Submitted:
09 July 2024
Posted:
10 July 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results and Findings
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
References
- Adams, R.; Behrens, J. The role of trust in supplier relationships: Perspectives from procurement professionals. Journal of Supply Chain Management 2020, 56, 23–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, J. C.; Narus, J. A. A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. Journal of Marketing 1990, 54, 42–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagozzi, R. P.; Yi, Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 1988, 16, 74–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bove, L. L.; Benetton, A. Supplier relationship management: Trust and collaboration in global supply chains. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 2021, 41, 613–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brewer, M. B. Ethnocentrism and its role in interpersonal trust. Psychological Review 1981, 88, 601–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, I. J.; Paulraj, A. Towards a theory of supply chain management: The constructs and measurements. Journal of Operations Management 2004, 22, 119–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, T. Y.; Wu, Z. Triads in supply networks: Theorizing buyer–supplier–supplier relationships. Journal of Operations Management 2009, 27, 247–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doney, P. M.; Cannon, J. P. An examination of the nature of trust in buyer–seller relationships. Journal of Marketing 1997, 61, 35–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dwyer, F. R.; Schurr, P. H.; Oh, S. Developing buyer–seller relationships. Journal of Marketing 1987, 51, 11–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Easton, G. Relationships and networks in construction: Exploring the implications of client expectations. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 2008, 15, 347–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ellis, P. D. Social ties and partner identification in UK venture capital firms. Journal of Business Venturing 2006, 21, 782–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Emon, M. H. A systematic review of the causes and consequences of price hikes in Bangladesh. Review of Business and Economics Studies 2023, 11, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Emon, M. M. H.; Chowdhury, M. S. A. Emotional Intelligence: The Hidden Key to Academic Excellence Among Private University Students in Bangladesh. Malaysian Mental Health Journal 2024, 3, 12–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Emon, M.M.H.; Khan, T.; Siam, S.A.J. Quantifying the influence of supplier relationship management and supply chain performance: an investigation of Bangladesh’s manufacturing and service sectors. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management 2024, 21, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frazier, G. L.; Rody, R. C. The use of influence strategies in interfirm relationships in industrial product channels. Journal of Marketing 1991, 55, 52–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ganesan, S. Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing 1994, 58, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ganesan, S.; Malter, A. J.; Rindfleisch, A. Does distance still matter? Geographic proximity and new product development. Journal of Marketing 2005, 69, 44–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geyskens, I.; Steenkamp, J.-B. E.; Kumar, N. Generalizations about trust in marketing channel relationships using meta-analysis. International Journal of Research in Marketing 1998, 15, 223–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gundlach, G. T.; Achrol, R. S.; Mentzer, J. T. The structure of commitment in exchange. Journal of Marketing 1995, 59, 78–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Handfield, R. B.; Bechtel, C. The role of trust and relationship structure in improving supply chain responsiveness. Industrial Marketing Management 2002, 31, 367–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heide, J. B.; John, G. Do norms matter in marketing relationships? Journal of Marketing 1992, 56, 32–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hutt, M. D.; Speh, T. W. Business marketing management: B2B (10th ed.). Cengage Learning. 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Jap, S. D.; Anderson, E. Safeguarding interorganizational performance and continuity under ex post opportunism. Management Science 2003, 49, 1684–1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jarillo, J. C. On strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal 1988, 9, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katsikeas, C. S.; Skarmeas, D.; Bello, D. C. Developing successful trust-based international exchange relationships. Journal of International Business Studies 2009, 40, 132–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, T.; Emon, M. M. H.; Siam, S. A. J. Impact of Green Supply Chain Practices on Sustainable Development in Bangladesh. Malaysian Business Management Journal 2024, 3, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, T.; Emon, M. M. H.; Rahman, M. A.; Hamid, A. B. A. Internal Branding Essentials: The Roadmap to Organizational Success. Notion Press. 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, T.; Khanam, S. N.; Rahman, M. H.; Rahman, S. M. Determinants of microfinance facility for installing solar home system (SHS) in rural Bangladesh. Energy Policy 2019, 132, 299–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, T.; Rahman, S. M.; Hasan, M. M. Barriers to Growth of Renewable Energy Technology in Bangladesh. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computing Advancements 2020, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lusch, R. F.; Brown, J. R. Interdependency, contracting, and relational behavior in marketing channels. Journal of Marketing 1996, 60, 19–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Macneil, I. R. The new social contract: An inquiry into modern contractual relations. Yale Law Journal 1980, 90, 1287–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morgan, R. M.; Hunt, S. D. The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing 1994, 58, 20–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Narus, J. A.; Anderson, J. C. Rethinking distribution: Adaptive channels. Harvard Business Review 1986, 64, 112–120. [Google Scholar]
- Naudé, P.; Buttle, F. A contingency approach to industrial purchasing and supply chain management. Industrial Marketing Management 2000, 29, 317–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nooteboom, B. Innovation and inter-firm linkages: New implications for policy. Research Policy 1999, 28, 793–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palmatier, R. W.; Dant, R. P.; Grewal, D.; Evans, K. R. Factors influencing the effectiveness of relationship marketing: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing 2006, 70, 136–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Podsakoff, P. M.; MacKenzie, S. B.; Lee, J.-Y.; Podsakoff, N. P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 2003, 88, 879–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rai, A.; Patnayakuni, R.; Seth, N. Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities. Management Science 2006, 52, 833–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ritter, T.; Gemünden, H. G. The impact of a company's business strategy on its technological competence, network competence and innovation success. Journal of Business Research 2004, 57, 548–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schurr, P. H.; Ozanne, J. L. Influences on exchange processes: Buyers' preconceptions of a seller's trustworthiness and bargaining toughness. Journal of Consumer Research 1985, 11, 939–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheth, J. N.; Parvatiyar, A. Relationship marketing in consumer markets: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 1995, 23, 255–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simatupang, T. M.; Sridharan, R. The collaborative supply chain. The International Journal of Logistics Management 2005, 16, 235–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slater, S. F.; Narver, J. C. Market orientation and the learning organization. Journal of Marketing 1995, 59, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soh, C. P.; Hsu, M. K. The path to vendor managed inventory (VMI): Implementation issues in Asia. Industrial Management & Data Systems 2006, 106, 439–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spekman, R. E.; Davis, E. W. Competitive advantage in intercollegiate athletics: Role of the assistant coach. Sport Marketing Quarterly 2004, 13, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taylor, S. A.; Hunter, G. L.; Lindberg, D. L. Understanding supply chain management: Critical research and a theoretical framework. International Journal of Production Research 2010, 48, 3821–3835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilson, D. T.; Jantrania, S. Understanding the value of a relationship. Industrial Marketing Management 1994, 23, 361–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
| Factors | Description |
|---|---|
| Communication | The frequency, clarity, and openness of communication between procurement professionals and suppliers play a crucial role in establishing trust-based relationships. |
| Ethical Conduct | Adherence to ethical standards and fair business practices enhances perceptions of reliability and integrity, fostering trust with suppliers. |
| Relationship History | Previous successful collaborations and shared experiences contribute positively to trust formation by building a foundation of mutual understanding and reliability. |
| Transparency | Transparency in decision-making processes, pricing, and contractual terms promotes trust by reducing uncertainty and enhancing predictability. |
| Cultural Alignment | Alignment of cultural values, norms, and communication styles between parties facilitates understanding and trust-building in cross-cultural contexts. |
| Challenges | Description |
|---|---|
| Perceived Opportunism | Concerns over opportunistic behavior, such as breaches of contract, price gouging, or undisclosed conflicts of interest, undermine trust and strain supplier relationships. |
| Communication Breakdowns | Inadequate or inconsistent communication, misinterpretation of messages, and language barriers hinder effective trust-building efforts between parties. |
| Conflict Resolution | Difficulties in resolving conflicts, disputes, or disagreements in a fair and timely manner can erode trust and escalate tensions within supplier relationships. |
| Power Imbalances | Unequal distribution of power, influence, or resources between parties can create perceptions of unfairness and hinder collaborative efforts to build trust. |
| Regulatory and Compliance Issues | Challenges related to regulatory compliance, legal requirements, and governance practices may complicate trust-building efforts within supplier relationships. |
| Strategies | Description |
|---|---|
| Proactive Engagement | Initiating regular interactions, proactive problem-solving, and engaging in joint planning activities strengthen relational bonds and foster trust with suppliers. |
| Transparent Decision-Making | Openness in decision-making processes, including sharing information on project timelines, budget allocations, and strategic goals, enhances trust and reduces uncertainty. |
| Performance Evaluation | Regular assessment of supplier performance against agreed-upon metrics and expectations reinforces accountability and builds confidence in supplier relationships. |
| Mutual Benefit Alignment | Aligning incentives, goals, and expectations between parties ensures mutual benefit and fosters a collaborative environment conducive to trust-building. |
| Conflict Management | Implementing effective conflict resolution mechanisms and mediation strategies promotes fairness, respect, and trust in addressing disputes and disagreements. |
| Impact Areas | Description |
|---|---|
| Supplier Responsiveness | High levels of trust are associated with increased supplier responsiveness to requests, inquiries, and market changes, enhancing agility and operational flexibility. |
| Reliability and Delivery | Trusted suppliers demonstrate consistent performance, on-time delivery, and adherence to quality standards, reducing supply chain disruptions and enhancing reliability. |
| Innovation Capabilities | Trust fosters collaborative innovation efforts, enabling suppliers to contribute expertise, ideas, and solutions that drive product development and market competitiveness. |
| Cost Efficiency | Trusted supplier relationships often lead to cost efficiencies through streamlined processes, reduced transaction costs, and optimized resource allocation strategies. |
| Long-term Sustainability | Trusted partnerships contribute to long-term sustainability by promoting stability, resilience, and mutual commitment to achieving shared environmental and social goals. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).