Submitted:
13 January 2025
Posted:
14 January 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Several studies conducted worldwide have reported on the effectiveness of consistent condom use with lubricants in preventing HIV transmission and acquisition; however, Men who have sex with men (MSM) in Ghana continue to be disproportionately affected by the HIV burden. They are stigmatized, discriminated against, and criminalized, leading to social isolation, reduced access to health care, and inadequate targeted interventions. Educational campaigns on HIV prevention, dissemination of HIV prevention tools such as condoms and lubricants, and scientific research are also mainly focused on the general population, and this approach overlooks the specific needs and vulnerabilities of MSM. Currently, there is no published record on the prevalence and associated factors of consistent condom use with lubricants among the MSM population in Ghana. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and associated factors of consistent condom use with lubricants among MSM in Ghana. We analyzed cross-sectional data from the Ghana Men's Study II dataset involving 4,095 MSM aged 18 years and above. De-identified data was imported into STATA (College Station, TX, USA, software version 17) for data cleaning and processing. Before the analysis, the data was treated for missing information and outliers. Descriptive analysis was performed to describe relevant characteristics of the study population, such as socio-demographic/socio-economic variables, behavioral practices, and condom use behavior. Bivariate analysis was conducted to determine the relationship between consistent condom use with lubricants and the study variables. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was then performed for significant variables in bivariate analysis to determine the associated factors of consistent condom use with lubricants. All the statistical analyses were performed at a 95% confidence interval, with significant differences at p<0.05. The prevalence of consistent condom use with lubricants during penetrative anal sex was highest with male partners (44.9%), followed by female partners (40.0%), and all sexual partners 38.9% respectively. More than half of MSM (55.1%) used lubricants consistently during anal sex. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, having a senior high school education (AOR: 1.76; 95% CI: 0.88-3.12, p=0.039), tertiary education or higher (AOR: 2.24; 95% CI: 0.86-3.23, p=0.041), Being an insertive sex partner (AOR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.02-1.56, p= 0.029), being a sex worker (AOR: 3.42; 95% CI: 1.38-8.46, p=0.008), bought sex from other males (AOR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.03-1.70, p=0.027), being a light drinker (AOR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.42-0.68, p˂0.001), moderate drinkers (AOR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.30-0.78, p=0.003), and good HIV knowledge (AOR: 1.79; 95% CI: 1.46-2.20, p˂0.001) had higher odds of consistent condom use with lubricants. Being Islamic (AOR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0 .45-0.71, p˂0.001), low income (AOR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.49-0.78, p˂0.001), and easy access (AOR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.37-0.72, p˂0.001) to condoms were positively associated with consistent condom use. This study found a low prevalence of consistent condom use with lubricants among the MSM population in Ghana. The study also found a range of socio-demographic, behavioral, and structural factors associated with consistent condom use with lubricants. This calls for very specific and unique public health interventions, such as developing a predictive model to identify and mitigate barriers to consistent condom use with lubricants.
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design and Study Setting
2.2. Study Population
2.3. Sample Size and Data Collection Process
| Research measures | Indicator |
|---|---|
| Outcome variable | |
| Self-reported consistent condom use with lubricants | A likert type scale was used with five response categories, namely: Always, Most of the time, Sometimes, Rarely, and Never. Men who have sex with men who reported "always using condoms with lubricants" during sexual intercourse with all male and female partners were considered synonymous with consistent condom use with lubricants. Since a single act of condomless sex might expose one to HIV and other sexually transmitted infections, MSM who reported using condoms with lubricants "most of the time," "sometimes," and "rarely" were also classified as inconsistent users. Those who reported "never" to condom use were dropped and excluded from the analysis since our focus is condom users (consistent and inconsistent users). For this analysis, condom use with lubricant variables was recategorized into two; “yes” (consistent users) and “no” (inconsistent users). |
| Exposure variables | |
| Types of sexual partners | Types of sexual partners, e.g., regular/main partner (the participant's devoted partner, such as spouse, lover, or boyfriend); Paying partner (person who made payment to the participant in either cash, goods, or services in exchange for sex); selling partner (person who receives payment in the form of money, goods, or services in exchange for sex); casual partner (an unfamiliar individual, a friend, or acquaintance with whom the participant had sex but is not considered a regular or paying partner); all sexual partners (male and female sexual partners) |
| Socio-demographic factors |
|
| Socio-economic factors |
|
| Behavioral factors |
|
| Clinical factors |
|
| Structural factors |
|
2.4. Data Analyses
2.5. Ethical Considerations
3. Results
3.1. Socio-demographic and Socio-economic Characteristics
3.2. Sexual Orientation and Behavioral Practices Among Men who have Sex with Men
3.3. Condom Use at Last Sex among Ghanaian Men who have Sex with Men
3.4. Consistent Condom with Lubricant Use Among Men who have Sex with Men
3.5. Associated Factors of Consistent Condom Use with Lubricants Among Men who have Sex with Men in Ghana
4. Discussion
4.1. Overview
4.2. Main Findings
4.3. Strengths and Limitations
4.4. Practical Implications
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Appendix B
References
- Beyrer C, Sullivan P, Sanchez J, Baral SD, Collins C, Wirtz AL, et al. The increase in global HIV epidemics in MSM. AIDS [Internet]. 2013 Nov 13 [cited 2024 Oct 19];27(17):2665–78. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih. 2384.
- Havlir, D.; Beyrer, C. The Beginning of the End of AIDS? New Engl. J. Med. 2012, 367, 685–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yi, S.; Tuot, S.; Chhoun, P.; Pal, K.; Tith, K.; Brody, C. Factors Associated with Inconsistent Condom Use among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Cambodia. PLOS ONE 2015, 10, e0136114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guure, C.; Afagbedzi, S.; Torpey, K. Willingness to take and ever use of pre-exposure prophylaxis among female sex workers in Ghana. Medicine 2022, 101, e28798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mimiaga MJ, Case P, Johnson C V., Safren SA, Mayer KH. Pre-Exposure Antiretroviral Prophylaxis (PrEP) attitudes in high risk Boston area MSM: Limited knowledge and experience, but potential for increased utilization after education. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr [Internet]. 2009 Jan 1 [cited 2024 Oct 19];50(1):77. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih. 2659.
- Eakle R, Venter F, Rees H. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in an era of stalled HIV prevention: Can it change the game? Retrovirology [Internet]. 2018 Apr 2 [cited 2024 Oct 19];15(1):29. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih. 5879.
- Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). Fact sheet 2024 - Latest global and regional HIV statistics on the status of the AIDS epidemic. 2024; Available from: https://www.unaids.
- Idindili, B.M.; King, S.J.; Stolka, K.; Mashasi, I.; Bashosho, P.; Karungula, H.; Chintowa, F.; Mwakabole, G.; Ashburn, K.; Do, B.; et al. HIV care and treatment clinic performance following President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief-funded infrastructure improvement in Tanzania. South. Afr. J. HIV Med. 2018, 19, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goldstein, D.; Salvatore, M.; Ferris, R.; Phelps, B.R.; Minior, T. Integrating global HIV services with primary health care: a key step in sustainable HIV epidemic control. Lancet Glob. Heal. 2023, 11, e1120–e1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- HIV/AIDS JUNP, on. Global report : UNAIDS report on the global AIDS epidemic 2013. >; 2013.
- Beyrer, C.; Baral, S.D.; van Griensven, F.; Goodreau, S.M.; Chariyalertsak, S.; Wirtz, A.L.; Brookmeyer, R. Global epidemiology of HIV infection in men who have sex with men. 380. [CrossRef]
- Altman, D.; Aggleton, P.; Williams, M.; Kong, T.; Reddy, V.; Harrad, D.; Reis, T.; Parker, R. Men who have sex with men: stigma and discrimination. Lancet 2012, 380, 439–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trapence, G.; Collins, C.; Avrett, S.; Carr, R.; Sanchez, H.; Ayala, G.; Diouf, D.; Beyrer, C.; Baral, S.D. From personal survival to public health: community leadership by men who have sex with men in the response to HIV. 380. [CrossRef]
- Baggaley, R.F.; White, R.G.; Boily, M.-C. HIV transmission risk through anal intercourse: systematic review, meta-analysis and implications for HIV prevention. Leuk. Res. 2010, 39, 1048–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, F.; Jansson, J.; Law, M.; Prestage, G.P.; Zablotska, I.; Imrie, J.C.; Kippax, S.C.; Kaldor, J.M.; E Grulich, A.; Wilson, D.P. Per-contact probability of HIV transmission in homosexual men in Sydney in the era of HAART. AIDS 2010, 24, 907–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boily, M.-C.; Baggaley, R.F.; Wang, L.; Masse, B.; White, R.G.; Hayes, R.J.; Alary, M. Heterosexual risk of HIV-1 infection per sexual act: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2009, 9, 118–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baral, S.; Trapence, G.; Motimedi, F.; Umar, E.; Iipinge, S.; Dausab, F.; Beyrer, C. HIV Prevalence, Risks for HIV Infection, and Human Rights among Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) in Malawi, Namibia, and Botswana. PLOS ONE 2009, 4, e4997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mayer KH, Wheeler DP, Bekker LG, Grinsztejn B, Remien RH, Sandfort TGM, et al. Overcoming Biological, Behavioral and Structural Vulnerabilities: New Directions in Research to Decrease HIV Transmission in Men who have Sex with Men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr [Internet]. 2013 Jul 1 [cited 2024 Oct 20];63(0 2):S161. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih. 3740.
- Holland, C.E.; Papworth, E.; Billong, S.C.; Kassegne, S.; Petitbon, F.; Mondoleba, V.; Moukam, L.V.; Macauley, I.; Ntsama, S.P.E.; Yomb, Y.R.; et al. Access to HIV Services at Non-Governmental and Community-Based Organizations among Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) in Cameroon: An Integrated Biological and Behavioral Surveillance Analysis. PLOS ONE 2015, 10, e0122881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Beyrer, C. Global Prevention of HIV Infection for Neglected Populations: Men Who Have Sex with Men. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2010, 50, S108–S113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fay, H.; Baral, S.D.; Trapence, G.; Motimedi, F.; Umar, E.; Iipinge, S.; Dausab, F.; Wirtz, A.; Beyrer, C. Stigma, Health Care Access, and HIV Knowledge Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in Malawi, Namibia, and Botswana. AIDS Behav. 2010, 15, 1088–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rebe, K.; Semugoma, P.; McIntyre, J.A. New HIV prevention technologies and their relevance to MARPS in African epidemics. SAHARA-J: J. Soc. Asp. HIV/AIDS 2012, 9, 164–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dramé, F.M.; Peitzmeier, S.; Lopes, M.; Ndaw, M.; Sow, A.; Diouf, D.; Baral, S. Gay men and other men who have sex with men in West Africa: evidence from the field. Cult. Heal. Sex. 2013, 15, 7–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghana AIDS Commission. Ghana Aids Commission Ghana Men ’ S Study II. 2017; Available from: https://www.ghanaids.gov.gh/mcadmin/Uploads/Ghana Men%27s Study Report(2).
- Abu-Ba’are, G.R.; Shamrock, O.W.; Apreku, A.; Agbemedu, G.R.K.; Zigah, E.Y.; Ezechi, O.C.; Nelson, L.E.; Torpey, K. Awareness and Willingness to use Condoms and Preexposure Prophylaxis among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Cisgendered Men who Have sex with men in Slum Communities in Ghana. BSGH-004. J. Int. Assoc. Provid. AIDS Care (JIAPAC) 2023, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Condom fact sheet. Usaid [Internet]. 2015;26(April):1–2. Available from: https://2012-2017.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/1864/condom-fact-sheet-January-2015.
- Wiyeh, A.B.; Mome, R.K.B.; Mahasha, P.W.; Kongnyuy, E.J.; Wiysonge, C.S. Effectiveness of the female condom in preventing HIV and sexually transmitted infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Heal. 2020, 20, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giannou, F.K.; Tsiara, C.G.; Nikolopoulos, G.K.; Talias, M.; Benetou, V.; Kantzanou, M.; Bonovas, S.; Hatzakis, A. Condom effectiveness in reducing heterosexual HIV transmission: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on HIV serodiscordant couples. Expert Rev. Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res. 2015, 16, 489–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vittinghoff E, Douglas J, Judson F, McKirnan D, Macqueen K, Buchbinder SR. Per-contact risk of human immunodeficiency virus transmission between male sexual partners. Am J Epidemiol [Internet]. 1999 Aug 1 [cited 2024 Oct 20];150(3):306–11. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih. 1043.
- Cai, Y.; Lau, J.T.F. Multi-dimensional factors associated with unprotected anal intercourse with regular partners among Chinese men who have sex with men in Hong Kong: a respondent-driven sampling survey. BMC Infect. Dis. 2014, 14, 205–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramanathan, S.; Chakrapani, V.; Ramakrishnan, L.; Goswami, P.; Yadav, D.; Subramanian, T.; George, B.; Paranjape, R. Consistent condom use with regular, paying, and casual male partners and associated factors among men who have sex with men in Tamil Nadu, India: findings from an assessment of a large-scale HIV prevention program. BMC Public Heal. 2013, 13, 827–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Lu, H.; Pan, S.W.; Xia, D.; Zhao, Y.; Xiao, Y.; He, X.; Yue, H.; Sun, Z.; Xu, Y.; et al. Correlates of Unprotected Anal Intercourse: The Influence of Anal Sex Position Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Beijing, China. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2014, 44, 375–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, D.; Li, C.; Wang, Z.; Lau, J.T.F. Prevalence and Associated Factors of Unprotected Anal Intercourse with Regular Male Sex Partners among HIV Negative Men Who Have Sex with Men in China: A Cross-Sectional Survey. PLOS ONE 2015, 10, e0119977–e0119977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deshpande, S.; Bharat, S. Sexual partner mixing and differentials in consistent condom use among men who have sex with men in Maharashtra, India. Glob. Public Heal. 2014, 10, 103–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lau, J.T.; Cai, W.; Tsui, H.Y.; Chen, L.; Cheng, J.; Lin, C.; Gu, J.; Hao, C. Unprotected anal intercourse behavior and intention among male sex workers in Shenzhen serving cross-boundary male clients coming from Hong Kong, China – prevalence and associated factors. AIDS Care 2011, 24, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ramanathan, S.; Chakrapani, V.; Ramakrishnan, L.; Goswami, P.; Yadav, D.; George, B.; Sen, S.; Rachakulla, H.; Subramanian, T.; Paranjape, R.S. Factors Associated with Use of Latex Condom-Compatible Lubricants by Men Who Have Sex with Men in India: Implications for HIV Prevention. J. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2013, 2013, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ajayi, A.I.; Ismail, K.O.; Akpan, W. Factors associated with consistent condom use: a cross-sectional survey of two Nigerian universities. BMC Public Heal. 2019, 19, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Russell, C.; Tahlil, K.; Davis, M.; Winston, A.; Amaambo, T.; Hamunime, N.; Pietersen, I.; Jordan, M.R.; Tang, A.M.; Hong, S.Y. Barriers to condom use among key populations in Namibia. Int. J. STD AIDS 2019, 30, 1417–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdulai, R.; Phalane, E.; Atuahene, K.; Phaswana-Mafuya, R.N. Consistent Condom and Lubricant Use and Associated Factors Amongst Men Who Have Sex with Men in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review. Sexes 2024, 5, 796–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdulai, R.; Phalane, E.; Atuahene, K.; Phaswana-Mafuya, R.N. Consistent and Correct Use of Condoms With Lubricants and Associated Factors Among Men Who Have Sex With Men from the Ghana Men’s Study II: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Res. Protoc. 2024, 13, e63276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- United Nations Joint Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). Fact Sheet—Global AIDS Updatate. 2019; United Nations Joint Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS): Geneva, Switzerland, 2019; Available online: https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/UNAIDS_FactSheet_en.pdf (accessed on 20 November 2019).
- UNAIDS. Country Progress Report on 90-90-90 -Ghana. Glob AIDS Monit 2019 [Internet]. 2019;1–42. Available from: https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/country/documents/GHA_2019_countryreport.
- McCreesh, N.; Tarsh, M.N.; Seeley, J.; Katongole, J.; White, R.G. Community understanding of respondent-driven sampling in a medical research setting in Uganda: importance for the use of RDS for public health research. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 2013, 16, 269–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strömdahl, S.; Williams, A.O.; Eziefule, B.; Emmanuel, G.; Iwuagwu, S.; Anene, O.; Orazulike, I.; Beyrer, C.; Baral, S. Associations of Consistent Condom Use Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Abuja, Nigeria. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 2012, 28, 1756–1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, D.-C.; Wu, Z.-Y.; Scott, S.R. Factors associated with unprotected anal intercourse among male students who have sex with men in three Northern regions of China. Chin. Med J. 2019, 132, 1639–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- D’anna LH, Warner L, Margolis AD, Korosteleva OA, O’donnell L, Rietmeijer CA, et al. Consistency of Condom Use during Receptive Anal Intercourse Among Women and Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM): Findings from the Safe in the City Behavioral Study. Sex Transm Dis [Internet]. 2015 Jul 11 [cited 2024 Nov 8];42(7):393. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih. 8600.
- Wang, H.; Yu, S.; Cross, W.; Lam, L.; Banik, B.; Zhang, K. Condom Use Consistency and Associated Factors Among College Student Men Who Have Sex with Men from Seven Colleges in Changsha City: A Cross-Sectional Survey. HIV/AIDS - Res. Palliat. Care, 13. [CrossRef]
- Jiang, H.; Chen, X.; Li, J.; Tan, Z.; Cheng, W.; Yang, Y. Predictors of condom use behavior among men who have sex with men in China using a modified information-motivation-behavioral skills (IMB) model. BMC Public Heal. 2019, 19, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sohn A, Cho B. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Sexual Behaviors in HIV/AIDS and Predictors Affecting Condom Use among Men Who Have Sex with Men in South Korea. Osong Public Heal Res Perspect [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2024 Nov 9];3(3):156. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih. 3738.
- Chow, E.P.F.; Wilson, D.P.; Zhang, L. Patterns of Condom Use Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AIDS Behav. 2011, 16, 653–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- O Hill, A.; Bavinton, B.R.; Armstrong, G. Prevalence and Factors Associated with Inconsistent Condom Use among Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) Who Use Mobile Geo-Social Networking Applications in Greater Tokyo. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Heal. 2018, 15, 2815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olawore, O.; Crowell, T.A.; Ketende, S.C.; Ramadhani, H.O.; Liu, H.; Ake, J.A.; Kokogho, A.; Adebajo, S.; Charurat, M.E.; Nowak, R.G.; et al. Individual and partnership characteristics associated with consistent condom use in a cohort of cisgender men who have sex with men and transgender women in Nigeria. BMC Public Heal. 2021, 21, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahinkorah, B.O.; Budu, E.; Seidu, A.-A.; Hagan, J.E.; Agbaglo, E.; Hormenu, T.; Schack, T.; Yaya, S. Consistent condom use among men who pay for sex in sub-Saharan Africa: Empirical evidence from Demographic and Health Surveys. PLOS ONE 2020, 15, e0236552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, D.K.; Herbst, J.H.; Zhang, X.; Rose, C.E. Condom Effectiveness for HIV Prevention by Consistency of Use Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States. Am. J. Ther. 2015, 68, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. Other STDs and Associated Conditions How to Use a Condom Consistently and Correctly : 2016;1–2.
- Adu-Oppong, A.; Grimes, R.M.; Ross, M.W.; Risser, J.; Kessie, G. Social and Behavioral Determinants of Consistent Condom Use Among Female Commercial Sex Workers in Ghana. AIDS Educ. Prev. 2007, 19, 160–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Magalhães R de LB, Sousa LRM, Gir E, Galvão MTG, de Oliveira VMC, Reis RK. Factors associated to inconsistent condom use among sex workers. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2024 Nov 9];27:e3226. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih. 6896.
- John Cleland, BF. Sexual Behaviour and AIDS in the Developing World. Sex Behav AIDS Dev World. 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Wangmu C, Lamu S, Wangmu D, Wangmu C, Lamu S, Wangmu D. AIDS knowledge and condom use among female sex workers in Tibet Autonomous Region: a cross-sectional survey. Chinese J Public Heal 2021, Vol 37, Issue 8, Pages 1214-1218 [Internet]. 2021 Aug 31 [cited 2024 Nov 9];37(8):1214–8. Available from: https://www.zgggws.com/en/article/doi/10.11847/zgggws1128264.
- Kong, T.S.K. Risk factors affecting condom use among male sex workers who serve men in China: a qualitative study. Sex. Transm. Infect. 2008, 84, 444–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, D.; Jia, Y.; Ruan, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, Q.; Liang, H.; Zhou, Z.; Luo, F.; Zhang, X.; Jiang, S.; et al. Correlates of Incident Infections for HIV, Syphilis, and Hepatitis B Virus in A Cohort of Men Who Have Sex with Men in Beijing. AIDS Patient Care STDs 2010, 24, 595–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Holloway, I.W. Substance Use Homophily Among Geosocial Networking Application Using Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2015, 44, 1799–1811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rice E, Holloway I, Winetrobe H, Rhoades H, Barman-Adhikari A, Gibbs J, et al. Sex risk among young men who have sex with men who use Grindr, a smartphone geosocial networking application. J AIDS Clin Res. 2012;3(SPL ISSUE4).
- Cai, Y.; Lau, J.T.F. Multi-dimensional factors associated with unprotected anal intercourse with regular partners among Chinese men who have sex with men in Hong Kong: a respondent-driven sampling survey. BMC Infect. Dis. 2014, 14, 205–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barrón-Limón, S.; Semple, S.J.; A Strathdee, S.; Lozada, R.; Vargas-Ojeda, A.; Patterson, T.L. Correlates of unprotected anal sex among men who have sex with men in Tijuana, Mexico. BMC Public Heal. 2012, 12, 433–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geoffrion, L. How Alcohol Can Impair Judgement Why Does Alcohol Impair Judgement and Lower Inhibitions ? Poor Decision-Making While Under the Influence of Alcohol. Amerircan Addict Centers [Internet]. 2023;1–9. Available from: https://alcohol.
- The MASH Research Team; Scott-Sheldon, L. A.J.; Carey, K.B.; Cunningham, K.; Johnson, B.T.; Carey, M.P. Alcohol Use Predicts Sexual Decision-Making: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Experimental Literature. AIDS Behav. 2015, 20, 19–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shuper, P.A.; Joharchi, N.; Irving, H.; Rehm, J. Alcohol as a Correlate of Unprotected Sexual Behavior Among People Living with HIV/AIDS: Review and Meta-Analysis. AIDS Behav. 2009, 13, 1021–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andrews, C.H.; Faxelid, E.; Sychaerun, V.; Phrasisombath, K. Determinants of consistent condom use among female sex workers in Savannakhet, Lao PDR. BMC Women's Heal. 2015, 15, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eluwa, G.I.; Adebajo, S.B.; Eluwa, T.; Ogbanufe, O.; Ilesanmi, O.; Nzelu, C. Rising HIV prevalence among men who have sex with men in Nigeria: a trend analysis. BMC Public Heal. 2019, 19, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdulai, R.; Phalane, E.; Atuahene, K.; Phaswana-Mafuya, R.N. Consistent Condom and Lubricant Use and Associated Factors Amongst Men Who Have Sex with Men in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review. Sexes 2024, 5, 796–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, M.; Sandfort, T.; Collier, K.; Lane, T.; Reddy, V. Breakage is the norm: use of condoms and lubrication in anal sex among Black South African men who have sex with men. Cult. Heal. Sex. 2016, 19, 501–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Renzi C, Tabet SR, Stucky JA, Eaton N, Coletti AS, Surawicz CM, et al. Safety and acceptability of the RealityTM condom for anal sex among men who have sex with men. Aids. 2003;17(5):727–31.
- Mansergh, G.; Naorat, S.; Jommaroeng, R.; Jenkins, R.A.; Stall, R.; Jeeyapant, S.; Phanuphak, P.; Tappero, J.W.; van Griensven, F. Inconsistent Condom Use with Steady and Casual Partners and Associated Factors among Sexually-Active Men who Have Sex with Men in Bangkok, Thailand. AIDS Behav. 2006, 10, 743–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ruan, S.; Yang, H.; Zhu, Y.; Ma, Y.; Li, J.; Zhao, J.; McFarland, W.; Raymond, H.F. HIV Prevalence and Correlates of Unprotected Anal Intercourse Among Men Who Have Sex with Men, Jinan, China. AIDS Behav. 2008, 12, 469–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chandra, Prabha S; Desai, Geetha; Ranjan S. HIV & psychiatric disorders [Internet]. 2005. p. pp 451-467. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih. 1581.
- Piot, B.; Mukherjee, A.; Navin, D.; Krishnan, N.; Bhardwaj, A.; Sharma, V.; Marjara, P. Lot quality assurance sampling for monitoring coverage and quality of a targeted condom social marketing programme in traditional and non-traditional outlets in India. Sex. Transm. Infect. 2010, 86, i56–i61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verma, R.; Shekhar, A.; Khobragade, S.; Adhikary, R.; George, B.; Ramesh, B.M.; Ranebennur, V.; Mondal, S.; Patra, R.K.; Srinivasan, S.; et al. Scale-up and coverage of Avahan: a large-scale HIV-prevention programme among female sex workers and men who have sex with men in four Indian states. Sex. Transm. Infect. 2010, 86, i76–i82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
| Variables | Consistent condom use with lubricants | Total %(n) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes n (%) | No n (%) | ||
| Age category | |||
| 18-24 | 949 (37.85) | 1,558 (62.15) | 2,507 (63.65) |
| 25-34 | 488 (39.23) | 756 (60.77) | 1,244 (31.58) |
| 35+ | 67 (35.64) | 121 (64.36) | 188 (4.77) |
| Total | 1,504 (38.18) | 2,435 (61.82) | 3,939 (100.00) |
| Educational level attained | |||
| Less than primary | 49 (28.32) | 124 (71.68) | 173 (4.30) |
| Primary school | 52 (37.41) | 87 (62.59) | 139 (3.46) |
| Junior High school | 397 (36.22) | 699 (63.78) | 1,096 (27.27) |
| Secondary school | 847 (39.80) | 1,281 (60.20) | 2,128 (52.95) |
| Tertiary or higher | 214 (44.31) | 269 (55.69) | 483 (12.02) |
| Total | 1,559 (38.79) | 2,460 (61.21) | 4,019 (100.00) |
| Marital status | |||
| Single/Never Married | 1,484 (38.95) | 2,326 (61.05) | 3,810 (94.15) |
| Married/living with a woman | 59 (32.96) | 120 (67.04) | 179 (4.42) |
| Widowed/Divorced/Separated | 22 (37.93) | 36 (62.07) | 58 (1.43) |
| Total | 1,565 (38.67) | 2,482 (61.33) | 4,047 (100.00) |
| Employment | |||
| Unemployed | 700 (41.62) | 982 (58.38) | 1,682 (42.19) |
| Informal | 349 (39.57) | 533 (60.43) | 882 (22.12) |
| Formal | 288 (34.45) | 548 (65.55) | 836 (20.97) |
| Sex worker | 14 (50.0) | 14 (50.0) | 28 (0.70) |
| Other | 202 (36.14) | 357 (63.86) | 559 (14.02) |
| Total | 1,553 (38.95) | 2,434 (61.05) | 3,987 (100.00) |
| Religion | |||
| Christianity | 1,142 (40.61) | 1,670 (59.39) | 2,812 (69.69) |
| Islamic | 139 (26.99) | 376 (73.01) | 515 (12.76) |
| Traditional | 29 (30.85) | 65 (69.15) | 94 (2.33) |
| Other | 205 (43.80) | 263 (56.20) | 468 (11.60) |
| No religion | 49 (33.56) | 97 (66.44) | 146 (3.62) |
| Total | 1,564 (38.76) | 2,471 (61.24) | 4,035 (100.00) |
| Income status (GHS) | |||
| No Income | 643 (44.97) | 787 (55.03) | 1,430 (36.99) |
| Low Income (1-599 cedis/month) | 660 (35.95) | 1,176 (64.05) | 1,836 (47.49) |
| Middle Income (600-999 cedis/month) | 106 (36.43) | 185 (63.57) | 291 (7.53) |
| High come (≥1000 cedis/month) | 115 (37.22) | 194 (62.78) | 309 (7.99) |
| Total | 1,524 (39.42) | 2,342 (60.58) | 3,866 (100.00) |
| Variables | Consistent condom use with lubricants | Total %(n) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes n (%) | No n (%) | ||
| Sexual identity/orientation | |||
| Gay | 639 (38.84) | 1,006 (61.16) | 1,645 (43.13) |
| Bisexual | 654 (37.54) | 1,088 (62.46) | 1,742 (45.67) |
| Transgender | 9 (31.03) | 20 (68.97) | 29 (0.76) |
| Other | 200 (50.25) | 198 (49.75) | 398 (10.44) |
| Total | 1,502 (39.38) | 2,312 (60.62) | 3,814 (100.00) |
| Type of anal sexual intercourse | |||
| Insertive anal sex | 661 (42.54) | 893 (57.46) | 1,554 (44.41) |
| Receptive anal sex | 350 (40.46) | 515 (59.54) | 865 (24.72) |
| Versatile sex | 357 (33.06) | 723 (66.94) | 1,080 (30.87) |
| Total | 1,368 (39.10) | 2,131 (60.90) | 3,499 (100.00) |
| Bought sex from a male in the past six months | |||
| Yes | 228 (33.53) | 452 (66.47) | 680 (17.44) |
| No | 1,283 (39.84) | 1,937 (60.16) | 3,220 (82.56) |
| Total | 1,511 (38.74) | 2,389 (61.26) | 3,900 (100.00) |
| Bought sex from a female in the past six months | |||
| Yes | 78 (31.20) | 172 (68.80) | 250 (25.20) |
| No | 228 (30.73) | 514 (69.27) | 742 (74.80) |
| Total | 306 (30.85) | 686 (69.15) | 992 (100.00) |
| Sold sex to a male in the past six months | |||
| Yes | 433 (37.49) | 722 (62.51) | 1,155 (29.86) |
| No | 1,059 (39.03) | 1,654 (60.97) | 2,713 (70.14) |
| Total | 1,492 (38.57) | 2,376 (61.43) | 3,868 (100.00) |
| Sold sex to a female in the past six months | |||
| Yes | 42 (28.57) | 105 (71.43) | 147 (15.03) |
| No | 257 (30.93) | 574 (69.07) | 831 (84.97) |
| Total | 299 (30.57) | 679 (69.43) | 978 (10.00) |
| Alcohol intake | |||
| Abstainers | 1,265 (42.22) | 1,731 (57.78) | 2,996 (74.62) |
| Light drinker | 229 (28.99) | 561 (71.01) | 790 (19.68) |
| Moderate drinker | 36 (24.00) | 114 (76.00) | 150 (3.73) |
| Heavy drinker | 22 (27.85) | 57 (72.15) | 79 (1.97) |
| Total | 1,552 (38.66) | 2,463 (61.34) | 4,015 (100.00) |
| Variables | Number (n) | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Condom use at last sex with main/regular male partner a | ||
| No main/regular male partner | 550 | 13.9 |
| Yes | 2,288 | 67.1 |
| No | 1,123 | 32.9 |
| Sub-total | 3,411 | 100.0 |
| Condom use at last sex with a casual male partner b | ||
| No casual male partner | 1,588 | 40.2 |
| Yes | 1,574 | 66.6 |
| No | 789 | 33.4 |
| Sub-total | 2,363 | 100.0 |
| Condom use at last sold sex to a male in exchange for money c | ||
| Have not sold sex to a male in exchange for money | 2,325 | 58.8 |
| Yes | 1,091 | 67.0 |
| No | 538 | 33.0 |
| Sub-total | 1,629 | 100.0 |
| Condom use at last bought sex with a male d | ||
| Do not have a male from whom I bought sex in exchange for money | 2,856 | 72.03 |
| Yes | 699 | 63.0 |
| No | 410 | 37.0 |
| Sub-total | 1,109 | 100.0 |
| Condom use at last sex with a male from whom you received gifts or goods, e | ||
| Do not have a man I received gifts or goods in exchange for sex | 2,574 | 64.8 |
| Yes | 948 | 67.9 |
| No | 449 | 32.1 |
| Sub-total | 1,397 | 100.0 |
| Condom use at last sex with a male to whom you gave gifts or goods for sex f | ||
| Do not have a man I gave gifts or goods in exchange for sex | 2,946 | 74.3 |
| Yes | 648 | 63.7 |
| No | 370 | 36.3 |
| Sub-total | 1,018 | 100.0 |
| Condom use at last sex with a main female partner g | ||
| Do not have a female partner | 1,743 | 43.9 |
| Do not have a main female partner | 315 | 7.9 |
| Yes | 893 | 46.6 |
| No | 1,022 | 53.4 |
| Sub-total | 1,915 | 100.0 |
| Condom use at last sex with a casual female partner h | ||
| Do not have a female partner | 1,743 | 43.7 |
| Do not have a casual female partner | 1,259 | 31.6 |
| Yes | 537 | 54.5 |
| No | 448 | 45.5 |
| Sub-total | 985 | 100.0 |
| Condom use at last sold sex to a female for money I | ||
| Have not sold sex to a female in exchange for money | 3,344 | 83.7 |
| Yes | 368 | 56.6 |
| No | 282 | 43.4 |
| Sub-total | 650 | 100.0 |
| Condom use at last sex with a man or a woman | ||
| Yes | 2,409 | 61.9 |
| No | 1,482 | 38.1 |
| Total | 3,891 | 100.0 |
| Variables | Number (n) | Percentage (%) |
| How often do you use condoms with lubricants when you have sex with a man or a woman? | ||
| Always | 1,559 | 38.9 |
| Most of the time | 824 | 20.6 |
| Sometimes | 985 | 24.6 |
| Rarely | 286 | 7.1 |
| Never | 354 | 8.8 |
| Total | 4008 | 100.0 |
| How often do you use condoms with lubricants when you have penetrative anal sex with other males? | ||
| Always | 1,795 | 44.9 |
| Most of the time | 505 | 12.6 |
| Sometimes | 870 | 21.8 |
| Rarely | 244 | 6.1 |
| Never | 582 | 14.6 |
| Total | 3,996 | 100.0 |
| How often do you use condoms with lubricants when you have penetrative anal sex with females? | ||
| Always | 1,104 | 40.0 |
| Most of the time | 271 | 9.8 |
| Sometimes | 621 | 22.4 |
| Rarely | 236 | 8.5 |
| Never | 535 | 19.3 |
| Total | 2,767 | 100.0 |
| How often do you use lubricants for anal sex? | ||
| Always | 2,207 | 55.1 |
| Most of the time | 507 | 12.6 |
| Sometimes | 636 | 15.9 |
| Rarely | 105 | 2.6 |
| Never | 553 | 13.8 |
| Total | 4008 | 100.0 |
| Variables | Bivariate analysis | Multivariable analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % (n) | Unadjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI) | p-value | Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI) | p-value | |
| Age category | |||||
| 18-24 | 62.96 (1,406) | REF | |||
| 25-34 | 33.32 (744) | 1.09 (0.91-1.31) | 0.333 | ||
| 35+ | 3.72 (83) | 1.07 (0.68-1.69) | 0.774 | ||
| Educational level | |||||
| Less than primary | 2.28 (51) | REF | REF | ||
| Primary school | 3.00 (67) | 1.55 (0.92-2.57) | 0.093 | 1.16 (0.52-2.61) | 0.717 |
| Junior High school | 26.11(583) | 1.47 (1.00-2.15) | 0.052 | 1.58 (0.83-3.00) | 0.164 |
| Senior High school | 55.44 (1,238) | 1.66 (1.15-2.42) | 0.006* | 1.76 (0.88-3.12) | 0.039* |
| Tertiary or higher | 13.17 (294) | 1.99 (1.33-3.00) | 0.012* | 2.24 (0.86-3.23) | 0.041* |
| Marital status | |||||
| Married/living with a woman | 4.75 (106) | REF | |||
| Single/Never Married | 94.04 (2,100) | 1.42 (0.93-2.17) | 0.103 | ||
| Widowed/Divorced/Separated | 1.21 (27) | 1.59 (0.66-3.80) | 0.298 | ||
| Employment | |||||
| Unemployed | 39.23 (876) | REF | REF | ||
| Employed | 45.77 (1,022) | 0.75 (0.62-0.90) | 0.002** | 1.17 (0.85-1.59) | 0.336 |
| Sex worker | 15.00 (335) | 0.83 (0.64-1.07) | 0.150 | 1.41 (1.00-1.98) | 0.048* |
| Religion | |||||
| Christianity | 73.13 (1,633) | REF | REF | ||
| Islamic | 12.94 (289) | 0.64 (0.48-0.84) | 0.001** | 0.65 (0.49-0.87) | 0.004** |
| Traditional | 1.75 (39) | 0.69 (0.35-1.37) | 0.289 | 0.78 (0.38-1.60) | 0.496 |
| Other | 9.40 (210) | 1.19 (0.89-1.59) | 0.249 | 1.14 (0 .83-1.55) | 0.418 |
| No religion | 2.78 (62) | 0.54 (0.30- 0.96) | 0.036* | 0.66 (0.36-1.21) | 0.181 |
| Income status (GHS) | |||||
| No Income | 32.38 (723) | REF | REF | ||
| Low Income (1-599 cedis/month) | 50.47 (1,127) | 0.58 (0.48-0.70) | ˂0.001*** | 0.57 (0.42-0.77) | ˂0.001*** |
| Middle Income (600-999 cedis/month) | 7.61 (170) | 0.73 (0.52-1.02) | 0.069 | 0.65 (0.42-1.02) | 0.062 |
| High come (≥1000 cedis/month) | 9.54 (213) | 0.78 (0.57-1.07) | 0.126 | 0.75 (0.49-1.16) | 0.195 |
| Sexual identity/orientation | |||||
| Gay | 41.51 (927) | REF | REF | ||
| Bisexual | 47.11 (1,052) | 0.85 (0. 71-1.02) | 0.083 | 0.89 (0.73-1.09) | 0.275 |
| Transgender | 0.31 (7) | 4.08 (0.79- 21.16) | 0.094 | 5.40 (1.00-29.27) | 0.050 |
| Other | 11.06 (247) | 1.70 (1.28-2.26) | ˂0.001*** | 1.83 (1.35-2.49) | ˂0.001*** |
| Type of anal sexual intercourse | |||||
| Versatile sex | 35.29 (788) | REF | REF | ||
| Receptive sex | 22.03 (492) | 1.19 (0.94-1.51) | 0.141 | 1.11 (0.86-1.44) | 0.403 |
| Insertive sex | 42.68 (953) | 1.37 (1.12-1.66) | 0.002** | 1.26 (1.02-1.56) | 0.029* |
| Number of receptive partners | |||||
| One | 73.00 (1,630) | REF | |||
| Two or more | 27.00 (603) | 0 .85 (0.70-1.03) | 0.102 | ||
| Number of insertive partners | |||||
| One | 62.52 (1,396) | REF | |||
| Two or more | 37.48 (837) | 1.02 (0.86-1.22) | 0.786 | ||
| Bought sex from a male in the past six months | |||||
| Yes | 19.03 (425) | REF | REF | ||
| No | 80.97 (1,808) | 1.54 (1.22-1.93) | ˂0.001*** | 1.32 (1.03-1.70) | 0.027* |
| Sold sex to a male in the past six months | |||||
| Yes | 31.30 (699) | REF | |||
| No | 68.70 (1,534) | 1.01 (0.84-1.21) | 0.934 | ||
| Alcohol intake | |||||
| Abstainers | 71.56 (1,598) | REF | REF | ||
| Light drinkers | 21.72 (485) | 0 .50 (0.40-0.63) | ˂0.001*** | 0.54 (0.42-0.68) | ˂0.001*** |
| Moderate drinkers | 4.70 (105) | 0.43 (0.27-0.68) | ˂0.001*** | 0.48 (0.30-0.78) | 0.003** |
| Heavy drinkers | 2.02 (45) | 0.62 (0.33-1.17) | 0.141 | 0.69 (0.35-1.35) | 0.278 |
| Good knowledge of HIV | |||||
| No | 32.69 (730) | REF | REF | ||
| Yes | 67.31 (1,503) | 1.80 (1.49-2.18) | ˂0.001*** | 1.79 (1.46-2.20) | ˂0.001*** |
| Syphilis status | |||||
| Positive | 0.99 (22) | REF | |||
| Negative | 99.01 (2,211) | 0.50 (0.22-1.17) | 0.109 | ||
| Hepatitis b (HBsAg) status | |||||
| Positive | 7.57 (169) | REF | |||
| Negative | 92.43 (2,064) | 0.82 (0.60-1.13) | 0.235 | ||
| Knowing one’s HIV status | |||||
| Yes | 17.64 (394) | REF | |||
| No | 82.36 (1,839) | 1.00 (0.80-1.25) | 0.976 | ||
| Condom accessibility | |||||
| Very easy | 84.24 (1,881) | REF | REF | ||
| Easy | 12.09 (270) | 0.53 (0.39-0.70) | ˂0.001*** | 0.52 (0.37-0.72) | ˂0.001*** |
| Somewhat easy | 3.67 (82) | 0.23 (0.12-0.43) | ˂0.001*** | 0.27 (0.14-0.54) | ˂0.001*** |
| Affordability of condoms | |||||
| Very affordable | 81.42 (1,181) | REF | REF | ||
| Somewhat affordable | 13.12 (293) | 0.75 (0.58-0.98) | 0.033* | 1.19 (0.87-1.63) | 0.265 |
| Expensive | 5.46 (122) | 0.76 (0.52-1.13) | 0.177 | 1.20 (0.78-1.84) | 0.416 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
