Submitted:
23 October 2024
Posted:
24 October 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Material and Methodology
2.1. Material and Specimens
2.2. Methodology
3. Results and Discussion


4. Conclusions
- The impact toughness is higher after post tempering water cooling compared to air or muffle furnace cooling.
- The specimen cooled at water at 10 ºC after tempering (fastest cooling), shows a fibrous fracture with presence of voids/dimples while the specimen cooled in the muffle furnace (slowest cooling) shows a pseudo-cleavage mode of fracture, showing brittle zones and grain boundary embrittlement or intergranular fracture.
- High cooling rates after the tempering prevent the carbides positioning in the prior austenite grain boundaries which deal to better combination of toughness and mechanical properties of the specimens.
- Slow cooling rates contribute to the formation of carbides along the prior austenite grain boundaries, which is the main cause of the grain boundaries weakness appreciated during the fractography analysis and the TE mechanism.
- Mainly iron, chromium, molybdenum and vanadium carbides were found at prior austenite grain boundaries. No significant chemical differences between carbides located inside or in the grain boundaries of prior austenite grains have been found.
- The addition of molybdenum in 0.65% does not eliminate the TE phenomena in this steel for cases where the cooling rate is too slow.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Olefjord, “Temper embrittlement,” International Metals Reviews, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 149–163, 1978. [CrossRef]
- M. Militzer and J. Wieting, “Segregation mechanisms of temper embrittlement,” Acta Metallurgica, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 2585–2593, 1989. [CrossRef]
- C. J. McMahon, “The influence of Mo on P-lnduced temper embrittlement in Ni-Cr steel,” Metallurgical Transactions A, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 1055–1057, 1977. [CrossRef]
- V. v. Zabil’skii, “ Temper embrittlement of structural alloy steels (review),” Metal Science and Heat Treatment, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 32–42, 1987. [CrossRef]
- S. G. Park, K. H. Lee, M. C. Kim, and B. S. Lee, “Effects of boundary characteristics on resistance to temper embrittlement and segregation behavior of Ni–Cr–Mo low alloy steel,” Materials Science and Engineering: A, vol. 561, pp. 277–284, Jan. 2013. [CrossRef]
- S. G. Park, M. C. Kim, B. S. Lee, and D. M. Wee, “Evaluation of temper embrittlement effect and segregation behaviors on Ni-Mo-Cr high strength low alloy RPV steels with changing P and Mn contents,” Journal of Korean Institute of Metals and Materials, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 122–132, Feb. 2010. [CrossRef]
- Y. Guo, M. Wang, K. Wang, and S. H. Song, “Relation of embrittlement to phosphorus grain-boundary segregation for an advanced Ni–Cr–Mo RPV steel,” Journal of Materials Research and Technology, vol. 18, pp. 2240–2249, May 2022. [CrossRef]
- K. Yang, L. Wang, Z. Sun, J. Liu, S. Liu, and X. Jin, “Effect of silicon addition on phosphorus segregation at grain boundary and temper embrittlement of Fe-C-Mn-xSi steels,” Mater Lett, vol. 320, p. 132342, Aug. 2022. [CrossRef]
- F. Dong et al., “The influence of phosphorus on the temper embrittlement and hydrogen embrittlement of some dual-phase steels,” Materials Science and Engineering: A, vol. 854, p. 143379, 2022. [CrossRef]
- Y. Zhao and S. Song, “Combined Effect of Phosphorus Grain Boundary Segregation, Yield Strength, and Grain Size on Embrittlement of a Cr–Mo Low-Alloy Steel,” Steel Res Int, vol. 89, no. 8, Aug. 2018. [CrossRef]
- G. Yang, C. Wang, X. quan Liu, and Z. dong Liu, “Embrittlement Mechanism due to Slow Cooling During Quenching for M152 Martensitic Heat Resistant Steel,” Journal of Iron and Steel Research International, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 60–66, Jun. 2010. [CrossRef]
- J. Li, C. Zhang, and Y. Liu, “Influence of carbides on the high-temperature tempered martensite embrittlement of martensitic heat-resistant steels,” Materials Science and Engineering: A, vol. 670, pp. 256–263, Jul. 2016. [CrossRef]
- G. Chakraborty et al., “Study on tempering behaviour of AISI 410 stainless steel,” Mater Charact, vol. 100, pp. 81–87, Feb. 2015. [CrossRef]
- S. S. M. Tavares, R. P. C. da Cunha, C. Barbosa, and J. L. M. Andia, “Temper embrittlement of 9%Ni low carbon steel,” Eng Fail Anal, vol. 96, pp. 538–542, 2019. [CrossRef]
- J.-H. Min et al., “Embrittlement mechanism in a low-carbon steel at intermediate temperature,” Mater Charact, vol. 149, pp. 34–40, 2019. [CrossRef]
- R. Mishnev, Y. Borisova, T. Kniaziuk, S. Gaidar, and R. Kaibyshev, “Quench and Tempered Embrittlement of Ultra-High-Strength Steels with Transition Carbides,” Metals (Basel), vol. 13, no. 8, 2023. [CrossRef]
- V. Dudko, D. Yuzbekova, S. Gaidar, S. Vetrova, and R. Kaibyshev, “Tempering Behavior of Novel Low-Alloy High-Strength Steel,” Metals (Basel), vol. 12, no. 12, 2022. [CrossRef]
- J. Tian, K. Chen, H. Li, and Z. Jiang, “Suppressing grain boundary embrittlement via Mo-driven interphase precipitation mechanism in martensitic stainless steel,” Materials Science and Engineering: A, vol. 833, p. 142529, 2022. [CrossRef]
- V. K. Euser, D. L. Williamson, K. O. Findley, A. J. Clarke, and J. G. Speer, “The Role of Retained Austenite in Tempered Martensite Embrittlement of 4340 and 300-M Steels Investigated through Rapid Tempering,” Metals (Basel), vol. 11, no. 9, 2021. [CrossRef]
- V. K. Judge, J. G. Speer, K. D. Clarke, K. O. Findley, and A. J. Clarke, “Rapid Thermal Processing to Enhance Steel Toughness,” Sci Rep, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 445, 2018. [CrossRef]
- X. Wei, T. Gong, X. Cao, G. Zhao, and Z. Zhang, “Effects of Lath Boundary Segregation and Reversed Austenite on Toughness of a High-Strength Low-Carbon Steel,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 1484–1494, 2024. [CrossRef]
- V. Yadav, A. K. Singh, and G. Sahoo, “Effect of tempering temperature on microstructure and mechanical properties of low alloy high strength steel,” Journal of Metals, Materials and Minerals, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 16–21, 2018.
- E. Claesson et al., “Carbide Precipitation during Processing of Two Low-Alloyed Martensitic Tool Steels with 0.11 and 0.17 V/Mo Ratios Studied by Neutron Scattering, Electron Microscopy and Atom Probe,” Metals (Basel), vol. 12, no. 5, 2022. [CrossRef]
- E. Tkachev et al., “Effect of quenching and tempering on structure and mechanical properties of a low-alloy 0.25C steel,” Materials Science and Engineering: A, vol. 868, p. 144757, 2023. [CrossRef]
- S. Teramoto et al., “Influence of Iron Carbide on Mechanical Properties in High Silicon-added Medium-carbon Martensitic Steels,” ISIJ International, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 182–189, 2020. [CrossRef]
- M. Li, T. Jia, L. Ma, X. Zhao, and Z. Wang, “Investigation on Temper Embrittlement of TS1100 MPa Grade Ultra-High Strength Steel,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, vol. 51, no. 10, pp. 5306–5317, 2020. [CrossRef]
- L. Morsdorf, A. Kashiwar, C. Kübel, and C. C. Tasan, “Carbon segregation and cementite precipitation at grain boundaries in quenched and tempered lath martensite,” Materials Science and Engineering: A, vol. 862, p. 144369, 2023. [CrossRef]
- X. Wei, T. Gong, X. Cao, G. Zhao, and Z. Zhang, “Effects of Lath Boundary Segregation and Reversed Austenite on Toughness of a High-Strength Low-Carbon Steel,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 1484–1494, 2024. [CrossRef]
- C. Yang, T. Xu, H. Zhao, C. Hu, and H. Dong, “Regulation Law of Tempering Cooling Rate on Toughness of Medium-Carbon Medium-Alloy Steel,” Materials, vol. 17, no. 1, 2024. [CrossRef]
- J. Schibler, C. D’Ambra, M. Roberts, M. V Manuel, T. W. Krause, and A. Saleem, “Temper embrittlement in HY-80 steel: Microstructure, magnetic and microhardness properties,” NDT & E International, vol. 132, p. 102728, 2022. [CrossRef]



| C | Mn | Si | P | S | Cr | Ni | Mo | V | Cu | Al |
| 0.236 | 1.25 | 0.25 | 0.009 | 0.005 | 1.070 | 1.15 | 0.65 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.015 |
| Sn | Ti | B | H | O | N | As | Sb | |||
| 0.011 | 0.0020 | 0.0002 | 0.00009 | 0.0017 | 0.0060 | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| UTS (MPa) | YS (MPa) | (%) | Z (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ≥ 1000 | ≥ 760 | 12 | 50 |
| Specimen | Tempering cooling media |
|---|---|
| 1 | Muffle furnace |
| 2 | Air cooling |
| 3 | Water 80 ºC |
| 4 | Water 60 ºC |
| 5 | Water 40 ºC |
| 6 | Water 10 ºC |
| Specimen | Tempering cooling media |
Average hardness value (HV1) |
Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Muffle furnace | 347 | 1 |
| 2 | Air cooling | 350.3333333 | 0.503322296 |
| 3 | Water 80 ºC | 347.4666667 | 0.37859389 |
| 4 | Water 60 ºC | 349.4 | 0.655743852 |
| 5 | Water 40 ºC | 344.5666667 | 1.05039675 |
| 6 | Water 10 ºC | 348.9 | 0.818535277 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).