Submitted:
06 June 2024
Posted:
07 June 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Themes in the Literature
4. Data Analysis and Findings
| Description | Results |
|---|---|
| ABOUT DATA | |
| Timespan | 2013:2023 |
| Sources (Journals, Books, etc) | 3724 |
| Documents | 7000 |
| Annual Growth Rate % | 2,23 |
| Document Average Age | 4,62 |
| Average citations per doc | 14,85 |
| References | 184097 |
| DOCUMENT CONTENTS | |
| Keywords Plus (ID) | 5508 |
| Author's Keywords (DE) | 10860 |
| AUTHORS | |
| Authors | 9581 |
| Authors of single-authored docs | 1096 |
| AUTHORS COLLABORATION | |
| Single-authored docs | 1290 |
| Co-Authors per Doc | 2,68 |
| International co-authorships % | 37,3 |
| DOCUMENT TYPES | |
| Article | 3181 |
| Book chapter | 317 |
| Review | 208 |
| Proceedings | 18 |
4.1. Word Cloud Analysis
4.2. Co-occurrences of Research Terms
4.3. Research Themes Analysis
5. Discussion and Conclusion
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Brammer, S.; Branicki, L.; Linnenluecke, M.; Smith, T. Grand challenges in management research: Attributes, achievements, and advancement. Aust. J. Manag. 2019, 44, 517–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doh, J.; Budhwar, P.; Wood, G. Long-Term Energy Transitions, and International Business: Concepts, Theory, Methods, and a Research Agenda. Journal of International Business Studies. 2021, 52, 951–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verbeke, A. The Long-Term Energy Transition and Multinational Enterprise Complexity: A BJM–JIBS Joint Initiative. Journal of International Business Studies 2021, 52, 803–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eisenhardt, K.M.; Graebner, M.E.; Sonenshein, S. Grand Challenges and Inductive Methods: Rigor without Rigor Mortis. Acad. Manag. J. 2016, 59, 1113–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buckley, P.J.; Doh, J.P.; Benischke, M.H. Towards a renaissance in international business research? Big questions, grand challenges, and the future of IB scholarship. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 2017, 48, 1045–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernhaber, S.A.; Zou, H. Advancing societal grand challenge research at the interface of entrepreneurship and international business: A review and research agenda. J. Bus. Ventur. 2022, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richter, M.; O’Neill, N. The State of the Global Grand Challenges. 2019, Singularity University.
- Wadhwa, V. Solving humanity's grand challenges: Water, food, and energy. Front. Res. Metrics Anal. 2022, 7, 1005119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- United Nations. Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. 2015, New York: United Nations.
- Thomsen, M. R. Grand Challenges! Great Literature? Topics of the Future and Their Consequences for the Past, Journal of World Literature. 2015, 97–106.
- US Office of Science and Technology Policy. 21st Century Grand Challenges. 2015, 80, 116, The White House, US Government, retrieved from: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2015-06-17/pdf/2015-14914.pdf (accessed on 15 August 2023).
- Ye, L.; Pan, S.L.; Wang, J.; Wu, J.; Dong, X. Big data analytics for sustainable cities: An information triangulation study of hazardous materials transportation. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 128, 381–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buckley, P.J. Is the International Business Research Agenda Running out of Steam? Journal of International Business Studies. 2002, 33, 2, 365–373, https://wwwjstororg/stable/3069549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferraro, F.; Etzion, D.; Gehman, J. Tackling Grand Challenges Pragmatically: Robust Action Revisited. Organ. Stud. 2015, 36, 363–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reinecke, J.; Ansari, S. Taming Wicked Problems: The Role of Framing in the Construction of Corporate Social Responsibility. J. Manag. Stud. 2015, 53, 299–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamali, D.; Barkemeyer, R.; Leigh, J.; Samara, G. Open Access, Open Science, and Coronavirus: Mega trends with historical proportions. Bus. Ethic- A Eur. Rev. 2020, 29, 419–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- LO. ILO monitor: COVID-19 and the world of work. Seventh edition: Updated estimates and analysis. 2021, Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/ wcmsp5/groups/public/@dgreports/@dcomm/documents/brief ingnote/wcms_767028.pdf (accessed on 15 August 2023).
- Brammer, S.; Branick, L.; Linnenluecke, M. (Grand challenges in management research: Attributes, achievements, and advancement. Australian Journal of Management. 2019, 44, 517–533.
- Zhao, S.; Gooderham, P.N.; Harzing, A.-W.; Papanastassiou, M. Special Issue: Do multinational enterprise contribute to, or reduce global inequality? Crit. Perspect. Int. Bus. 2021, 17, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Modic, D.; Feldman, M.P. Mapping the human brain: comparing the US and EU Grand Challenges†. Sci. Public Policy 2017. [CrossRef]
- Kim, K.-H.; Kim, M.; Qian, C. Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Corporate Financial Performance: A Competitive-Action Perspective. J. Manag. 2018, 44, 1097–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arslan, A.; Golgeci, I.; Khan, Z.; Al-Tabbaa, O.; Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P. Adaptive learning in cross-sector collaboration during global emergency: conceptual insights in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. Multinatl. Bus. Rev. 2021, 29, 21–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sokolov, A.; Shashnov, S.; Kotsemir, M.; Grebenyuk, A. Quantitative analysis for a better-focused international STI collaboration policy: A case of BRICS. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2019, 147, 221–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aguilera, R.V.; Ciravegna, L.; Cuervo-Cazurra, A.; Gonzalez-Perez, M.A. Multilatinas and the internationalization of Latin American firms. J. World Bus. 2017, 52, 447–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, Y.; Zhang, H. Emerging Market MNEs: Qualitative Review and Theoretical Directions. J. Int. Manag. 2016, 22, 333–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verbeke, A.; Kano, L. The New Internalization Theory and Multinational Enterprises from Emerging Economies: A Business History Perspective. Bus. Hist. Rev. 2015, 89, 415–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bu, M.; Wagner, M. Racing to the bottom and racing to the top: The crucial role of firm characteristics in foreign direct investment choices. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 2016, 47, 1032–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wright, C.; Nyberg, D. Engaging with the contradictions of capitalism: Teaching ‘sustainability in the business school’, in T. Beyes, M. Parker and C. Steyart (eds.) The Routledge Companion to Reinventing Management Education. 2016, London: Routledge.
- Birkle, C.; Pendlebury, D.A.; Schnell, J.; Adams, J. Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity. Quant. Sci. Stud. 2020, 1, 363–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ariaa, M.; Cuccurullo, C. Bibliometrix: an r-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics Journal. 2017, 11, 959–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tricco, A. C.; Lillie, E.; Zarin, W.; O’Brien, K. K.; Colquhoun, H.; Levac, D.; Moher, D.; Peters, M. D. J.; Horsley, T.; Weeks, L.; et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018, 169, 467–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zupic, I.; Cater, T. Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization: A Review. Acad. Manag. Proc. 2015, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stovold, E.; Beecher, D.; Foxlee, R.; Noel-Storr, A. Study flow diagrams in Cochrane systematic review updates: an adapted PRISMA flow diagram. Syst. Rev. 2014, 3, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Paul, J.; Lim, W.M.; O’cass, A.; Hao, A.W.; Bresciani, S. Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR-4-SLR). Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2021, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cobo, M.; Martínez, M.; Gutiérrez-Salcedo, M.; Fujita, H.; Herrera-Viedma, E. 25years at Knowledge-Based Systems: A bibliometric analysis. Knowledge-Based Syst. 2015, 80, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Paolo, C.A.; Wilkinson, K. Get Your Head into the Clouds: Using word clouds for analyzing qualitative assessment data. Tech. Trends 2014, 58, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mulay, P.; Joshi, R.; Chaudhari, A. Distributed Incremental Clustering Algorithms: A Bibliometric and Word-Cloud Review Analysis. Sci. Technol. Libr. 2020, 39, 289–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atenstaedt, R. Word cloud analysis of theBJGP. Br. J. Gen. Pr. 2012, 62, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jamali, D.; Carroll, A. Capturing advances in CSR: Developed versus developing country perspectives. Bus. Ethic- A Eur. Rev. 2017, 26, 321–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamali, D.; Leigh, J.; Samara, G.; Barkemeyer, R. Grand challenges in developing countries: Context, relationships, and logics. Bus. Ethic- Environ. Responsib. 2021, 30, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barkemeyer, R.; Preuss, L.; Ohana, M. Developing country firms and the challenge of corruption: Do company commitments mirror the quality of national-level institutions? Journal of Business Research. 2018, 90, 26–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Preuss, L.; Barkemeyer, R.; Glavas, A. Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Country Multinationals: Identifying Company and Country-Level Influences. Bus. Ethic- Q. 2016, 26, 347–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Omenn, G.S. Grand Challenges and Great Opportunities in Science, Technology, and Public Policy. Science 2006, 314, 1696–1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sinkovics, N.; Archie-Acheampong, J. The social value creation of MNEs – a literature review across multiple academic fields. Crit. Perspect. Int. Bus. 2019, 16, 7–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Callon, M.; Courtial, J. P.; Laville, F. Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: the case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics 1991, 22, 155–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cahlik, T. Comparison of the Maps of Science. Scientometrics 2000, 49, 373–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cobo, M.J.; López-Herrera, A.G.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Herrera, F. An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. J. Informetr. 2011, 5, 146–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corsi, A.; Pagani, R.N.; Kovaleski, J.L.; da Silva, V.L. Technology transfer for sustainable development: Social impacts depicted and some other answers to a few questions. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seoane, M.F.V.; Guagliano, M.L.; Galante, O.; Morales, A.A.A. Transferencia de Tecnologías a una Cooperativa en Argentina: Un Estudio de Caso. J. Technol. Manag. Innov. 2013, 8, 35–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Friel, E.; Patterson, K. Leading innovation through knowledge transfer to social enterprises in Northern Ireland. In Innovation through Knowledge Transfer; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, 2012; Germany, 145–147. [Google Scholar]
- Ye, L.; Pan, S.L.; Wang, J.; Wu, J.; Dong, X. Big data analytics for sustainable cities: An information triangulation study of hazardous materials transportation. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 128, 381–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Freeman, R.E. My Own Book Review. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman 1984.
- Jamali, D.; Karam, C. M.; Blowfield, M. Development oriented CSR. Greenleaf Publishing, 2015.
- Pisani, N.; Kourula, A.; Kolk, A.; Meijer, R. How global is international CSR research? Insights and recommendations from a systematic review. J. World Bus. 2017, 52, 591–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Surroca, J.; Tribó, J.A.; Zahra, S.A. Stakeholder Pressure on MNEs and the Transfer of Socially Irresponsible Practices to Subsidiaries. Acad. Manag. J. 2013, 56, 549–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]






| Themes | Related Keywords | Sample References |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Challenges/Global Grand Challenges | Sustainability Corporate social responsibility |
Omenn, G.S. (2006); Tarnovskaya et al., (2022); Wadhwa, (2022). Brammer et al., (2019); Eisenhardt, et al., (2016); Ferraro, et al., (2015); Jamali, et al., (2021); Pisani, et al., (2017); Thomsen, (2015). |
| International Business Multinational Enterprises |
Internationalization | Bondy and Starkey, (2014); Van Tulder et al., (2021); Montiel, et al., (2022); Sinkovics, et al. (2022); Luo & Zhang, (2016); Verbeke & Kano, (2015); Sinkovics & Archie-acheampong, (2020). |
| Grand challenge and Multinational enterprises | Social innovation | Fernhaber & Zou (2022); Peerally, et al., (2022); Ordonez-Ponce, & Talbot, (2023); Li et al., (2018); Park, (2018); Buckley, et al., (2017); Buckley, (2017); Doh, et., (2021); Zhao, et al., (2021); Preuss, et al., (2016); Surroca, et al., (2013); Verbeke, (2021). |
| Cluster Number | Items |
|---|---|
| Cluster 1 | Africa, Asia, Business Sustanability, Corporate Performance, Developed Market, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Japanese Mnc, Korea, Latin America, Malaysia, North America, Social Trust, Sub Saharan Africa, Thailand |
| Cluster 2 | Chinese Firm, Chinese Mne, Cross Border Merger, Internalization, Parent Company or Firm, Technology Transfer, R&D Internalization, Transaction Cost Theory, Transition Economy |
| Cluster 3 | Carbon Emission, Carbon Footprint, Eastern Europe, Eropean Union, Germany, Hungary, Innovation Policy, Ireland, Netherlands, Poland, Sweden, United State, Tax Haven |
| Cluster 4 | Canada, Cultural Dimension, Greenfield, Sustanability Practice. |
| Cluster 5 | Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain, Climate Change, Digital Technology, Digital Transformation, Grand Challenge, Grand Societal Challenge, Humanity, New Technology, Social Sustanability |
| Cluster 6 | Ghana, African Countries, Social Capital, Social Responsibility, United Nation |
| Cluster 7 | Agriculture, Biodiversity, Food, Food Security, Smart City, Sustanability Transition, Water. |
| Cluster 8 | Environmental Sustanability, Green Chemistry, Mindfulness, Open Innovation, Renewable Energy, Societal Challenge, Sustanability, Sustainable Development. |
| Cluster 9 | Advanced Economy, Australia, Business Relationship, New Zealand, SMEs, Taiwan. |
| Cluster 10 | Pandemic, Global Mobility and Work, International Business Travel. |
| Cluster 11 | Social Innovation, Social Problem, Social Work. |
| Cluster 12 | Environmental Regulation, Natural Environment |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
