Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Consistency of Condom Use with Lubricants and Associated Factors Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Ghana: Evidence from Integrated Bio-Behavioral Surveillance Survey

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

13 January 2025

Posted:

14 January 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract

Several studies conducted worldwide have reported on the effectiveness of consistent condom use with lubricants in preventing HIV transmission and acquisition; however, Men who have sex with men (MSM) in Ghana continue to be disproportionately affected by the HIV burden. They are stigmatized, discriminated against, and criminalized, leading to social isolation, reduced access to health care, and inadequate targeted interventions. Educational campaigns on HIV prevention, dissemination of HIV prevention tools such as condoms and lubricants, and scientific research are also mainly focused on the general population, and this approach overlooks the specific needs and vulnerabilities of MSM. Currently, there is no published record on the prevalence and associated factors of consistent condom use with lubricants among the MSM population in Ghana. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and associated factors of consistent condom use with lubricants among MSM in Ghana. We analyzed cross-sectional data from the Ghana Men's Study II dataset involving 4,095 MSM aged 18 years and above. De-identified data was imported into STATA (College Station, TX, USA, software version 17) for data cleaning and processing. Before the analysis, the data was treated for missing information and outliers. Descriptive analysis was performed to describe relevant characteristics of the study population, such as socio-demographic/socio-economic variables, behavioral practices, and condom use behavior. Bivariate analysis was conducted to determine the relationship between consistent condom use with lubricants and the study variables. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was then performed for significant variables in bivariate analysis to determine the associated factors of consistent condom use with lubricants. All the statistical analyses were performed at a 95% confidence interval, with significant differences at p<0.05. The prevalence of consistent condom use with lubricants during penetrative anal sex was highest with male partners (44.9%), followed by female partners (40.0%), and all sexual partners 38.9% respectively. More than half of MSM (55.1%) used lubricants consistently during anal sex. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, having a senior high school education (AOR: 1.76; 95% CI: 0.88-3.12, p=0.039), tertiary education or higher (AOR: 2.24; 95% CI: 0.86-3.23, p=0.041), Being an insertive sex partner (AOR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.02-1.56, p= 0.029), being a sex worker (AOR: 3.42; 95% CI: 1.38-8.46, p=0.008), bought sex from other males (AOR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.03-1.70, p=0.027), being a light drinker (AOR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.42-0.68, p˂0.001), moderate drinkers (AOR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.30-0.78, p=0.003), and good HIV knowledge (AOR: 1.79; 95% CI: 1.46-2.20, p˂0.001) had higher odds of consistent condom use with lubricants. Being Islamic (AOR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0 .45-0.71, p˂0.001), low income (AOR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.49-0.78, p˂0.001), and easy access (AOR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.37-0.72, p˂0.001) to condoms were positively associated with consistent condom use. This study found a low prevalence of consistent condom use with lubricants among the MSM population in Ghana. The study also found a range of socio-demographic, behavioral, and structural factors associated with consistent condom use with lubricants. This calls for very specific and unique public health interventions, such as developing a predictive model to identify and mitigate barriers to consistent condom use with lubricants.

Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Recent advancements in the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) prevention and treatment cascade, such as pre-and post-exposure prophylaxis, have given much hope that the control of HIV as an epidemic in low and middle-income countries is feasible [1,2,3,4,5,6]. The incidence of new HIV infections in most developing countries has seen a significant decline [7]. Accessing HIV care and treatment services has also improved drastically [8,9]. These successes even apply to the least economically developed countries in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) [2]. However, the HIV epidemiology among specific key population (KP) groups has taken a different dimension in recent times worldwide [10]. Recent evidence indicates that only a little progress has been made in terms of reducing the incidence and prevalence of HIV among men who have sex with men (MSM) from both developing and developed nations [11].
Men who have sex with men, particularly those from underdeveloped countries in SSA, have a greater risk of acquiring and transmitting HIV due to stigmatization, discrimination, and criminalization [12,13]. Biologically, the risk of transmitting HIV during unprotected anal sex is about eighteen times higher than in unprotected vaginal sexual intercourse [14,15,16,17,18]. This is further exacerbated by inadequate access to some of the basic HIV prevention materials and care services, such as condoms and lubricants [11,19]. Men who have sex with men often face challenges in accessing these HIV prevention and care services due to the fear of criminalization, discrimination, and denial of services as a result of their sexual orientation [20,21,22]. Studies conducted globally and in some SSA countries have shown that the challenges mentioned above, among others, can negatively impact MSM access to and use of HIV prevention tools such as condoms and lubricants [21,22,23].
Ghana, like many other SSA countries, has a higher HIV prevalence among MSM (18.1%) compared to the general population (1.68%) [24]. In addition to criminalizing same-sex behaviors and creating a socially unfavorable environment, data regularly show that healthcare providers are also unaware of the unique health needs of MSM in Ghana, resulting in a higher HIV prevalence [25]. The use of condoms with condom-compatible lubricants (CCLs) correctly and consistently has proven to be an effective interventional strategy in reducing HIV transmission and acquisition [26,27,28,29]. However, data on the scope of consistent condom use with lubricants among MSM in Ghana is lacking. Again, several factors associated with consistent condom use among MSM have been reported in different parts of the world [30,31,32,33,34,35]. In a study conducted in India, being exposed to HIV prevention interventions was positively associated with consistent condom use with CCLs [36]. Studies done by Ajayi et al. (2019) and Russell et al. (2019) have also documented that discussing HIV/STIs with a sex partner, being aware of the partner’s HIV status, and having had a tertiary or higher education are significant predictors of consistent condom use with CCLs [37,38]. In a systematic review conducted in SSA by Abdulai and colleagues, older age, higher educational level, easy access to condoms and lubricants, risk-reduction counseling, high self-worth, and having the proper knowledge of condoms and lubricants use were reported as significant factors of consistent condom use with CCLs [39]. However, no study has yet been published on the related factors of consistent condom use with lubricants among the MSM population in Ghana. In this regard, we conducted a retrospective data analysis using integrated bio-behavioral surveillance (IBBS) data from the Ghana Men’s Study II to determine the prevalence of consistent condom use with lubricants and associated factors among the MSM population in Ghana. Findings from this study will serve as evidence for the development of a predictive model to improve the correct and consistent use of condoms with lubricants among MSM and other key population groups in Ghana [40].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Study Setting

This study employed a retrospective analysis of the Ghana Men’s Study II data conducted by the Ghana AIDS Commission (GAC) in 2017. The study was conducted across the then ten (10) regions of the Republic of Ghana to generate comprehensive nationwide data on MSM that can be utilized to address the critical needs of MSM in the Ghanaian population. Ghana is bordered to the north by Burkina Faso, to the east by Togo, to the west by Ivory Coast, and to the south by the Gulf of Guinea. Currently, Ghana has 16 administrative regions, with the Greater Accra Region being the administrative capital. Ghana is one of the most famous countries in West Africa. It is known for its natural resources and agriculture, which account for about one-quarter of its gross domestic product.

2.2. Study Population

The data for this retrospective analysis involved MSM who participated in the Ghana Men’s Study II. Ghana’s MSM population is about 55,000, with an HIV prevalence of 18.1% as compared to 1.68% among the general populace [41,42]. The Ghana Men Study II included men who were biologically male, aged ≥18, had self-reported consensual sexual intercourse with another male in the past year, and had resided, worked, or socialized in one of the regions where the study was conducted [24]. Transgender women were also considered for the study if they were biologically male and had sex with another male within the last year [24].

2.3. Sample Size and Data Collection Process

The Ghana men’s study II data was used. The data was collected through IBBSS using a respondent-driven sampling (RDS) technique. Respondent-driven sampling is a popular form of the snowball sampling approach where respondents are drawn from a social network of existing participants in the sample rather than a sampling frame [43]. The Ghana Men's Study II enrolled a total of 4,095 MSM. A sample size of 500 MSM for each region was determined using factors such as projected recruitment time frame, resources, the highly risk nature of such studies, and, most significantly, the ability to measure the most important key indicators using Ghana Men's Study I estimates with 80% power at a 95% confidence level [24]. The study sample size was also set based on the surveillance objective of tracking significant shifts in the HIV epidemic over time, that is, between rounds of IBBSS. The study treated each location as an independent survey, with the sample size necessary to track any changes at each location [24]. The GAC collected this data through the MSM Comprehensive HIV Prevention Program. The survey questionnaires were administered via a computer, with participants having the alternative to complete them using computer-assisted personal interview software [24]. The data collection process was managed and coordinated by the Bryant Research System to ensure anonymity, privacy, and confidentiality. The data was then captured in the GAC's electronic database and stored on a secured server with encryption and user access control. Please refer to earlier publications for more detailed information on the sample and data collection process [24].
This retrospective data analysis focuses primarily on reported consistent condom usage with lubricants among MSM with all sexual partners (males and females) and the associated factors of consistent condom use with lubricants among the MSM population in Ghana.
Table 1. Description of study variables.
Table 1. Description of study variables.
Research measures Indicator
Outcome variable
Self-reported consistent condom use with lubricants A likert type scale was used with five response categories, namely: Always, Most of the time, Sometimes, Rarely, and Never.

Men who have sex with men who reported "always using condoms with lubricants" during sexual intercourse with all male and female partners were considered synonymous with consistent condom use with lubricants.

Since a single act of condomless sex might expose one to HIV and other sexually transmitted infections, MSM who reported using condoms with lubricants "most of the time," "sometimes," and "rarely" were also classified as inconsistent users. Those who reported "never" to condom use were dropped and excluded from the analysis since our focus is condom users (consistent and inconsistent users).

For this analysis, condom use with lubricant variables was recategorized into two; “yes” (consistent users) and “no” (inconsistent users).
Exposure variables
Types of sexual partners Types of sexual partners, e.g., regular/main partner (the participant's devoted partner, such as spouse, lover, or boyfriend); Paying partner (person who made payment to the participant in either cash, goods, or services in exchange for sex); selling partner (person who receives payment in the form of money, goods, or services in exchange for sex); casual partner (an unfamiliar individual, a friend, or acquaintance with whom the participant had sex but is not considered a regular or paying partner); all sexual partners (male and female sexual partners)
Socio-demographic factors
  • Age
  • Educational level attained (less than primary, primary school, junior high school, secondary, and tertiary/higher)
  • Marital status (single/never married, married/living with a woman, and Widowed/Divorced/Separated)
  • Religion (Christianity, Islam, traditional, other religion, and no religion)
Socio-economic factors
  • Employment status (unemployed, employed in the informal sector, formal sector, and sex worker)
  • Income status/month (no reliable source of income, low income, middle income, and high income)
Behavioral factors
  • Sexual identity/orientation (gay, bisexual, transgender, and other)
  • Sex type (insertive anal sex, receptive anal sex, and versatile)
  • Transactional sex (bought sex from a male in the past six months, bought sex from a female in the past six months, sold sex to a male in the past six months, sold sex to a male in the past six months, and alcohol intake)
  • Alcohol intake (abstainers, light drinkers, moderate drinkers, and heavy drinkers)
  • Good HIV knowledge (yes or no)
Clinical factors
  • Syphilis status (positive or negative)
  • HIV test results (positive or negative)
  • Hepatitis B status (positive or negative)
  • Knowing one's HIV status (yes or no)
Structural factors
  • HIV counseling (yes or no)
  • Condom accessibility (very easy, easy, and somewhat easy)
  • Condom affordability (very affordable, somewhat affordable, and expensive)

2.4. Data Analyses

De-identified data was imported into STATA software version 17 (College Station, TX, USA) for data cleaning and processing. Before the statistical analysis, the data was treated for missing information and outliers. ‘Missing/declined to answer/do not know’ cases were excluded from the analysis. Descriptive statistics were performed using univariate analysis to describe relevant characteristics of the study population, such as socio-demographic/socio-economic characteristics, behavioral practices, and condom use behavior. Bivariate analysis was also conducted to determine the relationship between consistent condom use with lubricants among the MSM population and socio-demographic/socio-economic factors and other context-specific factors such as behavioral, clinical, and structural factors. A final multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the associations of consistent condom use with lubricants. All variables with P<0.05 in the bivariate analysis were used as inputs in a forward stepwise multivariable logistic regression model that was constructed after controlling for confounding variables. The results were presented as adjusted odd ratios (AOR) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) and p-values. Each independent variable was categorized as seen above for the logistic regression analyses. All the statistical analyses were performed at a 95% confidence interval, with significant differences at α<0.05; * denotes a p˂0.05, ** denotes p˂0.01, *** denotes p˂0.001.

2.5. Ethical Considerations

Formal authorization to access and use the Ghana Men’s Study II data for this study was granted by the Ghana AIDS Commission in writing (Appendix A). This paper forms part of a doctoral study by the first author (Ratif Abdulai, RA) and has received ethics clearance (REC-2742-2024) (Appendix B) from the Research and Ethics Committee of the University of Johannesburg. Additionally, this study also falls under a broader research project at the South African Medical Research Council/University of Johannesburg (SAMRC/UJ) Pan African Centre for Epidemic Research (PACER) Extramural Unit funded project, namely “Harnessing Big Heterogeneous Data to Evaluate the Potential Impact of HIV Responses Among Key Populations in Generalized Epidemic Settings in Sub-Saharan Africa” (REC-1504-2023).

3. Results

3.1. Socio-demographic and Socio-economic Characteristics

Table 2 shows the socio-demographic and socio-economic characteristics of 4,095 MSM that participated in the Ghana Men’s Study II. Most MSM were between 18 and 24 years old (2,507/3,939; 63.65%), of which 37.85% (949/2,507) reported consistent condom use with lubricants. Those above 35 years were the least (188/3,939; 4.77%), with 35.64% (67/188) reported prevalence of consistent condom use with lubricants. More than half of MSM had at least a secondary level of education (2,128/4,019; 52.95%). Almost two-fifths of those who had attained a secondary level of education reported using condoms consistently with lubricants (847/2,128; 39.80%). A greater number of MSM were single and never married (3,810/4,047; 94.15%), of which only 38.95% reported consistent condom use with lubricants (1,484/3,810). For those unemployed (1,682/3,987; 42.19%), 41.62% (700/1,682) reported using condoms consistently with lubricants. Less than one percent reported as being sex workers (28/3,987; 0.70%). The majority of MSM were Christians (2,812/4,035; 69.69%), with a 40.61% prevalence of consistent condom use with lubricants (1,142/2,812). Few of them were traditionalists (94/4,035; 2.33%). Among the traditionalists, 30.85% (29/94) used condoms consistently with lubricants. Over one-third of MSM had no reliable source of income (1,430/3,860; 36.99%), while only less than a tenth had an income above Ghc 1,000 per/month (309/3,866; 7.99%).

3.2. Sexual Orientation and Behavioral Practices Among Men who have Sex with Men

Sexual behavior and sexual identity/orientation differ among the MSM population. Out of the total number of 3,814 MSM who disclosed their sexual orientation, 43.13% (1,645/3,814) were gay, 45.67% (1,742/3,814) were bisexual, and transgender people were the least (29/3,814; 0.7%). About one-tenth (10.44%) of them also had other types of sexual orientation. The prevalence of consistent condom use with lubricants among gays, bisexuals, transgender, and other types is 38.84%, 37.54%, 31.03%, and 52.25%, respectively. For sex type, less than half (1,554/3,499; 44.41%) of MSM engaged in insertive sex, with a 42.54% (661/1,554) prevalence of consistent condom use with lubricants, while about a third (1,080/3,499; 30.87%) of them engaged in versatile sex. Among MSM who engaged in versatile sex, 33.1% (357/1,080) used condoms consistently with lubricants. Less than one-fifth (680/3,900; 17.44%) and a quarter (250/992; 25.2%) of those who engaged in transactional sexual intercourse gave money in exchange for sex from males and females in the past six months, respectively. The prevalence of consistency of condom use with lubricants among MSM who engaged in transactional sex with other males and females in the past six months is 33.53% (228/668) and 31.20% (78/250), respectively. The majority of MSM abstained from alcohol, while 2% were heavy drinkers. Among those who abstained from alcohol (2,996/4,015; 74.6%), 42.2% (1,265/2,996) of them reported using condoms consistently with lubricants (Table 3).

3.3. Condom Use at Last Sex among Ghanaian Men who have Sex with Men

Condom use at the last sex, with all sexual partners, is presented in Table 4 below. Of the 3,411 MSM who reported having a main/regular male partner, about two-thirds (67%) of them reported using condoms at the last sexual intercourse. For those who reported having casual male partners, condom use at the last sex was 66.6%. Among MSM who engaged in transactional sex activities, 67% used condoms when sex was sold to a male in exchange for money and bought sex from a male (63%). Out of the 1,195 MSM who reported having main female partners, less than half (46.6%) reported using condoms at the last sexual intercourse with them, 54.5% among casual female partners, and condom use at last sold sex to a female in exchange for money (56.6%). Less than two-thirds of MSM (61.9%) also reported using condoms at the last sex with both males and females.

3.4. Consistent Condom with Lubricant Use Among Men who have Sex with Men

The primary outcome, “always used a condom with lubricant,” was considered a synonym for consistent condom use with lubricant during sexual intercourse. Consistent condom use with both men and women was reported by 38.9% (n = 1,559/4008) of MSM, even though 44.9 % (n = 1,795/3996) reported always using condoms with male sex partners during penetrative anal sex (insertive and receptive) only 40.0% (n = 1,104/2,767) reported always using condoms with female sex partners during penetrative anal sex. More than half (55.1%, 2,207/4008) of MSM reported using lubricants during anal sexual intercourse (Table 5).

3.5. Associated Factors of Consistent Condom Use with Lubricants Among Men who have Sex with Men in Ghana

In both bivariate and multivariable regression, having had a Senior High School education (AOR: 1.76; 95% CI: 0.88-3.12, p=0.039) and tertiary education (AOR: 2.24; 95% CI: 0.86-3.23, p=0.041) were found to be positively associated with consistent condom use with lubricants. Being Islamic (AOR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.49-0.87, p=0.004) was positively associated with using condoms with lubricants consistently. Having a low monthly income status (Ghc 1-599/month) (AOR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.42-0.77, p˂0.001) and being a sex worker (AOR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.00-1.98, p= 0.048) were the socio-economic factors positively associated with the consistency of condom use with lubricants (See Table 6).
With regards to sexual identity/orientation, having “other type” of sexual identity other than bisexual or transgender was positively associated with consistent use of condoms with lubricants (AOR: 1.83; 95% CI: 1.35-2.49, p˂0.001). Being an insertive sex partner (AOR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.02-1.56, p= 0.029) and having bought sex from other males in the past six months (AOR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.03-1.70, p=0.027) had higher odds for consistent condom use with lubricants. Similarly, light drinkers (AOR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.42-0.68, p˂0.001) and moderate drinkers (AOR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.30-0.78, p=0.003) of alcohol were also more likely to use condoms consistently with lubricants in both bivariate and multivariable regression analyses. Again, having a good knowledge of HIV (AOR: 1.79; 95% CI: 1.46-2.20, p˂0.001), as defined by being able to answer the following questions correctly (Is there a cure for HIV?, taking antiretrovirals correctly can improve the lives of people living with HIV, a person can get HIV from witchcraft or other supernatural means, a person can get HIV by receiving an injection with a needle already used by HIV positive person, a person can get HIV by sharing a meal or utensils with someone living with HIV, a person can get HIV through mosquito bites, a health looking person can be HIV positive, people can use condoms consistently to reduce their chances of getting HIV, and people can reduce their chances of getting HIV by having just one sexual partner) was also found to be positively associated with consistent use of condoms with lubricants in both bivariate and multivariable regression analyses (See Table 6).
Regarding condom accessibility, easy access (AOR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.37-0.72, p˂0.001) and somewhat easy access (AOR: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.14-0.54, p˂0.001) to condoms were also positively associated with using condoms with lubricants consistently in bivariate and multivariable regression. Somewhat easy access was also statistically significantly associated with consistent condom use with lubricants in MSM (See Table 6).
Abstainer means do not take alcohol; light drinker means 1-3 drinks/week; moderate drinker means 4-5 drinks/week; and heavy drinker means 6-12 drinks/week. * Means p˂0.05, ** means p˂0.01, *** means p˂0.001, REF means Reference category, ‘n’ is frequency, and CI means Confidence interval.

4. Discussion

4.1. Overview

Several studies conducted across the globe have reported on the effectiveness of consistent condom use with lubricants in preventing new HIV transmission and acquisition among MSM [26,27,28,29]. Ghana, like many other countries in SSA, has its MSM population being disproportionately affected by the HIV burden compared to the general population. Stigmatization, discrimination, criminalization, and social isolation make it challenging for most MSM to have access to some of the essential HIV prevention tools, such as condoms and lubricants. Education and dissemination of HIV prevention tools and the health sector response are also tailored mainly towards the general population. Currently, there is no published record on the prevalence of consistent condom use with lubricants among MSM in Ghana. Several factors associated with consistent condom use with lubricants among MSM have also been reported in different parts of the world [30,31,32,33,34,35]; however, this information is also lacking among the MSM population in Ghana. Given the relevance of consistent condom use with lubricants in preventing new HIV transmission and acquisition, this study aimed to determine the prevalence of consistent condom use with lubricants and the associated factors among the MSM population in Ghana.

4.2. Main Findings

This study found that less than two-fifths (38.9%) of the MSM participants used condoms with lubricants consistently with all sexual partners. Less than half (44.9%) of the MSM reported consistent condom use with lubricants during penetrative anal sex with other males in the previous six months. Two-fifths (40%) of the MSM participants also reported consistent condom use with lubricants during penetrative anal sex with female partners. Having attained secondary and tertiary education and being Islamic were the socio-demographic factors associated with increased odds for consistent condom use with lubricants with all sexual partners. Consistent condom use with lubricants was also positively associated with being a sex worker and having an income status of 599 cedis/month. Behavioral factors associated with using condoms consistently with lubricants were reported by MSM participants who identified themselves as insertive sex partners and those who bought sex from other males in the previous six months. Light and moderate alcohol drinkers also reported using condoms consistently with lubricants. Similarly, having a good knowledge of HIV also had higher odds of consistent condom use with lubricants. Very easy or easy accessibility to condoms was the only structural factor associated with consistent condom use with lubricants among the MSM participants.
The prevalence of consistent condom use with lubricants (38.9%) reported in this study for MSM with all sexual partners (males and females) is higher than in a survey conducted in Nigeria, which reported just about one-tenth (11%) of MSM using condoms with lubricants consistently with both male and female sexual partners [44]. The result of our study for consistent condom use with lubricants (44.9%) with only male partners during penetrative anal sex corroborates the findings of studies conducted by Zhang and colleagues in three different regions of the Northern part of China and D’anna et al. (2015) [45,46]. These studies reported a 41.1% and 45.2% prevalence of consistent condom use with male partners during anal sex [45,46]. However, the prevalence in our study is lower than those conducted in other parts of China [47,48], which reported a 52% and 56% prevalence of consistent condom use with male partners. Other studies done in India and Nigeria also reported a high prevalence of consistent condom use (50 % and 53%) during anal sex with males partners than that found in our study [31,44]. A plausible reason for the difference seen in our study compared to those mentioned above may be because, in Ghana, HIV prevention campaigns and distribution of HIV prevention tools are done exclusively in the general population, thus making accessibility a challenge for most MSM. It may also be accounted for by the fact that Ghana has punitive measures coupled with stigma and discrimination against homosexual activities, which may have discouraged most MSM from accessing HIV prevention tools in the general population, leading to a low prevalence of consistent condom use with lubricants. The result for consistent condom use with lubricants (40%) during anal sex with female partners is similar to studies conducted in Nigeria by Strömdahl and colleagues and another study done in the United States, which reported that 43% and 23.2% of MSM used condoms consistently during anal sex with their female partners respectively [44,46]. Other studies conducted in Japan, Korea, and China also align with our findings [49,50,51].
This study has revealed that having secondary and tertiary levels of education was positively associated with the consistency of condom use with lubricants among the MSM population. This finding is in line with studies conducted by Wang et al. (2021) and Olawore et al. (2021) [47,52]. Men who have sex with men who have at least a senior high school education may have been more aware of the dangers involved in unprotected anal sexual activities and have access to adequate educational resources, which increased their level of self-worth and awareness. Education might have also sharpened their condom-use negotiation skills with their sexual partners, leading to consistent condom use with lubricants.
Our study also found that Islamic or Muslims were more likely to use condoms with lubricants consistently; however, this does not agree with a study conducted in Ghana among the general populace by Ahinkorah and colleagues in 2020 [53]. The reason for this difference might be that our study focused on the MSM population, whose chance of contracting HIV during unprotected anal sexual intercourse is almost twenty times higher than during unprotected vaginal sex [54,55]. Such a greater risk may have encouraged them to use condoms with lubricants more consistently. The second reason may be attributed to the fact that most Muslim men often have more than one wife and up to four wives in some cases, which implies that having condomless anal sex with other men not only increases their chances of contracting HIV and STIs but their wives as well. This may also have been enough reason for them to use condoms with lubricants more consistently during anal sex with their male counterparts.
For the socio-economic factors, this study found a positive association between consistent condom use with lubricants and MSM who had an income status of 599 cedis/month. This is in consonance with studies conducted in Ghana and Brazil [53,56,57]. Individuals with a moderate income status are also exposed to several HIV prevention campaigns via different avenues (such as newspapers, magazines, and documentaries), which may have helped them to develop strong condom use negotiation skills and decline sex when a condom is not used [58]. Other studies have reported that affluent individuals are more exposed to diverse media opportunities and educational resources. Such people discuss HIV and STI-related risks more frequently and have a better understanding of the dangers associated with condomless anal sex, have fewer misconceptions, and therefore show more positive attitudes toward condom use [59,60]. Having a moderate income status also elevates people in society, thus increasing their self-worth, and therefore, they choose not to engage in risky sexual behaviors that would jeopardize their health.
Light and moderate drinkers of alcohol were among the behavioral factors positively associated with the consistency of condom use with lubricants among the MSM population in Ghana. This contravenes studies conducted in Japan, China, and the United States [51,61,62,63]. Similar studies done by Cai & Lau et al. (2014) and Barrán-Limán et al. (2012) do not also agree with our findings [64,65]; however, it must be stated without any ambiguity that the above studies reported on sex under the influence of alcohol and not just alcohol intake. Sex under the influence of alcohol may have impaired their judgment of safe sexual practices and badly influenced their decision-making, leading to inconsistent condom use [66,67,68], which is not the case in our study. Another reason might be that both light and moderate drinkers of alcohol do not take much alcohol at a time, leaving their judgment of safe sex practices intact or may not take in alcohol before sexual intercourse. The study also revealed a positive association between consistent condom use with lubricants and sex workers, as well as MSM who buy sex from other males. This is supported by studies conducted in the Savannakhet province of the Lao People’s Democratic Republic and Nigeria [69,70]. The study also revealed that insertive anal sex partners used condoms with lubricants consistently. This agrees with the findings of a systematic review conducted by Abdulai et al. (2024) [71]. Among the reasons for the consistent condom use with lubricants may not be limited to reducing anal penetration discomfort and reducing the risk of acquiring or transmitting HIV due to skin tear [72,73].
Consistency of condom use with lubricants was also associated with having a good knowledge of HIV, and this agrees with studies conducted in Cambodia and South Korea [3,49]. Other studies done by Mansergh et al. (2006) and Ruan et al. (2008) have also reported a positive association between HIV knowledge and consistent condom use with lubricants [74,75]. Chandra and colleagues also reported in their studies that low HIV knowledge was associated with inconsistent condom use [76]. Men who have sex with men who have good knowledge of HIV are more likely to be well-informed about the dangers associated with condomless anal sexual intercourse, thus making them have a more positive attitude towards consistent condom use with lubricants.
Very easy and easy access to condoms were the structural factors associated with the consistency of condom use with lubricants among the Ghanaian MSM population. This is consistent with studies done by Piot et al. (2010), Ramanathan et al. (2013), and Verma et al. (2010) [36,77,78]. Having easy access may have motivated them to use condoms with lubricants consistently to prevent themselves from being infected with HIV or transmitting it to their sexual partners.

4.3. Strengths and Limitations

The study contributes to knowledge and addresses a significant gap in understanding sexual health practices among the MSM population in Ghana. This is essential for developing targeted interventions and policies to improve the consistency of condom use with lubricants among the MSM population. The strength of this study relies on the nationwide coverage and reliability of the data. This study is not devoid of limitations, considering that it relies on secondary data. The data used for the analysis relied on self-reporting of information and may be related to biases such as recall and social desirability biases. Because the consistency of condom use with lubricants was self-reported, there is the possibility of under or over-reporting by the MSM participants due to recall bias and among societies that have social norms that frown on condom use. Despite the limitations mentioned above, the Ghana Men's Study II used rigorous scientific methods employed during the Ghana Men's Study I to ensure the scientific rigor of the study, comparability, and reliability. The sample size (4,095) was calculated to ensure it was large enough to generalize the findings to the entire MSM population. It was calculated based on Ghana's estimated MSM population size. Multiple recruitment techniques were also used to recruit the MSM participants to ensure that different MSM groups were represented in the study, thus broadly enhancing the applicability of the study's findings to MSM. To further guarantee the reliability and dependability of the study findings, Ghana Men's Study II employed the same validated instruments as Ghana Men's Study I.

4.4. Practical Implications

The study findings have profound implications for public health interventions, considering that in most SSA countries, condom use is primarily controlled by those who give sex as well as individuals' demographic and economic factors such as age, marital status, education level attained, socio-cultural norms, and income status. However, receivers of sex may also insist on condom use to protect themselves from contracting HIV and other STIs. Since consistent condom use with lubricants is associated with having at least a secondary level education and partly linked to individual income status, unique educational interventions such as online education on short courses for MSM are required to boost their knowledge and increase their self-worth and self-awareness. Other interventions should also aim to encourage MSM to participate in capacity-building programs. Additionally, our study calls for developing a predictive model to improve the consistency of condom use with condom-compatible lubricants.

5. Conclusions

This study has revealed that over 50% of MSM are not using condoms consistently with lubricants. The prevalence of consistent condom use with lubricants with all sexual partners (males and females), only male partners, and female partners are 38.9%, 44.9%, and 40%, respectively. Demographic and socioeconomic factors such as educational level attained, employment status, religion, and income status influenced consistent condom use with lubricants. Behavioral factors such as light to moderate alcohol intake and having a good knowledge of HIV were also positively associated with the consistency of condom use with lubricants. Easy accessibility to HIV prevention tools, such as condoms and lubricants, is also a significant predictor of consistent condom use with lubricants. To ensure the consistent utilization of condoms with CCLs, condom and lubricant manufacturing companies should be tasked with the responsibility of producing condom-lubricant pairs to reduce the stress of having to look for condoms and lubricants separately. This condom-lubricant pair is my proposed interventional strategy to encourage individuals to use condoms with lubricants consistently. There should also be a differentiated condom and lubricant distribution strategy that includes MSM-based organizations to ensure an adequate supply of condoms and CCLs to its members.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.A., EP., K.A., and R.N.P.M.; Validation, R.A., R.N.P.M., Y.A.S., and E.P.; Writing the first draft, R.A.; reviewing and editing, R.A., EP., K.A., I.D.K., R.A., Y.A.S., and R.N.P.M.; supervision, R.N.P.M., K.A., and E.P.; project administration, R.A.; funding acquisition, R.A., and R.N.P.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work reported herein is made possible through funding by the South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) project Code #57035 (SAMRC File Reference No: HDID8528/KR/202) through its Division of Research Capacity Development under the Mid-Career Scientist Programme using funding received from the South African National Treasury. The first author, Ratif Abdulai, is also supported by the Global Excellence Stature, Fourth Industrial Revolution (GES 4.0) Scholarship. This work is conducted under the auspices of the SAMRC/UJ PACER Extramural Unit. The content hereof is the authors' sole responsibility and does not represent the official views of the SAMRC or UJ.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Research and Ethics Committee of the University of Johannesburg (REC-2742-2024; date of approval: 10 May 2024 ).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was not applicable because the study utilized secondary data; however, permission was granted by the Ghana AIDS Commission to access and use the Data (Ghana Men’s Study II Data). See Appendix 1 for the approval letter.

Data Availability Statement

Data can only be acquired from the Ghana AIDS Commission at info@ghanaids.gov.gh upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This study is part of the Boloka Project, funded by the South African National Treasury and the SAMRC through the Mid-Career Scientist Program under the Division of Research Capacity Development. The authors, Ratif Abdulai, Edith Phalane, and Refilwe Nancy Phaswana-Mafuya, are supported by the SAMRC. This research paper is part of the first author's (RA) doctoral study, funded by the UJ Global Excellence Stature, Fourth Industrial Revolution (GES 4.0) Scholarship. We sincerely appreciate the support and contributions of the SAMRC/UJ Pan African Centre for Epidemics Research Extramural Unit and the Ghana AIDS Commission. The content hereof is the authors' sole responsibility and does not necessarily represent the official views of the SAMRC or UJ.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

Appendix A is the Gatekeeper Permission Letter for Secondary Data Utilization.

Appendix B

Appendix B is the Research and Ethics Approval Letter.

References

  1. Beyrer C, Sullivan P, Sanchez J, Baral SD, Collins C, Wirtz AL, et al. The increase in global HIV epidemics in MSM. AIDS [Internet]. 2013 Nov 13 [cited 2024 Oct 19];27(17):2665–78. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih. 2384.
  2. Havlir, D.; Beyrer, C. The Beginning of the End of AIDS? New Engl. J. Med. 2012, 367, 685–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yi, S.; Tuot, S.; Chhoun, P.; Pal, K.; Tith, K.; Brody, C. Factors Associated with Inconsistent Condom Use among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Cambodia. PLOS ONE 2015, 10, e0136114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Guure, C.; Afagbedzi, S.; Torpey, K. Willingness to take and ever use of pre-exposure prophylaxis among female sex workers in Ghana. Medicine 2022, 101, e28798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mimiaga MJ, Case P, Johnson C V., Safren SA, Mayer KH. Pre-Exposure Antiretroviral Prophylaxis (PrEP) attitudes in high risk Boston area MSM: Limited knowledge and experience, but potential for increased utilization after education. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr [Internet]. 2009 Jan 1 [cited 2024 Oct 19];50(1):77. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih. 2659.
  6. Eakle R, Venter F, Rees H. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in an era of stalled HIV prevention: Can it change the game? Retrovirology [Internet]. 2018 Apr 2 [cited 2024 Oct 19];15(1):29. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih. 5879.
  7. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). Fact sheet 2024 - Latest global and regional HIV statistics on the status of the AIDS epidemic. 2024; Available from: https://www.unaids.
  8. Idindili, B.M.; King, S.J.; Stolka, K.; Mashasi, I.; Bashosho, P.; Karungula, H.; Chintowa, F.; Mwakabole, G.; Ashburn, K.; Do, B.; et al. HIV care and treatment clinic performance following President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief-funded infrastructure improvement in Tanzania. South. Afr. J. HIV Med. 2018, 19, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Goldstein, D.; Salvatore, M.; Ferris, R.; Phelps, B.R.; Minior, T. Integrating global HIV services with primary health care: a key step in sustainable HIV epidemic control. Lancet Glob. Heal. 2023, 11, e1120–e1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. HIV/AIDS JUNP, on. Global report : UNAIDS report on the global AIDS epidemic 2013. >; 2013.
  11. Beyrer, C.; Baral, S.D.; van Griensven, F.; Goodreau, S.M.; Chariyalertsak, S.; Wirtz, A.L.; Brookmeyer, R. Global epidemiology of HIV infection in men who have sex with men. 380. [CrossRef]
  12. Altman, D.; Aggleton, P.; Williams, M.; Kong, T.; Reddy, V.; Harrad, D.; Reis, T.; Parker, R. Men who have sex with men: stigma and discrimination. Lancet 2012, 380, 439–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Trapence, G.; Collins, C.; Avrett, S.; Carr, R.; Sanchez, H.; Ayala, G.; Diouf, D.; Beyrer, C.; Baral, S.D. From personal survival to public health: community leadership by men who have sex with men in the response to HIV. 380. [CrossRef]
  14. Baggaley, R.F.; White, R.G.; Boily, M.-C. HIV transmission risk through anal intercourse: systematic review, meta-analysis and implications for HIV prevention. Leuk. Res. 2010, 39, 1048–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jin, F.; Jansson, J.; Law, M.; Prestage, G.P.; Zablotska, I.; Imrie, J.C.; Kippax, S.C.; Kaldor, J.M.; E Grulich, A.; Wilson, D.P. Per-contact probability of HIV transmission in homosexual men in Sydney in the era of HAART. AIDS 2010, 24, 907–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Boily, M.-C.; Baggaley, R.F.; Wang, L.; Masse, B.; White, R.G.; Hayes, R.J.; Alary, M. Heterosexual risk of HIV-1 infection per sexual act: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2009, 9, 118–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Baral, S.; Trapence, G.; Motimedi, F.; Umar, E.; Iipinge, S.; Dausab, F.; Beyrer, C. HIV Prevalence, Risks for HIV Infection, and Human Rights among Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) in Malawi, Namibia, and Botswana. PLOS ONE 2009, 4, e4997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mayer KH, Wheeler DP, Bekker LG, Grinsztejn B, Remien RH, Sandfort TGM, et al. Overcoming Biological, Behavioral and Structural Vulnerabilities: New Directions in Research to Decrease HIV Transmission in Men who have Sex with Men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr [Internet]. 2013 Jul 1 [cited 2024 Oct 20];63(0 2):S161. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih. 3740.
  19. Holland, C.E.; Papworth, E.; Billong, S.C.; Kassegne, S.; Petitbon, F.; Mondoleba, V.; Moukam, L.V.; Macauley, I.; Ntsama, S.P.E.; Yomb, Y.R.; et al. Access to HIV Services at Non-Governmental and Community-Based Organizations among Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) in Cameroon: An Integrated Biological and Behavioral Surveillance Analysis. PLOS ONE 2015, 10, e0122881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Beyrer, C. Global Prevention of HIV Infection for Neglected Populations: Men Who Have Sex with Men. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2010, 50, S108–S113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Fay, H.; Baral, S.D.; Trapence, G.; Motimedi, F.; Umar, E.; Iipinge, S.; Dausab, F.; Wirtz, A.; Beyrer, C. Stigma, Health Care Access, and HIV Knowledge Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in Malawi, Namibia, and Botswana. AIDS Behav. 2010, 15, 1088–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Rebe, K.; Semugoma, P.; McIntyre, J.A. New HIV prevention technologies and their relevance to MARPS in African epidemics. SAHARA-J: J. Soc. Asp. HIV/AIDS 2012, 9, 164–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dramé, F.M.; Peitzmeier, S.; Lopes, M.; Ndaw, M.; Sow, A.; Diouf, D.; Baral, S. Gay men and other men who have sex with men in West Africa: evidence from the field. Cult. Heal. Sex. 2013, 15, 7–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ghana AIDS Commission. Ghana Aids Commission Ghana Men ’ S Study II. 2017; Available from: https://www.ghanaids.gov.gh/mcadmin/Uploads/Ghana Men%27s Study Report(2).
  25. Abu-Ba’are, G.R.; Shamrock, O.W.; Apreku, A.; Agbemedu, G.R.K.; Zigah, E.Y.; Ezechi, O.C.; Nelson, L.E.; Torpey, K. Awareness and Willingness to use Condoms and Preexposure Prophylaxis among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Cisgendered Men who Have sex with men in Slum Communities in Ghana. BSGH-004. J. Int. Assoc. Provid. AIDS Care (JIAPAC) 2023, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Condom fact sheet. Usaid [Internet]. 2015;26(April):1–2. Available from: https://2012-2017.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/1864/condom-fact-sheet-January-2015.
  27. Wiyeh, A.B.; Mome, R.K.B.; Mahasha, P.W.; Kongnyuy, E.J.; Wiysonge, C.S. Effectiveness of the female condom in preventing HIV and sexually transmitted infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Heal. 2020, 20, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Giannou, F.K.; Tsiara, C.G.; Nikolopoulos, G.K.; Talias, M.; Benetou, V.; Kantzanou, M.; Bonovas, S.; Hatzakis, A. Condom effectiveness in reducing heterosexual HIV transmission: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on HIV serodiscordant couples. Expert Rev. Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res. 2015, 16, 489–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Vittinghoff E, Douglas J, Judson F, McKirnan D, Macqueen K, Buchbinder SR. Per-contact risk of human immunodeficiency virus transmission between male sexual partners. Am J Epidemiol [Internet]. 1999 Aug 1 [cited 2024 Oct 20];150(3):306–11. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih. 1043.
  30. Cai, Y.; Lau, J.T.F. Multi-dimensional factors associated with unprotected anal intercourse with regular partners among Chinese men who have sex with men in Hong Kong: a respondent-driven sampling survey. BMC Infect. Dis. 2014, 14, 205–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ramanathan, S.; Chakrapani, V.; Ramakrishnan, L.; Goswami, P.; Yadav, D.; Subramanian, T.; George, B.; Paranjape, R. Consistent condom use with regular, paying, and casual male partners and associated factors among men who have sex with men in Tamil Nadu, India: findings from an assessment of a large-scale HIV prevention program. BMC Public Heal. 2013, 13, 827–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, H.; Lu, H.; Pan, S.W.; Xia, D.; Zhao, Y.; Xiao, Y.; He, X.; Yue, H.; Sun, Z.; Xu, Y.; et al. Correlates of Unprotected Anal Intercourse: The Influence of Anal Sex Position Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Beijing, China. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2014, 44, 375–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Li, D.; Li, C.; Wang, Z.; Lau, J.T.F. Prevalence and Associated Factors of Unprotected Anal Intercourse with Regular Male Sex Partners among HIV Negative Men Who Have Sex with Men in China: A Cross-Sectional Survey. PLOS ONE 2015, 10, e0119977–e0119977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Deshpande, S.; Bharat, S. Sexual partner mixing and differentials in consistent condom use among men who have sex with men in Maharashtra, India. Glob. Public Heal. 2014, 10, 103–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lau, J.T.; Cai, W.; Tsui, H.Y.; Chen, L.; Cheng, J.; Lin, C.; Gu, J.; Hao, C. Unprotected anal intercourse behavior and intention among male sex workers in Shenzhen serving cross-boundary male clients coming from Hong Kong, China – prevalence and associated factors. AIDS Care 2011, 24, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ramanathan, S.; Chakrapani, V.; Ramakrishnan, L.; Goswami, P.; Yadav, D.; George, B.; Sen, S.; Rachakulla, H.; Subramanian, T.; Paranjape, R.S. Factors Associated with Use of Latex Condom-Compatible Lubricants by Men Who Have Sex with Men in India: Implications for HIV Prevention. J. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2013, 2013, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ajayi, A.I.; Ismail, K.O.; Akpan, W. Factors associated with consistent condom use: a cross-sectional survey of two Nigerian universities. BMC Public Heal. 2019, 19, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Russell, C.; Tahlil, K.; Davis, M.; Winston, A.; Amaambo, T.; Hamunime, N.; Pietersen, I.; Jordan, M.R.; Tang, A.M.; Hong, S.Y. Barriers to condom use among key populations in Namibia. Int. J. STD AIDS 2019, 30, 1417–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Abdulai, R.; Phalane, E.; Atuahene, K.; Phaswana-Mafuya, R.N. Consistent Condom and Lubricant Use and Associated Factors Amongst Men Who Have Sex with Men in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review. Sexes 2024, 5, 796–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Abdulai, R.; Phalane, E.; Atuahene, K.; Phaswana-Mafuya, R.N. Consistent and Correct Use of Condoms With Lubricants and Associated Factors Among Men Who Have Sex With Men from the Ghana Men’s Study II: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Res. Protoc. 2024, 13, e63276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. United Nations Joint Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). Fact Sheet—Global AIDS Updatate. 2019; United Nations Joint Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS): Geneva, Switzerland, 2019; Available online: https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/UNAIDS_FactSheet_en.pdf (accessed on 20 November 2019).
  42. UNAIDS. Country Progress Report on 90-90-90 -Ghana. Glob AIDS Monit 2019 [Internet]. 2019;1–42. Available from: https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/country/documents/GHA_2019_countryreport.
  43. McCreesh, N.; Tarsh, M.N.; Seeley, J.; Katongole, J.; White, R.G. Community understanding of respondent-driven sampling in a medical research setting in Uganda: importance for the use of RDS for public health research. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 2013, 16, 269–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Strömdahl, S.; Williams, A.O.; Eziefule, B.; Emmanuel, G.; Iwuagwu, S.; Anene, O.; Orazulike, I.; Beyrer, C.; Baral, S. Associations of Consistent Condom Use Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Abuja, Nigeria. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 2012, 28, 1756–1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhang, D.-C.; Wu, Z.-Y.; Scott, S.R. Factors associated with unprotected anal intercourse among male students who have sex with men in three Northern regions of China. Chin. Med J. 2019, 132, 1639–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. D’anna LH, Warner L, Margolis AD, Korosteleva OA, O’donnell L, Rietmeijer CA, et al. Consistency of Condom Use during Receptive Anal Intercourse Among Women and Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM): Findings from the Safe in the City Behavioral Study. Sex Transm Dis [Internet]. 2015 Jul 11 [cited 2024 Nov 8];42(7):393. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih. 8600.
  47. Wang, H.; Yu, S.; Cross, W.; Lam, L.; Banik, B.; Zhang, K. Condom Use Consistency and Associated Factors Among College Student Men Who Have Sex with Men from Seven Colleges in Changsha City: A Cross-Sectional Survey. HIV/AIDS - Res. Palliat. Care, 13. [CrossRef]
  48. Jiang, H.; Chen, X.; Li, J.; Tan, Z.; Cheng, W.; Yang, Y. Predictors of condom use behavior among men who have sex with men in China using a modified information-motivation-behavioral skills (IMB) model. BMC Public Heal. 2019, 19, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sohn A, Cho B. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Sexual Behaviors in HIV/AIDS and Predictors Affecting Condom Use among Men Who Have Sex with Men in South Korea. Osong Public Heal Res Perspect [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2024 Nov 9];3(3):156. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih. 3738.
  50. Chow, E.P.F.; Wilson, D.P.; Zhang, L. Patterns of Condom Use Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AIDS Behav. 2011, 16, 653–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. O Hill, A.; Bavinton, B.R.; Armstrong, G. Prevalence and Factors Associated with Inconsistent Condom Use among Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) Who Use Mobile Geo-Social Networking Applications in Greater Tokyo. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Heal. 2018, 15, 2815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Olawore, O.; Crowell, T.A.; Ketende, S.C.; Ramadhani, H.O.; Liu, H.; Ake, J.A.; Kokogho, A.; Adebajo, S.; Charurat, M.E.; Nowak, R.G.; et al. Individual and partnership characteristics associated with consistent condom use in a cohort of cisgender men who have sex with men and transgender women in Nigeria. BMC Public Heal. 2021, 21, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ahinkorah, B.O.; Budu, E.; Seidu, A.-A.; Hagan, J.E.; Agbaglo, E.; Hormenu, T.; Schack, T.; Yaya, S. Consistent condom use among men who pay for sex in sub-Saharan Africa: Empirical evidence from Demographic and Health Surveys. PLOS ONE 2020, 15, e0236552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Smith, D.K.; Herbst, J.H.; Zhang, X.; Rose, C.E. Condom Effectiveness for HIV Prevention by Consistency of Use Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States. Am. J. Ther. 2015, 68, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. Other STDs and Associated Conditions How to Use a Condom Consistently and Correctly : 2016;1–2.
  56. Adu-Oppong, A.; Grimes, R.M.; Ross, M.W.; Risser, J.; Kessie, G. Social and Behavioral Determinants of Consistent Condom Use Among Female Commercial Sex Workers in Ghana. AIDS Educ. Prev. 2007, 19, 160–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Magalhães R de LB, Sousa LRM, Gir E, Galvão MTG, de Oliveira VMC, Reis RK. Factors associated to inconsistent condom use among sex workers. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2024 Nov 9];27:e3226. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih. 6896.
  58. John Cleland, BF. Sexual Behaviour and AIDS in the Developing World. Sex Behav AIDS Dev World. 2013. [Google Scholar]
  59. Wangmu C, Lamu S, Wangmu D, Wangmu C, Lamu S, Wangmu D. AIDS knowledge and condom use among female sex workers in Tibet Autonomous Region: a cross-sectional survey. Chinese J Public Heal 2021, Vol 37, Issue 8, Pages 1214-1218 [Internet]. 2021 Aug 31 [cited 2024 Nov 9];37(8):1214–8. Available from: https://www.zgggws.com/en/article/doi/10.11847/zgggws1128264.
  60. Kong, T.S.K. Risk factors affecting condom use among male sex workers who serve men in China: a qualitative study. Sex. Transm. Infect. 2008, 84, 444–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Li, D.; Jia, Y.; Ruan, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, Q.; Liang, H.; Zhou, Z.; Luo, F.; Zhang, X.; Jiang, S.; et al. Correlates of Incident Infections for HIV, Syphilis, and Hepatitis B Virus in A Cohort of Men Who Have Sex with Men in Beijing. AIDS Patient Care STDs 2010, 24, 595–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Holloway, I.W. Substance Use Homophily Among Geosocial Networking Application Using Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2015, 44, 1799–1811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Rice E, Holloway I, Winetrobe H, Rhoades H, Barman-Adhikari A, Gibbs J, et al. Sex risk among young men who have sex with men who use Grindr, a smartphone geosocial networking application. J AIDS Clin Res. 2012;3(SPL ISSUE4).
  64. Cai, Y.; Lau, J.T.F. Multi-dimensional factors associated with unprotected anal intercourse with regular partners among Chinese men who have sex with men in Hong Kong: a respondent-driven sampling survey. BMC Infect. Dis. 2014, 14, 205–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Barrón-Limón, S.; Semple, S.J.; A Strathdee, S.; Lozada, R.; Vargas-Ojeda, A.; Patterson, T.L. Correlates of unprotected anal sex among men who have sex with men in Tijuana, Mexico. BMC Public Heal. 2012, 12, 433–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Geoffrion, L. How Alcohol Can Impair Judgement Why Does Alcohol Impair Judgement and Lower Inhibitions ? Poor Decision-Making While Under the Influence of Alcohol. Amerircan Addict Centers [Internet]. 2023;1–9. Available from: https://alcohol.
  67. The MASH Research Team; Scott-Sheldon, L. A.J.; Carey, K.B.; Cunningham, K.; Johnson, B.T.; Carey, M.P. Alcohol Use Predicts Sexual Decision-Making: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Experimental Literature. AIDS Behav. 2015, 20, 19–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Shuper, P.A.; Joharchi, N.; Irving, H.; Rehm, J. Alcohol as a Correlate of Unprotected Sexual Behavior Among People Living with HIV/AIDS: Review and Meta-Analysis. AIDS Behav. 2009, 13, 1021–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Andrews, C.H.; Faxelid, E.; Sychaerun, V.; Phrasisombath, K. Determinants of consistent condom use among female sex workers in Savannakhet, Lao PDR. BMC Women's Heal. 2015, 15, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Eluwa, G.I.; Adebajo, S.B.; Eluwa, T.; Ogbanufe, O.; Ilesanmi, O.; Nzelu, C. Rising HIV prevalence among men who have sex with men in Nigeria: a trend analysis. BMC Public Heal. 2019, 19, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Abdulai, R.; Phalane, E.; Atuahene, K.; Phaswana-Mafuya, R.N. Consistent Condom and Lubricant Use and Associated Factors Amongst Men Who Have Sex with Men in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review. Sexes 2024, 5, 796–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lee, M.; Sandfort, T.; Collier, K.; Lane, T.; Reddy, V. Breakage is the norm: use of condoms and lubrication in anal sex among Black South African men who have sex with men. Cult. Heal. Sex. 2016, 19, 501–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Renzi C, Tabet SR, Stucky JA, Eaton N, Coletti AS, Surawicz CM, et al. Safety and acceptability of the RealityTM condom for anal sex among men who have sex with men. Aids. 2003;17(5):727–31.
  74. Mansergh, G.; Naorat, S.; Jommaroeng, R.; Jenkins, R.A.; Stall, R.; Jeeyapant, S.; Phanuphak, P.; Tappero, J.W.; van Griensven, F. Inconsistent Condom Use with Steady and Casual Partners and Associated Factors among Sexually-Active Men who Have Sex with Men in Bangkok, Thailand. AIDS Behav. 2006, 10, 743–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Ruan, S.; Yang, H.; Zhu, Y.; Ma, Y.; Li, J.; Zhao, J.; McFarland, W.; Raymond, H.F. HIV Prevalence and Correlates of Unprotected Anal Intercourse Among Men Who Have Sex with Men, Jinan, China. AIDS Behav. 2008, 12, 469–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Chandra, Prabha S; Desai, Geetha; Ranjan S. HIV & psychiatric disorders [Internet]. 2005. p. pp 451-467. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih. 1581.
  77. Piot, B.; Mukherjee, A.; Navin, D.; Krishnan, N.; Bhardwaj, A.; Sharma, V.; Marjara, P. Lot quality assurance sampling for monitoring coverage and quality of a targeted condom social marketing programme in traditional and non-traditional outlets in India. Sex. Transm. Infect. 2010, 86, i56–i61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Verma, R.; Shekhar, A.; Khobragade, S.; Adhikary, R.; George, B.; Ramesh, B.M.; Ranebennur, V.; Mondal, S.; Patra, R.K.; Srinivasan, S.; et al. Scale-up and coverage of Avahan: a large-scale HIV-prevention programme among female sex workers and men who have sex with men in four Indian states. Sex. Transm. Infect. 2010, 86, i76–i82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 2. Demographics and Socio-economic Characteristics of the Study Participants.
Table 2. Demographics and Socio-economic Characteristics of the Study Participants.
Variables Consistent condom use with lubricants Total %(n)
Yes n (%) No n (%)
Age category
18-24 949 (37.85) 1,558 (62.15) 2,507 (63.65)
25-34 488 (39.23) 756 (60.77) 1,244 (31.58)
35+ 67 (35.64) 121 (64.36) 188 (4.77)
Total 1,504 (38.18) 2,435 (61.82) 3,939 (100.00)
Educational level attained
Less than primary 49 (28.32) 124 (71.68) 173 (4.30)
Primary school 52 (37.41) 87 (62.59) 139 (3.46)
Junior High school 397 (36.22) 699 (63.78) 1,096 (27.27)
Secondary school 847 (39.80) 1,281 (60.20) 2,128 (52.95)
Tertiary or higher 214 (44.31) 269 (55.69) 483 (12.02)
Total 1,559 (38.79) 2,460 (61.21) 4,019 (100.00)
Marital status
Single/Never Married 1,484 (38.95) 2,326 (61.05) 3,810 (94.15)
Married/living with a woman 59 (32.96) 120 (67.04) 179 (4.42)
Widowed/Divorced/Separated 22 (37.93) 36 (62.07) 58 (1.43)
Total 1,565 (38.67) 2,482 (61.33) 4,047 (100.00)
Employment
Unemployed 700 (41.62) 982 (58.38) 1,682 (42.19)
Informal 349 (39.57) 533 (60.43) 882 (22.12)
Formal 288 (34.45) 548 (65.55) 836 (20.97)
Sex worker 14 (50.0) 14 (50.0) 28 (0.70)
Other 202 (36.14) 357 (63.86) 559 (14.02)
Total 1,553 (38.95) 2,434 (61.05) 3,987 (100.00)
Religion
Christianity 1,142 (40.61) 1,670 (59.39) 2,812 (69.69)
Islamic 139 (26.99) 376 (73.01) 515 (12.76)
Traditional 29 (30.85) 65 (69.15) 94 (2.33)
Other 205 (43.80) 263 (56.20) 468 (11.60)
No religion 49 (33.56) 97 (66.44) 146 (3.62)
Total 1,564 (38.76) 2,471 (61.24) 4,035 (100.00)
Income status (GHS)
No Income 643 (44.97) 787 (55.03) 1,430 (36.99)
Low Income (1-599 cedis/month) 660 (35.95) 1,176 (64.05) 1,836 (47.49)
Middle Income (600-999 cedis/month) 106 (36.43) 185 (63.57) 291 (7.53)
High come (≥1000 cedis/month) 115 (37.22) 194 (62.78) 309 (7.99)
Total 1,524 (39.42) 2,342 (60.58) 3,866 (100.00)
Table 3. Sexual orientation and behavioral practices among men who have sex with men.
Table 3. Sexual orientation and behavioral practices among men who have sex with men.
Variables Consistent condom use with lubricants Total %(n)
Yes n (%) No n (%)
Sexual identity/orientation
Gay 639 (38.84) 1,006 (61.16) 1,645 (43.13)
Bisexual 654 (37.54) 1,088 (62.46) 1,742 (45.67)
Transgender 9 (31.03) 20 (68.97) 29 (0.76)
Other 200 (50.25) 198 (49.75) 398 (10.44)
Total 1,502 (39.38) 2,312 (60.62) 3,814 (100.00)
Type of anal sexual intercourse
Insertive anal sex 661 (42.54) 893 (57.46) 1,554 (44.41)
Receptive anal sex 350 (40.46) 515 (59.54) 865 (24.72)
Versatile sex 357 (33.06) 723 (66.94) 1,080 (30.87)
Total 1,368 (39.10) 2,131 (60.90) 3,499 (100.00)
Bought sex from a male in the past six months
Yes 228 (33.53) 452 (66.47) 680 (17.44)
No 1,283 (39.84) 1,937 (60.16) 3,220 (82.56)
Total 1,511 (38.74) 2,389 (61.26) 3,900 (100.00)
Bought sex from a female in the past six months
Yes 78 (31.20) 172 (68.80) 250 (25.20)
No 228 (30.73) 514 (69.27) 742 (74.80)
Total 306 (30.85) 686 (69.15) 992 (100.00)
Sold sex to a male in the past six months
Yes 433 (37.49) 722 (62.51) 1,155 (29.86)
No 1,059 (39.03) 1,654 (60.97) 2,713 (70.14)
Total 1,492 (38.57) 2,376 (61.43) 3,868 (100.00)
Sold sex to a female in the past six months
Yes 42 (28.57) 105 (71.43) 147 (15.03)
No 257 (30.93) 574 (69.07) 831 (84.97)
Total 299 (30.57) 679 (69.43) 978 (10.00)
Alcohol intake
Abstainers 1,265 (42.22) 1,731 (57.78) 2,996 (74.62)
Light drinker 229 (28.99) 561 (71.01) 790 (19.68)
Moderate drinker 36 (24.00) 114 (76.00) 150 (3.73)
Heavy drinker 22 (27.85) 57 (72.15) 79 (1.97)
Total 1,552 (38.66) 2,463 (61.34) 4,015 (100.00)
Table 4. Condom use behavior at last sex with different sexual partners among Ghanaian men who have sex with men.
Table 4. Condom use behavior at last sex with different sexual partners among Ghanaian men who have sex with men.
Variables Number (n) Percentage (%)
Condom use at last sex with main/regular male partner a
No main/regular male partner 550 13.9
Yes 2,288 67.1
No 1,123 32.9
Sub-total 3,411 100.0
Condom use at last sex with a casual male partner b
No casual male partner 1,588 40.2
Yes 1,574 66.6
No 789 33.4
Sub-total 2,363 100.0
Condom use at last sold sex to a male in exchange for money c
Have not sold sex to a male in exchange for money 2,325 58.8
Yes 1,091 67.0
No 538 33.0
Sub-total 1,629 100.0
Condom use at last bought sex with a male d
Do not have a male from whom I bought sex in exchange for money 2,856 72.03
Yes 699 63.0
No 410 37.0
Sub-total 1,109 100.0
Condom use at last sex with a male from whom you received gifts or goods, e
Do not have a man I received gifts or goods in exchange for sex 2,574 64.8
Yes 948 67.9
No 449 32.1
Sub-total 1,397 100.0
Condom use at last sex with a male to whom you gave gifts or goods for sex f
Do not have a man I gave gifts or goods in exchange for sex 2,946 74.3
Yes 648 63.7
No 370 36.3
Sub-total 1,018 100.0
Condom use at last sex with a main female partner g
Do not have a female partner 1,743 43.9
Do not have a main female partner 315 7.9
Yes 893 46.6
No 1,022 53.4
Sub-total 1,915 100.0
Condom use at last sex with a casual female partner h
Do not have a female partner 1,743 43.7
Do not have a casual female partner 1,259 31.6
Yes 537 54.5
No 448 45.5
Sub-total 985 100.0
Condom use at last sold sex to a female for money I
Have not sold sex to a female in exchange for money 3,344 83.7
Yes 368 56.6
No 282 43.4
Sub-total 650 100.0
Condom use at last sex with a man or a woman
Yes 2,409 61.9
No 1,482 38.1
Total 3,891 100.0
Sub-total is the sum of “Yes and No” responses, a an analysis based on a sub-sample of 3,411 MSM who had sex with a main/regular male partner, b an analysis based on a sub-sample of 2,363 MSM who had sex with a casual male partner, c an analysis based on a sub-sample of 1,629 MSM who sold sex to a male, d an analysis based on a sub-sample of 1,109 MSM who bought sex from a male, e an analysis based on a sub-sample of 1,397 MSM who had sex with a male from whom they received gifts or goods, fan analysis based on a sub-sample of 1,018 MSM who had sex with a male to whom they gave gifts or goods, g an analysis based on a sub-sample of 1,915 MSM who had sex with a main female partner, h an analysis based on a sub-sample of 985 MSM who had sex with a casual female partner, I an analysis based on a sub-sample of 650 MSM who sold sex to a female and ‘n’ is the frequency.
Table 5. Consistent condom use with lubricants among men who have sex with men.
Table 5. Consistent condom use with lubricants among men who have sex with men.
Variables Number (n) Percentage (%)
How often do you use condoms with lubricants when you have sex with a man or a woman?
Always 1,559 38.9
Most of the time 824 20.6
Sometimes 985 24.6
Rarely 286 7.1
Never 354 8.8
Total 4008 100.0
How often do you use condoms with lubricants when you have penetrative anal sex with other males?
Always 1,795 44.9
Most of the time 505 12.6
Sometimes 870 21.8
Rarely 244 6.1
Never 582 14.6
Total 3,996 100.0
How often do you use condoms with lubricants when you have penetrative anal sex with females?
Always 1,104 40.0
Most of the time 271 9.8
Sometimes 621 22.4
Rarely 236 8.5
Never 535 19.3
Total 2,767 100.0
How often do you use lubricants for anal sex?
Always 2,207 55.1
Most of the time 507 12.6
Sometimes 636 15.9
Rarely 105 2.6
Never 553 13.8
Total 4008 100.0
Table 6. Factors associated with consistent condom use with lubricants among men who have sex with men in Ghana.
Table 6. Factors associated with consistent condom use with lubricants among men who have sex with men in Ghana.
Variables Bivariate analysis Multivariable analysis
% (n) Unadjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI) p-value Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI) p-value
Age category
18-24 62.96 (1,406) REF
25-34 33.32 (744) 1.09 (0.91-1.31) 0.333
35+ 3.72 (83) 1.07 (0.68-1.69) 0.774
Educational level
Less than primary 2.28 (51) REF REF
Primary school 3.00 (67) 1.55 (0.92-2.57) 0.093 1.16 (0.52-2.61) 0.717
Junior High school 26.11(583) 1.47 (1.00-2.15) 0.052 1.58 (0.83-3.00) 0.164
Senior High school 55.44 (1,238) 1.66 (1.15-2.42) 0.006* 1.76 (0.88-3.12) 0.039*
Tertiary or higher 13.17 (294) 1.99 (1.33-3.00) 0.012* 2.24 (0.86-3.23) 0.041*
Marital status
Married/living with a woman 4.75 (106) REF
Single/Never Married 94.04 (2,100) 1.42 (0.93-2.17) 0.103
Widowed/Divorced/Separated 1.21 (27) 1.59 (0.66-3.80) 0.298
Employment
Unemployed 39.23 (876) REF REF
Employed 45.77 (1,022) 0.75 (0.62-0.90) 0.002** 1.17 (0.85-1.59) 0.336
Sex worker 15.00 (335) 0.83 (0.64-1.07) 0.150 1.41 (1.00-1.98) 0.048*
Religion
Christianity 73.13 (1,633) REF REF
Islamic 12.94 (289) 0.64 (0.48-0.84) 0.001** 0.65 (0.49-0.87) 0.004**
Traditional 1.75 (39) 0.69 (0.35-1.37) 0.289 0.78 (0.38-1.60) 0.496
Other 9.40 (210) 1.19 (0.89-1.59) 0.249 1.14 (0 .83-1.55) 0.418
No religion 2.78 (62) 0.54 (0.30- 0.96) 0.036* 0.66 (0.36-1.21) 0.181
Income status (GHS)
No Income 32.38 (723) REF REF
Low Income (1-599 cedis/month) 50.47 (1,127) 0.58 (0.48-0.70) ˂0.001*** 0.57 (0.42-0.77) ˂0.001***
Middle Income (600-999 cedis/month) 7.61 (170) 0.73 (0.52-1.02) 0.069 0.65 (0.42-1.02) 0.062
High come (≥1000 cedis/month) 9.54 (213) 0.78 (0.57-1.07) 0.126 0.75 (0.49-1.16) 0.195
Sexual identity/orientation
Gay 41.51 (927) REF REF
Bisexual 47.11 (1,052) 0.85 (0. 71-1.02) 0.083 0.89 (0.73-1.09) 0.275
Transgender 0.31 (7) 4.08 (0.79- 21.16) 0.094 5.40 (1.00-29.27) 0.050
Other 11.06 (247) 1.70 (1.28-2.26) ˂0.001*** 1.83 (1.35-2.49) ˂0.001***
Type of anal sexual intercourse
Versatile sex 35.29 (788) REF REF
Receptive sex 22.03 (492) 1.19 (0.94-1.51) 0.141 1.11 (0.86-1.44) 0.403
Insertive sex 42.68 (953) 1.37 (1.12-1.66) 0.002** 1.26 (1.02-1.56) 0.029*
Number of receptive partners
One 73.00 (1,630) REF
Two or more 27.00 (603) 0 .85 (0.70-1.03) 0.102
Number of insertive partners
One 62.52 (1,396) REF
Two or more 37.48 (837) 1.02 (0.86-1.22) 0.786
Bought sex from a male in the past six months
Yes 19.03 (425) REF REF
No 80.97 (1,808) 1.54 (1.22-1.93) ˂0.001*** 1.32 (1.03-1.70) 0.027*
Sold sex to a male in the past six months
Yes 31.30 (699) REF
No 68.70 (1,534) 1.01 (0.84-1.21) 0.934
Alcohol intake
Abstainers 71.56 (1,598) REF REF
Light drinkers 21.72 (485) 0 .50 (0.40-0.63) ˂0.001*** 0.54 (0.42-0.68) ˂0.001***
Moderate drinkers 4.70 (105) 0.43 (0.27-0.68) ˂0.001*** 0.48 (0.30-0.78) 0.003**
Heavy drinkers 2.02 (45) 0.62 (0.33-1.17) 0.141 0.69 (0.35-1.35) 0.278
Good knowledge of HIV
No 32.69 (730) REF REF
Yes 67.31 (1,503) 1.80 (1.49-2.18) ˂0.001*** 1.79 (1.46-2.20) ˂0.001***
Syphilis status
Positive 0.99 (22) REF
Negative 99.01 (2,211) 0.50 (0.22-1.17) 0.109
Hepatitis b (HBsAg) status
Positive 7.57 (169) REF
Negative 92.43 (2,064) 0.82 (0.60-1.13) 0.235
Knowing one’s HIV status
Yes 17.64 (394) REF
No 82.36 (1,839) 1.00 (0.80-1.25) 0.976
Condom accessibility
Very easy 84.24 (1,881) REF REF
Easy 12.09 (270) 0.53 (0.39-0.70) ˂0.001*** 0.52 (0.37-0.72) ˂0.001***
Somewhat easy 3.67 (82) 0.23 (0.12-0.43) ˂0.001*** 0.27 (0.14-0.54) ˂0.001***
Affordability of condoms
Very affordable 81.42 (1,181) REF REF
Somewhat affordable 13.12 (293) 0.75 (0.58-0.98) 0.033* 1.19 (0.87-1.63) 0.265
Expensive 5.46 (122) 0.76 (0.52-1.13) 0.177 1.20 (0.78-1.84) 0.416
Abstainer means do not take alcohol; light drinker means 1-3 drinks/week; moderate drinker means 4-5 drinks/week; and heavy drinker means 6-12 drinks/week. * Means p˂0.05, ** means p˂0.01, *** means p˂0.001, REF means Reference category, ‘n’ is frequency, and CI means Confidence interval.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated