Submitted:
12 October 2024
Posted:
15 October 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Plant Material
2.2. Extraction Methods
2.3. FTIR Analysis
2.4. Anti-MRSA Activity
2.5. GC-MS Analysis
2.6. Molecular Docking Studies
2.6.1. Sample Preparation (Virtual Screening)
2.6.2. Molecular Docking
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Extraction Optimization
3.2. FTIR Profiling Analysis
3.3. Anti-MRSA Activity
3.4. GC-MS Metabolite Characterization
3.5. Molecular Docking Analysis
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bashabsheh, R.H.; Al-Fawares, O.L.; Natsheh, I.; Bdeir, R.; Al-Khreshieh, R.O.; Bashabsheh, H.H. Staphylococcus aureus Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Clinical Manifestations, and Application of Nano-Therapeutics as a Promising Approach to Combat Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Pathogens Glob. Health 2024, 118, 209–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nanayakkara, A.K.; Boucher, H.W.; Fowler, V.G. Jr.; Jezek, A.; Outterson, K.; Greenberg, D.E. Antibiotic Resistance in the Patient with Cancer: Escalating Challenges and Paths Forward. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 488–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Popovich, K.J.; Aureden, K.; Ham, D.C.; Harris, A.D.; Hessels, A.J.; Huang, S.S.; et al. SHEA/IDSA/APIC Practice Recommendation: Strategies to Prevent Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Transmission and Infection in Acute-Care Hospitals: 2022 Update. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2023, 44, 1039–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- López-Cortés, L.E.; Gálvez-Acebal, J.; Rodríguez-Baño, J. Therapy of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: Evidences and Challenges. Enferm. Infecc. Microbiol. Clin. 2020, 38, 489–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jubair, N.; Rajagopal, M.; Chinnappan, S.; Abdullah, N.B.; Fatima, A. Review on the Antibacterial Mechanism of Plant-Derived Compounds Against Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria (MDR). Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2021, 2021, 3663315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tran, V.T.; Nguyen, T.B.; Nguyen, H.C.; Do, N.H.; Le, P.K. Recent Applications of Natural Bioactive Compounds from Piper betle (L.) Leaves in Food Preservation. Food Control 2023, 110026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, H.S.; Mishra, S. Natural Products as Antiparasitic, Antifungal, and Antibacterial Agents. Drugs from Nature: Targets, Assay Systems and Leads 2024, 367–409.
- Ueda, J.M.; Milho, C.; Heleno, S.A.; Soria-Lopez, A.; Carpena, M.; Alves, M.J.; et al. Emerging Strategies to Combat Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): Natural Agents with High Potential. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2023, 29, 837–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ali, R.A. Review on Extraction of Phenolic Compounds from Natural Sources Using Green Deep Eutectic Solvents. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 878–912. [Google Scholar]
- Verma, N.; Gautam, B.S. Piper betle: Deep Insights into the Pharmacognostic and Pharmacological Perspectives. Int. J. Med. Phar. Sci. 2024, 13, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garcia-Vaquero, M.; Ummat, V.; Tiwari, B.; Rajauria, G. Exploring Ultrasound, Microwave and Ultrasound–Microwave Assisted Extraction Technologies to Increase the Extraction of Bioactive Compounds and Antioxidants from Brown Macroalgae. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chandrakasan, G.; García-Trejo, J.F.; Feregrino-Pérez, A.A.; Aguirre-Becerra, H.; García, E.R.; Nieto-Ramírez, M.I. Preliminary Screening on Antibacterial Crude Secondary Metabolites Extracted from Bacterial Symbionts and Identification of Functional Bioactive Compounds by FTIR, HPLC, and Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry. Molecules 2024, 29, 2914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Noor, A.; Kamaraj, S.; Bhakti, M.A.; Kumari, C.; Kulshrestha, S.; Pandohee, J.; That, L.F.L.N. Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Honey Using Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry. In: Advanced Techniques of Honey Analysis; Academic Press: 2024; pp. 287–307.
- Cucinotta, L.; Rotondo, A.; Coppolino, S.; Salerno, T.M. Gas Chromatographic Techniques and Spectroscopic Approaches for a Deep Characterization of Piper gaudichaudianum Kunth Essential Oil from Brazil. J. Chromatogr. A 2024, 465208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Palermo, A. Metabolomics-and Systems-Biology-Guided Discovery of Metabolite Lead Compounds and Druggable Targets. Drug Discov. Today 2023, 28, 103460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Taibi, M.; Elbouzidi, A.; Ou-Yahia, D.; Dalli, M.; Bellaouchi, R.; Tikent, A.; et al. Assessment of the Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Potential of Ptychotis verticillata Duby Essential Oil from Eastern Morocco: An In Vitro and In Silico Analysis. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yasir, B.; Astuti, A.D.; Raihan, M.; Natzir, R.; Subehan, S.; Rohman, A.; Alam, G. Optimization of Pagoda (Clerodendrum paniculatum L.) Extraction Based on Analytical Factorial Design Approach, Its Phytochemical Compound, and Cytotoxicity Activity. Egypt J. Chem. 2022, 65, 421–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yasir, B.; Budiman, Alam, G. Chemometrics-Assisted Fingerprinting Profiling of Extract Variation from Pagoda (Clerodendrum paniculatum L.) Using TLC-Densitometric Method. Egypt J. Chem. 2023, 66, 1589–1596. 2023, 66, 1589–1596.
- Roshan, M.; Singh, I.; Vats, A.; Behera, M.; Singh, D.P.; Gautam, D.; et al. Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Effect of Cannabinoids from Cannabis sativa Against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Causing Bovine Mastitis. Int. Microbiol. 2024, 1–14, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martí, M.; Frígols, B.; Serrano-Aroca, A. Antimicrobial Characterization of Advanced Materials for Bioengineering Applications. JoVE 2018, 138. [Google Scholar]
- Alharthi, S.S. Bioactive Extracts of Plant Byproducts as Sustainable Solution of Water Contaminants Reduction. Arab. J. Chem. 2024, 17, 105864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sruthi, D.; Zachariah, T.J. Volatile and Non-Volatile Metabolite Profiling of Under-Explored Crop Piper colubrinum Link: With Chromatography Mass Spectrometry Approach and Its Biochemical Diversity from Medicinally Valued Piper Species. J. Chromatogr. B 2024, 124260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, K.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, N.; Jiang, P. High Throughput Virtual Screening and Validation of Plant-Based EGFR L858R Kinase Inhibitors Against Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: An Integrated Approach Utilizing GC–MS, Network Pharmacology, Docking, and Molecular Dynamics. Saudi Pharm. J. 2024, 32, 102139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hendrarti, W.; Umar, A.H.; Syahruni, R.; Rafi, M.; Kusuma, W.A. Deciphering the Mechanism of Action Cosmos caudatus Compounds Against Breast Neoplasm: A Combination of Pharmacological Networking and Molecular Docking Approach with Bibliometric Analysis. Indones. J. Sci. Technol. 2024, 9, 527–556. [Google Scholar]
- Nguyen, L.T.T.; Nguyen, T.T.; Nguyen, H.N.; Bui, Q.T.P. Simultaneous Determination of Active Compounds in Piper betle Linn. Leaf Extract and Effect of Extracting Solvents on Bioactivity. Eng. Rep. 2020, 2, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajopadhye, A.A.; Namjoshi, T.P.; Upadhye, A.S. Rapid Validated HPTLC Method for Estimation of Piperine and Piperlongumine in Root of Piper longum Extract and Its Commercial Formulation. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2012, 22, 1355–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, J.; Xiang, J.Y.; Yuan, H.Y.; Wu, J.Q.; Li, H.Z.; Shen, Y.H.; Xu, M. Isolation, Synthesis and Absolute Configuration of 4,5-Dihydroxypiperines Improving Behavioral Disorder in AlCl3-Induced Dementia. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2021, 42, 128057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nik, W.W.; Ravindran, K.; Al-Amiery, A.A.; Izionworu, V.O.; Fayomi, O.S.I.; Berdimurodov, E.; Daoudi, W.; Zulkifli, F.; Dhande, D.Y. Piper betle Extract as an Eco-Friendly Corrosion Inhibitor for Aluminium Alloy in Hydrochloric Acid Media. Int. J. Corros. Scale Inhib. 2023, 12, 948–960. [Google Scholar]
- Gorgani, L.; Mohammadi, M.; Najafpour, G.D.; Nikzad, M. Sequential Microwave-Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction for Isolation of Piperine from Black Pepper (Piper nigrum L.). Food Bioprocess Technol. 2017, 10, 2199–2207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, R.; Qin, X.W.; Hu, R.S.; Hu, L.S.; Wu, B.D.; Hao, C.Y. Studies on the Chemical and Flavour Qualities of White Pepper (Piper nigrum L.) Derived from Grafted and Non-Grafted Plants. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2020, 246, 2601–2610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramesh, B.; Sarma, V.U.M.; Kumar, K.; Babu, K.S.; Devi, P.S. Simultaneous Determination of Six Marker Compounds in Piper nigrum L. and Species Comparison Study Using High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry. J. Planar Chromatogr. 2015, 28, 280–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sateesh Reddy, K.; Siva, B.; Divya Reddy, S.; Kumar, K.; Pratap, T.V.; Vidyasagar Reddy, K.; Venkateswara Rao, B.; Suresh Babu, K. Monitoring of Chemical Markers in Extraction of Traditional Medicinal Plants (Piper nigrum, Curcuma longa) Using In Situ ReactIR. J. AOAC Int. 2021, 104, 1181–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Musa, T.A.; Sanagi, M.M.; Wan Ibrahim, W.A.; Ahmad, F.; Aboul-Enein, H.Y. Determination of 4-Allyl Resorcinol and Chavibetol from Piper betle Leaves by Subcritical Water Extraction Combined with High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. Food Anal. Methods 2014, 7, 893–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahmah, N.L.; Mustapa Kamal, S.M.; Sulaiman, A.; Taip, F.S.; Siajam, S.I. Subcritical Water Extraction of Total Phenolic Compounds from Piper betle L. Leaves: Effect of Process Conditions and Characterization. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2023, 17, 5606–5618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bouguettaya, A.; Yu, Q.; Liu, X.; Zhou, X.; Song, A. Efficient Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering. Expert Syst. Appl. 2015, 42, 2785–2797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, Z.; Wang, Z.; Shang, Z.; Zhao, J. Classification and Identification of Rhodobryum roseum Limpr. and Its Adulterants Based on Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and Chemometrics. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0170650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jantorn, P.; Tipmanee, V.; Wanna, W.; Prapasarakul, N.; Visutthi, M.; Sotthibandhu, D.S. Potential Natural Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Properties of Piper betle L. Against Staphylococcus pseudintermedius and Methicillin-Resistant Strains. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2023, 317, 116820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, G.J.; Humma, Z.E.; Omer, M.O.; Sattar, A.; Altaf, I.; Chen, Z.; He, N. Effects of Curcuma longa L. and Piper nigrum L. Against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Infectious Angiogenesis. J. Biobased Mater. Bioenergy 2024, 18, 303–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Umapathy, V.R.; Dhanavel, A.; Kesavan, R.; Natarajan, P.M.; Bhuminathan, S.; Vijayalakshmi, P. Anticancer Potential of the Principal Constituent of Piper nigrum, Piperine: A Comprehensive Review. Cureus 2024, 16, e44287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, S.; Malik, M.; Dastidar, D.G.; Roy, R.; Paul, P.; Sarkar, S.; Tribedi, P. Piperine, a Phytochemical, Prevents the Biofilm Formation of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A Biochemical Approach to Understand the Underlying Mechanism. Microb. Pathog. 2024, 189, 106601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahirrao, P.; Tambat, R.; Chandal, N.; Mahey, N.; Kamboj, A.; Jain, U.K.; Singh, I.P.; Jachak, S.M.; Nandanwar, H.S. MsrA Efflux Pump Inhibitory Activity of Piper cubeba L.f. and Its Phytoconstituents Against S. aureus RN4220. Chem. Biodivers. 2020, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Driche, E.H.; Belghit, S.; Bijani, C.; Zitouni, A.; Sabaou, N.; Mathieu, F.; Badji, B. A New Streptomyces Strain Isolated from Saharan Soil Produces Di-(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate, a Metabolite Active Against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Ann. Microbiol. 2015, 65, 1341–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zamakshshari, N.; Ahmed, I.A.; Nasharuddin, M.N.; Hashim, N.M.; Mustafa, M.R.; Othman, R.; Noordin, M.I. Effect of Extraction Procedure on the Yield and Biological Activities of Hydroxychavicol from Piper betle L. Leaves. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants 2021, 24, 100320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leesombun, A.; Sungpradit, S.; Bangphoomi, N.; Thongjuy, O.; Wechusdorn, J.; Riengvirodkij, S.; Boonmasawai, S. Effects of Piper betle Extracts Against Biofilm Formation by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius Isolated from Dogs. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Benjamin, I.; Louis, H.; Ekpen, O.F.; Gber, T.E.; Gideon, M.E.; Ahmad, I.; Ejiofor, E.U. Modeling the Anti-Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Activity of (E)-6-Chloro-N2-Phenyl-N4-(4-Phenyl-5-(Phenyl Diazinyl)-2λ3,3λ2-Thiazol-2-yl)-1,3,5-Triazine-2,4-Diamine. Polycycl. Aromat. Compd. 2023, 43, 7942–7969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lovering, A.L.; Gretes, M.C.; Safadi, S.S.; Danel, F.; De Castro, L.; Page, M.G.; Strynadka, N.C. Structural Insights into the Anti-Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Activity of Ceftobiprole. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 32096–32102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Janardhanan, J.; Bouley, R.; Martínez-Caballero, S.; Peng, Z.; Batuecas-Mordillo, M.; Meisel, J.E.; Chang, M. The Quinazolinone Allosteric Inhibitor of PBP 2a Synergizes with Piperacillin and Tazobactam Against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019, 63, 10–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bouley, R.; Kumarasiri, M.; Peng, Z.; Otero, L.H.; Song, W.; Suckow, M.A.; Mobashery, S. Discovery of Antibiotic (E)-3-(3-Carboxyphenyl)-2-(4-Cyanostyryl) Quinazolin-4(3H)-One. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 1738–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]








![]() |
| Sample Code |
Inhibition Zone (mm) | Tukey Simultaneous Tests for Differences of Means | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Difference of Levels | Differenceof Means | SE ofDifference | 95% CI | T-Value | AdjustedP-Value | ||
| 1 | 8 | 4 - 1 | -2.667 | 0.797 | (-5.388, 0.055) | -3.35 | 0.056 |
| 1 | 10 | 7 - 1 | 4.667 | 0.797 | (1.945, 7.388) | 5.86 | 0.001 |
| 1 | 9 | 8 - 1 | 5.667 | 0.797 | (2.945, 8.388) | 7.11 | 0.000 |
| 4 | 6 | 11 - 1 | 5.000 | 0.797 | (2.279, 7.721) | 6.27 | 0.000 |
| 4 | 6 | 16 - 1 | 10.333 | 0.797 | (7.612, 13.055) | 12.97 | 0.000 |
| 4 | 7 | Ciprofloxacin - 1 | 16.667 | 0.797 | (13.945, 19.388) | 20.92 | 0.000 |
| 7 | 14 | 7 - 4 | 7.333 | 0.797 | (4.612, 10.055) | 9.20 | 0.000 |
| 7 | 14 | 8 - 4 | 8.333 | 0.797 | (5.612, 11.055) | 10.46 | 0.000 |
| 7 | 13 | 11 - 4 | 7.667 | 0.797 | (4.945, 10.388) | 9.62 | 0.000 |
| 8 | 14 | 16 - 4 | 13.000 | 0.797 | (10.279, 15.721) | 16.31 | 0.000 |
| 8 | 15 | Ciprofloxacin - 4 | 19.333 | 0.797 | (16.612, 22.055) | 24.26 | 0.000 |
| 8 | 15 | 8 - 7 | 1.000 | 0.797 | (-1.721, 3.721) | 1.25 | 0.861 |
| 11 | 14 | 11 - 7 | 0.333 | 0.797 | (-2.388, 3.055) | 0.42 | 0.999 |
| 11 | 14 | 16 - 7 | 5.667 | 0.797 | (2.945, 8.388) | 7.11 | 0.000 |
| 11 | 14 | Ciprofloxacin - 7 | 12.000 | 0.797 | (9.279, 14.721) | 15.06 | 0.000 |
| 16 | 20 | 11 - 8 | -0.667 | 0.797 | (-3.388, 2.055) | -0.84 | 0.976 |
| 16 | 19 | 16 - 8 | 4.667 | 0.797 | (1.945, 7.388) | 5.86 | 0.001 |
| 16 | 19 | Ciprofloxacin - 8 | 11.000 | 0.797 | (8.279, 13.721) | 13.80 | 0.000 |
| Ciprofloxacin | 24 | 16 - 11 | 5.333 | 0.797 | (2.612, 8.055) | 6.69 | 0.000 |
| Ciprofloxacin | 28 | Ciprofloxacin - 11 | 11.667 | 0.797 | (8.945, 14.388) | 14.64 | 0.000 |
| Ciprofloxacin | 25 | Ciprofloxacin - 16 | 6.333 | 0.797 | (3.612, 9.055) | 7.95 | 0.000 |
| GC-MS Peaks |
Compounds | Molecular Formula | MW (g/mol) |
PubChem (CID) | RT (min) |
Area (%) | SI (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Green line) Piper nigrum fruit | |||||||
| 1 | Beta-caryophyllene oxide | C15H24O | 220 | 1742210 | 13.563 | 1.01 | 97 |
| 2 | Alpha-caryophylladienol | C15H24O | 220 | 14524923 | 14.276 | 1.69 | 97 |
| 3 | Pellitorine | C14H25NO | 223 | 5318516 | 18.772 | 5.08 | 93 |
| 4 | n-Hexadecanoic acid | C16H32O2 | 256 | 985 | 19.279 | 2.51 | 96 |
| 5 | Octadecanoic acid | C18H36O2 | 284 | 5281 | 23.877 | 1.42 | 93 |
| 6 | Diisooctyl phthalate | C24H38O4 | 390 | 33934 | 31.081 | 14.67 | 95 |
| 7 | (2E,4E)-N-Isobutylhexadeca-2,4-dienamide | C20H37NO | 307 | 6442402 | 31.595 | 1.78 | 90 |
| 8 | Piperanine | C17H21NO3 | 287 | 5320618 | 32.804 | 4.03 | 94 |
| 9 | Piperine | C17H19NO3 | 285 | 638024 | 37.762 | 14.22 | 93 |
| 10 | Piperolein B | C21H29NO3 | 343 | 21580213 | 41.639 | 1.58 | 93 |
| (Red line) Piper betle fruit | |||||||
| 11 | Chavibetol | C10H12O2 | 164 | 596375 | 10.420 | 12.01 | 97 |
| 12 | Hydroxychavicol | C9H10O2 | 150 | 70775 | 12.496 | 81.89 | 93 |
| Peak/ Compounds | Protein Target | Compounds | Bond-free energy (kcal/mol) | H-bond Interaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Native ligand | 4DKI | Ceftobiprole | -9.8 | LYS 406, SER 462, ASN 464, GLN 521, THR 600 |
| Positive control | Ciprofloxacin | -8.3 | LYS 406, SER 462, SER 643 | |
| 1 | Beta-caryophyllene oxid | -6.4 | NI | |
| 2 | Alpha-caryophylladienol | -6.4 | NI | |
| 3 | Diisooctyl phthalate | -7.1 | SER 462, TYR 446 | |
| 4 | Piperanine | -7.6 | LYS 406, SER 462 | |
| 5 | Piperine | -7.7 | GLN 521, THR 444, GLY 402, SER 400 | |
| 6 | Piperolein B | -8.3 | LYS 406, SER 462, ASN 464 | |
| 7 | Chavibetol | -5.7 | THR 600, ASN 464, SER 462, LYS 406 | |
| 8 | Hydroxychavicol | -5.7 | SER 462, ASN 464, SER 403 | |
| Native ligand | 6H5O | Piperacillin | -9.0 | THR 444, SER 598, SER 461, SER 403, LYS 406, ASN 464 |
| Positive control | Ciprofloxacin | -8.1 | LYS 406, SER 403, SER 462, SER 643 | |
| 1 | Beta-Caryophyllene oxide | -6.9 | ASN 464, LYS 406 | |
| 2 | Alpha-Caryophylladienol | -7.1 | SER 403, SER 462 | |
| 3 | Diisooctyl phthalate | -6.3 | ASN 464, THR 600 | |
| 4 | Piperanine | -7.3 | SER 598, THR 582, GLU 460, ARG 445 | |
| 5 | Piperine | -7.3 | SER 403, GLY 599 | |
| 6 | Piperolein B | -6.8 | ASN 464, SER 598, HIS 583 | |
| 7 | Chavibetol | -5.4 | SER 403, ASN 464, SER 462, THR 600 | |
| 8 | Hydroxychavicol | -5.6 | LYS 406, SER 403, SER 462, GLY 599 | |
| Native ligand | 4CJN | (E)-3-(2-(4-cyanostyryl)-4-oxoquinazolin-3(4H)-yl)benzoic acid | -7.2 | LYS 273, ALA 276, ASP 295 |
| Positive control | Ciprofloxacin | -6.2 | LYS 273, LYS 316, GLU 294 | |
| 1 | Beta-caryophyllene oxide | -5.2 | ASN 146 | |
| 2 | Alpha-caryophylladienol | -5.2 | NI | |
| 3 | Diisooctyl phthalate | -5.0 | LYS 273 | |
| 4 | Piperanine | -6.0 | ASP 295, VAL 277, GLN 292 | |
| 5 | Piperine | -6.5 | ALA 276 | |
| 6 | Piperolein B | -5.9 | NI | |
| 7 | Chavibetol | -4.6 | ASP 295, GLY 296 | |
| 8 | Hydroxychavicol | -4.9 | ASP 275 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
