Preprint
Review

How to Survive without Water? A Short Lesson from Desiccation Tolerance of the Budding Yeast

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Submitted:

22 June 2024

Posted:

24 June 2024

You are already at the latest version

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Abstract
Water is essential for all life on earth. It is a major component that makes up living organisms and plays a vital role in multiple biological processes. It provides a medium for chemical and enzymatic reactions in the cell and is a major player for osmoregulation and maintenance of cell turgidity. Despite this, many organisms, called anhydrobiotes, are capable of surviving under extremely dehydrated conditions. Less is known about how anhydrobiotes adapt and survive under the desiccation stress. Studies have shown that morphological and physiological changes occur in anhydrobiotes in response to desiccation stress. Certain disaccharides and proteins, including heat shock proteins, intrinsically disordered proteins, and hydrophilins, play important roles in the desiccation tolerance of the anhydrobiotes. In this review, we summarize the recent findings of the desiccation tolerance in the budding yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We also propose that the yeast under desiccation could be used as a model to study neurodegenerative disorders.
Keywords: 
Anhydrobiotes; Desiccation stress; Desiccation tolerance; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Survival
Subject: 
Biology and Life Sciences  -   Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

1. Introduction

Water is the most abundant, yet essential molecule in all living organisms on earth, making up about 60-90% of the total mass in living organisms [1]. It is essential not only for life on earth but even in the search for life on other planets; it serves as an important biotic indicator [2]. Water functions as a solvent and is required for many biological processes. When organisms do not have water, the consequences are detrimental. Certain organisms, however, can survive with minimal water for long periods of time. These organisms are commonly called anhydrobiotes, which are a group of unique organisms that can survive anhydrobiosis, or, life without water [3]. Understanding how anhydrobiotes respond and mitigate the stress caused by desiccation could help us better understand stress biology. It is particularly important as today’s climate change occurs more dramatically, and water resources become scarcer.
The capacity of resistance to desiccation is not limited to one species. Anhydrobiotes have been identified in bacteria, yeast, plants, and small animals, such as tardigrades, which can survive for years without water [3,4]. Plant seeds, for example, lose up to 95% of water during maturation and maintain their viability under harsh environmental conditions [5]. Tardigrades can not only survive near complete desiccation, but also other environmental extremes, such as high vacuum, high/low temperature and UV radiation [6]. The budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae can also survive desiccation and has been widely used in the industry of bakery and brewing and other biotech fields [7].
Desiccation imposes a variety of stresses to the organism, such as osmotic stress, oxidative stress, and DNA damage stress. These stresses are likely interconnected and provide cross-protections between different stresses. Transient heat shock, for example, significantly increases desiccation tolerance of the desiccation-sensitive yeast cells [8]. Other stresses, such as osmotic or oxidative stress have less of an impact on desiccation tolerance, suggesting the cross-protection is not equal among different stresses. A similar gene expression profile is observed when budding yeast is imposed with different environmental stresses [9], further suggesting the interconnections among different stresses.
Anhydrobiotes, such as yeast, go through many preconditioning steps to acquire desiccation tolerance. During these preconditioning steps, they undergo a range of morphological and physiological changes such as thickened cell walls and accumulation of stress proteins to prepare themselves for desiccation tolernace [10,11]. In addition, cells have shown metabolic changes to promote survival, using food reservoirs and reducing metabolic activities. Certain metabolic pathways, such as the fatty acid oxidation pathway, become more apparent during the desiccation process [12]. Some metabolic processes could be halted during desiccation [13].
In this review, we briefly discuss recent findings of the desiccation stress and stress response of anhydrobiotes, specifically of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We attempt to address two major questions: how do anhydrobiotes acquire desiccation tolerance; and how do anhydrobiotes maintain life during the desiccated state. In addition, we briefly discuss the feasibility of using desiccated yeast as a model to study prion diseases, which share certain common features with desiccated yeast, like protein misfolding [14].

