Submitted:
11 June 2024
Posted:
11 June 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental materials
2.2. Experimental factors
2.3. Design of cutting experimental device
2.4. Cutting experiment method
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Analysis of the cutting process of stalk nodes and internodes
3.2. Single-factor experimental analysis
3.2.1. Analysis of moisture content experiment
3.2.2. Analysis of cutting height experiment
3.2.3. Analysis of blade clearance experiment
3.2.4. Analysis of OCA experiment
3.2.5. Analysis of SKCA experiment
3.2.6. Analysis of SCA experiment
4. Response surface experiment
4.1. Experimental design
4.2. Results and discussion of RSM experimental
4.2.1. Analysis of the USS
4.2.2. Analysis of the results of the UCEC
4.3. Parameter optimization and discussion
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zhao, J.; Xia, B.; Meng, Y.; Yang, Z.; Pan, L.; Zhou, M. Transcriptome Analysis to Shed Light on the Molecular Mechanisms of Early Responses to Cadmium in Roots and Leaves of KG (Pennisetum americanum × P. purpureum). International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 20(10) (2019) 2532. [CrossRef]
- Li, M.; Zi, X.; Tang, J.; Zhou, H.; Cai, Y. Silage fermentation, chemical composition and ruminal degradation of KG, cassava foliage and their mixture. Grassland Science, 65(4) (2019) 210-215. [CrossRef]
- Huan, X.; Wang, D.; You, Y.; Ma, W.; Zhu, L.; Li, S. Establishment and calibration of discrete element model of KG stalk based on throwing test. INMATEH-Agricultural Engineering. 66 (01) (2022) 19-30. [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.Q.; Cui, Q.L.; Guo, Y.M.; Li, H.B. Experiment and Analysis of Cutting Mechanical Properties of Millet Stem. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery. 2019, 50 (04): 146-155+162. [CrossRef]
- Dong, R. Simulation and Experimental Study on Cutting Process of Silage Corn Harvesting Header. Master’s Thesis, Jilin University, Changchun, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Z.G.; Qu, G. Shearing Characteristics of Corn Stalk Pith for Separation. Bioresources, 2017,12(2)2296-2309.
- Igathinathane, C.; Womac, A.R.; Sokhansanj, S. Corn stalk orientation effect on mechanical cutting. Biosystems Engineering, 2010, 107(2):97-106. [CrossRef]
- Xia, Y.D.; Klinger, J.; Bhattacharjee, T.; Thompson, V. The elastoplastic flexural behaviour of corn stalks. Biosystems Engineering, 2022, 216: 218-228. [CrossRef]
- Jin, W.; Ding, Y.C.; Bai, S.H.; Zhang, X.J.; Yan, J.S.; Zhou, X.C. Design and experiments of the reel board header device for an oil sunflower harvester. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2021, 37(3): 27-36. [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Huang, X.M.; Ma, L.; Zong, W.Y.; Zhan, G.C.; Lin, Z.X. Design and Test of Static Sliding Cut Angle Constant Cutting Machine for Chain Oil Sunflower Harvester Header. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery. 2021, 52 (01): 99-108. [CrossRef]
- Song, Z.H.; Song, H.L.; Geng, A.J.; Li, Y.D.; Yan, Y.F.; Li, F.D. Experiment on cutting characteristics of cotton stalk with double supports. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31(16): 37-45. [CrossRef]
- Huang, M.S.; Li, Y.M.; Chen, A.Y.; Xu, L.Z. Design and Test of Double-cutterbar structure on wide header for main crop rice harvesting. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(13): 4432. [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhao, H.M.; Liu, B.; Ma, J.T.; He, Y.; Zhang, Y.T.; Xu, H.B. Effects of cutting parameters on cutting of citrus fruit stems. Biosystems Engineering, 2020, (193): 1-11.
- Luo, H.F.; Guo, S.J.; Zhi, Z.K.; Kan, J.M. Sliding Cutting and Cutting Parameters of Concentric Curvilineal Edge Sliding Cutter for Caragana korshinskii (CK) Branches. FORESTS. 2023, 14(12), 2379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liao, Y.Y.; Liao, Q.X.; Tian, B.P.; Shu, C.X.; Wang, J.; Ma, A.L. Experimental research on the mechanical physical parameters of bottom stalk of the A rundo donax L. in harvesting period. Transactions of the CSAE, 2007, 23(4), 124-129.
- Kovacs, A.; Kerenyi, G. Physical characteristics and mechanical behaviour of maize stalks for machine development. International Agrophysics, 2019, 33(4). 427-436. [CrossRef]
- Shi, Y.Y.; Chen, M.; Wang, X.C.; Zhang, Y.N.; Odhiambo, M.O. Experiment and analysis on mechanical properties of artemisia selengensis stalk[J]. International journal of agricultural and biological engineering, 2017, 10(2), 16-25. [CrossRef]
- Ye, B.N. Experimental Study on Key Technologies and Devices for Harvesting KG. Ph.D. Thesis, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Hou, G.Y.; Li, M.; Zi, X.J.; Zhou, H.L.; Liu, G.D. Correlations of Physical Properties and Feeding Value of KG Stem. Acta Ecologiae Animalis Domastici. 2016,37(11):68-73.
- Wang, S.; Du, J.H.; Zhao, L.; Jiao, J.; Li, Z.X.; Xue, Z. Tensile and Shearing Strength Properties of the Stems of KG (Pennisetum sinese Roxb). Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops. 2019,40(06):1188-1194. [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Du, J.H.; Zhao, L.; Li, Z.X.; Jiao, J.; Xue, Z.; Sun, Q.F. Strength characteristics of bending and compression of KG stem. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences. 2019,47(22):264-268. [CrossRef]
- Rong, X. Optimization of cutting process for KG stalk with rolling cutter. Master’ Thesis, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Y.; Zhou, H.L.; Liu, G.D.; Wang, J. Effect of Moisture Content on the Quality of KG Silage at Different Growing Stages. Journal of Domestic Animal Ecology. 2013,34(07):39-43.
- Zhao, X.L. Design and Research for the Stalk Chopping and Recovery Device of Corn Combine Reaping Both Stalk and Spike. master’ Thesis, China Academy of Agricultural Mechanization Sciences, Beijing, 2014.
- Bie, Z.J. Finite Element Simulation Analysis of the Cutting Process of Chaff Cutter and Experimental Study on the Performance of the Cutter. master’ Thesis, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot,2019. [CrossRef]
- Ma, Y.D. Devices and Key Technologies for Whole Hydroponic Lettuce Harvesting with Low Damage. Ph.D. Thesis, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.M. Experimental Study on the Factors Influencing the Cutting Performance of Sunflower Stalk. Master’ Thesis, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.M.; Qin, T.D.; Chen, J.; Zhao, Z. Experimental study and analysis on mechanical property of corn stalk reciprocating cutting. Transactions of the CSAE, 2011, 27(1): 160-164. [CrossRef]
- Jiang, T.; Hou, J.L.; Li, T.H.; Shao, Y.Y.; Wang, Z.; Liu, L. Field Reciprocating Cutting Test Bench for Cron Stalks. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery. 2013,44(S2):32-36. [CrossRef]
- Yang, Z. Experimental Study on the Cutting Performance of Sunflower Stalk. Master’ Thesis, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, L.Y. An approach to the sliding cutting angle of the working parts of agricultural machinery. Acta Agricultural Universitatis Jiangxiensis. 1991, 13(1). [CrossRef]
- Xiang, J.W.; Yang, L.F.; Li, S.P. Experimental investigation of the basecutter for minitype sugarcane harvester. Transactions of the CSAE 2007, 23, 158–163. [Google Scholar]
- Gu, X.W. Design and Experiment Study on the Test Bench for Cutting King Grass. Master’ Thesis, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Xie, L.X.; Wang, J.; Cheng, S.M. Zeng, B.S.; Yang, Z.Z. Optimisation and finite element simulation of the chopping process for chopper sugarcane harvesting. Biosystems Engineering, 2018, 175: 16-26. [CrossRef]
- Xue, Z.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.L.; Li, C.B.; Chen, S. Test and analysis on the mechanical properties of cassava stalks. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 2015, 25, 59–67. [Google Scholar]
- Jin, W.; Ding, Y.C.; Bai, S.H. , et al. Design and experiments of the reel board header device for an oil sunflower harvester. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2021, 37(3): 27-36. [CrossRef]
- He, Z.T.; Ding, H.L.; Li, J.; Zhang, Y.Z. Review of Researches on Stalk Cutting. Machinery Design & Manufacture. 2023(08):277-284. [CrossRef]
- Awan, M.R.; Rojas, H.A.G.; Benavidas, J.I.P.; Hameed, S.; Hussain, A.; Egea, A.J.S. Specific energy modeling of abrasive cut off operation based on sliding, plowing and cutting[J].Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2022. [CrossRef]
- Xie, L.X.; Wang, J.; Cheng, S.M.; Zeng, B.S. Yang, Z.Z. Optimization and dynamic simulation of a conveying and top breaking system for whole-stalk sugarcane harvesters. Biosystems Engineering. 197 (2020) 156-169. [CrossRef]
- Feng, X.; Gong, Z.; Wang, L.; Yu, Y.T.; Liu, T.H.; Song, L.L. Behavior of maize particle penetrating a sieve hole based on the particle centroid in an air-screen cleaning unit. Powder Technology. 2021(385) 501-516. [CrossRef]
- Galedar, M.N.; Jafari, A. Mohtasebia, S. S.; Tabatabaeefar, A.; Sharifi, A.; O'Dogherty, M. J.; Rafiee, S.; Richard, G. Effects of moisture content and level in the crop on the engineering properties of alfalfa stems. Biosystems Engineering.2008, 101(2): 199-208. [CrossRef]



















| Code | Factor | ||
| OCA (°) |
Blade clearance (mm) |
SCA (°) |
|
| -1 | 10 | 2 | 20 |
| 0 | 25 | 3 | 30 |
| 1 | 40 | 4 | 40 |
| Test number | Factor level | Results of indicators | |||
| OCA (°) |
Blade clearance (mm) | SCA (°) |
USS (MPa) |
UCEC (mJ/mm2) |
|
| 1 | 10 | 2 | 30 | 0.96 | 10.42 |
| 2 | 40 | 2 | 30 | 1.81 | 3.86 |
| 3 | 10 | 4 | 30 | 0.97 | 3.61 |
| 4 | 40 | 4 | 30 | 0.99 | 13.19 |
| 5 | 10 | 3 | 20 | 1.02 | 10.42 |
| 6 | 40 | 3 | 20 | 1.60 | 4.72 |
| 7 | 10 | 3 | 40 | 1.13 | 3.54 |
| 8 | 40 | 3 | 40 | 1.63 | 9.09 |
| 9 | 25 | 2 | 20 | 1.15 | 17.15 |
| 10 | 25 | 4 | 20 | 0.80 | 15.83 |
| 11 | 25 | 2 | 40 | 1.85 | 9.17 |
| 12 | 25 | 4 | 40 | 1.13 | 17.29 |
| 13 | 25 | 3 | 30 | 0.43 | 3.54 |
| 14 | 25 | 3 | 30 | 0.33 | 6.46 |
| 15 | 25 | 3 | 30 | 0.47 | 3.61 |
| 16 | 25 | 3 | 30 | 0.60 | 3.47 |
| 17 | 25 | 3 | 30 | 0.34 | 4.93 |
| Variance source | Sum of squares | Freedom | Mean Square | F value | Significant level P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 3.72 | 9 | 0.4134 | 17.92 | 0.0005** |
| 0.4753 | 1 | 0.4753 | 20.60 | 0.0027** | |
| 0.4418 | 1 | 0.4418 | 19.15 | 0.0033** | |
| 0.1711 | 1 | 0.1711 | 7.42 | 0.0296* | |
| 0.1722 | 1 | 0.1722 | 7.47 | 0.0292* | |
| 0.0016 | 1 | 0.0016 | 0.0694 | 0.7999 | |
| 0.0342 | 1 | 0.0342 | 1.48 | 0.2627 | |
| 0.7803 | 1 | 0.7803 | 33.82 | 0.0007** | |
| 0.4258 | 1 | 0.4258 | 18.46 | 0.0036** | |
| 0.9721 | 1 | 0.9721 | 42.14 | 0.0003** | |
| Residual | 0.1615 | 7 | 0.0231 | ||
| Lack of Fit | 0.1130 | 3 | 0.0377 | 3.10 | 0.1512 |
| Pure Error | 0.0485 | 4 | 0.0121 | ||
| Cor Total | 3.88 | 16 | |||
| R-Squared | 0.9584 | C.V.% | 0.368 | ||
| Adj R-Squared | 0.9049 | Adeq Precision | 12.3160 | ||
| Variance source | Sum of squares | Freedom | Mean Square | F value | Significant level P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 397.69 | 9 | 44.19 | 25.13 | 0.0002** |
| 1.03 | 1 | 1.03 | 0.5855 | 0.4692 | |
| 10.86 | 1 | 10.86 | 6.17 | 0.0419* | |
| 10.19 | 1 | 10.19 | 5.80 | 0.0469* | |
| 65.12 | 1 | 65.12 | 37.04 | 0.0005** | |
| 31.64 | 1 | 31.64 | 17.99 | 0.0038** | |
| 22.28 | 1 | 22.28 | 12.67 | 0.0092** | |
| 21.79 | 1 | 21.79 | 12.39 | 0.0097** | |
| 134.07 | 1 | 134.07 | 76.24 | < 0.0001** | |
| 97.63 | 1 | 97.63 | 55.52 | 0.0001** | |
| Residual | 12.31 | 7 | 1.76 | ||
| Lack of Fit | 5.56 | 3 | 1.85 | 1.10 | 0.4472 |
| Pure Error | 6.75 | 4 | 1.69 | ||
| Cor Total | 410.00 | 16 | |||
| R-Squared | 0.9700 | C.V.% | 16.07 | ||
| Adj R-Squared | 0.9314 | Adeq Precision | 14.3689 | ||
| Indicators | Predicted value | Actual experimental value | Relative error (%) |
Average relative error (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| USS (MPa) | 0.42 | 0.45 | 7.14 | 6.34 |
| 0.44 | 4.76 | |||
| 0.39 | 7.14 | |||
| UCEC (mJ/mm2) | 3.47 | 3.62 | 4.32 | 4.71 |
| 3.79 | 9.22 | |||
| 3.45 | 0.58 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).