1. Introduction
The World Health Organization’s (WHO) constitution states that health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity [
1]. Mental health is an integral and essential component of health [
1]. Thus, healthy oral cavity is one of the components of one’s well-being which for orthodontic patients depends mainly on the comfort while wearing orthodontic appliances.
According to WHO tooth decay, periodontological diseases and formation of malocclusions are three most commonly found disorders of the oral cavity [
1]. As it is such a common problem, a lot of countries are investigating the prevalence of these anomalies [
2]. It was found that the most common malocclusion was Angle Class I (found in approximately 70% of the subjects) and the least common malocclusion was Angle Class III (found in approximately 5% of the subjects) [
2,
3,
4]. In most of these investigations, researchers focused more on changes in psychological well-being of the patients before and after orthodontic treatment. Moreover, in a majority of the researches of patients wearing orthodontic appliances emphasis was on psychical pain or psychical discomfort. However, psychological health of patients wearing orthodontic appliances during orthodontic treatment was not investigated.
Therefore, the purpose of this investigation was to analyze and evaluate psychological health of patients wearing various orthodontic appliances during orthodontic treatment emphasizing mental issues rather than psychical ones.
2. Materials and Methods
Investigation was performed using anonymous questionnaires of 31 questions that were composed to evaluate psychological well-being of patients wearing orthodontic appliances. The authors confirm that all methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. All experimental protocols were approved by the Bioethical committee of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (No. BEC-OF-98). Informed consent was obtained from all subjects and/or their legal guardian(s).
Questionnaire consisted of: 7 questions about demographical information of the patient; 13 questions about psychological well-being of the patient; 3 questions about pain; 4 questions about eating difficulties; 3 questions about speech difficulties; 1 question about salivating. All of the questions were given with an option to choose from given answers or if needed to write their own. Investigation was performed in Orthodontic Clinic. Selected subjects of the investigation were patients wearing various orthodontic appliances.
Transparency and Openness
We report how we determined our sample size, all data exclusions (if any), all manipulations, and all measures in the study, and we follow JARS (Kazak, 2018). Sample size was calculated using Paniotto formula: n = 1/ (∆^2 + 1/N). n – sample size of subjects; ∆^2 – size of the sampling error; N – general sample size. When size of the sampling error was 0.05, calculated sample size was 333. There were 339 patients in this investigation, therefore, the sample size of was enough.
Criteria for inclusion into investigation were the following: patients that were being treated orthodontically in Orthodontic Clinic without mental disorders and congenital syndromes.
All of the collected data was processed using SPSS 22.0 (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) program which was used in collecting and analyzing data. Descriptive statistics were reported as the mean and standard deviation (SD). Hypotheses of interrelations between characteristics were verified using Pearson chi-squared test (X2). P-values less than 0.05 were considered significant. The power of the analysis was 0.8. This study’s design and its analysis were not pre-registered.
3. Results
This investigation included data of 339 patients. Average age of subjects was 14.08 years, the youngest patient was 7 years old and the oldest patient was 42 years old. As shown in the table below (
Table 1) more than half of the investigated patients included were women (69%) and only 31% were men. Subjects were divided into four groups: 1) younger than 14 years of age (14 years old included) wearing removable appliances; 2) younger than 14 years of age wearing braces; 3) older than 14 years of age wearing removable appliances and 4) older than 14 years of age wearing braces. This division was based on average age of the subjects which was around 14 years of age.
Between both age groups reasons to seek orthodontic treatment did not differ much. Both younger and older than 14 years old patients indicated crooked teeth and bad bite as main reasons to seek orthodontic treatment (
Table 2). However, women seeked orthodontic treatment because of crooked teeth meanwhile men indicated bad bite as the main reason for treatment.
This investigation evaluated patients’ satisfaction with their smile before orthodontic treatment. It was discovered that 41.6% were satisfied with their smile while even 48% were unsatisfied (
Table 3).
Considering psychological well-being of the patients, almost 50% of the subjects (48.7%) noted that they were feeling good and about 38% noted that they were feeling normal. Nevertheless, only 4% of all subjects included in this investigation noted that they were feeling bad while wearing orthodontic appliances. Also, statistically significant difference was found between genders as women were more likely to feel very comfortable (great) while men usually felt good or normal while wearing orthodontic appliances. Results are shown in
Table 4.
Only 9% of the subjects included in this investigation stated that they felt unhappy wearing orthodontic appliances, however 45% of subjects stated that they felt unhappy at least sometimes. It was found that patients younger than 14 years old wearing braces statistically more often felt unhappy (
Table 5).
It was found that 43% of subjects felt stress while wearing orthodontic appliances. There was a statistically significant difference between patients younger than 14 years old wearing removable appliances and patients older than 14 years old wearing braces as these two groups felt stress more often than other patient groups (
Table 6).
Evaluation of eating difficulties with orthodontic appliances showed that even 75% of patients had these difficulties while wearing braces. These patients had to stop eating certain kind of foods such as nuts, chewing gum and popcorns to avoid breakage of braces. When evaluating effect of orthodontic appliances on structures of oral cavity it was found that 56% of the subjects had problems only in the beginning of the treatment and only less than 20% of the subjetcs had these issues during the whole treatment. Also, statistically significantly more often problems with mucosa had patients wearing braces and men.
Speech difficulties were felt by more than 30% of the subjects and about 26% indicated that they felt speech difficulties at least partially. Statistically significant difference of speech difficulties were felt by patients wearing removable appliances. The most common speech difficulties were slurred speech (84%) and difficulties pronouncing certain words (16%).
Increased salivation was felt by more than half of the subjects (58.8%). Statistically significantly more often increased salivation was felt by patients wearing removable appliances and more often by men. Moreover, subjects were asked whether they had to give up any leisure activities due to orthodontic treatment and only 3 respondents said they gave up playing the winds. Others did not indicate any restrictions of leisure activities due to orthodontic treatment.
4. Discussion
Usually, orthodontic treatment is performed in young patients because for the achievement of good results it is necessary to start treatment in growinging patient (at least until the age of 14 years of age). However, orthodontic treatment can be proposed even for older patients, but they require different methods of orthodontic treatment.
The main goal of orthodontic treatment is to balance aesthetic, functional, and patients’ ambitions, which contributes to their quality of life [
5,
6].
Several factors affect the quality of life during orthodontic treatment, such as pain, difficulties while eating, changes in speech and diet [
6,
7]. Previous research had identified that fixed appliances affect everyday life, in terms of aesthetics, functional limitations, diet, oral hygiene and socially [
8,
9]. Oral health status and quality of life were negatively affected during treatment, but improved afterwards [
8,
10,
11]. Pain from fixed appliances reduced after a few days [
8,
12,
13]. However, there were no research on removable orthodontic appliances and retainers, although the ability to remove one’s appliance during eating, cleaning and talking, could result in different effect [
8]. Thus, this investigation focussed on well-being of patients wearing removable and non- removable orthodontic appliances.
From 339 patients included in this study more than two thirds were woman and only one third were men. Furthermore, main reason for women to seek orthodontic treatment were crooked teeth and esthetic reasons, while for majority of men main reason was bad, traumatic bite. A study by Jung on Korean mid school going adolescents unveiled that after fixed orthodontic treatment, the girls had higher self-esteem than the untreated malocclusion group compared to boys [
14]. This showed that women tended to pay more attention to esthetics, thus their self-esteem depended on their smile esthetics.
More than 50% of the subjects wearing orthodontic appliances evaluated their well-being as average and only 4% said they felt very bad. Moreover, patients wearing braces evaluated their well-being as normal or bad when compared to patients wearing removable appliances. This was because braces, which were fixed to a person’s teeth, could cause pain or discomfort, and it might make everyday life more difficult in feeling as ‘embarrassing’ or ‘upsetting’ [
8]. Furthermore, younger than 14 years old patients wearing removable appliances were less likely to feel great or good, compared to older than 14-year-old patients wearing removable appliances. This can be explained by the disturbances of speech, tongue irritation and difficulty in chewing with more social embarrassment for younger patients [
15]. Whereas, older patients usually use removable appliances only at night as retainers after orthodontic treatment.
It was discovered that only 9% of the subjects marked that they feel unhappy wearing orthodontic appliances, however 45% of the subjects stated that they feel unhappy at least sometimes. Moreover, women were statistically significantly more prone to feel unhappy compared to men. Similar results were found in study performed in 2020 in India. Authors discovered that there was a statistically significant difference between the overall psychological impact of dental aesthetics and specific psychological impact in males and females, with females having higher scores [
16]. This may be explained by the fact that females were more concerned and dissatisfied with their dental appearance as compared to males [
16], therefore, orthodontic treatment worsened women’s appearance for the time of the treatment and they felt more unhappy.
The majority of patients feeling stress during orthodontic treatment were patients wearing braces in both age groups. However, the majority of patients who did not feel stress were patients older than 14 years old wearing removable appliance. This seems like a paradox as removable appliances usually affect speech and older patients wearing removable appliances should feel more stress, yet most of these patients wore removable appliances as retainers after orthodontic treatment only at night, therefore, they did not feel stressed about it.
Furthermore, patients’ well-being greatly depended on discomfort or difficulties that occurred because of orthodontic treatment. Discomfort included speech difficulties, changes in eating habits, effect on oral structures, increased salivation and more attention to one’s teeth by others. The greater the discomfort, the lesser the well-being of the patient. Similar results were found in various studies around the world. Investigation done in United Kingdom showed that 47% of students of 11-12 years age experienced bullying due to appearance of their teeth [
17], thus they evaluated their well-being poorly. Another research done in 2019 by S.Silva also found that 18% of the subjects undergoing orthodontic treatment with braces experienced difficulties while eating [
15]. In our investigation patients with braces had more difficulties compared to patients with removable appliances and this can be explained as patients with removable applianced removed it before eating while patients wearing braces could not do that. Moreover, in our investigation 26% of the patients experienced at least partial difficulties of speech. Similar results were found in reasearch of A.Kavaliauskiene with colleagues where 26.8% of the subjects experienced speech difficulties [
18]. Usually, removable appliances cover the palate and are relatively huge appliances, thus tongue has less space for articulation and difficulties in speech may appear. Furthermore, patients wearing removable appliances experienced increased salivation statistically significantly more often.
5. Conclusions
In conclusion, even though patients indicated various negative aspects of orthodontic appliances on their well-being during orthodontic treatment, for the majority of the subjects end results of the treatment significantly increased their psychological well-being, self esteem and social life [
15,
19].
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, G.T., K.L. and R.N.; methodology, D.S.; validation, A.V.; investigation, B.A., R.N. and G.T.; resources, K.L.; data curation, G.T.; writing—original draft preparation, R.N.; writing—review and editing, G.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- World Health Organization. (2022). Constitution of the World Health Organization. Retrieved from World Health Organization website: https://www.who.int/about/governance/constitution (last accessed on 2022 10 15).
- Alhammadi, M. S., Halboub, E., Fayed, M. S., Labib, A., & El-Saaidi, C. (2018). Global distribution of malocclusion traits: A systematic review. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, 23(6), 40.e1–40.e10. [CrossRef]
- Parajuli, U., Tuladhar, S. L., Bajracharya, M., & Pandey, M. (2018). Prevalence of Malocclusion and Evaluation of Orthodontic Treatment Need amongst Patients in Pokhara, Nepal. Orthodontic Journal of Nepal, 8(1), 7–10. [CrossRef]
- Gudipaneni, R. K., Aldahmeshi, R. F., Patil, S. R., & Alam, M. K. (2018). The prevalence of malocclusion and the need for orthodontic treatment among adolescents in the northern border region of Saudi Arabia: an epidemiological study. BMC Oral Health, 18(1). [CrossRef]
- Demirovic, K., Habibovic, J., Dzemidzic, V., Tiro, A., & Nakas, E. (2019). Comparison of Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Treated and Non-Treated Orthodontic Patients. Medical Archives, 73(2), 113. [CrossRef]
- Kara-Boulad, J. M., Burhan, A. S., Hajeer, M. Y., Khattab, T. Z., & Nawaya, F. R. (2022). Evaluation of the Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) in Patients Undergoing Lingual Versus Labial Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Cureus, 14(3). [CrossRef]
- Sidlauskas, A., & Lopatiene, K. (2009). The prevalence of malocclusion among 7-15-year-old Lithuanian schoolchildren. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 45(2), 147–152. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19289905/. [CrossRef]
- Kettle, J. E., Hyde, A. C., Frawley, T., Granger, C., Longstaff, S. J., & Benson, P. E. (2020). Managing orthodontic appliances in everyday life: A qualitative study of young people’s experiences with removable functional appliances, fixed appliances and retainers. Journal of Orthodontics, 47(1), 47–54. [CrossRef]
- Mandall NA, Vine S, Hulland R and Worthington HV (2006) The impact of fixed orthodontic appliances on daily life. Community Dental Health 23: 69–74.
- Chen M, Wang D-W and Wu L-P (2010) Fixed Orthodontic Appliance Therapy and Its Impact on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Chinese Patients. Angle Orthodontist 80: 49–53.
- Zhang M, McGrath C and Hägg U (2008) Changes in oral health- related quality of life during fixed orthodontic appliance therapy. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 133: 25–29. [CrossRef]
- Abed Al Jawad F, Cunningham SJ, Croft N and Johal A (2012) A qualita- tive study of the early effects of fixed orthodontic treatment on die- tary intake and behaviour in adolescent patients. European Journal of Orthodontics 34: 432–436. [CrossRef]
- Stewart FN, Kerr WJS and Taylor PJS (1997) Appliance wear: the patient’s point of view. European Journal of Orthodontics 19: 377–382.
- Mandava, P., Singaraju, G. S., Obili, S., Nettam, V., Vatturu, S., & Erugu, S. (2021). Impact of self-esteem on the relationship between orthodontic treatment and the oral health-related quality of life in patients after orthodontic treatment - a systematic review. Medicine and Pharmacy Reports, 94(2), 158–169. [CrossRef]
- Kara-Boulad, J. M., Burhan, A. S., Hajeer, M. Y., Khattab, T. Z., & Nawaya, F. R. (2022). Evaluation of the Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) in Patients Undergoing Lingual Versus Labial Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Cureus, 14(3). [CrossRef]
- Rai, A., Kumari, M., Kumar, T., Rai, S., Gupta, H., & Singh, R. (2021). Analytical study of the psychosocial impact of malocclusion and maxillofacial deformity in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. Journal of Medicine and Life, 14(1), 21–31. [CrossRef]
- Al-Omari, I. K., Al-Bitar, Z. B., Sonbol, H. N., Al-Ahmad, H. T., Cunningham, S. J., & Al-Omiri, M. (2014). Impact of bullying due to dentofacial features on oral health–related quality of life. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 146(6), 734–739. [CrossRef]
- Kavaliauskiene, A., Smailiene, D., Buskiene, I., Keriene, D., & Buskienė, D. (2012). Pain and discomfort perception among patients undergoing orthodontic treatment: Results from one month follow-up study. Baltic Dental and Maxillofacial Journal, 14(4), 118–143.
- Jamilian, A., Kiaee, B., Sanayei, S., Khosravi, S., & Perillo, L. (2016). Orthodontic Treatment of Malocclusion and its Impact on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life. The Open Dentistry Journal, 10(1), 236–241. [CrossRef]
Table 1.
Social and demographical characteristics of the patients.
Table 1.
Social and demographical characteristics of the patients.
| Characteristics |
n |
Percentage |
| Patients’ group |
Younger than 14 years old wearing removable appliances |
167 |
49.3% |
| Younger than 14 years old wearing braces |
57 |
16.8% |
| Older than 14 years old wearing removable appliances |
8 |
2.4% |
| Older than 14 years old wearing braces |
107 |
31.6% |
| Gender |
Men |
105 |
31.0% |
| Women |
234 |
69.0% |
Table 2.
Reasons to seek orthodontic treatment in different patient groups.
Table 2.
Reasons to seek orthodontic treatment in different patient groups.
| |
Crooked Teeth |
Bad, Traumatic Bite |
Esthetics |
Other |
| Patient group |
Younger than 14 years old wearing removable appliances |
64.1% |
48.5% |
18.0% |
0.0% |
| Younger than 14 years old wearing braces |
84.2% |
52.6% |
22.8% |
0.0% |
| Older than 14 years old wearing removable appliances |
50.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
50.0% |
| Older than 14 years old wearing braces |
55.1% |
52.3% |
37.4% |
0.0% |
| χ2 |
14.472 |
8.469 |
16.149 |
167.476 |
| df |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
| p |
0.002* |
0.037* |
0.001* |
0.000* |
| Gender |
Men |
55.2% |
69.5% |
11.4% |
0.0% |
| Women |
68.4% |
40.2% |
30.3% |
1.7% |
| χ2 |
5.450 |
24.984 |
14.022 |
1.816 |
| df |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| p |
0.020* |
0.000* |
0.000* |
0.178 |
Table 3.
Prevalence of satisfaction before orthodontic treatment in different patient groups.
Table 3.
Prevalence of satisfaction before orthodontic treatment in different patient groups.
| |
Satisfaction with Their Smile |
χ2
|
df |
p |
| Very Satisfied |
Satisfied |
Unsatisfied |
Very Unsatisfied |
| Patient group |
Younger than 14 years old wearing removable appliances |
2.4% |
44.3% |
50.9% |
2.4% |
39.497 |
9 |
0.000* |
| Younger than 14 years old wearing braces |
26.3% |
24.6% |
43.9% |
5.3% |
| Older than 14 years old wearing removable appliances |
0.0% |
50.0% |
50.0% |
0.0% |
| Older than 14 years old wearing braces |
15.0% |
45.8% |
39.3% |
0.0% |
| Gender |
Men |
3.8% |
46.7% |
49.5% |
0.0% |
10.742 |
3 |
0.013* |
| Women |
13.2% |
39.3% |
44.4% |
3.0% |
Table 4.
Psychological well-being of patients wearing orthodontic appliances.
Table 4.
Psychological well-being of patients wearing orthodontic appliances.
| |
Psychological Well-Being of Patients Wearing Orthodontic Appliances |
χ2
|
df |
p |
| Great |
Good |
Normal |
Bad |
Very bad |
| Patient group |
Younger than 14 years old wearing removable appliances |
2.4% |
56.3% |
39.5% |
1.8% |
0.0% |
73.398 |
9 |
0.000* |
| Younger than 14 years old wearing braces |
1.8% |
63.2% |
24.6% |
10.5% |
0.0% |
| Older than 14 years old wearing removable appliances |
50.0% |
50.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
| Older than 14 years old wearing braces |
21.5% |
29.0% |
46.7% |
2.8% |
0.0% |
| Gender |
Men |
0.0% |
55.2% |
41.9% |
2.9% |
0.0% |
16.408 |
3 |
0.001* |
| Women |
13.7% |
45.7% |
36.8% |
3.8% |
0.0% |
Table 5.
Prevalence of feeling unhappy while wearing orthodontic appliances in different patient groups.
Table 5.
Prevalence of feeling unhappy while wearing orthodontic appliances in different patient groups.
| |
Feeling Unhappy Wearing Orthodontic Appliances |
χ2
|
df |
p |
| Yes |
No |
Sometimes |
| Patient group |
Younger than 14 years old wearing removable appliances |
10.5% |
56.1% |
33.3% |
20.804 |
6 |
0.002* |
| Younger than 14 years old wearing braces |
7.8% |
37.1% |
55.1% |
| Older than 14 years old wearing removable appliances |
0.0% |
100.0% |
0.0% |
| Older than 14 years old wearing braces |
9.3% |
51.4% |
39.3% |
Table 6.
Stress felt while wearing orthodontic appliances.
Table 6.
Stress felt while wearing orthodontic appliances.
| |
Stress Felt |
χ2
|
df |
p |
| Yes |
No |
Sometimes |
| Patient group |
Younger than 14 years old wearing removable appliances |
9.0% |
55.7% |
35.3% |
14.432 |
6 |
0.025* |
| Younger than 14 years old wearing braces |
10.5% |
64.9% |
24.6% |
| Older than 14 years old wearing removable appliances |
0.0% |
100.0% |
0.0% |
| Older than 14 years old wearing braces |
18.7% |
51.4% |
29.9% |
| Gender |
Men |
9.5% |
50.5% |
40.0% |
5.946 |
2 |
0.051 |
| Women |
13.2% |
59.8% |
26.9% |
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).