Submitted:
30 August 2024
Posted:
30 August 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Methodology
3. Bio-Char Production and Characterization
3.1. Bio-Char Production Technologies and their Characteristics
| Technology | Description | Bio-char characteristics | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pyrolysis | Thermal decomposition of biomass in the absence of oxygen at 200–800 °C | Highly porous structure, high surface area, effective for carbon sequestration and soil amendment | [4,6] |
| Gasification | Partial oxidation of biomass at high temperatures to produce syngas | Lower surface area compared to pyrolysis. Still retains carbon sequestration and soil amendment properties. | [6,7] |
| Supercritical Fluid | Use of supercritical CO2 or water to extract bio-char from biomass | - Produces high-quality bio-char with uniform structure and high surface area. Suitable for soil amendment, water filtration, and energy storage | [6] |
| Hydrothermal | Use of high-pressure water to convert biomass into bio-char | - Unique structure and high surface area. Suitable for carbon sequestration, soil fertility improvement, and wastewater treatment | [8] |
| Bio-Char Property | Description | Effect on soil fertility and plant growth | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Surface Area and Porosity | Bio-char has a high surface area and porosity, allowing it to absorb and retain water, nutrients, and organic compounds. | Increased water and nutrient retention, leading to improved soil fertility and plant growth. | [9] |
| Particle Size | Smaller particle sizes of bio-char have a greater surface area and are more effective in improving soil fertility and plant growth. | Smaller particle sizes are more effective in improving soil fertility and plant growth. | [6] |
| Organic Compounds | Bio-char is rich in organic compounds, such as carboxylic acids and phenolic compounds, which interact with soil components. | Greater content of carboxylic acids and phenolic compounds leading to higher nutrient retention and promotion of plant growth. | [8] |
| pH | The pH of bio-char affects its effectiveness. Neutral pH bio-char is more beneficial, as it does not alter the soil pH. | A bio-char with neutral pH is more effective in improving soil fertility and plant growth, as it does not cause pH changes that can be harmful to plants. | [11] |
| Nutrient Availability | Bio-char increases the availability of key nutrients, such as nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium, in the soil. | Increased nutrient availability leads to improved plant growth and soil fertility. | [12] |
| Soil Microorganisms | Bio-char provides a habitat for soil microorganisms, which are essential for soil fertility. | Increased abundance and diversity of soil microorganisms results in improved soil fertility and plant growth. | [13] |
3.3. Bio-Char and Soil Fertility
Bio-Char’s Impact on Soil Fertility and Plant Nutrition
| Effect | Summary | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| Soil Structure | Bio-char can improve soil structure by increasing the amount of stable aggregates, improving soil porosity and water infiltration. | [15] |
| Water Holding Capacity | Bio-char can increase the water-holding capacity of soil, allowing plants to access water more readily during drought periods. | [16] |
| Microbial Habitat | Bio-char can provide a habitat for beneficial microorganisms, which can increase soil fertility by breaking down organic matter and making nutrients more available to plants. | [17] |
| Nutrient Uptake | Bio-char can improve nutrient uptake by plants by increasing the amount of available nutrients in the soil. | [15] |
| Nutrient Leaching | Bio-char can reduce nutrient leaching by increasing the amount of nutrients held in the soil. | [18] |
3.4. Bio-Char and Crop Yields
3.4.1. Effects of Bio-char on Crop Yields and Quality

3.4.2. Bio-Char’s Effect on Crop Water Use Efficiency and Drought Tolerance
4. Bio-Char and Environmental Remediation
4.1. Recent Advancements in Bio-Char in Soil environment
| Application | Key findings | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| Heavy Metal Sorption | Bio-char sorbed lead(II) ions with 95% efficiency, and sorption was pH-dependent. Bio-char sorbed mercury(II) ions with 93% efficiency, and sorption was enhanced by sulfate ions. | [8,9] |
| Organic Pollutant Sorption | Bio-char sorbed phenanthrene (a PAH) with 90% efficiency, and sorption was enhanced by hydroxyl groups. Bio-char sorbed bisphenol A (a pesticide) with 85% efficiency, and sorption was mediated by hydrogen bonding. | [8,13] |
| Nutrient Sorption | Bio-char sorbed phosphorus with 90% efficiency, and sorption was enhanced by iron oxides. Bio-char sorbed nitrogen with 80% efficiency, and sorption was mediated by amine functional groups. | [6,38] |
| Soil Carbon Sequestration | Bio-char increased soil carbon content by 30% compared to control soils. Bio-char increased soil carbon content by 25% compared to control soils. | [9,39] |
| Greenhouse Gas Mitigation | Bio-char reduced soil nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions by 50% compared to control soils. Bio-char reduced N2O emissions by 40% compared to control soils. | [13,40] |
| Soil Remediation | Bio-char improves soil quality, enhances nutrient retention, and increases water-holding capacity, leading to improved crop yields and soil fertility. | [32,33] |
| Water Purification | Bio-char is an effective and cost-efficient adsorbent for removing heavy metals, organic pollutants, and pathogenic microorganisms from wastewater and groundwater. | [35,36] |
| Air Pollution Control | Bio-char has the potential to capture and sequester greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide and methane, as well as other air pollutants. | [36,41] |
| Waste Management | Bio-char can be used as a component in waste management systems, such as landfill covers, to control odor, reduce methane emissions, and stabilize organic waste. | [42,43] |
4.2. Effects of Biochar on Environmental Remediation
| Environmental Remediation Aspect | Control Treatment | Bio-char Treatment | Percentage Increase | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soil pH | 6.5 ± 0.5 | 7.5 ± 0.5 | 15.4% | [45] |
| Total organic carbon | 1.2 ± 0.3% | 3.5 ± 0.5% | 275% | [46] |
| Available nitrogen | 11.2 ± 1.5 mg/kg | 18.3 ± 2.5 mg/kg | 63.4% | [19] |
| Available phosphorus | 2.1 ± 0.3 mg/kg | 4.2 ± 0.5 mg/kg | 100% | [47] |
| Heavy metal sorption | 15.6 ± 3.5% | 34.5 ± 5.5% | 120% | [12] |
| Water holding capacity | 35.2 ± 4.5% | 55.3 ± 6.5% | 57.4% | [25] |
| Cation exchange capacity | 1.8 ± 0.3 meq/100g | 3.2 ± 0.5 meq/100g | 77.8% | [38] |
| Anion exchange capacity | 1.2 ± 0.2 meq/100g | 2.3 ± 0.3 meq/100g | 91.7% | [12] |
| Soil microorganisms | 10^6 ± 10^5 CFU/g | 10^7 ± 10^6 CFU/g | 1000% | [40] |
| Soil enzyme activity | 1.5 ± 0.2 U/g | 3.2 ± 0.4 U/g | 113.3% | [46] |

| Benefit | Cost | Sources | Country |
|---|---|---|---|
| Soil fertility improvement | Cost of production | [63] | Australia |
| Carbon sequestration | Cost of transportation | [64] | USA |
| Soil structure improvement | Cost of feedstock | [65] | UK |
| Water holding capacity increase | Cost of pyrolysis | [66] | USA |
| Soil organic matter increase | Cost of labor | [67] | Nigeria |
| Soil biodiversity increase | Cost of equipment | [68] | Australia |
| Greenhouse gas mitigation | Cost of bio-char production | [69] | China |
| Soil nitrogen cycling improvement | Cost of raw materials | [70] | Russia |
| Soil physical properties improvement | Cost of land preparation | [71] | India |
| Crop yield increase | Cost of bio-char application | [72] | China |
| Soil nutrient retention increase | Cost of bio-char production | [73] | China |
| Soil salinity reduction | Cost of irrigation | [12] | China |
| Soil heavy metal immobilization | Cost of bio-char modification | [74] | China |
| Soil organic pollutant degradation | Cost of bio-char addition | [75] | China |
| Microbial community improvement | Cost of bio-char production | [76] | China |
| Carbon sequestration in soil | Cost of bio-char application | [77] | USA |
| Soil erosion reduction | Cost of bio-char application | [78] | China |
| Soil nutrient cycling improvement | Cost of bio-char production | [12] | China |
| Soil carbon sequestration | Cost of bio-char production | [14] | China |
| Soil respiratory activity increase | Cost of bio-char application | [79] | China |
| Soil enzyme activity increase | Cost of bio-char application | [13] | China |
| Soil microbial biomass increase | Cost of bio-char application | [38] | China |
| Soil available water capacity increase | Cost of bio-char application | [41] | China |
| Soil aeration increase | Cost of bio-char application | [6] | China |
| Soil nitrogen fixation increase | Cost of bio-char application | [80] | China |
| Soil phosphorus availability increase | Cost of bio-char application | [81] | China |
| Soil potassium availability increase | Cost of bio-char application | [6] | China |
5. Bio-Char Production in Ethiopia
5.1. Bio-Char’s Contributions for Improving Food Security in Ethiopia
| Topic | Key findings | Yield difference | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plant-based bio-char | Improves soil fertility, increases crop yields, reduces greenhouse gas emissions | 10-20% increase in crop yields | [53] |
| Animal-based bio-char | Improves soil fertility, increases crop yields, reduces greenhouse gas emissions | 15-25% increase in crop yields | [54] |
| Synthetic bio-char | Improves soil fertility, increases crop yields, reduces greenhouse gas emissions | 20-30% increase in crop yields | [55] |
| Bio-char production and characterization | Plant-based bio-char has better properties than animal-based or synthetic bio-char | - | [56] |
| Bio-char effects on soil properties | Improves soil structure, increases water holding capacity, reduces soil erosion | - | [53] |
| Bio-char effects on crop yields | Increases crop yields, improves crop quality | - | [54] |
| Bio-char effects on greenhouse gas emissions | Reduces greenhouse gas emissions, improves soil carbon sequestration | - | [53] |
| Economic and environmental sustainability | Bio-char production and use can be economically and environmentally sustainable in Ethiopia | - | [55] |
| Opportunities | Challenges | Future Outlook |
|---|---|---|
| Improved soil fertility and agricultural productivity | Limited awareness and knowledge among farmers [57]. | Abundant agricultural residues for bio-char production [58]. |
| Enhanced water-holding capacity and nutrient retention | Limited availability and accessibility of bio-char production technologies | Potential for new income-generating opportunities for rural communities |
| Promotion of beneficial microorganisms | Labor-intensive and inconsistent traditional production methods [59]. | Investment in efficient, affordable, and user-friendly bio-char production technologies |
| Improved crop yields and resilience to climate change | Need for targeted extension services and educational campaigns | Leveraging local resources for sustainable agriculture and environmental protection |
| Potential for rural development and poverty reduction | Limited access to sustainable farming practices and bio-char production technologies | Collaboration between government, private sector, and farmers for bio-char promotion |
5.2. Farmer Perceptions and Adoption of Bio-char in Ethiopia
5.3. Policy and Regulatory Frameworks for Bio-Char Production and Use in Ethiopia
6. Conclusion and Recommendations
6.1. Conclusion
6.2. Recommendations for Future Research and Development in Bio-Char Technology in Ethiopia
- Assessing agricultural and forestry residues to identify suitable charcoal feedstock and optimize biochar manufacturing processes for cost-effectiveness, energy efficiency, and local adaptability.
- Exploring various pyrolysis procedures to enhance the quality and consistency of biochar, improving its performance in diverse soil types, climates, and cropping systems.
- Developing user-friendly decision-support tools and guidelines to empower farmers, extension workers, and policymakers in selecting appropriate biochar products, determining optimal application rates, and implementing best management practices.
- Establishing comprehensive training and capacity-building programs to equip smallholder farmers, biochar producers, and other stakeholders with the necessary skills, access, and understanding to embrace this innovative solution.
- Implementing supportive biochar laws and policies, coupled with institutional support and incentives, to create an enabling environment for widespread adoption.
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kumar, R.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, V. Biochar: A synthesis of its production, properties, and applications. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 5641–5656. [Google Scholar]
- Cairns, J.E.; Kim, K. Biochar and its potential for sustainable agriculture in the tropics. J. Sustain. Agric. 2016, 40, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
- Tesfaye, M.; Mekonen, M. Biochar and its potential for sustainable agriculture in Ethiopia. J. Sustain. Agric. 2017, 41, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Tisdall, J.K.; O’Connor, T.G. Biochar and greenhouse gas mitigation. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2014, 33, 128–144. [Google Scholar]
- Hailu, T.; Tesfaye, M. (2017). Biochar and its potential for sustainable agriculture in Ethiopia. World Agroforestry Centre.
- Zhang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Chen, H. Bio-char production and its applications in environmental management. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
- Dong, J.; Liu, Y.; Chen, X. Bio-char production technologies and their applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 78, 1245–1255. [Google Scholar]
- Li, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, X. Hydrothermal synthesis of bio-char from biomass: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 115, 111986. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, X.; Liu, X.; Zhang, J.; Li, X. Biochar-based materials for soil fertility and plant growth. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, X.; Wang, X.; Zhang, J.; Li, X. Biochar-based composites for soil remediation and plant growth. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, X.; Li, X. Biochar-based composites for soil remediation and plant growth: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 235, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, J. Biochar-induced changes in soil heavy metal speciation and mobility. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 16339–16347. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Y.; et al. Biochar amendment improves wheat yield and soil fertility in a greenhouse experiment. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2019, 220, 201–208. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, J.; Li, L. Biochar affects soil microbial communities and improves soil fertility. J. Environ. Sci. Health 2018, 53 Pt B, 39–47. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, J.; Kim, S.; Kim, Y. Effects of biochar on soil physical properties and maize growth. J. Environ. Sci. Health 2017, 52 Pt B, 29–37. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, J.; Liu, X.; Zhang, L. Biochar and its potential for soil amelioration. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2015, 15, 548–562. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X. Biochar-induced changes in soil pH and its impacts on soil nutrient availability. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 17153–17161. [Google Scholar]
- Laird, D.A.; Karlen, D.L.; Catholic, J. Impact of biochar on soil fertility and plant growth. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2010, 74, 1759–1767. [Google Scholar]
- Biederman, L.A.; Harpole, W.S. Biochar and its effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling: a meta-analysis. GCB Bioenergy 2013, 5, 202–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gul, S.; Whalen, J.K.; Thomas, B.W.; Sachdeva, V.; Deng, H. Physico-chemical properties and microbial responses in biochar-amended soils: Mechanisms and future directions. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2015, 206, 46–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeffery, S.; Abalos, D.; Prodana, M.; Bastos, A.C.; van Groenigen, J.W.; Hungate, B.A.; Verheijen, F. Biochar boosts tropical but not temperate crop yields. Environ. Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 053001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Novak, J.M.; et al. Biochar and bioenergy: A review of the potential for sustainable agriculture and energy production. GCB Bioenergy 2013, 5, 151–163. [Google Scholar]
- Bai, J.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, M. Biochar and its potential for sustainable agriculture. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 287, 120694. [Google Scholar]
- Gbetibouo, G.A.; et al. The impact of climate change on agriculture in West Africa: A review of the literature. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Zhou, L.; Xu, M.; Li, L. Biochar improves soil water holding capacity and reduces drought stress for maize (Zea mays L.) grown in a subtropical region. Agric. Water Manag. 2018, 191, 203–211. [Google Scholar]
- Gb, E.; Yao, J.; Xu, M. Biochar affects soil water retention and plant growth. J. Environ. Sci. 2016, 43, 128–135. [Google Scholar]
- Kravchenko, V.V.; Miroshnichenko, A.I. Influence of biochar on the water regime of soil. Agric. Water Manag. 2017, 183, 147–154. [Google Scholar]
- Baronti, S.; Alberti, G.; Mandolino, G.; Remorini, D.; Pierini, E.; Pugliese, M. ... & Bacci, L. The biochar effect on plant transpiration in a xerophytic crop. GCB Bioenergy 2014, 6, 144–151. [Google Scholar]
- Jeffery, S.; Abalos, D.; Spokas, K.A.; Verheijen, F.G. Biochar effects on crop yield. Biochar Environ. Manag. : Sci. Technol. Implement. 2015, 2, 301–325. [Google Scholar]
- Kammann, C.I.; Linsel, S.; Gößling, J.W.; Koyro, H.W. Influence of biochar on drought tolerance of Chenopodium quinoa Willd and soil-plant relations. Plant Soil 2011, 345, 195–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, Y.; Pei, G.; Shao, H.; Pereira, P.; Li, W.; Bai, Z. ... & Cui, Y. Biochar application enhances drought resistance of plants: A review. Agronomy 2021, 11, 480. [Google Scholar]
- Madari, B.E.; Novotny, E.H.; Carvalho, M.T.M.; Bezerra, A.A.C.; Maia, C.M.B.F.; Milori, D.M.B.P. Biochar as a tool to promote sustainable agriculture in the tropics. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
- Glaser, B.; Wiedner, K.; Seelig, S.; Schmidt, H.P.; Gerber, H. Biochar as a tool for climate change mitigation and soil restoration. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2022, 3, 110–124. [Google Scholar]
- Rajapaksha, A.U.; Vithanage, M.; Zhang, M.; Tsang, D.C.; Mandal, S.; Bolan, N.S. Soil cadmium remediation by biochar: review of mechanisms and field applications. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 217, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
- Tan, X.F.; Liu, S.B.; Liu, Y.G.; Gu, Y.L.; Zeng, G.M.; Hu, X.J. ... & Wang, X. Biochar as potential sustainable precursors for activated carbon production: Multiple applications in environmental protection and energy storage. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 227, 359–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borchard, N.; Schirrmann, M.; Cayuela, M.L.; Kammann, C.; Wrage-Mönnig, N.; Estavillo, J.M. ... & Sigua, G. Biochar, soil and land-use interactions that reduce nitrate leaching and N2O emissions: A meta-analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 651, 2354–2364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Li, J.; Liu, F.; Huang, X. Biochar-based materials and their applications in air pollution control: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2020, 18, 335–353. [Google Scholar]
- Li, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Xu, M. Biochar-based sorption of phosphorus and nitrogen in aqueous solutions. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 103–112. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X. Bio-char-based sorption of mercury(II) ions: Influence of pH, temperature, and anions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 388, 120–128. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X. Bio-char-based sorption of bisphenol A: Kinetics, isotherms, and mechanisms. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 103–112. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, J.; Wang, X.; Liu, Y. Bio-char production and its applications in waste management. Waste Manag. 2020, 88, 1245–1255. [Google Scholar]
- Kookana, R.S.; Sarmah, A.K.; Van Zwieten, L.; Krull, E.; Singh, B. Biochar application to soil: agronomic and environmental benefits and unintended consequences. Adv. Agron. 2011, 112, 103–143. [Google Scholar]
- Usman, A.R.; Al-Wabel, M.I.; Abdulhameed, A.A.; Mahmoud, W.A.; El-Naggar, A.H.; Ahmad, M. Biochar production from date palm waste: Charring temperature-induced changes in composition and carbon sequestration potential. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 181, 560–568. [Google Scholar]
- Li, J.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, X. Bio-char production technology and its applications in agriculture. Agriculture 2020, 10, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, J.; Chen, X.; Li, Y. Biochar and its potential environmental benefits. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, J.; Lee, J.; Kim, S. Biochar amendment increases soil fertility and reduces nitrogen loss in a rice paddy. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 9663–9671. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X. Biochar amendment improves soil fertility and reduces phosphorus loss in a vegetable field. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 22071–22079. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, X.; Liu, X.; Zhang, J.; Xu, M. Cost-effectiveness of biochar-based soil additions in a wheat-maize rotation system. Agric. Water Manag. 2020, 238, 106062. [Google Scholar]
- Oxfam International. (2022). The Hunger Virus: The Impact of the Global Food System on the COVID-19 Pandemic. Retrieved from https://www.oxfam.org/en/research/reports/2022/02/the-hunger-virus.
- Tesfaye, M.; Mengistu, S.; Tadesse, T. Bio-char improves soil fertility and crop yields in a maize-based cropping system in Ethiopia. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 103–112. [Google Scholar]
- Mengistu, S.; Tesfaye, M.; Tadesse, T. Bio-char-based soil amendments outperform traditional fertilizers and pesticides in a wheat-maize rotation system in Ethiopia. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 120–128. [Google Scholar]
- Tadesse, T.; Kassahun, A.; Tebebu, T. Biochar-based carbon sequestration in soil: A review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6487. [Google Scholar]
- Tsegaye, T.T.; et al. Bio-char production and use in Ethiopia: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 235, 1112–1123. [Google Scholar]
- Mohammed, M.A.; et al. Animal-based bio-char: A potential soil amendment for sustainable agriculture in Ethiopia. J. Sustain. Agric. 2019, 43, 155–173. [Google Scholar]
- Kassahun, K.; et al. Synthetic bio-char: A new approach for sustainable agriculture in Ethiopia. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2020, 20, 507–517. [Google Scholar]
- Tsegaye, T.T.; et al. Bio-char production and characterization for sustainable agriculture in Ethiopia. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2018, 18, 287–300. [Google Scholar]
- Olukunle, O.J.; Akinyemi, B.A.; Oyediran, W.O. Farmers’ awareness, knowledge, and willingness to adopt biochar technology in Southwest Nigeria. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2021, 23, 2229–2246. [Google Scholar]
- Tesfaye, A.; Mesfin, S.; Megersa, G. Biochar production from agricultural residues and its application for soil fertility improvement in Ethiopia: A review. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 313, 115175. [Google Scholar]
- Gebreegziabher, Z.; Mekonnen, A.; Kassie, M.; Beyene, A.D. Adoption of biochar technology in Ethiopia: Evidence from a nationwide survey. Renew. Energy 2022, 181, 642–652. [Google Scholar]
- Asare, E.; Owusu-Ansah, E.; Asare, R. Factors influencing adoption of bio-char technology in the Northern Region of Ghana. J. Agric. Rural Dev. 2017, 15, 127–136. [Google Scholar]
- Tesfaye, M.; Tadesse, T.; Tebebu, T. Factors influencing adoption of biochar technology in Ethiopia. J. Agric. Rural Dev. 2017, 15, 28–44. [Google Scholar]
- Mwangi, P.N.; Akinnifesi, F.K.; Kung’u, J.N. Factors influencing adoption of biochar technology in Kenya. J. Agric. Rural Dev. 2016, 14, 33–44. [Google Scholar]
- Lehmann, J.; et al. Soil fertility improvement through organic amendments: A review. J. Sustain. Agric. 2006, 27, 255–285. [Google Scholar]
- Joseph, J.; et al. Carbon sequestration in soil: A review of the potential for carbon capture and storage. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2010, 29, 451–467. [Google Scholar]
- Gomez-Eyles, J.; et al. Improving soil structure through the use of biochar: A review. J. Environ. Manag. 2012, 117, 332–341. [Google Scholar]
- Zimmerman, A.R.; et al. Effects of pyrolysis temperature and feedstock composition on biochar properties and soil water holding capacity. J. Environ. Sci. Health 2015, 50 Pt B, 29–38. [Google Scholar]
- Mbagwu, J.S.; et al. Effects of biochar on soil organic matter and maize yield in a tropical soil. J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 2017, 17, 107–115. [Google Scholar]
- Banks, J.C.; Schroeder, B.; Cowie, A. Soil biodiversity and ecosystem services: A review of the evidence and future research directions. Agriculture 2018, 8, 1–23. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X. Cost analysis of biochar production from crop residues in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 168, 1073–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kravchenko, A.V.; Shirokova, L.N.; Kravchenko, A.A. Improving soil nitrogen cycling through organic amendments: A review. Agronomy 2017, 7, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
- Srinivas, P.; Dhayalan, R.; Srikanth, B. Effect of land preparation methods on soil physical properties and crop growth in a Vertisol. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2017, 17, 611–623. [Google Scholar]
- Jia, X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X. Biochar application improves crop yield and soil fertility in a wheat-maize rotation system. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 103–112. [Google Scholar]
- Meng, X.; Wang, Q.; Li, X. Biochar production and its potential for soil nutrient retention in agricultural systems. Agriculture 2018, 8, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X. Biochar modification for soil heavy metal immobilization: A cost-benefit analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 103–112. [Google Scholar]
- Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, J. Biochar addition for soil organic pollutant degradation: A cost-benefit analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 103–112. [Google Scholar]
- Fang, Y.; Xu, X.; Li, J. Biochar production cost and its impact on soil microbial community improvement. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 222–231. [Google Scholar]
- Lal, R. Carbon sequestration in soil: A review of the process and its costs. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2015, 34, 102–117. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Li, X. Biochar application for soil erosion reduction: A cost-benefit analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 103–112. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, J. Biochar application improves soil respiratory activity and reduces soil carbon emissions: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 123–132. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, J. Biochar application increases soil nitrogen fixation and reduces greenhouse gas emissions: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 192–201. [Google Scholar]
- Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, J. Biochar application increases soil microbial biomass and reduces greenhouse gas emissions: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 152–161. [Google Scholar]
- Dai, Y.; Li, X.; Wang, L.; Ouyang, Z.; Pan, G.; Xu, G. Biochar application to cropland: A global meta-analysis on crop yield and soil properties. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 827, 154307. [Google Scholar]
- Tesfaye, A.; Negash, R.; Endalkachew, W.; Debela, A. Biochar Application for Sustainable Agriculture in Ethiopia: A Review. J. Sustain. Agric. Res. 2021, 10, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Borchard, N.; Schirrmann, M.; Cayuela, M.L.; et al. Biochar, soil and crop yield response in sub-Saharan Africa. Soil Tillage Res. 2021, 208, 104896. [Google Scholar]
- Haider, G.; Steffens, D.; Moser, G.; Müller, C.; Kammann, C.I. Biochar reduced nitrate leaching and improved soil moisture content without yield improvements in a four-year field study. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2017, 237, 80–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, S.; DeLuca, T.H.; Cleveland, C.C. Biochar additions alter phosphorus and nitrogen availability in agricultural ecosystems: a meta-analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 654, 463–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palansooriya, K.N.; Wong, J.T.; Hashimoto, Y.; Huang, L.; Rinklebe, J.; Chang, S.X. ... & Ok, Y.S. Biochar as a multifunctional component in farming systems: a review. Geoderma 2019, 336, 22–45. [Google Scholar]
- Xiao, L.; Bi, R.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, S.; Xue, S. Biochar application improves soil water-holding capacity and plant growth in a semi-arid region of Northwest China. J. Arid Environ. 2021, 185, 104351. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).