Figure 1.
Structural model of filtration module with cross-section showing external pressure support tubing and internal shaft in which bacterial cellulose membrane is packed.
Figure 1.
Structural model of filtration module with cross-section showing external pressure support tubing and internal shaft in which bacterial cellulose membrane is packed.
Figure 2.
Flow volume through module with area of 19.24 cm2 as function of time for pressures of 1, 2, and 3 bar.
Figure 2.
Flow volume through module with area of 19.24 cm2 as function of time for pressures of 1, 2, and 3 bar.
Figure 3.
Total flow volumes through module with area of 19.24 cm2 in 60 minutes.
Figure 3.
Total flow volumes through module with area of 19.24 cm2 in 60 minutes.
Figure 4.
Response surface of flow volume through filtration module with area of 19.24 cm2 as function of time and pressure.
Figure 4.
Response surface of flow volume through filtration module with area of 19.24 cm2 as function of time and pressure.
Figure 5.
Flow volume through module with area of 76.97 cm2 as function of time at pressures of 1, 2, and 3 bar.
Figure 5.
Flow volume through module with area of 76.97 cm2 as function of time at pressures of 1, 2, and 3 bar.
Figure 6.
Total flow volume through module with area of 76.97 cm2 in 60 minutes at pressure of 1, 2, and 3 bar.
Figure 6.
Total flow volume through module with area of 76.97 cm2 in 60 minutes at pressure of 1, 2, and 3 bar.
Figure 7.
Comparison of flow volumes at different pressures for the filtration module areas of 19.24 cm2 (left) and 76.97 cm2 (right).
Figure 7.
Comparison of flow volumes at different pressures for the filtration module areas of 19.24 cm2 (left) and 76.97 cm2 (right).
Figure 8.
Response surface of flow volume through module with area of 76.97 cm2 as function of time and pressure.
Figure 8.
Response surface of flow volume through module with area of 76.97 cm2 as function of time and pressure.
Figure 9.
Response surface of flow volume as function of time and area.
Figure 9.
Response surface of flow volume as function of time and area.
Figure 10.
Infrared spectrum of bacterial cellulose membrane after filtration.
Figure 10.
Infrared spectrum of bacterial cellulose membrane after filtration.
Figure 11.
Results of thermogravimetric analysis of BC samples before and after filtration of wastewater contaminated with oil.
Figure 11.
Results of thermogravimetric analysis of BC samples before and after filtration of wastewater contaminated with oil.
Figure 12.
Diffractogram of bacterial cellulose after filtration.
Figure 12.
Diffractogram of bacterial cellulose after filtration.
Figure 13.
Bacterial cellulose membrane used in filtration tests with nomenclature of “A”, “B”, to “C” to right of pores analysed.
Figure 13.
Bacterial cellulose membrane used in filtration tests with nomenclature of “A”, “B”, to “C” to right of pores analysed.
Figure 14.
Optical microscopy of pore A of BC membrane used for filtration (magnification left to right: 4x, 10x, 40x, and 100x).
Figure 14.
Optical microscopy of pore A of BC membrane used for filtration (magnification left to right: 4x, 10x, 40x, and 100x).
Figure 15.
Optical microscopy of pore B of BC membrane used for filtration (magnification left to right: 4x, 10x, 40x, and 100x).
Figure 15.
Optical microscopy of pore B of BC membrane used for filtration (magnification left to right: 4x, 10x, 40x, and 100x).
Figure 16.
Optical microscopy of pore C of BC membrane used for filtration (magnification left to right: 4x, 10x, 40x, and 100x).
Figure 16.
Optical microscopy of pore C of BC membrane used for filtration (magnification left to right: 4x, 10x, 40x, and 100x).
Figure 17.
Microphotographs of bacterial cellulose membrane before filtration process (magnification: 100, 500, 1000, 3000, and 10000 times).
Figure 17.
Microphotographs of bacterial cellulose membrane before filtration process (magnification: 100, 500, 1000, 3000, and 10000 times).
Figure 18.
Microphotographs of bacterial cellulose membrane after filtration process (magnification: 200, 1000, and 5000 times).
Figure 18.
Microphotographs of bacterial cellulose membrane after filtration process (magnification: 200, 1000, and 5000 times).
Figure 19.
Results of mechanical tests: Tensile strength (MPa) and elongation at break (%).
Figure 19.
Results of mechanical tests: Tensile strength (MPa) and elongation at break (%).
Figure 20.
Effluent (left to right) after treatment station, BC filtration system and activated charcoal filtering.
Figure 20.
Effluent (left to right) after treatment station, BC filtration system and activated charcoal filtering.
Figure 21.
Synthetic oily effluent before and after filtration with the BC membrane.
Figure 21.
Synthetic oily effluent before and after filtration with the BC membrane.
Table 1.
Yield and water retention capacity of bacterial cellulose membrane.
Table 1.
Yield and water retention capacity of bacterial cellulose membrane.
| Average weight (g/L) |
WRC (%) |
| Wet |
416.91 ± 16.32 |
97.58 ± 0.33 |
| Dry |
10.05 ± 1.46 |
Table 2.
Chemical groups in bacterial cellulose membrane.
Table 2.
Chemical groups in bacterial cellulose membrane.
| Wavenumber (cm-1) |
WRC (%) |
| 3344 |
Axial deformation of OH |
| 2922 |
Asymmetrical axial deformation of CH2 |
| 2854 |
Asymmetrical axial deformation of CH2 |
| 1745 |
Axial deformation of C=O |
| 1649 |
Angular deformation of C-O-H |
| 1543 |
Axial deformation of C=C |
| 1425 |
Angular deformation of CH2 |
| 1314 |
Angular deformation of CH |
| 1206 |
Angular deformation of CH |
| 1159 - 1002 |
Axial deformation of C-O |
Table 3.
Identification of crystalline phases of sample.
Table 3.
Identification of crystalline phases of sample.
| Sample |
Colour |
Reference code |
Chemical formula |
Name of compound |
| AFK239735 |
----- |
46-1607 |
C4H2O3/(CHCO)2O |
Maleic anhydride |
| ----- |
50-2241 |
(C6H10O5)n
|
Cellulose |
Table 4.
EDS results of bacterial cellulose membrane prior to filtration process.
Table 4.
EDS results of bacterial cellulose membrane prior to filtration process.
| lement |
Mass of Elements |
| A |
B |
C |
| C |
53.59 |
66.42 |
51.73 |
| O |
45.72 |
32.34 |
45.91 |
| P |
0.69 |
1.24 |
2.36 |
Table 5.
EDS results of bacterial cellulose membrane filtration process.
Table 5.
EDS results of bacterial cellulose membrane filtration process.
| Element |
Mass (%) |
| A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
| C |
55.00 |
55.35 |
55.93 |
57.75 |
55.95 |
53.17 |
| O |
32.63 |
38.21 |
35.24 |
36.58 |
37.70 |
39.88 |
| Na |
5.02 |
2.99 |
3.77 |
2.28 |
2.78 |
3.13 |
| Mg |
0.87 |
0.30 |
0.88 |
0.43 |
0.30 |
- |
| Si |
0.97 |
0.33 |
0.56 |
- |
- |
- |
| Cl |
5.30 |
2.29 |
2.79 |
2.96 |
3.27 |
3.17 |
| P |
0.21 |
0.16 |
0.27 |
- |
- |
- |
| Ca |
- |
0.37 |
0.58 |
- |
- |
0.65 |
Table 6.
Physicochemical properties of effluent after treatment station, activated charcoal filtering and bacterial cellulose filtration system.
Table 6.
Physicochemical properties of effluent after treatment station, activated charcoal filtering and bacterial cellulose filtration system.
| Variable |
After effluent treatment station |
After activated charcoal filtering |
After BC filtration system |
| pH |
6.0 |
6.0 |
5.5 |
| Dissolved oxygen |
2.3 mg/L |
2.7 mg/L |
0.5 mg/L |
| Total oils and greases |
17.1 mg/L |
<10.0 mg/L |
<10.0 mg/L |
| Turbidity |
5.2 NTU |
26.3 NTU |
5.64 NTU |
| Apparent colour |
283.0 uH |
253.0 uH |
141.0 uH |
| Total hardness |
9200.0 mg/L |
10950.0 mg/L |
1387.0 mg/L |
| BOD5
|
214.0 mg/L |
384.0 mg/L |
<5.00 mg/L |
| COD |
750.0 mg/L |
607.0 mg/L |
<15.00 mg/L |
| Total alkalinity |
277.2 mg/L |
277.2 mg/L |
71.6 mg/L |
Table 7.
Results of microbiological tests of effluent after treatment station, activated charcoal filtering and bacterial cellulose filtration system.
Table 7.
Results of microbiological tests of effluent after treatment station, activated charcoal filtering and bacterial cellulose filtration system.
| Microorganisms |
After effluent treatment station |
After activated charcoal filtering |
After BC filtration system |
| Thermotolerant Coliforms |
28000 MPN/100 mL |
28000 MPN/100 mL |
<1.8 MPN/100 mL |
| Total coliforms |
28000 MPN/100 mL |
28000 MPN/100 mL |
<1.8 MPN/100 mL |
| Escherichia coli |
28000 MPN/100 mL |
28000 MPN/100 mL |
<1.8 MPN/100 mL |