2. How Anhydrobiotes Acquire Desiccation Tolerance

2.1. No Pain, No Gain—Low Stress Produces More Tolerance

Tolerance to oxidative stress is significantly enhanced when yeast cells are first exposed to low levels of oxidative stress [15]. Similarly, the desiccation tolerance for anhydrobiotes is not innate. They must go through a ‘painful’ process, i.e., experiencing a low level of stress in order to gain desiccation tolerance - the capacity of surviving with severe water loss. This stress may or may not be directly related to desiccation. In plants, for example, acquisition of desiccation tolerance is triggered by gradual dehydration and an increase in the production of abscisic acid [16,17]. Nematodes (Caenorhabditis elegans) gain their desiccation tolerance by going through starvation to induce dauer larvae, followed by initial dehydration at high relative humidity (pre-conditioning) [18,19]. Preconditioning is also required for tardigrades to gain desiccation tolerance by initial slow drying [20,21]. Desiccation tolerance in yeast is commonly induced via starvation by growing cells into stationary phase when cells significantly reduce their metabolic level [22]. Under starvation, diploid yeast cells undergo meiosis and form spores, which are resistant to a wide range of harsh environmental stresses, such as UV radiation, varying temperature, and desiccation [23].
Compared to stationary (starved) cells, dividing yeast cells growing in a rich medium (log-phase) have minimal tolerance to desiccation with a survival rate ranging from 0.0001% to 10%, depending on the desiccation method [12,22]. One intriguing question is: who are these ‘lucky’ surviving cells and why they are so ‘lucky’? Our recent study revealed that these ‘lucky’ cells share a few unique characteristics, including: 1). They are all replicative young cells; 2). They are all in the G1 phase of the cell cycle; 3). They all have condensed chromosomes. The condensed chromosome suggests that genes are more silenced, which is confirmed by the low metabolic activities of these cells [24] (Figure 1). One possibility is this could be a feature developed through evolution, in which a small portion of cells is always prepared to encounter the unpredicted and sudden changes of their environment.
Cell cycle arrest has also been reported in both plants [25,26] and algae during desiccation [27]. DNA synthesis is repressed, and the new cycle of cell division is halted upon desiccation stress. Down-regulation of cell cycle associated transcripts is observed in the desiccation-tolerant microalgae, Klebsormidium. Under desiccated conditions, cells arrest at the G1 checkpoint, preventing entry into S phase where DNA replication occurs [27]. Desiccation causes DNA damage due to the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and other stressors, so the cell cycle arrest helps with coordinating DNA repair mechanisms [28]. Failure of the cell cycle arrest results in cell death [29,30]. These studies suggest that cell cycle and stress response pathways are interconnected, with many stress response genes being regulated in a cell cycle-dependent manner. For example, certain transcription factors involved in the stress response, like Msn2/4, are regulated by cell cycle-dependent mechanisms. These factors can activate the expression of genes encoding protective proteins, such as chaperones and antioxidants, which help cells cope with desiccation stress [31].

2.2. Morphological and Physiological Changes in Response to Desiccation Stress

2.2.1. Morphological Changes

In response to stress, anhydrobiotes make significant morphological and physiological changes to prepare themselves for harsher conditions. In yeast, starvation stress leads to a thickened cell wall that is more thermotolerant and more resistant to enzymatic digestion [32]. Their metabolic level is also significantly reduced [33]. Stationary cells have more mitochondria because they have to use ethanol as their carbon source since glucose is being depleted. Most of the stationary cells also accumulate more lipid droplets, which consists primarily of the neutral lipids, triacylglycerols and steryl esters, as a reservoir for energy [34]. When they are re-introduced into fresh nutrients, the lipids are quickly consumed before cells use external nutrients for cellular growth [35].
Desiccation stress to stationary yeast cells causes further structural changes [36,37,38]. These changes include altered cell walls, altered cellular and nuclear membranes and a reduction in cell size. Desiccation also induces oxidative stress, which in turn causes DNA and membrane damages [39]. Using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), we recently showed that desiccation in yeast triggers endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and unfolded protein response [12]. The ER is misfolded and the nuclear membrane is ruptured (Figure 2). Vacuoles are not readily observed in desiccated yeast cells. In C. elegans, structural damage, including damage to the cell and mitochondrial membrane, is observed in desiccation-sensitive dauers, or desiccation-tolerant dauers without proper preconditioning [19].

2.2.2. Physiological Changes

Like structural changes in anhydrobiotes, many physiological changes occur during the preconditioning, or the initial low stress stage. Starvation stress leads to a significant decrease of metabolism within the cells and an increased accumulation of proteins and non-reducing disaccharides that function as stress effectors, including hydrophilins, heat shock proteins and trehalose. These proteins and non-reducing disaccharides help to preserve both membrane and protein structure as well as prevent protein misfolding [10,11].
Stress proteins: Stress proteins are composed of three intertwined protein families: heat shock proteins (HSPs), intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) and hydrophilins. HSPs are molecular chaperones that contribute to the maintenance of cellular homeostasis by facilitating the refolding of misfolded proteins. They are broadly categorized based on their molecular weights, including: Hsp40 (~40 kDa), Hsp60 (57–65 kDa), Hsp70 (68–80 kDa), Hsp90 (83–99 kDa), and small HSPs (15–40 kDa) [40]. HSPs also play crucial roles in stress response. Many HSPs are induced upon stresses including heat, osmotic, oxidative and desiccation stress [41,42,43]. The yeast small heat shock protein Hsp12p, for example, protects against desiccation stress by interacting with the plasma membrane and protecting the membrane structure during desiccation [44]. The disaggregase Hsp104p also enhances yeast desiccation tolerance. Interestingly, this enhancement is accomplished only in cooperation with the disaccharide trehalose [45]. Hsp70p levels are increased upon stress, but no correlation was observed between Hsp70p increase and desiccation tolerance in yeast [46]. It would be interesting to see if Hsp70p requires other stress effectors to function. Correlation of Hsp70p level and desiccation has also been reported in other organisms. In the green algae Klebsormidium, Hsp70 gene was upregulated in desiccation-tolerant strains upon desiccation stress [27]. In the brine shrimp Artemia, knockdown of the Hsp70 gene reduces the viability of desiccated cysts [47].
Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are a large and functionally important family of proteins characterized by their lack of stable three-dimensional structures yet existent in multiple interconverting conformational states. Many IDPs can change to a fixed tertiary structure after binding to other proteins or RNA [48]. IDPs play important roles in many biological processes, including cell organization, development, and stress tolerance [10,49]. The tardigrade-specific IDPs are essential and sufficient for desiccation tolerance [10]. The late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins are plant specific IDPs and facilitate the stabilization of membranes during desiccation, which enhances the desiccation tolerance of plant seeds [50]. In yeast, the IDP Hsp12p interacts with the plasma membrane and protects membrane structures against desiccation stress [44]. Hsp12p also synergizes with trehalose to mitigate protein aggregation and desiccation stress [11].
Hydrophilins are a group of proteins characterized with high glycine content (> 6%) and high hydrophilicity index (> 1.0) [51,52]. Hydrophilins often include intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) partially due to their high content of glycine, a disorder-promoting residue [11]. Genes encoding hydrophilins are induced by osmotic stress, suggesting that these proteins play a role in response to water loss, or desiccation stress. Twelve hydrophilin proteins have been identified in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Their possible involvement in desiccation stress is listed in Table 1. While the molecular mechanism in stress protection of many hydrophilins is not well studied, it is believed that they act to stabilize proteins and membranes during desiccation [53]. Studies have shown that both Sip18p [52] and Stf2p [53] enhance desiccation tolerance by reducing the ROS level during desiccation stress.
Proteins that are not HSPs, IDPs or hydrophilins may also be involved in membrane stability. The cortical ER protein Ist2p, for example, connects ER to plasma membrane and stabilizes the membrane during desiccation stress. Ist2p also plays a key role in sustaining or restoring the plasma membrane structure during rehydration [54].
Table 1. Yeast hydrophilins and their possible roles in desiccation stress.
Table 1. Yeast hydrophilins and their possible roles in desiccation stress.
GENE ID GENE NAME POSSIBLE ROLE IN (DESICCICATION) RESISTANCE REFERENCES
YJL184W GON7 Involved in cell wall mannoprotein biosynthesis and osmotic stress response. [55]
YMR175W SIP18 Involved in osmotic and desiccation stress response. [56,57]
YMR260C TIF11 Localizes to cytoplasmic stress granule; desiccation resistance increases in mutant. [8,58]
YFL014W HSP12 Plant LEA-like protein, involved in plasma membrane organization and response to multiple stresses, including desiccation stress. [44]
YDL213C NOP6 Required for desiccation-rehydration process. [53]
YGR008C STF2 Involved in cellular response to desiccation, oxidation, and DNA replication stress. [53]
YBR016W CPP1 Involved in the adaptive response to hyperosmotic stress. Detailed biological function unknown. [59]
YPL223C GRE1 Paralog to SIP18. Involved in response to multiple stresses, including osmotic, oxidative, heat shock and desiccation. [60]
YFL010C WWM1 Biological function unknown. Interacts with the caspase-related protease Mca1p. [61]
YJL144W ROQ1 Regulator of the Ubr1p E3 ubiquitin ligase; Involved in osmotic, DNA replication and desiccation stress. [61,62]
YNL162W RPL42A Subunit of the large ribosomal 60S subunit. Function in desiccation stress unknown. [53,63]
YNL190W Cell wall protein; essential for desiccation stress response. [53]
Trehalose: Trehalose is one of the most well-studied stress effectors in desiccation biology. A study showed that both the structure and the dynamics of the dehydrated matrices differ significantly between trehalose (a non-reducing disaccharide) and sucrose (a reducing disaccharide). The dehydrated trehalose matrix is homogeneous whereas the dehydrated sucrose forms a heterogeneous matrix. This unique structure makes trehalose a more effective stabilizer for proteins under stress [64,65].
High concentration of trehalose is found in many anhydrobiotes [66]. In budding yeast, elevated levels of trehalose are found only in stationary cells, which are desiccation tolerant. The trehalose concentration is very low in exponentially growing cells, and these cells are very sensitive to desiccation [22,24]. Stationary yeast cells have a metabolic mode distinct from the exponentially growing cells. Cells growing exponentially use fermentative glycolysis to meet their energetic and biosynthetic needs. When glucose is depleted, cells are transitioned to respiratory metabolism, primarily using ethanol as their energy source [67].
In yeast, both glycolytic and respiratory activities are very low during the stationary phase, when trehalose has accumulated [68]. The glyoxylate shunt, or glyoxylate cycle, plays an essential role in trehalose synthesis in both stationary yeast cells and dauer larva of the C. elegans [69]. The glyoxylate shunt works by bypassing the steps in the citric acid cycle to produce trehalose using ethanol or acetate as its carbon source. Fatty acids, which are abundant in stationary yeast, could also be used as a carbon source of the glyoxylate cycle [69,70].
Trehalose often cooperates with other stress proteins to establish desiccation tolerance. In yeast, for example, trehalose works together with Hsp12p to promote both short-term and long-term desiccation tolerance [11]. It has also been shown that trehalose cooperates with Hsp104p to promote short-term desiccation tolerance while trehalose is responsible for long-term survival [45]. In tardigrade, while trehalose levels are relatively low, the effector still plays a crucial role in promoting desiccation tolerance by working synergistically with the tardigrade-specific disordered protein CAHS D [21].
Glycerol: Loss of water alters the osmolarity of cells and therefore induces osmotic stress. The high osmolarity glycerol (HOG) pathway is activated upon osmotic stress and increases the production of glycerol, which is the main osmolyte in yeast [71]. However, studies have shown that glycerol does not affect desiccation tolerance [22,72]. Our preliminary data showed that the addition of glycerol to culture medium prior to desiccation does enhance the desiccation tolerance (Zhang, unpublished data). More studies are needed in elucidating possible roles of glycerol in the desiccation stress response.
Proline: Proline is an amino acid that is unique among the standard amino acids in which it does not have a free α-amino group. In bacteria or plants, proline accumulates in response to osmotic stress and functions as an osmoprotectant [73]. In yeast, increasing proline level by either deleting the proline-oxidase (PUT1) or externally adding proline enhances both freezing and desiccation resistance [74]. However, in yeast, no proline increase was observed upon stress, unlike in bacteria or plants [73]. Like glycerol, the involvement of proline in desiccation stress warrants further investigations.

3. How do Anhydrobiotes Survive in Desiccated State

3.1. Minimal Metabolism but Not Ametabolism

One pressing question is: how do anhydrobiotes survive during desiccation stress and within the desiccated state? When transitioned from starvation to desiccation stage, yeast cells lose the two most important ingredients for life: food and water. To counter this problem, cells utilize two strategies –reduce their metabolic activities and use their own food “reservoirs”. When starved, yeast cells accumulate lipid droplets and trehalose to use as an energy reservoir [34]. When they are re-introduced to fresh nutrients, both lipids and trehalose are quickly consumed before cells use external nutrients for cellular growth [35,45]. If stress continues, or becomes more severe (starvation plus desiccation), cells may use this reserved energy to further prepare themselves for the anhydrobiotic stage.
The anhydrobiotic state is sometimes considered as the anhydrobiotic organisms being in a state of ametabolism or suspended metabolism due to desiccation [75]. In anhydrobiotic nematodes, metabolism cannot be detected using radiolabeled glucose [3]. However, molecular mobility and enzyme activities, although minimal, have been detected in desiccated lichens [76]. Enzyme activity was also observed in desiccated yeast for up to half a year [45]. Trehalose was slowly digested by trehalases while yeast was in its desiccated state. The consumption of trehalose likely provides energy to maintain life. However, knockout of trehalase genes (ATH1 and NTH1) extends the viability after desiccation [45]. It is possible that in the absence of trehalases, other forms of energy are used, while trehalose is used to preserve the protein and membrane structure. In our recent study, we observed that vacuoles, serving as the primary site for protein degradation and recycling, are mostly diminished 14 days after desiccation [12], suggesting that yeast cells likely use resources recycled from vacuoles to prepare/sustain them for the anhydrobiotic state. We also observed dynamic changes of lipid bodies. The circular membrane structure, induced by desiccation, is merged and releases the lipid into the lipid body (Figure 3); and the lipid body steadily decreases, likely consumed by cells as an energy source. Defects in lipid droplet synthesis significantly reduce desiccation tolerance, further suggesting that lipid consumption is important for survival of desiccation.
We compared the gene expression profiles between non-desiccated and 7-day desiccated stationary yeast cells. Among the up-regulated genes, the only enriched pathway was the fatty acid oxidation pathway, where six genes were identified (Table 2; Zhang, unpublished data). These data strongly suggest that fatty acid oxidation (β-oxidation) plays a significant role in the desiccation response.
β-oxidation of fatty acids provides not only necessary energy to cells, but also metabolic water. Oxidation of fat produces about 110 g of metabolic water per 100 g of fat, which is far more than oxidation of carbohydrates or proteins produces [77,78]. This metabolic water could potentially be crucial to the survival of the desiccated yeast and essential for enzymatic activities [45]. Similarly, metabolic water provides an important water source for animals living in desert landscapes or for migrating birds [79,80].

4. Desiccated Yeast as a Model to Study Prion and Other Neurodegenerative Disorders

Desiccation induces protein misfolding, which is a major cause of many neurodegenerative disorders [81]. This could make desiccated yeast good models to study neurodegenerative disorders, such as prion diseases.
Prion diseases are rare, yet fatal infections caused by the misfolding and aggregation of proteins, known as prions. These protein aggregates cluster within the body, specifically in the brain, and can cause degeneration and damage of brain tissue [82] often resulting in hinderance of thinking and reasoning. One of the most common prion diseases in humans is Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) [82]. CJD causes deterioration of brain tissue from the aggregation of prions, inhibiting the normal function of the brain. Currently, there is no known cause for CJD but there is speculation that the cause is wide ranging [83].
The budding yeast possesses several prion proteins. They are not homologous to mammal prions but share significant similarities of the amino acid composition and transmission of phenotype [14,84]. The most studied yeast prion is [PSI+], a misfolded aggregate of the Sup35 protein. Sup35 is a translation termination factor from the eRF3 family [85]. An easy way to identify [PSI+] formation is using an ADE2 mutant strain that contains a pre-mature stop codon. In the absence of [PSI+], i.e., [psi-], the colony of this strain becomes red in rich medium that lacks additional adenine. When the yeast cells contain [PSI+] positive proteins, the colonies become white due to the misfolded, non-functional Sup35 skipping the pre-mature stop codon, producing a full length of Ade2 protein [86]. Using this strategy, we isolated and examined the [PSI+] strain with and without desiccation stress using TEM. Our preliminary results showed that heavy [PSI+] aggregates were formed under desiccation, suggesting the feasibility of using desiccation stress to study prion biology.

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by the Institutional Development Awards (IDeA) from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under grant number P20GM121310.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dargaville, B.L.; Hutmacher, D.W. Water as the often neglected medium at the interface between materials and biology. Nat Commun 2022, 13, 4222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Cowan, N.B.; Agol, E.; Meadows, V.S.; Robinson, T.; Livengood, T.A.; Deming, D.; Lisse, C.M.; A’Hearn, M.F.; Wellnitz, D.D.; Seager, S.; et al. ALIEN MAPS OF AN OCEAN-BEARING WORLD. The Astrophysical Journal 2009, 700, 915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wharton, D.A. Anhydrobiosis. Curr Biol 2015, 25, R1114–R1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Goldstein, B.; Blaxter, M. Tardigrades. Curr Biol 2002, 12, R475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Smolikova, G.; Leonova, T.; Vashurina, N.; Frolov, A.; Medvedev, S. Desiccation Tolerance as the Basis of Long-Term Seed Viability. Int J Mol Sci 2020, 22, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hesgrove, C.; Boothby, T.C. The biology of tardigrade disordered proteins in extreme stress tolerance. Cell Communication and Signaling 2020, 18, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rapoport, A.; Turchetti, B.; Buzzini, P. Application of anhydrobiosis and dehydration of yeasts for non-conventional biotechnological goals. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 2016, 32, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Welch, A.Z.; Gibney, P.A.; Botstein, D.; Koshland, D.E. TOR and RAS pathways regulate desiccation tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 2013, 24, 115–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Gasch, A.P.; Spellman, P.T.; Kao, C.M.; Carmel-Harel, O.; Eisen, M.B.; Storz, G.; Botstein, D.; Brown, P.O. Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol Biol Cell 2000, 11, 4241–4257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Boothby, T.C.; Tapia, H.; Brozena, A.H.; Piszkiewicz, S.; Smith, A.E.; Giovannini, I.; Rebecchi, L.; Pielak, G.J.; Koshland, D.; Goldstein, B. Tardigrades Use Intrinsically Disordered Proteins to Survive Desiccation. Mol Cell 2017, 65, 975–984.e975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kim, S.X.; Çamdere, G.; Hu, X.; Koshland, D.; Tapia, H. Synergy between the small intrinsically disordered protein Hsp12 and trehalose sustain viability after severe desiccation. Elife 2018, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ren, Q.; Brenner, R.; Boothby, T.C.; Zhang, Z. Membrane and lipid metabolism plays an important role in desiccation resistance in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Microbiol 2020, 20, 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tebele, S.M.; Marks, R.A.; Farrant, J.M. Two Decades of Desiccation Biology: A Systematic Review of the Best Studied Angiosperm Resurrection Plants. Plants 2021, 10, 2784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Liebman, S.W.; Chernoff, Y.O. Prions in yeast. Genetics 2012, 191, 1041–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Collinson, L.P.; Dawes, I.W. Inducibility of the response of yeast cells to peroxide stress. J Gen Microbiol 1992, 138, 329–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hoekstra, F.A.; Golovina, E.A.; Buitink, J. Mechanisms of plant desiccation tolerance. Trends Plant Sci 2001, 6, 431–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ingram, J.; Bartels, D. THE MOLECULAR BASIS OF DEHYDRATION TOLERANCE IN PLANTS. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 1996, 47, 377–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Crowe, J.H.; Madin, K.A.C. Anhydrobiosis in nematodes: Evaporative water loss and survival. Journal of Experimental Zoology 1755, 193, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Erkut, C.; Penkov, S.; Khesbak, H.; Vorkel, D.; Verbavatz, J.-M.; Fahmy, K.; Kurzchalia, T.V. Trehalose Renders the Dauer Larva of Caenorhabditis elegans Resistant to Extreme Desiccation. Current Biology 2011, 21, 1331–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Boothby, T.C.; Tenlen, J.R.; Smith, F.W.; Wang, J.R.; Patanella, K.A.; Nishimura, E.O.; Tintori, S.C.; Li, Q.; Jones, C.D.; Yandell, M.; et al. Evidence for extensive horizontal gene transfer from the draft genome of a tardigrade. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015, 112, 15976–15981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nguyen, K.; Kc, S.; Gonzalez, T.; Tapia, H.; Boothby, T.C. Trehalose and tardigrade CAHS proteins work synergistically to promote desiccation tolerance. Commun Biol 2022, 5, 1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Calahan, D.; Dunham, M.; DeSevo, C.; Koshland, D.E. Genetic analysis of desiccation tolerance in Sachharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2011, 189, 507–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Huang, M.; Hull, C.M. Sporulation: how to survive on planet Earth (and beyond). Curr Genet 2017, 63, 831–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, G.R. Chromosome-condensed G1 phase yeast cells are tolerant to desiccation stress. Microb Cell 2022, 9, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bagniewska-Zadworna, A. The root microtubule cytoskeleton and cell cycle analysis through desiccation of Brassica napus seedlings. Protoplasma 2008, 233, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kakumanu, A.; Ambavaram, M.M.; Klumas, C.; Krishnan, A.; Batlang, U.; Myers, E.; Grene, R.; Pereira, A. Effects of drought on gene expression in maize reproductive and leaf meristem tissue revealed by RNA-Seq. Plant Physiol 2012, 160, 846–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Rippin, M.; Borchhardt, N.; Karsten, U.; Becker, B. Cold Acclimation Improves the Desiccation Stress Resilience of Polar Strains of Klebsormidium (Streptophyta). Front Microbiol 2019, 10, 1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Slade, D.; Radman, M. Oxidative stress resistance in Deinococcus radiodurans. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2011, 75, 133–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lew, D.J.W.T.; Pringle, J.R. Cell cycle control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In The Molecular and Cellular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces: Cell Cycle and Cell Biology; Pringle, J.R.B.J.R., Jones, E.W., Eds.; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1997; pp. 607–695. [Google Scholar]
  30. Yang, H.; Ren, Q.; Zhang, Z. Cleavage of Mcd1 by caspase-like protease Esp1 promotes apoptosis in budding yeast. Mol Biol Cell 2008, 19, 2127–2134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rajvanshi, P.K.; Arya, M.; Rajasekharan, R. The stress-regulatory transcription factors Msn2 and Msn4 regulate fatty acid oxidation in budding yeast. J Biol Chem 2017, 292, 18628–18643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Werner-Washburne, M.; Braun, E.; Johnston, G.C.; Singer, R.A. Stationary phase in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Rev 1993, 57, 383–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. de Nobel, H.; Ruiz, C.; Martin, H.; Morris, W.; Brul, S.; Molina, M.; Klis, F.M. Cell wall perturbation in yeast results in dual phosphorylation of the Slt2/Mpk1 MAP kinase and in an Slt2-mediated increase in FKS2-lacZ expression, glucanase resistance and thermotolerance. Microbiology (Reading) 2000, 146 Pt 9, 2121–2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wolinski, H.; Kolb, D.; Hermann, S.; Koning, R.I.; Kohlwein, S.D. A role for seipin in lipid droplet dynamics and inheritance in yeast. J Cell Sci 2011, 124 Pt 22, 3894–3904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kurat, C.F.; Natter, K.; Petschnigg, J.; Wolinski, H.; Scheuringer, K.; Scholz, H.; Zimmermann, R.; Leber, R.; Zechner, R.; Kohlwein, S.D. Obese yeast: triglyceride lipolysis is functionally conserved from mammals to yeast. J Biol Chem 2006, 281, 491–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Beker, M.J.; Rapoport, A.I. Conservation of yeasts by dehydration. In Biotechnology Methods; Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 1987; pp. 127–171. [Google Scholar]
  37. Rapoport, A. Anhydrobiosis and Dehydration of Yeasts. In Biotechnology of Yeasts and Filamentous Fungi; Sibirny, A.A., Ed.; Springer International Publishing, 2017; pp. 87–116. [Google Scholar]
  38. Rapoport, A.; Golovina, E.A.; Gervais, P.; Dupont, S.; Beney, L. Anhydrobiosis: Inside yeast cells. Biotechnol Adv 2019, 37, 51–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pereira Ede, J.; Panek, A.D.; Eleutherio, E.C. Protection against oxidation during dehydration of yeast. Cell Stress Chaperones 2003, 8, 120–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Hagymasi, A.T.; Dempsey, J.P.; Srivastava, P.K. Heat-Shock Proteins. Curr Protoc 2022, 2, e592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Schlesinger, M.J. Heat shock proteins. J Biol Chem 1990, 265, 12111–12114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. De Maio, A. Heat shock proteins: facts, thoughts, and dreams. Shock 1999, 11, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hu, C.; Yang, J.; Qi, Z.; Wu, H.; Wang, B.; Zou, F.; Mei, H.; Liu, J.; Wang, W.; Liu, Q. Heat shock proteins: Biological functions, pathological roles, and therapeutic opportunities. MedComm (2020) 2022, 3, e161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sales, K.; Brandt, W.; Rumbak, E.; Lindsey, G. The LEA-like protein HSP 12 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae has a plasma membrane location and protects membranes against desiccation and ethanol-induced stress. Biochim Biophys Acta 2000, 1463, 267–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Tapia, H.; Young, L.; Fox, D.; Bertozzi, C.R.; Koshland, D. Increasing intracellular trehalose is sufficient to confer desiccation tolerance to Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015, 112, 6122–6127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Guzhova, I.; Krallish, I.; Khroustalyova, G.; Margulis, B.; Rapoport, A. Dehydration of yeast: Changes in the intracellular content of Hsp70 family proteins. Process Biochemistry 2008, 43, 1138–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Iryani, M.T.M.; Sorgeloos, P.; Danish-Daniel, M.; Tan, M.P.; Wong, L.L.; Mok, W.J.; Satyantini, W.H.; Mahasri, G.; Sung, Y.Y. Cyst viability and stress tolerance upon heat shock protein 70 knockdown in the brine shrimp Artemia franciscana. Cell Stress Chaperones 2020, 25, 1099–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Trivedi, R.; Nagarajaram, H.A. Intrinsically Disordered Proteins: An Overview. Int J Mol Sci 2022, 23, 14050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chakrabortee, S.; Tripathi, R.; Watson, M.; Schierle, G.S.; Kurniawan, D.P.; Kaminski, C.F.; Wise, M.J.; Tunnacliffe, A. Intrinsically disordered proteins as molecular shields. Mol Biosyst 2012, 8, 210–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hincha, D.K.; Thalhammer, A. LEA proteins: IDPs with versatile functions in cellular dehydration tolerance. Biochem Soc Trans 2012, 40, 1000–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Garay-Arroyo, A.; Colmenero-Flores, J.M.; Garciarrubio, A.; Covarrubias, A.A. Highly hydrophilic proteins in prokaryotes and eukaryotes are common during conditions of water deficit. J Biol Chem 2000, 275, 5668–5674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Rodríguez-Porrata, B.; Carmona-Gutierrez, D.; Reisenbichler, A.; Bauer, M.; Lopez, G.; Escoté, X.; Mas, A.; Madeo, F.; Cordero-Otero, R. Sip18 hydrophilin prevents yeast cell death during desiccation stress. J Appl Microbiol 2012, 112, 512–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. López-Martínez, G.; Rodríguez-Porrata, B.; Margalef-Català, M.; Cordero-Otero, R. The STF2p hydrophilin from Saccharomyces cerevisiae is required for dehydration stress tolerance. PLoS One 2012, 7, e33324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Dauss, E.; Papoušková, K.; Sychrová, H.; Rapoport, A. Anhydrobiosis in yeast: role of cortical endoplasmic reticulum protein Ist2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells during dehydration and subsequent rehydration. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2021, 114, 1069–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Ando, A.; Tanaka, F.; Murata, Y.; Takagi, H.; Shima, J. Identification and classification of genes required for tolerance to high-sucrose stress revealed by genome-wide screening of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 2006, 6, 249–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Miralles, V.J.; Serrano, R. A genomic locus in Saccharomyces cerevisiae with four genes up-regulated by osmotic stress. Mol Microbiol 1995, 17, 653–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Dang, N.X.; Hincha, D.K. Identification of two hydrophilins that contribute to the desiccation and freezing tolerance of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) cells. Cryobiology 2011, 62, 188–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Jain, S.; Wheeler, J.R.; Walters, R.W.; Agrawal, A.; Barsic, A.; Parker, R. ATPase-Modulated Stress Granules Contain a Diverse Proteome and Substructure. Cell 2016, 164, 487–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Venancio, T.M.; Aravind, L. CYSTM, a novel cysteine-rich transmembrane module with a role in stress tolerance across eukaryotes. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 149–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Garay-Arroyo, A.; Covarrubias, A.A. Three genes whose expression is induced by stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 1999, 15, 879–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Szoradi, T.; Schaeff, K.; Garcia-Rivera, E.M.; Itzhak, D.N.; Schmidt, R.M.; Bircham, P.W.; Leiss, K.; Diaz-Miyar, J.; Chen, V.K.; Muzzey, D.; et al. SHRED Is a Regulatory Cascade that Reprograms Ubr1 Substrate Specificity for Enhanced Protein Quality Control during Stress. Mol Cell 2018, 70, 1025–1037.e1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tkach, J.M.; Yimit, A.; Lee, A.Y.; Riffle, M.; Costanzo, M.; Jaschob, D.; Hendry, J.A.; Ou, J.; Moffat, J.; Boone, C.; et al. Dissecting DNA damage response pathways by analysing protein localization and abundance changes during DNA replication stress. Nat Cell Biol 2012, 14, 966–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Planta, R.J.; Mager, W.H. The list of cytoplasmic ribosomal proteins of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 1998, 14, 471–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Jain, N.K.; Roy, I. Effect of trehalose on protein structure. Protein Sci 2009, 18, 24–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Malferrari, M.; Nalepa, A.; Venturoli, G.; Francia, F.; Lubitz, W.; Möbius, K.; Savitsky, A. Structural and dynamical characteristics of trehalose and sucrose matrices at different hydration levels as probed by FTIR and high-field EPR. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2014, 16, 9831–9848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Crowe, J.H. Trehalose as a “chemical chaperone”: fact and fantasy. Adv Exp Med Biol 2007, 594, 143–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Dickinson, J.R.; Schweizer, M. Metabolism and Molecular Physiology of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae; CRC Press, 2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. François, J.; Parrou, J.L. Reserve carbohydrates metabolism in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2001, 25, 125–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Erkut, C.; Gade, V.R.; Laxman, S.; Kurzchalia, T.V. The glyoxylate shunt is essential for desiccation tolerance in C. elegans and budding yeast. Elife 2016, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ahn, S.; Jung, J.; Jang, I.A.; Madsen, E.L.; Park, W. Role of Glyoxylate Shunt in Oxidative Stress Response. J Biol Chem 2016, 291, 11928–11938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. de Nadal, E.; Posas, F. The HOG pathway and the regulation of osmoadaptive responses in yeast. FEMS Yeast Res 2022, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Semkiv, M.; Ternavska, O.T.; Dmytruk, K.V.; Sybirny, A.A. Effect of Trehalose and Glycerol on the Resistance of Recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains to Desiccation, Freeze-Thaw and Osmotic Stresses. Sci. Innov. 2018, 14, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Takagi, H. Proline as a stress protectant in yeast: physiological functions, metabolic regulations, and biotechnological applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2008, 81, 211–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Takagi, H.; Sakai, K.; Morida, K.; Nakamori, S. Proline accumulation by mutation or disruption of the proline oxidase gene improves resistance to freezing and desiccation stresses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2000, 184, 103–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Grzyb, T.; Skłodowska, A. Introduction to Bacterial Anhydrobiosis: A General Perspective and the Mechanisms of Desiccation-Associated Damage. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Candotto Carniel, F.; Fernandez-Marín, B.; Arc, E.; Craighero, T.; Laza, J.M.; Incerti, G.; Tretiach, M.; Kranner, I. How dry is dry? Molecular mobility in relation to thallus water content in a lichen. J Exp Bot 2021, 72, 1576–1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Mellanby, K. Metabolic Water and Desiccation. Nature 1942, 150, 21–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Schmidt-Nielsen, K. Animal Physiology: Adaptation and Environment; Cambridge University Press, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  79. Klaassen, M. Metabolic constraints on long-distance migration in birds. J Exp Biol 1996, 199 Pt 1, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Takei, Y. Metabolic Water As a Route for Water Acquisition in Vertebrates Inhabiting Dehydrating Environments. Zoolog Sci 2024, 41, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ross, C.A.; Poirier, M.A. Protein aggregation and neurodegenerative disease. Nat Med 2004, 10 Suppl, S10–S17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Soto, C.; Satani, N. The intricate mechanisms of neurodegeneration in prion diseases. Trends Mol Med 2011, 17, 14–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Rossi, M.; Baiardi, S.; Parchi, P. Understanding Prion Strains: Evidence from Studies of the Disease Forms Affecting Humans. Viruses 2019, 11, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Wickner, R.B. [URE3] as an altered URE2 protein: evidence for a prion analog in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 1994, 264, 566–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Kushnirov, V.V.; Kochneva-Pervukhova, N.V.; Chechenova, M.B.; Frolova, N.S.; Ter-Avanesyan, M.D. Prion properties of the Sup35 protein of yeast Pichia methanolica. Embo J 2000, 19, 324–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Derkatch, I.L.; Chernoff, Y.O.; Kushnirov, V.V.; Inge-Vechtomov, S.G.; Liebman, S.W. Genesis and variability of [PSI] prion factors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 1996, 144, 1375–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Cell cycle and desiccation tolerance in S. cerevisiae. Red: DRAQ5 staining of nuclei. Blue: Fluorescence brightener 28 staining of cell wall and bud scars, which indicate the replicative age of yeast cells. The desiccation resistant cells (Dr) are in G1 but have higher fluorescence intensity (Redraw based on [24]).
Figure 1. Cell cycle and desiccation tolerance in S. cerevisiae. Red: DRAQ5 staining of nuclei. Blue: Fluorescence brightener 28 staining of cell wall and bud scars, which indicate the replicative age of yeast cells. The desiccation resistant cells (Dr) are in G1 but have higher fluorescence intensity (Redraw based on [24]).
Preprints 110094 g001
Figure 2. TEM image of a stationary yeast cell desiccated for 14 days, showing a whorl-like structure (boxed and inset) caused by ER stress (Adopted from reference [12]).
Figure 2. TEM image of a stationary yeast cell desiccated for 14 days, showing a whorl-like structure (boxed and inset) caused by ER stress (Adopted from reference [12]).
Preprints 110094 g002
Figure 3. TEM image of a stationary yeast cell desiccated for 14 days, showing the lipid droplet surrounded by circular ER structures. Some of the circular structure appears to have no membrane (arrow in enlarged box area) (Adopted from reference [12]).
Figure 3. TEM image of a stationary yeast cell desiccated for 14 days, showing the lipid droplet surrounded by circular ER structures. Some of the circular structure appears to have no membrane (arrow in enlarged box area) (Adopted from reference [12]).
Preprints 110094 g003
Table 2. Desiccation-induced upregulated genes enriched in the fatty acid oxidation pathway in budding yeast.
Table 2. Desiccation-induced upregulated genes enriched in the fatty acid oxidation pathway in budding yeast.
Gene ID Gene Name Description
YER015W LPX1 Peroxisomal matrix-localized lipase; required for normal peroxisomal morphology.
YGL205W POX1 Fatty-acyl coenzyme A oxidase; involved in the fatty acid beta-oxidation pathway.
YIL160C POT1 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase with broad chain length specificity; cleaves 3-ketoacyl-CoA into acyl-CoA and acetyl-CoA during beta-oxidation of fatty acids.
YKR009C FOX2 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase and enoyl-CoA hydratase; multifunctional enzyme of the peroxisomal fatty acid beta-oxidation pathway.
YLR284C ECI1 Peroxisomal delta3, delta2-enoyl-CoA isomerase; essential for the beta-oxidation of unsaturated fatty acids.
YOR180C DCI1 Peroxisomal protein involved in fatty acid metabolism.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.

Downloads

123

Views

57

Comments

0

Subscription

Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.

Email

Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated