3.1. Characterization of CNTs Conductive Sponges and Ag-CNTs Particles
The surface topography of the Ag-CNTs/PDMS conductive sponges and Ag-CNTs particles was determined from the cross-sectional images obtained using field emission-scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM; S-4800, Hitachi), as shown in Figure. 2. As illustrated in
Figure 2(a), The PDMS sponge had a cross-linked network structure and the CNTs were successfully loaded onto the flexible PDMS substrate. As illustrated in
Figure 2(b), the cross-linking of CNTs was distributed in the conductive sponge, and agglomeration of CNTs appeared in the local area. As illustrated in
Figure 2(c), the Ag-CNTs were successfully loaded onto the flexible PDMS substrate. As illustrated in
Figure 2(d), the silver particles wrapped the CNTs such that the CNTs existed in a conductive sponge in the form of spherical particles. Owing to the coating of the silver particles, the conductive sponges were transformed from being in direct contact with each other between the CNTs to contact the silver particles. As illustrated in
Figure 2(e)~(f), after being coated with silver, the original smooth surface of the CNTs became rough and uneven.
3.2. Sensitivity of CNTs/PDMS Flexible Pressure Sensors (Heat-Drying)
On the one hand, with high compressibility and electronic conductivity, the CNTs/PDMS conductive sponge can detect various strains as well. In particular, the compressive stress mediate the conductive pathway of the CNTs/PDMS conductive sponge under different strains, resulting in conductance modulation. In
Figure 3, the red dot represents the contact point of the conductive pathway, the red line represents the assumed conductive pathway, and the black object represents the CNTs/PDMS conductive sponge.
Figure 3 (a) shows a schematic of the contact point of the conductive pathway in a conductive sponge under an uncompressed state. It was found that the internal connection of the conductive sponge was not yet stable in the initial state, and the number of contact points was small, thus the interior conductive pathway of the conductive sponge was less, and the conductive sponge had a higher resistance at this time. As shown in
Figure 3(b), when the conductive sponge was compressed by external pressure, the number of contact points increased rapidly, which caused the conductive pathway increase rapidly and the resistance of the conductive sponge decreases gradually. Because the electron transfer rate is faster at this time, the response rate of the entire flexible pressure sensor increases.
The resistance response can be monitored using a voltage signal with the stress imposed on the top surface during the compression. The resistance response is defined ΔR/R0 = (R0 – RP)/R0, where R0 and RP represent the resistances without and with compressive stress, respectively. As shown in
Figure 4, when the weight ratio of CNTs is in the range of 0.5 wt% to 2.5 wt%, as the proportion of CNTs increased, the resistance change rate increased gradually under the same pressure, but when the weight ratio exceeds 2.5 wt%, as the proportion of CNTs increased, the resistance change rate decreased gradually under the same pressure. This is because when the CNTs content is 0.5 wt% ~ 2.5 wt%, the PDMS sponge has not yet reached the saturation state. With an increase in the weight ratio of CNTs, the conductive channel in the conductive sponge gradually increased. When the CNTs content was more than 2.5 wt%, the PDMS sponge reached a saturation state. Further filling of the CNTs causes twining between the CNTs, which reduces the performance of CNTs in the conductive sponge.
The stress sensitivity of S can be defined as the slope of the curves:
The sensitivity S is the change in the resistance change rate of the sensor under the condition of 1kPa change in pressure.
Figure 4 shows the sensitivity fitting of the CNTs/PDMS flexible pressure sensors with weight ratios of 0 to 2 kPa, 3 to 10 kPa, and 15 to 40 kPa. As shown in this figure, when the weight ratio of the CNTs is in the range of 0.5 wt%~2.5 wt%, the sensitivity increases gradually with an increase in the weight ratio. When the weight ratio was 2.5 wt%, the sensitivity reached at peak value of 31.298 kPa-1, and the sensitivity gradually began to decrease with an increase in the weight ratio. At the same time, by comparing the sensitivity of 0~2 kPa, 3~10 kPa and 15~40 kPa, it was found that the sensitivity decreased with increasing the pressure. The reason is that in the stage of the initial pressure, the inside of the conductive sponge is relatively loose and the Poisson is relatively large, so that the conductive sponge can produce larger deformation under the action of low pressure, which causes the conductive path inside the conductive sponge increase rapidly so that the sensitivity increases.
3.4. Sensitivity of Ag-CNTs/PDMS Flexible Pressure Sensors
As shown in
Figure 6(a), when the weight ratio of Ag-CNTs was in the range of 0.5 wt% to 5.0 wt%, as the proportion of CNTs increased, the resistance change rate increased gradually under the same pressure. As shown in
Figure 6(b)~(h), when the weight ratio of the Ag-CNTs is in the range of 0.5 wt%~5.5 wt%, the sensitivity increases gradually with the increase of the weight ratio. When the weight ratio was 5.0 wt%, the sensitivity reached at peak value of 71.831 kPa-1.
The sensitivities of the CNTs/PDMS flexible pressure sensors (heat-drying and freeze-drying) and Ag-CNTs/PDMS flexible pressure sensors in the pressure range of 0~2 kPa were compared. The comparison values are listed in Table 1 and a comparison chart is shown in
Figure 7. As shown in
Figure 7(a), the CNTs/PDMS flexible pressure sensor prepared by freeze-drying has a higher sensitivity than the CNTs/PDMS flexible pressure sensor prepared by heat-drying and the sensitivity of Ag-CNTs/PDMS flexible pressure sensor is much higher than that of the CNTs/PDMS flexible pressure sensor when the weight ratio of the conductive filler material exceeds 0.5 wt%. In summary, it can be found that by optimizing the preparation process of the conductive sponge and the surface modification of the CNTs, the sensitivity of the flexible pressure sensor can be improved, so that the sensor has more excellent performance.
3.5. Stability and Hysteresis of the Flexible Pressure Sensor
(1) Stability
For the overall measurements, the resistance responses to repeated compression and release cycles are illustrated in
Figure 7(a). The flexible pressure sensor exhibited good stability in the overall cycle test under three different pressures, and the resistance change rate gradually increased as the pressure increased. Even with slight fluctuations under the test conditions at a pressure of 1 kPa, it is basically stable. Additionally, for large repeated strains, a series of resistance responses were obtained, as shown in
Figure 7(b). For different compressive strains, a higher strain results in a larger resistance response intensity.
(2) Hysteresis
Hysteresis refers to the degree of resistance change-pressure curve misalignment during the reverse and positive trip of the sensor. During the experiment, we developed a flexible pressure sensor with a complete load application and load release process to detect the rate of resistance change. The effect of hysteresis is crucial for sensors to detect dynamic loads. A large hysteresis in the flexible pressure sensor leads to irreversible recovery during the measurement of the dynamic load, thus affecting the accuracy of the experimental results. As shown in Figure. 7(c)~(e), the hysteresis error is larger at the low pressure stage and the hysteresis error is smaller at the higher pressure stage. This is because when the pressure is small, a small pressure change causes a large deformation of the conductive sponge, and it is more difficult for the conductive sponge to quickly return to the initial position, which leads to the larger hysteresis error. With a continuous increase in pressure, the conductive sponge exhibited a smaller deformation and the hysteresis error decreased gradually. The maximum hysteresis error of the flexible pressure sensor with an Ag-CNTs content of 2.5wt% was 9.45%. The maximum hysteresis error of the flexible pressure sensor with an Ag-CNTs content of 3.5 wt% was 5.74%. When the pressure exceeded 15 kPa, the hysteresis error between the reverse and positive trips was essentially zero, and the coincidence degree of the resistance change rate pressure curve was good. The maximum hysteresis error of the flexible pressure sensor with an Ag-CNTs content of 5.0 wt% is 3.39%, and when the pressure exceeds 10 kPa, the reverse and positive trip curves coincide.

3.6. Temperature-Pressure Coupling Applications of Flexible Sensor
(1) Temperature static characteristics of the flexible sensor
As shown in
Figure 8(a), the fluctuation in the resistance of the sensor is very small at different temperatures, indicating that the sensor has good stability and can be used for the coupling test of temperature and pressure. When a flexible sensor is tested, it is necessary to apply a certain voltage to the flexible sensor, so that self-heating can occur. Because the self-heating generated by the instrument may affect the subsequent temperature test so that it can produce errors, it is necessary to exclude the influence of self-heating on the temperature test. As shown in
Figure 8(b), the fitted I-V curves have a high degree of coincidence, and the resistance of the sensor does not vary with the voltage. The influence of self-heating generated by applying voltage on the temperature test was almost negligible, thus the flexible pressure sensor could be used for the temperature sensing test.
(2) Temperature sensing performance of the flexible sensor
As shown in
Figure 8(c)~(e), the sensors with three different CNTs contents show a linearly decreasing trend (NPC effect: negative temperature coefficient) as the temperature rises at a temperature gradient of 20~100 °C. This is because an increase in temperature increases the probability of electron transition between CNTs so that the resistance of the sensor decreases. The temperature-resistance formula was obtained by linearly fitting the three curves, and then the temperature sensitivity coefficient (TCR) was calculated according to the following formula:
In this formula, TCR is the temperature sensitivity coefficient, R0 is the initial resistance, and T is the ambient temperature. According to the calculation, the temperature sensitivity coefficient (TCR) of the flexible sensor can be maintained at approximately -0.00410 °C-1, indicating good stability. This indicates that the prepared sensor is expected to realize the temperature sensing function of the bionic human skin.
(3) Coupling of temperature and pressure
As shown in
Figure 8(f)~(i), when the pressure is 4, 8 and 20 kPa, the resistance decreases linearly with the increase in temperature. When the pressure was 40 kPa, the resistance remained unchanged, and was not affected by temperature changes. This is because when the pressure is low, the conduction network inside the conductive sponge changes with an increase in temperature. When the pressure exceeded a certain range, the conductive network inside the conductive sponge was shaped. The phenomenon of electronic transition is hardly observed in CNTs, so the temperature does not affect the resistance of the conductive sponge. By linearly fitting the temperature test curves under the four different pressures, the linear slope of each curve is the temperature coefficient. The result shows that within a certain pressure range, the temperature coefficient (the slope of the fitting curve) remains at -0.900 Ω/°C, therefore, the coupling formula of pressure and temperature can be proposed as follows:
when SP is the sensitivity, KT is the temperature coefficient, R0 is the initial resistance of the conductive sponge, ∆P and ∆T are the changes in the pressure and temperature, respectively. The sensor can simulate the sensing function of human skin to sense temperature and pressure, while simultaneously measuring the environmental temperature and the external force acting on the sensor.
Figure 9.
(a) Preparation sketch of pulse pressure sensor. (b) Schematic diagram of pulsed measurement. Pulse pulsation (c) 15 seconds in normal condition (d) 15 seconds after exercise (e) 1 minute in normal condition (f) 1 minute after exercise.
Figure 9.
(a) Preparation sketch of pulse pressure sensor. (b) Schematic diagram of pulsed measurement. Pulse pulsation (c) 15 seconds in normal condition (d) 15 seconds after exercise (e) 1 minute in normal condition (f) 1 minute after exercise.
3.7. Application of Wearable Pulse Sensing Device
Through the above experiment, we found that the prepared flexible pressure sensor has the function of detecting tiny pressures, therefor, it is assembled into a wearable pulse sensor device. We set up the prepared pulse sensor device on the wrist with an adhesive tap and set the time for 15s and 1 min to measure the change in current with pulse beat, as shown in
Figure 9(a)~(b).
Figure 9 (c)~(d) show the pulse beats in two different states within 15s, where each crest represents a pulse beat. It can be observed that the pulse beating curve in the motion state is denser and higher in peak, which conforms to the actual situation.
Figure 9(e)~(f) show the pulse beats in two different states within 1 min. According to the curve, the number of pulse beats per minute during the normal state of the tester was 76, and the number of beats per minute after the exercise increased to 119 beats. At the same time, we found that in the pulse beat curve after exercise, the peak value at the beginning was higher and the distribution of the peaks was denser. As time passes, the peak value gradually decreases and the peak distribution gradually disperses. This is because human physiological conditions tend to stabilize during testing. These results confirm the satisfactory capability of the wearable pulse device to identify the pulse condition of the human body in different states.