Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

The Influence of Different Hydrothermal Processes Used in the Preparation of Brussels Sprouts on the Availability of Glucosinolates to Humans

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

06 August 2024

Posted:

08 August 2024

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Cruciferous vegetables represent a valuable source of bioactive compounds. However, there is currently a paucity of information regarding the extent to which these compounds remain bioavailable to the body following thermal treatment and digestion processes within the digestive tract. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of heat treatment and in vitro digestion on the level of selected bioactive compounds in Brussels sprouts. The Brussels sprouts samples were subjected to a range of thermal processing techniques, which were then followed by a simulated in vitro digestion. The investigated compounds were analysed using UV-Vis spectrometry and liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (LC-MS). The findings revealed that the sous-vide method of cooking Brussels sprouts resulted in significantly higher losses of glucosinolates (GLS) in comparison to conventional cooking methods. No significant differences were observed with regard to isothiocyanates and indoles. The analysis of GLS following digestion revealed that the process was more effective after sous vide and traditional cooking, and slightly less effective after steam cooking. With regard to individual compounds, glucoraphanin (GRA), glucoraphenin (GIV) and gluconasturtiin (GNS) were found to be completely degraded, whereas methoxyglucobrassicin (metGBS) was the most resistant to digestion in both the sous vide and steamed Brussels sprouts. The results indicated that the process of simulating digestion had no significant effect on isothiocyanates and indoles. This suggests that, if present in the heat-treated samples, these compounds remained stable during the in vitro digestion procedure.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Brassica vegetables are a globally consumed food crop, comprising numerous species and varieties, including kale, broccoli, cabbage, cauliflower, and Brussels sprouts [1]. The consumption of Brassica vegetables has been linked to a reduced risk of developing chronic diseases, including cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, obesity and possibly certain types of cancer [2]. Within plant foods, cruciferous vegetables have been increasingly included in dietary recommendations due to their capacity to deliver health-promoting nutrients and compounds, with glucosinolates (GLS) representing a particularly notable example.
Although glucosinolates lack direct health-beneficial properties, they can be converted by the enzyme myrosinase, which is naturally present in plants, into other compounds that may have beneficial effects on human health. This conversion occurs when the glucosinolates are broken down by chewing or cutting raw vegetables [1,3]. Hydrolysis products include, among others, isothiocyanates, thiocyanates, nitriles and indoles, which are biologically active compounds with anticancer properties [2].
The majority of cruciferous vegetables, particularly Brussels sprouts (B. oleracea (L.) var. gemmifera), are rarely consumed raw and require further heat treatment prior to ingestion. Conventional cooking methods, including steaming and the utilization of novel processing techniques such as hydrothermal sous vide treatment, have been demonstrated to significantly influence the biochemical composition of cruciferous vegetables [4,5]. Nevertheless, research based on food composition alone is inadequate to ascertain the concentrations of individual components that are ultimately available to the human body following digestion. When vegetables are consumed, the human digestive tract exposes vegetable products to various conditions (e.g. pH changes, enzymes, electrolytes, mechanical disintegration) which can affect the stability and bioaccessibility of their compounds. Consequently, the bioaccessibility of brassica vegetables must be taken into consideration when evaluating their nutritional value. The term can be defined as that proportion of a micronutrient or bioactive compound that remains soluble within the intestine lumen following a simulated gastrointestinal digestive process, wherein the physiologic conditions of the stomach and small intestine are accurately replicated [6]. In vitro digestion models are cost-effective, easy to control, and independent of physiological effects. Furthermore, they exhibit excellent reproducibility and can provide a reliable approximation of in vivo digestion [1].
Nevertheless, to date, the majority of studies on in vitro digestion have concentrated on fresh vegetables. Consequently, there is a deficiency of knowledge regarding the impact of heat treatment on the bioavailability of phytochemicals. Therefore, given that Brussels sprouts are one of the richest sources of glucosinolates [7], the objective of this study was to assess the impact of heat treatment and in vitro digestion on the levels of selected bioactive compounds in Brussels sprouts. We hypothesized that the type of thermal processing method could influence on the level of glucosinolates, isothiocyanates and indoles. It was also assumed that the type of thermal treatment would affect the degree of digestion of the analyzed compounds and their final bioavailability.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Material

The analysis was conducted on Brussels sprouts procured from a local supermarket (Cracow, Poland) in 2019. A batch of Brussels sprouts (2 kg raw weight, in triplicate) was subjected to pre-cleaning and divided into four sub-samples. Three sub-samples underwent hydrothermal treatment. These included traditional boiling (B; n = 3), steaming (S; n = 3), and sous-vide (SV; n = 3). Additionally, one sample remained raw and was not subjected to thermal treatment (R; n = 3). The parameters of the hydrothermal treatment (time, temperature, and water ratio) were optimized in previous studies based on color and sensorial analyses, dry matter, protein, fat, ash, total dietary fiber, and soluble fraction content. All hydrothermal treatments were carried out until consumable softness was reached, as determined by texturometer EZ Test X (Schimadzu’s, Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands).
Conventional cooking was conducted in stainless steel dishes using an induction hob (Hendi, Hamburg, Germany). The cooking temperature was set at 98 ± 1 °C, and the cooking time was 15 minutes. The raw material-to-water ratio was 1:3 (m:V). This ratio was maintained throughout the boiling process by covering the pot. This was done to prevent water evaporation.
Steamed vegetables were prepared in a Retigo Orange Version 6 × GN1/1|O 611 in combi steamer (Retigo, Rožnov pod Radhoštěm, Czech Republic) at 100 °C for seven minutes.
Subsequently, sous vide cooking was conducted by vacuum packing the samples (using a vacuum packer, VBN-4, RM Gastro, Veselí nad Lužnicí, Czech Republic) at 90 °C for approximately 45–50 minutes, utilizing the Sous vide 225 448 system (Hendi, Hamburg, Germany). Following the completion of this stage of the experiment, all samples were subjected to a process of cryogenic freezing at a temperature of -20 ± 2 °C (blast chilling chamber, RedFox SHS-511, RM Gastro, Veselí nad Lužnicí, Czech Republic). Subsequently, the frozen vegetables were subjected to lyophilization, which was accomplished using a Christ Alpha 1-4 lyophilizer (Martin Christ Gefriertrocknungsanlagen GmbH, Osterode am Harz, Germany), and ground in a Tecator Knifetec 1095 laboratory mill (Foss Tecator, Uppsala, Sweden) in order to obtain a homogeneous material. This material was stored under refrigeration in hermetically sealed containers until it was utilized for chemical analyses.

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Dry Matter

Dry matter content was analyzed using the dry-weighing method according to PN-ISO 712:2002 [8] with the use of a Venticell 55Plus dryer (BMT, Brno-stˇred, Czech Republic).

2.2.2. In Vitro Digestion

The in vitro digestion procedure was carried out in accordance with the methodology presented by other authors [9], with the exception that a modification was made [10]. In brief, 0.5 g of homogenized plant material was placed in syringes, with distilled water subsequently added and mixed. Subsequently, 0.5 M HCl was acidified to a pH of 2, and a pepsin solution (concentration 6 mg/mL; activity 3850 U/mg; Sigma (P6887); dissolved in 0.1 M HCl) was added. Distilled water was then added, and the resulting solution was incubated at 37 °C for 2 h (in vitro digestion gastric fragment). After this, 1 M NaHCO3 was added in a volume providing a pH of 7 and a bile and pancreatin solution (bile and pancreatin concentrations of 90 mg/mL and 9 mg/mL, respectively; bile (The Sigma-Aldrich B8631 (St. Louis, MO, USA) was dissolved in 0.1 M NaHCO3 and pancreatin (Sigma-Aldrich P7545; specific activity: 4 × USP specifications). The solution was then redissolved in redistilled water (in vitro digestion intestinal fragment) and mixed before being transferred to dialysis bags (Sigma-Aldrich D9777-100FT, dialysis tubing cellulose membrane). The containers were then closed and placed in the imidazole buffer solution (3.4 g of imidazole (Sigma-Aldrich 792527) dissolved in 250 mL of redistilled water, pH adjusted to pH 7.0; supplemented with 11.688 g of NaCl anhydrous and redistilled water to 2 dm3). Subsequently, the flasks were placed in a shaking water bath (40 rpm, GFL 1092) and incubated for 2 h at 37 °C. The obtained dialysates were stored at −22 ± 1 °C in tightly closed, airtight containers. After freezing, the vegetables were immediately lyophilized and used for further analyses.

2.2.3. Determination of Glucosinolates

The glucosinolates (GLS) were determined as desulfoglucosinolates according to the standard ISO 9167 procedure [11]. However, in order to accommodate for the modifications to this procedure proposed by Kusznierewicz et al. [12], a further modification to the identification of GLS was implemented. The freeze-dried plant material (0.2 g) was extracted on two separate occasions using boiling methanol (70%, 3 mL).
Subsequently, the supernatants were collected and combined after centrifugation (5000 rpm, 10 min, 4°C). The extract, comprising approximately 6 mL, was then loaded onto a column containing 1 mL of a suspension of DEAE Sephadex A-25 anion exchange resin (Sigma Chemical), which had been pre-washed with 2 mL of imidazole formate (6 M) and twice with 1 mL of water. Then, the water solution of sulphatase (Helix pomatia type H1, Sigma Chemical, 1 mg/mL, 250 µL) was added to the column. On the following day, the desulfo-glucosinolates (DS-GLS) were eluted with water (1 mL) and injected (30 µL) into the UltiMate 3000 UPLC system (Thermo Scientific Dionex), which consisted of a quaternary pump, well plate autosampler, and column compartment. The system was equipped with a SynergiTM Hydro-RP 80 Å column (150 x 4.6 mm, 4 μm, Phenomenex) and a PDA detector, coupled with a high-resolution Thermo Q-ExactiveTM Focus quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo, Bremen, Germany). The mobile phase consisted of water (A) and a 20:80 (v/v) mixture of acetonitrile and water (B) both components of which contained 5 mM ammonium formate and 0.01% (v/v) formic acid. The chromatographic resolution was conducted at 30°C with a flow rate of 1 mL/min and a gradient program comprising a linear increase from 5 to 100% B over 25 minutes, followed by isocratic separation with 100% B for 5 minutes. The chromatographic peaks were initially detected with PAD at 229 nm, and then the identity of individual DS-GLS was confirmed via ESI-HRMS. The parameters employed in the negative ion acquisition mode of the HESI apparatus were as follows: sheath gas flow rate, 35 arb; auxiliary gas flow rate, 15 arb; sweep gas flow rate, 3 arb; spray voltage, 2.5 kV; capillary temperature, 350°C; S-lens RF level, 50; and heater temperature, 300°C. The full MS scan was configured as follows: resolution, 70,000 FWHM; AGC target, 2e5; maximum injection time, 100 ms; and scan range, 120–1200 m/z. The data-dependent MS2 parameters were: resolution, 17,500 FWHM; isolation window, 3.0 m/z; collision energy, 30 eV; AGC target, 2e5; max inject time, 100 ms. The data were analysed with Xcalibur 4.1 software (ThermoFisher Scientific). The glucotropaeolin (GTL) (AppliChem) was employed as an internal standard to quantify the GLS level in each sample, in accordance with the ISO protocol [11]. The resulting chromatographic and spectrometric data, along with the associated chromatograms, are presented in Table 1 and Figure 1.

2.2.4. Determination of Indoles and Isothiocyanates

Brussels sprout freeze-dried extracts (0.4 g) were prepared in phosphate buffer (0.01 M, pH=7.4, 10 mL) and then incubated for 3 hours at 37°C to allow for the possible action of endogenous myrosinase. For each sample, three independent extractions and analyses were conducted. The obtained extracts were purified and enriched using the SPE technique according to the conditions described by Seljåsen et al. [13]. The obtained SPE eluate were divided into three portions. One of the samples was subjected to an analysis of its indole content in accordance with the methodology outlined by Pilipczuk et al. [14]. The two remaining portions of the eluate were used to determine individual isothiocyanate (ITC) in the form of conjugates with N-acetyl-l-cysteine (NAC) and to determine the total content of ITC reacted with 1,2-benzenedithiol (BDT) to 1,3-benzenedithiole-2-thione (BDTT) according to the procedure and conditions described by Pilipczuk et al. [15]. The identity of analytes was confirmed via ESI-HRMS (Thermo Q-ExactiveTM Focus quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer) based on specific ions (Table 1, Figure 2). The HESI parameters in positive acquisition was the same as described for GLS determination. The quantification of the analytes was conducted using external calibration curves. In the case of indolic compounds their contents in plant extracts were calculated using calibration line of standard indole-3-carbinol (I3C) (Sigma, Steinheim, Germany) and expressed as I3C equivalents (linear range, 0.02-10 nmol/mL; standard curve, y=152.59x - 0.0033; r2=0.990; limit of detection (LOD), 0.001 nmol/mL; limit of quantification (LOQ), 0.003 nmol/mL). The calibration curve used for quantification of total ITC in plant samples were generated by the integration of the area of absorption peak of BDTT determined during analyses of serial dilutions of phenylethyl isothiocyanate standard (Sigma, Steinheim, Germany) mixed and incubated with BDT (linear range, 0.01-0.4 μmol/mL; standard curve, y=2956x + 9.25; r2=0.998; LOD, 0.002 µmol/mL; LOQ, 0.006 µmol/mL).

2.2.5. Bioaccessibility

The bioaccessibility of glucosinolates, isothiocyanates and indoles was assessed as the ratio of bioaccessible amount of the component after in vitro digestion to the total amount of this component before in vitro digestion, expressed in % [4].

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The data were subjected to a statistical analysis, which entailed the application of one-way ANOVA, followed by the Tukey’s post-hoc test or the Kruskal-Wallis test in instances where the data did not meet the requisite assumptions. The significance of the results was determined through the application of a p-value cut-off of <0.05. All analyses were performed using the Statistica 13.0 software, developed by Stat-Soft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA.

3. Results

Table 2 presents the content of GLS and their degradation products in raw and thermally processed Brussels sprouts. The total glucosinolate content in raw Brussels sprouts was 15.05 µmol/g d.w. (dry weight), which equates to 239.7 µmol/100 g f.w. (fresh weight). The two main glucosinates identified in the raw sample were aliphatic GLS sinigrin and indole GLS glucobrassicin, with levels of 4.78 µmol/g d.w. and 3.75 µmol/g d.w. (76.1 µmol/100 g f.w. and 59.8 µmol/100 g f.w.), respectively. The total GLS content of the samples after heat treatment ranged from 13.26 µmol/g d.w. (199.5 µmol/100 g f.w., sous vide) to 17.65 µmol/g d.w. (267.6 µmol/100 g f.w., conventional cooking).
The most abundant isothiocyanates in the raw material were 3-butenyl-ITC (BITC), followed by iberin and 2-propenyl-ITC. All of these compounds were present at levels of approximately 0.3 µmol/g d.w., resulting in a total sum of ITC of 0.91 µmol/g d.w. The fourth ITC analyzed, sulpharane, was identified in much lower amounts (0.035 µmol/g d.w.). In the case of indoles, only tryptophan (Trp), β-glucoside (BG) and indole-3-acetonitrile (I3ACN) were identified in the Brussels sprout samples. The total sum of indoles ranged from 0.106 µmol/g d.w. (steam) to 0.128 µmol/g d.w. (sous vide method).
The levels of the investigated compounds after simulated digestion were generally lower, with some exceptions (Table 2). The total GLS content was reduced approximately tenfold, and some compounds were completely degraded. The levels of isothiocyanates analysed by the Zhang method also decreased, while the content of indoles remained at the same level.

4. Discussion

4.1. Stability of Glucosinolates and Its Metabolites during Thermal Processing

The glucosinolate-myrosinase system in Brassica plants can undergo thermal changes at multiple levels as a result of heating or cooking. High temperatures can lead to the complete or partial inactivation of myrosinase, the penetration of glucosinolates or their metabolites into the cooking medium, the loss of enzymatic cofactors and the thermal degradation or volatilization of metabolites [16].
In the initial phase of the experiment, samples of Brussels sprouts were subjected to three distinct thermal treatments, including conventional cooking, steaming and sous vide, and then analyzed to determine the content of glucosinolates and their metabolites. Eight glucosinolates were identified and quantified. These included six aliphatic methionine-derived compounds, two indolic tryptophan-derived compounds and one aromatic phenylalanine-derived compound. The glucosinolates identified were: glucoiberin, progoitrin, glucoraphanin, sinigrin, gluconapin and glucoibervein, as well as glucobrassicin and 4-methoxyglucobrassicin. Gluconaatrurtiin was identified as a single, aromatic phenylalanine-derived compound. The total GLS content and the proportions of the different GLSs in raw Brussels sprouts were found to be consistent with the data found in the literature. It is important to note, however, that the presence of GLSs is influenced by numerous additional factors, including soil characteristics, seasonal variations, genetic predisposition, and interactions between elements and anthropogenic pollution [17]. For instance, in our previous study, the total GLS sum reached a comparable level (215 µmol/100 g f.w.), whereas Ciska et al. [18] reported a markedly higher GLS content in raw Brussels sprouts (498 µmol/100 g f.w.). Sinigrin and glucobrassicin were also identified as the most prevalent glucosinolates in Brussels sprouts in other studies [7,19].
The glucosinolate levels (GLS) of the samples were found to vary significantly in their susceptibility to thermal degradation. No statistically significant differences were found when comparing the total GLS results obtained in the heat-treated samples and in the raw product. However, a statistically higher total glucosinolate content was observed in the conventionally cooked product compared to the sous vide method. Furthermore, variable behavior of the substances was observed under the influence of the different heat treatment methods, with the individual compounds exhibiting varying responses to the different heat treatment methods. In general, the content of compounds remained unchanged after sous vide treatment, with the exception of GNA and PRO, which decreased by 35% and 25% respectively, and metGBS, which increased by 284%. Steaming only caused a statistically significant decrease in the content of GNA, by 20%, and an increase in the content of metGBS, by 423%. Conventional cooking resulted in increased glucosinolate content, specifically GIB (117%), GBS (150%) and metGBS (437%). These findings confirmed those of a previous study [20] which demonstrated that cooking Brussels sprouts by the sous-vide method resulted in significantly higher losses of glucosinolates, both indole and aliphatic, compared to conventional cooking.
The increase in the levels of certain GLSs has already been observed by other authors. It is possible that the increase in total GLS content is due to thermal degradation of plant tissues, resulting in more effective chemical extraction of GLS from processed samples than from raw material. This also suggests that the standard method, which uses 70% methanol at 70 °C, does not support sufficient extraction of GLS from raw vegetables. Consequently, the GLS content of fresh vegetables may be underestimated [18]. Therefore, the results obtained by others may differ significantly depending on the method used to prepare the samples. Previous research has indicated that boiling can result in a reduction in GLS content, with observed decreases of up to 90% [21]. However, in several experiments, thermal treatment of Brassica species by, for example, steaming, did not result in a significant decrease in glucosinolate concentrations [16].
The observed variation in loss has been attributed to the differing chemical structures and thermal labilities of aliphatic and indole glucosinolates [18]. However, in this experiment, no differences were found between aliphatic and the three other GLS when analyzing the changes during heat treatment.
Following cell disruption, glucosinolates can be converted by myrosinase into isothiocyanates and indoles, some of which have health-promoting properties [22]. As an illustrative example, glucobrassicin is hydrolyzed to the unstable indole-3-methylisothiocyanate (I3M), which spontaneously decomposes into indole-3-acetonitrile (IAN) under the appropriate conditions. Conversely, I3C and 3-butenyl ITC derive from sinigrin and gluconapin, respectively [19]. In order to achieve this, the content of the individual isothiocyanates and indoles was determined in all products (raw material and after thermal processing). The presence of the four isothiocyanates analyzed by the ITC-NAC method was found only in the raw Brussels sprouts, which could indicate that they were degraded by the heat treatment. In contrast, the ITC (expressed as total ITC content) analyzed by the Zhang method was detected in all products, including those after heat processing, but their levels did not differ statistically from the raw product. Additionally, no differences in ITC values were observed between the various heat processing methods. The total ITC content obtained by this technique was comparable to the ITC-NAC method and was equal to 0.9 µmol/g d.w., which is in good agreement with the value reported by Sun et al. [23] of approximately 1 µmol/g d.w. Among the indoles, only three compounds were detected and their levels were not statistically different.
Previous experiments have reported various changes in ITC during the processing of Brussels sprouts. It was observed that there was a relatively high abundance of ITC present in boiled Brussels sprouts [7]. Of these, the allyl ITC and 3-butenyl ITC were identified as the two most prevalent forms. In contrast, the presence of ITC was detected at a much lower abundance in steamed Brussels sprouts compared to the other cooking treatments. In the case of sulfarane, one of the most health-promoting ITCs, its presence was not observed after any of the cooking methods. This observation has been previously noted [18,23,24]. According to the authors, the loss of SF can be attributed to the heat inactivation of myrosinase, as well as leaching of glucoraphanin (sulpharane precursor) and sulpharane into the boiling water, and, finally, ITC could be volatilized while cooking.

4.2. Bioaccessibility of Phytochemicals after In Vitro Digestion

In order to assess the bioaccessibility of the bioactive compounds present in Brussels sprouts, samples subjected to thermal treatment were subjected to simulated in vitro digestion using gastric, bile and pancreatic enzymes. The analysis of the glucosinolate content after digestion revealed a reduction in the levels of individual compounds following all thermal treatment variants, with values ranging from 1.25 µmol/g d.w. to 2.32 µmol/g d.w. This indicates that less than 15% of the GLS content was bioaccessible to human enterocytes.
To date, there has been limited research on the in vitro digestion of thermally processed Brussels sprouts. In a recent study, Vancoillie et al. [3] observed that the total concentration of glucosinolates remained similar throughout the in vitro digestion of heated Brussels sprout puree. This led to the conclusion that heating vegetables prior to digestion could have a stabilizing effect on most of the phytochemicals considered. However, there is a lack of data on the bioaccessibility ratio obtained for the sum as well as for the individual glucosinolates. Similar studies on Brassica vegetables treated with simulated in vitro digestion have been conducted for other species, mainly broccoli, and the results obtained were largely comparable, although the experiments were conducted exclusively on raw vegetable material. To provide an illustration, Vallejo et al. [25] found a 69% reduction in total glucosinolate content in broccoli during in vitro gastric digestion, with a 12% additional loss post intestinal digestion. This resulted in a bioaccessible fraction of only 19% for glucosinolates in the human digestive tract. Fernández-León et al. [26] also observed a loss of approximately 69% (equivalent to 31% of bioaccessibility) in terms of total glucosinolate content in broccoli and cabbage following simulated in vitro digestion. These observations are consistent with the findings of the study conducted by Camara-Martos et al. [17], which demonstrated that over 30% of the glucosinolates initially present in leafy Brassica vegetables could reach human enterocytes. However, it is important to note that these results were obtained using raw plants. Consequently, when compared with the results obtained from the processed samples, it can be concluded that the heat treatment of Brassica vegetables, including Brussels sprouts, may reduce the bioavailability of GLS by approximately 50%.
The changes in the levels of the individual glucosinolates were considered. It was found that GRA, GIV and GNS were completely degraded, and their presence was not detected in the samples after digestion. MetGBS was the most resistant compound to digestion, with its level decreasing to 40% after simulated digestion in the case of the sous vide method and 35% after steaming. However, in the case of conventional cooking, in vitro digestion resulted in complete degradation of MetGBS.
With regard to the impact of thermal processing on glucosinolate bioavailability, statistically significant differences were observed only for GIB in conventionally cooked samples (significantly lower content after digestion, 9.3%) in comparison to steaming and sous vide methods. (20.9% and 27.2%, respectively) and for GNA in samples cooked by the sous vide technique (significantly higher content after digestion, 23.3%) compared to steaming (only 6.1%). In conclusion, it can be stated that digestion is more effective after sous vide and traditional cooking methods, and slightly less effective after steaming.
Unfortunately, there were no adequate reports in the literature for processed Brussels sprouts to enable comparison. According to Cuomo et al. [27], glucoraphanin from steamed broccoli was degraded by just 5% following in vitro digestion. A comparable experiment was performed with white cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata), Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis) and bok choy (Brassica rapa L. ssp. chinensis), which were steamed, blanched, dried and pulverised. Kuljarachanan et al. [2] demonstrated that glucoraphanin remained stable throughout the in vitro digestion process. These findings are contradictory to those of our study, in which glucoraphanin was completely degraded in all cases. Conversely, Rodríguez-Hernández et al. [28] conducted an in vitro digestion of different cultivars of raw freeze-dried broccoli and measured the glucoraphanin content, which decreased by only 7%. In a similar study, Fernández-León et al. [26] found that glucobrassicin exhibited the highest value of bioaccessibility compared to other glucosinolates present in raw broccoli and cabbage. The bioaccessibilities of the predominant glucosinolates were moderate, with values ranging from 13.1% for glucoraphanin to 43.2% for gluconapin. Hwang et al. [1] observed that immediately after 30-60 minutes of simulated gastric digestion, the levels of sinigrin, gluconastrurtiin, glubrasscin and 4-methoxyglucobrassicin were significantly reduced compared to the levels in fresh kale. After 120 minutes, the levels of all glucosinolates were reduced and no glucobrasscin could be detected in the digesta. In simulated intestinal digestion, the levels of glucoraphanin, sinigrin and gluconapin were reduced by 29%, 32% and 43% respectively, whereas the losses of gluconasturtiin (99%) and 4-methoxyglucobrassicin (81%) were even more pronounced. This is in partial agreement with our experiment where gluconasturtiin was completely degraded after in vitro digestion. However, as previously stated, these results were obtained only on raw material subjected to simulated in vitro digestion. When compared with our results, it can be suggested that heat treatment of certain Brassica vegetables can drastically reduce the glucoraphanin levels after in vitro digestion.
In the case of isothiocyanates and indoles, no significant differences were observed between the contents in the samples after thermal treatment and after digestion. All the results obtained were at similar levels, suggesting that the compounds, if present in the samples after cooking, remained stable during in vitro digestion.
The stability of ITCs during digestion is not well documented. In the available literature, similar experiments have been performed on broccoli, where up to 50% of the released sulforaphane could be collected in the bioaccessible dialyzed fraction. The content of sulforaphane in the digesta (both in the gastric and intestinal phases) increased during the digestion of raw or 1 min steamed broccoli, although no reduction in glucoraphanin concentration was observed in the same digested samples. Other findings indicated that at the acidic pH of the gastric phase, indole-3-carbinol can form dimers and condensation products, including diindolylmethane and indolo[3,2-b]carbazole [22]. Abellan et al. [29] observed a concentration in digestates of over 0.10 mg/100 g f.w. in only those derived from red radish sprouts. This result aligns with previously documented descriptions in the literature of the gastric digestion capacity to extract ITCs and indoles from brassicas following ingestion. Furthermore, the low pH of the simulated gastric fluid (SGF) is thought to facilitate the formation of nitriles and epionitriles, rather than ITCs, due to the acidity of the fluid.

5. Conclusions

Cruciferous vegetables are a valuable source of bioactive compounds, however, there has been a deficiency of information regarding the extent to which these compounds remain available to the body following thermal treatment and digestion processes within the digestive tract. In the experiment, we hypothesized that the type of thermal processing method could influence on the level of glucosinolates, isothiocyanates and indoles. It was also assumed that the type of thermal treatment would affect the degree of digestion of the analyzed compounds and their bioavailability. The final outcomes showed that the type of thermal treatment may result in significant losses in the case of glucosinolates but has a negligible effect on the content of isothiocyanates and indoles. Consequently, simulated in vitro digestion resulted in a considerable reduction in glucosinolate content, with only 15% of the compounds becoming available to the body. Conversely, isothiocyanates and indoles appeared to be resistant to digestion. The findings of this study may contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the changes in bioactive compounds within a simulated digestive tract, thereby improving the bioaccessibility of glucosinolates in human nutrition.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.F., A.F-F. and J.D.; methodology, B.K. and J.D.; software, B.K. and A.F.; validation, B.K. and A.F.; formal analysis, A.S-R.; investigation, J.D. and T.D.; resources, T.D.; data curation, B.K.; writing—original draft preparation, A.S-R.; writing—review and editing, A.S-R.; visualization, A.S-R.; supervision, A.F.; project administration, A.F-F.; funding acquisition, A.F-F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Hwang, E.-S.; Bornhorst, G.M.; Oteiza, P.I.; Mitchell, A.E. Assessing the fate and bioavailability of glucosinolates in kale (Brassica oleracea) using simulated human digestion and caco-2 cell uptake models. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 9492–9500. [CrossRef]
  2. Kuljarachanan, T.; Fu N.; Chiewchan, N.; Devahastin, S.; Chen, X.D. Evolution of important glucosinolates in three common Brassica vegetables during their processing into vegetable powder and in vitro gastric digestion. Food Funct. 2020, 11(1), 211-220.
  3. Vancoillie, F.; Verkempinck, S.H.E.; Sluys, L.; De Mazière, S.; Van Poucke, C.; Hendrickx, M.E.; Van Loey, A.M.; Grauwet, T. Stability and bioaccessibility of micronutrients and phytochemicals present in processed leek and Brussels sprouts during static in vitro digestion. Food Chem. 2024, 445, 138644.
  4. Doniec, J.; Florkiewicz, A.; Duliński, R.; Filipiak-Florkiewicz, A. Impact of Hydrothermal Treatments on Nutritional Value and Mineral Bioaccessibility of Brussels Sprouts (Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera). Molecules 2022, 27, 1861. [CrossRef]
  5. Doniec, J.; Pierzchalska, M.; Mickowska, B.; Grabacka, M. The in vitro digestates from Brussels sprouts processed with various hydrothermal treatments affect the intestinal epithelial cell differentiation, mitochondrial polarization and glutathione level. AFSci 2023, 32, 3, 154–165. [CrossRef]
  6. Martínez-Castro, J.; De Haro-Bailón, A.; Obregón-Cano, S.; García Magdaleno, I.M.; Moreno Ortega, A.; Cámara-Martos, F. Bioaccessibility of glucosinolates, isothiocyanates and inorganic micronutrients in cruciferous vegetables through INFOGEST static in vitro digestion model. Food Res. Int. 2023, 166, 112598. [CrossRef]
  7. Wieczorek, M.N.; Drabińska, N.; Jeleń, H.H. Thermal processing-induced changes in volatilome and metabolome of Brussels sprouts: focus on glucosinolate metabolism. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2023, 249, 2165–2174. [CrossRef]
  8. .
  9. Żyła, K.; Ledoux, D.R.; Garcia, A.; Veum, T.L. An in vitro procedure for studying enzymic dephosphorylation of phytate in maize-soya bean feeds for turkey poults. Br. J. Nutr. 1995, 74, 3–17.
  10. Starzyńska-Janiszewska, A.; Dulinski, R.; Stodolak, B.; Mickowska, B.; Wikiera, A. Prolonged tempe-type fermentation in order to improve bioactive potential and nutritional parameters of quinoa seeds. J. Cereal Sci. 2016, 71, 116–121. [CrossRef]
  11. 11. ISO 9167-1:1992. Rapeseed. Determination of glucosinolates content. Part 1: Method using high-performance liquid chromatography. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1992.
  12. Kusznierewicz, B.; Iori, R.; Piekarska, A.; Namieśnik, J.; Bartoszek, A. Convenient identification of desulfoglucosinolates on the basis of mass spectra obtained during liquid chromatography–diode array–electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry analysis: Method verification for sprouts of different Brassicaceae species extracts. J. Chrom. A. 2013, 1278, 108-115. [CrossRef]
  13. Seljåsen, R.; Kusznierewicz, B.; Bartoszek, A.; Mølmann, J.; Vågen, I.M. Effects of post-harvest elicitor treatments with ultrasound, UV- and photosynthetic active radiation on polyphenols, glucosinolates and antioxidant activity in a waste fraction of white cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata). Molecules 2022, 27, 5256.
  14. Pilipczuk, T.; Dawidowska, N.; Kusznierewicz, B.; Namieśnik, J.; Bartoszek, A. Simultaneous determination of indolic compounds in plant extracts by solid-phase extraction and high-performance liquid chromatography with UV and fluorescence detection. Food Anal. Method. 2015, 8, 2169–2177. [CrossRef]
  15. Pilipczuk, T.; Kusznierewicz, B.; Chmiel, T.; Przychodzeń, W.; Bartoszek, A. Simultaneous determination of individual isothiocyanates in plant samples by HPLC-DAD-MS following SPE and derivatization with N-acetyl-l-cysteine. Food Chem. 2017, 214, 587-596. [CrossRef]
  16. Abdel-Massih, R.M.; Debs, E., Othman, L.; Attieh, J.; Cabrerizo, F.M. Glucosinolates, a natural chemical arsenal: More to tell than the myrosinase story. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1130208. [CrossRef]
  17. Cámara-Martos, F.; Obregón-Cano, S.; Mesa-Plata, O.; Cartea-González, M.E.; De Haro-Bailón, A. Quantification and in vitro bioaccessibility of glucosinolates and trace elements in Brassicaceae leafy vegetables. Food Chem. 2021, 339, 127860. [CrossRef]
  18. Ciska, E.; Drabińska, N.; Honke, J.; Narwojsz, A. Boiled Brussels sprouts: A rich source of glucosinolates and the corresponding nitriles. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 19, 91–99. [CrossRef]
  19. Williams, D.E. Indoles derived from glucobrassicin: cancer chemoprevention by Indole-3-carbinol and 3,3’-diindolylmethane. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 734334. [CrossRef]
  20. Florkiewicz, A.; Ciska, E.; Filipiak-Florkiewicz, A.; Topolska, K. Comparison of Sous-vide methods and traditional hydrothermal treatment on GLS content in Brassica vegetables. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2017, 243, 1507–1517. [CrossRef]
  21. Barba, F.J.; Nikmaram, N.; Roohinejad, S.; Khelfa, A.; Zhu, Z.; Koubaa, M. Bioavailability of Glucosinolates and Their Breakdown Products: Impact of Processing. Front. Nutr. 2016, 16, 3-24. [CrossRef]
  22. Oliviero, T.; Verkerk, R.; Dekker, M. Isothiocyanates from Brassica Vegetables - effects of processing, cooking, mastication, and digestion. Molecular Nutrition Food Res. 2018, 62, 1701069.
  23. Sun, J.; Wang, Y.; Pang, X.; Tian, S.; Hu, Q.; Li, X.; Liu, J.; Wang, J.; Lu, Y. The effect of processing and cooking on glucoraphanin and sulforaphane in brassica vegetables. Food Chem. 2021, 360, 130007. [CrossRef]
  24. Baenas, N.; Marhuenda, J.; García-Viguera, C.; Zafrilla, P.; Moreno, D. Influence of Cooking Methods on Glucosinolates and Isothiocyanates Content in Novel Cruciferous Foods. Foods 2019, 12, 8, 257. [CrossRef]
  25. Vallejo, F.; Gil-Izquierdo, A.; Pérez-Vicente, A.; García-Viguera, C. In vitro gastrointestinal digestion study of broccoli inflorescence phenolic compounds, glucosinolates, and vitamin C. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 135–138. [CrossRef]
  26. Fernández-León, A.M.; Fernández-León, M.F.; González-Gómez, D.; Ayuso, M.C.; Bernalte, M.J. Quantification and bioaccessibility of intact glucosinolates in broccoli ‘Parthenon’ and Savoy cabbage ‘Dama.’ J. Food Compos. Anal. 2017, 61, 40–46. [CrossRef]
  27. Cuomo, V.; Luciano, F.B.; Meca, G.; Ritieni, A.; Mañes, J. Bioaccessibility of glucoraphanin from broccoli using an in vitro gastrointestinal digestion model. CyTA – J. Food 2015, 13, 361–365.
  28. Rodríguez-Hernández, M.C.; Medina, S.; Gil-Izquierdo, A.; Martínez-Ballesta, M.C.; Moreno, D.A. Broccoli isothiocyanate content and in vitro availability according to variety and origin. Maced. J. Chem. Chem. Eng. 2013, 32(2), 251–264. [CrossRef]
  29. Abellán, Á.; Domínguez-Perles, R.; García-Viguera, C.; Moreno, D.A. Evidence on the Bioaccessibility of Glucosinolates and Breakdown Products of Cruciferous Sprouts by Simulated In Vitro Gastrointestinal Digestion. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 11046. [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Sample chromatogram of (a) desulfoglucosinolates (λ=229 nm) obtained during LC-PAD analysis and (b) indolic compounds (ex./em.-280/360 nm) obtained during LC-FLD analysis of extract from raw Brussels sprouts. GIB, glucoiberin; PRO, progoitrin; GRA, glucoraphanin; SIN, sinigrin; GNA, gluconapin; GIV, glucoiberverin; GTL(IS), glucotropaeolin (internal standard); GBS, glucobrassicin; GNS, gluconasturcin, metGBS, methoxyglucobrassicin; Trp, tryptophan; UN, unknown; ABG, ascorbigen; I3C, indole-3-carbinol; I3ACN, 3-indoleacetonitrile; DIM, diindolylmethane.
Figure 1. Sample chromatogram of (a) desulfoglucosinolates (λ=229 nm) obtained during LC-PAD analysis and (b) indolic compounds (ex./em.-280/360 nm) obtained during LC-FLD analysis of extract from raw Brussels sprouts. GIB, glucoiberin; PRO, progoitrin; GRA, glucoraphanin; SIN, sinigrin; GNA, gluconapin; GIV, glucoiberverin; GTL(IS), glucotropaeolin (internal standard); GBS, glucobrassicin; GNS, gluconasturcin, metGBS, methoxyglucobrassicin; Trp, tryptophan; UN, unknown; ABG, ascorbigen; I3C, indole-3-carbinol; I3ACN, 3-indoleacetonitrile; DIM, diindolylmethane.
Preprints 114513 g001
Figure 2. Sample chromatograms obtained during determination of (a) individual ITC as ITC-NAC conjugates (λ=272 nm) and (b) total ITC as BDTT (λ=365 nm) of extract from raw Brussels sprouts. IB, iberin; AITC, allyl-ITC; SFN, sulforaphane; BITC, 3-butenyl-ITC; BDTT, 1,3-benzenedithiole-2-thione.
Figure 2. Sample chromatograms obtained during determination of (a) individual ITC as ITC-NAC conjugates (λ=272 nm) and (b) total ITC as BDTT (λ=365 nm) of extract from raw Brussels sprouts. IB, iberin; AITC, allyl-ITC; SFN, sulforaphane; BITC, 3-butenyl-ITC; BDTT, 1,3-benzenedithiole-2-thione.
Preprints 114513 g002
Table 1. Chromatographic and spectrometric data obtained during LC-PAD-HRMS analyses of Brussels sprouts extracts used for putative identification of selected secondary metabolites.
Table 1. Chromatographic and spectrometric data obtained during LC-PAD-HRMS analyses of Brussels sprouts extracts used for putative identification of selected secondary metabolites.
Compound Name RT [min] Molecular Formula Precursor Ion (m/z) Diagnostic Ions (m/z)
Theoretical Experimental Δm (ppm)
Glucosinolates [MDS-GLS-H] [MDS-GLS-H-162]
Glucoiberin (GIB) 3.9 C11H21NO10S3 342.068123 342.068329 0.60 180.016 [C5H10NO2S2]
Progoitrin (PRO) 4.2 C11H19NO10S2 308.080401 308.080780 1.23 146.027 [C5H8NO2S]
Glucoraphanin (GRA) 5.7 C12H23NO10S3 356.083772 356.084106 0.94 194.030 [C6H12NO2S2]
Sinigrin (SIN) 5.9 C10H17NO9S2 278.069836 278.070099 0.95 116.016 [C4H6NOS]
Gluconapin (GNA) 9.9 C11H19NO9S2 292.085486 292.085937 1.54 130.032 [C5H8NOS]
Glucoiberverin (GIV) 11.9 C11H21NO9S3 326.073208 326.073547 1.04 164.020 [C5H10NOS2]
Glucobrassicin (GBS) 18.4 C16H20N2O9S2 367.096385 367.096558 0.47 205.043 [C10H9N2OS]
Gluconasturtiin (GNS) 21.4 C15H21NO9S2 342.101136 342.101471 0.98 180.048 [C9H10NOS]
Methoxyglucobrassicin (metGBS) 21.7 C17H22N2O10S2 397.106950 397.106735 0.54 235.054 [C11H11N2O2S]
Isothiocyanates [MNAC-ITC+H]+ [MNAC-ITC+H-NAC]+
Iberin (IB) 4.6 C5H9NOS2 327.050699 327.049974 2.22 164.017 [C5H10NOS2]+
Allyl-ITC (AITC) 7.2 C4H5NS 263.052412 263.051697 2.72 100.022 [C4H6NS]+
Sulforaphane (SFN) 7.7 C6H11NOS2 341.066349 341.065643 2.07 178.035 [C6H12NOS2] +
3-Butenyl-ITC (BITC) 8.9 C5H7NS 277.068062 277.0674438 2.23 114.037 [C5H8NS] +
Indoles [M+H]+
Tryptophan (Trp) 4.5 C11H12N2O2 205.097703 205.097107 2.91 118.065 [C8H8N]+, 146.060 [C9H8NO]+
Unknown (UN) 5.4 C14H15NO4 262.107934 262.107330 2.30 130.065 [C9H8N]+, 118.065 [C8H8N]+
Ascorbigen (ABG) 6.9 C15H15NO6 306.097764 306.096924 2.74 130.065 [C9H8N]+
Indole-3-carbinol (I3C) 8.8 C9H9NO 148.076239 148.0765378 2.02 130.065 [C9H8N]+, 118.065 [C8H8N]+
3-Indoleacetonitrile (I3ACN) 12.5 C10H8N2 157.076573 - - -
3,3'-Diindolylmethane (DIM) 18.2 C17H14N2 247.123523 - - -
Table 2. Content of glucosinolates, isothiocyanates and indoles in examined Brussel sprouts.
Table 2. Content of glucosinolates, isothiocyanates and indoles in examined Brussel sprouts.
Content [µmol/g d.w.] (mean ± standard deviation, n = 3)
Compound Raw (R) Sous vide (SV) Steam (S) Boiled (B) Sous vide-digested (SV-D) Steam-digested (S-D) Boiled-digested (B-D)
Glucosinolates
GIB* 0.736ab ± 0.016 0.674a ± 0.036 0.774b ± 0.025 0.861c ± 0.032 0.183d ± 0.012 0.162d ± 0.002 0.080e ± 0.010
PRO* 2.162ab ± 0.193 1.639c ± 0.221 1.925ac ± 0.154 2.542b ± 0.293 0.088d ± 0.027 0.259d ± 0.012 0.278d ± 0.023
GRA** 0.295a ± 0.018 0.244a ± 0.03 0.352a ± 0.062 0.368a ± 0.045 <LOD <LOD <LOD
SIN* 4.779a ± 0.336 4.196a ± 0.451 4.495a ± 0.187 4.966a ± 0.443 0.398b ± 0.025 0.587b ± 0.019 1.070b ± 0.008
GNA* 2.795a ± 0.152 1.799b ± 0.196 2.235c ± 0.060 2.493ac ± 0.170 0.110d ± 0.023 0.520e ± 0.021 0.162de ± 0.007
GIV** 0.304ab ± 0.014 0.257a ± 0.021 0.381b ± 0.038 0.335ab ± 0.056 <LOD <LOD <LOD
GBS* 3.753a ± 0.059 4.074a ± 0.781 4.792ab ± 0.407 5.519b ± 0.398 0.352c ± 0.010 0.638c ± 0.007 0.100c ± 0.037
GNS** 0.119ab ± 0.015 0.076a ± 0.011 0.191b ± 0.046 0.107a ± 0.031 <LOD <LOD <LOD
metGBS** 0.105a ± 0.037 0.299b ± 0.031 0.444c ± 0.052 0.460c ± 0.057 0.120a ± 0.012 0.153a ± 0.021 <LOD
Total* 15.049ab ± 0.425 13.259a ± 1.670 15.589bc ± 0.446 17.651c ± 1.176 1.251d ± 0.023 2.319d ± 0.035 1.689d ± 0.032
Isothiocyanates
Iberin 0.298 ± 0.036 <LOQ <LOQ <LOQ <LOQ <LOQ <LOQ
Allyl iTC 0.248 ± 0.007 <LOQ <LOQ <LOQ <LOQ <LOQ <LOQ
Sulforaphane 0.035 ± 0.001 <LOQ <LOQ <LOQ <LOQ <LOQ <LOQ
3-butenyl-ITC 0.332 ± 0.025 <LOQ <LOQ <LOQ <LOQ <LOQ <LOQ
Total 0.914 ± 0.019 <LOQ <LOQ <LOQ <LOQ <LOQ <LOQ
Isothiocyanates by Zhang method
Total ITC** 0.899a ± 0.061 0.216abc ± 0.087 0.093abc ± 0.012 0.216abc ± 0.057 0.078abc ± 0.008 0.065bc ± 0.003 0.061bc ± 0.005
Indoles
Trp** 0.044a ± 0.003 0.033a ± 0.002 0.038a ± 0.006 0.036a ± 0.009 0.035a ± 0.007 0.042a ± 0.014 0.034a ± 0.001
Unknown** 0.021a ± 0.001 0.009ab ± 0.002 0.004ab ± 0.001 0.007ab ± 0.001 0.006ab ± 0.001 0.003ab ± 0.001 0.002b ± 0.001
ABG** 0.018 ± 0.001 <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD
I3C <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD
I3ACN** 0.025a ± 0.002 0.085ab ± 0.003 0.063ab ± 0.002 0.071ab ± 0.005 0.093b ± 0.003 0.067ab ± 0.011 0.071ab ± 0.014
DIM <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD
Total* 0.109a ± 0.007 0.128a ± 0.008 0.106a ± 0.007 0.115a ± 0.005 0.134a ± 0.010 0.114a ± 0.026 0.108a ± 0.015
LOD – level of detection. The same superscript letters in a line after mean values indicate no statistically significant differences between results (p > 0.05).m*one way Anova with Sheffe post-hoc test. **Kruskal-Wallis test.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated