Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Technically Competent but Interpersonally Deficient: The Organizational Risks Linked to Skilled Professionals' Social Shortcomings

Submitted:

22 February 2025

Posted:

24 February 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
High-performing employees are often prioritized in hiring due to their technical skills, which enhance productivity and innovation. However, those lacking strong interpersonal skills can create poor team dynamics, ineffective leadership, and a toxic work environment. While research has heavily focused on technical proficiency, the risks associated with interpersonal shortcomings in skilled professionals require attention. This study examines the impact of social ineptitude in the workplace and recommends strategies to mitigate its effects. Using case examples, we analyze how interpersonal deficiencies affect workplace performance, employee satisfaction, and leadership effectiveness. The findings indicate that while technically proficient employees contribute significantly to task completion, their communication and emotional intelligence challenges often lead to team conflicts and reduced innovation. Organizations that adopt targeted interventions—like emotional intelligence training and mentorship programs—tend to see improved team cohesion and productivity. Addressing interpersonal deficiencies is crucial for creating a balanced workforce where technical skills and social competence are valued, ultimately enhancing organizational success.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Technical proficiency is widely acknowledged as a vital component of individual and organizational success in today’s evolving professional landscape, particularly within the technology, engineering, and finance industries. While the emphasis on specialized expertise is crucial, it is equally important to recognize the value of interpersonal competencies. Professionals who excel in their technical domains but lack social skills can inadvertently create obstacles in the workplace, such as diminished team cohesion and increased stress levels. Therefore, it is essential to cultivate a well-rounded skill set that integrates both technical and interpersonal abilities to foster a more harmonious and effective work environment.
The expression "Technically Competent but Socially Inept" effectively describes individuals with substantial expertise but face challenges relating to others. This dichotomy can lead to significant challenges within the workplace, including conflicts that may hinder team productivity and impact career advancement. Research indicates that interpersonal conflict is a prevalent obstacle to effective performance, as it is closely linked to workplace deviance and counterproductive behaviors (Kundi et al., 2022; Singh et al., 2023; Bălașa et al., 2023). For instance, Kundi et al. have identified a positive correlation between interpersonal conflict and workplace deviance, suggesting that employees experiencing conflicts are more inclined to engage in counterproductive work behaviors (Kundi et al., 2022). Furthermore, Singh et al. illustrate that ineffective communication contributes to interpersonal conflict, subsequently leading to workplace misconduct, emphasizing the critical importance of effective communication in conflict resolution (Singh et al., 2023).
The ramifications of interpersonal challenges extend beyond individual performance and profoundly affect overall team dynamics and the organization’s well-being. Research has shown unresolved conflicts can escalate into more serious issues, including workplace bullying and harassment, particularly in environments where cliques form around these disputes (Bruce et al., 2024; Ågotnes et al., 2018). Furthermore, the findings presented by Chen et al. illustrate a correlation between interpersonal conflicts and diminished job satisfaction, as well as reduced performance, which can foster a toxic workplace atmosphere (Chen et al., 2022). Additionally, research by Feng et al. indicates that workplace romances may exacerbate interpersonal conflicts, leading to ostracism and complicating team interactions (Feng et al., 2023).
While existing research has explored the importance of emotional intelligence in leadership (Riggio & Reichard, 2008), limited studies have examined its role in technical professions, where social skills are often undervalued. This paper examines the risks associated with professionals who demonstrate strong technical skills but may lack interpersonal effectiveness. It also discusses the strategies organizations can implement to mitigate these challenges, ultimately promoting a balanced and productive work environment.

