Submitted:
24 January 2025
Posted:
24 January 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Farmer Characteristics
2.1.1. Effect of Farmer Age, Educational Attainment, and Family Size on Agricultural Extension
2.1.2. Effect of Farming Experience and Farmer Cosmopolitan on Agricultural Extension
2.2. Agricultural Extension Approaches: Effects of Individual, Group, and Mass Communication Approaches on Agricultural Extension
2.3. Farmer Information Sources
2.3.1. Effects of Print, Electronic, and Social Media on Agricultural Extension
2.3.2. Effect of Clove Cultivation Material on Agricultural Extension
2.3.3. Farm Characteristics and Capital: Effect of Land Area and Capital on Agricultural Extension
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Construction of Conceptual Framework
3.2. Research Site, Data Collection Method, and Research Sample
3.3. Binary Logistic Regression Analysis
3.3.1. General Model of Binary Logistic Regression
3.3.2. Empirical Model
- Measurement Unit and Data Type
- Hypothesis Development
3.3.3. Parameter Estimations
3.3.4. Logistic Regression Model Test
3.3.5. Partial Hypothesis Test
3.3.6. Interpretation of Binary Variable Coefficients
4. Results and Discussions
4.1. Results of Binary Logistic Regression Analysis
4.1.1. Cox & Snell R-Square and Nagelkerke R-Square Tests
4.1.2. Likelihood Ratio Test (LRT)
4.1.3. Partial Test (Wald Test)
4.1.4. Model Fit Test
4.2. Interpretation of the Odds Ratio
4.2.1. Farmer Characteristics
- Effect of Educational Attainment (EA) and Family Size (FS) on the Effectiveness of Agricultural Extension in Clove Farming (EE)
- Effect of Farming Experience (FE) and Farmer Cosmopolitan (FC) on the Effectiveness of Agricultural Extension in Clove Farming (EE)
4.2.2. Agricultural Extension Approaches: Effects of Mass Communication Approaches (MCA) on the Effectiveness of Agricultural Extension in Clove Farming (EE)
4.2.3. Farmer Information Sources
- Effects of Electronic Media (EM) and Print Media (PM) on the Effectiveness of Agricultural Extension in Clove Farming (EE)
- Effects of Clove Cultivation Material (CCM) on the Effectiveness of Agricultural Extension in Clove Farming (EE)
4.2.4. Farm Characteristics: Effect of Land Area (LA) on the Effectiveness of Agricultural Extension in Clove Farming (EE)
5. Conclusions and Recommendations
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Siringoringo, V.V.M.; Bakce, D.; Dewi, N. Analyzing supply and demand response of Indonesian cloves in International market. Indonesia Journal Of Multydiciplinary Science 2023, 2, 2609–2625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Triana, D.; Tafdilla, M.A.; Antika, L.D.; Ernawati, T. Conversion eugenol to vanillin: Evaluation of antimicrobial activity. ISETH 2019, 594–602. [Google Scholar]
- Suprihanti, A. Analysis of clove agroindustry in Indonesia as an alternative green industry; 2020; Vol. 4;
- Kabote, S.J.; Tunguhole, J. Determinants of clove exports in zanzibar: Implications for policy. International Journal of Business and Economic Studies 2022, 4, 127–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kusuma, H.S.; Lantip, G.I. Al; Mutiara, X.; Iqbal, M. Evaluation of mini bibliometric analysis, moisture ratio, drying kinetics, and effective moisture diffusivity in the drying process of clove leaves using microwave-assisted drying. Applied Food Research 2023, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cahyani, A.D.; Dewatama, D.; Kamajaya, L. Implementasi fuzzy logic control pada alat pengering cengkeh otomatis. 2023.
- Lestari, N.A.P.; Bahari, B.; Abdullah, W.G.; Saediman, H. Institutions and partnership in clove farming development: A case of puulemo Village in Kolaka District of Southeast Sulawesi. International Journal of Research in Engineering, Science and Management (IJRESM). Vol. 6(12), 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Kembauw, E.; Mahulette, A.S.; Kakisina, A.P.; Tuhumury, M.T.F.; Umanailo, M.C.B.; Kembauw, M.G.I. Clove processing as a source of increasing business income in Ambon City. In proceedings of the Iop conference series: Earth and environmental science; Iop Publishing Ltd, October 29 2021; Vol. 883.
- Matital, G.; Roessali, W.; Dwi Yunianto, V. The influence of internal and external factors on entrepreneurship behavior. Agrisocionomics 2022, 6, 313. [Google Scholar]
- Mahulette, A.S.; Hariyadi; Yahya, S. ; Wachjar, A.; Marzuki, I. Morpho-Agronomical diversity of forest clove in moluccas, Indonesia. Hayati 2019, 26, 156–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riptanti, E.W.; Qonita, A.; Uchyani, R. Revitalization of cloves cultivation in central java, Indonesia. In proceedings of the Iop conference series: Earth and environmental science; institute of physics publishing, August 12 2019; vol. 314.
- Pratama, A.P.; Darwanto, D.H. ; Masyhuri economics development analysis journal Indonesian clove competitiveness and competitor countries in international market article information. Economics Development Analysis Journal 2020, 9, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rasud, Y. Induksi kalus secara in vitro dari daun cengkeh (syizigium aromaticum l.) dalam media dengan berbagai konsentrasi auksin (in vitro callus induction from clove (syzigium aromaticum L.) leaves on medium containing various auxin concentrations). Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia (jipi), Januari 2020, 25, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pradana, A.; santosa, d.; sulaiman, t.n.s. Potensi cengkeh (syzygium aromaticum (l.) Merr. & perry) di Indonesia sebagai sumber daya alam dan bahan baku obat antibakteri dan antijamur. Majalah Farmaseutik 2024, 20, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Ma, Y.; Liu, L.; Liu, Y.; Niu, X. Incorporation of clove essential oil nanoemulsion in chitosan coating to control burkholderia gladioli and improve postharvest quality of fresh tremella fuciformis. Lwt 2022, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siagian, V.J. Outlook komoditas cengkeh: Pusat data dan sistem informasi pertanian jenderal - kementerian pertanian cengkeh, 2022.
- Wahidin, A.; Helmy, A.; Sari, I.D.P. Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan dalam angka: Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan, 2022.
- Rehatta, H.; Marasabessy, D.A.; Sopalauw, S.H. Produktivitas cengkih hutan (syzygium obtusifolium l.) Di Kecamatan Leihitu Kabupaten Maluku Tengah. Jurnal Budidaya Pertanian 2019, 15, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roswandy, N. Sosialisasi penanganan organisme pengganggu tanaman yang ramah lingkungan pada malam hari. Pattimura mengabdi : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat 2023, 1, 55–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Septian, R.D.; Afifah, L.; Surjana, T.; Saputro, N.W.; Enri, U. Identifikasi Dan Efektivitas Berbagai Teknik Pengendalian Hama Baru Ulat Grayak Spodoptera Frugiperda J. E. Smith Pada Tanaman Jagung Berbasis Pht- Biointensif. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia 2021, 26, 521–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biswas, B.; Mallick, B.; Roy, A.; Sultana, Z. Impact of agriculture extension services on technical efficiency of rural paddy farmers in Southwest Bangladesh. Environmental Challenges 2021, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Danso-Abbeam, G.; Ehiakpor, D.S.; Aidoo, R. Agricultural extension and its effects on farm productivity and income: insight from Northern Ghana. Agric Food Secur 2018, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agustina, F.; Zahri, I.; Yazid, M.; Yunita. Determinant factors of agricultural extension competence in the implementation of good agricultural practices in Bangka, Belitung Province. Russ J. Agric Socioecon Sci 2017, 69, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harper, A.; Mustafee, N.; Yearworth, M. Facets of trust in simulation studies. Eur J. Oper Res 2021, 289, 197–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamil, M.H.; Tika, N.; Fudjaja, L.; Tenriawaru, A.N.; Salam, M.; Ridwan, M.; Muslim, A.I.; Chand, N.V. Effectiveness of agricultural extension on paddy rice farmer’s Baubau City, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia. Sustainability (Switzerland) 2023, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pongrácz, E.; Polonyová, S.; Poláčková, H. Development of educational activities and counseling in social agriculture in Slovakia: Initial experience and future prospects. European Countryside 2023, 15, 186–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Putri, M.A.; Veronice; Ananda, G. Persepsi petani terhadap kompetensi penyuluh pertanian di Kecamatan Payakumbuh, Kabupaten Lima Puluh Kota. Jurnal Penyuluhan 2022, 18, 59–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bahua, M.I. Efektivitas dan persepsi pelaksanaan penyuluhan pertanian pada masa pandemi Covid 19. Agrimor 2021, 6, 138–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bela, A.R.; Sadi’yah, A.A.; Khoirunnisa, N. Clove farming development strategy as an ecosystem conservation and restoration action in the Bongok Forest. Journal Of Agricultural Socio-Economics 2024, 5, 8–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, F.; Chen, Q.; Gu, M.; Peng, D. Current status of agricultural extension in China. Horttechnology 2016, 26, 846–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cook, B.R.; Satizábal, P.; Curnow, J. Humanising agricultural extension: A review. World Dev. 2021, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delgado, L.; Stoorvogel, J.J. Role of soil perception and soil variability by smallholder farmers in the low adoption rates of extension packages in Central America. J Rural Stud 2022, 93, 92–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rusdiyana, E.; Sutrisno, E.; Harsono, I. A Bibliometric Review Of Sustainable Agriculture In Rural Development; 2024; Vol. 02.
- Sujianto; Ermiati; Wahyudi, A. Institutional model of sustainable development for controlling clove pest management. In proceedings of the Iop conference series: Earth and environmental science; Institute of physics publishing, June 22 2020; Vol. 472.
- Khairunnisa, N.F.; Saidah, Z.; Hapsari, H.; Wulandari, E. Pengaruh peran penyuluh pertanian terhadap tingkat produksi usahatani jagung. Jurnal Penyuluhan 2021, 17, 113–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Darmawan, D.; Mardikaningsih, R. Pengaruh keterampilan interpersonal, pengalaman kerja, integritas dan keterikatan kerja terhadap kinerja penyuluh pertanian. Ekonomi, Keuangan, Investasi dan Syariah (Ekuitas) 2021, 3, 290–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suratini, S.; Muljono, P.; Tri Wibowo, C. Pemanfaatan media sosial untuk mendukung kegiatan penyuluhan pertanian di Kabupaten Minahasa Provinsi Sulawesi Utara. Jurnal Penyuluhan 2021, 17, 12–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhandari, S.; Hallowell, M.R.; Correll, J. Making construction safety training interesting: A field-based quasi-experiment to test the relationship between emotional arousal and situational interest among adult learners. Saf Sci 2019, 117, 58–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gebremariam, Y.A.; Dessein, J.; Wondimagegnhu, B.A.; Breusers, M.; Lenaerts, L.; Adgo, E.; Ayalew, Z.; Minale, A.S.; Nyssen, J. Determinants of farmers’ level of interaction with agricultural extension agencies in Northwest Ethiopia. Sustainability (Switzerland) 2021, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Imam, M.F.; Wan, W.; Khan, N.A.; Raza, M.H.; Khan, M.A.A.; Yaseen, M. Effectiveness of agricultural extension’s farmer field schools (ffs) in Pakistan: The case of citrus growers of Punjab Province. Ciencia Rural 2021, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuehne, G.; Llewellyn, R.; Pannell, D.J.; Wilkinson, R.; Dolling, P.; Ouzman, J.; Ewing, M. Predicting farmer uptake of new agricultural practices: A tool for research, extension and policy. Agric Syst 2017, 156, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Owolabi, A.O.; Yekinni, O.T. Utilisation of information and communication technologies for agricultural extension service delivery in public and non-public organisations in Southwestern Nigeria. Heliyon 2022, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pratiwi, A.; Suzuki, A. Effects of farmers’ social networks on knowledge acquisition: lessons from agricultural training in Rural Indonesia. J Econ Struct 2017, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Antwi-Agyei, P.; Stringer, L.C. Improving the effectiveness of agricultural extension services in supporting farmers to adapt to climate change: Insights from Northeastern Ghana. Clim Risk Manag 2021, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fangohoi, L.; Olando, M.T.A.; Widyaningrum, W.; Eddy, M.; Kornelis, M; Stenli. D.; Andarias, P. Pengenalan kelas kelompok tani kepada petani lokal guna menumbuh kembangkan daya juang petani lokal kampung bremi Distrik Manokwari Utara Kabupaten Manokwari Provinsi Papua Barat. Journal of Sus. Agri. Extension 2023, 1, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hunt, W.; Birch, C.; Vanclay, F.; Coutts, J. Recommendations arising from an analysis of changes to the Australian agricultural research, development and extension system. Food Policy 2014, 44, 129–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Managanta, A.A. The role of agricultural extension in increasing competence and income rice farmers. Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Research 2020, 3, 77–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okeke, M.N.; Nwalieji, H.U.; Uzuegbunam, C.O. Creative commons user licence: cc by-nc-nd journal of agricultural extension emerging role of information communication technologies in extension service delivery in Nigeria: A Review Journal of Agricultural Extension 2015, 19.
- Alberth, R.F.F. Efektivitas komunikasi penyuluhan pertanian kelompok pengolah pangan lokal enbal di ohoi debut Kabupaten Maluku Tenggara (Communications effectiveness of agricultural extension group in enbal cassava processors in debut Village, In Southeast Maluku District). J. Agrikan 2022, 15, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Zahrani, K.H.; Khan, A.Q.; Baig, M.B.; Mubushar, M.; Herab, A.H. Perceptions of wheat farmers toward agricultural extension services for realizing sustainable biological yields. Saudi J Biol Sci 2019, 26, 1503–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aniagyei, J.; Bakang, J.E.A.; Tham-Agyekum, E.K.; Arhin, M.; Asiedu, P. Employing agricultural extension delivery services for improving cocoa bean quality. Cogent Soc Sci 2024, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ardita; Sucihatiningsih, D.W.P.; Widjanarko Dwi. Kinerja penyuluh pertanian menurut persepsi petani: Studi kasus di Landak. Journal of Vocational and Career Education. Vol. 2(1); 2017; Vol. 2;
- Alzahrani, K.; Ali, M.; Azeem, M.I.; Alotaibi, B.A. Efficacy of public extension and advisory services for sustainable rice production. Agriculture (Switzerland) 2023, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amghani, M.S.; Mojtahedi, M.; Savari, M. A.N. Economic assessment of the effect of agricultural extension activities on increasing production and farmers’ revenue: The case of irrigated wheat production-extension model sites in Iran. 2023. [CrossRef]
- Mbeche, R.M.; Mose, G.N.; Ateka, J.M. The influence of privatised agricultural extension on downward accountability to smallholder tea farmers. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 2022, 28, 341–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wahyuningsih, W.; Susilo, S.; Anwarudin, O. Factors that determine the income of beef cattle farmers and its contribution to household income. Vol. 48(8); 2021; Vol. 48;
- Sumekar, W.; Subhan Prasetyo, A.; Irsina Nadhila, F. Tingkat kinerja petugas lapang program asuransi usaha ternak sapi (auts) di Kecamatan Getasan; 2021; Vol. 5;
- Ullah, M.R.; Mao, J.; Nasrullah, M. Climate change awareness and adoption measurements of respondents toward food security in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Journal Of Water And Climate Change 2024. [CrossRef]
- Jamil, M.H.; Basmahuddin, N.R.A.; B Dammallino, E.; Ridwan, M. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kinerja penyuluh pertanian dalam masa pandemi Covid-19 di Kabupaten Jeneponto. Jurnal Penyuluhan 2023, 19, 80–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Opoku-Acheampong, K.; Tham-Agyekum, E.K.; Ankuyi, F.; Okorley, E.L.; Andivi Bakang, J.E.; Nimoh, F. Effect of adoption of conservation agriculture on household food security of smallholder maize farmers in Ghana. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators 2024, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mizab, K.A.; Falsafian, A. Factors affecting land allocation to saffron and its expansion in Marand County, Iran; 2017; Vol. 7;
- Salam, M.; Jamil, M.H.; Tenriawaru, A.N.; Kamarulzaman, N.H.; Syam, S.H.; Rahmadanih; Ramadhani, A. ; Bidangan, A.M.; Muslim, A.I.; Bakheet Ali, H.N.; et al. The effectiveness of agricultural extension in rice farming in Bantaeng Regency, Indonesia: Employing structural equation modeling in search for the effective ways in educating farmers. J. Agric Food Res. 2024, 18, 101487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Windani, M.; Fatimah Yusuf, I.; Agribisnis, J.; Pertanian, F.; Yogyakarta Jl Nangka, I.I. Respon dan tingkat adopsi petani terhadap program corporate farming di Desa Trimulyo Kabupaten Bantul-DIY; 2022; vol. 1;
- Azizah, L.N.; Sugiarti, T. Tingkat pengetahuan petani terhadap pemanfaatan tanaman refugia di Desa Bandung Kecamatan Prambon Kabupaten Nganjuk. Agriscience 2020, 1, 353–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arifianto, S.; Satmoko, S.; Setiawan, D.B.M. Pengaruh karakteristik penyuluh, kondisi kerja, motivasi terhadap kinerja penyuluh pertanian dan pada perilaku petani padi di Kabupaten Rembang. Agrisocionomics 2017, 1, 166–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosya, A. Pengaruh pendidikan dan kelompok umur terhadap pemahaman materi literasi keuangan di wilayah prakasa peningkatan pengembangan pertanian dan pemberdayaan pedesaan (Readsi) Kabupaten Sambas Kalimantan Barat. Jurnal AgroSainTa: Widyaiswara Mandiri Membangun Bangsa 2023, 6, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salukh, V.M.; Sipayung, B.P.; Pramita, D.A.; Joka, J. Efektivitas penggunaan pupuk bersubsidi di Kecamatan Biboki Moenleu Kabupaten Timor Tengah Utara (Studi Kasus Desa Oepuah). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pembangunan dan Pendidikan Vokasi Pertanian 2022, 3, 57–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atube, F.; Malinga, G.M.; Nyeko, M.; Okello, D.M.; Alarakol, S.P.; Okello-Uma, I. Determinants of smallholder farmers’ adaptation strategies to the effects of climate change: Evidence from northern uganda. Agric Food Secur 2021, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ndamani, F.; Watanabe, T. Determinants of farmers’ adaptation to climate change: A micro level analysis in Ghana. Sci Agric 2016, 73, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nabila, Y. ; Suparman; Junaidi tingkat efektivitas penyuluhan pertanian untuk pengembangan usahatani tanaman padi sawah di Brang Ene Kabupaten Sumbawa Barat. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan (JIIP) 2024, 7, 1021–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berhanu, A.A.; Ayele, Z.B.; Dagnew, D.C. Impact of climate-smart agricultural practices on smallholder farmers’ resilience in Ethiopia. J Agric Food Res 2024, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oktafiani, O.; Sidu, D.; Salahuddin, S. Efektivitas peran penyuluh pertanian dan produktivitas kerja petani pada usahatani padi sawah di Desa Ambuulanu Kecamatan Pondidaha Kabupaten Konawe. Jurnal Ilmiah Penyuluhan dan Pengembangan Masyarakat 2021, 1, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malila, B.P.; Kaaya, O.E.; Lusambo, L.P.; Schaffner, U.; Kilawe, C.J. Factors influencing smallholder farmer’s willingness to adopt sustainable land management practices to control invasive plants in Northern Tanzania. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators 2023, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- R. Kotur, B.; Anbazhagan, S. Education and work-experience - influence on the performance. IOSR Journal of Business and Management 2014, 16, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dayat, D.; Anwarudin, O.; Makhmudi, M. Regeneration of farmers through rural youth participation in Chili Agribusiness. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research 2020, 9, 1201–1206. [Google Scholar]
- Setiyowati, T.; Fatchiya, A.; Amanah, S. Pengaruh karakteristik petani terhadap pengetahuan inovasi budidaya cengkeh di kabupaten halmahera timur. Jurnal Penyuluhan 2022, 18, 208–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Utami, A.D.; Alrajabi, P. Cosmopolitan communication behavior among agricultural extension workers in the use of information media in the digital era at Cianjur District. Mediova: Journal of Islamic Media Studies 2023, 3, 124–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yusliana, E.; Anantanyu, S.; Rusdiyana, E. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kompetensi petani dalam melakukan usahatani ikan air tawar di kecamatan polanharjo kabupaten klaten. AGROMIX 2020, 11, 202–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramadhana, Y.D.F.; Subekti, S. Pemanfaatan metode penyuluhan pertanian oleh petani cabai merah. Jurnal Kirana 2021, 2, 113–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tumurang, P.J.; Memah, M.Y.; Tarore, M.L.G. Pendekatan metode penyuluhan pertanian usaha tani cabai di Desa Tiwoho Kecamatan Wori Kabupaten Minahasa Utara; 2019; Vol. 15;
- Rusdy, S.A.; Sunartomo, A.F. Proses komunikasi dalam penyuluhan pertanian program system of rice intensification (SRI). Jurnal Kirana 2020, 1, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pangaribuan, D.H.; Soesilo, F.X.; Prasetyo, J. Pengembangan dan pemanfaatan pupuk organik ekstrak tanaman pada budidaya pertanian organik di Lampung Selatan. Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat 2018, 24, 603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Imran, A.N.; Muhanniah, M.; Widiati Giono, B.R. Metode penyuluhan pertanian dalam meningkatkan pengetahuan dan keterampilan petani (Studi Kasus Di Kecamatan Maros Baru Kabupaten Maros). Jurnal AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian dan Agribisnis 2019, 18, 289–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azumah, S.B.; Donkoh, S.A.; Awuni, J.A. The perceived effectiveness of agricultural technology transfer methods: evidence from rice farmers in Northern Ghana. Cogent Food Agric 2018, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tambo, J.A.; Uzayisenga, B.; Mugambi, I.; Onyango, D.O.; Romney, D. Sustainable management of fall armyworm in smallholder farming: The role of a multi-channel information campaign in Rwanda. Food Energy Secur 2023, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moyo, R.; Salawu, A. A survey of communication effectiveness by agricultural extension in the Gweru District of Zimbabwe. J Rural Stud 2018, 60, 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruyadi, I. Pemanfaatan brosur dan leaflet sebagai media informasi dan komunikasi pertanian; 2015; Vol. 1;
- Anyanwu, B.; Udoh, G.N. Afropolitan journals the effectiveness of mass media in agricultural extension and development; ISSN: 2730-7603X Www.Afropolitanjournals.Com 2022; Vol. 3;
- Wibowo, L.S.; Saleh, Y.; Lagarusu, L. Pengaruh pemanfaatan media terhadap keberhasilan kegiatan penyuluhan pertanian padi di Kecamatan Anggrek Kabupaten Gorontalo Utara. Jurnal Arinesia, Vol. 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Jaya, F. Rancang bangun sistem informasi kepuasan petani terhadap kinerja penyuluh pertanian berbasis website; 2022; Vol. 6;
- Munthali, N.; van Paassen, A.; Leeuwis, C.; Lie, R.; van Lammeren, R.; Aguilar-Gallegos, N.; Oppong-Mensah, B. Social media platforms, open communication and problem solving in the back-office of ghanaian extension: A substantive, structural and relational analysis. Agric Syst 2021, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nugroho, H.; Telnoni, P.A.; Aji, P.; Hendriyanto, R.; Aditya, B.R.; Wijayanto, W.P.; Wikusna, W. Pembangunan dan implementasi portal website penyuluhan pertanian di balai penyuluhan pertanian (Bpp) Limbangan. Abdimas Bina Bangsa 2023, 4, 1253–1261. [Google Scholar]
- Saputra, A.; Wijayanti, T.; Jannah, R. Sikap petani dalam menerima materi dan media penyuluhan pertanian di Kelurahan Sengkotek Kecamatan Loa Janan Ilir Kota Samarinda. Jurnal Agribisnis dan Komunikasi Pertanian (Journal of Agribusiness and Agricultural Communication) 2019, 2, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cummins, R.G.; Smith, D.W.; Callison, C.; Mukhtar, S. Using continuous response assessment to evaluate the effectiveness of extension education products. J Ext 2018, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chivers, C.A.; Bliss, K.; de Boon, A.; Lishman, L.; Schillings, J.; Smith, R.; Rose, D.C. Videos and podcasts for delivering agricultural extension: Achieving credibility, relevance, legitimacy and accessibility. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 2023, 29, 173–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loizzo, J.; Lillard, P. In the Field: Increasing undergraduate students’ awareness of extension through a blended project-based multimedia production course. J. Ext 2015, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Destrianto, M.R. Penelitian penerapan sosial media dalam kegiatan penyuluhan pertanian pada portal database garuda: Sebuah Narrative Review. Agrifitia : Journal of Agribusiness Plantation 2023, 3, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Safitri, E.; Arif, E.; Asmawi. Penggunaan media sosial dalam penyuluhan pertanian di Kecamatan Tiumang Kabupaten Dharmasraya. Jurnal Niara 2021, 13, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Humaidi, L.; Hubeis, A.V. s; Puspitawati, H.; Anwas, O.E.M. Karakteristik penyuluh dalam pemanfaatan media sosial sebagai media informasi pertanian. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pertanian 2020, 4, 111–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anang, R.H.; Cipani, R. Studi aktivitas penyuluhan pertanian melalui media sosial dalam upaya merubah perilaku petani di masapandemi Covid-19 di Kabupaten Banyuasin. Societa 2022, 11, 9–15. [Google Scholar]
- Anwarudin, O.; Dayat, D. The effect of farmer participation in agricultural extension on agribusiness sustainability in Bogor, Indonesia. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding 2019, 6, 1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aviati, Y.; Endaryanto, T. Kajian proses pembelajaran dalam penyuluhan pertanian meningkatkan kompetensi kewirausahaan petani di Kabupaten Grobogan Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Agritech, Vol. 22(2); 2019.
- Idiegbeyan-Ose, J.; Owolabi, A.; Segun-Adeniran, C.; Aregbesola, A.; Emmanuel Owolabi, S.; Eyiolorunshe, T. Information provision by public library to agricultural extension agents in a developing country. Public Library Quarterly 2019, 38, 103–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wijeratne, M.; De Silva, W.N. The paradigm shift of agricultural extension from technology transfer towards participatory approaches. Journal of Agricultural Sciences - Sri Lanka 2024, 19, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adniar, N.; Salahuddin, S.; Arif, L.O.K. Modal sosial petani dalam usahatani tanaman cengkeh di Desa Nggele Kecamatan Taliabu Barat Laut Kabupaten Pulau Taliabu. Jurnal Ilmiah Penyuluhan dan Pengembangan Masyarakat 2024, 4, 238–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mariel, J.; Sanchez, I.; Verzelen, N.; Massol, F.; Carrière, S.M.; Labeyrie, V. The role of farmers’ networks in sourcing planting material and information in a context of agroforestry transition in Madagascar. Agric Syst 2024, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lele, O.K.; Panjaitan, F.J.; Taopan, R.A.; Rofita, D. Dampak perbedaan pola budidaya cengkeh (Syzygium Aromaticum L.) terhadap sifat kimia dan populasi cacing tanah di Desa Komba-Manggarai Timur. Agrikultura 2021, 32, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nuthall, P.L.; Old, K.M. Intuition, the farmers’ primary decision process. A review and analysis. J Rural Stud 2018, 58, 28–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Danjumah, P.M.; Asiamah, M.T.; Tham-Agyekum, E.K.; Ibraham, S.A.; Mensah, L.K. Dynamics of agricultural extension delivery services to rice farmers in Ghana. Heliyon 2024, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adamu, A.J.; Nangena, M.M.; Anang, B.T. Welfare effects of agricultural extension in the Sudan Savanna of Ghana. World Development Sustainability 2023, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baah, A.K. Subsistence farmers’ perceptions of pluralistic agriculture extension in Northern Ghana; 2017.
- Akbar, I. ; Budiraharjo; Mukson analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi produktivitas padi di Kecamatan Kesesi, Kabupaten Pekalongan. 2017, 1, 99–111.
- Marding; Rauf, R. A.; Christoporus. Faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi produksi cengkeh Kabupaten Tolitoli. J. Agroland 2020, 27, 68–76. [Google Scholar]
- Kassem, H.S.; Alotaibi, B.A.; Muddassir, M.; Herab, A. Factors influencing farmers’ satisfaction with the quality of agricultural extension services. Eval Program Plann 2021, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Habun, F.; Wiendiyati; Nurwiana, I. Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi produksi usahatani di Kecamatan Kuwus Barat Kabupaten Manggarai Barat. Buletin Ilmiah Impas 2022, 23, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Widaningrum, I.; Aji, J.M.M. Efisiensi alokatif penggunaan faktor produksi pada usahatani cengkeh di Desa Sawahan Kecamatan Sawahan Kabupaten Nganjuk. Jurnal Agroinfo Galuh 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nongka, K.A.; Masinambow, V.A.J.; Lapian, A.L.Ch.P. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi produksi cengkih di Desa Kecamatan Maesaan Kabupaten Minahasa Selatan. Jurnal Berkala Ilmiah Efisiensi, Vol. 23(1); 2023; Vol. 23.
- Andrade, C.; Lousã, E.P. Telework and work-family conflict during COVID-19 lockdown in Portugal: The influence of job-related factors. 2021. [CrossRef]
- Kerlinger, P.; Gauthreaux, S.A. Flight behaviour of sharp-shinned hawks during migration. I : Over land; 1984; Vol. 32;
- Tampil, Y.A.; Komalig, H.; Langi, Y. Analisis regresi logistik untuk menentukan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi indeks prestasi kumulatif (ipk) Mahasiswa Fmipa Universitas Sam Ratulangi Manado. vol. 6(2); 2017;
- Getu, K.; Bhat, H.G. Application of geospatial techniques and binary logistic regression model for analyzing driving factors of urban growth in Bahir Dar City, Ethiopia. Heliyon 2024, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Park, H.A.N. Introduction to logistic regression: From basic concepts to interpretation with particular attention to nursing domain. J Korean Acad Nurs 2013, 43, 154–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Marudhar Identifying Variables. 2019, 8, 865–868.
- Salam, M.; Rukka, R.M.; Samma, M.A.N.K.; Tenriawaru, A.N.; Rahmadanih; Muslim, A. I.; Ali, H.N.B.; Ridwan, M. The causal-effect model of input factor allocation on maize production: Using binary logistic regression in search for ways to be more productive. J Agric Food Res 2024, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, D. Hypothesis: Meaning, Types And Formulation. Vol. 6(6); 2020.
- Anupama, K. Hypothesis types and research. International Journal of Nursing Science Practice and Research 2018. [CrossRef]
- Yuniarsih, E.T.; Salam, M.; Jamil, M.H.; Nixia Tenriawaru, A. Determinants determining the adoption of technological innovation of urban farming: Employing binary logistic regression model in examining rogers’ framework. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 2024, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rusliyadi, M.; Ardi, Y.W.Y.; Winarno, K. Binary logistics regression model to analyze factors influencing technology adoption process vegetable farmers case in central Java Indonesia. In proceedings of the international symposium Southeast Asia Vegetable 2021 (SEAVEG 2021); Atlantis Press International BV, 2023; pp. 460–470.
- Rufaidah, V.W.; Andriani, J.; Widaningsih, D. Perilaku penyuluh pertanian dalam pemenuhan kebutuhan informasi. Agriculture extension workers behavior in fulfillment of information needs. Jurnal Perpustakaan Pertanian 2012, 21, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ospina, P.A.; Nydam, D. V.; DiCiccio, T.J. Technical note: the risk ratio, an alternative to the odds ratio for estimating the association between multiple risk factors and a dichotomous outcome. J Dairy Sci 2012, 95, 2576–2584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Cohen, P.; Chen, S. How big is a big odds ratio? Interpreting the magnitudes of odds ratios in epidemiological studies. Commun Stat Simul Comput 2010, 39, 860–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tham-Agyekum, E.K.; Abourden, G.A.; Bakang, J.E.A.; Juantoa, B. Cocoa farmers’ perspective on the quality of public and private agricultural extension delivery in Southern Ghana. Heliyon 2024, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suvedi, M.; Ghimire, R.; Kaplowitz, M. Farmers’ participation in extension programs and technology adoption in rural Nepal: A logistic regression analysis. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 2017, 23, 351–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khalid, S.M.N.; Sherzad, S. Agricultural extension manual for extension workers. Journal food and agriculture organization of the united nations (FAO); 2019;
- Hassan, K.S.; Islam, M.N.; Billah, M.M.; Islam, M.M.; Jahan, M.S. Effective extension and access to education drive optimal adoption of climate-smart agriculture interventions in affected tidal floodplains: A case study. Heliyon 2024, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maake, M.M.S.; Antwi, M.A. Farmer’s perceptions of effectiveness of public agricultural extension services in South Africa: An Exploratory Analysis of Associated Factors. Agric Food Secur 2022, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]





| No. | Variable Names | Symbols | Measurement Units* | Data Types |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | Dependent Variables | |||
| The effectiveness of agricultural extension on clove farming | EE | 1 = effective (for the farmer who has a high clove farming income); 0 = otherwise |
Categorical | |
| B | Independent Variables | |||
| 1. | Farmer Age | FA | year | Continuous |
| 2. | Educational Attainment | EA | year | Continuous |
| 3. | Family Size | FS | people | Continuous |
| 4. | Farming Experience | FE | year | Continuous |
| 5. | Farmer Cosmopolitan | FC | 5PLS | Categorical |
| 6. | Individual Communication Approach | ICA | 5PLS | Categorical |
| 7. | Group Communication Approach | GCA | 5PLS | Categorical |
| 8. | Mass Communication Approach | MCA | 5PLS | Categorical |
| 9. | Print Media | PM | 5PLS | Categorical |
| 10. | Electronic Media | EM | 5PLS | Categorical |
| 11. | Social Media | SM | 5PLS | Categorical |
| 12. | Clove Cultivation Material | CCM | 5PLS | Categorical |
| 13. | Land Area | LA | ha | Continuous |
| 14. | Capital | CP | IDR | Continuous |
| Independent variables | Expected Signs* |
Hypothesis Development | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Farmer Age (FG) | -/SIG | H0: Farmer age does not influence the effectiveness of agricultural extension in clove farming H1: Farmer age influences the effectiveness of agricultural extension in clove farming. |
[56,57] |
| Educational Attainment (EA) | -/SIG | H0: Educational attainment does not influence the effectiveness of agricultural extension in clove farming. H1: Educational attainment influences the effectiveness of agricultural extension in clove farming. |
[59,64,65,66,76] |
| Family Size (FS) | +/SIG | H0: Family size does not influence the effectiveness of agricultural extension in clove farming. H1: Family size influences the effectiveness of agricultural extension in clove farming. |
[59,67,68,69,70,71] |
| Farming Experience (FE) | -/SIG | H0: Farming experience does not influence the effectiveness of agricultural extension in clove farming. H1: Farming experience influences the effectiveness of agricultural extension in clove farming. |
[36,72,74] |
| Farmer Cosmopolitan (FC) | -/SIG | H0: Farmer cosmopolitan does not influence the effectiveness of agricultural extension in clove farming. H1: Farmer Cosmopolitan influences the agricultural extension effectiveness in clove farming. |
[76,77,78] |
| Individual Communication Approach (ICA) | -/SIG | H0: The individual communication approach does not influence the effectiveness of agricultural extension in clove farming. H1: The individual communication approach influences the effectiveness of agricultural extension in clove farming. |
[79,80] |
| Group Communication Approach (GCA) | -/SIG | H0: The group communication approach does not influence the effectiveness of agricultural extension in clove farming. H1: Group communication approach influences the effectiveness of agricultural extension in clove farming. |
[45,79,80,81,93] |
| Mass Communication Approach (MCA) | +/SIG | H0: The mass communication approach does not influence the effectiveness of agricultural extension in clove farming. H1: Mass communication approach influences the effectiveness of agricultural extension in clove farming. |
[79,80,83,85] |
| Print Media (PM) | -/SIG | H0: Print media does not influence the effectiveness of agricultural extension in clove farming. H1: Print media influences the effectiveness of agricultural extension in clove farming. |
[86,87,89,90,92,129] |
| Electronic Media (EM) | +/SIG | H0: Electronic media does not influence the effectiveness of agricultural extension in clove farming. H1: Electronic media influences the effectiveness of agricultural extension in clove farming. |
[27,44,48,77,93,94,95] |
| Social Media (SM) | -/SIG | H0: Social media does not influence the effectiveness of agricultural extension in clove farming. H1: Social media influences the effectiveness of agricultural extension in clove farming. |
[37,91,97,98,99,100] |
| Clove Cultivation Material (CCM) | +/SIG | H0: Clove cultivation material does not influence the effectiveness of agricultural extension in clove farming. H1: Clove cultivation material influences the agricultural extension effectiveness in clove farming. |
[22,102,105,108,109,111] |
| Land Area (LA) |
-/SIG | H0: Land area does not influence the effectiveness of agricultural extension in clove farming. H1: Land area influences the effectiveness of agricultural extension in clove farming. |
[35,112,113,115,116] |
| Capital (CP) | +SIG | H0: Capital does not influence the effectiveness of agricultural extension in clove farming. H1: Capital influences the effectiveness of agricultural extension in clove farming. |
[25,117] |
| Model Summary | ||
|
Cox & Snell R Square | Nagelkerke R Square |
| 41.703 | 0.449 | 0.760 |
| Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients | |||
| Chi-square | Df | Sig. | |
| Step Block Model |
83.376 | 14 | .000 |
| 83.376 | 14 | .000 | |
| 83.376 | 14 | .000 |
| Independent Variables | B | S.E. | Wald | df | Sig. | Exp(B) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Farmer Age (FA) Educational Attainment (EA) Family Size (FS) Farming Experience (FE) Farmer Cosmopolitan (FC) |
.188 | .117 | 2.590 | 1 | .108 | 1.207 |
| -.365 | .134 | 7.435 | 1 | .006* | .694 | |
| 2.929 | .876 | 11.186 | 1 | .001* | 18.703 | |
| -.335 | .138 | 5.864 | 1 | .015** | .715 | |
| -3.645 | 1.238 | 8.672 | 1 | .003* | .026 | |
| Individual Communication Approach (ICA) Group Communication Approach (GCA) Mass Communication Approach (MCA) |
.713 | .580 | 1.512 | 1 | .219 | 2.041 |
| 1.276 | .843 | 2.295 | 1 | .130 | 3.584 | |
| 1.790 | .845 | 4.483 | 1 | .034** | 5.989 | |
| Print Media (PM) Electronic Media (EM) Social Media (SM) |
-2.415 | .897 | 7.246 | 1 | .007* | .089 |
| 1.928 | .680 | 8.039 | 1 | .005* | 6.874 | |
| 1.067 | .599 | 3.167 | 1 | .075 | 2.906 | |
| Clove Cultivation material (CCM) | 2.257 | .902 | 6.257 | 1 | .012** | 9.554 |
| Land Area (LA) | -1.447 | .762 | 3.608 | 1 | .058*** | .235 |
| Capital (CP) | .000 | .000 | 4.175 | 1 | .041 | 1.000 |
| Constant | -15.113 | 6.681 | 5.117 | 1 | .024 | .000 |
| Dependent Variable: The Effectiveness of Agricultural Extension in Clove Farming (EE) | ||||||
| Hosmer and Lemeshow test | ||
| Chi-square | df | Sig. |
| 1.944 | 8 | 0.983 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).