Submitted:
10 January 2025
Posted:
10 January 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
- H1: Online Banking Service Clues have a direct positive relationship with Customer Satisfaction.
- H2: Online Banking Service Clues (Functional Clues) have a direct positive relationship with Customer Experience.
- H3: Online Banking Service Clues (Mechanic Clues) have a direct positive relationship with Customer Experience.
- H4: Online Banking Service Clues (Humanic Clues) have a direct positive relationship with Customer Experience.
- H5: Customer Experience has a direct positive relationship with Customer Satisfaction.
- H6: Customer Experience mediates the effects of Online Banking Service Clues (Functional Clues) on Customer Satisfaction.
- H7: Customer Experience mediates the effects of Online Banking Service Clues (Mechanic Clues) on Customer Satisfaction.
- H8: Customer Experience mediates the effects of Online Banking Service Clues (Humanic Clues) on Customer Satisfaction.
- H9: Gender has a significant moderating effect on the relationship between online banking service clues and customer satisfaction.
- H10: Age has a significant moderating effect on the relationship between online banking service clues and customer satisfaction.
- H11: Education level has a significant moderating effect on the relationship between online banking service clues and customer satisfaction.
- H12: Occupation has a significant moderating effect on the relationship between online banking service clues and customer satisfaction.
- H13: Income level has a significant moderating effect on the relationship between online banking service clues and customer satisfaction.
2. Literature Review
2.1. Customer Experience
2.2. Service Clues
2.3. Customer Satisfaction
2.3.1. Customer Satisfaction in Online Banking
2.4. Expectancy Disconfirmation Theory
2.5. Hypothesis Development and Research Framework
2.5.1. Online Service Clues and Customer Satisfaction
2.5.2. Online Service Clues and Customer Experience
- H2: Online Banking Service Clues (Functional Clues) have a direct positive relationship with Customer Experience.
- H3: Online Banking Service Clues (Mechanic Clues) have a direct positive relationship with Customer Experience.
- H4: Online Banking Service Clues (Humanic Clues) have a direct positive relationship with Customer Experience.
2.5.3. Customer Experience and Customer Satisfaction
- H5: Customer Experience has a direct positive relationship with Customer Satisfaction.
2.5.4. Mediating Effect of Customer Experience
- H6: Customer Experience mediates the effects of Online Banking Service Clues (Functional Clues) on Customer Satisfaction.
- H7: Customer Experience mediates the effects of Online Banking Service Clues (Mechanic Clues) on Customer Satisfaction.
- H8: Customer Experience mediates the effects of Online Banking Service Clues (Humanic Clues) on Customer Satisfaction.
2.5.5. Demographics, Service Clues and Customer Satisfaction
- H9: Gender has a significant moderating effect on the relationship between online banking service clues and customer satisfaction.
- H10: Age has a significant moderating effect on the relationship between online banking service clues and customer satisfaction.
- H11: Education level has a significant moderating effect on the relationship between online banking service clues and customer satisfaction.
- H12: Occupation has a significant moderating effect on the relationship between online banking service clues and customer satisfaction.
- H13: Income level has a significant moderating effect on the relationship between online banking service clues and customer satisfaction.
3. Methodology
3.1. Population and Sample
3.2. Data Collection
3.3. Questionnaire Construct
3.3.1. Demographic Characteristics
| Variable | Description | Frequency | Percentage |
| Gender | Female | 250 | 62.50 |
| Male | 150 | 37.50 | |
| Total | 400 | 100 | |
| Age | 20 years and below | 2 | 0.50 |
| 21-30 years | 81 | 20.25 | |
| 31-40 years | 193 | 48.25 | |
| 41-50 years | 82 | 20.50 | |
| 51-60 years | 28 | 7.00 | |
| 61 years and above | 14 | 3.50 | |
| Total | 400 | 100 | |
| Type of customer | Individual bank customers | 200 | 50.00 |
| Corporate bank customers | 200 | 50.00 | |
| Total | 400 | 100 | |
| Academic qualification |
Primary school | 3 | 0.75 |
| Secondary school | 6 | 1.50 | |
| High school | 13.5 | ||
| Bachelor’s degree | 17554 | 43.75 | |
| Two-year associate degree | 27 | 6.75 | |
| Master’s degree and above | 135 | 33.75 | |
| Total | 400 | 100 | |
| Occupation | Private sector employee | 58 | 14.50 |
| Public sector employee | 17 | 4.25 | |
| Retired | 18 | 4.50 | |
| Self-employed | 47 | 11.75 | |
| Business owner | 200 | 50.00 | |
| Others | 60 | 15.00 | |
| Total | 400 | 100 | |
| Monthly income | 15 750TL and less | 52 | 13.00 |
| 15 750TL to 20 000TL | 85 | 21.25 | |
| 20 000TL to 25 000TL | 56 | 14.00 | |
| 25 000TL to 30 000TL | 80 | 20.00 | |
| 30 000TL to 35 000TL | 36 | 9.00 | |
| 35 000TL to 40 000TL | 24 | 6.00 | |
| 45 000TL and more | 67 | 16.75 | |
| Total | 400 | 100 |
3.3.2. Measurement
- -Functional Clues: These were assessed based on criteria such as functional quality, trust, and convenience.
- -Mechanic Clues: Measurement for these clues focused on aspects of website design and usability.
- -Humanic Clues: This category was evaluated through customer complaint handling practices.
3.4. Data Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Measurement Model Results
| Constructs | Factor loadings |
Outer weight (p-values) |
Variance Inflation Factor | |||
| Individual Customer | Corporate Customer | Individual Customer | Corporate Customer | |||
| Trust (TR) | TR1 | 0.761 | 0.812 | 0.000 | 2.945 | - |
| TR2 | - | 0.798 | 0.000 | 2.820 | - | |
| TR3 | 0.733 | 0.800 | 0.000 | - | - | |
| Functional Quality (FQ) | FQ5 | - | 0.804 | 0.000 | - | 1.708 |
| Web design (WD) | WD3 | 0.735 | 0.786 | 0.000 | - | 1.761 |
| WD4 | - | 0.793 | 0.000 | 1.748 | - | |
| WD5 | - | 0.764 | 0.000 | - | 1.940 | |
| WD6 | - | 0.805 | 0.000 | - | - | |
| WD8 | 0.729 | 0.719 | 0.000 | - | 2.006 | |
| Customer Complaint Handling (CCH) | CCH1 | 0.856 | 0.833 | 0.000 | - | 1.775 |
| CCH2 | 0.864 | 0.817 | 0.000 | 1.912 | 1.831 | |
| CCH3 | 0.846 | 0.823 | 0.000 | 1.649 | - | |
| Customer Experience (CE) |
CE1 | 0.811 | - | 0.000 | 2.048 | 1.415 |
| CE2 | 0.781 | 0.733 | 0.000 | 1.897 | 1.415 | |
| CE3 | 0.826 | 0.716 | 0.000 | 1.420 | 1.584 | |
| CE4 | - | 0.745 | 0.000 | 1.405 | - | |
| CE5 | - | 0.779 | 0.000 | 1.524 | 1.369 | |
| Convenience (CNV) |
CNV1 | 0.791 | 0.818 | 0.000 | - | 1.725 |
| CNV2 | 0.792 | 0.810 | 0.000 | - | 1.387 | |
| CNV3 | 0.767 | 0.806 | 0.000 | 1.711 | 1.900 | |
| Website Usability (WU) |
WU2 | - | 0.769 | 0.000 | 1.906 | 2.120 |
| WU3 | 0.750 | 0.777 | 0.000 | 1.827 | 2.122 | |
| WU4 | 0.701 | 0.794 | 0.000 | 1.374 | 1.403 | |
| WU5 | 0.775 | 0.782 | 0.000 | 1.519 | 1.516 | |
| WU6 | 0.780 | 0.795 | 0.000 | 1.564 | - | |
| WU7 | 0.756 | 0.803 | 0.000 | - | 1.406 | |
| Cronbach’s alpha | Rho_A | Rho_C | ||
| Individual customer model | Customer experience | 0.731 | 0.733 | 0.848 |
| Customer satisfaction | 0.740 | 0.747 | 0.851 | |
| Functional clues | 0.829 | 0.834 | 0.879 | |
| Humanic clues | 0.818 | 0.827 | 0.891 | |
| Mechanic clues | 0.868 | 0.874 | 0.898 | |
| Corporate customer model | Customer experience | 0.761 | 0.767 | 0.848 |
| Customer satisfaction | 0.728 | 0.730 | 0.846 | |
| Functional clues | 0.830 | 0.835 | 0.887 | |
| Humanic clues | 0.703 | 0.705 | 0.870 | |
| Mechanic clues | 0.871 | 0.874 | 0.901 |
4.2. Structural Model Results
| Individual customer | Corporate customer | ||||||
| β | p-value | f-square | β | p-value | f-square | ||
| H1(a) | FC->CS | 0.054 | 0.412 | 1.254 | -0.100 | 0.381 | 1.203 |
| H1(b) | MC->CS | 0.760 | 0.001* | 1.814 | 1.028 | 0.000* | 1.728 |
| H1(c) | HC->CS | -0.110 | 0.392 | 1.215 | -0.015 | 0.832 | 1.016 |
| Combined model | |||||||
| Β | t-sta. | p-value | |||||
| H2 | FC->CE | 0.298 | 4.096 | 0.000* | |||
| H3 | MC->CE | 0.888 | 3.627 | 0.000* | |||
| H4 | HC->CE | 0.003 | 7.491 | 0.000* | |||
| H5 | CE->CS | 0.109 | 5.010 | 0.000* | |||
4.3. Test of the Mediating Effects
4.4. Test of the Moderating Effects
| Variable | Description | Unconstrained | Structured weight | Model Comparison | |||
| Β | p | β | p | χ (p) | |||
| H9 | Gender | Male Female |
0.647 0.410 |
0.000 0.015 |
0.926 0.788 |
0.000 0.000 |
12.819 (0.000)* |
| H10 | Age | 20 years and below 21-30 years 31-40 years 41-50 years 51-60 years 61 years and above |
0.556 0.977 1.148 0.633 0.252 0.041 |
0.000 0.002 0.042 0.000 0.001 0.004 |
0.066 0.082 1.156 1.192 0.044 0.070 |
0.000 0.002 0.042 0.000 0.001 0.004 |
17.514 (0.000)* |
| H11 | Education | Primary school Secondary school High school Bachelor’s degree Two-year degree Master’s degree & above |
0.025 0.189 0.368 0.743 1.981 1.452 |
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 |
0.05 0.39 0.44 1.03 1.64 1.65 |
0.000 0.002 0.042 0.000 0.000 0.000 |
10.686 (0.000)* |
| H12 | Occupation | Private sector employee Public sector employee Retired Self-employed Business owner Others |
0.113 0.000 0.000 0.630 1.400 0.000 |
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 |
0.551 0.890 0.140 1.03 0.015 0.044 |
0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.001 |
8.193 (0.000)* |
| H13 | Income | 15 750TL and less 15 750TL to 20 000TL 20 000TL to 25 000TL 25 000TL to 30 000TL 30 000TL to 35 000TL 35 000TL to 40 000TL 45 000TL and more |
0.172 0.272 0.593 0.622 0.548 0.716 0.945 |
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 |
0.263 0.287 0.196 1.032 1.150 1.770 1.100 |
0.028 0.016 0.039 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 |
11.714 (0.000)* |
4.5. Summary of Individual and Corporate Customer Satisfaction
5. Discussion
5.1. Findings of the Study
- H1: Online Banking Service Clues have a direct positive relationship with Customer Satisfaction.
- H2: Online Banking Service Clues (Functional Clues) have a direct positive relationship with Customer Experience.
- H3: Online Banking Service Clues (Mechanic Clues) have a direct positive relationship with Customer Experience.
- H4: Online Banking Service Clues (Humanic Clues) have a direct positive relationship with Customer Experience.
- H5: Customer Experience has a direct positive relationship with Customer Satisfaction.
- H6: Customer Experience mediates the effects of Online Banking Service Clues (Functional Clues) on Customer Satisfaction.
- H7: Customer Experience mediates the effects of Online Banking Service Clues (Mechanic Clues) on Customer Satisfaction.
- H8: Customer Experience mediates the effects of Online Banking Service Clues (Humanic Clues) on Customer Satisfaction.
- H9: Gender has a significant moderating effect on the relationship between online banking service clues and customer satisfaction.
- H10: Age has a significant moderating effect on the relationship between online banking service clues and customer satisfaction.
- H1: Education level has a significant moderating effect on the relationship between online banking service clues and customer satisfaction.
- H12: Occupation has a significant moderating effect on the relationship between online banking service clues and customer satisfaction.
- H13: Income level has a significant moderating effect on the relationship between online banking service clues and customer satisfaction.
5.2. Managerial Implications
5.3. Theoretical Implications
5.4. Limitations and Future Research Suggestions
5.5. Conclusion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zeebaree, M., Ismael, G. Y., Nakshabandi, O. A., Saleh, S. S., & Aqel, M. (2020). Impact of innovation technology in enhancing organizational management. Studies of Applied Economics, 38(4), 3970. [CrossRef]
- Banu, A. M., Mohamed, N. S., & Parayitam, S. (2019). Online banking and customer satisfaction: evidence from India. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation, 15(1-2), 68-80. [CrossRef]
- Sleimi, M., & Musleh, M. (2020). E-Banking services quality and customer loyalty: The moderating effect of customer service satisfaction: Empirical evidence from the UAE banking sector. Management Science Letters, 10(15), 3663–3674. [CrossRef]
- Almaiah, M. A., Al-Rahmi, A. M., Alturise, F., Alrawad, M., Alkhalaf, S., Lutfi, A., ... & Awad, A. B. (2022). Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking: An integration of ISSM and UTAUT with price value and perceived risk. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 919198. [CrossRef]
- Wiryawan, D., Suhartono, J., Hiererra, S. E., & Gui, A. (2022). Factors affecting digital banking customer satisfaction in Indonesia using D&M model. In 2022 10th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM) (pp. 01-04). IEEE.
- Kesa, D. D. (2018). Cosumer Perception Toward Online Banking Services to Build Brand Loyalty: Evidence from Indonesia. KnE Social Sciences, 1183-1191. [CrossRef]
- Suchánek, P., & Králová, M. (2019). Customer satisfaction, loyalty, knowledge and competitiveness in the food industry. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 32(1), 1237–1255. [CrossRef]
- Manyanga, W., Makanyeza, C., & Muranda, Z. (2022). The effect of customer experience, customer satisfaction and word of mouth intention on customer loyalty: The moderating role of consumer demographics. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 2082015. [CrossRef]
- Haeckel, S. H., Carbone, L. P., & Berry, L. L. (2003). How to lead the customer experience. Marketing Management, 12(1), 18-18.
- Rita, P., Oliveira, T., & Farisa, A. (2019). The impact of e-service quality and customer satisfaction on customer behavior in online shopping. Heliyon, 5(10), e02690. [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, R. R., Romeika, G., Kauliene, R., Streimikis, J., & Dapkus, R. (2020). ES-QUAL model and customer satisfaction in online banking: evidence from multivariate analysis techniques. Oeconomia Copernicana, 11(1), 59–93. [CrossRef]
- Alhassany, H., & Faisal, F. (2018). Factors influencing the internet banking adoption decision in North Cyprus: an evidence from the partial least square approach of the structural equation modeling. Financial Innovation, 4, 1-21. [CrossRef]
- Ozatac, N., Saner, T., & Sen, Z. S. (2016). Customer satisfaction in the banking sector: the case of North Cyprus. Procedia Economics and Finance, 39, 870-878. [CrossRef]
- Altay, O., & Olkan, L. A. (2015). 2009-2013 Döneminde KKTC’deki Ticari Bankaların Performans Analizi. EUL Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 59-75.
- Kutlay, K. (2017, September). Kuzey Kıbrıs’ ta Banka Karlığını Etkileyen Faktörler: Ampirik bir Çalışma. In Proceedings of 2 nd International Conference on Scientific Cooperation for the Future in the Economics and Administrative Sciences (p. 231).
- Yeşilada, T., & Yalyalı, P. (2016). KKTC’de Bankacılık Sektöründe Şube ve Personel Sayısındaki Gelişmeler ile Veri Zarflama Analizi Yöntemi Kullanılarak Yapılan Etkinlik Analizi Çalışması, Lefke Avrupa Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(1), 27-49.
- Şafakli, O. V. (2017). Perceptions of academicians towards the reasons of using internet banking: Case of Cyprus. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 7(1), 197-202.
- Serener, B. (2017). Internet bankıng adoptıon ın Cyprus: adopters versus non-adopters. Ponte International Journal of Science and Research, 73(1).
- Serener, B. (2018). Barriers to the use of internet banking among Nigerian and Zimbabwean students in Cyprus. Journal of Management and Economics Research, 16(1), 347-357.
- Jenkins, H., Hesami, S., & Yesiltepe, F. (2022). Factors Affecting Internet Banking Adoption: An Application of Adaptive LASSO. Computers, Materials & Continua, 72(3), 6167-6184. [CrossRef]
- Chauhan, S., Akhtar, A., & Gupta, A. (2022). Customer experience in digital banking: A review and future research directions. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 14(2), 311-348. [CrossRef]
- Wasan, P. (2018). “Predicting customer experience and discretionary behaviors of bank customers in India”. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 36(4), 701-725. [CrossRef]
- Carbone, L. P., & Haeckel, S. H. (1994). Engineering Customer Experiences. Journal of Marketing Management, 3(3), 8-19.
- Hussadintorn Na Ayutthaya, D., & Koomsap, P. (2019). Improving Experience Clues on a Journey for Better Customer Perceived Value. In Transdisciplinary Engineering for Complex Socio-technical Systems (pp. 53-62). IOS Press.
- Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2016). Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey. Journal of marketing, 80(6), 69-96. [CrossRef]
- Godovykh, M., & Tasci, A.D.A. (2020). Customer experience in tourism: A review of definitions, components, and measurements. Tourism Management Perspectives, 35, 1-10. [CrossRef]
- Chepur, J., & Bellamkonda, R. (2019). Examining the conceptualizations of customer experience as a construct. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 23(1), 1-9.
- Heinonen, K., & Lipkin, M. (2023). Ordinary customer experience: Conceptualization, characterization, and implications. Psychology & Marketing, 40(9), 1720-1736. [CrossRef]
- Rais, N. M., Musa, R., & Muda, M. (2016). Reconceptualisation of customer experience quality (CXQ) measurement scale. Procedia Economics and Finance, 37, 299-303. [CrossRef]
- Bhatnagr, P., Rajesh, A., & Misra, R. (2024). A study on driving factors for enhancing financial performance and customer-centricity through digital banking. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 16(2), 218-250. [CrossRef]
- Amenuvor, F. E., Owusu-Antwi, K., Basilisco, R., & Bae, S. C. (2019). Customer Experience and Behavioral Intentions: The Mediation Role of Customer Perceived Value. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 7(10), 1359-1374. [CrossRef]
- Gahler, M., Klein, J. F., & Paul, M. (2023). Customer Experience: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Application in Omnichannel Environments. Journal of Service Research, 26(2), 191-211. [CrossRef]
- Lin, W. R., Wang, Y. H., & Hung, Y. M. (2020). Analyzing the factors influencing adoption intention of internet banking: Applying DEMATEL-ANP-SEM approach. PloS one, 15(2), e0227852. [CrossRef]
- De Keyser, A., Verleye, K., Lemon, K. N., Keiningham, T. L., & Klaus, P. (2020). Moving the Customer Experience Field Forward: Introducing the Touchpoints, Context, Qualities (TCQ) Nomenclature. Journal of Service Research, 23(4), 433-455. [CrossRef]
- Flacandji, M., & Krey, N. (2020). Remembering shopping experiences: the shopping experience memory scale. Journal of Business Research, 107, 279-289. [CrossRef]
- Arici, H. E., Köseoglu, M. A., & Sökmen, A. (2022). The intellectual structure of customer experience research in service scholarship: A bibliometric analysis. The Service Industries Journal, 42(7-8), 514-550. [CrossRef]
- Ban, H. J., & Jun, J. K. (2019). A study on the semantic network analysis of luxury hotel and business hotel through the big data. Culinary Science & Hospitality Research, 25(1), 18–28.
- Almansour, B., & Elkrghli, S. (2023). Factors influencing customer satisfaction on e-banking services: a study of Libyan banks. International Journal of Technology, Innovation and Management (IJTIM), 3(1), 34-42. [CrossRef]
- Gronroos, C. (1984). A service quality model and its marketing implications. European Journal of Marketing, 18(4), 36–44. [CrossRef]
- Nkwede, M. F. C., Ogba, I. E., & Nkwede, F. E. (2022). Determinants of customer satisfaction in a high-contact service environment: a study of selected hotels in Abakaliki metropolis, Nigeria. Research in Hospitality management, 12(2), 183-190. [CrossRef]
- Taherdoost, H. (2018). A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories. Procedia manufacturing, 22, 960-967. [CrossRef]
- Sathar, M. B. A., Rajagopalan, M., Naina, S. M., & Parayitam, S. (2022). A moderated-mediation model of perceived enjoyment, security and trust on customer satisfaction: evidence from banking industry in India. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 17(3), 656-679. [CrossRef]
- Bleier, A., Harmeling, C. M., & Palmatier, R. W. (2019). Creating effective online customer experiences. Journal of marketing, 83(2), 98-119. [CrossRef]
- Ma, Y. (2021). Elucidating determinants of customer satisfaction with live-stream shopping: An extension of the information systems success model. Telematics and Informatics, 65, 101707. [CrossRef]
- Cele, N. N., & Kwenda, S. (2024). Do cybersecurity threats and risks have an impact on the adoption of digital banking? A systematic literature review. Journal of Financial Crime.
- Shaikh, I. M., & Amin, H. (2024). Influence of innovation diffusion factors on non-users’ adoption of digital banking services in the banking 4.0 era. Information Discovery and Delivery (ahead-of-print).
- Park, J., Yoo, J. W., Cho, Y., & Park, H. (2024). Understanding switching intentions between traditional banks and Internet-only banks among Generation X and Generation Z. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 42(5), 1114-1141. [CrossRef]
- Raza, S. A., Umer, A., Qureshi, M. A., & Dahri, A. S. (2020). Internet banking service quality, e-customer satisfaction and loyalty: the modified e-SERVQUAL model. The TQM Journal, 32(6), 1443-1466. [CrossRef]
- Zia, A. (2022). Discovering the linear relationship of service quality, satisfaction, attitude and loyalty for banks in Albaha, Saudi Arabia. PSU Research Review, 6(2), 90-104. [CrossRef]
- Supriyanto, A., Wiyono, B. B., Burhanuddin, B., & Olan, F. (2021). Effects of service quality and customer satisfaction on loyalty of bank customers. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1937847. [CrossRef]
- Lei, Z., Duan, H., Zhang, L., Ergu, D., & Liu, F. (2022). The main influencing factors of customer satisfaction and loyalty in city express delivery. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1044032. [CrossRef]
- Mazhar, M., Hooi Ting, D., Zaib Abbasi, A., Nadeem, M. A., & Abbasi, H. A. (2022). Gauging customers’ negative disconfirmation in online post-purchase behaviour: The moderating role of service recovery. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 2072186. [CrossRef]
- Siddique, J., Shamim, A., Nawaz, M., Faye, I., & Rehman, M. (2021). Co-creation or co-destruction: a perspective of online customer engagement valence. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 591753. [CrossRef]
- Islam, R., Ahmed, S., Rahman, M., & Al Asheq, A. (2021), "Determinants of service quality and its effect on customer satisfaction and loyalty: an empirical study of private banking sector", The TQM Journal, 33(6), 1163-1182. [CrossRef]
- Yüksel, A., & Yüksel, F. (2008). Consumer satisfaction theories: a critical review. Tourist satisfaction and complaining behavior: Measurement and management issues in the tourism and hospitality industry, 65-88.
- Rust, R. T., & Oliver, R. L. (1994). Service quality: Insights and managerial implications from the frontier. Service Quality: New Directions in Theory and Practice, 7(12), 1–19.
- Zhang, J., Chen, W., Petrovsky, N., & Walker, R. M. (2022). The expectancy-disconfirmation model and citizen satisfaction with public services: A meta-analysis and an agenda for best practice. Public Administration Review, 82(1), 147-159. [CrossRef]
- Zamani, E. D., & Pouloudi, N. (2021). Generative mechanisms of workarounds, discontinuance and reframing: a study of negative disconfirmation with consumerised IT. Information systems journal, 31(3), 384-428. [CrossRef]
- Sreelakshmi, CC., & Prathap, S. K. (2020). Continuance adoption of mobile-based payments in Covid-19 context: an integrated framework of health belief model and expectation confirmation model. International Journal of Pervasive Computing and Communications, 16(4), 351-369. [CrossRef]
- Gautam, D. K., & Sah, G. K. (2023). Online Banking Service Practices and Its Impact on E-Customer Satisfaction and E-Customer Loyalty in Developing Country of South Asia-Nepal. Sage Open, 13(3), 1-14. [CrossRef]
- Ayinaddis, S. G., Taye, B. A., & Yirsaw, B. G. (2023). Examining the effect of electronic banking service quality on customer satisfaction and loyalty: an implication for technological innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(1), 22. [CrossRef]
- Khan, F. N., Arshad, M. U., & Munir, M. (2023). Impact of e-service quality on e-loyalty of online banking customers in Pakistan during the Covid-19 pandemic: mediating role of e-satisfaction. Future Business Journal, 9(1), 23. [CrossRef]
- Anouze, A.L.M. and Alamro, A.S. (2020), "Factors affecting intention to use e-banking in Jordan", International Journal of Bank Marketing, 38(1), 86-112. [CrossRef]
- Park, S., & Han, J. J. (2023). The Effects of Service Clues on Likelihoods of Additional Purchase. Journal of Student Research, 12(4). [CrossRef]
- Quiber, N., D., B. (2023). Impact of online banking in customer’s behavior in San Pablo City, Laguna. Journal Of Third World Economics (JTWE), 1(1), 14-17.
- Berry, L. L., Wall, E. A., & Carbone, L. P. (2006). Service clues and customer assessment of the service experience: Lessons from marketing. Academy of management perspectives, 20(2), 43-57. [CrossRef]
- Borishade, T. T. (2017). Customer experience management and loyalty in healthcare sector: a study of selected private hospitals in Lagos State, Nigeria. Doctoral dissertation, Covenant University, Ota, Nigeria.
- Liu, F., Lai, K. H., Wu, J., & Duan, W. (2021). Listening to online reviews: A mixed-methods investigation of customer experience in the sharing economy. Decision Support Systems, 149, 113609. [CrossRef]
- Prentice, C., & Nguyen, M. (2020). Engaging and retaining customers with AI and employee service. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 56, 102186. [CrossRef]
- Zaid, S., & Patwayati, P. (2021). Impact of customer experience and customer engagement on satisfaction and loyalty: A case study in Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(4), 983-992.
- Ha, M. T. (2021). The impact of customer experience on customer satisfaction and customer loyalty. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(14), 1027-1038.
- Tjahjaningsih, E., Widyasari, S., Maskur, A., & Kusuma, L. (2021). The Effect of Customer Experience and Service Quality on Satisfaction in Increasing Loyalty. In The 3rd International Conference On Banking, Accounting, Management And Economics (Icobame 2020) (pp. 395-399). Atlantis Press.
- Verhoef, P. C., Lemon, K. N., Parasuraman, A., Roggeveen, A., Tsiros, M., & Schlesinger, L. A. (2009). Customer experience creation: Determinants, dynamics and management strategies. Journal of retailing, 85(1), 31-41. [CrossRef]
- Kamath, P.R., Pai, Y.P., & Prabhu, N.K.P. (2019). Building customer loyalty in retail banking: a serial-mediation approach. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 38(2), 456-484. [CrossRef]
- Kamboj, N., & Singh, G. (2018). Customer satisfaction with digital banking in India: Exploring the mediating role of demographic factors. Indian Journal of Computer Science, 3(2), 9–32.
- Bhatt, A., & Bhatt, S. (2016). Factors affecting customer adoption of mobile banking services. The Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 21(1), 1.
- Sambaombe, J. K., & Phiri, J. (2021). An analysis of the impact of online banking on customer satisfaction in commercial banks based on the TRA model (a case study of stanbic bank Lusaka main branch). Open Journal of Business and Management, 10(1), 369-386. [CrossRef]
- Wang, S. H., & Pang, Y. L. (2021). Demographics and customer satisfaction. EPRA International Journal of Environmental Economics, Commerce and Educational Management, 8(9), 1-6.
- Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., & Anderson, R.E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. London:Pearson.
- Rahi, S. (2017). Research design and methods: A systematic review of research paradigms, sampling issues and instruments development. International Journal of Economics & Management Sciences, 6(2), 1-5.
- Turner, D. P. (2020). Sampling Methods in Research Design. Headache: The Journal of Head & Face Pain, 60(1).
- Bouafi, S. (2020). The Effects of Digital Banking on Customer Experience, Customer Satisfaction, and Customer Loyalty in Morocco. Master's thesis, Eastern Mediterranean University.
- Altobishi, T., Erboz, G., & Podruzsik, S. J. I. J. O. M. S. (2018). E-Banking effects on customer satisfaction: The survey on clients in Jordan Banking Sector. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 10(2), 151-161. [CrossRef]
- Wolfinbarger, M., & Gilly, M. C. (2003). eTailQ: dimensionalizing, measuring and predicting etail quality. Journal of retailing, 79(3), 183-198. [CrossRef]
- Flavián, C., Guinalíu, M., & Gurrea, R. (2006). The role played by perceived usability, satisfaction and consumer trust on website loyalty. Information & management, 43(1), 1-14. [CrossRef]
- Christine Roy, M., Dewit, O., & Aubert, B. A. (2001). The impact of interface usability on trust in web retailers. Internet research, 11(5), 388-398. [CrossRef]
- Kirakowski, J., & Cierlik, B. (1998, October). Measuring the usability of web sites. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meeting (Vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 424-428). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
- Chahal, H., & Dutta, K. (2015). Measurement and impact of customer experience in banking sector. Decision, 42, 57-70. [CrossRef]
- Garg, R., Rahman, Z., & Kumar, I. (2010). Evaluating a model for analyzing methods used for measuring customer experience. Journal of Database Marketing and Customer Strategy Management, 17(2), 78-90. [CrossRef]
- Klaus, P. P., & Maklan, S. (2013). Towards a better measure of customer experience. International journal of market research. 55(2, 227-246. [CrossRef]
- Liang, C. J., Wang, W. H., & Farquhar, J. D. (2009). The influence of customer perceptions on financial performance in financial services. Marketing, 27(2), 129-149. [CrossRef]
- Mbama, C. I., Ezepue, P., Alboul, L., & Beer, M. (2018). Digital banking, customer experience and financial performance. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 12(4), 230-251.
- Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European business review, 31(1), 2-24. [CrossRef]
- Tabachnick, B.G. and Fidell, L.S. (2007), Using Multivariate Statistics (5th ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.
- McQuitty, S. (2004). Statistical power and structural equation models in business research. Journal of Business Research, 57(2), 175-83. [CrossRef]
- Miles, J., & Shevlin, M. (1998). Effects of sample size, model specification and factor loadings on the GFI in confirmatory factor analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 85-90. [CrossRef]
- Bentler, P.M. & Bonnet, D.C. (1980). Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606.
- Hu, L.T. and Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. [CrossRef]
- Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Sinkovics, N., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2023). A perspective on using partial least squares structural equation modelling in data articles. Data in Brief, 48, 109074. [CrossRef]
- Marcoulides, K. M., & Raykov, T. (2019). Evaluation of Variance Inflation Factors in Regression Models Using Latent Variable Modeling Methods. Educational and psychological measurement, 79(5), 874–882. [CrossRef]
- Bhatti, W. A., Glowik, M., & Arslan, A. (2021). Knowledge sharing motives and value co-creation behavior of the consumers in physiotherapy services: a cross-cultural study. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(5), 1128-1145. [CrossRef]
- Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric Theory. New York: MacGrow-Hill Higher.
- Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1997). Statistics notes: Cronbach's alpha. BMJ, 314(7080), 572.
- Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in science education, 48, 1273-1296.
- Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., Ray, S., ... & Ray, S. (2021). Evaluation of reflective measurement models. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook, 75-90.
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 43, 115-135. [CrossRef]
- Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In Handbook of market research (pp. 587-632). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
- Borishade, T. T., Worlu, R., Ogunnaike, O. O., Aka, D. O., & Dirisu, J. I. (2021). Customer experience management: A study of mechanic versus humanic clues and student loyalty in Nigerian higher education institution. Sustainability, 13(12), 6563. [CrossRef]
- Quach, S., Barari, M., Moudry, D. V., & Quach, K. (2020). Service integration in omnichannel retailing and its impact on customer experience. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 65, 102267. [CrossRef]
- Franky, F., & Syah, T. Y. R. (2023). The Effect of Customer Experience, Customer Satisfaction, and Customer Loyalty on Brand Power and Willingness to Pay a Price Premium. Quantitative Economics and Management Studies, 4(3), 437-452. [CrossRef]
- Suharto, S., & Hoti, A. (2023). Relationship Marketing, Customer Experience and Customer Satisfaction: Testing Their Theoretical and Empirical Underpinning. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis, 14(1), 21-35. [CrossRef]
- Kubeyinje, G. T., & Omigie, S. O. (2022). The Influence Of Service Quality Dimensions On Customer Satisfaction In The Nigerian Banking Industry. Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, 7(special), 67-76. [CrossRef]
- Teeroovengadum, V. (2022). Service quality dimensions as predictors of customer satisfaction and loyalty in the banking industry: moderating effects of gender. European Business Review, 34(1), 1-19. [CrossRef]
- Lou, C., & Xie, Q. (2021). Something social, something entertaining? How digital content marketing augments consumer experience and brand loyalty. International Journal of Advertising, 40(3), 376-402. [CrossRef]
- Pei, X. L., Guo, J. N., Wu, T. J., Zhou, W. X., & Yeh, S. P. (2020). Does the effect of customer experience on customer satisfaction create a sustainable competitive advantage? A comparative study of different shopping situations. Sustainability, 12(18), 7436. [CrossRef]
- Shandilya, G., Dubey, A., & Srivastava, P. (2023). Analysing moderating effects of demographic variables on customer satisfaction: A study of quick service restaurant. Atna Journal of Tourism Studies, 18(1), 51-88. [CrossRef]




| Construct | Measurement Statements | Ref. |
| Functional Quality | 1. Internet and mobile devices facilitate banking services. | [82] |
| 2. Internet has improved the quality of banking services. | ||
| 3. It is easy to use internet for banking services. | ||
| 4. I am able to get on the website/mobile application quickly. | ||
| 5. It is easy for me to find what I need on the website/mobile application of my bank. | ||
| Trust | 1. I can trust my bank when I am using the Internet for any service. | [82] |
| 2. My bank’s services have a good reputation. | ||
| 3. I feel very comfortable doing any online banking service with my bank. | ||
| 4. My bank quickly resolves the problems that I encounter with my online operations. | ||
| Convenience | 1. Online banking services fit with my needs and wills. | [83] |
| 2. Online banking services afford great facilities. | ||
| 3. You can carry out online banking services anywhere. | ||
| Website Design |
1. The online banking’s website provides in-depth information. | [84] |
| 2. The online banking’s website does not confuse me in what I want to do with the website pages. | ||
| 3. The online banking’s webpage does not freeze after I input information. | ||
| 4. The site map of the online banking’s website is clear, the content and picture of the site are user-friendly. | ||
| 5. I can log-in to the online banking’s website easily. | ||
| 6. The online banking’s website loads quickly. | ||
| 7. The information provided by the online banking’s website is always updated in time. | ||
| 8. The online banking’s website offers my preferable service. | ||
| 9. The transaction outcome is informed clearly. | ||
| 10. It is quick and easy to complete a transaction on the online banking’s website. | ||
| 11. The level of personalization on the online banking’s website is about right, not too much or too little. | ||
| 12. The online banking’s web site does not waste my time. | ||
| Website Usability |
1. On this website, everything is easy to understand. | [85,86,87] |
| 2. This website is simple to use, even when using it for the first time. | ||
| 3. It is easy to find the information I need from this website. | ||
| 4. The structure and contents of this website are easy to understand. | ||
| 5. It is easy to navigate within this website. | ||
| 6. The organization of the contents of this site makes it easy for me to know where I am when navigating it. | ||
| 7. When I am navigating this site, I feel that I am in control of what I can do. | ||
| Customer Complaint Handling | 1. The online banking service is willing to respond to customer needs. | [84] |
| 2. When you have a problem, the online banking’s website shows a sincere interest in solving it. | ||
| 3. Inquiries are answered promptly through online customer service representatives. | ||
| 4. Customer service representatives are qualified and have good service attitude. | ||
| Customer Satisfaction | 1. I am satisfied with the online banking service. | [82] |
| 2. My bank’s online services meet my needs and expectations. | ||
| 3. I am satisfied with the electronic accessibility. | ||
| 4. I am satisfied with the staff in helping accessing online. | ||
| 5. I made a good decision when I choose my bank for online services. | ||
| Customer Experience | 1. My bank handles customer problems well. | [73,88,89,90,91,92] |
| 2. My bank offers prompt customer service. | ||
| 3. My bank’s products are ease to use. | ||
| 4. My bank always meets my service needs and requirements. | ||
| 5. My bank provides me error free services. | ||
| 6. My overall experience with my bank is pleasing. |
| Fit Indices |
Acceptable Value |
References |
| (χ2 /df) | ≤2 | [94] |
| RMSEA (Root mean square error of approximation) | ≤0.08 | [95] |
| GFI (Goodness-of-fit statistic) | ≥0.9 | [96] |
| AGFI (Adjusted goodness-of-fit statistic) | ≥0.9 | [94] |
| NFI (Normed-fit index) | ≥0.9 | [97] |
| CFI (Comparative fit index) | ≥0.9 | [98] |
| SRMR (Standardised root mean square residual) | ≤0.08 | [98] |
| CE | CS | FC | HC | MC | AVE | ||
| Individual customer model | CE | 0.650 | |||||
| CS | 0.782 | 0.655 | |||||
| FC | 0.669 | 0.754 | 0.592 | ||||
| HC | 0.872 | 0.599 | 0.891 | 0.732 | |||
| MC | 0.767 | 0.809 | 0.899 | 0.848 | 0.558 | ||
| Corporate Customer model | CE | 0.582 | |||||
| CS | 0.812 | 0.648 | |||||
| FC | 0.782 | 0.793 | 0.663 | ||||
| HC | 0.605 | 0.613 | 0.648 | 0.771 | |||
| MC | 0.545 | 0.566 | 0.581 | 0.593 | 0.564 |
| Hypothesis | Indirect effects | β | t-stat | p-value |
| H6 | HC->CE->CS | 0.019 | 0.107 | 0.821 |
| H7 | MC->CE->CS | 0.274 | 0.526 | 0.558 |
| H8 | FC->CE->CS | 0.029 | 0.452 | 0.446 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).