Submitted:
03 September 2024
Posted:
05 September 2024
Read the latest preprint version here
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
1.1. Special Case of f
- (1)
- The function f is everywhere surjective [1]
- (2)
1.2. Attempting to Analyze/Average F
- (1)
- The sequence of bounded functions is
- (2)
- The sequence of bounded functions converges to f: i.e.,
- (3)
- The generalized, satisfying extension of is : i.e., there exists a , where is finite
- (4)
-
There exists where the expected value of and are finite and non-equivelant: i.e.,(Whenever (4) is true, (3) is non-unique.)
1.2.1. Blockquote
We want to find an unique, satisfying (§Section 3) extension of , on bounded functions to f which takes finite values only, such that the set of all f with this extension forms:
- (1)
- a prevalent [2] subset of
- (2)
2. Extending the Expected Value w.r.t the Hausdorff Measure
- (1)
- One way is defining a generalized, satisfying extension of the Hausdorff measure on all A with positive & finite measure which takes positive, finite values for all Borel A. This can theoretically be done in the paper “A Multi-Fractal Formalism for New General Fractal Measures"[3] by taking the expected value of f w.r.t the extended Hausdorff measure.
- (2)
- Another way is finding a generalized, satisfying average of all A in the fractal setting. This can be done with the papers “Analogues of the Lebesgue Density Theorem for Fractal Sets of Reals and Integers" [4] and “Ratio Geometry, Rigidity and the Scenery Process for Hyperbolic Cantor Sets" [5] where we take the expected value of f w.r.t the densities in [4,5].
3. Attempt to Define “Unique and Satisfying" in The Blockquote of §Section 1.2
3.1. Note
- (1)
- (2)
- “Equivalent sequences of bounded functions" (§Section 5.2, def. 1)
- (3)
- “Nonequivalent sequences of bounded functions" (§Section 5.2, def. 2)
- (4)
- The “measure" of a property on a sequence of bounded functions which increases at rate linear or super-linear to that of “non-equivelant" sequences of bounded functions (§Section 5.3.1, §Section 5.3.2)
- (5)
- The “actual" rate of expansion on a sequence of bounded sets (§Section 5.4)
3.2. Leading Question
If we make sure to:
- (A)
- See Section 3.1 and (C)-(E) when something is unclear
- (B)
- Take all sequences of bounded functions which converge to f
- (C)
- Define C to be chosen center point of
- (D)
- Define E to be the chosen, fixed rate of expansion of a sequence on the graph of bounded functions
- (E)
- Define to be actual rate of expansion of a sequence on the graph of bounded functions (Section 5.4)
Does there exist a unique choice function which chooses a unique set of equivalent sequences of bounded functions where:
- (1)
- The chosen, equivelant sequences of bounded functions should satisfy (B).
- (2)
- The “measure" of the graph of all chosen, equivalent sequences of bounded functions which satisfy (B) should increase at a rate linear or superlinear to that of non-equivelant sequences of bounded functions satisfying (B)
- (3)
- The expected values, defined in the papers of §Section 2, for all equivalent sequences of bounded functions are equivalent and finite
- (4)
-
For the chosen, equivalent sequences of bounded functions satisfying (1), (2), and (3).
- The absolute difference between criteria (3) and the -th coordinate of C is the less than or equal to that of non-equivalent sequences of bounded functions satisfying (1), (2), and (3)
- The “rate of divergence" [6, p.275-322] of , using the absolute value , is less than or equal to that of non-equivalent sequences of bounded functions which satisfy (1), (2), and (3)
- (5)
-
When set is the set of all , where the choice function chooses all equivalent sequences of bounded functions satisfying (1), (2), (3) and (4), then Q is
- (a)
- a prevelant [2] subset of
- (b)
- (6)
- Out of all choice functions which satisfy (1), (2), (3), (4) and (5), we choose the one with the simplest form, meaning for each choice function fully expanded, we take the one with the fewest variables/numbers?
4. Question Regarding My Work
Is there a research paper which already solves the ideas I’m working on? (Non-published papers, such as mine [7], don’t count.)
5. Clarifying §Section 3
Is there a simpler version of the definitions below?
5.1. Defining Sequences of Bounded Functions Converging to f
For any there exists a sequence s.t. and (see [10] for info).
5.2. Defining Equivelant and Non-Equivelant Sequences of Bounded Functions
5.3. Defining the “Measure"
5.3.1. Preliminaries
- (1)
- For every , “over-cover" with minimal, pairwise disjoint sets of equal measure. (We denote the equal measures , where the former sentence is defined : i.e., enumerates all collections of these sets covering . In case this step is unclear, see §8.1.)
- (2)
- For every , r and , take a sample point from each set in . The set of these points is “the sample" which we define : i.e., enumerates all possible samples of . (If this is unclear, see §8.2.)
- (3)
-
For every , r, and ,
- (a)
- Take a “pathway” of line segments: we start with a line segment from arbitrary point of to the sample point with the smallest -dimensional Euclidean distance to (i.e., when more than one sample point has the smallest -dimensional Euclidean distance to , take either of those points). Next, repeat this process until the “pathway” intersects with every sample point once. (In case this is unclear, see §8.3.1.)
- (b)
- (c)
- Multiply remaining lengths in the pathway by a constant so they add up to one (i.e., a probability distribution). This will be denoted . (In case this is unclear, see §8.3.3)
- (d)
- (e)
-
Maximize the entropy w.r.t all "pathways". This we will denote:(In case this is unclear, see §8.3.5.)
- (4)
- Therefore, the maximum entropy, using (1) and (2) is:
5.3.2. What Am I Measuring?
- (a)
- (b)
- (1)
- If using and we have:then what I’m measuring from increases at a rate superlinear to that of .
- (2)
- If using equations and (swapping and , in and , with and ) we get:then what I’m measuring from increases at a rate sublinear to that of .
- (3)
-
If using equations , , , and , we both have:
- (a)
- or does not equal zero
- (b)
- or does not equal zero
then what I’m measuring from increases at a rate linear to that of .
5.4. Defining The Actual Rate of Expansion of Sequence of Bounded Sets
5.4.1. Definition of Actual Rate of Expansion of Sequence of Bounded Sets
5.5. Reminder
6. My Attempt At Answering The Blockquote of §Section 1.2.1
6.1. Choice Function
- (1)
- is the sequence of bounded functions which satisfies (1), (2), (3), (4) and (5) of the leading question in Section 3.2
- (2)
- is all sequences of bounded functions satisfying (1) of the leading question where the expected values, defined in the papers of Section 2, is finite.
- (3)
- is an element but not an element in the set of equivelant sequences of bounded functions to that of (def. 1), where using the end of def. 1, we represent this criteria as:
6.2. Approach
6.3. Potential Answer
6.3.1. Preliminaries (Infimum and Supremum of n-dimensional sets Using a Partial Order)
7. Questions
- (1)
- Does Section 6 answer the in Section 3.2
- (2)
- Using Section 1.1 and thm. 2, when the function , does have a finite value?
- (3)
- If there’s no time to check questions 1 and 2, see Section 4.
Appendix of §Section 5.3.1
8.1. Example of §Section 5.3.1, step 1
- (1)
- (2)
- When defining :
- (3)


8.2. Example of §Section 5.3.1, step 2

8.3. Example of §Section 5.3.1, step 3
- (1)
- (2)
- When defining :
- (3)
- (4)
- (5)
- (6)
- , using eq. 20, is:
8.3.1. Step 3a
- (1)
- is the next point in the “pathway" since it’s a point in with the smallest 2-d Euclidean distance to instead of .
- (2)
- is the third point since it’s a point in with the smallest 2-d Euclidean distance to instead of and .
- (3)
- is the fourth point since it’s a point in with the smallest 2-d Euclidean distance to instead of , , and .
- (4)
- we continue this process, where the “pathway" of is:
8.3.2. Step 3b

8.3.3. Step 3c
8.3.4. Step 3d
8.3.5. Step 3e
References
- Bernardi, C.; Rainaldi, C. Everywhere surjections and related topics: Examples and counterexamples. Le Matematiche 2018, 73, 71–88, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325625887_Everywhere_surjections_and_related_topics_Examples_and_counterexamples. [Google Scholar]
- Ott, W.; Yorke, J.A. Prevelance. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 2005, 42, 263–290, https://www.ams.org/journals/bull/2005-42-03/S0273-0979-05-01060-8/S0273-0979-05-01060-8.pdf. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Achour, R.; Li, Z.; Selmi, B.; Wang, T. A multifractal formalism for new general fractal measures. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 2024, 181, 114655, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0960077924002066. [Google Scholar]
- Bedford, T.; Fisher, A.M. Analogues of the Lebesgue density theorem for fractal sets of reals and integers. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 1992, 3, 95–124, https://www.ime.usp.br/~afisher/ps/Analogues.pdf. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bedford, T.; Fisher, A.M. Ratio geometry, rigidity and the scenery process for hyperbolic Cantor sets. Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems 1997, 17, 531–564, https://arxiv.org/pdf/math/9405217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sipser, M. Introduction to the Theory of Computation, 3 ed.; Cengage Learning, 2012; pp. 275–322.
- Krishnan, B. Bharath Krishnan’s ResearchGate Profile. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Bharath-Krishnan-4.
- Barański, K.; Gutman, Y.; Śpiewak, A. Prediction of dynamical systems from time-delayed measurements with self-intersections. Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées 2024, 186, 103–149, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021782424000345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caetano, A.M.; Chandler-Wilde, S.N.; Gibbs, A.; Hewett, D.P.; Moiola, A. A Hausdorff-measure boundary element method for acoustic scattering by fractal screens. Numerische Mathematik 2024, 156, 463–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- (https://math.stackexchange.com/users/5887/sbf), S. Convergence of functions with different domain. Mathematics Stack Exchange, [https://math.stackexchange.com/q/1063261]. https://math.stackexchange.com/q/1063261.
- John, R. Outlier. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outlier.
- M., G. Entropy and Information Theory, 2 ed.; Springer New York: New York [America];, 2011; pp. 61–95. https://ee.stanford.edu/~gray/it.pdf,. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).