Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio and C-Reactive Protein in Patients with COVID-19: Correlations in Deceased and Surviving Patients

Submitted:

17 October 2024

Posted:

18 October 2024

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
COVID-19 is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) associated with inflammatory process activation. Among the elements involved in the inflammatory process are leukocytes and cytokine production. Various studies have determined the importance of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in different inflammatory processes. C-reactive protein (CRP) is involved in several infectious processes as a marker of inflammation. This study aims to determine the values of NLR and CRP in COVID-19 patients and controls and to determine these values in COVID-19 survivors and deceased patients. Overall, during COVID-19, lymphocyte counts, NLR, and CRP values were significantly increased.Furthermore, it was observed that during the disease, there were more positive correlations between the different inflammatory parameters studied than between the controls. The results show that surviving patients had increased lymphocyte counts and CRP content compared to deceased patients; however, the latter presented the highest NLR values and the lowest lymphocyte values, establishing a prognostic value of severe evolution. The number of significant correlations observed in surviving and deceased patients was similar. This study suggests the importance of leukocytes and CRP in COVID-19 and a possible predictive value for the severe evolution of NLR in the disease.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. This virus affects different organs and tissues by inducing exacerbated inflammation (1,2) due to the interaction of the virus with its enzymatic receptor ACE2 (angiotensin-converting enzyme 2), inducing a decrease in the activity and expression of this enzyme and a subsequent increase in angiotensin II (Ang II) and a severe systemic proinflammatory state known as "cytokine storm" (2–5).
Previous reports have identified Ang II as an inducer of proinflammatory cytokines, including C-reactive protein (CRP), so the increase in this indicator in SARS-CoV-2 infection has been associated with mortality, capable of causing damage during SARS-CoV-2 infection (2,6-8). C-reactive protein has long been used to indicate acute phase inflammation (9); However, in COVID-19, it is related to tissue damage and poor disease prognosis (10). In this regard, elevated levels of CRP in the early phase of COVID-19 have been associated with lung damage and disease severity (11-13).
The relationship between the absolute neutrophil count and the absolute lymphocyte count (neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio: NLR) has become a crucial marker of systemic inflammation in recent years (14), and its elevation has been described in several chronic inflammatory processes as it reflects both the adaptive immune response (mediated by lymphocytes) and the innate immune response (mediated by neutrophils) (14,15).
Two recently published works suggest that an increase in NLR predicts severe disease due to COVID-19. Although these are post hoc analyses of retrospective studies carried out in the Chinese population, these studies use the NLR value with different cut-off points and at different times of the disease (16,17). So far, we have not found any published work on NLR and COVID-19, nor have we even found NLR and CRP in Ecuador, which would provide important information on the pathophysiological implications of the disease.
The general population of Ecuador was subjected to the COVID-19 pandemic for several months, resulting in a large number of affected people and numerous deaths (18,19). The application of many inflammatory markers has been limited in daily clinical practice due to their costs and technical difficulties in measurement. The role that determining NLR would play during COVID-19 and its relationship with another inflammation marker, such as CRP, has not been reported in this disease. All studies focused on analysing the pathogenesis of this disease will be beneficial for the preventive and therapeutic approaches of patients affected by the disease in the country.
Studying the association of these inflammatory parameters (NLR, CRP) can provide important information on the pathophysiological implications of COVID-19. Both parameters have been described as sensitive markers of the inflammatory response. However, it is worth noting that NLR measurement is a cheaper, more routine and easily measurable variable calculated by quantifying routinely analysed leukocytes. This research aims to determine NLR values ​​and CRP levels in patients with COVID-19, comparing the results between infected individuals who survived and those who died.

2. Materials and Methods

This retrospective study was conducted on patients with suspected COVID-19 from various clinical institutions in Portoviejo, Manabí, Ecuador, from March to June 2021. A total of N=41 COVID-19-positive patients were included and evaluated for SARS-CoV-2. A nasopharyngeal swab sample was taken from each patient to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA by RT-PCR using the cobas® SARS-CoV-2 Qualitative assay from Roche Molecular Systems INC. The collected samples were taken using a standard technique in viral culture medium and sent to molecular biology laboratories for processing in hospitals authorised by the National Institute of Public Health Research (INSPI) of Ecuador, which met the requirements in time and form for the study. The patients were classified into two groups according to their results (survivor: 24 and deceased: 19).
Data such as age and sex, complete blood count with differential count (lymphocyte and neutrophil count) and C-reactive protein levels were collected from each patient's medical records. A venous blood sample with EDTA anticoagulant (3 ml) was taken to perform a Complete Hematology, which was processed by the electrical impedance method for the count and the SFT method for haemoglobin in a BC-2600 Auto Hematology Analyzer (Vitalab Distributor). Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) calculation was made by dividing the absolute neutrophil count by the absolute lymphocyte count. To determine C-reactive protein (CRP), blood without anticoagulant (5 ml) was taken from each patient to obtain serum. PCR was assessed using an Azmoon PARS CRP immunoturbidimetry kit on a HITACHI 7600-020 automated biochemical analyser.
The study was reviewed and approved by the Bioethics Committee of the Faculty of Health Sciences of the Technical University of Manabí in compliance with the Ethical Standards and Principles. Statistical analysis was performed using the Jamovi project, version 2.3 (2022). Measurement data with normal distribution are represented as mean ± standard deviation. For continuous variables that were normally distributed, differences between the two groups were compared using Welch's t-test. Correlation analysis was calculated using the Pearson correlation test. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

This study included 41 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, of which 36.6% were men (15) and 63.4% (26) were women. Table 1 depicts blood variables and C-reactive protein values of deceased patients with those who survived. Excluding age, significant differences were observed in all variables compared to deceased vs survivor patients, in which circulating neutrophils, lymphocytes, and CRP were significantly lower in deceased patients than survivors, while N/L ratio was significantly higher in deceased patients.
Table 2 displays a correlation matric analysis between age (X±SD: 54.58± 16.42) haematologic variables, NLR, and CRP in deceased patients. It was observed that there was a positive and statistically significant correlation between lymphocytes and age, NLR and age, and NLR and neutrophils. In contrast, a statistically significant negative correlation was observed between NLR and lymphocytes. The correlation coefficients (r) ranged from 0.493 to 0.544, indicating a moderate association between these variables.
Table 3 displays a correlation matric analysis between age (X±SD: 52.91± 17.12), haematologic variables, NLR, and CRP in survivor patients. It was observed that there was a positive and statistically significant correlation between Neutrophils and age, lymphocytes and age, Neutrophils and lymphocytes, and CRP with Age, Neutrophils and Lymphocytes. The correlation coefficients (r) ranged from 0.521 to 0.797, indicating a moderate to strong association between these variables.

4. Discussion

The disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) began spreading at the end of 2019 and became a pandemic in 2020. This virus is highly contagious and has threatened health and life worldwide since its onset (20). Most infected individuals are asymptomatic or present mild symptoms and have early remission (21). However, some patients develop severe symptoms that can lead to death. There are few studies on the characteristics of biometric parameters associated with disease severity and progression in patients who have died and those who have survived COVID-19.
The increase in CRP has been previously documented in this viral infection, representing a cytokine not only as a marker of inflammation but also as an effector, contributing to the damage caused by SARS-CoV-2 (2). Most patients show normal white blood cell counts or lymphopenia, which may be involved in the higher NLR values (22). High NLR values have been associated with inflammatory processes (14,15,23); SARS-CoV-2 infection represents a parameter for severe disease evolution (24-26).
In pathophysiological terms, lymphopenia represents a depletion of lymphocytes in response to excessive inflammation where the organism, to compensate for this situation, produces abundant proinflammatory cytokines, leading to a cytokine storm and severe disease evolution (27). This association was evidenced in our findings, where deceased patients showed higher NLR values than survivors, possibly due to higher lymphocyte count values in surviving patients. The lower lymphocyte production in deceased patients is possibly related to disease severity. In this regard, the number of lymphocytes has been reported to be decreased in SARS-CoV-2 infection, associated with high viral load and increased organ damage, and thus the severe course of the disease. (26).
Correlation analyses between the different parameters were significant between deceased and surviving patients. Regarding the number of correlations, there were significant differences related to the pathogenesis of the disease in survivor patients. In this regard, CRP values were positively correlated with neutrophil counts, lymphocyte counts, and age in survivor patients. The effector role of CRP in COVID-19 as an inflammation-inducing cytokine has been previously reported. (2). The correlation between CRP and the number of neutrophils and lymphocytes suggests a role of this cytokine in leukocyte increment. In this regard, CRP may induce hepatic production of IL-6 (28,29), a leukocytosis-inducing cytokine.
IL6 is essential in the progression of COVID-19, perpetuating the cytokine storm in patients, thus promoting the differentiation and activation of immune cells residing in different tissues; an example occurs in alveolar macrophages, alveolar megakaryocytes and neutrophils, which, when exposed to high amounts of IL6, release extracellular quantities of neutrophils to the affected bloodstream or parenchyma. Neutrophils can behave as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), activating macrophages, platelets (PLT) and lymphocytes, and an elevated proinflammatory and pro-thrombotic profile. Consequently, leukocyte migration to sites of extensive tissue damage increases signalling and alteration in immune regulation, with a decrease in the lymphocyte population responsible for self-limiting inflammatory stimuli. On the other hand, IL6 stimulates the production of fibrinogen/fibrin due to endothelial injury, producing an increase in C-reactive protein (CRP). This mechanism could explain the high CRP levels in patients who managed to survive COVID-19 (30).
However, although the poor prognosis of COVID-19 has been reported in patients with high levels of CRP and leukocytosis (31), in this study, the CRP behaviour was different; that is, it was high in survivors. Many of the discrepancies shown in various studies concerning the parameters evaluated may be due to the demographic characteristics and comorbidities of the population studied, sample size and type of study carried out.
In the case of deceased patients, age was correlated with leukocytosis at the expense of lymphocytes, which is probably related to the negative tension between NLR values and lymphocytes, which could represent a detrimental factor in the deceased group. Studies report similar results where CRP is positively correlated with NLR and NLR is negatively correlated with total leukocyte count in patients without defining the degree of severity (24).
The value of NLR as a predictor factor of COVID-19 evolution remains controversial. (32). Some studies have reported that the NLR value predicts the severe evolution of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients. It has also been reported (22/33) that NLR values of 5.5 or higher are highly predictive in COVID-19 diagnosis and progression (91.4%). However, other researchers disagree with those findings, as NLR values can be affected by various conditions such as other infections, corticosteroids, malignancies, alcohol consumption, bleeding, and other conditions, concluding that the routine use of NLR in the prognosis and progression of COVID-19 to severity requires further study (34,35). Our study shows that the severe evolution of patients infected by SARS-CoV-2 (patients who died) was related to high NLR values.
The present study had several limitations, some of them being the number of samples analysed and selected, limiting the possibility that the results could be extrapolated to other populations. As it is retrospective, the data collected corresponds to clinical electronic history records, subject to biases inherent to data recording. The study was carried out at the beginning of the pandemic, when the behaviour of the virus variants that affected the population at that time was still unknown, making it difficult to track and monitor each marker given the emergency condition with which these patients were admitted to the hospital. On the other hand, the vaccine application had not yet come into effect, which is why the clinical symptoms were much more serious. Although we found significant associations associated with the severity of the disease, more multicenter studies are needed with a larger number of participants, allowing our findings to be replicated in a large percentage of the national population.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, patients who progressed to death had low leukocyte counting with lower CRP levels alongside higher NLR values compared with surviving patients. The number of correlations was similar in deceased and surviving patients. In deceased patients, CRP was positively correlated with leukocytes, neutrophils, and age. In surviving patients, CRP was positively correlated with lymphocytes and age and negatively correlated with NLR, while age was positively correlated with lymphocytes and negatively correlated with NLR. This study shows the importance of leukocytes and CRP in the pathophysiology of COVID-19 and a possible predictive value for the severe evolution of NLR in the disease.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, DCV, JMS, LGSG, AKCZ, DRP, VB and JLGZ; methodology, DCV, JMS, LGSG, AKCZ, DRP, VB and JLGZ; software, DCV, VB and JLGZ; formal analysis, DCV, VB and JLGZ; investigation, DCV, JMS, LGSG, AKCZ, DRP, VB and JLGZ; resources, DCV, JMS, LGSG, AKCZ, DRP, VB and JLGZ; data curation, DRP and VB; writing—original draft preparation, DCV, JMS, LGSG, AKCZ, DRP, VB and JLGZ; writing—review and editing, DCV, JMS, LGSG, AKCZ, DRP, VB and JLGZ; visualisation, DCV, JMS, LGSG, AKCZ, DRP, VB and JLGZ; supervision, DCV, VB and JLGZ; project administration, DCV, VB and JLGZ; funding acquisition, DRP and VB All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Internal funds for research strengthening were sourced from the Universidad Simón Bolívar, Vicerrectoría de Investigación, Extensión e Innovación, Barranquilla, Colombia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by FCS-UTM Biotehics committee. Constance CB-265-21, and date of approval 08-11-21 for studies involving humans.

Informed Consent Statement

It does not apply, I do not work with human beings. Retrospective study.

Data Availability Statement

Harvard Dataverse. Número de identificación de datos: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/0HGJSG, URL directa a los datos: https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/0HGJSG

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Mohamadian M, Chiti H, Shoghli A, Biglari S, Parsamanesh N, Esmaeilzadeh A. COVID-19: Virology, biology and novel laboratory diagnosis. J Gene Med. 2021 Feb;23(2): e3303. [CrossRef]
  2. Mosquera-Sulbaran JA, Pedreañez A, Carrero Y, Callejas D. C-reactive protein as an effector molecule in Covid-19 pathogenesis. Rev Med Virol. 2021 Nov;31(6): e2221. [CrossRef]
  3. Bourgonje AR, Abdulle AE, Timens W, Hillebrands JL, Navis GJ, Gordijn SJ, et al. Angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), SARS-CoV-2 and the pathophysiology of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Vol. 251, Journal of Pathology. 2020. p. 228–48. [CrossRef]
  4. Cheng H, Wang Y, Wang GQ. Organ-protective effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 and its effect on the prognosis of COVID-19. Vol. 92, Journal of Medical Virology. 2020. p. 726–30. [CrossRef]
  5. Kai H, Kai M. Interactions of coronaviruses with ACE2, angiotensin II, and RAS inhibitors-lessons from available evidence and insights into COVID-19. Hypertens Res. 2020 Jul;43(7):648–54. [CrossRef]
  6. Bannaga AS, Tabuso M, Farrugia A, Subashini Chandrapalan S, Karenjit Somal K, Voon Kune Lim VK, Shahd Mohamed S, et al. C-reactive protein and albumin association with mortality of hospitalised SARS-CoV-2 patients: a tertiary hospital experience. Clin Med. 2020;20: 463-467. [CrossRef]
  7. Cillóniz C, Torres A, Garcia-Vidal C, Estela Moreno-Garcia E, Rosanel Amaro R, Nestor Soler N, et al. The value of C-reactiv protein-to-lymphocyte ratio in predicting the severity of SARSCoV-2 pneumonia. Arch Bronconeumol. 2020; S0300- 2896:30277-30285. [CrossRef]
  8. Torzewski J, Heigl F, Zimmermann O. First-in-Man: case report of selective C- reactive protein apheresis in a patient with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Am J Case Rep. 2020;21: e925020. [CrossRef]
  9. Baumeister D, Akhtar R, Ciufolini S, Pariante CM, Mondelli V. Childhood trauma and adulthood inflammation: a meta-analysis of peripheral C-reactive protein, inetleukin- 6 and tumour necrosis factor-α. Mol Psychiatry. 2016; 21:642-649. [CrossRef]
  10. Mosquera-Sulbaran J, Pedreañez A, Carrero Y, Callejas D. C-reactive protein as an effector molecule in the COVID-19 pathogenesis. Reviews in Medical Virology. 2021; 1-8, e2221. [CrossRef]
  11. RodOviedo- Trespalacios JEO, Cortes-Ramirez J. A brief-review of the risk factors for covid-19 severity. Rev Saude Publica. 2020; 54:60. [CrossRef]
  12. Luo X, Zhou W, Yan X, Tangxi Guo T, Benchao Wang B, Hongxia Xia H, et al. Prognostic value of C-reactive protein in patients with COVID-19. Clin Infect Dis. 2020: ciaa641. [CrossRef]
  13. Wang L. C-reactive protein levels in the early stage of COVID-19. Med Mal Infect. 2020; 50:332-33434. [CrossRef]
  14. Shiny A, Bibin YS, Shanthirani CS, Regin BS, Anjana RM, Balasubramanyam M, et al. Association of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio with glucose intolerance: an indicator of systemic inflammation in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014 Aug;16(8):524–30. [CrossRef]
  15. Balta S, Celik T, Mikhailidis DP, Ozturk C, Demirkol S, Aparci M, Iyisoy A. The Relation Between Atherosclerosis and the Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2016; 22:405-411. [CrossRef]
  16. Lagunas-Rangel FA. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A meta- analysis. J Med Virol 2020. [CrossRef]
  17. Liu J, Liu Y, Xiang P, Pu L, Xiong H, Li C, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts critical illness patients with 2019 coronavirus disease in the early stage. J Transl Med. 2020;18: 206. [CrossRef]
  18. Chen X, Zhang SX, Jahanshahi AA, Alvarez-Risco A, Dai H, Li J, Ibarra VG. Belief in a COVID-19 Conspiracy Theory as a Predictor of Mental Health and Well-Being of Health Care Workers in Ecuador: Cross-Sectional Survey Study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020;6(3): e20737. /: https. [CrossRef]
  19. Cañizares Fuentes R, Aroca R, Blasco Carlos M. Evaluation of COVID- 19 Surveillance Strategy in Ecuador. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020; 9:1-4. /: https. [CrossRef]
  20. Lu R, Zhao X, Li J, Niu P, Yang B, Wu H, et al. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: im-plications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet (London, England). 2020 Feb;395(10224):565–74.
  21. Zhang J-J, Dong X, Cao Y-Y, Yuan Y-D, Yang Y-B, Yan Y-Q, et al. Clinical characteristics of 140 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan, China. Allergy. 2020 Jul;75(7):1730–41. [CrossRef]
  22. Zhu J, Ji P, Pang J, Zhong Z, Li H, He C, et al. Clinical characteristics of 3062 COVID-19 patients: A meta-analysis. J Med Virol. 2020 Oct;92(10):1902–14. [CrossRef]
  23. Pedreáñez A, Mosquera-Sulbarán J, Robalino J, Tene D, Muñóz N. Elevación del índice neutrófilo/linfocito y su relación con la proteína C reactiva en pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2. Rev la Soc Argentina Diabetes. 2021;55(3):77–83.
  24. Mousavi-Nasab SD, Mardani R, Nasr Azadani H, Zali F, Ahmadi Vasmehjani A, Sabeti S, et al. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and C-reactive protein level as prognostic markers in mild versus severe COVID-19 patients. Gastroenterol Hepatol from bed to bench. 2020;13(4):361–6.
  25. Yufei Y, Mingli L, Xuejiao L, Xuemei D, Yiming J, Qin Q, et al. Utility of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and C-reactive protein level for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2020 Nov;80(7):536–40. [CrossRef]
  26. Liu Y, Liao W, Wan L, Xiang T, Zhang W. Correlation between relative nasopharyngeal virus RNA load and lymphocyte count disease severity in patients with COVID-19. Viral Immunol. 2021;34(5):330–5. [CrossRef]
  27. Fathi N, Rezaei N. Lymphopenia in COVID-19: Therapeutic opportunities. Cell Biol Int. 2020 Sep;44(9):1792–7. [CrossRef]
  28. Liu F, Li L, Xu M, Wu J, Luo D, Zhu Y, et al. Prognostic value of interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin in patients with COVID-19. J Clin Virol Off Publ Pan Am Soc Clin Virol. 2020 Jun; 127:104370. [CrossRef]
  29. Han H, Ma Q, Li C, Liu R, Zhao L, Wang W, et al. Profiling serum cytokines in COVID-19 patients reveals IL-6 and IL-10 are disease severity predictors. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020 Dec;9(1):1123–30. [CrossRef]
  30. Gómez-de-Segura GD, González MO, Pedraza MA. Asociación de marcadores inflamatorios en COVID-19 severo al ingreso con mortalidad y disfunción orgánica. Med Crit. 2023;37(4):276-290. [CrossRef]
  31. Yamada T, Wakabayashi M, Yamaji T, Chopra N, Mikami T, Miyashita H, et al. Value of leukocytosis and elevated C-reactive protein in predicting severe coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Chim Acta. 2020 Oct; 509:235–43. [CrossRef]
  32. Tatum D, Taghavi S, Houghton A, Stover J, Toraih E, Duchesne J. Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Outcomes in Louisiana COVID-19 Patients. Shock. 2020 Nov;54(5):652–8. [CrossRef]
  33. Sayed AA, Allam AA, Sayed AI, Alraey MA, Joseph M V. The use of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a marker for COVID-19 infection in Saudi Arabia: A case-control retrospective multicenter study. Saudi Med J. 2021 Apr;42(4):370–6. [CrossRef]
  34. Bedel C, Korkut M, Armağan HH. Comment on '"Can the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) have a role in the diagnosis of coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19)?"' Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2021;67(Suppl 1):168–9. [CrossRef]
  35. Bedel C, Korkut M. Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Covid-19. Shock [Internet]. 2021 Nov;56(5):874. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/10.1097/SHK.0000000000001712.
Table 1. Blood markers between surviving and deceased COVID-19 patients.
Table 1. Blood markers between surviving and deceased COVID-19 patients.
All patients Deceased Survivors
Parameters X±SD Min value Max value X±SD Min value Max value X±SD Min value Max value P values
Age (years) 53.68±16.61 16 86 54.58± 16.42 18 86 52.91± 17.12 16 84 NS
Neutrophils (K/µL) 12.16±5.78 3.11 23.65 9.35±5.32 3.11 23.65 14.58±5.10 3.51 19.34 0.003
Lymphocytes (K/µL) 4.40±3.24 0.22 11.0 1.49± 0.90 0.22 3.05 6.90± 2.26 1.84 11.02 < .001
NLR 6.44±11.95 1.12 75.23 11.29±16.43 1.21 75.23 2.25±1.13 1.13 6.68 0.028
CRP (mg/L) 51.73±29.86 12.0 96.0 30.02± 21.50 13.0 77.0 71.38±21.66 12.0 96.0 < .001
Welch t-test was used for all pairwise comparisons. Abreviations: NLR: Neutrophil / Lymphocyte ratio; CRP: C-reactive protein; COVID-19: N=41; Deceased: n = 19; Survivors: n = 22. Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (X±SD); Min: value minimum; Max: value maximum; NS: No statistically significant.
Table 2. Correlation analysis matrix between quantitative variables in deceased patients.
Table 2. Correlation analysis matrix between quantitative variables in deceased patients.
Variables AGE Neutrophils (K/µL) Lymphocytes (K/µL) NLR CRP (mg/L)
r value p-value r value p-value r value p-value r value p-value r value p-value
AGE - -
Neutrophils (K/µL) 0.115 0.639 - -
Lymphocytes (K/µL) 0.544* 0.016 -0.104 0.673 - -
NLR 0.520* 0.023 0.493* 0.032 -0.538 0.017 - -
CRP (mg/L) 0.382 0.106 0.086 0.725 -0.011 0.966 0.025 0.920 - -
Pearson's correlations test. NLR: Neutrophil / Lymphocyte ratio; CRP: C-reactive protein; Deceased: n=19.
Table 3. Correlations analysis matrix between quantitative variables in survivor patients.
Table 3. Correlations analysis matrix between quantitative variables in survivor patients.
Variables AGE Neutrophils (K/µL) Lymphocytes (K/µL) NLR CRP (mg/L)
r value p-value r value p-value r value p-value r value p-value r value p-value
AGE - -
Neutrophils (K/µL) 0.521* 0.013 - -
Lymphocytes (K/µL) 0.690*** <0.001 0.645* 0.001 - -
NLR 0.299 0.176 0.321 0.146 -0.400 0.065 - -
CRP (mg/L) 0.715*** <0.001 0.593** 0.004 0.797*** <0.001 0.330 0.134 - -
Pearson's correlations test. NLR: Neutrophil / Lymphocyte ratio; CRP: C-reactive protein; Survivors: n=22.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated