Submitted:
01 January 2025
Posted:
02 January 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Methodology
3. Theoretical Background
3.1. Information Contents of Digital Twins
3.2. CityGML Overview
3.3. Prior Research
4. Results
4.1. Current Status of Digital Twin Data in South Korea
4.2. Guidelines for Digital Twin Data Construction
4.2.1. Definition of CityGML Version (2.0 or 3.0)
4.2.2. Definition of Digital Twin Data Specifications
4.2.3. Essential Considerations for Digital Twin Data Construction
| Category | Mesh model | Object-segmented model |
|---|---|---|
| Image | ![]() |
![]() |
| Definition |
|
|
| Surface separation |
|
|
| Automation feasibility |
|
|
4.3. Implementation of Empirical Data Based on CityGML
4.3.1. Overview
4.3.2. Create UML
4.3.3. Development of XML Schema for Empirical Data Based on UML
4.3.4. Creation of GML for Empirical Data
5. Discussion
- Theoretical Background: The study adopts international standards such as OGC’s CityGML as the reference model for digital twin data. This choice supports the development of open, vendor-neutral data and ensures interoperability across different countries and heterogeneous systems. Furthermore, core concepts like Level of Detail (LoD) are systematically reviewed to establish a solid theoretical basis for digital twin data models.
- Current Status of Digital Twin Data: Despite adopting CityGML as a reference model, South Korea’s NDT policy lacks detailed guidelines and standardized processes for data construction. This gap has resulted in challenges such as defining LoD and structuring terrain objects. The study underscores the urgent need for comprehensive guidelines to address these issues effectively.
- Guidelines for Digital Twin Data Construction: The study introduces a detailed guide to support systematic data construction. The guidelines delineate the distinctions between CityGML 2.0 and 3.0, particularly concerning LoD definitions. By employing the Application Domain Extension (ADE) technique, the proposed data model incorporates the unique characteristics of South Korea’s spatial information. UML diagrams and XML schemas are utilized to visualize and organize the data construction process.
- Empirical Implementation and Validation: Following the proposed guidelines, the study generates GML data integrating semantic and attribute information. This approach ensures data quality and reliability. The case study demonstrates the construction of digital twin data that incorporates semantic and attribute information, showcasing its applicability for both public and private sectors. This phase enhances the reusability and interoperability of digital twin data.
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ivanov, S.; Nikolskaya, K.; Radchenko, G.; Sokolinsky, L.; Zymbler, M. Digital twin of city: concept overview. In Global Smart Industry Conference (GloSIC), Chelyabinsk, Russia, 17–19 November.
- Nam, T.; Pardo, T.A. Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In Proceedings of the 12th annual int. digital government research conference: Digital government innovation in challenging times, College Park, MD, USA, 12–15 June 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Glaessgen, E.; Stargel, D. The digital twin paradigm for future NASA and U. In S. Air Force Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 53rd. AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference; 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Jeong, D.; Park, J.; Seo, J.; Shin, W.; Jang, H. The progress and prospective advancements of the national digital twin pilot project. J. Korean Soc. Geospat. Inf. Sci. 2024, 32, 51–63. [Google Scholar]
- Jeong, D.; Lee, C.; Choi, Y.; Jeong, T. Building digital twin data model based on public data. Buildings 2024, 14, 2911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MOLIT. 2021 National spatial information standardization research; Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport Research report: Sejong, Republic of Korea, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- KSX6807:2022; Geographic information—National digital twin—Reference model. Korean Industrial Standards (KS): Eumseong-gun, Republic of Korea, 2022.
- KSX6808-1:2022; Geographic information—National digital twin building—Part1: Data model. Korean Industrial Standards (KS): Eumseong-gun, Republic of Korea, 2022.
- KSX6808-2:2022; Geographic information—National digital twin building—Part2: Data quality. Korean Industrial Standards (KS): Eumseong-gun, Republic of Korea, 2022.
- KSX6808-3:2022; Geographic information—National digital twin building—Part3: Metadata. Korean Industrial Standards (KS): Eumseong-gun, Republic of Korea, 2022.
- KSX6808-4:2022; Geographic information—National digital twin building—Part4: Data product specification. Korean Industrial Standards (KS): Eumseong-gun, Republic of Korea, 2022.
- Brink, L.; Stoter, J.; Zlatanova, S. UML-based approach to developing a CityGML application domain extension. Trans. GIS 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Lehtola, V.V.; Koeva, M.; Elberink, S.O.; Raposo, P.; Virtanen, J.-P.; Vahdatikhaki, F.; Borsci, S. Digital twin of a city: Review of technology serving city needs. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2022, 114, 102915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rossknecht, M.; Airaksinen, E. Concept and evaluation of heating demand prediction based on 3D city models and the citygml energy ADE—Case study helsinki. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9, 602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Breunig, M.; Schilberg, B.; Thomsen, A.; Kuper, P.V.; Jahn, M.; Butwilowski, E. Db4geo, a 3D/4D geodatabase and its application for the analysis of landslides. Lect. Notes Geoinf. Cartogr. 2010, 83–101. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, S.; Zhang, W.; Wong, N.H.; Ignatius, M. Combining citygml files and data-driven models for microclimate simulations in a tropical city. Build. Environ. 2020, 185, 107314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nys, G.-A.; Poux, F.; Billen, R. CityJSON Building Generation from Airborne LiDAR 3D Point Clouds. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brasebin, M.; Perret, J.; Mustière, S.; Weber, C. 3D urban data to assess local urban regulation influence. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2018, 68, 37–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, K.; Lu, W.; Xue, F.; Tang, P.; Li, L.H. Automatic building information model reconstruction in high-density urban areas: Augmenting multi-source data with architectural knowledge. Automat. Constr. 2018, 93, 22–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olfat, H.; Atazadeh, B.; Shojaei, D.; Rajabifard, A. The feasibility of a BIM-driven approach to support building subdivision workflows—Case study of victoria, Australia. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2019, 8, 499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, J.; Mi, S.; Olsson, P.-O.; Paulsson, J.; Harrie, L. Utilizing BIM and GIS for representation and visualization of 3D cadastre. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2019, 8, 503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MOLIT. Revised plan for the Operation of the National Digital Twin Platform; Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport Research report: Sejong, Republic of Korea, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Tan, Y.; Liang, Y.; Zhu, J. CityGML in the integration of BIM and the GIS: Challenges and opportunities. Buildings 2023, 13, 1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benhamu, M.; Doytsher, Y. Toward a spatial 3D cadastre in Israel. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2003, 27, 359–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- OGC 12-019; OGC City Geography Markup Language (CityGML) Encoding Standard Version 2. 0. Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC): Arlington, TX, USA, 2012.
- OGC 20-010; OGC City Geography Markup Language (CityGML) Part 1: Conceptual Model Standard. Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC): Arlington, TX, USA, 2021.
- OGC 21-006r2; OGC City Geography Markup Language (CityGML) Part 2: GML Encoding Standard. Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC): Arlington, TX, USA, 2023.
- Carter, M.P. Computer graphics: Principles and practice. Color Res. Appl. 1997, 22, 65–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mignard, C.; Nicolle, C. Merging BIM and GIS using ontologies application to urban facility management in ACTIVe3D. Comput. Ind. 2014, 65, 1276–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, Y.C.; Cheng, J.C.P.; Anumba, C. Mapping between BIM and 3D GIS in different levels of detail using schema mediation and instance comparison. Automat. Constr. 2016, 67, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, B.; Jeong, D.; Oh, S.; Ahn, J.; Hong, S. Design and implementation of data model for detailed 3D road data. J. Korean Soc. Geospat. Inf. Sci. 2019, 27, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kutzner, T.; Chaturvedi, K.; Kolbe, T. CityGML 3.0: New functions open up new applications. PFG – J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Geoinf. Sci. 2020, 88, 43–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dani, A.A.H.; Supangkat, S.H.; Lubis, F.F.; Nugraha, I.G.B.B.; Kinanda, R.; Rizkia, I. Development of a smart city platform based on digital twin technology for monitoring and supporting decision-making. Sustainability 2023, 15, 14002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lei, B.; Liang, X.; Biljecki, F. Integrating human perception in 3D city models and urban digital twins. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. 2024. [Google Scholar]
- MLIT. Technical report for development of 3D city models in LoD 3; Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism PLATEAU Technical report: Japan, 2021. [Google Scholar]



















| Local government | Theme/Content |
|---|---|
| Local government A | The digital land ‘Treasure Island’ that we want to rediscover |
| Local government B | Establishment of a land development permit support system |
| Local government C | Establishment of a Digital Twin National Infrastructure-Based ‘Regional Development G-Metaverse’ |
| Local government D | Establishment of the DT Osiria Tourist digital twin platform |
| Local government E | Building a digital twin future city for innovation cities |
| Key issues | Details |
|---|---|
| Issues with applying LoD by CityGML version |
|
| Building shape errors and data completeness issues |
|
| GML data thematic accuracy issue |
|
| Data quality verification issue |
|
| Division | CityGML 2.0 | CityGML 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| LoD 0 |
|
|
| LoD 1 |
|
|
| LoD 2 |
|
|
| LoD 3 |
|
|
| LoD 4 |
|
- |
| Types of terrain features | CityGML 2.0 | CityGML 3.0 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LoD 0 | LoD 1 | LoD 2 | LoD 3 | LoD 0 | LoD 1 | LoD 2 | LoD 3 | ||
| Building | Building | M | M | M | M | M | M | M | M |
| BuildingPart | M | M | O | O | M | M | |||
| BuildingInstallation | M | O | O | O | M | ||||
| GroundSurface | M | M | O | O | M | M | |||
| WallSurface | M | M | O | O | M | M | |||
| RoofSurface | M | M | O | M | M | ||||
| OuterFloorSurface | O | O | O | O | |||||
| OuterCellingSurface | M | O | O | M | |||||
| Opening | Door | M | O | O | O | O | |||
| Window | M | O | O | O | O | ||||
| DoorSurface | O | O | M | M | |||||
| WindowSurface | O | O | M | M | |||||
| ClosureSurface | O | O | O | O | O | ||||
| Properties | Definition | Value type |
|---|---|---|
| core:: lod0MultiSurface |
|
gml::multiSurface |
| core:: lod1Solid |
|
gml::solid |
| core:: lod2Solid |
|
gml::solid |
| core:: lod3Solid |
|
gml::solid |
| construction:: boundary |
|
core:: abstractThematicSurface |
| Name | Construction or not | Geometry type | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MultiCurve | MultiSurface | Solid | ||
| Building | ■ | - | □ | □ |
| BuildingPart | ■ | - | □ | □ |
| BuildingInstallation | ■ | - | □ | □ |
| GroundSurface | ■ | - | □ | - |
| WallSurface | ■ | □ | □ | - |
| RoofSurface | ■ | - | □ | - |
| OuterFloorSurface | ■ | - | □ | - |
| OuterCellingSurface | □ | - | □ | - |
| Door | □ | - | □ | □ |
| Window | □ | - | □ | □ |
| DoorSurface | ■ | □ | □ | - |
| WindowSurface | ■ | □ | □ | - |
| ClosureSurface | □ | □ | □ | - |
| Type | Reference image | Type | Reference image |
|---|---|---|---|
| Balcony | ![]() |
External corridor |
![]() |
| Entrance hall |
![]() |
External staircase |
![]() |
| External railing |
![]() |
External installed roof |
![]() |
| Ventilation opening |
![]() |
Solar panels |
![]() |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).









