Submitted:
18 December 2024
Posted:
19 December 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Most existing studies primarily examine the relationship between urban parks and individuals’ perceived restoration, with limited focus on the role of place attachment formed through interactions with urban parks. This research investigates the role of place attachment in the relationship between urban parks and young adults' perceived restoration. Using Zhongshan Park in Xiamen, China, as a case study, 312 valid questionnaires were collected and analyzed through a Structural Equation Model (SEM). The findings reveal that urban parks—categorized as natural elements, perceptual elements, rest elements, and activity elements—have a direct and significant positive influence on young adults' perceived restoration, with activity elements exhibiting the strongest effect. Additionally, most urban park elements significantly and positively impact place attachment, defined by place dependence and place identity. However, perceptual elements did not significantly influence place dependence, and rest elements did not significantly impact place identity. Notably, the study revealed that young adults' perceived restoration in urban parks can be indirectly influenced through two distinct pathways: place dependence and place identity. These insights provide a theoretical foundation for urban planners to design restorative parks effectively.
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Background and Hypothesis
2.1. Urban Parks and the Perceived Restoration of Young Adults'
2.2. Place Attachment, Urban Parks, and Young Adults’ Perceived Restoration
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. The Study Area
3.2. Questionnaire Design, Data Collection and Analysis Methods
3.2.1. Questionnaire Design
3.2.2. Data Collection and Analysis Methods
- 1)
- Data collection
- 2)
- Data analysis methods
4. Results
4.1. Basic Characteristics of the Sample
4.2. Reliability and Validity Analysis
4.3. Hypothesis Model Analysis
5. Discussion
5.1. The Influence of Urban Park on Young Adults’ Perceived Restoration
5.2. Place Attachment as a Mediator of Urban Parks' Impact on Young Adults' Perceived Restoration
5.3. Limitations of the Study
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kaczynski, A.T.; Potwarka, L.R.; Smale, B.J.A.; Havitz, M.E. Association of Parkland Proximity with Neighborhood and Park-Based Physical Activity: Variations by Gender and Age. Leisure Sciences 2009, 31, 174–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giles-Corti, B.; Broomhall, M.H.; Knuiman, M.; Collins, C.; Douglas, K.; Ng, K.; Lange, A.; Donovan, R.J. Increasing Walking: How Important Is Distance to, Attractiveness, and Size of Public Open Space? American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2005, 28, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kumar, M.; Saini, A. ; KironJeet Sustaining Mental Health amidst High-Pressure Job Scenarios: A Narrative Review. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health 2024, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, G.; Pellegrini, P.; Ma, J.; Shi, L. Investigating the Influence of Elements in Pocket Parks on the Psychological Restoration of Young People: A Study from Guiyang and Chongqing in Southwest China. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering 0, 1–13. [CrossRef]
- Yang, T.; Rockett, I.R.H.; Lv, Q.; Cottrell, R.R. Stress Status and Related Characteristics among Urban Residents: A Six-Province Capital Cities Study in China. PLOS ONE 2012, 7, e30521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, Z.; Wang, J.; Liu, X. Attention and Emotion Recovery Effects of Urban Parks during COVID-19—Psychological Symptoms as Moderators. Forests 2022, 13, 2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaplan, S. The Restorative Benefits of Nature: Toward an Integrative Framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology 1995, 15, 169–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaplan, S.; Bardwell, L.V.; Slakter, D.B. The Museum as a Restorative Environment. Environment and Behavior 1993, 25, 725–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Rodiek, S.; Wu, C.; Chen, Y.; Li, Y. Stress Recovery and Restorative Effects of Viewing Different Urban Park Scenes in Shanghai, China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2016, 15, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hartig, T.; Korpela, K.; Evans, G.W. & G. Validation of a Measure of Perceived Environmental Restorativeness.; Department of Psychology, Göteborg University: Göteborg, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Park, S.H.; Lee, P.J.; Jung, T.; Swenson, A. Effects of the Aural and Visual Experience on Psycho-Physiological Recovery in Urban and Rural Environments. Applied Acoustics 2020, 169, 107486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bao, Y.; Gao, M.; Zhao, C.; Zhou, X. White Spaces Unveiled: Investigating the Restorative Potential of Environmentally Perceived Characteristics in Urban Parks during Winter. Forests 2023, 14, 2329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uebel, K.; Marselle, M.; Dean, A.J.; Rhodes, J.R.; Bonn, A. Urban Green Space Soundscapes and Their Perceived Restorativeness. People and Nature 2021, 3, 756–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, H.; Li, X.; Yang, T.; Tan, S. Research on the Relationship between the Environmental Characteristics of Pocket Parks and Young People’s Perception of the Restorative Effects—A Case Study Based on Chongqing City, China. Sustainability 2023, 15, 3943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scannell, L.; Gifford, R. Defining Place Attachment: A Tripartite Organizing Framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2010, 30, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plunkett, D.; Fulthorp, K.; Paris, C.M. Examining the Relationship between Place Attachment and Behavioral Loyalty in an Urban Park Setting. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism 2019, 25, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Korpela, K.M.; Hartig, T.; Kaiser, F.G.; Fuhrer, U. Restorative Experience and Self-Regulation in Favorite Places. Environment and Behavior 2001, 33, 572–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nursyamsiah, R.A.; Setiawan, R.P. Does Place Attachment Act as a Mediating Variable That Affects Revisit Intention toward a Revitalized Park? Alexandria Engineering Journal 2023, 64, 999–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, D.R.; Vaske, J.J. The Measurement of Place Attachment: Validity and Generalizability of a Psychometric Approach. Forest Science 2003, 49, 830–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, S.; Shi, J.; Lu, T.; Furuya, K. Sit down and Rest: Use of Virtual Reality to Evaluate Preferences and Mental Restoration in Urban Park Pavilions. Landscape and Urban Planning 2022, 220, 104336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, P.-J.; Ho, L.-C.; Suppakittpaisarn, P. Investigating the Interplay between Senior-Friendly Park Features, Perceived Greenness, Restorativeness, and Well-Being in Older Adults. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2024, 94, 128273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.; Liu, Y. The Influence of Visual and Auditory Environments in Parks on Visitors’ Landscape Preference, Emotional State, and Perceived Restorativeness. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 2024, 11, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, L.; Sun, Y.; Beckmann-Wübbelt, A.; Saha, S. Characteristics of Urban Park Recreation and Health during Early COVID-19 by on-Site Survey in Beijing. npj Urban Sustain 2023, 3, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Deng, L.; Li, X.; Luo, H.; Fu, E.-K.; Ma, J.; Sun, L.-X.; Huang, Z.; Cai, S.-Z.; Jia, Y. Empirical Study of Landscape Types, Landscape Elements and Landscape Components of the Urban Park Promoting Physiological and Psychological Restoration. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2020, 48, 126488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Zhang, X.; Jia, T. Humanization of Nature: Testing the Influences of Urban Park Characteristics and Psychological Factors on Collegers’ Perceived Restoration. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2023, 79, 127806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yigitcanlar, T.; Kamruzzaman, Md.; Teimouri, R.; Degirmenci, K.; Alanjagh, F.A. Association between Park Visits and Mental Health in a Developing Country Context: The Case of Tabriz, Iran. Landscape and Urban Planning 2020, 199, 103805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rapuano, M.; Ruotolo, F.; Ruggiero, G.; Masullo, M.; Maffei, L.; Galderisi, A.; Palmieri, A.; Iachini, T. Spaces for Relaxing, Spaces for Recharging: How Parks Affect People’s Emotions. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2022, 81, 101809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, C.; Zhang, Y. Public Emotions and Visual Perception of the East Coast Park in Singapore: A Deep Learning Method Using Social Media Data. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2024, 94, 128285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, C.; Shi, S.; Runeson, G. Developing Place Attachment in Master-Planned Residential Estates in Sydney: The Influence of Neighbourhood Parks. Buildings 2023, 13, 3080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bazrafshan, M.; Spielhofer, R.; Wissen Hayek, U.; Kienast, F.; Grêt-Regamey, A. Greater Place Attachment to Urban Parks Enhances Relaxation: Examining Affective and Cognitive Responses of Locals and Bi-Cultural Migrants to Virtual Park Visits. Landscape and Urban Planning 2023, 232, 104650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nwankwo, M.; Meng, Q.; Yang, D.; Liu, F. Effects of Forest on Birdsong and Human Acoustic Perception in Urban Parks: A Case Study in Nigeria. Forests 2022, 13, 994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dzhambov, A.; Hartig, T.; Markevych, I.; Tilov, B.; Dimitrova, D. Urban Residential Greenspace and Mental Health in Youth: Different Approaches to Testing Multiple Pathways Yield Different Conclusions. Environmental Research 2018, 160, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yakınlar, N.; Akpınar, A. How Perceived Sensory Dimensions of Urban Green Spaces Are Associated with Adults’ Perceived Restoration, Stress, and Mental Health? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2022, 72, 127572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bazrafshan, M.; Tabrizi, A.M.; Bauer, N.; Kienast, F. Place Attachment through Interaction with Urban Parks: A Cross-Cultural Study. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2021, 61, 127103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, M.; Dong, S.; Wu, H.C.; Li, Y.; Su, T.; Xia, B.; Zheng, J.; Guo, X. Key Impact Factors of Visitors’ Environmentally Responsible Behaviour: Personality Traits or Interpretive Services? A Case Study of Beijing’s Yuyuantan Urban Park, China. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research 2018, 23, 792–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Q.Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, Y.J.; Huang, Q.T.; Lan, S.R. Tourists’ environmental preferences, perceived restoration and perceived health at Fuzhou National Forest Park. Resources Science 2018, 40, 381–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E. Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective; Pearson Education, 2010; ISBN 978-0-13-515309-3.
- Wilkie, S.; Clements, H. Further Exploration of Environment Preference and Environment Type Congruence on Restoration and Perceived Restoration Potential. Landscape and Urban Planning 2018, 170, 314–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, B.; Wang, L.; Huang, S. (Sam); Xiong, Q. Impact of Perceived Environmental Restorativeness on Tourists’ pro-Environmental Behavior: Examining the Mediation of Place Attachment and the Moderation of Ecocentrism. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management 2023, 56, 398–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, H.Y.; Tan, S.H. Study on the Influencing Mechanism of Restoration Effect of Urban Park Environment: A Case Study of Chongqing. Chinese Landscape Architecture 2018, 34, 5–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peschardt, K.K.; Stigsdotter, U.K. Associations between Park Characteristics and Perceived Restorativeness of Small Public Urban Green Spaces. Landscape and Urban Planning 2013, 112, 26–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diette, G.B.; Lechtzin, N.; Haponik, E.; Devrotes, A.; Rubin, H.R. Distraction Therapy With Nature Sights and Sounds Reduces Pain During Flexible Bronchoscopya. Chest 2003, 123, 941–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maas, J.; Verheij, R.A.; Groenewegen, P.P.; Vries, S. de; Spreeuwenberg, P. Green Space, Urbanity, and Health: How Strong Is the Relation? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2006, 60, 587–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Perry, E.E.; Xiao, X.; Nettles, J.M.; Iretskaia, T.A.; Manning, R.E. Park Visitors’ Place Attachment and Climate Change-Related Displacement: Potential Shifts in Who, Where, and When. Environmental Management 2021, 68, 73–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sancho-Pivoto, A.; Raimundo, S.; de Oliveira Santos, G.E. Contributions of Visitation in Parks to Health and Wellness: A Comparative Study between Natural and Urban Parks in Brazil. Tourism Planning & Development, 2024; 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, B.; Olds, T.; Curtis, R.; Dumuid, D.; Virgara, R.; Watson, A.; Szeto, K.; O’Connor, E.; Ferguson, T.; Eglitis, E.; et al. Effectiveness of Physical Activity Interventions for Improving Depression, Anxiety and Distress: An Overview of Systematic Reviews. Br J Sports Med 2023, 57, 1203–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hallal, P.C.; Lee, I.-M.; Sarmiento, O.L.; Powell, K.E. The Future of Physical Activity: From Sick Individuals to Healthy Populations. Int J Epidemiol 2024, 53, dyae129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maricchiolo, F.; Mosca, O.; Paolini, D.; Fornara, F. The Mediating Role of Place Attachment Dimensions in the Relationship Between Local Social Identity and Well-Being. Front Psychol 2021, 12, 645648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dasgupta, R.; Basu, M.; Hashimoto, S.; Estoque, R.C.; Kumar, P.; Johnson, B.A.; Mitra, B.K.; Mitra, P. Residents’ Place Attachment to Urban Green Spaces in Greater Tokyo Region: An Empirical Assessment of Dimensionality and Influencing Socio-Demographic Factors. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2022, 67, 127438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]




| Variable | Observation Metrics | Standard$Factor Loading | KMO | AVE | CR | Cronbach's$α | |
| A$urban park | Natural elements | A1The plant species are abundant | 0.85 | 0.838 | 0.676 | 0.892 | 0.892 |
| A2There are many arbors and shrubs | 0.73 | ||||||
| A3-The lawn area is large | 0.88 | ||||||
| A4The water landscape is beautiful | 0.82 | ||||||
| Perceptual elements | A5The space is private | 0.62 | 0.770 | 0.512 | 0.806 | 0.804 | |
| A6The atmosphere of the space is quiet | 0.75 | ||||||
| A7The space is secure | 0.79 | ||||||
| A8The landscape is attractive | 0.69 | ||||||
| Rest elements | A9There are plenty of rest facilities | 0.77 | 0.721 | 0.641 | 0.842 | 0.841 | |
| A10Rest facilities are comfortable | 0.84 | ||||||
| A11The orientation of the rest facility can see beautiful landscape | 0.79 | ||||||
| Activity elements | A12The number of event venues is sufficient | 0.71 | 0.707 | 0.617 | 0.828 | 0.823 | |
| A13There are many types of sports facilities | 0.85 | ||||||
| A14The number of sports facilities is sufficient | 0.79 | ||||||
| B$place attachment | Place$dependence | B1This park is the best place for me to relax | 0.83 | 0.899 | 0.655 | 0.904 | 0.903 |
| B2This park is more beautiful than other parks | 0.83 | ||||||
| B3It's more satisfying to have an leisure activity in this park than in other parks | 0.85 | ||||||
| B4While leisure activities can be done in other parks, this one is more suitable | 0.85 | ||||||
| B5No other place can compare to this place. | 0.67 | ||||||
| Place identity | B6Feeling like this park has become a part of my life | 0.75 | 0.864 | 0.543 | 0.855 | 0.856 | |
| B7Having a lot of precious memories | 0.65 | ||||||
| B8I identity strongly with visiting in this park. | 0.83 | ||||||
| B9 Being attached to this park | 0.74 | ||||||
| B10The experience in the park enriched my understanding of myself | 0.70 | ||||||
| C$perceived restoration | Perceived restoration | C1Feeling Fatigue is reduced | 0.83 | 0.888 | 0.647 | 0.901 | 0.898 |
| C2Feeling energized | 0.82 | ||||||
| C3Feel clam | 0.86 | ||||||
| C4Feeling awake and rested enough | 0.85 | ||||||
| C5Feeling relaxed | 0.64 |
| Hypothesis | Direction | P | Standardization regression coefficient | S.E. | C.R. | Conclusion |
| H1a1 | Natural→Pr | 0.001 | 0.20 | 0.063 | 3.270 | Support |
| H1a2 | Perceptual→Pr | 0.004 | 0.16 | 0.079 | 2.891 | Support |
| H1a3 | Resting→Pr | *** | 0.15 | 0.066 | 3.408 | Support |
| H1a4 | Activity→Pr | 0.005 | 0.24 | 0.080 | 2.825 | Support |
| H2a1 | Natural→PD | *** | 0.44 | 0.067 | 6.886 | Support |
| H2a2 | Natural→PI | *** | 0.42 | 0.053 | 6.407 | Support |
| H2a3 | Perceptual→PD | 0.280 | 0.09 | 0.098 | 1.081 | UnSupport |
| H2a4 | Perceptual→PI | 0.006 | 0.16 | 0.077 | 2.773 | Support |
| H2a5 | Rest→PD | 0.005 | 0.17 | 0.084 | 2.831 | Support |
| H2a6 | Rest→PI | 0.219 | 0.05H | 0.063 | 1.229 | UnSupport |
| H2a7 | Activity→PD | 0.001 | 0.17 | 0.091 | 3.286 | Support |
| H2a8 | Activity→PI | *** | 0.28 | 0.078 | 5.195 | Support |
| H2a9 | PD→Pr | *** | 0.20 | 0.054 | 3.475 | Support |
| H2a10 | PI→Pr | 0.009 | 0.18 | 0.083 | 2.620 | Support |
| Hypothesis | Direction | P | Direct effects | Indirect effects | Total effects |
| H1a1 | Natural→Pr | 0.001 | 0.196 | 0.166 | 0.362 |
| H1a2 | Perceptual→Pr | 0.004 | 0.162 | 0.056 | 0.217 |
| H1a3 | Rest→Pr | *** | 0.150 | 0.038 | 0.187 |
| H1a4 | Activity→Pr | 0.005 | 0.242 | 0.085 | 0.327 |
| H2a1 | Natural→PD | *** | 0.445 | 0.000 | 0.445 |
| H2a2 | Natural→PI | *** | 0.419 | 0.000 | 0.419 |
| H2a3 | Perceptual→PD | 0.280 | 0.092 | 0.000 | 0.092 |
| H2a4 | Perceptual→PI | 0.006 | 0.205 | 0.000 | 0.205 |
| H2a5 | Rest→PD | 0.005 | 0.140 | 0.000 | 0.140 |
| H2a6 | Rest→PI | 0.219 | 0.051 | 0.000 | 0.051 |
| H2a7 | Activity→PD | 0.001 | 0.173 | 0.000 | 0.173 |
| H2a8 | Activity→PI | *** | 0.276 | 0.000 | 0.276 |
| H2a9 | PD→Pr | *** | 0.203 | 0.000 | 0.203 |
| H2a10 | PI→Pr | 0.009 | 0.180 | 0.000 | 0.180 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).