Submitted:
07 September 2024
Posted:
12 September 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Study Area and Period
Sample Collection
Microbiological Analysis
Statistical Analysis
Results
Results of Studied Samples from Taiz Government
Results of Studied Samples from Ibb Government
Discussion
Author Contributions
Data Availability
Consent for Publication
Competing Interests
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
References
- Adimalla, N.; Qian, H. Evaluation of non-carcinogenic causing health risks (NCHR) associated with exposure of fuoride and nitrate contaminated groundwater from semiarid region of south India. Enviro Sci Poll Resear. 2022, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ugwu, S.N.; Umuokoro, A.F.; Echiegu, E.A.; Ugwuishiwu, B.O.; Enweremadu, C.C. Comparative study of the use of natural and artifcial coagulants for the treatment of sullage (domestic wastewater). Cogent Engine. 2017, 4, 1365676–1365713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adimalla, N.; Manne, R.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Qian, H. Evaluation of groundwater quality and its suitability for drinking purposes in semi-arid region of Southern India: an application of GIS. Geo Inter. 2022, 37, 10843–10854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bekele, M.; Dananto, M.; Tadele, D. International Institute for applied research article number: se-. Appl Res J Enviro Engin. 2018, 1, 26–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adetunde, L.A.; Glover, R.L. Bacteriological Quality of Borehole Water Used by Students of University for Development Studies, Navrongo Campus in Upper-East Region of Ghana. Current Research Journal of Biological Sciences. 2010, 2, 361–364. [Google Scholar]
- Adimalla, N. Spatial distribution, exposure, and potential health risk assessment from nitrate in drinking water from semi-arid region of South India. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An Intern. J. 2020, 26, 310–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bote, M.E.; Desta, W.M. Removal of turbidity from domestic wastewater using electrocoagulation: optimization with response surface methodology. Chemistry Africa. 2022, 5, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ohanu, M.E.; Udoh, I.P.; Eleazar, C.I. Microbiological Analysis of Sachet and Tap Water in Enugu State of Nigeria. Advances in Microbiology 2012, 2, 547–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Hadheq, A.A.; Al-Ofairi, B.A.; Al-Helali, M.; Al-Mahbashi, A.; Al-Ghoury, A.; Al-Awar, M. The Incidence of Viral Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C Infections and Associated Risk Factors among Blood Donors in Amran Governorate, Yemen. Al-Razi Univ J Med Sci. 2022, 6, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mengstie, Y.A.; Desta, W.M.; Alemayehu, E. Assessment of Drinking Water Quality in Urban Water Supply Systems: The Case of Hawassa City, Ethio. Intern. J Anal. Chem. 3, 1–15. [CrossRef]
- World Health Organization. Water, sanitation, hygiene and health: a primer for health professionals., Geneva (WHO/CED/PHE/WSH/19.149). Licence: 2019; CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
- Charles P, Jan I, Pepper I, Maier M. Environmental microbiology. California: Academic press. 2000:491-5.
- Lansing M, Prescott, John P, Harely, Donald A, Klein. Microbiology. United State: Mc Graw Hill. 2005. 6th edition.P400.
- Ohanu, M.E.; Udoh, I.P.; Eleazar, C.I. Microbiological Analysis of Sachet and Tap Water in Enugu State of Nigeria. Adva. Micro. 2012, 2, 547–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Penna, V.T.; Martins, S.A.; Mazzola, P.G. Identification of bacteria in drinking and purified water during the monitoring of a typical water purification system. 2002, 2, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Al-Hadheq, A.A.; Al-Eryan, M.A.; Edrees, W.H.; Al-Nosary, T.A. Prevalence of Intestinal Parasitic Infections among Children Attending Some School in Amran Governorate, Yemen. J. Amr. Uni. 2023, 3, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahryari, A.; Smith, C.D.; Amini, A. Degradation of Bacterial Water Quality in Drinking Water after Bottling. The Open Micro. J. 2020, 14, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kouchesfahani, M.; Alimohammadi, M.; Nabizadeh, R.; Aslani, H.; Rezaie, S.; Asadian, S. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Heterotrophic Bacteria Count in Bottled Waters in Iran. Iran J Public Health 2015, 44, 1514–9. [Google Scholar]
- Moazeni, M.; Atefi, M.; Ebrahimi, A.; Razmjoo, P.; Vahid Dastjerdi, M. Evaluation of chemical and microbiological quality in 21 brands of Iranian bottled drinking waters in 2012: a comparison study on label and real contents. J Environ Public Health 2013, 469–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Health Organization and UNICEF. (2015); Update and MDG Assessment. Retrieved 22 February 22, from www.wssinfo.org.
- Lewandowski Z. and Beyenal H. Fundamentals of Biofilm Research. New York: CRC press. 2007; PP 103-109.
- Aldhamin, A. Evaluation of the quality of potable water in Al-Rusafa side, Baghdad. Iraq. Revis Bionat. 2023, 8, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shafique, N.; Mirza, A.I.; Hassan, M. Assessment of Drinking Water Quality Of Sheikhupura City. Intern. J Agricul. Susta. Develop. 2020, 2, 50–65. [Google Scholar]
- Hassan, N.A.; Mugbil, N.A.; Alballem, F.A. Biological Analysis of Drinking Water in some primary and secondary schools at Aden Governorate. Aden University Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences. 2008, 3, 509–516. [Google Scholar]
- Bin Hamed, A.; Bubakr, k. Assessment of Bacteriological Quality of Drinking Water in Some Primary and Secondary Schools in Mukalla City-Hadhramout/Yemen. Hadhramout University Journal of Natural & Applied Sciences. 2019, 16, 185–192. [Google Scholar]
- Yongyod, R.; et al. Microbiological Quality and Sanitation of Food Stalls and Drinking Water Vending Machines. Enviro. Natural Resour. J. 2023, 21, 20–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alfian, A.R.; Firdani, F.; Sari, P.N. Risk of Disease due to Contamination of Refile Drinkind Water Using Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment. Suranaree J. Sci. 2023, 30, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

| Water Sources | TBC ×10² per 100 mL | Fecal Bacteria/100 mL | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Samples | Mean | Coliform/ E. coli | E. Fecalis | |||
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | ||||
| Kalaba | 16 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| Al Dapab | 5 | 13 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Hoban | 15 | 18 | 20 | 18 | 0 | 0 |
| Regions | TBC ×10² per 100 mL | Effectiveness of Sterilization | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Before sterilization | After sterilization | ||
| Distribution Reservoir | 12 | 2 | 83.3% |
| Bab Mosa | 12 | 4 | 66.7% |
| Al-Shamasi | 12 | 2 | 83.3% |
| Al-markazi | 12 | 1 | 91.7% |
| Kalaba | 12 | 2 | 83.3% |
| Wells | Total Bacteria ×10² per 100 mL | Fecal Bacteria/100 mL | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Samples | Mean | Coliform/ E. coli | E. Fecalis | |||
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | ||||
| Al-Salaba | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Al-Mala'ab | 4 | 11 | 16 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Al-Segn Al-Markazi | 11 | 15 | 9 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| Seven | 10 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Eight | 7 | 5 | 10 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Region | Total Bacteria ×10² per 100 mL | Fecal Bacteria/100 mL | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Samples | Mean | Coliform/ E. coli | E. Fecalis | |||
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | ||||
| Alodain street | 31 | 19 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| Al-Madriah | 45 | 42 | 37 | 41 | 0 | 0 |
| Almohafadah | 16 | 13 | 21 | 16 | 0 | 0 |
| Mophleh line | 56 | 61 | 63 | 60 | 0 | 0 |
| Al-Wazeiah | 12 | 17 | 38 | 22 | 0 | 0 |
| Region | Total Bacteria ×10² per 100 mL | Fecal Bacteria/100 mL | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Samples | Mean | Coliform/ E. coli | E. Fecalis | |||
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | ||||
| Al-Segn Al-Markazi | 51 | 56 | 72 | 59 | 0 | 0 |
| Wadi Al-Dahab | 82 | 75 | 87 | 81 | 0 | 0 |
| Region | TBC ×10² per 100 mL | Fecal Bacteria/100 mL | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Samples | Mean | Coliform/ E. coli | E. Fecalis | |||
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | ||||
| Haratha | 55 | 58 | 64 | 59 | 0 | 0 |
| Dar Al-Sharaf | 42 | 38 | 54 | 44 | 0 | 0 |
| Akamt Easah | 63 | 54 | 71 | 62 | 0 | 0 |
| Region | Number of samples | Mean | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | |||||||
| TBC ×102 |
E.coli | TBC ×102 |
E.coli | TBC ×102 |
E.coli | TBC ×102 |
Coliform/ E. coli | E. fecalis | |
| Haratha | 85 | 16 | 82 | 18 | 73 | 11 | 80 | 15 | 0 |
| Dar Al-Sharaf | 65 | 23 | 81 | 29 | 69 | 10 | 71 | 21 | 0 |
| Akamt Easah | 59 | 12 | 67 | 14 | 70 | 20 | 65 | 15 | 0 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).