Submitted:
11 November 2024
Posted:
12 November 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
This research was carried out to investigate the effectiveness of the use of organic fertilizers in order to improve the organic seed production process and to increase the seed quality needed in organic agriculture production. The experiment was established with organic fertilizers (farmyard manure-FYM, leonardite-L, vermicompost-VC) and eggplant plant 'Pala-49' variety and conducted for two years. As a result of the study; plant height (52,65-68,06 cm), plant diameter (51,85-61,20 cm), fruit height (14,67-21,90 cm), fruit diameter (4,73-6,73 cm), number of seeds (1344-2508 pcs/fruit), seed weight (4,79-9,38 g/fruit) and germination percentage (14,67-21,90%) varied between FYM, L and VC organic fertilizer applications. In general, it was determined that the first year gave better results. In terms of parameters, the best result in all parameters was obtained from FYM organic fertilizer application. In addition, the nutrient element contents of the seed samples were found to be statistically significant. Organic applications significantly increased the nutrient element content of the seed samples according to the control. Nitrogen content varied between 0.242% and 0.271%, and phosphorus content varied between 0.274% and 0.456%. The highest K content was determined in FYM application in both years (0.272% and 0.309%), while Fe, Zn and Mn contents were 35.1 mg kg-1, 63.7 mg kg-1 and 200.7 mg kg-1 in VC application in the second year, respectively. The effect of the treatments on soil available nutrient content was also found to be significant. The amount of the soil available plant nutrients were higher in the second year.
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Material and Method
2.1. Fruit Analysis
2.2. Seed Analysis
2.3. Soil Analysis
2.4. Organic Fertilizer Analysis
2.5. Statistical Analysis
3. Result and Discussion
Nutrient Element Content
4. Conclusions
Contributions
Acknowledgements
Conflicts of Interests
References
- Sharma, J.; Agarwal, S. Impact of organic fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of spinach, Indian Journal of Plant Sciences, 2014, 3 (3), 37-43.
- Singh, A.P.; Luthria, D.; Wilson, T.; Vorsa, N.; Singh, V.; Banuelos, G.S.; Pasakdee, S. Polyphenols content and antioxidant capacity of eggplant pulp, Food Chemistry, 2009, 114, 955-961. [CrossRef]
- Anonymous, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, 2009.
- Ermiş, S.; Yanmaz, R. Organic Seed Certification in Turkey. Doğu Karadeniz II Organik Tarım Kongresi, 6-9 Ekim 2015, Rize, Turkey.
- Duman, İ. Determination of yield and quality characteristics in organic pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) seed production, Ege Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Derg., 2009, 46 (3), 155-163.
- Bonina, J.; Cantliffe, D.J. Seed Production and Seed Sources of Organic Vegetables, University of Florida, IFAS Extension, USA, 2004.
- Mishra, S.L.; Chatterjee, R.; Tamang, A.; Saha, K. Influence of enriched organic manure, biostimulants and bio-mulches on organic okra (Abelmoschus esculentus), Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 90 (6), 1115-1124. [CrossRef]
- Afa, M. The Effect of natural guano organic fertilizer on growth and yield of spring onion (Allium fistulosum L.). AgroTech Journal, 2016, 1(1), 26-32.
- Yang, Y.: Zhao, Z.; Dong, B.; Zhang, R.; Jiang, J.; Ma, F.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, J.; Du, D.; Qiu, J.; Li., C. Effects of Different Fertilization Measures on Bacterial Community Structure in Seed Production Corn Fields. Agronomy, 2024,14, 2459. [CrossRef]
- Maucieri, C.; Tolomio, M.; Raimondi, G.; Toffanin, A.; Morari, F.; Berti, A.; Borin, M. Organic versus conventional farming: Medium-term evaluation of soil chemical properties, Italian Journal of Agronomy, 2022, 17, 2114. [CrossRef]
- Tejada, M.; Gonzalez, J. Effects of the application of a compost originating from crushed cotton ginresidues on wheat yield under dryland conditions, Eur. Agron, J, 2003, 19, 357-368.
- Perez, D. V.; Alcantara, S.; Ribeiro, C. C.; Pereira, R.E.; Fontes, G. C.; Wasserman, M. A.; Venezuela, T. C.; Meneguelli, N. A.; De Macedo, J. R. C.; Barradas, A. AComposted municipal waste effects on chemical properties of a Brazilian soil. Bioresour. Technol, 2007, 98, 525-533.
- Iovieno, P.: Morra, L.; Leone, A.; Pagano, L.; Alfani, A. Effect of organic and mineral fertilizers on soil respiration and enzyme activities of two mediterranean horticultural soils. Biol Fertil Soils, 2009, 45, 555–561. [CrossRef]
- Dangi, S.; Gao, S.; Duan, Y.; Wang, D. Soil microbial community structure affected by biochar and fertilizer Sources. Applied Soil Ecology, 2020, 150, 103452. [CrossRef]
- Kılıç, B.; Sönmez, I. Determination of the effects of different organic fertilizers and doses on soil properties. Mediterranean Agrıcultural Sciences, 2019, 32, 91-96. [CrossRef]
- Yağmur, B.; Okur, B. The Effect of the Some Natural Soil Conditioners on Yield Parameters of Maize (Zea Mays L.), Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University, 2018, 55(4), 111-120.
- Sarioglu, A,; Dogan, K.; Kiziltug, T.; Coskan, A. Organo-mineral fertilizer applications for sustainable agriculture. Scientific Papers Series A. Agronomy, 2017, 60, 161-166.
- Holatko, J.; Hammerschmiedt, T.; Datta, R.; Baltazar, T.; Kintl, A.; Latal, O.; Pecina, V.; Novak, P.; Balakova, L.; Danish, S.; Zafar-ul-Hye, M.; Fahad, S.; Brtnicky M. Humic acid mitigates the negative effects of high rates of biochar application on microbial activity, Sustainability, 2020, 12(22), 9524. [CrossRef]
- Susic, M. Replenishing humic acids in agricultural soils. Agronomy, 2016, 6, 45. [CrossRef]
- Bellitürk K. Vermicomposting Technology For Solid Waste Management in Sustainable Agricultural Production. Çukurova Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi, 2016, 31(3), 1-5.
- Durukan H.; Saraç H.; Demirbaş A. The Effect of Different Doses of Vermicompost Application on Yield and Nutrient Uptake of Maize Plant. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 2020, Türkiye 13. Ulusal, I.Uluslararası Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi Özel Sayısı:45-51.
- Yaviç Ş.; Demir, S.; Boyno G. Determination of Effects of Worm Manure (Vermicompost) Application to Root Rot Dısease Caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary on Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2020, 25(1), 13-20.
- Alas, E.; Öztekin, G.B.; Boyacı, H.F. Recent situation of eggplant production in Turkey. Bahçe, 2022, 51 (1), 435-447. (in Turkish).
- Amal, K.; El-Goud, A. Efficiency Response of vermicompost and vermitea levels on growth and yield of eggplant (Solanum melongena, L.). Alexandrıa Scıence Exchange Journal, 2020, 41 (1), 69-75.
- Kacar, B.; İnal, A. Plant Analysis. Nobel Publishing No: 1241. Ankara, Turkey, 2010.
- Mclean, E.O. Soil pH and Lime Requirement. In: Page, A.L. (Ed) Methods of Soil Analysis, 1982, (pp.199-224), American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Madison.
- Rhoades, J.D. Soluble Salts. Methods of Soil Analysis, Chemical and Microbiological Properties, AL Page (Ed). American Soc. Ag. Inc. Pub. Agronomy Series, 1982, (pp. 167-178), Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
- Nelson, D.W.; Sommers, L.E. Total Carbon, Organic Carbon and Organic Matter. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties, AL, Page (Ed). American Soc. Ag. Inc. Pub. Agronomy Series, 1982, (pp. 595-579), Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
- Nelson, R.E. Carbonate and Gypsum. Methods of Soil Analysis, Chemical and Microbiological Properties, AL Page (Ed). American Soc. Ag. Inc. Pub. Agronomy Series, 1982, (pp. 181-196), Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
- Jones, J.B. Laboratory guide for conducting soil tests and plant analysis, CRC Pres, Washington, DC. 2001.
- Nilsson, S.I.; Jhonson, L.; Jennische, P. Sludge, treated biowaste and soil-determination of pH, a horizantal standard for pH measurement-the influence on pH measurements of sample pretreatment, ionic composition/ionic strength of the extractant and centrifugation/filtration. 2005, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.
- Anonymous. Organic Matter in Peat. Fertilizer AOAC Official Method of Analysis, 2005.
- Isaac, A.R.; Johnson, W.C. Elemental Determination by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emissio Spectrometry, In: Karla YP (Ed) Handbook of Reference Methods for Plant Analysis, (pp.165-170), 1998, CRC Press, Washington, D.C.
- Kurt, D.; Ayan, A.K. Effect of the different organic fertilizer sources and doses on yield in organic tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) production, Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpasa University, 2014, 31(2), 7-14.
- Azman, W.I.W. Effect of fertilizer rates on agronomic and chemical compozation of flue-cured Virginia Tobacco (Nicotiana Tabacum L.) in Peninsular Malaysia, Mardi Res. Bull., 1985, 13, 38-43.
- Camas, N.; Caliskan, O.; Odabas, M.S.; Ayan, A.K. The effects of organic originated fertilizer doses on yield and quality of esendal tobacco cultivar. Turkey VIII. Field Crops Congress. (pp.251-254), 19-22 October 2009, Hatay.
- Başay, S. Determination of yield and quality characteristics in organic eggplant (Solanum melongana L. var. Pala-49) seed production, Alatarım, 2021, 20 (2), 88-95.
- Zhuang, L.; Wang, P.; Hu, W.; Yang, R.; Zhang, Q.; Jian, Y.; Zou, Y. A Comprehensive Study on the Impact of Chemical Fertilizer Reduction and Organic Manure Application on Soil Fertility and Apple Orchard Productivity. Agronomy, 2024, 14, 1398. [CrossRef]
- Wen, M.; Zhang, J.; Zheng, Y.; Yi, S. Effects of Combined Potassium and Organic Fertilizer Application on Newhall Navel Orange Nutrient Uptake, Yield, and Quality. Agronomy, 2021, 11, 1990. [CrossRef]
- Abdul-Rahman, A-BI. Combined effect of organic and inorganic fertilizers on growth of rice plants. United Nations University Land Restoration Training Programme, Keldhahold, 112, 2019, Reykjavit, Iceland. (Final Project).
- Rahman, M.B.; Hossain, M.M.; Haque, M.M.; Ivy, N.A.; Ahmad, S. Seed production potentiality in yield and quality of eggplant (Solanum Melongena L.) grown under summer and winter seasons, Bangladesh J. Agril. Res., 2017, 42(3), 437-446. [CrossRef]
- Başay, S. The correlation between fruit morphology and seed characteristics in eggplant seed production, Fresenius Environment Bulletin, 2020, 30, 200- 212.
- Cebeci, E.; Padem, H. Relationship between fruit number and seed quality and quantity in F1 Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) seed production, Tarım Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi, 2014. 7 (1), 28-32.
- Önal, M.K.; Topcuoğlu, B. Mantar kompostu atığının serada yetiştirilen domates bitkisinin gelişme, meyvesel özellikler ve mineral içerikleri üzerine etkisi, (pp. 254-257), Türkiye V. Ulusal Bahçe Bitkileri Kongresi, Erzurum, 2007.Turkey (in Turkish).
- Aşık, B.B.; Turan, M.A.; Celik, H.; Katkat, A.V. Uptake of wheat (Triticum durun cv. Salihli) under conditions of salinity, Asian Journal Crop Science, 2009, 1, 87-95. [CrossRef]
- Ekici, E.N.; Demirkıran, A.R.; Boydak, E. The effect of leonardite as organic material on growth of Chickpea in the Kahramanmaraş condition, Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 6 (2), 118-134. [CrossRef]
- Küçükyumuk, C.; Yıldız, H.; Ünlükara, A. Determining of the Effects of Salinity Stress on Vegetative Development of Sweet Cherry Grafted on Different Rootstocks, Türkiye Tarımsal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2014, 1(2), 154-161.
- Sefaoğlu, F. Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizers or their combinations on yield and quality components of oil seed sunflower in a semi-arid environment, Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 2021, 26(1), 88-95. [CrossRef]
- Amir, K.; Fouzia, I. Chemical nutrient analysis of different composts (vermicompost and pitcompost) and their effect on the growth of a vegetative crop Pisum Sativum. Asian Journal of Plant Science and Research, 2011, 1(1), 116-130.
- Ramnarain, Y.I.; Ori, L.; Ansari, A.A. Effect of the use of vermicompost on the plant growth parameters of pak Choi (Brassica rapa var. chinensis) and on the soil Structure in Suriname, Journal of Global Agriculture and Ecology, 2018, 8(1), 8-15.
- Ravimycin, T. Effects of vermicompost (VC) and farmyard manure (FYM) on the germination percentage growth biochemical and nutrient content of Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.), International Journal of Advanced Research in Biological Sciences, 2016, 3(6), 91-98.
- Tepecik, M.; Kayıkçıoğlu, H.H.; Barlas, N.T.; Aşçıoğul, T.K.; Bozokalfa, M.K.; Eşiyok, D., Ayyılmaz, T.; Uzmay, C. The effect of composted farmyard manure applications on plant nutrient content of cabbage (Brassica oleraceae L. var. Capitata), ISPEC Journal of Agr. Sciences, 2020, 4(2), 366-377.
- Albiach, R.; Canet, R.; Pomares, F.;Ingelmo, F. Microbial biomass content and enzymatic activities after the application of organic amendments to a horticultural soil. Bioresource Technology, 2000, 75(1), 43-48. [CrossRef]
- Ros, M.; Klammer, S.; Knapp, B.; Aichberger, K.; Insam, H. Long-term effects of compost amendment of soil on functional and structural diversity and microbial activity, Soil Use Manage., 2006, 22, 209-218. [CrossRef]
- Maucieri, C.; Barco, A.; Borin, M. Compost as a substitute for mineral N fertilization? Effects on crops, soil and N leaching. Agronomy, 2019, 9, 193. [CrossRef]
- Yılmaz, F.I.; Kurt, S. Effect of biochar and vermicompost applications on some biological properties of soil, Toprak Bilimi ve Bitki Besleme Dergisi, 2018, 6(2), 143-150.
- Knapp, K.R.; Kruk, M.C.; Levinson, D.H.; Diamond, H.J., Neumann, C.J. The international best track archive for climate stewardship (IBTrACS) unifying tropical cyclone data, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 2010, 91(3), 363-376.
- Das, S.; Hussain, N.; Gogoi, B.; Buragohain, A.K., Bhattacharya, S.S. Vermicompost and farmyard manure improves food quality, antioxidant and antibacterial potential of Cajanus cajan (L.Mill sp.) leaves, Sci. Food Agric., 2017, 97, 956-966.
- Jamal, A.; Saeed, M.F.; Mihoub, A.; Hopkins, B.G.; Ahmad, I., Naeem, A. Integrated use of phosphorus fertilizer and farmyard manure improves wheat productivity by improving soil quality and P availability in calcareous soil under subhumid conditions, Front. Plant Sci., 2023, 14,1034421. [CrossRef]
- Pradhan, B.; Bhattacharyya, S.; Pal, K. IoT--based applications in healthcare devices, Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2021, 1, 6632599.
- Jamal, A.; Muhammad, D.; Jamal, H. Application of adsorption isotherms in evaluating the influence of humic acid and farmyard manure on phosphorous adsorption and desorption capacity of calcareous soil, World Sci. News., 2018, 107, 136-149.
- Wu, Y.; Li, Y.; Zheng, C.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, Z. Organic amendment application influence soil organism abundance in saline alkali soil, European Journal of Soil Biology, 2013, 54, 32-40. [CrossRef]
|
Months |
Old-Field Average | Year 2020 | Year 2021 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tempera-ture (°C) |
Precipi-tation (mm) |
Propor-tional Humi-dity (%) |
Tempera-ture (°C) |
Precipi-tation (mm) |
Propor-tional Humi-dity (%) |
Tempera-ture (°C) |
Precipi-tation (mm) |
Propor-tional Humidity (%) |
|
| May | 17.43 | 44.30 | 62.17 | 17.50 | 93.70 | 68.80 | 18.60 | 14.50 | 67.10 |
| June | 22.57 | 36.30 | 57.74 | 21.70 | 40.50 | 67.90 | 20.90 | 61.70 | 73.00 |
| July | 24.85 | 17.28 | 56.12 | 24.80 | 1.30 | 64.10 | 25.50 | 32.80 | 66.10 |
| August | 24.56 | 13.70 | 57.37 | 24.70 | 1.50 | 62.00 | 25.90 | 0.10 | 60.60 |
| Total | - | 111.58 | - | - | 148.70 | - | - | 109.10 | - |
| Average | 22.35 | - | 58.35 | 22.18 | - | 65.70 | 22.73 | 66.70 | |
| Characteristics | Values | Limit Values |
|---|---|---|
| % Sand | 27.2 | Clay |
| % Silt | 21.9 | |
| % Clay | 50.8 | |
| pH | 8.1 | Slightly alkaline |
| EC, µS cm−1 | 315 | No Salt |
| Lime, % | 5.8 | Medium calcareous |
| Organic matter, % | 3.1 | High |
| Total N, % | 0.298 | High |
| Available P, mg kg−1 | 25.0 | Very high |
| Available Na, mg kg−1 | 130.0 | Low |
| Available K, mg kg−1 | 54.6 | Very low |
| Available Ca, mg kg−1 | 4900 | Very high |
| Available e Mg, mg kg−1 | 23.6 | Very low |
| DTPA-Cu, mg kg−1 | 27.4 | Very high |
| DTPA-Zn, mg kg−1 | 2.0 | Low |
| DTPA-Mn, mg kg−1 | 12.9 | Low |
| DTPA-Fe, mg kg−1 | 14.7 | Middle |
| FYM | L | VC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 7.70 | 4,18 | 9.18 |
| EC, mS cm−1 | 3.2 | 3,75 | 6.97 |
| Organic matter, % | 75.03 | 55,14 | 47.3 |
| Total N,% | 2.1 | 1,45 | 0.95 |
| C:N ratio | 20.72 | 22.05 | 28.8 |
| Total P,% | 1.05 | 0.03 | 0.38 |
| Total K, % | 0.81 | 0.60 | 0.88 |
| Total Fe,% | 0.08 | 1.27 | 0.96 |
| Total Cu, mg kg−1 | 55.4 | 25.1 | 41.0 |
| Total Zn, mg kg−1 | 397.0 | 15.2 | 95.0 |
| Total Mn, mg kg−1 | 332.0 | 26.3 | 283.0 |
| Years | Application | Plant height (cm) | Plant diameter (cm) |
Fruit height (cm) | Fruit Diameter (cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st Year | Control | 57.26 b * | 54.00 ab | 15.85 b | 5.02 b |
| FYM | 68.06 a | 61.20 a | 21.90 a | 6.73 a | |
| L | 55.93 b | 52.13 b | 14.68 b | 5.06 b | |
| VC | 61.13 ab | 59.00 ab | 16.61 b | 4.89 b | |
| Means | 60.59 A | 56.58 A | 17.26 A | 5.42 B | |
| 2nd Year | Control | 55.81 b | 53.02 ab | 16.76 b | 4.73 c |
| FYM | 65.12 a | 60.50 a | 20.73 a | 6.70 a | |
| L | 52.65 b | 51.85 b | 14.67 b | 5.06 bc | |
| VC | 61.47 ab | 58.70 ab | 15.57 b | 5.54 b | |
| Means | 58.76 B | 56.01 B | 16.93 B | 5.50 A |
| Years | Application | Number of seeds (pcs/fruit) |
Seed weight (g/fruit) | Germination Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st Year | Control | 1519 b * | 5,58 b | 15,85 b |
| FYM | 2508 a | 9,38 a | 21,90 a | |
| L | 1383 b | 5,05 b | 14,68 b | |
| VC | 1344 b | 4,79 b | 16,61 b | |
| Means | 1688 A | 6,20 B | 17,18 A | |
| 2nd Year | Control | 1502 | 6,05 ab | 16,76 b |
| FYM | 2177 | 8,60 a | 20,73 a | |
| L | 1493 | 5,16 c | 14,67 b | |
| VC | 1424 | 5,69 b | 15,57 b | |
| Means | 1649 B | 6,37 A | 16,93 B |
| Years | Application | Plant Nutrient Element | ||||||||
|
N, % |
P, % |
K, % |
Ca, % |
Na, mg kg−1 |
Fe, mg kg−1 |
Cu, mg kg−1 |
Mn, mg kg−1 |
Zn, mg kg−1 |
||
| 1st Year | Control | 0,242 | 0,286 | 0,210 b * | 0,026 | 0,091 | 11,9 c y | 37,6 | 77,6 d* | 29,3 c* |
| FYM | 0,254 | 0,279 | 0,272 a | 0,038 | 0,103 | 17,6 c | 45,3 | 85,4 cd | 32,5 c | |
| L | 0,251 | 0,274 | 0,236 ab | 0,028 | 0,099 | 16,1 c | 43,8 | 93,7 cd | 28,8 c | |
| VC | 0,258 | 0,292 | 0,237 ab | 0,036 | 0,103 | 15,8 c | 47,3 | 110,3 c | 39,3 bc | |
| Means | 0,251 | 0,283 B** | 0,239 | 0,032 | 0,099 | 15,3 B** | 43,5 B ** | 91,7 B ** | 32,5 B** | |
| 2nd Year | Control | 0,247 | 0,417 | 0,248 ab y | 0,034 | 0,084 | 22,6 bc y | 72,0 | 146,6 b y | 41,7 bc y |
| FYM | 0,271 | 0,431 | 0,309 | 0,049 | 0,092 | 31,7 ab | 85,4 | 152,5 b | 52,5 ab | |
| L | 0,266 | 0,433 | 0,277 ab | 0,025 | 0,090 | 30,0 ab | 83,2 | 172,4 ab | 45,1 abc | |
| VC | 0,270 | 0,456 | 0,274 ab | 0,047 | 0,094 | 35,1 | 89,8 | 200,7 a | 63,7 a | |
| Means | 0,264 | 0,434 A | 0,277 | 0,039 | 0,090 | 29,9 A | 82,6 A | 168,0 A | 50,7 A | |
| * Letters indicate different groups at p ≤ 0.05 level. ** Letters indicate different groups at p ≤ 0.01 level. Lower case letters are used to compare the mean of treatments and upper case letters are used to compare the mean of years. | ||||||||||
| Years | Treatment | Soil Properties | ||||||||
| N, % |
P, mg kg−1 |
K, g kg−1 |
Ca, g kg−1 |
Na, mg kg−1 |
Fe, mg kg−1 |
Cu, mg kg−1 |
Mn, mg kg−1 |
Zn, mg kg−1 |
||
| 1st Year | Control | 0.145 | 92.5 | 0.078 | 4.083 | 0.079 | 46.61 | 6.51 | 33.3 | 6.51b* |
| FYM | 0.164 | 114.5 | 0.122 | 4.224 | 0.083 | 59.32 | 6.90 | 32.0 | 6.90b | |
| L | 0.145 | 124.8 | 0.065 | 4.396 | 0.083 | 53.70 | 6.62 | 29.2 | 6.90b | |
| VC | 0.154 | 149.0 | 0.082 | 4.316 | 0.084 | 51.15 | 8.29 | 38.8 | 8.29a | |
| Means | 0.152B * | 120.2 B* | 0.089 B | 4.255A | 0.082B | 52.697 | 7.08 | 32.2 B | 17.72 | |
| 2nd Year | Control | 0.164 | 136.5* | 0.086 | 4.105 | 0.110 | 50.07 | 7.10 | 41.81 | 18.92 |
| FYM | 0.181 | 196.2a | 0.196 | 4.081 | 0.109 | 51.14 | 7.09 | 55.13 | 22.17 | |
| L | 0.190 | 202.4a | 0.154 | 4.164 | 0.104 | 49.86 | 7.29 | 44.21 | 18.73 | |
| VC | 0.164 | 198.7a | 0.176 | 4.084 | 0.104 | 60.40 | 8.04 | 59.90 | 25.66 | |
| Means | 0.190 A | 183.4 A | 0.167 A | 4.109 B | 0.107 A | 52.863 | 7.38 | 48.3 A | 21.37 | |
| * Letters indicate different groups at p ≤ 0.05 level. Lower case letters are used to compare the mean of treatments and upper case letters are used to compare the mean of years. |
||||||||||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
