Submitted:
24 May 2024
Posted:
27 May 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Research Methodology
4. Results and Findings
| Resilience Strategy | Description |
|---|---|
| Supplier Diversification | Companies source materials and components from multiple suppliers and regions to reduce dependency on a single source, mitigating risks of geopolitical tensions and trade restrictions. |
| Inventory Management | Optimal inventory levels of critical components are maintained to buffer against supply disruptions and price fluctuations, with the use of advanced forecasting techniques. |
| Digital Technologies | Adoption of technologies such as IoT, blockchain, AI, and machine learning improves supply chain visibility, transparency, and responsiveness, enabling data-driven decision-making. |
| Collaboration | Collaboration with suppliers, customers, and industry stakeholders fosters resource sharing, knowledge exchange, and joint problem-solving to address common challenges. |
| Sustainable Practices | Integration of sustainable and circular economy principles minimizes waste, enhances recycling, and reduces environmental impact throughout the supply chain lifecycle. |
| Challenges Faced | Description |
| Geopolitical Risks | Dependency on specific regions or countries for raw materials exposes companies to geopolitical tensions and trade restrictions, leading to supply chain disruptions and price volatility. |
| Cost Considerations | Balancing inventory costs and storage logistics presents challenges, particularly in maintaining optimal inventory levels while minimizing expenses and ensuring timely procurement of materials. |
| Technological Integration | Adoption and integration of digital technologies require significant investment and expertise, posing challenges in terms of implementation, training, and ensuring compatibility with existing systems. |
| Collaboration Barriers | Overcoming barriers to collaboration, such as competitive pressures, conflicting interests, and information sharing concerns, can hinder efforts to establish effective partnerships and collaborative networks within the industry. |
| Regulatory and Policy Constraints | Compliance with regulatory requirements and policy constraints, such as environmental regulations and trade tariffs, adds complexity to supply chain operations and may impact sourcing decisions and production costs. |
| Benefits of Resilience Strategies | Description |
|---|---|
| Risk Mitigation | Implementation of resilience strategies helps companies mitigate risks associated with supply chain disruptions, price inflation, geopolitical tensions, and natural disasters, ensuring continuity in operations. |
| Cost Reduction | Optimal inventory management and supplier diversification contribute to cost reduction by minimizing inventory holding costs, avoiding stockouts, and leveraging competitive pricing from diversified suppliers. |
| Operational Efficiency | Adoption of digital technologies enhances supply chain visibility, transparency, and responsiveness, improving operational efficiency and enabling faster decision-making in response to changing market conditions. |
| Competitive Advantage | Building resilient supply chains provides companies with a competitive advantage by enabling them to respond more effectively to market dynamics, customer demands, and supply chain disruptions. |
| Sustainability | Integration of sustainable practices promotes environmental stewardship, reduces carbon emissions, and enhances corporate social responsibility, aligning with broader industry trends and customer preferences. |
| Impact of Supply Chain Disruptions | Description |
|---|---|
| Project Delays | Disruptions in the supply chain can lead to delays in project timelines, resulting in increased costs, missed deadlines, and potential penalties, impacting overall project profitability and investor confidence. |
| Cost Escalation | Price inflation and supply shortages for critical components can result in cost escalation for renewable energy projects, affecting profitability and financial viability, especially for projects with fixed-price contracts. |
| Operational Disruptions | Interruptions in the supply of materials and components can disrupt manufacturing operations, leading to production slowdowns, idle capacity, and reduced efficiency, affecting overall project performance and revenue. |
| Reputation Damage | Supply chain disruptions can tarnish the reputation of renewable energy companies, eroding stakeholder trust, and confidence, particularly if projects fail to meet contractual obligations or face prolonged delays. |
| Market Uncertainty | Supply chain disruptions contribute to market uncertainty, making it difficult for companies to forecast demand, plan investments, and execute growth strategies, potentially impacting investor confidence and market competitiveness. |
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
References
- Baker McKenzie. (2021). Renewable energy: Rare earths. Retrieved from https://www.bakermckenzie.com/en/insight/publications/2021/05/renewable-energy-rare-earths.
- Chowdhury, P., Paul, S. K., & Kaisar, S. (2021). Modeling and analysis of COVID-19 pandemic impact on global supply chain operations and disruptions: A Bayesian network approach. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 148, 102258. [CrossRef]
- Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2004). Building the resilient supply chain. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 15(2), 1–14. [CrossRef]
- Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Papadopoulos, T., & Hazen, B. (2020). Big data analytics and artificial intelligence pathway to operational performance under the effects of entrepreneurial orientation and environmental dynamism: A study of manufacturing organisations. International Journal of Production Economics, 226, 107603. [CrossRef]
- European Commission. (2020). A European Green Deal. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en.
- GWEC. (2021). Collaboration key to address supply chain disruptions in global wind industry. Retrieved from https://gwec.net/collaboration-key-to-address-supply-chain-disruptions-in-global-wind-industry/.
- Emon, M. H., & Nipa, M. N. (2024). Exploring the Gender Dimension in Entrepreneurship Development: A Systematic Literature Review in the Context of Bangladesh. Westcliff International Journal of Applied Research, 8(1), 34–49. [CrossRef]
- Khan, T., Rahman, S. M., & Hasan, M. M. (2020). Barriers to Growth of Renewable Energy Technology in Bangladesh. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computing Advancements, 1–6. [CrossRef]
- Emon, M. M. H., & Khan, T. (2023). The Impact of Cultural Norms on Sustainable Entrepreneurship Practices in SMEs of Bangladesh. Indonesian Journal of Innovation and Applied Sciences (IJIAS), 3(3), 201–209. [CrossRef]
- Emon, M. M. H., Khan, T., & Siam, S. A. J. (2024). Quantifying the influence of supplier relationship management and supply chain performance: an investigation of Bangladesh’s manufacturing and service sectors. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(2 SE-Research paper), 2015. [CrossRef]
- Hasan, M. M., & Chowdhury, S. A. (2023). RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EDUCATION, EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE, AND SUSTAINABLE BEHAVIOR CHANGE AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS IN BANGLADESH. Education & Learning in Developing Nations, 1(1), 01–04. [CrossRef]
- Hasan, M. M., & Chowdhury, S. A. (2023). Relationship Between Education, Emotional Intelligence, and Sustainable Behavior Change Among College Students in Bangladesh. Education & Learning in Developing Nations, 1(1), 1–4. [CrossRef]
- Haque, M. A., Akter, S., & Ferdous, A. (2021). Rare earth elements: Critical material for green technologies and supply chain risks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 313, 127927. [CrossRef]
- IEA. (2022). Renewable energy market update: Overview of renewable energy market trends in 2021 – Q4 edition. International Energy Agency. https://www.iea.org/reports/renewable-energy-market-update/overview-of-renewable-energy-market-trends-in-2021-q4-edition.
- Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2020). A digital supply chain twin for managing the disruption risks and resilience in the era of Industry 4.0. Production Planning & Control, 31(2–3), 63–74. [CrossRef]
- Kalyuzhnova, Y., Nygaard, C., & Freeman, M. (2021). Trade policy and the solar industry: Resilience through policy uncertainty. Energy Policy, 149, 112042. [CrossRef]
- Mor, S., Mani, V., Gunasekaran, A., & Kumar, A. (2021). Big data analytics, sustainable supply chain management and firm performance: A developing country perspective. Annals of Operations Research, 300(1–2), 371–398. [CrossRef]
- Pettit, T. J., Fiksel, J., & Croxton, K. L. (2013). Ensuring supply chain resilience: Development and implementation of an assessment tool. Journal of Business Logistics, 34(1), 46–76. [CrossRef]
- Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Shen, L. (2019). Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2117–2135. [CrossRef]
- UNCTAD. (2021). Review of maritime transport 2021. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/rmt2021_en.pdf.
- Vestas. (2021). Vestas leads industry-first recycling collaboration with Jysk Glas. Retrieved from https://www.vestas.com/en/media/company-news?n=2368492.
- World Economic Forum. (2020). The future of jobs report 2020. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs_2020.pdf.
- European Union. (2021). The European Green Deal. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en.
- Global Wind Energy Council. (2020). Global wind report 2020. Retrieved from https://gwec.net/global-wind-report-2020/.
- International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). (2021). World energy transitions outlook: 1.5°C pathway. Retrieved from https://www.irena.org/publications/2021/Mar/World-Energy-Transitions-Outlook-2021.
- Kukreti, A., & Pareek, M. (2020). Role of blockchain in supply chain management: A systematic review. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 34(3), 661–693. [CrossRef]
- Lin, T. C., & Chen, Y. S. (2020). The impact of green supply chain management on sustainable performance: A moderating role of environmental uncertainty. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 136, 101804. [CrossRef]
- Emon, M. M. H., Khan, T., & Siam, S. A. J. (2024). Quantifying the influence of supplier relationship management and supply chain performance: an investigation of Bangladesh’s manufacturing and service sectors. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(2 SE-Research paper), 2015. [CrossRef]
- Möhring, N., Müller, J. M., & Stölzle, W. (2020). Supply chain flexibility and resilience: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 50(9), 833–865. [CrossRef]
- Natarajan, V. (2019). Sustainable supply chain management practices and performance. In Handbook of Research on Green Supply Chain Management for Sustainable Development (pp. 223–241). IGI Global. [CrossRef]
- Pereira, S. C. F., & Poldi, K. (2020). Digital supply chain integration for enhanced sustainability: A case study of 3D printing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 274, 122835. [CrossRef]
- Emon, M. M. H., Khan, T., Rahman, M. A., Bukari, Z., & Chowdhury, M. S. A. (2024). Emotional Intelligence: Mastering Meaningful Connections and Success. Notion Press.
- Russo, I., & Comi, A. (2020). The potential role of blockchain in supply chain management: A mapping of supply chain inefficiencies. International Journal of Production Economics, 229, 107884. [CrossRef]
- Santoso, T., Hui, T. Y., & Supriyanto, M. (2020). The impact of digitalization on supply chain agility, supply chain visibility and supply chain performance: The empirical evidence from Indonesian logistics companies. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 13(3), 421–446. [CrossRef]
- Rahman, M. A., Khan, T., Emon, M. M. H., Bukari, Z., & Nath, A. (2024). The New Marketing Paradigm: From Traditional to Digital. In Notion Press.
- Serrano-Hernandez, A., & Aach, J. (2020). The effect of collaboration on supply chain resilience. Journal of Business Research, 114, 266–279. [CrossRef]
- Emon, M. M. H., Khan, T., Rahman, M. A., Bukari, Z., & Chowdhury, M. S. A. (2024). Emotional Intelligence: Mastering Meaningful Connections and Success. Notion Press.
- Sodhi, M. S., Son, B. G., & Tang, C. S. (2020). Researchers’ perspectives on supply chain risk management. International Journal of Production Economics, 221, 107476. [CrossRef]
- Srinivasan, M. M., & Geng, Y. (2020). Information visibility in supply chains: Examining the role of digital technologies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 255, 120176. [CrossRef]
- Emon, M. M. H., Khan, T., & Siam, S. A. J. (2024). Quantifying the influence of supplier relationship management and supply chain performance: an investigation of Bangladesh’s manufacturing and service sectors. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(2 SE-Research paper), 2015. [CrossRef]
- Stock, J. R., & Boyer, S. L. (2009). Developing a consensus definition of supply chain management: A qualitative study. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 39(8), 690–711. [CrossRef]
- Sugathan, A., & Arunachalam, V. P. (2020). Digital supply chain management practices and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Indian manufacturing companies. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(4), 1333–1351. [CrossRef]
- Rahman, M. A., Khan, T., Emon, M. M. H., Bukari, Z., & Nath, A. (2024). The New Marketing Paradigm: From Traditional to Digital. In Notion Press.
- Tachizawa, E. M., Wong, C. Y., & Wong, C. W. Y. (2019). Supply chain integration and environmental sustainability: Moderating roles of perceived values and environmental uncertainty. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 122, 386–398. [CrossRef]
- Emon, M. M. H., Khan, T., & Siam, S. A. J. (2024). Quantifying the influence of supplier relationship management and supply chain performance: an investigation of Bangladesh’s manufacturing and service sectors. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(2 SE-Research paper), 2015. [CrossRef]
- UNCTAD. (2020). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on trade and development: Transitioning to a new normal. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/osg2020d1_en.pdf.
- van Hoek, R., & Chatham, R. (2019). Supply chain strategy: The logistics of supply chain management. Pearson Education Limited.
- Varsei, M., & Kishawy, H. A. (2016). A framework for measuring sustainability of supply chain management practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 784–798. [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. H. (2008). Green supply chain management: Pressures, practices and performance within the Chinese automobile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1553–1562. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).