Submitted:
12 December 2024
Posted:
13 December 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Material and Experiment
2.1. Material Used
2.2. Straw Fiber Pretreatment
2.3. Specimen
2.4. Experimental Device and Method
3. Results and Discussions
3.1. Workability
3.2. Mechanical Properties
3.3. Dry Density
4. Cost of WCSFCC High-Pressure Brick
5. Application Field of WCSFCC
6. Conclusions and Outlook
- The findings showed that the cement grade and the straw ashes influenced the workability of WCSFCC. Excess water influences the condensation and hardening time of the mixture in the flowability tests. Therefore, low w/c is recommended to manufacture the WCSFCC high-pressure brick competently.
- Adding straw ash to the straw fiber cementitious mixture improved the compressive strength from 11.48 MPa to 19 MPa at 28 days of age, while the flexural strength of WCSFCC was raised to 7.0 times at 28 days. Meanwhile, exploring the influence of the dosage of straw ashes on the experimental results, we found that 3 wt% straw ash meets design requirements.
- The dry density of the mixtures using straw ash is higher than that of straw powder due to the reduction of the porosity rate. However, increasing the straw ash dosage decreased the dry density of the mixtures. The dosing of straw ash changes and optimizes the WCSFCC structure, making the samples lighter and lower density.
- Using straw fiber cementitious high-pressure brick masonry is more economical. Specifically, the lower costs of wheat straw and corn straw, treatment lower cost, and labor costs. In addition, from the perspective of sustainable development, it is more beneficial to the environment and health.
- It is recommended that the WCSFCC high-pressure brick with straw powder be used for non-load-bearing walls as thermal insulation material, and the WCSFCC high-pressure brick with straw ashes should be used for load-bearing walls.
Acknowledgments
References
- Amiri, A.; Ottelin, J.; Sorvari, J. Are LEED-certified buildings energy-efficient in practice? Sustainability 2019, 11, 1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pombo, O.; Rivela, B.; Neila, J. The challenge of sustainable building renovation: assessment of current criteria and future outlook. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 123, 88–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Memon, M.J.; Jhatial, A.A.; Rid, Z.A.; Rind, T.A.; Sandhu, A.R. Marble Powder as Fine Aggregates in Concrete. Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res. 2019, 9, 4105–4107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bheel, N.; Ibrahim, M.H.W.; Adesina, A.; Kennedy, C.; Shar, I.A. Mechanical performance of concrete incorporating wheat straw ash as partial replacement of cement. J. Build. Pathol. Rehabil. 2020, 6, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Danish, M.S.S.; Senjyu, T.; Ibrahimi, A. M.; Ahmadi, M.; Howlader, A.M. A managed framework for energy-efficient building. J. Build. Eng. 2019, 21, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shad, R.; Khorrami, M.; Ghaemi, M. Developing an Iranian green building assessment tool using decision making methods and geographical information system: case study in Mashhad city. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 67, 324–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asif, M. Growth and sustainability trends in the buildings sector in the GCC region with particular reference to the KSA and UAE, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 55, 1267–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yun, K.K.; Hossain, M.S.; Han, S.; Seunghak, C. Rheological, mechanical properties, and statistical significance analysis of shotcrete with various natural fibers and mixing ratios. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2022, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niu, B.; Kim, B.H. Method for Manufacturing Corn Straw Cement-Based Composite and Its Physical Properties. Materials, 2022, 15, 3199.
- Katman, H.Y.B.; Khai, W.J.; Bheel, N.; Kırgız, M.S.; Kumar, A.; Khatib, J.; Benjeddou, O. Workability, Strength, Modulus of Elasticity, and Permeability Feature of Wheat Straw Ash-Incorporated Hydraulic Cement Concrete. Buildings 2022, 12, 1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azzem, L.S.; Bellel, N. Thermal and Physico-Chemical Characteristics of Plaster Reinforced with Wheat Straw for Use as Insulating Materials in Building. Buildings 2022, 12, 1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, J.; Zhao, Z.; Zhang, J.; Wang, J.; Guo, S.; Sun, J. Study on the hygrothermal properties of a Chinese solar greenhouse with a straw block north wall. Energy Build. 2019, 193, 127–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, P.; Liu, C.Q.; Chang, J.; Yin, Q.Q.; Huang, W.W.; Liu, Y.; Dang, X.W.; Gao, T.Z.; Lu, F.S. Effect of physicochemical pretreatments plus enzymatic hydrolysis on the composition and morphologic structure of corn straw. Renew. Energy, 2019, 138: 502–508.
- Xie, X.L.; Gou, G.J.; Wei, X.; Zhou, Z.W.; Jiang, M.; Xu, X.L.; Wang, Z.Y.; Hui, D. Influence of pretreatment of rice straw of straw fiber filled cement based composites. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 113, 449–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bederina, M.; Belhadj, B.; Ammari, M.S.; Gouilleux, A.; Makhloufi, Z.; Montrelay, N.; Quéneudéc, M. Improvement of the properties of a sand concrete containing barley straws treatment of the barley straws. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 115, 464–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maglad, A.M.; Amin, M.; Zeyad, A.M.; Tayeh, B.A.; Agwa, I.S. Engineering Properties of Ultra-High Strength Concrete Containing Sugarcane Bagasse and Corn Stalk Ashes. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2023, 23, 3196–3218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shang, X.Y.; Song, S.Q.; Yang, J.W. Comparative Environmental Evaluation of Straw Resources by LCA in China. Adv. Mat. Sc. Eng. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- National Standard of the People's Republic of China. Chemical reagent - Preparations of reference titration solutions GB/T601-2016, GB601-2016. Beijing, People's Republic of China, 2017.
- Coronado, M.; Montero, G.; Garcia, C.; Torres, R.; Vazquez, A.R.; Ayala, J.; Leon Perez, L.; Romero, E. Cotton stalks for power generation in Baja California, Mexico by SWOT analysis methodology. Energy Sustain. 2015, 195, 75–86.
- Korjenic, A.; Zach, J.; Hroudová, J. The use of insulating materials based on natural fibers in combination with plant facades in building constructions. Energy Build. 2016, 116, 45–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ASTM C1437-07. Standard Test Method for Flow of Hydraulic Cement Mortar; ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2009.18.
- National Standard of the People's Republic of China. Standard for test methods of concrete physical and mechanical properties, GB/T 50081–2019. Beijing, China: Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China, 2019.
- Khan, M.S.; Ali, F.; Zaib, M.A. A Study of Properties of Wheat Straw Ash as a Partial Cement Replacement in the Production of Green Concrete. J. Sc. Technol. 2019, 3, 61–68. [Google Scholar]
- Li, H.J.; Zhou, Y.; Xin, W.L.; Wei, Y.Q.; Zhang, J.L.; Guo, L.L. Wheat breeding in northern China: Achievements and technical advances. The Crop Journal, 2019, 7, 718-729.
- General Administration of Customs of the People's Republic of China. Customs Statistics http://www.customs.gov.cn/.
- Luo, N.; Meng, Q.F.; Feng, P.Y.; Qu, Z.R.; Yu, Y.H.; Liu, D.L.; Müller, C.; Wang, P. China can be self-sufficient in maize production by 2030 with optimal crop management. Nature Communications, 2023, 14, 1-11.
- ASTM C90-16a. Standard Specification for Loadbearing Concrete Masonry Units. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017.
- National Standard of the People's Republic of China.General code for masonry structures, GB55007-2021. Beijing, China: Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China, 2021.




| Variable | Mixture | Flow value (mm) | Standard deviation (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Straw fiber | Ord1-Wheat | 120 | ± 0.77 |
| Ord1-Corn | 114 | ± 0.6 | |
| Ord1-Wheat+Corn | 122 | ± 0.64 | |
| Cement grade | W-Wheat+Corn | 118 | ± 0.003 |
| Ord1-Wheat+Corn | 122 | ± 0.64 | |
| Ord2-Wheat+Corn | 119 | ± 0.33 | |
| Straw ash | W-B-3-Wheat+Corn | 121 | ± 0.18 |
| Ord1-B-Wheat+Corn | 124 | ± 0.28 | |
| Ord2-B-Wheat+Corn | 122 | ± 0.64 | |
| Ash dosage | W-B-3-Wheat+Corn | 121 | ± 0.18 |
| W-B-4-Wheat+Corn | 116 | ± 0.65 | |
| W-B-5-Wheat+Corn | 117 | ± 0.35 | |
| Raw Materials | Specific surface area (m2/g) | ||
| Wheat fiber | 0.853 | ||
| Wheat powder | 0.981 | ||
| Wheat ash | 3.566 | ||
| Corn fiber | 0.784 | ||
| Corn powder | 0.942 | ||
| Corn ash | 9.088 | ||
| White Cement PW-52.5 | 1.067 | ||
| Ordinary Portland PO-42.5 | 0.942 | ||
| Ordinary Portland PO-52.5 | 2.149 | ||
| Variable | Specimen | Flexural strength Size (mm) |
Compression strength Size (mm) |
Age | Dry density | Flexural strength (MPa) |
Compression strength (MPa) |
| Straw fiber | Ord1-Wheat (14D) | 40-40-160 | 40-40-40 | 14 Days |
1055.9 | 0.38 | 3.85 |
| Ord1-Corn (14D) | 40-40-160 | 40-40-40 | 1068.9 | 0.41 | 4.34 | ||
| Ord1-Wheat+Corn (14D) | 40-40-160 | 40-40-40 | 1128.6 | 0.31 | 2.69 | ||
| Ord1-Wheat (21D) | 40-40-160 | 40-40-40 | 21 Days |
1075.0 | 0.58 | 4.15 | |
| Ord1-Corn (21D) | 40-40-160 | 40-40-40 | 1088.0 | 0.76 | 4.71 | ||
| Ord1-Wheat+Corn (21D) | 40-40-160 | 40-40-40 | 1170.2 | 0.46 | 2.72 | ||
| Ord1-Wheat (28D) | 40-40-160 | 40-40-40 | 28 Days |
1055.9 | 0.65 | 4.55 | |
| Ord1-Corn (28D) | 40-40-160 | 40-40-40 | 1159.2 | 0.78 | 4.98 | ||
| Ord1-Wheat+Corn (28D) | 40-40-160 | 40-40-40 | 1171.5 | 0.68 | 2.85 | ||
| Cement grade | W-Wheat+Corn (14D) | 40-40-160 | 40-40-40 | 14 Days |
1186.9 | 0.59 | 2.55 |
| Ord1-Wheat+Corn (14D) | 40-40-160 | 40-40-40 | 1128.6 | 0.31 | 2.69 | ||
| Ord2-Wheat+Corn (14D) | 40-40-160 | 40-40-40 | 1211.5 | 0.71 | 3.89 | ||
| W-Wheat+Corn (21D) | 40-40-160 | 40-40-40 | 21 Days |
1217.5 | 0.63 | 3.11 | |
| Ord1-Wheat+Corn (21D) | 40-40-160 | 40-40-40 | 1170.2 | 0.46 | 2.72 | ||
| Ord2-Wheat+Corn (21D) | 40-40-160 | 40-40-40 | 1218.3 | 0.80 | 4.26 | ||
| W-Wheat+Corn (28D) | 40-40-160 | 40-40-40 | 28 Days |
1210.7 | 0.53 | 3.31 | |
| Ord1-Wheat+Corn (28D) | 40-40-160 | 40-40-40 | 1171.5 | 0.68 | 2.85 | ||
| Ord2-Wheat+Corn (28D) | 40-40-160 | 40-40-40 | 1206.8 | 0.82 | 3.79 | ||
| Straw ashes | W-B-Wheat+Corn (14D) | 40-40-160 | 40-40-40 | 14 Days |
1269.7 | 1.82 | 12.25 |
| Ord1-B-Wheat+Corn (14D) | 40-40-160 | 40-40-40 | 1208.7 | 2.88 | 10.91 | ||
| Ord2-B-Wheat+Corn (14D) | 40-40-160 | 40-40-40 | 1282.8 | 3.42 | 11.0 | ||
| W-B-Wheat+Corn (21D) | 40-40-160 | 40-40-40 | 21 Days |
1290.9 | 5.98 | 16.53 | |
| Ord1-B-Wheat+Corn (21D) | 40-40-160 | 40-40-40 | 1241.5 | 3.36 | 11.20 | ||
| Ord2-B-Wheat+Corn (21D) | 40-40-160 | 40-40-40 | 1329.8 | 3.95 | 11.96 | ||
| W-B-Wheat+Corn (28D) | 40-40-160 | 40-40-40 | 28 Days |
1330.7 | 4.91 | 19.0 | |
| Ord1-B-Wheat+Corn (28D) | 40-40-160 | 40-40-40 | 1248.6 | 3.75 | 11.48 | ||
| Ord2-B-Wheat+Corn (28D) | 40-40-160 | 40-40-40 | 1341.9 | 3.07 | 11.87 | ||
| Dosage | W-B-3-Wheat+Corn (14D) | 40-40-160 | 40-40-40 | 14 Days |
1269.7 | 1.82 | 12.25 |
| W-B-4-Wheat+Corn (14D) | 40-40-160 | 40-40-40 | 1323.2 | 3.97 | 13.92 | ||
| W-B-5-Wheat+Corn (14D) | 40-40-160 | 40-40-40 | 1298.8 | 3.41 | 13.4 | ||
| W-B-3-Wheat+Corn (21D) | 40-40-160 | 40-40-40 | 21 Days |
1290.9 | 5.98 | 16.53 | |
| W-B-4-Wheat+Corn (21D) | 40-40-160 | 40-40-40 | 1337.9 | 2.2 | 12.21 | ||
| W-B-5-Wheat+Corn (21D) | 40-40-160 | 40-40-40 | 1306.1 | 4.21 | 13.64 | ||
| W-B-3-Wheat+Corn (28D) | 40-40-160 | 40-40-40 | 28 Days |
1330.7 | 4.91 | 19.0 | |
| W-B-4-Wheat+Corn (28D) | 40-40-160 | 40-40-40 | 1323.2 | 4.31 | 14.275 | ||
| W-B-5-Wheat+Corn (28D) | 40-40-160 | 40-40-40 | 1308.6 | 4.6 | 14.84 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).