Submitted:
29 June 2024
Posted:
02 July 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract

Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Literature Search Strategy
2.2. Search Strategy
2.3. Article Selection
3. Conceptualization of Patient-Oriented Medical Ontology Conceptual Framework (POMOCF)
3.1. Front-End Framework Objectives and Scope
3.1.1. Objective
3.1.2. Scope
3.2. Front-End Framework Components
| Class | Functionalities |
|---|---|
| User Experience | Designs interfaces for seamless healthcare data interaction. |
| Security and Compliance | Ensures data confidentiality, integrity, and regulatory compliance. |
| Data Management | Organizes, stores, and retrieves healthcare data, ensuring integrity. |
| Interoperability and Integration | Facilitates seamless data exchange across systems and platforms. |
| Advanced Analytics | Utilizes analytics and AI to enhance clinical decision-making. |
| Scalability | Addresses system capacity for growing data volumes and user loads. |
3.3. Front-End Framework Development Process
3.3. Challenges in Developing a POMOCF Front-End Framework
3.3.1. Theoretical Framework Integration and Consistency
3.3.2. Theoretical Concept Applicability and Potential Limitations
4. Discussion
4.1. Significance of Front-End Frameworks
4.2. Next Steps and Case Studies in Using a High-Level Medical Ontology Conceptual Framework for Front-End
4.3. Future Development Strategies for POMOCF Back-End Framework: Bridging Front-End and Back-End Frameworks
4.3.1. Proposed Integration of Medical Ontology across Front-End and Back-End Framework
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Megari, K. Quality of Life in Chronic Disease Patients. Health Psychol. Res. 2013, 1, e27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dobrow, M. Caring for People with Chronic Conditions: A Health System Perspective. Int. J. Integr. Care 2009, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Subbiah, V. The next Generation of Evidence-Based Medicine. Nat. Med. 2023, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wagner, E.H.; Austin, B.T.; Davis, C.; Hindmarsh, M.; Schaefer, J.; Bonomi, A. Improving Chronic Illness Care: Translating Evidence into Action. Health Aff. Proj. Hope 2001, 20, 64–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. Care Coordination. Available online: https://www.ahrq.gov/ncepcr/care/coordination.html (accessed on 25 June 2024).
- Vahdat, S.; Hamzehgardeshi, L.; Hessam, S.; Hamzehgardeshi, Z. Patient Involvement in Health Care Decision Making: A Review. Iran. Red Crescent Med. J. 2014, 16, e12454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Improving the Patient Record The Computer-Based Patient Record: Revised Edition: An Essential Technology for Health Care; Dick, R. S., Steen, E.B., Detmer, D.E., Eds.; National Academies Press (US): Washington (DC), 1997; ISBN 978-0-309-05532-1. [Google Scholar]
- Evans, R.S. Electronic Health Records: Then, Now, and in the Future. Yearb. Med. Inform. 2016, Suppl 1, S48–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- American Medical Association. Meaningful Use: Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs. Available online: https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/medicare-medicaid/meaningful-use-electronic-health-record-ehr-incentive (accessed on 29 March 2024).
- Office-Based Physician Electronic Health Record Adoption | HealthIT.Gov. Available online: https://www.healthit.gov/data/quickstats/office-based-physician-electronic-health-record-adoption (accessed on 3 April 2024).
- Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century; National Academies Press (US): Washington (DC), 2001; ISBN 978-0-309-07280-9.
- Ambalavanan, R.; Snead, R.S.; Marczika, J.; Kozinsky, K.; Aman, E. Advancing the Management of Long COVID by Integrating into Health Informatics Domain: Current and Future Perspectives. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2023, 20, 6836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Blobel, B. Authorisation and Access Control for Electronic Health Record Systems. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2004, 73, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pawelek, J.; Baca-Motes, K.; Pandit, J.A.; Berk, B.B.; Ramos, E. The Power of Patient Engagement With Electronic Health Records as Research Participants. JMIR Med. Inform. 2022, 10, e39145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abul-Husn, N.S.; Kenny, E.E. Personalized Medicine and the Power of Electronic Health Records. Cell 2019, 177, 58–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayatollahi, H.; Hosseini, S.F.; Hemmat, M. Integrating Genetic Data into Electronic Health Records: Medical Geneticists’ Perspectives. Healthc. Inform. Res. 2019, 25, 289–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Moher, D. Updating Guidance for Reporting Systematic Reviews: Development of the PRISMA 2020 Statement. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2021, 134, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ouzzani, M.; Hammady, H.; Fedorowicz, Z.; Elmagarmid, A. Rayyan—a Web and Mobile App for Systematic Reviews. Syst. Rev. 2016, 5, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Booth, A.; Clarke, M.; Ghersi, D.; Moher, D.; Petticrew, M.; Stewart, L. An International Registry of Systematic-Review Protocols. The Lancet 2011, 377, 108–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alpert, J.M.; Krist, A.H.; Aycock, R.A.; Kreps, G.L. Designing User-Centric Patient Portals: Clinician and Patients’ Uses and Gratifications. Telemed. J. E-Health Off. J. Am. Telemed. Assoc. 2017, 23, 248–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Williams, M.S.; Taylor, C.O.; Walton, N.A.; Goehringer, S.R.; Aronson, S.; Freimuth, R.R.; Rasmussen, L.V.; Hall, E.S.; Prows, C.A.; Chung, W.K.; et al. Genomic Information for Clinicians in the Electronic Health Record: Lessons Learned From the Clinical Genome Resource Project and the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics Network. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hägglund, M.; McMillan, B.; Whittaker, R.; Blease, C. Patient Empowerment through Online Access to Health Records. BMJ 2022, 378, e071531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ehrenstein, V.; Kharrazi, H.; Lehmann, H.; Taylor, C.O. Obtaining Data From Electronic Health Records. Tools and Technologies for Registry Interoperability, Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User’s Guide, 3rd Edition, Addendum 2 [Internet], /: for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), 2019. Available online: https, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Pritchard, D.E.; Moeckel, F.; Villa, M.S.; Housman, L.T.; McCarty, C.A.; McLeod, H.L. Strategies for Integrating Personalized Medicine into Healthcare Practice. Pers. Med. 2017, 14, 141–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ferreira, D.C.; Vieira, I.; Pedro, M.I.; Caldas, P.; Varela, M. Patient Satisfaction with Healthcare Services and the Techniques Used for Its Assessment: A Systematic Literature Review and a Bibliometric Analysis. Healthc. Basel Switz. 2023, 11, 639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jha, A.K.; DesRoches, C.M.; Campbell, E.G.; Donelan, K.; Rao, S.R.; Ferris, T.G.; Shields, A.; Rosenbaum, S.; Blumenthal, D. Use of Electronic Health Records in U.S. Hospitals. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 360, 1628–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, A.Y.; Arabandi, S.; Beale, T.; Duncan, W.D.; Hicks, A.; Hogan, W.R.; Jensen, M.; Koppel, R.; Martínez-Costa, C.; Nytrø, Ø.; et al. Improving the Quality and Utility of Electronic Health Record Data through Ontologies. Stand. Basel Switz. 2023, 3, 316–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tiase, V.L.; Hull, W.; McFarland, M.M.; Sward, K.A.; Del Fiol, G.; Staes, C.; Weir, C.; Cummins, M.R. Patient-Generated Health Data and Electronic Health Record Integration: A Scoping Review. JAMIA Open 2020, 3, 619–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Torab-Miandoab, A.; Samad-Soltani, T.; Jodati, A.; Rezaei-Hachesu, P. Interoperability of Heterogeneous Health Information Systems: A Systematic Literature Review. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 2023, 23, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dullabh, P.; Hovey, L.; Heaney-Huls, K.; Rajendran, N.; Wright, A.; Sittig, D.F. Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) in Health Care: Findings from a Current-State Assessment. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2019, 265, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Houssein, E.H.; Ibrahem, N.; Zaki, A.M.; Sayed, A. Semantic Protocol and Resource Description Framework Query Language: A Comprehensive Review. Mathematics 2022, 10, 3203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gandon, F.; Krummenacher, R.; Han, S.-K.; Toma, I. The Resource Description Framework and Its Schema; Handbook of Semantic Web Technologies, 2011; ISBN 978-3-540-92912-3.
- Zheng, F.; Shi, J.; Cui, L. A Lexical-Based Approach for Exhaustive Detection of Missing Hierarchical IS-A Relations in SNOMED CT. AMIA. Annu. Symp. Proc. 2021, 2020, 1392–1401. [Google Scholar]
- Oliveira, N.R. de; Santos, Y. de R. dos; Mendes, A.C.R.; Barbosa, G.N.N.; Oliveira, M.T. de; Valle, R.; Medeiros, D.S.V.; Mattos, D.M.F. Storage Standards and Solutions, Data Storage, Sharing, and Structuring in Digital Health: A Brazilian Case Study. Information 2024, 15, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]



| Criteria | Inclusion | Exclusion |
|---|---|---|
| Chronic Conditions | Cardiovascular disease, diabetes, asthma, HIV/AIDS, mental health disorders, sensory impairments, musculoskeletal disorders, oncological conditions | Research not related to chronic conditions or PCC principles |
| PCC | Focus on patient empowerment, engagement, and active involvement in treatment and health management | Studies not directly related to healthcare information management or PCC principles |
| EHRs | EHRs, computerized medical records, clinical information systems, health information systems, hospital information systems | Basic science aspects of genomics or ontology without direct relevance to healthcare delivery |
| Genomic Data Integration | Integrating genomic data for personalized and efficient medical practices | Studies not published in English or lacking full-text availability |
| Ontology Integration | Improving data interoperability and semantic web technologies in healthcare settings | Letters to the editor, commentary, opinion pieces, or non-original research articles |
| Healthcare Quality, Delivery, and Outcomes | Research influenced by PCC principles and integrated healthcare frameworks | Research not aligned with improving healthcare quality, patient outcomes and data interoperability |
| Data Exchange and Interoperability | Data exchange protocols, database design, interoperability standards | Literature reviews, surveys, observational studies, and systematic reviews |
| Study Types | Original research findings on healthcare information management | Cross-sectional, trial, cohort, retrospective, case report studies, in vitro or animal studies, meta-analyses |
| Study Subjects | Studies with healthy controls, age-matched comparisons, single-arm designs, transgenic animals, cadavers, and specific breeds | |
| Sample Types | Research involving porcine, fish, soil samples, or cellular analysis |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).