Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of Oleyl-WRH Peptides for siRNA Delivery

1. Introduction

Cancer is a fatal disease and a significantly global health concern due to its poor prognosis and the overexpression of genes in various cancer cells. Traditional clinical treatments are often associated with long-term physical and mental burdens, as well the development of resistance and resurgence [1]. Consequently, extensive research has focused on developing novel strategies to improve treatment outcomes and reduce these burdens, specially targeting the overexpressed genes.

One promising approach attracting the health care community’s attention is Small Interfering RNAs (siRNA)-mediated gene silencing, a promising type of RNA-based therapeutics. The effectiveness of RNA-based gene therapy hinges on the intracellular functionality of therapeutic RNA within target cells. Categorization by their biochemical mechanisms, these therapies require careful consideration of clinically significant drug delivery method [2]. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first siRNA drug 20 years after the first report of RNAi in eukaryotic cells Recently, FDA and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) approved siRNA therapeutics include Patisiran for hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis (hATTR), Givosiran for acute hepatic porphyria, Lumasiran for primary hyperoxaluria type 1, and Inclisiran for hypercholesterolemia [3]. Additionally, the FDA has accepted a new drug application for Vutrisiran, targeting polyneuropathy associated with hATTR amyloidosis [2,3].

siRNA has been delivered using various drug delivery approaches, including polymers [4], aptamers [5], lipids nanoparticles [6], viral carriers [7], and dendrimers [8,9]. However, these techniques still have limitations, such as cargo-carrying capacity, low delivery efficiency, the risk of mutation, high cytotoxicity, and lack of target specificity [10]. A possible alternative siRNA delivery system is afforded by the use of appropriate Cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs).

CPPs containing cationic amino acids such as lysine and arginine (R) and hydrophobic residues such as tryptophan (W), alanine, or phenylalanine have been used for siRNA delivery [11,12,13]. The acylation of CPPs with suitable fatty acyl chains has enhanced siRNA delivery by providing a hydrophobic region to entrap relatively large biomolecules. Furthermore, the positively charged residues, such as R, of CPPs can interact with the negatively charged backbone of siRNAs [14]. Various combinations of R and W in CPPs have shown promise in intracellular siRNA delivery [15,16]. Previous data indicated that oleyl-conjugated CGRKR peptides can deliver siRNA into tumor cells due to enhanced hydrophobicity [17,18]. A follow-up study from our laboratories demonstrated the application of histidine (H) and R in CPPs with an oleyl chain in delivering siRNA with promising cellular uptake and gene silencing efficiency in triple-negative breast cancer cells compared to standard transfecting agents, e.g., lipofectamine [18].

It has been observed that unsaturated fatty acids also enhance membrane permeability. The presence of R residue provides strong binding interactions to siRNA, whereas H residue helps create a proton sponge effect in endosomes, aiding in endosomal escape. H residue was selected due to its ability to utilize its imidazole ring as an endosome destabilization mechanism, facilitating the delivery of siRNA into the cytosol. The imidazole ring of histidine acts as a weak base, acquiring a cationic charge when the local pH environment drops below pH 6 [19]. The addition of W residues enhances the amphiphilic properties of peptides. Therefore, we hypothesize that fatty acylation of (WRH)_n peptide with an oleyl chain (n = 1-4) (Figure 1) could enhance siRNA delivery. The use of linear WRH peptides with fatty acyl chains has not yet been explored in drug delivery. To the best of our knowledge, there has been no previous report demonstrating the use of linear peptides constituting oleic acid with W, R, and H residues for siRNA delivery in MDA-MB-231 and SK-OV-3 cells. Therefore, we designed linear (WRH)_n peptides (n = 1-4) with or without oleic acid chains.

In this study, we synthesized a siRNA delivery system using Oleyl-WRH peptides using solid-phase peptide synthesis and evaluated their cytotoxicity, cellular uptake of peptide:siRNA complexes, and their STAT3 gene silencing efficiency. It is believed that amino acids with hydrophobic properties, like W, can generate a hydrophobic region and provide amphiphilicity to the peptide. Our studies will generate data to provide the feasibility of using appropriate oleyl-WRH peptides for siRNA delivery.

2. Results and Discussions

2.1. Chemistry

The peptides were synthesized using solid-phase peptide synthesis strategy by reacting Fmoc-protected building block amino acids on the free amino group at the His-(Trt)-Cl-2-chlorotrityl resin. Peptide synthesis was accomplished and optimized by using three equivalents of Fmoc-protected amino acids and 2-(6-chloro-1H-benzotriazole-1-yl)-1,1,3,3-tetramethylammoniumhexafluorophosphate/N,N-diisopropylethylamine (HCTU/DIPEA) in N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) (Scheme 1 and Table 1). After assembly of synthesized peptides, they were cleaved using freshly prepared cleavage cocktail and were characterized using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectroscopy (MALDI) analysis, which confirmed their molecular weights under the positive linear mode of MALDI mass spectrometry. Reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) was employed for the purification of crude peptides, followed by lyophilization to obtain a dry white powder for all synthesized peptides showing ≥ 95% purity. Then, oleic acid was conjugated to the peptides using a similar procedure with a reaction with fully protected peptide-attached resin before cleavage and deprotection. However, the coupling time was increased as compared with coupling amino acids on peptidyl resin. A Kaiser test was used to verify that the coupling process was fully completed and all N-terminal amino groups had been reacted. The hydrophobicity of the peptides varied based on the number of W residues and the presence of an alkyl chain from oleic acid acylation at the N-terminus. The synthesis and purification of oleyl-(WRH)₄ was challenging owing to its increased hydrophobicity due to the presence of four W residues and one oleyl chain. This led us to fix the solubility issue of the oleyl-conjugated peptides by dissolving them using an excess mixture of solvent (Acetonitrile: H₂O, 70:30 v/v).

2.2. Zeta Potential and Particle Size Analysis

The zeta potential demonstrates the complexes' net surface charge, which is crucial for their stability and interactions with biological systems. We used the Smoluchowski model to calculate the zeta potential values. To ensure precision and dependability, all measurements were performed at 40 V using disposable folded capillary cells in duplicates, with 20 repeats per measurement. The N/P ratio represents the molar ratio of protonatable nitrogen (N) atoms found in cationic components of peptide to anionic phosphate groups (P) in siRNA. The data below indicates that the peptide:siRNA complexes show an overall positive zeta potential value ranging from ~13 mV to ~18 mV at N/P ratio 40 (Figure 2), demonstrating relatively stable complexes (Table 2). The increasing number of R residues led to a slight enhancement in the zeta potential values.

Particle size analyses were performed using automatic attenuator settings at the same N/P ratios and siRNA doses as dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis. This investigation intended to examine the complexes’ size features in more detail. Lower values of the polydispersity index (PDI), a measurement of nanosuspension's physical stability, indicate a more desired, restricted size distribution. A PDI score above 0.5 indicates a broad distribution, whereas one between 0.1 and 0.25 indicates a somewhat tight distribution. As demonstrated in Table 3, the PDI values in this investigation of about 0.2 suggested minimum aggregation of the complexes. The particle size of all the synthesized non-oleyl conjugated and oleyl conjugated peptide complexes was observed to be ranging from ~58 nm to ~79 nm at an N/P ratio of 40 (Figure 3, Table 3). The observable decline in a trend may be attributed to the rising presence of R residues and the presence of oleic acid fatty acyl chain.

All peptides formed stable nano-complexes with siRNA with a hydrodynamic diameter <79 nm at an N/P ratio of 40 and positive zeta potential values, which are important attributes for a successful siRNA delivery system. The ability of the peptides to form complexes within the nano-range could positively contribute to the intracellular uptake of siRNA in various cells. Figure 3 shows particle size evaluation of peptide:siRNA at different N/P ratios, suggesting reduced size at higher N/P ratios with higher concentration of positively charged residues, presumably with higher interaction with negatively charged siRNA.

2.3. Gel Retardation Assays for Binding Affinity

The gel retardation assay was used to measure the binding affinity between the oleyl-conjugated peptides and scrambled siRNA. The complexes were created with final siRNA concentrations of 36 nM at various N/P ratios ranging from 0 to 60. The next step was conducting 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, followed by ethidium bromide staining. Using Image LabTM software, the bands that represented unbound siRNA were measured for intensity. This assay enabled us to evaluate the extent to which the peptides bind and safeguard the siRNA during delivery. All the peptide conjugates except (WRH)₁ and oleyl-(WRH)₁ showed adequate retardation of siRNA at N/P ratio ≥40 (Figure 4). At N/P ratio 0, all the siRNA was represented as a thick band, but the increase in peptide concentration in the complexes (N/P ratio) led to an increase in the binding of siRNA, meaning 100% of siRNA bound at N/P ratio ≥40. The siRNA bound with oleyl conjugated peptide was represented by the decrease in band intensity, thereby retarding the movement of siRNA in the gel, as shown in the images from Figure 4. siRNA bands start to disappear at different N/P ratios for different peptides, which means that the siRNA binds completely with the peptide at that specific N/P ratio. According to Figure 4, peptides (WRH)₁ and oleyl-(WRH)₁ did not bind with siRNA up to N/P ratio 60, which is a very low binding affinity as compared to that of the other peptides in the pool. As the no. of R residues increased, the peptide:siRNA binding was observed. The presence of R residues mostly correlated well with the increase in binding affinity of the non-oleyl- and oleyl-conjugated peptides towards siRNA.

3.4. Protection of siRNA against Enzymatic Degradation

The peptide:siRNA complexes were exposed to a 25% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS) solution in Hank's Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) to evaluate the protective qualities of oleyl-conjugated peptides against enzymatic degradation. The final concentration of siRNA used in the complexes was 36 nM, while the N/P ratios used in their preparation ranged from 0 to 60. The heparin competition assay was used to separate the peptide-siRNA complexes and determine how much intact siRNA was present after the complexes had been incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. This assay offered a trustworthy method for evaluating the stability of the complexes and the level of resistance to enzymatic degradation provided by the oleyl-conjugated peptides. The intensity of the bands corresponding to intact siRNA was measured following gel electrophoresis using ethidium bromide staining.

The acquired results provided information on the ability of oleyl-conjugated peptides to shield siRNA from enzymatic degradation when FBS was present. While unmodified (WRH)₁ was inefficient at all N/P ratios (Figure 5), all the other studied peptides showed a comparable efficiency towards the protection of siRNA from enzymatic degradation at N/P ratio ≥ 5 (Figure 5). The data indicate the potential of these peptides as protective carriers for effective siRNA delivery, as shown by analyzing siRNA stability inside the complex following exposure to FBS. The peptides with a higher number of R residues presumably have strong binding with siRNA, and protect siRNA against enzymatic degradation, especially at higher N/P ratios.

3.5. In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Peptide-siRNA Complexes

The study aimed to assess these complexes' potential as a delivery system for siRNA-mediated gene silencing in cancer cells. Our initial experiments involved the use of the MDA-MB-231 (Figure 6A), MCF-7 (Figure 6B), SK-OV-3 (Figure 7A), and HEK-293 (Figure 7B) cell lines for cell culture and in vitro cytotoxicity studies. After 72 h of incubation, we used an MTS test to determine the cytotoxicity of the developed peptides complexed with scrambled siRNA. The peptide-siRNA complexes were applied to the cells at various concentrations and N/P ratios (from 10 to 100).

The outcomes demonstrated that the peptide-siRNA complexes displayed variable degrees of cytotoxicity depending on the cell line and N/P ratio utilized. The cytotoxicity data are represented below in Figure 6. The data demonstrated that all peptide-siRNA complexes showed no significant cytotoxicity as compared to non-treated cells in all the cell lines up to N/P ratio 80. However, with an increase in the N/P ratio, the complexes showed dose-dependent cytotoxicity in all the above-mentioned cell lines. Therefore, N/P ratio of 40 was selected as a safer ratio of peptide-siRNA complexes for the remaining cell assays to ensure the cells were viable during the experiments.

3.6. Cellular Internalization of siRNA Using Flow Cytometry

Based on the binding affinity, stability, and gel retardation assays, the peptides were examining the cellular delivery of siRNA. We performed a flow cytometry experiment to examine the cellular uptake of non-oleyl and oleyl-conjugated peptide-siRNA complexes by monitoring the Alexa Fluor 488-labeled scrambled siRNA. This study was carried out on the cell lines MDA-MB-231 and SK-OV-3 (Figure 8 and Figure 9). After being exposed to the complexes for 24 h, the cells were trypsinized, cleaned, and subjected to flow cytometry analysis. The flow cytometry analysis provided quantitative evidence for cellular internalization of siRNA up to ~60% and ~75% using oleyl-(WRH)₃ and oleyl-(WRH)₄, respectively, at N/P ratios 40 after 24 h of incubation, in both MDA-MB-231 and SK-OV-3 cells (Figure 8 and Figure 9). A significant increase in mean fluorescent intensity and the siRNA uptake by the cells with a higher number of R residues was observed where oleyl-(WRH)₄ demonstrated the highest cellular internalization when compared with other peptides, presumably because of the stronger interactions of these peptides with negatively charged siRNA and cell membrane phospholipid bilayer. Furthermore, the addition of the oleyl fatty acyl chain enhanced the siRNA delivery, possibly due to higher interactions with hydrophobic residues in the cell membrane. A comparable difference in the cellular uptake of lipofectamine and oleyl-(WRH)₄ was observed. These results imply that the oleyl-conjugated peptides efficiently promoted siRNA uptake into the cancer cells.

3.7. Cellular Internalization Study of siRNA Using Confocal Microscopy

A siRNA uptake investigation utilizing confocal microscopy was conducted to corroborate the flow cytometry data. We performed microscopy in the cells according to the previously reported procedure [20]. Based on the binding affinity, stability, gel retardation, and flow cytometry assays, oleyl-(WRH)₃ and oleyl-(WRH)₄ were selected for examining the cellular delivery of siRNA using confocal microscopy compared to non-oleyl (WRH)₃ and (WRH)₄. After treatment, rigorous washing of cells was performed to ensure complete elimination of any peptide:siRNA complexes on the cell surface before fixing the cells and subsequent staining to visualize the cellular uptake of siRNA in the cells. Figure 10 and Figure 11 demonstrate the intracellular delivery of siRNA by cells using peptides oleyl-(WRH)₃ and oleyl-(WRH)₄ at N/P ratio of 40. The cellular uptake for lipofectamine, oleyl-(WRH)₃, and oleyl-(WRH)₄ was more significant in MDA-MB-231 cells than that of SK-OV-3 cells. Both oleyl-(WRH)₃ and oleyl-(WRH)₄ exhibited cytosolic delivery. These data indicate that the peptides are promising siRNA delivery agents for both breast and ovarian cancer cells. These data were consistent with flow cytometry data.

3.8. Protein Silencing Effect of siRNA (Western Blot)

STAT-3 exhibits a notable overexpression in several cancer types, including breast and ovarian cancer. Thus, it was chosen as the model protein [13]. By examining the expression of STAT-3 in peptide-siRNA complex-treated cells, the silencing efficiency of STAT-3 siRNA delivered by oleyl-conjugated peptides was determined. Peptide-siRNA complexes were treated with MDA-MB-231 and SK-OV-3 cells for 48 h at a final siRNA concentration of 50 nM. Protein concentration was established after preparing cell lysates.

Compared to the non-treated cells, results showed that STAT-3 expression was significantly lower in those treated with oleyl-(WRH)₄-siRNA complexes. Considering that the expression of STAT-3 gene in non-treated cells is 100%, the commercially available Lipofectamine 2000 showed ~87% silencing of STAT3. Oleyl-(WRH)₃ showed no silencing, while ~75% downregulation of STAT3 was observed in the presence of oleyl-(WRH)₄ in MDA-MB-231 cells (Figure 12A).

Furthermore, to evaluate and confirm the gene silencing efficiency of the oleyl-conjugated peptides in a different cell line, the peptides were targeted and evaluated using ovarian cancer (SK-OV-3) cells. The positive control for the experiment Lipofectamine 2000 silenced the STAT3 gene by ~75%. Oleyl conjugated peptide oleyl-(WRH)₃ showed no silencing, but oleyl-(WRH)₄ successfully exhibited ~45% silencing of STAT-3 in SK-OV-3 cells (Figure 12B). These results demonstrate that the oleyl-conjugated peptide-siRNA complexes were successfully delivered into the cells, where they specifically downregulated the target protein STAT-3. While oleyl-(WRH)4 was less effective than lipofectamine in inducing silencing effects, its non-cytotoxic nature could be advantageous for this application. Moreover, this peptide can be potentially optimized through structural modifications to enhance its silencing effectiveness.

3. Conclusion

In this study, we synthesized and characterized linear peptides with W, R, and H residues and fatty acylated them using oleic acid on solid-phase peptide synthesis. To facilitate siRNA delivery, peptides were mixed with scrambled siRNA that formed stable nano-complexes with hydrodynamic diameters below 79 nm and positive zeta potentials. Analyzed by dynamic light scattering, these complexes exhibited positive zeta potentials (13-18 mV) and sizes ranging from 58 to 79 nm, indicating a desirable size distribution. Gel retardation assays confirmed 100% siRNA binding at an N/P ratio of 40. Peptide-siRNA complexes, particularly oleyl-conjugated peptides, demonstrated resistance to enzymatic degradation. Cytotoxicity studies on various cancer cell lines revealed minimal cytotoxicity at N/P ratio ≤80, with efficient cellular uptake observed in MDA-MB-231 and SK-OV-3 cells. Confocal microscopy confirmed cellular uptake, and the oleyl-(WRH)₄ complex effectively downregulated STAT-3 expression in both cell lines, showcasing its successful gene-silencing capabilities. These findings highlight the potential of oleyl-conjugated peptides as effective siRNA delivery vehicles for targeted gene silencing in cancer cells, warranting further optimization and in vivo exploration.

3.1. Materials

The amino acid building blocks Fmoc-His(Trt)-OH, Fmoc-Arg(Pbf)-OH, and Fmoc-Trp(Boc)-OH were obtained from AAPPTec LLC (Louisville, KY, USA). The resin H-His-(Trt)-Cl-2-chlorotrityl (loading capacity = 0.724 mmol/g) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Coupling reagents, including HCTU, DMF, DIPEA, trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), acetic acid, triisoproylsilane (TIS), and piperidine were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. (Milwaukee, WI, USA) and used without further purification. F′-siRNA (Catalog #: AM4635-AM4636) was obtained from Ambion Inc. (Austin, TX, USA). All cell biology reagents were procured from Wilken Scientific (Pawtucket, RI, USA) or Fisher Scientific (Hanover Park, IL, USA).

The chemical structures of the peptides were confirmed by analyzing their masses using a high-resolution matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometer (model # GT 0264, Bruker Inc., Fremont, CA, USA) in positive ion mode with α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid as the matrix. Crude peptide purification was carried out using a reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) system (Shimadzu LC-20AP, Canby, OR, USA) equipped with a Waters XBridge BEH130 preparative column (10 µm, 110 Å, 21.2 × 250 mm), employing a gradient elution of acetonitrile and water with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA, v/v) at a flow rate of 6 mL/min, and monitored at 220 nm.

Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS), fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin (10,000 U/mL), and streptomycin (10 mg/mL) were supplied by Life Technologies (Grand Island, NY, USA). Western blot materials, including 10% Mini-PROTEAN® TGX Stain-Free Protein Gels, Clarity Western ECL Substrate, Trans-blot® Turbo TM Cassettes, and Trans-Blot® Turbo Mini PVDF Transfer Packs, were obtained from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA, USA). 4,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) was provided by Vector Laboratories (Burlingame, CA, USA). Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, 20x concentration), sulforhodamine 101 (Texas Red), and other chemicals were purchased from VWR (Radnor, PA, USA). Scrambled negative control siRNA (Catalogue no. AM4635), Alexa Fluor 488-labeled negative control siRNA (Catalogue no. 1027292), and siRNA targeting STAT3 (Catalogue no. SI02662338) were acquired from Thermo Fisher. Monoclonal antibodies against STAT3 (Mouse, Catalogue no. 9139S) and GAPDH (Mouse, Catalogue no. 97166S) were supplied by Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. (Danvers, MA, USA). Mouse IgG HRP-conjugated antibody was purchased from R&D Systems (Catalogue no. HAF007).

3.2. Solid-Phase Peptide Synthesis of Unmodified and Oleyl-Conjugated Peptides

The peptides were synthesized via Fmoc/tBu solid-phase peptide synthesis, following the procedures detailed in previously reported methods [18], exemplified in Scheme 1. In summary, the synthesis utilized preloaded H-His-(Trt)-Cl-2-chlorotrityl resin (loading capacity = 0.724 mmol/g) as the solid support. Peptides containing alternating tryptophan, arginine, and histidine residues were synthesized on a 0.50 mmol scale, following the specified peptide sequence. Subsequently, complete cleavage was achieved by incubating with a freshly prepared cleavage cocktail reagent R (trifluoroacetic acid (TFA): thioanisole: anisole: dithiothreitol (DTT) (92:5:2:3; v/v/v/v)) for 4 hours to obtain non-oleyl peptides.

For the oleyl-conjugated peptides, following the conjugation of the last amino acid and Fmoc deprotection steps, N-terminal acylation with oleic acid was carried out in the presence of HCTU/DIPEA. The resin was thoroughly washed with DMF. Fmoc deprotection was achieved using piperidine (20% v/v) in DMF, and the Kaiser test confirmed completion of the coupling process with all free amino groups reacted. Finally, all peptide conjugates were cleaved using a freshly prepared cleavage cocktail reagent R (TFA: thioanisole: anisole: DTT, 92:5:2:3; v/v/v/v) for 4 h.

All crude peptides were precipitated using cold diethyl ether, centrifuged, and subsequently purified using reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) on a Shimadzu LC-20AP Prominence system. The purification utilized a gradient elution system consisting of water with 0.1% TFA and acetonitrile (CH₃CN) with 0.1% TFA (v/v) (5% to 95% CH₃CN over 60 min) on a C18 column (00G-4436-P0-AX, Gemini Prep C18, 10 μm particle size). Fractions were collected and analyzed using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Fractions containing the expected compounds were pooled and lyophilized to obtain solid peptide powders. Analytical HPLC was conducted to confirm the purity (>95%) of the most effective compounds used in biological assays. Table 1 outlines the manual peptide synthesis steps.

(WRH)₁: MALDI-TOF (m/z) C₂₃H₃₃N₉O₄ Calculated: 499.2645, Found: 499.4015 [M+2H]⁺; (WRH)₂: MALDI-TOF (m/z) C₄₆H₆₂N₁₈O₇ Calculated: 978.5038, Found: 978.4187 [M+2H]⁺; (WRH)₃: MALDI-TOF (m/z) C₆₉H₉₀N₂₇O₁₀ Calculated: 1456.7358, Found: 1456.5664 [M+H]⁺; (WRH)₄: MALDI-TOF (m/z) C₉₂H₁₁₉N₃₆O₁₃ Calculated: 1935.9752, Found: 1935.6767 [M+H]⁺; Oleyl-(WRH)₁: MALDI-TOF (m/z) C₄₁H₆₅N₉O₅ Calculated: 763.5098, Found: 763.6974 [M+2H]⁺; Oleyl-(WRH)₂: MALDI-TOF (m/z) C₆₄H₉₄N₁₈O₈ Calculated: 1242.7491, Found: 1242.9278 [M+2H]⁺; Oleyl-(WRH)₃: MALDI-TOF (m/z) C₈₇H₁₂₂N₂₇O₁₁ Calculated: 1720.9812, Found: 1720.6871 [M+H]⁺; Oleyl-(WRH)₄: MALDI-TOF (m/z) C₁₁₂H₁₅₂N₃₆O₁₄ Calculated: 2201.2278, Found: 2201.7647 [M+2H]⁺.

3.3. Complex Formation of Oleyl Conjugated Peptides and Scrambled siRNA

The complexation of oleyl-conjugated peptides and siRNA involved physically mixing them together. Appropriate volumes of oleyl-conjugated peptides and scrambled siRNA solutions were combined in Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) buffer to form the complexes. These complexes were formed through ionic interactions between the positively charged arginine residues of the conjugates and the negatively charged phosphate groups of siRNA.

The final concentration of siRNA complexes remained constant, while the concentration of the conjugates was incrementally adjusted to achieve various N/P ratios. The N/P ratio, where N represents the moles of ionizable nitrogen in the delivery agent and P represents the moles of phosphate groups in siRNA, was calculated using the formula:

N/P = (no. of moles of peptide) x (no. of ionized nitrogen atoms) / (no. of moles in siRNA) x 48

3.9. Cellular Uptake Study Using Confocal Microscopy

In light of previous studies demonstrating the use of fixed or live cells for imaging siRNA cellular uptake, confocal microscopy was employed to corroborate data acquired from flow cytometry. Approximately 400,000 MDA-MB-231 cells were seeded on coverslips in 6-well plates and allowed to adhere for 24 h. During this period, cell confluency and health were assessed under a standard microscope.

Peptide-siRNA complexes were prepared with a final siRNA concentration of 36 nM and administered to the cells. Non-treated cells served as the negative control, while lipofectamine-siRNA complexes were employed as the positive control. After 24 h of incubation with the complexes, cells on coverslips were washed thrice with 1X PBS and fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde solution for 30 min at room temperature.

Cell membranes were stained using Texas Red (TR) Phalloidin (Invitrogen) (1:250 in HBSS), and DAPI was used to stain cell nuclei. Images of fixed cells were captured using a Nikon A1R confocal microscope system equipped with a 60X objective and various filters for Alexa-488 (FITC), TR, and DAPI fluorescence channels.

3.10. Protein Silencing Effect of siRNA (Western Blot)

STAT-3 was chosen as the model protein due to its significant overexpression in various types of cancer, including breast cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the silencing efficiency of STAT-3 siRNA delivered via oleyl-conjugated peptides by evaluating STAT-3 expression in cells treated with peptide-siRNA complexes. Non-treated cells served as the negative control, while cells treated with lipofectamine (20 μg/mL) complexed with STAT-3 siRNA (50 nM) served as the positive control.

To evaluate STAT-3 expression, Western blotting was performed. Approximately 500,000 MDA-MB-231 cells were seeded in T-25 flasks and incubated under standard growth conditions at 37°C. After 24 h, cells were treated with peptide-siRNA complexes for 48 hours, with a final siRNA concentration of 50 nM. Cell lysates were prepared using RIPA buffer according to standard protocols, followed by sonication in intervals to ensure complete cell lysis. The lysates were then centrifuged at 12,000 rpm (RCF = 13,870× g) at 4°C for 15 minutes, and the supernatant was transferred to pre-cooled microtubes.

The total protein concentration in the lysates was determined using a BSA assay. Briefly, a working reagent (50:1 A: B) was added to standards and unknown samples in triplicate in a 96-well plate. After mixing and incubating for 30 minutes at 37°C with 5% CO₂, absorbance at 562 nm was measured using a Spectra MAX M5 microplate reader to quantify protein levels.

Approximately 15 μg of protein from each sample was loaded onto a 10% Mini-PROTEAN® TGX Stain-Free protein gel, and electrophoresis was carried out in SDS buffer at 200 V for 30 minutes. The separated proteins were transferred to a Mini PVDF membrane using a Trans-Blot® Turbo system. The membrane was blocked with 5% BSA for 3 h, followed by overnight incubation at 4°C with primary antibody (1:1000 in TBS-T). After washing the membrane with TBS-T, it was incubated with a secondary HRP-linked antibody (1:1000 in TBS-T) for 1 h, followed by additional washing steps.

Protein bands were visualized using an ECL Detect Kit and imaged with a ChemiDoc imager. Band intensities were quantified using Image LabTM software.