Submitted:
16 January 2025
Posted:
16 January 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Methodology
2.1. Data Source
2.2. Explanatory Variables
2.3. Outcome Variable
2.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results:
3.1. Study Characteristics of the Sample
3.2. Antenatal Visits and Tetanus Vaccine Uptake by the Sample
3.3. Predictors Associated with the Uptake of an Additional Maternal Vaccine Under the Immunization Programme in India
4. Discussion
5. Conclusion
References
- Adams, R. M., & Gonik, B. (n.d.). The Evolving Maternal Vaccine Platform. Retrieved 27 November 2024, from https://www.mdpi.com/2673-3897/5/3/14. [CrossRef]
- Adedokun, S. T. , & Yaya, S. (2020). Correlates of antenatal care utilization among women of reproductive age in sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from multinomial analysis of demographic and health surveys (2010–2018) from 31 countries. Archives of Public Health. [CrossRef]
- Beigi, R. H. , Fortner, K. B., Munoz, F. M., Roberts, J., Gordon, J. L., Han, H. H., Glenn, G., Dormitzer, P. R., Gu, X. X., Read, J. S., Edwards, K., Patel, S. M., & Swamy, G. K. (2014). Maternal Immunization: Opportunities for Scientific Advancement. Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. [CrossRef]
- Bhat, B. A. , & Bhat, S. A. (2023). Do Increasing Number of Antenatal Care Visits Improve Quality of ANC Services in India.
- Choudhary, T. S. , Reddy, N. S., Apte, A., Sinha, B., Roy, S., Nair, N. P., Sindhu, K. N., Patil, R., Upadhyay, R. P., & Chowdhury, R. (2019). Delayed vaccination and its predictors among children under 2 years in India: Insights from the national family health survey–4. Vaccine, 37(17), 2331–2339. [CrossRef]
- Davies, B., Olivier, J., & Amponsah-Dacosta, E. (2023). Health Systems Determinants of Delivery and Uptake of Maternal Vaccines in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Qualitative Systematic Review. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/11/4/869. [CrossRef]
- Dhalaria, P. , Kapur, S., Singh, A. K., Priyadarshini, P., Dutta, M., Arora, H., & Taneja, G. (2023). Exploring the Pattern of Immunization Dropout among Children in India: A District-Level Comparative Analysis. Vaccines. [CrossRef]
- Dhalaria, P. , Kapur, S., Singh, A. K., Verma, A., Priyadarshini, P., & Taneja, G. (2023). Potential impact of rotavirus vaccination on reduction of childhood diarrheal disease in India: An analysis of National Family Health Survey-5. Vaccine: X. [CrossRef]
- Etti, M. , Calvert, A., Galiza, E., Lim, S., Khalil, A., Le Doare, K., & Heath, P. T. (2022). Maternal vaccination: A review of current evidence and recommendations. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. [CrossRef]
- Fantaye, C. , Melkamu, G., & Makeda, S. (2018). Postnatal Care Service Utilization and Associated Factors among Mothers Who Delivered in Shebe Sombo Woreda, Jimma Zone, Ethiopia. International Journal of Women’s Health and Wellness. [CrossRef]
- Geoghegan, S., Shuster, S., Butler, K. M., & Feemster, K. A. (2022). Understanding Barriers and Facilitators to Maternal Immunization: A Systematic Narrative Synthesis of the Published Literature | Maternal and Child Health Journal. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10995-022-03508-0. [CrossRef]
- Khan, R. E. A. , & Raza, M. A. (2013). Maternal Health-Care in India: The Case of Tetanus Toxoid Vaccination. Asian Development Policy Review. [CrossRef]
- Kumar, G. , Choudhary, T. S., Srivastava, A., Upadhyay, R. P., Taneja, S., Bahl, R., Martines, J., Bhan, M. K., Bhandari, N., & Mazumder, S. (2019). Utilisation, equity and determinants of full antenatal care in India: Analysis from the National Family Health Survey 4. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. [CrossRef]
- Marshall, H. , McMillan, M., Andrews, R. M., Macartney, K., & Edwards, K. (2016). Vaccines in pregnancy: The dual benefit for pregnant women and infants. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics. [CrossRef]
- Mishra, S. , Horton, S., Bhutta, Z. A., & Essue, B. M. (2024). Association between the use of Accredited Social Health Activist (ASHA) services and uptake of institutional deliveries in India. PLOS Global Public Health 4(1), e0002651. [CrossRef]
- Moniz, M. H. , & Beigi, R. H. (2014). Maternal immunization. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics. [CrossRef]
- PDF. (n.d.). Retrieved 27 November 2024, from https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR375/FR375_II.pdf.
- Quincer, E. M. , Cranmer, L. M., & Kamidani, S. (2024). Prenatal Maternal Immunization for Infant Protection: A Review of the Vaccines Recommended, Infant Immunity and Future Research Directions. Pathogens. [CrossRef]
- Rurangirwa, A. A. , Mogren, I., Nyirazinyoye, L., Ntaganira, J., & Krantz, G. (2017). Determinants of poor utilization of antenatal care services among recently delivered women in Rwanda; a population based study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. [CrossRef]
- Sahoo, K. C. , Negi, S., Patel, K., Mishra, B. K., Palo, S. K., & Pati, S. (2021). Challenges in Maternal and Child Health Services Delivery and Access during Pandemics or Public Health Disasters in Low-and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review. Healthcare. [CrossRef]
- Verma, R., Khanna, P., & Dhankar, M. (2016). Full article: Vaccination during pregnancy: Today’s need in India. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21645515.2015.1093265. [CrossRef]
- Wallace, A. S., Ryman, T. K., & Dietz, V. (2012). Experiences Integrating Delivery of Maternal and Child Health Services With Childhood Immunization Programs: Systematic Review Update | The Journal of Infectious Diseases | Oxford Academic. https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/205/suppl_1/S6/869196. [CrossRef]
- WHO, D. update. (2016). New guidelines on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. https://www.who.int/news/item/07-11-2016-new-guidelines-on-antenatal-care-for-a-positive-pregnancy-experience.
- Williams, A. L. , Mitrovich, R., Mwananyanda, L., & Gill, C. (2019). Full article: Maternal vaccine knowledge in low- and middle-income countries—And why it matters. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21645515.2018.1526589. [CrossRef]
- Yadav, A. K. , Sahni, B., Kumar, D., Bala, K., & Kalotra, A. (2021). Effect of Women’s and Partners’ Education on Maternal Health-care Services Utilization in Five Empowered Action Group States of India: An analysis of 13,443 Women of Reproductive Age. International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research. [CrossRef]
- Yaya, S. , Kota, K., Buh, A., & Bishwajit, G. (2019). Antenatal visits are positively associated with uptake of tetanus toxoid and intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy in Ivory Coast. BMC Public Health 19(1), 1467. [CrossRef] [PubMed]



| Variables | Percent (%) | Sample (N) |
|---|---|---|
| Antenatal Visits | ||
| No Visit | 6.2 | 11,462 |
| One Visit | 6.6 | 11,032 |
| Two Visits | 12.0 | 21,422 |
| Three Visits | 15.9 | 29,132 |
| Four And Above Visits | 59.3 | 1,01,435 |
| Tetanus Injection During Pregnancy | ||
| No Injection | 4.7 | 9,452 |
| One Injection | 11.6 | 20,492 |
| Two And Above Injections | 83.8 | 1,44,539 |
| Women Age Group | ||
| 15-19 | 3.1 | 4,817 |
| 20-24 | 29.2 | 48,160 |
| 25-29 | 38.8 | 66,884 |
| 30-34 | 19.6 | 35,785 |
| 35-39 | 7.2 | 14,331 |
| 40-44 | 1.6 | 3,540 |
| 45-49 | 0.4 | 966 |
| Women Education Level | ||
| No Education | 19.6 | 35,592 |
| Primary | 11.8 | 21,437 |
| Secondary | 51.4 | 91,314 |
| Higher | 17.2 | 26,140 |
| Place Of Residence | ||
| Urban | 28.1 | 37,392 |
| Rural | 71.9 | 1,37,091 |
| Wealth Index | ||
| Poorest | 22.8 | 44,314 |
| Poorer | 21.1 | 39,960 |
| Middle | 19.6 | 34,095 |
| Richer | 19.2 | 30,618 |
| Richest | 17.3 | 25,496 |
| Variables | No (%) | Yes (%) | Sample(N) | (p < .000) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antenatal visits | 0.000 | |||
| No Visit | 62.7 | 37.3 | 11,462 | |
| One Visit | 42.2 | 57.9 | 11,032 | |
| Two Visits | 36.1 | 63.9 | 21,422 | |
| Three Visits | 29.8 | 70.2 | 29,132 | |
| Four And Above Visits | 25.7 | 74.3 | 1,01,435 | |
| Tetanus injection during pregnancy | 0.000 | |||
| No Injection | 48.9 | 51.1 | 9,452 | |
| One Injection | 34.4 | 65.6 | 20,492 | |
| Two And Above Injections | 29.5 | 70.5 | 1,44,539 | |
| Women age group | 0.000 | |||
| 15-19 | 27.6 | 72.4 | 4,817 | |
| 20-24 | 28.1 | 71.9 | 48,160 | |
| 25-29 | 30.4 | 69.6 | 66,884 | |
| 30-34 | 33.9 | 66.1 | 35,785 | |
| 35-39 | 36.6 | 63.4 | 14,331 | |
| 40-44 | 41.2 | 58.8 | 3,540 | |
| 45-49 | 42.6 | 57.4 | 966 | |
| Women Education level | 0.000 | |||
| No Education | 35.6 | 64.4 | 35,592 | |
| Primary | 28.6 | 71.4 | 21,437 | |
| Secondary | 27.8 | 72.2 | 91,314 | |
| Higher | 36.8 | 63.3 | 26,140 | |
| Place of residence | 0.000 | |||
| Urban | 40.7 | 59.3 | 37,392 | |
| Rural | 27.2 | 72.8 | 1,37,091 | |
| Wealth Index | 0.000 | |||
| Poorest | 31.1 | 68.9 | 44,314 | |
| Poorer | 27.5 | 72.5 | 39,960 | |
| Middle | 26.6 | 73.4 | 34,095 | |
| Richer | 29.7 | 70.3 | 30,618 | |
| Richest | 41.5 | 58.5 | 25,496 |
| Variables | Odds ratio | P>z | [95% Confidence interval] |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antenatal visits | |||
| No Visit® | |||
| One Visit | 2.748 | 0.000 | (2.6-2.905) |
| Two Visits | 3.202 | 0.000 | (3.049-3.363) |
| Three Visits | 4.051 | 0.000 | (3.863-4.248) |
| Four And Above Visits | 5.501 | 0.000 | (5.267-5.744) |
| Tetanus injection during pregnancy | |||
| No Injection® | |||
| One Injection | 1.732 | 0.000 | (1.643-1.825) |
| Two And Above Injections | 2.001 | 0.000 | (1.913-2.094) |
| Women age group | |||
| 15-19® | |||
| 20-24 | 1.110 | 0.002 | (1.038-1.188) |
| 25-29 | 1.047 | 0.177 | (0.979-1.119) |
| 30-34 | 0.928 | 0.034 | (0.867-0.994) |
| 35-39 | 0.793 | 0.000 | (0.737-0.853) |
| 40-44 | 0.721 | 0.000 | (0.655-0.793) |
| 45-49 | 0.622 | 0.000 | (0.536-0.722) |
| Women Education level | |||
| No Education® | |||
| Primary | 1.093 | 0.000 | (1.052-1.136) |
| Secondary | 1.060 | 0.000 | (1.029-1.092) |
| Higher | 0.922 | 0.000 | (0.885-0.961) |
| Place of residence | |||
| Urban® | |||
| Rural | 1.696 | 0.000 | (1.649-1.744) |
| Wealth Index | |||
| Poorest® | |||
| Poorer | 0.995 | 0.753 | (0.964-1.027) |
| Middle | 1.054 | 0.003 | (1.018-1.091) |
| Richer | 1.046 | 0.017 | (1.008-1.086) |
| Richest | 0.831 | 0.000 | (0.796-0.866) |
| Note: ®Reference Category; p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**), p < 0.001 (***) | |||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).