Submitted:
19 November 2024
Posted:
20 November 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
- on one level;
- collision-free two-level;
- single-level with a refuge safety island.
2. Materials and Methods
- comparison of the rate of improvement of pedestrian safety (in general and at crossings) before and after the introduction of new regulations—in the context of changes in the general situation on the roads;
- assessment of the impact of infrastructure development, in particular the construction of expressways, on the number of accidents and their consequences in general and among pedestrians;
- assessment of the perception of the new regulations by drivers and pedestrians—with the working hypothesis that drivers have adapted to a greater extent to the privileged position of pedestrians and that the changes were different in metropolitan traffic and different in the countryside;
- as a result of the introduction of pedestrian privileges, due to different reactions of drivers and pedestrians themselves, the ratio of the number of people killed and injured may change—the accident severity index may decrease.
3. Results
3.1. Victims of Road Accidents in Poland from 2001 to 2022
3.2. Accidents at Crossins in the Background of the General Road Situation
3.3. Accidents at Crossroads in Provincial Cities
3.4. Detailed Analysis of Roadtraffic Safety in 2019 and 2022
3.5. Infrastructure Development and Change in Road Traffic Safety
- only the connection of the road network into a logical whole should significantly reduce the number and severity of accidents;
- in the above-mentioned districts there are, of course, also other national, provincial and district roads where traffic may increase due to the possibility of access to the expressway;
- building an expressway in a given district may result in taking over some traffic from other, sometimes quite distant districts, so it is difficult to expect any radical differences.
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Jamroz, K.; Budzyński, M.; Romanowska, A.; Żukowska, J.; Oskarbski, J.; Kustra, W. Experiences and Challenges in Fatality Reduction on Polish Roads. Sustainability. 2019, 11, 959. [CrossRef]
- Jackisch, J.; Sethi, D.; Mitis F.; Szymański, T.; Arra, I. European Facts and Global Status report on road Safety 2015, World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe. 2015. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/326340.
- Zhong, W.; Du, L. Predicting Traffic Casualties Using Support Vector Machines with Heuristic Algorithms: A Study Based on Collision Data of Urban Roads. Sustainability. 2023, 15, 2944. [CrossRef]
- Haghshenas, S.S; Guido, G.; Vitale, A.; Astarita, Vittorio. Assessment of the Level of Road Crash Severity: Comparison of Intelligence Studies. Expert Systems with Applications. 2023, 234, 121118. [CrossRef]
- Guido, G.; Haghshenas, S.S.; Haghshenas, S.S.; Vitale, A.; Gallelli, V.; Astarita, V. Prioritizing the Potential Smartification Measures by Using an Integrated Decision Support System with Sustainable Development Goals (a Case Study in Southern Italy). Safety. 2022, 8, 35. [CrossRef]
- Ustawa z dnia 20 czerwca 1997 r.—Prawo o ruchu drogowym (Dz. U. z 2022 r. poz. 988, z późn. zm.) https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20220000988).
- Zarządzenie nr 635 Komendanta Głównego Policji z dnia 30 czerwca 2006 r. w sprawie metod i form prowadzenia przez Policję statystyki zdarzeń drogowych https://www.infor.pl/akt-prawny/U27.2006.011.0000067,metryka,zarzadzenie-nr-635-komendanta-glownego-policji-w-sprawie-metod-i-form-prowadzenia-przez-policje-statystyki-zdarzen-drogowych.html).
- International Transport Forum, ROAD SAFETY REPORT 2021, POLAND (https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/poland-road-safety.pdf.
- Sobolewski, M. Wskaźnik ciężkości wypadków drogowych w porównaniach międzynarodowych. Logistyka 2015, 3/CD 1, pp. 4506-4511.
- Żukowska, J. Diagnoza stanu bezpieczeństwa transportu w Polsce [w] Zintegrowany System Bezpieczeństwa Transportu: Synteza/ red. Krystek, R. Wydawnictwa Komunikacji i Łączności, Warszawa, 2010, pp. 35-51.
- Szczęsny, P.; Rymarz, J. Korelacja wybranych wskaźników bezpieczeństwa ruchu drogowego na przykładzie Polski i krajów sąsiednich, Mechanika, Wyd. Politechniki Krakowskiej, R. 109, z. 5-M, 2012, pp. 153-162.
- Malin, F.; Silla, A.; Mledenoović, M. Prevalence and factors associated with pedestrian fatalities and serious injuries: Case Finland. European Transport Research Review. 2020, Vol. 12. [CrossRef]
- Luoma, J.; Sivak, M. Why is road safety in the US not on par with Sweden, the UK, and the Netherlands? Lessons to be learned. European Transport Research Review. 2014, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 295–302. [CrossRef]
- Gryzik, R.; Kozłowski, W. Poprawa bezpieczeństwa pieszych poprzez budowę aktywnych przejść dla pieszych. Transport miejski i regionalny. 2019, Vol. 1, pp. 32-35. https://yadda.icm.edu.pl/baztech/element/bwmeta1.element.baztech-3801da12-3006-4816-81bc-c74dd2f6438e.
- Chen, Z.; Chen, X.; Wang, R.; Gao, M. Characterization of Pedestrian Crossing Spatial Violations and Safety Impact Analysis in Advance Right-Turn Lane. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2022, 19, 9134. [CrossRef]
- Jamroz, K.; Gaca, S.; Michalski, L.; Kieć, M.; Budzynski, M.; Gumińska, L.; Kustra, W.; Mackun, T.; Oskarbska, I.; Rychlewska, J.; Ryś, Artur.; Wachnicka, J.; Wierzbicka, J. Ochrona pieszych. Podręcznik dla organizatorów ruchu pieszego. Ministerstwo Infrastruktury i Rozwoju. Sekretariat Krajowej Rady BRD. 2014. [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Deng, W.; Wang, J.; Li, Q.; Wang, Z. Modeling pedestrians’ road crossing behavior in traffic system micro-simulation in China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2006, 40, pp. 280-290. [CrossRef]
- Tomczuk, P.; Wytrykowska, A. Analiza czynników wpływających na bezpieczeństwo pieszego na przejściu dla pieszych typu “zebra” niesterowanym sygnalizacją Analiza świetlną. Logistyka. 2015, No 4, pp. 1082-1083.
- Bazyl, O.; Persia, L. & Usami, D.S., A methodology to assess pedestrian crossing safety. European Transport Research Review. 2010, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 129–137. [CrossRef]
- Elvik, R.; Sørensen, M.W.; Nævestad, T.O. Factors influencing safety in a sample of marked pedestrian crossings selected for safety inspections in the city of Oslo. Accid Anal Prev. 2013, 59, pp. 64-70. [CrossRef]
- Chebanyuk,K.; Prasolenko, O.; Burko, D.; Galkin, A.; Lobashov, O.; Shevchenko, A.; Usami, D.S.; Persia, L. Pedestrians influence on the traffic flow parameters and road safety indicators at the pedestrian crossing, Transportation Research Procedia. 2020, Vol. 45, pp. 858-865. [CrossRef]
- Dorohin, S.; Zelikov, V.; Denisov, G. Improvement of road traffic safety in the zone of unsignalled pedestrian crossings, Transportation Research Procedia. 2018, Vol. 36, pp. 122-128. [CrossRef]
- Marić, B.; Lipovac, K.; Nešić, M.; Đerić, M. The Influence of a Countdown Display On Pedestrian Behavior at a Signalized Pedestrian Crossing Equipped with a Pedestrian Refuge Island. Transportation Research Procedia. 2021, Vol. 55, pp. 1720-1728. [CrossRef]
- Bendak, S.; Alnaqbi, A.; Alzarooni, M.; Aljanaahi, S.; Alsuwaidi, S. Factors affecting pedestrian behaviors at signalized crosswalks: An empirical study. Journal of Safety Research. 2021, 76(8). [CrossRef]
- Budzynski, M.; Gobis, A.; Guminska, L.; Jelinski, L.; Kiec, M.; Tomczuk, P. Assessment of the Influence of Road Infrastructure Parameters on the Behaviour of Drivers and Pedestrians in Pedestrian Crossing Areas. Energies. 2021, 14, 3559. [CrossRef]
- Idzior, M. Analysis of factors influencing pedestrians’ safety in the road traffic. Motor Transport. 2021, 64(2), pp. 24—29. [CrossRef]
- Hualong, Z.; Cunbao, Z.; Feng, C. & Yuan, Y. W., Effects of mobile phone use on pedestrian crossing behavior and safety at unsignalized intersections. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. 2019, Vol. 46, No. 5, pp. 381-388. [CrossRef]
- Dąbrowska-Lorenc, M.; Sicińska, K.; Zielińska, A. Road users’ behaviour study in areas of zebra crosswalks, Transport Problems. 2021, Vol. 16, No. 3, 185-198. [CrossRef]
- Ziółkowski, R., Speed analyses and modeling in pedestrian crossing areas. Transport Problems. 2023,. Vol. 18(2), pp. 111-122. [CrossRef]
- Olszewski, P.; Szagała, P.; Wolański, M.; Zielińska, A. Pedestrian fatality risk in accidents at unsignalized zebra crosswalks in Poland. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2015, Vol. 84, pp. 83-91. [CrossRef]
- Kruszyna, M.; Matczuk-Pisarek, M. The Effectiveness of Selected Devices to Reduce the Speed of Vehicles on Pedestrian Crossings. Sustainability. 2021, 13, 9678. [CrossRef]
- Aghabayk, K.; Esmailpour, J.; Jafari, A.; Shiwakoti, N. Observational-based study to explore pedestrian crossing behaviors at signalized and unsignalized crosswalks. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2021, 151, 105990. [CrossRef]
- Vignali, V.; Pazzini, M.; Ghasemi, N.; Lantieri, C.; Simone, A.; Dondi, G. The safety and conspicuity of pedestrian crossing at roundabouts: The effect of median refuge island and zebra markings. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 2020; Vol. 68; pp. 94-104. [CrossRef]
- Cunbao, Z; Feng, C.; Yuanyuan, W. Evaluation of pedestrian crossing behavior and safety at uncontrolled mid-block crosswalks with different numbers of lanes in China. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2019, Vol. 123, pp. 263-273. [CrossRef]
- Dąbrowska-Lorenc, M.; Sicińska, K. Survey of pedestrians and car drivers’ attitudes at the area of pedestrian crossings over period of time. Transport Problems. 2021, Vol. 16, No. 4. [CrossRef]
- Ragland, D.R.; Grembek, O.; Orrick, P.; Felschundneff, G. Roadway and Infrastructure Design and Its Relation to Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety: Basic Principles, Applications, and Benefits. UC Berkeley: Safe Transportation Research & Education Center; 2013. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9qg3s59b.
- Ahmed, T.; Moeinaddini, M.; Almoshaogeh, M.; Jamal, A.; Nawaz, I.; Alharbi, F. A New Pedestrian Crossing Level of Service. (PCLOS) Method for Promoting Safe Pedestrian Crossing in Urban Areas. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021, 18, 8813. [CrossRef]
- Kęsicka, S.; Wachnicka, J. Analiza wpływu zachowań niechronionych użytkowników dróg na ich poziomie bezpieczeństwa w obrębie przejść dla pieszych bez sygnalizacji świetlnej. Transport miejski i regionalny. 2021, Vol. 2, pp. 5-13. https://yadda.icm.edu.pl/baztech/element/bwmeta1.element.baztech-920ca812-1b41-4408-8ed3-a06f7d7ea1ea/c/TMiR_02_2021_Kesicka.pdf.
- Yang, Z.; Gong, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, J. Analysis of pedestrian-related crossing behavior at intersections: A Latent Dirichlet Allocation approach, International. Journal of Transportation Science and Technology. 2023, Vol. 12, Issue 4, 2023, pp. 1052-1063. [CrossRef]
- Available at: https://www.brd24.pl/prawo/jak-kraje-ue-chronia-pieszych/.
- Available at: https://sip.lex.pl/akty-prawne/dzu-dziennik-ustaw/prawo-o-ruchu-drogowym-16798732/art-26 (Art. 26. Prawo o ruchu drogowym. Zachowanie kierującego przed i na przejściu dla pieszych).
- Krzemień, P. Fakultatywny obowiązek zmniejszenia prędkości przed przejściem dla pieszych w kontekście zakazu wchodzenia bezpośrednio przed jadący pojazd. Paragraf na Drodze. 2022, Vol. 1, 21. [CrossRef]
- Stefański, R.A. Obowiązki kierujących pojazdami i pieszych przechodzących przez przejście dla pieszych po nowelizacji ustawy Prawo o ruchu drogowym. Paragraf na Drodze. 2022, Vol. 1, pp. 7-19. [CrossRef]
- Krzemień, P. Znaczenie pojęcia „pieszy wchodzący”—Głos polemiczny. Paragraf na Drodze, 2022, Vol. 4, 21–42. [CrossRef]
- Krzemień, P. Pierwszeństwo pieszego „wchodzącego” na przejście dla pieszych. Nowy przepis Prawa o ruchu drogowym w świetle procesu legislacyjnego, wystąpień posłów i senatorów oraz zasad opiniowania wypadków drogowych. Paragraf na Drodze, 2021, Vol. 3, pp. 7-32. (http://www.paragraf.ies.krakow.pl/paragraf-na-drodze-32021/).
- Małecki, M. Pierwszeństwo pieszego wchodzącego na przejście: Wchodzenie to proces, a nie podniesienie nogi. 2021. Available at: https://www.dogmatykarnisty.pl/2021/06/pierwszenstwo-pieszego-wchodzacego-na-przejscie/ (access: 09.07.2022 r.) https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/bitstream/handle/item/307774/malecki_pierwszenstwo_pieszego_wchodzacego_na_przejscie_dla_pieszych_2021.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
- Zhou Y.; Tan, G.; Zhong, R.; Li y.; Gou, C. PIT: Progressive Interaction Transformer for Pedestrian Crossing Intention Prediction, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 2023, Vol. 24, No. 12, pp. 14213-14225. [CrossRef]
- Xin, X.; Jia, N.; Ling, S.; He, Z. The effect of the ‘yield to pedestrians’ policy on risky pedestrian behaviors: Is it a ‘two-edged sword’?, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2023, Vol. 178, 103870. [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Z.; Liu, Y.; Liu, B.; Ouyang, M.; Tang, R. Pedestrian Crossing Intention Prediction Model Considering Social Interaction between Multi-Pedestrians and Multi-Vehicles. Transportation Research Record. 2023, 2678 (4). [CrossRef]
- Ustawa z dnia 20 czerwca 1997 r. Prawo o ruchu drogowym art. 2 pkt 11a (Dz.U.2023.1047 t.j.).







| Type of incident | All accidents | Pedestrians | Pedestrians at crossings | ||||||
| No.of incidents | Dynamics (2019 = 100) | No.of incidents | Dynamics (2019 = 100) | No.of incidents | Dynamics (2019 = 100) | ||||
| 2019 | 2022 | 2019 | 2022 | 2019 | 2022 | ||||
| POLAND | |||||||||
| killed | 2 909 | 1 896 | 65.2 | 793 | 460 | 58.0 | 234 | 145 | 62.0 |
| injured | 35 477 | 24 743 | 69.7 | 6 361 | 4 367 | 68.7 | 3 375 | 2 391 | 70.8 |
| severity1) | 7.6% | 7.1% | 93.9 | 11.1% | 9.5% | 86.0 | 6.5% | 5.7% | 88.2 |
| p2) | 0.0272 | 0.0064 | 0.2191 | ||||||
| PROVINCIAL CITIES | |||||||||
| killed | 195 | 145 | 74.4 | 107 | 64 | 59.8 | 55 | 29 | 52.7 |
| injured | 7 844 | 5 982 | 76.3 | 2 190 | 1 577 | 72.0 | 1 259 | 865 | 68.7 |
| severity1) | 2.4% | 2.4% | 97.6 | 4.7% | 3.9% | 83.7 | 4.2% | 3.2% | 77.5 |
| p2) | 0.8199 | 0.2498 | 0.2561 | ||||||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).