2. The Rise of the Technically Skilled but Socially Deficient Worker

In many industries, especially STEM, finance, and technical roles, employee selection and advancement often prioritize technical skills. However, there is a growing recognition that interpersonal skills—like teamwork, conflict resolution, and emotional intelligence—are equally important for success in collaborative settings. Neglecting these skills can result in professionals who perform well independently but struggle in team environments, leading to workplace disruptions and decreased efficiency.
Research shows that non-technical skills are crucial for effective collaboration in professional settings. Peddle et al. (2018) highlight that health professionals’ standards documents stress the importance of communication and teamwork for optimal clinical functioning. Additionally, Suter et al. (2009) point out that understanding roles and effective communication are essential for successful collaborative practice. There is a strong need for a structured framework to prepare professionals for interprofessional teamwork. Reader et al. (2006) emphasize the importance of non-technical skills in high-stakes environments like intensive care units, where teamwork is crucial for patient safety. Differing professional cultures often hinder effective collaboration among team members. Hall (2005) notes that increased specialization can lead to a stronger focus on individual professional cultures, creating obstacles to interprofessional teamwork. This is especially true in technical fields, where focusing on technical skills may overshadow collaboration. MacNaughton et al. (2013) further highlight that hierarchical relationships can impede collaboration among health professionals, signaling the need for a more integrated approach to improve team dynamics.

3. The Risks of Poor Interpersonal Skills

3.1. Leadership Failures

Leadership shortcomings often stem from a deficiency in emotional intelligence and social skills, crucial for fostering a constructive workplace and ensuring team cohesion. The effectiveness of leadership is grounded not only in technical expertise but also in the ability to navigate social dynamics and demonstrate emotional acumen. Riggio and Reichard (2008) underscore the significance of emotional and social intelligence in effective leadership, highlighting that social skills like expressiveness and control are linked to leader effectiveness and emergence (Riggio & Reichard, 2008). This indicates that leaders lacking these interpersonal skills may face challenges connecting with their teams, potentially resulting in leadership failures.
Noman et al. (2016) emphasize that strong interpersonal skills are crucial for effective leadership, particularly in educational environments where motivating and engaging others is key. This highlights the importance of incorporating interpersonal skills training into leadership programs. Davenport and Dunnick (2018) argue that leadership consists of distinct, trainable skills separate from management competencies. They stress the need for targeted efforts to develop these skills to minimize leadership failures. This view aligns with Deming’s (2017) research, which points to the increasing significance of social skills in the labor market, noting that lacking these skills can lead to adverse outcomes in professional settings.
Insufficient interpersonal skills affect individual leaders and impact organizational culture and effectiveness. According to Mulvey et al. (2022), employers in STEM increasingly prioritize candidates with strong interpersonal skills, highlighting the importance of social competence in technical roles. Professionals who are technically skilled but lack interpersonal abilities might struggle with career advancement and teamwork. This skills gap can lead to toxic workplace cultures, ultimately reducing productivity.

3.2. Toxic Work Environments

Inadequate interpersonal skills in toxic work environments have serious consequences. Poor communication significantly affects employee well-being. Uysal and Öner-Özkan (2007) discuss the "MUM effect," where individuals avoid sharing bad news out of fear of adverse reactions. This reluctance leads to unresolved issues and creates a culture of mistrust and anxiety. March et al. (2017) research shows that people are highly responsive to threats, which can escalate stress and conflict in workplaces with poor interpersonal dynamics. Baumeister et al. (2001) also point out that negative interactions carry more weight than positive ones, meaning toxic behaviors can overshadow good contributions. This cycle of negativity not only increases toxicity but also harms team cohesion and productivity.
Ineffective interpersonal skills can significantly affect organizational culture. According to Newman et al. (2013), individuals’ self-perceptions and judgments about others often lead to biased interpretations, reinforcing negative team dynamics. Accountability diminishes when leaders and team members fail to recognize their interpersonal challenges, allowing negative behaviors to persist. Toxic work environments disrupt team dynamics and harm overall organizational performance. Research by Jeon et al. (2022) reveals that a toxic workplace can adversely affect employees’ health, leading to long-term consequences for retention and mortality.

3.3. Team Dysfunction and Reduced Collaboration

Inadequate interpersonal skills can hinder team dynamics and collaboration within organizations. Individuals with poor communication skills may cause misunderstandings, conflicts, and distrust among team members, negatively affecting productivity. Effective communication is crucial for fostering collaboration, and team leaders play a key role in promoting an open communication culture, as Edmondson (2003) noted. Without this support, trust and cooperation can deteriorate. Additionally, Kozlowski and Ilgen emphasize that cognitive, motivational, and behavioral processes are essential for team effectiveness. Poor interpersonal dynamics can obstruct these processes, reducing team performance (Kozlowski & Ilgen, 2006).
As Adu and Opawole (2019) highlighted, interpersonal skills are critical for team performance. They stress that open discussions and mutual support among team members are essential for successfully completing projects. A meta-analysis by LePine et al. (2008) further confirms a strong link between effective teamwork processes, especially interpersonal interactions, and overall team success. In contrast, poor communication and conflict resolution can negatively impact a team’s performance.
Inadequate interpersonal skills have a significant negative impact on organizational culture. Research by Kida et al. (2024) shows that collaborative leadership and strong workplace social connections are essential for creating a positive team environment and improving patient safety and team dynamics. On the other hand, a lack of interpersonal skills in leaders can create a toxic work environment, diminishing collaboration and innovation. This issue is especially critical in high-stakes fields like healthcare, where effective teamwork is vital for patient safety (Reader et al., 2011).
As Zhang and Huo (2015) noted, interpersonal conflict can significantly hinder team performance in project management. However, high political skills among team members can help reduce these negative impacts. This highlights that while interpersonal conflicts can create challenges, strong interpersonal skills are key to resolving them and enhancing team collaboration.

3.4. Career Limitations

Limited interpersonal skills can significantly hinder career advancement, especially in fields where communication and collaboration are crucial. Research shows that individuals who struggle with these skills face challenges like fewer promotion opportunities, networking issues, and difficulties with teamwork. A meta-analysis by Ng et al. (2005) highlights that extroversion and strong interpersonal skills are key to career success. Their findings suggest that outgoing individuals are more likely to receive organizational support and advance in their careers. Consequently, those with poor interpersonal skills may be disadvantaged in competitive job markets.
Koh et al. (2022) studied the link between leadership competencies and career advancement in allied health professionals. They found a positive correlation between interpersonal skills and career progression, emphasizing the importance of empathy and social skills in healthcare. The research suggests that lacking these skills can hinder career growth, especially in roles that require strong collaboration and communication.
Wang et al. analyzed the career challenges faced by vocational college graduates and found that a lack of planning and interpersonal skills significantly hinders their professional growth. The study revealed that graduates struggling with interpersonal relationships often face obstacles in securing desired positions and advancing in their careers (Wang et al., 2022). This emphasizes how crucial interpersonal skills are for achieving perceived career success.
Snow et al. (2021) highlight the rise of toxic leadership in educational settings, which can severely impede professional growth and limit career opportunities for leaders and their teams. Toxic behaviors often lead to strained relationships and negatively affect career paths. This shows that poor interpersonal skills harm individual performance and impact the organization’s overall culture.
Research by Yates et al. (2016) shows a strong link between self-presentation, interpersonal skills, and attractiveness in professional environments. They found that individuals with strong interpersonal skills are often viewed more favorably during hiring and promotion. This indicates that those lacking these skills may face challenges in advancing their careers.

4. Psychological and Organizational Factors

Interpersonal challenges in the workplace stem from various psychological and organizational factors, impacting employee interactions and overall effectiveness. Key issues include personality traits, past experiences, and a workplace culture prioritizing results over relationships. Additionally, lacking emotional intelligence and communication skills training can worsen these challenges. Personality traits such as introversion and neuroticism can significantly affect workplace relationships. Research by Yang and Diefendorff shows these traits are associated with specific workplace behaviors. Individuals with certain personality traits may face challenges in interpersonal interactions, potentially leading to counterproductive behaviors (Yang & Diefendorff, 2009).
Past experiences significantly influence interpersonal skills. Sun et al. (2022) study the impact of psychological capital—such as resilience and self-efficacy—on workplace well-being. Their findings indicate that individuals with positive psychological traits handle interpersonal challenges better. In contrast, those with negative past experiences struggle to build constructive relationships with colleagues, leading to common interpersonal issues.
Workplace culture significantly influences employee interactions and organizational effectiveness. Environments focused solely on results may overlook the importance of interpersonal skills. Research by Torkelson et al. (2016) shows that factors like job autonomy and stress can contribute to workplace incivility, indicating poor interpersonal dynamics. Leka et al. (2011) also emphasize that psychosocial risks and occupational stress negatively impact mental well-being. Their findings highlight that a toxic workplace culture can worsen interpersonal issues, making it crucial to create a supportive and collaborative environment.

5. Case Examples

The Impact of Rudeness on Medical Teams:
A study in the Journal of Applied Psychology, reported by the New York Post in 2024, found that even mild rudeness can reduce medical teams’ performance by 44%, impacting their ability to carry out lifesaving procedures. This highlights the profound effects of negative interactions despite the team’s technical expertise.
The High-Performing Yet Disruptive Team Members:
A 2012 article in The American Genius discusses a company that struggled with high-performing employees who displayed rude, condescending, and sarcastic behaviors despite their strong technical skills. This created a disruptive work environment and led to complaints from both colleagues and supervisors. The situation highlighted that technical excellence is not enough without strong interpersonal skills.
The Chemist Who Buried His Findings:
A research chemist, Bruce excelled at synthesizing new compounds from oil-refining by-products. However, his report was dense and unclear, with a key insight about a potential insecticide mentioned only at the end. This lack of effective communication resulted in the oversight of important findings, highlighting how poor interpersonal skills can hinder the recognition of valuable contributions (Goerges, 1996).
Technical skills are important, but without strong interpersonal competencies, organizations face challenges like financial losses, lower team performance, and missed innovations. Addressing these gaps with targeted training and promoting a culture prioritizing effective communication for overall success is vital.

6. Strategies for Improvement

Mark Feffer (2016) presented a case study highlighting the experience of an IT employee at The Motley Fool, an investment media organization. This individual demonstrated strong technical proficiency essential for his role; however, he encountered difficulties adapting to new technologies and collaborating effectively with colleagues. Recognizing his valuable technical skills and interpersonal interaction challenges, the company strategically transitioned him into a customer-facing position that better aligned with his strengths. This approach allowed the organization to retain a talented employee and enabled him to thrive in a role where his interpersonal limitations would have a lesser impact on team dynamics.
To improve proficiency in work tasks while overcoming challenges in interpersonal interactions, organizations and individuals should implement effective strategies to enhance interpersonal skills and foster collaboration. The following references provide practical approaches for these improvements:
Workplace Training: Implementing training programs that focus on emotional intelligence, leadership, and communication is crucial for developing interpersonal skills within the workplace. Research by Bambacas and Patrickson underscores the importance of these interpersonal communication skills in fostering organizational commitment, suggesting that targeted training in these areas can lead to enhanced employee engagement and satisfaction (Bambacas & Patrickson, 2008). This finding is further supported by the work of Zolnierek and DiMatteo, who demonstrate that communication skills training for healthcare professionals significantly improves patient adherence. Similar training initiatives could yield beneficial outcomes across various professional settings (Zolnierek & DiMatteo, 2009).
Coaching and Mentorship: Fostering the development of interpersonal skills among employees through structured mentorship programs can be highly effective. Research conducted by Greco et al. demonstrated that acquiring feedback from patients significantly enhanced the interpersonal skills of general practice registrars, underscoring the impact of structured feedback and mentorship in improving communication competencies (Greco et al., 2001). Additionally, findings from Walker et al. revealed that participation in small-group standardized patient encounters contributed to improved psychosocial intervention and referral skills among athletic training students, highlighting the advantages of hands-on mentorship and coaching (Walker et al., 2016).
Personality-Aware Management: Strategically assigning roles considering technical expertise and interpersonal strengths can significantly enhance team dynamics. Research by Matzler et al. (2008) indicates that personality traits, such as agreeableness and openness, play a crucial role in facilitating knowledge sharing among team members. By acknowledging and understanding these traits, organizations can foster improved collaboration, leading to more effective team compositions and enhanced overall performance.
Encouraging Feedback: Fostering an environment where employees receive constructive feedback regarding their interpersonal effectiveness is essential. Research by Chandler et al. underscores the value of 360-degree evaluations in assessing interpersonal and communication skills, demonstrating that these feedback mechanisms can significantly contribute to personal and professional development (Chandler et al., 2010). Furthermore, findings from Tabiee et al. illustrate a positive correlation between practical communication skills and job satisfaction among nursing staff, thereby highlighting the critical role of feedback in enhancing interpersonal interactions (Tabiee et al., 2018).

7. Conclusion

Technical skills are essential in today’s workplace, but without strong interpersonal skills, they can lead to significant challenges. This study shows that employees who are technically proficient but socially awkward often struggle with leadership, teamwork, and workplace culture. This can negatively impact productivity and the organization as a whole. While these employees may perform tasks well, their poor communication and collaboration abilities can result in conflicts, hinder innovation, and stall their careers. Organizations should adopt hiring and promotion strategies that include social competencies, not just skills. Implementing emotional intelligence training, mentorship, and leadership development can help combine technical skills with social abilities. Creating a workplace culture that values communication, adaptability, and collaboration can also effectively address interpersonal challenges. In today’s team-oriented workplace, addressing interpersonal challenges among high-performing professionals is essential. Organizations investing in technical and interpersonal skills will improve team dynamics, boost productivity, and foster a more inclusive and engaging environment. Future research should focus on industry-specific strategies to enhance the integration of interpersonal skill development into training and leadership programs.

References

  1. Adu, E. and Opawole, A. (2019). Assessment of performance of teamwork in construction projects delivery in south-southern Nigeria. Journal of Engineering Design and Technology, 18(1), 230-250. [CrossRef]
  2. Ågotnes, K., Einarsen, S., Hetland, J., & Skogstad, A. (2018). The moderating effect of laissez-faire leadership on the relationship between co-worker conflicts and new cases of workplace bullying: a true prospective design. Human Resource Management Journal, 28(4), 555-568. [CrossRef]
  3. Bălașa, M., Sterghiuli, A., Tănase, M., & Matei, R. (2023). The effects of interpersonal conflict on employee satisfaction and productivity in the workplace. BSJoP, 14(4), 89-102. [CrossRef]
  4. Bambacas, M. and Patrickson, M. (2008). Interpersonal communication skills that enhance organizational commitment. Journal of Communication Management, 12(1), 51-72. [CrossRef]
  5. Baumeister, R., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323-370. [CrossRef]
  6. Bruce, P., Hrymak, V., Bruce, C., & Byrne, J. (2024). The role of interpersonal conflict as a cause of work-related stress in construction managers in Ireland. Construction Innovation, 25(1), 61–77. [CrossRef]
  7. Chandler, N., Henderson, G., Park, B., Byerley, J., Brown, W., & Steiner, M. (2010). Use of a 360-degree evaluation in the outpatient setting: the usefulness of nurse, faculty, patient/family, and resident self-evaluation. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 2(3), 430–434. [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, M., Dong, H., Luo, Y., & Meng, H. (2022). The effect of sleep on workplace interpersonal conflict: the mediating role of ego depletion. International Journal of Mental Health Promotion, 24(6), 901-916. [CrossRef]
  9. Davenport, M. & Dunnick, N. (2018). Lessons on leadership. Radiographics, 38(6), 1688–1693. [CrossRef]
  10. Deming, D. (2017). The growing importance of social skills in the labor market*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(4), 1593–1640. [CrossRef]
  11. Edmondson, A. (2003). Speaking up in the operating room: how team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1419–1452. [CrossRef]
  12. Feng, Y., Rana, A., Bashir, H., Sarmad, M., Rasheed, A., & Ayub, A. (2023). What’s love got to do with it? how does workplace romance provoke workplace ostracism and interpersonal conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 34(4), 773–800. [CrossRef]
  13. Greco, M., Brownlea, A., & McGovern, J. (2001). Impact of patient feedback on the interpersonal skills of general practice registrars: results of a longitudinal study. Medical Education, 35(8), 748–756. [CrossRef]
  14. Hall, P. (2005). Interprofessional teamwork: professional cultures as barriers. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19(sup1), 188–196. [CrossRef]
  15. Jeon, M., Kim, J., & Bae, S. (2022). The long-term associations of objective and subjective health status on mortality. Iranian Journal of Public Health. [CrossRef]
  16. Kida, R., Fujitani, K., & Matsushita, H. (2024). Impact of collaborative leadership, workplace social capital, and interprofessional collaboration practice on patient safety climate. Journal for Healthcare Quality, 46(5), 268-275. [CrossRef]
  17. Koh, J., Ang, H., Lee, J., & Pua, Y. (2022). The hard truth about soft skills: exploring the association between leadership competency and career advancement of allied health professionals. Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare, 31. [CrossRef]
  18. Kozlowski, S. and Ilgen, D. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3), 77-124. [CrossRef]
  19. Kundi, Y., Badar, K., Sarfraz, M., & Ashraf, N. (2022). Interpersonal conflict as a barrier to task performance: the mediating role of workplace deviance and the moderating role of emotional intelligence. International Journal of Conflict Management, 34(1), 104-124. [CrossRef]
  20. Leka, S., Hassard, J., & Yanagida, A. (2011). Investigating the impact of psychosocial risks and occupational stress on psychiatric hospital nurses’ mental well-being in japan. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 19(2), 123-131. [CrossRef]
  21. LePine, J., Piccolo, R., Jackson, C., Mathieu, J., & Saul, J. (2008). A meta-analysis of teamwork processes: tests of a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria. Personnel Psychology, 61(2), 273-307. [CrossRef]
  22. MacNaughton, K., Chreim, S., & Bourgeault, I. (2013). Role construction and boundaries in interprofessional primary health care teams: a qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 13(1). [CrossRef]
  23. March, D., Gaertner, L., & Olson, M. (2017). In harm’s way: on preferential response to threatening stimuli. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(11), 1519-1529. [CrossRef]
  24. Mark Feffer (2016). https://www.shrm.org/topics-tools/news/hr-magazine/hrs-hard-challenge-employees-lack-soft-skills?utm_source.
  25. Matzler, K., Renzl, B., Müller, J., Herting, S., & Mooradian, T. (2008). Personality traits and knowledge sharing. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(3), 301-313. [CrossRef]
  26. Mulvey, K., McGuire, L., Mathews, C., Hoffman, A., Law, F., Joy, A., … & Rutland, A. (2022). Preparing the next generation for stem: adolescent profiles encompassing math and science motivation and interpersonal skills and their associations with identity and belonging. Youth & Society, 55(6), 1207–1230. [CrossRef]
  27. New York Post (2024). https://nypost.com/2024/08/27/lifestyle/being-rude-at-work-could-actually-get-someone-killed-study/.
  28. Newman, G., Bloom, P., & Knobe, J. (2013). Value judgments and the true self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(2), 203–216. [CrossRef]
  29. Ng, T., Eby, L., Sorensen, K., & Feldman, D. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success: a meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 367-408. [CrossRef]
  30. Noman, M., Hashim, R., & Abdullah, S. (2016). Contextual leadership practices. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(3), 474–490. [CrossRef]
  31. Peddle, M., Bearman, M., Radomski, N., McKenna, L., & Nestel, D. (2018). What non-technical skills competencies are addressed by Australian standards documents for health professionals who work in secondary and tertiary clinical settings? a qualitative comparative analysis. BMJ Open, 8(8), e020799. [CrossRef]
  32. Reader, T., Flin, R., & Cuthbertson, B. (2011). Team leadership in the intensive care unit: the perspective of specialists*. Critical Care Medicine, 39(7), 1683-1691. [CrossRef]
  33. Reader, T., Flin, R., Lauche, K., & Cuthbertson, B. (2006). Non-technical skills in the intensive care unit. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 96(5), 551-559. [CrossRef]
  34. Riggio, R. and Reichard, R. (2008). The emotional and social intelligences of effective leadership. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(2), 169-185. [CrossRef]
  35. Singh, S., Phoolka, S., Mago, M., & Bala, R. (2023). Linking interpersonal communication with workplace deviance through transmittal mediation effect of interpersonal conflict. Journal of Content Community and Communication, 17(9), 97-108. [CrossRef]
  36. Snow, N., Hickey, N., Blom, N., O’Mahony, L., & McNamara, P. (2021). An exploration of leadership in post-primary schools: the emergence of toxic leadership. Societies, 11(2), 54. [CrossRef]
  37. Sun, B., Guo, H., Xu, L., & Ding, F. (2022). How does teachers’ psychological capital influence workplace well-being? a moderated mediation model of ego-resiliency and work-meaning cognition. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(22), 14730. [CrossRef]
  38. Suter, E., Arndt, J., Arthur, N., Parboosingh, J., Taylor, E., & Deutschlander, S. (2009). Role understanding and effective communication as core competencies for collaborative practice. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 23(1), 41-51. [CrossRef]
  39. T.M. Goerges (1996). Analytical Writing for Science and Technology [Online], Available: https://www.scribd.com/document/96822930/Analytical-Writing.
  40. Tabiee, S., Vagharseyyedin, S., Izadpanah, A., Oudi, D., & Nasirizade, M. (2018). The relationship of communication skills with job satisfaction among hospital nursing staff. Modern Care Journal, 15(3). [CrossRef]
  41. Torkelson, E., Holm, K., Bäckström, M., & Schad, E. (2016). Factors contributing to the perpetration of workplace incivility: the importance of organizational aspects and experiencing incivility from others. Work & Stress, 30(2), 115-131. [CrossRef]
  42. Uysal, A. and Öner-Özkan, B. (2007). A self-presentational approach to transmission of good and bad news. Social Behavior and Personality an International Journal, 35(1), 63-78. [CrossRef]
  43. Walker, S., Weidner, T., & Thrasher, A. (2016). Small-group standardized patient encounter improves athletic training students’ psychosocial intervention and referral skills. Athletic Training Education Journal, 11(1), 38–44. [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, L., Ye, J., Lee, Y., & Miao, C. (2022). Analysis of influencing factors of subjective career unsuccessfulness of vocational college graduates from the Department of Navigation in China. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. [CrossRef]
  45. Yang, J. and Diefendorff, J. (2009). The relations of daily counterproductive workplace behavior with emotions, situational antecedents, and personality moderators: a diary study in Hong Kong. Personnel Psychology, 62(2), 259-295. [CrossRef]
  46. Yates, J., Hooley, T., & Bagri, K. (2016). Good looks and good practice: the attitudes of career practitioners to attractiveness and appearance. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 45(5), 547–561. [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, L. & Huo, X. (2015). The impact of interpersonal conflict on construction project performance. International Journal of Conflict Management, 26(4), 479–498. [CrossRef]
  48. Zolnierek, K. and DiMatteo, M. (2009). Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment. Medical Care, 47(8), 826-834. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated