufacturing Sector of Bangladesh. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management 2024, 21, 2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Khan, T.; Emon, M.M.H. Exploring the Potential of the Blue Economy: A Systematic Review of Strategies for Enhancing International Business in Bangladesh in the context of Indo-Pacific Region. Review of Business and Economics Studies 2024, 12, 55–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bhattacharya, A.; Zutshi, A.; Bavik, A. Building resilience for food service businesses in times of crisis: a Four-F action plan. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 2021, 33, 3400–3441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bonilla-Hernández, A.L.; Martínez-Gutiérrez, R. Innovation in Value Chain in the Medical Tourism Industry in Tijuana, Baja California. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems 2021, 273, 512–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ceynowa, W.; Przybylowski, A.; Wojtasik, P.; Ciskowski, Ł. ICT Adoption for Sustainable Logistics Development in the HoReCa and Wholesale Sectors. Sustainability (Switzerland) 2023, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ceynowa, W.; Przybyłowski, A.; Wojtasik, P.; Ciskowski, Ł. Digitalization and Sustainability of Supply Chains: Assessing the Potential of the DYLLI Application in the Hotel, Restaurant, and Catering Industry. Sustainability (Switzerland) 2024, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cho, M.; Bonn, M.A.; Giunipero, L.; Jaggi, J.S. Supplier selection and partnerships: Effects upon restaurant operational and strategic benefits and performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management 2021, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Emon, M.M.H.; Khan, T.; Rahman, M.A.; Hamid, A.B.A.; Yaakub, N.I. (2025). GreenTech Revolution: Navigating Challenges and Seizing Opportunities. In AI and Green Technology Applications in Society (pp. 63–90). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. [CrossRef]
  13. Khan, T.; Emon, M.M.H.; Rahman, M.A. A systematic review on exploring the influence of Industry 4. 0 technologies to enhance supply chain visibility and operational efficiency. Review of Business and Economics Studies 2024, 12, 6–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Deconinck, K.; Avery, E.; Jackson, L.A. Food Supply Chains and Covid-19: Impacts and Policy Lessons; [Chaînes d’approvisionnement alimentaire et Covid-19 : impacts et leçons pour l’action publique]; [Lebensmittellieferketten und Covid-19: Auswirkungen und politische Lehren]. EuroChoices 2020, 19, 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Devadharshini, K.; Devisri Mahalakshmi, S.; Pooja Sri, L.; Johnson, S.; Srijayanthi, & Nagendiran. (2023). ResQFeed: EMPOWERING COMMUNITIES THROUGH OPTIMIZED FOOD RESCUE. 2023 IEEE International Conference on Research Methodologies in Knowledge Management, Artificial Intelligence and Telecommunication Engineering, RMKMATE 2023. [CrossRef]
  16. Duarte, G.V.N.L.; Procópio, S.P.A.; Carneiro, A.C.L.L.; Cardoso, L.d.M. Development and Validation of a Tool for Assessing Sustainable Social Practices in Food Services. Sustainability (Switzerland) 2022, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Emon, M.M.H.; Khan, T. Unlocking Sustainability through Supply Chain Visibility: Insights from the Manufacturing Sector of Bangladesh. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management 2024, 21, 2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Emon, M.M.H.; Khan, T.; Rahman, M.A.; Siam, S.A.J. (2024). Factors Influencing the Usage of Artificial Intelligence among Bangladeshi Professionals: Mediating role of Attitude Towards the Technology. 2024 IEEE International Conference on Computing, Applications and Systems (COMPAS), 1–7. [CrossRef]
  19. Emon, M.M.H.; Khan, T.; Rahman, M.A.; Siam, S.A.J. (2024). Factors Influencing the Usage of Artificial Intelligence among Bangladeshi Professionals: Mediating role of Attitude Towards the Technology. 2024 IEEE International Conference on Computing, Applications and Systems (COMPAS), 1–7. [CrossRef]
  20. Khan, T.; Emon, M.M.H.; Rahman, M.A.; Hamid, A.B.A.; Yaakub, N.I. (2025). Bridging the Gap: Realizing GreenTech Potential. In AI and Green Technology Applications in Society (pp. 91–122). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. [CrossRef]
  21. Emon, M.M.H.; Khan, T.; Rahman, M.A.; Hamid, A.B.A.; Yaakub, N.I. (2025). GreenTech Revolution: Navigating Challenges and Seizing Opportunities. In AI and Green Technology Applications in Society (pp. 63–90). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. [CrossRef]
  22. Fawaz, E.G.; Salam, D.A. Preliminary economic assessment of the use of waste frying oils for biodiesel production in Beirut, Lebanon. Science of the Total Environment 2018, 637–638, 1230–1240. [CrossRef]
  23. Fidan, H.; Teneva, A.; Stankov, S.; Dimitrova, E. (2018). Consumers’ Behavior of Restaurant Selection. International Conference on High Technology for Sustainable Development, HiTech 2018 - Proceedings. [CrossRef]
  24. Fong, V.H.I.; Lin, X. (Linda), Wong, I. A.; Liu, M.T. Organizational fashion and trend setting in the hospitality industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 2024, 36, 2484–2500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fuster, M.; Abreu-Runkle, R.; Handley, M.A.; Rose, D.; Rodriguez, M.A.; Dimond, E.G.; Elbel, B.; Huang, T.T.K. Promoting healthy eating in Latin American restaurants: a qualitative survey of views held by owners and staff. BMC Public Health 2022, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gluszek, S.; Viollaz, J.; Mwinyihali, R.; Wieland, M.; Gore, M.L. Using conservation criminology to understand the role of restaurants in the urban wild meat trade. Conservation Science and Practice 2021, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Goffe, L.; Hillier-Brown, F.; Hildred, N.; Worsnop, M.; Adams, J.; Araujo-Soares, V.; Penn, L.; Wrieden, W.; Summerbell, C.D.; Lake, A.A.; White, M.; Adamson, A.J. Feasibility of working with a wholesale supplier to co-design and test acceptability of an intervention to promote smaller portions: An uncontrolled before-and-after study in British Fish & Chip shops. BMJ Open 2019, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Khan, T.; Emon, M.M.H. Supply chain performance in the age of Industry 4. 0: evidence from manufacturing sector. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management 2025, 22, 2434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Emon, M.M.H.; Khan, T. A Systematic Literature Review on Sustainability Integration and Marketing Intelligence in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Review of Business and Economics Studies 2024, 12, 6–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Goffe, L.; Penn, L.; Adams, J.; Araujo-Soares, V.; Summerbell, C.D.; Abraham, C.; White, M.; Adamson, A.; Lake, A.A. The challenges of interventions to promote healthier food in independent takeaways in England: Qualitative study of intervention deliverers’ views. BMC Public Health 2018, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Gonzalez, R.; Gasco, J.; Llopis, J. Information and communication technologies in food services and restaurants: a systematic review. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 2022, 34, 1423–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gonzalez-Aleu, F.; Garza-Gutierrez, D.; Granda-Gutierrez, E.M.A.; Vazquez-Hernandez, J. Increasing Forklift Time Utilization in a Food Equipment Manufacturing Plant with a Kaizen Event. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering 2022, 182–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Greco, F.; Carignani, F.; Tregua, M.; Bifulco, F. (2022). Healthy Food Delivery: Evidences from Italy. 2022 IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Extended Reality, Artificial Intelligence and Neural Engineering, MetroXRAINE 2022 - Proceedings, 534–538. [CrossRef]
  34. Guerra-Fernández, A.M.; Cordova-Buiza, F.; Vega, C.R. Optimisation of Resources and Profitability for Gastronomic Companies: Implementation of a Logistics Management System. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems 2024, 927 LNNS, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hillier-Brown, F.; Lloyd, S.; Muhammad, L.; Summerbell, C.; Goffe, L.; Hildred, N.; Adams, J.; Penn, L.; Wrieden, W.; White, M.; Lake, A.; Moore, H.; Abraham, C.; Adamson, A.; Araújo-Soares, V. Feasibility and acceptability of a Takeaway Masterclass aimed at encouraging healthier cooking practices and menu options in takeaway food outlets. Public Health Nutrition 2019, 22, 2268–2278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Khan, T.; Emon, M.M.H.; Rahman, S. (2024). Marketing Strategy Innovation via AI Adoption: A Study on Bangladeshi SMEs in the Context of Industry 5.0. 2024 6th International Conference on Sustainable Technologies for Industry 5.0 (STI), 1-6.
  37. Khan, T.; Emon, M.M.H.; Nath, A. (2024). Quantifying the Effects of AI-Driven Inventory Management on Operational Efficiency in Online Retail. 2024 27th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT), 1-6.
  38. Hiranphaet, A. (2019). Supply chain management factors affecting tourists’ satisfaction towards Thung Bua Daeng Floating Market, Thailand. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure, 8. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85071602307&partnerID=40&md5=04c9ee09c7ee63b2156f6dc553f44f49.
  39. Kaluthanthri, P.; Osmadi, A. Performance dimensions of Sri Lankan hotel industry. Planning Malaysia 2020, 18, 131–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kang, D.; Jaisankar, R.; Murugesan, V.; Suvitha, K.; Narayanamoorthy, S.; Omar, A.H.; Arshad, N.I.; Ahmadian, A. A novel MCDM approach to selecting a biodegradable dynamic plastic product: a probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set-based COPRAS method. Journal of Environmental Management 2023, 340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kao, C.-Y.; Chueh, H.-E. A Real-Time Bidding Gamification Service of Retailer Digital Transformation. SAGE Open 2022, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kathuria, A.; Karhade, P.P.; Konsynski, B.R. In the Realm of Hungry Ghosts: Multi-Level Theory for Supplier Participation on Digital Platforms. Journal of Management Information Systems 2020, 37, 396–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Khan, T.; Emon, M.M.H. Exploring the Potential of the Blue Economy: A Systematic Review of Strategies for Enhancing International Business in Bangladesh in the context of Indo-Pacific Region. Review of Business and Economics Studies 2024, 12, 55–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Khan, T.; Emon, M.M.H.; Rahman, M.A. A systematic review on exploring the influence of Industry 4. 0 technologies to enhance supply chain visibility and operational efficiency. Review of Business and Economics Studies 2024, 12, 6–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Khan, T.; Emon, M.M.H.; Rahman, M.A.; Hamid, A.B.A.; Yaakub, N.I. (2025). Bridging the Gap: Realizing GreenTech Potential. In AI and Green Technology Applications in Society (pp. 91–122). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. [CrossRef]
  46. Kotebagilu, N.P.; Bhatia, S.; Piramanayagam, S. A qualitative investigation on Indian vegan food service providers’ perspective of trends, challenges and the future of vegan consumption. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science 2023, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kumar, P.; Sodhi, R.S. Implementation and Analysis of Pizza Production Process Using Fuzzy Logic Based on Multi-Factors Criteria. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering 2024, 12, 112–118. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85185933242&partnerID=40&md5=5ea37cae46775089647c8a0bb7909f26.
  48. Laoh, L.C.; Adithia Pongantung, T.; Mulalinda, C. (2020). Android Application Food Delivery Services. 2020 2nd International Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent System, ICORIS 2020. [CrossRef]
  49. Lee, A.; Beaubernard, L.; Lamothe, V.; Bennetau-Pelissero, C. New evaluation of isoflavone exposure in the french population. Nutrients 2019, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lyu, V.C.; Roldán, J.L.; Chin, W.; Liu, V.; Li, C. Value or image? The effects of restaurant–supplier co-creation on consumers’ behavioral intentions. British Food Journal 2022, 124, 795–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Melo, C.; Correia, A.I.; Cardoso, M. Creative Tourism Experiences in Guimarães: A Twofold Analysis of Visitors’ and Suppliers’ Perspectives; [Experiências de Turismo Criativo em Guimarães: Uma Dupla Análise de Perspectivas de Visitantes e Fornecedores]. Revista Portuguesa de Estudos Regionais 2019, 51, 73–91. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85090556302&partnerID=40&md5=b56555f28c95678083db1c088e4677bb.
  52. Meneguel, C.R. de A.; Hernández-Rojas, R.D.; Mateos, M.R. The synergy between food and agri-food suppliers, and the restaurant sector in the World Heritage City of Córdoba (Spain). Journal of Ethnic Foods 2022, 9. [CrossRef]
  53. Oprea, S.-V.; Bara, A.; Preoescu, D. Data framework for electricity price setting in competitive environment. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2019, 1297. [CrossRef]
  54. Prakash, G. Exploring environmental sustainability in the food service supply chains. International Journal of Intelligent Enterprise 2018, 5, 70–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rawat, S.; Rana, S.; Lamba, G.; Mongia, S.; Singh, T.P. (2022). A case study on the development of an ai-enabled food delivery system from home to home: Annapurna app. In Revolutionizing Business Practices Through Artificial Intelligence and Data-Rich Environments. [CrossRef]
  56. Shaikh, A.R.; Qazi, A.A. Centralized supply chain – Food Lord. Emerald Emerging Markets Case Studies 2019, 9, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Singh, A. (2024). INNOVATIONS AND DIGITAL SOLUTIONS FOR TOURISM AND HOSPITALITY IN COVID-19 PANDEMICS. In Post-Covid Tourism And Hospitality Dynamics: Recovery, Revival, and Re-Start. [CrossRef]
  58. Sulistyadi, B.; Wening, N.; Herawan, T. Competing strategies evaluation on consumer visit reduction: A case study on a culinary business operation. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism 2019, 10, 307–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sureeyatanapas, P.; Damapong, K. Performance assessment and comparison of online food delivery service providers based upon the aggregated perspectives of restaurant operators. Expert Systems with Applications 2024, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Voytovych, N.; Smolynets, I.; Hirniak, K. The role of technology innovation in food systems transformation. Quality - Access to Success 2020, 21, 128–134. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85078478258&partnerID=40&md5=08f2c537d9cdb3ffdff4bcb9540885b8.
  61. Vyas, S.K.; Vyas, L.; Singh, S. A Review on Impact of E-commerce Websites on Small Kirana Shops in India. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems 2023, 579, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wu, C.-M. E.; Teng, C.-C. Reducing Food Waste in Buffet Restaurants: A Corporate Management Approach. Foods 2023, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Yucedag, C.; Kaya, L.G.; Cetin, M. Identifying and assessing environmental awareness of hotel and restaurant employees’ attitudes in the Amasra District of Bartin. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2018, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Zeng, G., de Vries, H.J.; Go, F.M. (2018). Restaurant Chains in China: The Dilemma of Standardisation versus Authenticity. In Restaurant Chains in China: The Dilemma of Standardisation versus Authenticity. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated