Submitted:
08 November 2024
Posted:
12 November 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
- Commercially viable DRT,
- Acceptable subsidy DRT,
- Justifiable higher subsidy DRT,
- Financially unsustainable DRT.
- Identify the main general contributions present in the literature, defining in particular whether these contributions are systematic literature reviews or general overviews; the aim is to identify the contributions that address, across the literature, the issues of on-demand transport in the passenger sector, the integration between passenger and freight transport and transport in rural areas;
- Analytically define the most recent contributions that focus on the integration between passenger and freight transport in rural areas; identify the main common research trends; classify these works according to territorial characteristics and their environmental, economic, and social sustainability objectives.
2. Overview of Literature Reviews
3. Methodology
- Identification: in this step the objectives of the research are defined, in terms of methods, keywords and databases considered. The total of the results obtained is the TOTAL RECORDS. The identification phase ends with the definition of the set of results purified from duplicates, RECORDS SCREENED. The number of duplicates obtained from the research is expressed by RECORDS REMOVED BEFORE SCREENING;
- Screening: the set of articles deprived of duplicates represents the total of the works that are subjected to the screening process. Once the criteria for carrying out the screening have been defined, starting from RECORDS SCREENED, three subsets are identified: RECORDS EXCLUDED, that is the set of articles removed from the search because they do not adhere to the theme of the same but are still results of the search methods carried out; REPORTS NOT RETRIEVED instead expresses the set of articles that, despite being on the theme, are inaccessible. The difference between the total of RECORDS SCREENED and the sum of these two sets expresses the REPORTS AS-SESSED FOR ELIGIBILITY;
- Eligibility: starting from the previous steps, all the unique articles, on topic and accessible to the authors, have been defined. In this phase, an in-depth study of the subset of REPORTS ASSESSED FOR ELIGIBILITY is carried out, defining the criteria for the definition of the studies and removing the EXCLUDED REPORTS that do not match the previously defined eligibility criteria;
- Inclusion: the last step therefore represents the definition of the final set of works included for qualitative and quantitative analyses.
3.1. Research Motivations and Questions
- RQ3.1 When were the works considered published, and whether particular temporal trends emerge;
- RQ3.2 Which are the geographical areas that are most driving research on the topic studied, and which are the geographical areas most interested in applications;
- RQ3.3 What is the real impact, actual or expected, of these methodologies, in terms of environmental, economic, and social sustainability;
- RQ3.4 Particular lines of research emerge, with marked differences in terms of the methodologies adopted.
3.2. Information Sources and Database
3.3. Key Terms and Search Strategy
3.4. Eligibility Criteria
- Duplicates have been removed. These articles are included in the REPORTS RE-MOVED BEFORE SCREENING;
- Articles that do not relate to the topic discussed have been removed. These articles fall into the RECORDS EXCLUDED;
- All works that did not have a text accessible to authors were excluded from the final analysis (REPORTS NOT RETRIEVED);
- All editorials and conference introductions were excluded. These articles are included in the REPORTS EXCLUDED;
- Articles and conference papers were included;
- No exclusions were made on a geographical or temporal basis;
- No exclusions were made based on the editor or journal.
3.5. Quality Assessment and Data Extraction
4. Results
4.1. Temporal Analysis by Year of Publication
4.2. Geographic characterization of studies
4.3. Overview of Proposed Workds.
5. Discussion
- Temporal and geographic characterization.
- Typology of services.
- Sustainability aspects.
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Statista. Share of the world’s population living in urban or rural areas from 1960 to 2023. 2024; Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1262483/global-urban-rural-population/.
- Eurostat. Urban-rural Europe - introduction. 2022; Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Urban-rural_Europe_-_introduction.
- United States Census Bureau. What is rural America? 2017.
- Statista. Urban and rural population of China from 2013 to 2023. 2024; Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/278566/urban-and-rural-population-of-china/.
- United Nations, Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. 2015.
- Statistics, U., Global indicator framework for the sustainable development goals and targets of the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Developmental Science and Sustainable Development Goals for Children and Youth, 2019. 439.
- Velaga, N.; Nelson, J.; Wright, S.; Farrington, J. The Potential Role of Flexible Transport Services in Enhancing Rural Public Transport Provision. J. Public Transp. 2012, 15, 111–131. [CrossRef]
- Dias, A., J. Telhada, and M.S. Carvalho, Economic evaluation of a demand responsive transport in rural areas. 2011.
- Dasgupta, P., et al., Rural areas. 2014.
- Engels, D., G. Ambrosino, and M. Boero, Service typologies and scenarios. Demand Responsive Transport Services: Towards the Flexible Mobility Agency. ENEA, Rome, 2004: p. 55-73.
- González, M.A., et al. Value of Reliability for the Waiting Stage, In-vehicle Stage and Transfer Stage of Demand Responsive Transport (DRT) Services. in Caspt 2018: 14th Conference on Advanced Systems in Public Transport and TransitData 2018. 2018.
- Mulley, C.; Nelson, J.D. Shaping the New Future of Paratransit: An Agenda for Research and Practice. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2016, 2542, 17–24. [CrossRef]
- Kujala, R.; Weckström, C.; Darst, R.K.; Mladenović, M.N.; Saramäki, J. A collection of public transport network data sets for 25 cities. Sci. Data 2018, 5, 180089. [CrossRef]
- Sloman, L. and P. Hendy, A new approach to rural public transport. Commission for Integrated Transport (CfIT) report, 2008.
- Enoch, M., et al., Inter-mode: Innovations in Demand Responsive Transport, Report for Department for Transport and Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Executive, Final report, London, Department for Transport. Final report. London: Department for Transport, 2004.
- Kou, X.; Zhang, Y.; Long, D.; Liu, X.; Qie, L. An Investigation of Multimodal Transport for Last Mile Delivery in Rural Areas. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1291. [CrossRef]
- Antoniou, C., S. Nocera, and Y. Susilo, The integration of passenger and freight transport: Trends, gaps and future research challenges. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH. PART A, POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2023. 173(July, art. n. 103724).
- Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Int. J. Surg. 2010, 8, 336–341. [CrossRef]
- Cavallaro, F.; Nocera, S. Integration of passenger and freight transport: A concept-centric literature review. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2021, 43, 100718. [CrossRef]
- Davison, L.; Enoch, M.; Ryley, T.; Quddus, M.; Wang, C. Identifying potential market niches for Demand Responsive Transport. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2012, 3, 50–61. [CrossRef]
- Ryley, T.J.; Stanley, P.A.; Enoch, M.P.; Zanni, A.M.; Quddus, M.A. Investigating the contribution of Demand Responsive Transport to a sustainable local public transport system. Res. Transp. Econ. 2014, 48, 364–372. [CrossRef]
- Fuchs, D., Integration of freight transportation in demand responsive transport systems. 2020.
- Butler, L.; Yigitcanlar, T.; Paz, A. How Can Smart Mobility Innovations Alleviate Transportation Disadvantage? Assembling a Conceptual Framework through a Systematic Review. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6306. [CrossRef]
- Battellino, H. Transport for the transport disadvantaged: A review of service delivery models in New South Wales. Transp. Policy 2009, 16, 123–129. [CrossRef]
- O’Shaughnessy, M.; Casey, E.; Enright, P. Rural transport in peripheral rural areas. Soc. Enterp. J. 2011, 7, 183–190. [CrossRef]
- Petersen, T. Watching the Swiss: A network approach to rural and exurban public transport. Transp. Policy 2016, 52, 175–185. [CrossRef]
- Graham, S.; Barnett, J.; Mortreux, C.; Hurlimann, A.; Fincher, R. Local values and fairness in climate change adaptation: Insights from marginal rural Australian communities. World Dev. 2018, 108, 332–343. [CrossRef]
- Axsen, J. and B.K. Sovacool, The roles of users in electric, shared and automated mobility transitions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2019. 71: p. 1-21.
- Freiberg, G.; Bueno, L.; Pizzol, B.; Escalante, D.; Pérez, T. Demand Responsive Transit: Understanding Emerging Solutions. WR I MÉXICO, May, 2021: p. 1-58. [CrossRef]
- Currie, G.; Fournier, N. Why most DRT/Micro-Transits fail – What the survivors tell us about progress. Res. Transp. Econ. 2020, 83, 100895. [CrossRef]
- Schasché, S.E.; Sposato, R.G.; Hampl, N. The dilemma of demand-responsive transport services in rural areas: Conflicting expectations and weak user acceptance. Transp. Policy 2022, 126, 43–54. [CrossRef]
- Campisi, T.; Cocuzza, E.; Ignaccolo, M.; Inturri, G.; Tesoriere, G.; Canale, A. Detailing DRT users in Europe over the last twenty years: a literature overview. Transp. Res. Procedia 2023, 69, 727–734. [CrossRef]
- Cavallaro, F.; Nocera, S. Flexible-route integrated passenger–freight transport in rural areas. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pr. 2023, 169. [CrossRef]
- El Amrani, A.M.; Fri, M.; Benmoussa, O.; Rouky, N. The Integration of Urban Freight in Public Transportation: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2024, 16, 5286. [CrossRef]
- Parmaksız, D.; Ülkü, M.A.; Weigand, H. Investigating Rural Logistics and Transportation through the Lens of Quadruple Bottom Line Sustainability. Logistics 2024, 8, 81. [CrossRef]
- Corporation, M. Microsoft Excel 2024; Available from: https://office.microsoft.com/excel.
- Aria, M.; Cuccurullo, C. bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J. Informetr. 2017, 11, 959–975. [CrossRef]
- Begnini, N.Q.; Morita, H. Analysis of last-mile operations for mobility and logistics in rural areas. World Rev. Intermodal Transp. Res. 2023, 11, 235–257. [CrossRef]
- Molenbruch, Y.; Braekers, K.; Hirsch, P.; Oberscheider, M. Analyzing the benefits of an integrated mobility system using a matheuristic routing algorithm. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2021, 290, 81–98. [CrossRef]
- Van Duin, R., et al., Evaluating new participative city logistics concepts: The case of cargo hitching. Transportation Research Procedia, 2019. 39: p. 565-575.
- Yang, T.; Chu, Z.; Wang, B. Feasibility on the integration of passenger and freight transportation in rural areas: A service mode and an optimization model. Socio-Economic Plan. Sci. 2023, 88. [CrossRef]
- Kamau, J., et al. Hybrid multiservice demand responsive mobility service for developing countries. in eChallenges e-2015 Conference. 2015.
- Franco, P.; Kaba, D.; Close, S.; Jundi, S. Introduction of emerging mobility services in rural areas through the use of mobile network data combined with activity-based travel demand modelling. IET Intell. Transp. Syst. 2023, 17, 1509–1524. [CrossRef]
- He, D.; Ceder, A.(.; Zhang, W.; Guan, W.; Qi, G. Optimization of a rural bus service integrated with e-commerce deliveries guided by a new sustainable policy in China. Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 2023, 172. [CrossRef]
- Zeng, Z.; Qu, X. Optimization of Electric Bus Scheduling for Mixed Passenger and Freight Flow in an Urban-Rural Transit System. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2022, 24, 1288–1298. [CrossRef]
- He, D.; Guan, W. Promoting service quality with incentive contracts in rural bus integrated passenger-freight service. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pr. 2023, 175. [CrossRef]
- Staritz, J., et al. Rebalancing Integrated, Demand-Responsive Passenger and Freight Transport – An Agent-Based Simulation Approach. in 2023 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC). 2023.
- Prillard, O., A. Karahasanovic, and A.L. Culén. Sustainability driven MaaS for rural areas. in 2023 8th International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Technologies (SpliTech). 2023.
- Ringsberg, H. Sustainable FLM transport based on IPF transport by ferry in coastal rural areas: A case from Sweden. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pr. 2023, 178. [CrossRef]
- Xue, Y.; Tu, H.; Zhang, B.; Tan, C.; Kong, Q.; Guan, H. The operation mechanism of integrating urban and rural passenger transportation and logistics under the strategy of rural revitalization–Case study of Lianhua County, China. Case Stud. Transp. Policy 2024, 16. [CrossRef]
- Namgung, H., et al., Estimating Heterogeneous Value of time for an Integrated Transport between Passenger and Goods: A Case study in a Japanese Rural area. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 2019. 13: p. 1321-1332.






| Goals | Targets | Indicators |
|---|---|---|
| Goal 1. End poverty in all its forms everywhere | 1.1 By 2030, eradicate extreme poverty for all people everywhere, currently measured as people living on less than $1.25 a day | 1.1.1 Proportion of the population living below the international poverty line by sex, age, employment status and geographic location (urban/rural) |
| Goal 2. End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture | 2.a Increase investment, including through enhanced international cooperation, in rural infrastructure, agricultural research and extension services, technology development and plant and livestock gene banks in order to enhance agricultural productive capacity in developing countries, in particular least developed countries | |
| Goal 4. Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all | 4.5 By 2030, eliminate gender disparities in education and ensure equal access to all levels of education and vocational training for the vulnerable, including persons with disabilities, indigenous peoples and children in vulnerable situations | 4.5.1 Parity indices (female/male, rural/urban, bottom/top wealth quintile and others such as disability status, indigenous peoples and conflict-affected, as data become available) for all education indicators on this list that can be disaggregated |
| Goal 9. Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation | 9.1 Develop quality, reliable, sustainable and resilient infrastructure, including regional and transborder infrastructure, to support economic development and human well-being, with a focus on affordable and equitable access for all | 9.1.1 Proportion of the rural population who live within 2 km of an all-season road |
| Goal 11. Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable | 11.a Support positive economic, social and environmental links between urban, peri-urban and rural areas by strengthening national and regional development planning |
| Authors | Year | DRT-Focused | Rural-Focused | Integration Goods-Passengers | Literature Review |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davison, Enoch [20] | 2012 | x | x | General Overview | |
| Ryley, A. Stanley [21] | 2014 | x | x | General Overview | |
| Fuchs [22] | 2020 | x | x | x | General Overview |
| Butler, Yigitcanlar [23] | 2020 | x | SLR | ||
| Currie and Fournier [30] | 2020 | x | General Overview | ||
| Freiberg, Bueno [29] | 2021 | x | x | General Overview | |
| Cavallaro and Nocera [19] | 2022 | x | x | SLR | |
| Schasché, Sposato [31] | 2022 | x | General Overview | ||
| Campisi, Cocuzza [32] | 2023 | x | General Overview | ||
| Cavallaro and Nocera [33] | 2023 | x | x | Case study/General Overview | |
| El Amrani, Fri [34] | 2024 | x | x | SLR | |
| Parmaksız, Ülkü [35] | 2024 | x | x | SLR |
| Authors | Year | Cathegory | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Begnini, N. Q., & Morita, H. | 2023 | ARTICLE | [38] |
| Molenbruch, Y., Braekers, K., Hirsch, P., & Oberscheider, M. | 2021 | ARTICLE | [39] |
| Van Duin, R., Wiegmans, B., Tavasszy, L., Hendriks, B., & He, Y. | 2019 | CONFERENCE $$PAPER | [40] |
| Yang, T., Chu, Z., & Wang, B. | 2023 | ARTICLE | [41] |
| Cavallaro, F., & Nocera, S. | 2023 | ARTICLE | [33] |
| Kamau, J., Rebeiro-Hargrave, A., Hossain, N., Hossein, Z., Okajima, H., & Ahmed, A. | 2015 | CONFERENCE $$PAPER | [42] |
| Franco, P., Kaba, D., Close, S., & Jundi, S. | 2023 | ARTICLE | [43] |
| He, D., Ceder, A. A., Zhang, W., Guan, W., & Qi, G. | 2023 | ARTICLE | [44] |
| Zeng, Z., & Qu, X. | 2022 | ARTICLE | [45] |
| He, D., & Guan, W. | 2023 | ARTICLE | [46] |
| Staritz, J., Kütemeier, J., Sand, H., von Viebahn, C., & Wartenberg, M. | 2023 | CONFERENCE $$PAPER | [47] |
| Prillard, O., Karahasanovic, A., & Culén, A. L. | 2023 | CONFERENCE $$PAPER | [48] |
| Ringsberg, H. | 2023 | ARTICLE | [49] |
| Xue, Y., Tu, H., Zhang, B., Tan, C., Kong, Q., & Guan, H. | 2024 | ARTICLE | [50] |
| Namgung, H., Fujiwara, A., Chikaraishi, M., & Kuwano, M. | 2019 | CONFERENCE $$PAPER | [51] |
| Authors | Area Considered | Country | Territorial Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| Begnini, N. Q., & Morita, H. | Akaiwa, Okayama Prefecture | Japan | City |
| Van Duin, R., Wiegmans, B., Tavasszy, L., Hendriks, B., & He, Y. | Millingen aan de Rijn (near Nijmegen) | Netherlands | Municipality |
| Kamau, J., Rebeiro-Hargrave, A., Hossain, N., Hossein, Z., Okajima, H., & Ahmed, A. | Bheramara upazila (in Kushtia district) | Bangladesh | Upazila (Sotto-distretto) |
| Kamau, J., Rebeiro-Hargrave, A., Hossain, N., Hossein, Z., Okajima, H., & Ahmed, A. | Kalihati upazila (in Tangail district) | Bangladesh | Upazila (Sotto-distretto) |
| Franco, P., Kaba, D., Close, S., & Jundi, S. | Northumberland | UK | County |
| Franco, P., Kaba, D., Close, S., & Jundi, S. | Essex County | UK | County |
| Zeng, Z., & Qu, X. | Yushe County, Shanxi Province | China | County |
| Staritz, J., Kütemeier, J., Sand, H., von Viebahn, C., & Wartenberg, M. | Sarstedt | Germany | Municipality |
| Prillard, O., Karahasanovic, A., & Culén, A. L. | Folldal | Norway | Municipality |
| Ringsberg, H. | Tuvesvik e le isole Gullholmen and Karingon | Sweden | Islands |
| Namgung, H., Fujiwara, A., Chikaraishi, M., & Kuwano, M. | città di Iwami, prefettura di Tottori | Japan | City |
| Yang, T., Chu, Z., & Wang, B. | Longkou County, Shandong Province | China | County |
| Cavallaro, F., & Nocera, S. | Misano Adriatico | Italy | Municipality |
| He, D., & Guan, W. | Shucheng County, Anhui Province | China | County |
| He, D., Ceder, A. A., Zhang, W., Guan, W., & Qi, G. | Shucheng County, Anhui Province | China | County |
| Xue, Y., Tu, H., Zhang, B., Tan, C., Kong, Q., & Guan, H. | Lianhua County, Jiangxi Province | China | County |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).