Submitted:
22 September 2024
Posted:
24 September 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
Introduction
1. General Theory
2. Current Stage
3. Materials and Methods
4. Evaluation of Device Performance
4.1. Technical Assessment
4.1.1. Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) Calculation
4.1.2. Common Mode Rejection Ratio (CMRR) Computation
4.2. Device Testing in Experimental Conditions
4.2.1. Blinking Test
4.2.2. Alpha Rhythm Test
Conclusion
References
- C. Fonseca et al., “A Novel Dry Active Electrode for EEG Recording,” in IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 162-165, Jan. 2007. [CrossRef]
- Rakhmatulin, I., Gan, Y. (2021). Review Dry and Non-Contact EEG Electrodes for 2010-2021 Years. [CrossRef]
- Rakhmatulin, I. (2021). The electronic board to replace the reference voltage on the earlobe for EEG measurement. Measurement. Volume 173, March 2021, 108673. [CrossRef]
- M. Guermandi, R. Cardu, E. Franchi Scarselli and R. Guerrieri, “Active Electrode IC for EEG and Electrical Impedance Tomography With Continuous Monitoring of Contact Impedance,” in IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 21-33, Feb. 2015. [CrossRef]
- A. Dabbaghian and H. Kassiriю An Active Electrode IC with Embedded Analog CMRR Enhancement for Interference- and Gain-Mismatch-Resilient EEG Recording,” 2021 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS), Berlin, Germany, 2021, pp. 01-05. [CrossRef]
- Kyle E. Mathewson, Tyler J. L. Harrison, Sayeed A. D. Kizuk. High and dry? Comparing active dry EEG electrodes to active and passive wet electrodes. Volume54, Issue1. Special Issue: Re-centering science: Reliability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychophysiological Research. January 2017. Pages 74-82. [CrossRef]
- Guang-Li Li et al. (2020). Review of semi-dry electrodes for EEG recording. Journal of Neural Engineering, 17(5). [CrossRef]
- Lopez-Gordo, M.A.; Sanchez-Morillo, D.; Valle, F.P. Dry EEG Electrodes. Sensors 2014, 14, 12847–12870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarah Laszlo et al. (2014). A direct comparison of active and passive amplification electrodes in the same amplifier system. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, Volume 235, 30 September 2014, Pages 298-307. [CrossRef]
- Xu, Jiawei ; Yazicioglu, Refet Firat ; Van Hoof, Chris ; Makinwa, Kofi. (2018). Low Power Active Electrode ICs for Wearable EEG Acquisition.
- E. Habibzadeh Tonekabony Shad, M. Molinas and T. Ytterdal, “Impedance and Noise of Passive and Active Dry EEG Electrodes: A Review,” in IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 20, no. 24, pp. 14565-14577, 15 Dec.15, 2020. [CrossRef]
- V. Mihajlović and B. Grundlehner, “The effect of force and electrode material on electrode-to-skin impedance,” 2012 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS), Hsinchu, Taiwan, 2012, pp. 57-60. [CrossRef]
- S. Patki et al., “Wireless EEG system with real time impedance monitoring and active electrodes,” 2012 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS), Hsinchu, Taiwan, 2012, pp. 108-111. [CrossRef]
- Y. Jiang et al., “Flexible and Stretchable Dry Active Electrodes With PDMS and Silver Flakes for Bio-Potentials Sensing Systems,” in IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 12255-12268, 15 May15, 2021. [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.; Shin, Y.; Kumar, A.; Kim, K.; Lee, H.-N. Two-Wired Active Spring-Loaded Dry Electrodes for EEG Measurements. Sensors 2019, 19, 4572. [CrossRef]
- Y. Li, X. Xu, Y. Liu and Y. Tian, “Analysis and Implement of ECG Front-End Signal Processing Circuit,” 2011 International Conference of Information Technology, Computer Engineering and Management Sciences, Nanjing, China, 2011, pp. 309-312. [CrossRef]
- C. De Capua, A. Meduri and R. Morello, “A Smart ECG Measurement System Based on Web-Service-Oriented Architecture for Telemedicine Applications,” in IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 59, no. 10, pp. 2530-2538, Oct. 2010. [CrossRef]
- Rakhmatulin, I., et al. Low-cost brain computer interface for everyday use. Exp Brain Res 239, 3573–3583 (2021). [CrossRef]
- Rakhmatuiln, M. Zhanikeev and A. Parfenov, “Raspberry PI Shield—for measure EEG (PIEEG),” 2021 5th International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, Communication, Computer Technologies and Optimization Techniques (ICEECCOT), Mysuru, India, 2021, pp. 410-413. [CrossRef]
- Rakhmatulin, I. (2023). Device JNEEG to convert Jetson Nano to brain-Computer interfaces. Short report I Rakhmatulin—arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.11110, 2023.
- Geddes, L.A., Roeder, R. Criteria for the Selection of Materials for Implanted Electrodes. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 31, 879–890 (2003). [CrossRef]













| Characteristics | Electrode location in according to international system of placement of electrodes “10-20” for dry electrodes | |||||||
| F3 | F4 | T3 | Cz | T4 | T5 | T6 | Pz | |
| Measurement of Common-Mode Rejection Ratio CMRR, dB | 115 | 125 | 130 | 121 | 130 | 110 | 125 | 117 |
| Internal noise, μV | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
| External noise, μV | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.5 |
| Noise/Ration SNR, dB | 115 | 121 | 130 | 131 | 140 | 1120 | 129 | 120 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).