Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Review

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Vendor Partnerships in Sustainable Supply Chain in Indian Electric Two-Wheeler Industry – A Systematic Review of Literature

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

17 May 2024

Posted:

17 May 2024

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
UN Convention on Climate Change 2015 mandates reducing carbon footprint to reduce global warming. Considering environmental concerns, Electric Vehicles (EVs) spearhead the move towards green mobility. Niti Aayog (Indian Government) has envisaged an “EV only” scenario by 2030. Two wheelers dominate the Indian automobile industry with almost 80% market share. With the transportation sector accounting for 70% of world’s fossil fuels use, the need for a sustainable supply chain which addresses environment, economy and societal issues, has, of late, aroused interest in the business academic community and industries. Sustainability in business decision-making promotes efficiency, controls expenditure, enhances customer delight, increases sales and market share, optimises risk management strategy, and promotes profitability. This study intends to develop a conceptual framework after examining research gaps in sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) and allied topics like sustainability, green supply chain management, and vendor partnerships through collaborative efforts. Even the UN vide Goal 9 of sustainable goals pertaining to industry, highlights the importance of this framework.
Keywords: 
Supply chain management
;  
SSCM
;  
sustainability
;  
environmental concerns
;  
electric vehicles (EV)
;  
ICE vehicles
;  
Li-ion batteries
;  
vendor partnerships
;  
vendor management strategy (VMS)
;  
electric two wheelers (E2W)
Subject: 
Business, Economics and Management  -   Other

Introduction

The quest for clean energy aided by government regulations, and a proactively pro-planet zeitgeist, have hastened the move towards electric vehicles (EVs). The United Nations (UN) Convention on Climate Change 2015 (S. Seethalakshmi & K. Shyamala, 2019) aims at reduction of the carbon footprint. Regions and countries followed suit in adoption of their own regulations. The “Fit for 55” program of the European Union (EU) seeks 55% reduction in greenhouse emissions through a combination of policies and measures with a target of 2030; and the US government set a 50 percent target for EVs by 2030 (Cornet et al., 2021).
20% of global CO2 emissions emanate from transport use [it rises to 24% for emissions from energy] (Ritchie, 2020), which is true for 2Ws in India too where the urban particulate emissions owe 30% to 2Ws (PM2.5) (Paladugula et al., 2018). India imports 85% of its oil needs (Anand et al., 2023), with impact on geopolitical resilience. Simultaneously, while EVs will lead to increased efficacy of energy consumption, the demand for power would go up, apart from the cascading disruptions in the entire automotive supply chain (Gandhi & Sheorey, 2019).
The Indian auto industry follows China and USA, being the 3rd largest (ANI, 2023). Two-wheelers (2W) constitute almost 80% (numbers; not value) of the automobile sector in India (Paladugula et al., 2018; SIAM, 2022; Sripad et al., 2019):
India has a clear preference for 2W and 3W (Jacob, 2023), and hence, electric bikes and scooters (E2W) have ample scope (Khande et al., 2020), with the E2W market expected to have a CAGR growth of 29.07% to reach $ 1.3 billion by 2028 (Dhaked & Birla, 2021). With comparatively smaller batteries E2W do not unduly strain the limited charging infrastructure (public) (Sripad et al., 2019), rendering it more environmentally friendly.
The nascent E2W industry continues to need government policy support to push sales (Phadke & Nalam, 2021). The first phase of FAME (FY 2015-2016 to FY 2018-2019) supported slow- and high-speed E2W. FAME II (FY 2019-2020 to FY 2021-2022), seeks to add incentives to lead to sales of a million high-speed E2W that use batteries with advanced chemistry, implying efficiency in the manufacturing processes, an effective supply chain, and effective vendor management.
Ironically, in spite of its potential, E2W in India has not really been well researched. K. Indu & M. Aswatha Kumar (2022), speak on need for EV research (in a broader sense) and opportunities as also challenges for this industry. Some works like Nayak et al., (2023), cover E2W-related subjects like state-of-the-art energy systems, new materials and approaches, hybrid motor and engine setups, clever braking technologies with regenerative techniques etc; Ramji et al. (2023), analyse the potential EV sales required in major 2W export markets for India, like Nepal and Chile, based on their stated EV targets and pledges for year 2030; but, the topics do not directly address the E2W supply chain.
This paper investigates impact of vendor/ supplier partnerships on sustainable supply chain performance and competitiveness of Indian E2W industry, which would further lead to the formulation of a research (conceptual) framework based on research gaps identified through literature review.
This review seeks answers to the below given research questions:
RQ1: Existing research in the past decade in SSCM and vendor partnership, especially and if possible, as related to EVs.
RQ2: What research gaps emerge from the above analysis?
RQ3: Development of a conceptual framework connecting strategic partnerships with SSCM in the EV industry in India.
The paper is being covered in the succeeding heads: Introduction giving a background of the Indian EV industry and especially E2W; Literature Review on sustainability, SSCM, vendor partnership and collaboration; Conceptual Framework as these relate to the Indian E2W industry; and finally, Areas for Future Research and Conclusions.

Literature Review

For a comprehensive review of the research gaps, over 157 research articles published in 79 different journals, and 15 Reports were perused. The selected research articles pertain to sustainability, SSCM, green supply chain management, vendor or supplier collaborations or strategic partnerships, automobiles, automobile engineering and EVs. Effective references of reputed publishers like Emerald Insight, Springer, Wiley, Elsevier, SAGE, MDPI, and Taylor & Francis have been made. Articles published in Government websites and widely-circulated national newspapers were referred.
The outcomes of literature review against respective subjects are explained in the following paragraphs.

Need and Scope

The need for EVs to proliferate across the world and primarily in developing countries like India cannot be overstated. Satya Sai Surya Varun et al. (2023) examine smart mobility solutions, finding significant potential for EVs to address global concerns. Similarly, Hema & Venkatarangan (2022); Sreeram et al. (2019), explore outlooks of various EV technologies and areas for further growth. Kesari et al. (2019), adopt a global case-study approach on adopting EVs, to draw lessons tailor-made for India. K & P (2023) analyse how EVs can help India keep the 5 pledges: to achieve net-zero emission (2050); generate 500 GW non-fossil energy (2030); half the energy generated to be from renewable sources; reduce 1000 million tonnes of greenhouse gases; and, reduce intensity of economy’s carbon emissions to less than 45%.
Prajeesh & Pillai (2022) follow a 7-C attempt to gain insights into the future of Indian mobility, a mobility paradigm with dependence on connectivity, commonality, convenience, and state-of-the-art infrastructure for reducing congestion. Dutt (2023) employs multi-level perspective (MLP) in studying how the E2W socio-technical system evolved.

Barriers and Adoption of EVs

Over the years EVs and their proliferation was impeded by apprehensions on higher initial costs, lifetime costs, charging concerns with lack of suitable points, and of course, a lack of overall awareness on the technology, as discovered by Tarei et al. (2021); R. Kumar et al., 2020. It is logical that an understanding of barriers would assist in policy and decision making. Dixit & Singh (2022) used a machine learning model to predict EV purchase in India, arriving at the conclusion that while buyer-age, gender, salaries, environment issues, performance and lifetime cost, range-anxiety and market forces are significant predictors, some other expected parameters like education levels and government subsidies do not play a significant part. Patyal et al. (2021) studied 13 barriers using ISM (Interpretive Structure Modelling) and MICMAC (Matriced’ Impacts Croisés Appliquéeá un Classement), to help policymakers, and EV manufacturers to overcome design constraints.
Virmani et al. (2023) use fuzzy-SWARA (Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis) method and fuzzy-WASPAS (Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment) to attribute weight to each of the EV barriers, with the main barriers being higher vehicle price and lack of adequate charging stations; to be overcome through government policy, support and strategic planning.
Javanmardi et al. (2023) investigate factors affecting EV adoption, and expectedly find higher penetration in countries where the levels of sustainable development are higher. With regard to sales promotions, Bhattacharyya et al. (2023) explore and rank a dozen significant manufacturer challenges, using the triangular fuzzy number (TFN) method. They too find limitations in charging infrastructure to be a big challenge towards penetration, as do S. Mishra et al. (2021).
Saw & Kedia (2023) carried out a case study in Delhi, UP, Gujarat and Karnataka and found that in order to achieve a penetration of 30% EVs, by 2030 these states would need to register 0.31, 1.51, 0.88 & 0.79 million EVs. Digalwar & Rastogi (2023) demonstrate reluctance for EV adoption amongst those who place a premium on the vehicle performance. The study by Chawla et al. (2023) uses factor analysis to determine what exactly influences buyers’ behaviour towards EVs touching upon parameters like loyalty, range and motor efficiency, charging efficacy etc. R. Kumar et al. (2020) explore how a shared economy in conjunction with public transport affect EV adoption, keeping the affordability of the Indian consumer in mind.

Policy

FAME (Faster Adoption and Manufacture of Hybrid and Electric Vehicles) scheme was adopted in 2015, which enabled the Indian EV market to grow in leaps and bounds, displaying the importance of government policy. Notwithstanding this, V. Singh et al. (2021) found that India has been falling behind other countries in EVs due to lack of an explicit policy or strategy. P. K. Das & Bhat (2022) bring out the role of government in facilitating EV proliferation.
The Indian EV market valuation in 2020 was $5.47 billion, projected to reach $17.01 billion by 2026 (CAGR 23.47% over 2021-2026) (Mordor Intelligence, 2023). By 2030, GoI rooted for ‘E-Vehicles Only’ (Dhawan et al., 2017; Khurana et al., 2020), in a way showing the government commitment for proliferating EVs.
V. Singh et al. (2021) carry out a SWOC analysis to encourage policy makers, governments, businesses to incentivise EVs in India, with the Centre coordinating state activities. Asokan et al. (2023) explore EV policies and environmental and socio-economic impacts in India, with focus on battery wastes and advocate a safe working environment for workers and communities. Mahajan et al. (2023) carryout an insightful analysis on parliament questions on EV policy to prevent air pollution.
Srivastava et al. (2022); B M Honna Prabhu Lingegowda & Dr. A N Santosh Kumar (2022), discuss methodology for design and selection of governmental policies, challenges & mitigation, to boost Indian EV adoption vis-à-vis a global perspective. While most government policies focus on subsidies, Shrimali (2021) found that only 4W personal cars and long-haul trucks need subsidy, and that upfront subsidy was most effective. Sometimes policies can also impede growth as found by Soman et al. (2019) through policy, supply chain and finance challenges.

Sustainability

Carter & Rogers, 2008 describe sustainability in management parlance and in operations to encompass societal, environment and economy concerns, which is lacking as discovered by Panigrahi et al., 2019. The balance in the three aforesaid concerns was found to be elusive and complex by (Sezen & Çankaya, 2013; Yildiz Çankaya & Sezen, 2019). Brundtland World Commission on Environment and Development (Holden et al., 2014) defined sustainability as “a development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.”
Its criticality in supply chain and operations management was put forth by De Brito & Van der Laan, 2010. Per Carter and Rogers (2008), organisations considering environment and society in their efforts, prove competitive in the long run.

Sustainable SCM (SSCM) & Green SCM (GSCM)

The evolution of SCM into SSCM is natural in a world fast moving towards green practices. Industries need to be sustainable in production and supply chains. Sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) ensures that supply chains (SC) are run such that it integrates the objectives of the exercise as articulated by the firm as well as other stakeholders (Fritz, 2019). By integrating environment and social factors to the conventional supply chain, operational competitiveness is achieved (Hong et al., 2018).
Based on 3BL approach, Carter and Rogers (2008) defines SSCM as “the strategic, transparent integration and achievement of an organization’s social, environmental, and economic goals in the systemic coordination of key inter-organizational business processes for improving the long-term economic performance of the individual company and its supply chains.”
Seuring & Müller (2008) defined SSCM as: “The management of material, information and capital flows as well as cooperation among companies along the supply chain while taking goals from all three dimensions of sustainable development, i.e., economic, environmental and social, into account which are derived from customer and stakeholder requirements.”
Empirical investigations in SSCM in recent years is growing in developing countries (Najjar et al., 2020; Sánchez-Flores et al., 2020). Hong, et al. (2018) observe the inadequacy of SSCM research in developing countries (Sánchez-Flores et al., 2020). Further, most empirical studies on SSCM deal with environmental and economic dimensions, without attempting to identify and address social or environmental aspects of the supply chain (D. Das, 2018; D. Das, 2017).
SSCM can boost competitiveness contrary to popular belief. Chikán et al. (2022); Gopal & Thakkar (2016), analyse competitiveness as a business performance in strategic management by examining functional strategies like production and operations management. Counter-intuitively, empirical investigations in Chinese firms (Wang & Dai, 2018) revealed that while SSCM had positive impact on firm’s environment and social performance, its impact on the monetary performance was not seen.
Winter & Knemeyer (2013) reiterated that internal conflicts may warrant an uneven balance in the three concerns for supply chain sustainability. Fritz (2019) took on ethical concerns in SSCM, and drawing the link between SSCM and sustainable development goals (SDGs). Panigrahi et al. (2019) introduced additional dimensions of performance and governance, bringing out the existence of research gap in collaboration between suppliers and customers to enhance SSCM. The authors have recommended industry specific research on SSCM.
Overall, SSCM research appears predominantly on green or environmental issues, with inadequate coverage of societal issues and the interplay of the above sustainability dimensions (Sánchez-Flores et al., 2020).
Environmental aspects of sustainable supply chain can be clubbed under GSCM. Fritz (2019) brings out the difference between GSCM and SSCM, saying that GSCM covers only environmental performance, whereas SSCM covers social, environmental and economic performance. He is of the opinion that GSCM is part of SSCM, although no consensus exists. He derived GSCM concepts which encompassed all supply chain stages which include design, purchase, supply, manufacturing, packaging, warehousing, transport and customers.
Gong et al. (2019) conducted exhaustive literature review on GSCM and observed significant increase in studies on this subject in the past decade, albeit with focus on qualitative analysis, with ample scope for quantitative and empirical analysis. Wong et al. (2015) threw light on the concept of green supply chain integration (GSCI) in organisations which encompasses internal GSCM, supplier GSCI, customer GSCI and community GSCI. With regard to supplier GSCI, in order to achieve environmental enhancements, a healthy collaborative structure with the suppliers is mandated. This may involve support and sharing of resources with suppliers.
Yildiz Çankaya & Sezen (2019) find that green manufacturing practices fully supported all three dimensions, with scope for further research on integration into other parameters of sustainability. Geng et al. (2017) perused research articles published during the period 1996 to 2015 related to emerging economies in Asia and found that GSCM led to improved performance economically, environmentally and operationally but not socially.
Luthra et al. (2016) studied impact of six CSFs on GSCM towards sustainable supply chain in automobile industries in India, viz, internal management, customer management, regulatory, supplier management (strong partnership with suppliers), social and competitiveness. The study brought out that all these CSFs significantly impact GSCM. Their recommendations for future study include exploring other parameters like flexibility, delivery, quality and technology advancements in performance. They want the study to be extended to other geographically diversified industries, and the social parameters too.

SSCM & GSCM in Indian Automobile Industry

Barriers and hurdles for setting up an effective SSCM for Indian automobile industry, have been studied (Jamwal et al., 2022; Luthra, Luthra, et al., 2015) Jamwal et al., (2022). Digalwar et al. (2021) validates seven factors with 67 variables, that affect the sustainable manufacturing of EVs in India, to benefit original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and service providers in the EV industry.
Mathivathanan et al. (2018) have studied SSCM practices in Indian automotive industry, taking a multi-stakeholder view, by examining vendors, suppliers, OEMs, MSMEs, distributors, transporters, franchisees and exporters. Critical success factors (CSFs) of GSCM for achieving sustainability and profitability in Indian automobile industry have been studied (Luthra et al., 2016; Luthra, Garg, et al., 2015).
Gopal & Thakkar (2016) empirically look at the sustainable supply chain practices in the competitive Indian automobile industry. R. Kumar & Bangwal (2022) carry out an assessment of sustainable supply chain initiatives in Indian automobile industry using the PPS method, whereas Sonar et al. (2022) study SSCM of the automotive sector in context to the circular economy laying out a strategic framework in the process.
J. Singh et al. (2023) understand that resilience and a resilience strategy in the supply chain can be a primary factor in ensuring sustainability in automobile sector. They offer good inputs on how to optimise vendor management while simultaneously ensuring sustainability. R. Mishra et al. (2022) offer insight on development of environmental collaboration among supply chain partners for sustainable consumption & production.
Environmentally conscious SCM process benefits the industry as a whole and the Indian EV sector by association, as found by Balakrishnan & Suresh (2018). Liu et al. (2016) call it environmental management in the role of supply chain capabilities in the auto sector. Taking another angle, Gedam et al. (2021) study the correlation of sustainable manufacturing and green human resources, for success in the automotive sector. Sezen & Çankaya (2013) examine green manufacturing and eco-innovation on sustainability performance. Luthra, Garg, et al. (2014) carry out an empirical analysis of green SCM practices in Indian automobile industry, which is relevant to the EV industry also since the complete process of production, distribution, warehousing, franchising, transportation, exports, sales and after sales support, are common to both. Ghosh et al. (2022) take up the automobile manufacturing units in India, and study an optimal strategic sourcing model for green SCM.

Economic Perspective & Profitability

The primary objective of any business unit is profitability. As per Panigrahi et al. (2019), sustainability should lead to profitability, judiciously balancing profits, protecting the environment and upholding social responsibilities. D. Das (2017) considers operational performance instead of economic performance, explaining that economic performance is macro in nature and includes dimensions like decrease in cost of production and energy cost. Some other economic dimensions considered in literature are financial outcomes, cost reductions, competitiveness and profits (Winter & Knemeyer, 2013); operating cost, total sales, employees’ wages & benefits (Gopal & Thakkar, 2016); market share and returns on the investment made along with profitability (Wang & Dai, 2018); and, productivity, firm’s edge and customer satisfaction (Luthra et al., 2016). The economic dimensions also consider competitive priorities like cost, delivery, quality, flexibility (Sopadang et al., 2017), innovation and customer focus. S. Kumar & Dutt (2022) have interrelated Financial Performance and Inventory Management, which deals with many aspects of vendor management as well as the supply chain, in specific, with the Indian automobile industry.

Environmental Aspects

While India’s declared intent is carbon neutrality and the target year is 2070, the role of EVs in promoting clean air has been addressed by Hossain, Fang, Ma, Huang, & Dai, 2023; and Hossain, Fang, Ma, Huang, Peng, et al., 2023. Research indicated cutting 80% pollution from road transport by 2070 in India. They cite fuel cell vehicles as a viable alternative to EVs. Gupta & Garg (2020) drive home the need to green our transport system to achieve carbon-neutrality in keeping with the Paris Agreement (IPCC, 2018).
Shyam et al. (2023) deal with the challenges in Lithium-Ion Batteries (LIB) disposal focusing on the availability, storage, and transportation of LIB. Vidhi & Shrivastava (2018); Bhosale & Mastud (2023) opine that EVs can lead to reduction in pollution only majority of the electricity used for charging, emanates from renewable sources. Gautam et al. (2023) address environmental issues of the Indian automobile industry, using SWOT analysis, and allocating scores to each environmental factor. The health impact of the transition to EVs has been examined by Hsieh et al. (2022), by looking at emissions, air quality and effect on individual health through the transition to EVs in China.

Green Energy

EVs often face criticism that energy being used to power or charge EVs is not fully green as yet, since a significant proportion of energy produced is from coal and other polluting sources. This paradox is adequately covered in research (Dixon et al., 2020). The extensive proliferation of EVs will necessitate higher energy production with corresponding impact on the electric grid (Kapustin & Grushevenko, 2020; Desai et al., 2023).
Abhyankar et al. (2023) explore the heavy dependence on imported oil (90%) and industrial coking coal (80%), which exposes us to volatility in global energy markets. They focus on the 3 major consumers – power, transport and industry. Han (2023) analyse India’s new and renewable energy market policies and implications for foreign cooperation.
A comprehensive green process will encompass generation of power, charging, and its ultimate disposal of storage devices. In this context, A.V. et al. (2022) study the feasibility of solar cell integrated energy storage devices for EVs. Makeen et al. (2022) evaluate efficacy and adequacy of green charging attempted by centralized EV stations, and find greater effort is needed. Gulzari et al. (2022) have worked on a young consumer EV rental behavioural model to analyse all these issues.
Yang et al. (2023) look into battery swapping in 3 scenarios: no subsidy, consumer subsidisation and provider subsidisation, finding that it is more effective to subsidise service providers rather than the end consumers. Varshney et al. (2020) covers recycling LIBs, and new recycling techniques like pyrometallurgy, hydrometallurgy and green technologies. Ourici (2023) explores new battery technologies with new cathode and anode materials such as silicon, lithium-sulphur, and lithium-air. Solid-state electrolytes have also been explored to improve safety and longevity. Eftekhari & Kim (2018) find that sodium ion battery (NIB) can supplement but not replace the LIB. Manivannan et al. (2023) review the wireless power transfer (WPT) system. Shu et al. (2023) explore variable renewables for flexible EV charging for decarbonisation of the rapidly growing power sector. Barman et al. (2023) use a systematic literature survey to explore the battery raw material supply chain, material processing, and commodity price appreciation. Areas of concern include resource reserves, supply, demand, geographical distribution, battery reuse, and recycling industries. Shaikh et al. (2023) review the battery and power related aspects of Indian EV sector.
Energy eventually is but a geopolitical play of nations, and lithium is the new gold (Penn & Lipton, 2021) which will make nations plan accordingly. Nygaard (2022) discusses the geopolitical risks and strategic uncertainty after the Ukraine war, analysing how the circular economy can decrease market power of and resources dependency on critical minerals. Li & Taghizadeh-Hesary (2022) explore the economic feasibility of green hydrogen and fuel cell electric vehicles for transportation in China.

Green Manufacturing

Industries follow green manufacturing norms to meet governmental regulations and establish processes compatible with modern world environmental concerns. P. L. Singh et al. (2022) analyse the CSF of green manufacturing towards sustainability, specifically in the automotive sector, also studying recent trends in industrial and production engineering. Internet of Things (IoT) is increasingly facilitating how machinery and products talk to each other, with immense application in the automobile industry. Naim et al. (2022) seek to find the relevance of green manufacturing and IoT in industrial transformation, marketing management, and computational intelligence techniques for green smart cities.
J. Singh, Singh, & Deepak (2022) review green manufacturing, calling it a modern era for Indian manufacturing industries. Umar et al. (2022) analyse developed versus developing world vis-à-vis utilising emerging technologies in implementation of green practices. Using a unique technique, Pathak et al. (2021) analysed the barriers to green manufacturing using the hybrid approach, focusing on the automobile industry.

Social Perspective

It is noted from the literatures on GSCM that there is a vacuum with regard to social performance in research, while the environmental and economic factors have been exhaustively covered (Yildiz Çankaya & Sezen, 2019). Mani et al. (2020) studied societal sustainability in small and medium manufacturing enterprises (SME’s) and its impact on performance of a firm analysing six social factors which included parity, security, charity, healthiness and welfare, integrities and basic rights.
Ahmadi et al. (2017) studied social aspects of supply chains using best-worst method in manufacturing industries of Iran, considering predominantly the health and safety issues at work. Zhang et al. (2017) carried out a qualitative case study in pharmaceutical industries located in USA, China, Europe, Japan and South Asia on social aspects of sustainability supply chain by considering supplier development aspects, finding that social responsibility of the supply chain can be enhanced through collaborative training after assessment is carried out of gaps that may exist in the suppliers’ capabilities, and they come out with recommendations to link development of suppliers with other SCM practices.
Overall, the lack of substantial studies on social perspectives for sustainability in the supply chain, was apparent.

Supply Chain Practices

A ‘supply chain’ has been adequately defined by Chopra & Meindl, 2016. Soares et al. (2023) use bibliometric and systematic reviews to achieve state-of-the-art in EV supply chains. They employ quantitative and qualitative indicators to identify supply chain risks. Jones et al. (2023) examine outlook for EV demand juxtaposed with supply chain demand trends.
Koberg & Longoni (2019) after systematic ROL on SSCM in the global supply chains, classified research articles of 15 years into two categories: configurations and governance mechanisms related to suppliers. D. Das (2018) reviewed supply chain integration, finding that there is not much significance of practices on performance parameters, which may be due to selection of heterogeneous sectors and biased responses. They recommended future study to be limited to a particular industry for consistent results. The importance of having in place a supplier partnership at a strategic level coupled with good customer relations empowered with optimal and quality info-sharing, has been studied by Gamini & Rajapaksa, 2020; strategic collaboration and the modalities of external and internal sharing of knowledge (Mehdikhani & Valmohammadi, 2019); information sharing (Khan et al., 2016; Liao et al., 2021); sustainable procurement practices which focuses on in-house and outsourcing modes (Sayed et al., 2021); green & ethical supply management (Kähkönen et al., 2017); and, supplier innovativeness, information sharing and strategic sourcing (Jermsittiparsert & Rungsrisawa, 2019).
Lee (2021) conducted empirical study on SCM strategies and their effects on operations and competencies of SMEs in Korea. Overall, significant relationship between SCM practices and organizational performances including innovation has been established. Kähkönen et al. (2017) drew upon the need to undertake further research on practices in collaboration between suppliers and vendors. Liao et al. (2021) studied Taiwan’s optoelectronics industry and found that such a collaboration can actually positively impact innovation further improving competitiveness of the firm.

SCM in the Automobile Industry

Bhattacharya (2014) studied the complexities and challenges of SCM in Indian automotive industry, and how they may be addressed with implications for the EV industry too. The study by Gopal & Thakkar (2016), focuses on SSCM practices of Indian automobile industries like lean practices, eco-design practices, continuous improvement, risk management practices, customer cooperation ethical behaviour, investment recovery and technological innovation. These are considered for assessing supply chain performance including social dimensions like child labour, disclosure of environmental initiatives to the public, employee wellbeing, training and education operating cost. The study finds that SSCM positively impact supply chain performance. They recommend that automobile companies in India can encourage vendors towards sustainability, perhaps by sharing initial costs as a motivational tool.
Luthra, Qadri, et al. (2014) identify CSFs to achieve optimal level of green SCM performances and profitability in Indian automobile industry. Khot & Thiagarajan (2019) study resilience, correlating it with sustainability of the supply chain in the Indian automobile industry. Kumar Singh & Modgil (2023) study lean practices in automobile sector, which faces numerous challenges like regulation, labour, high initial costs etc, which are well-documented by Mathivathanan et al. (2022), with overcoming strategies.
Critical components in the EV industry like batteries and electric drives and for autonomous driving like light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensors and radar sensors are likely to reach 52% of total market size by 2030. Components only used in ICE vehicles such as conventional transmissions, engines, and fuel injection systems would reduce to around 11% by 2030 (about 50% of 2019 levels), forcing traditional component players to adapt quickly to offset decreasing revenue streams (Cornet et al., 2021). The EV industry has attracted more than $400 billion in investments over the last decade—with about $100 billion of that coming since the beginning of 2020 (Cornet et al., 2021). All this will significantly impact the supply chain in the Indian automobile industry.

Logistics/ Industry 4.0 Concepts

Logistics 4.0 is a new science to enhance efficiencies of logistic support and SCM. Ghadge et al. (2022); P. L. Singh et al. (2022), study the link between Industry 4.0 and green SCM in the automotive industry, and show their compatibility, thereby alleviating concerns that green practices adversely impact profitability or commercial performance. Fauzdar et al. (2022) carry out a MICMAC analysis of Industry 4.0 in the Indian automotive industry. The process of correlating the techniques of green smart manufacturing in the Indian automotive industry, analysing and prioritizing the barriers to the same; and examining how it can be used to implement Industry 4.0 using the AHP technique, has been done in the study by Agarwal et al. (2022).

Vendor Collaboration or Strategic Vendor Partnership

Vendor Collaboration has been brought out as a partnership which works towards mutual benefit of the parties involved (Cao & Zhang, 2011; Spekman & Davis, 2016; Fritz, 2019; Panigrahi et al., 2019; Wang & Dai, 2018). Researchers highlight that competitiveness of firms can be boosted by focusing on core business and outsourcing noncore activities (Soosay et al., 2008; Soosay & Hyland, 2015).
Kuzma et al. (2020) established a strong relationship between innovation (including in vendor collaboration) and sustainability performances. Hui et al. (2015) empirically studied partnership management and supplier collaboration on innovation performance of Chinese manufacturing companies, finding its direct effect on innovation performance, transfer of wide information, knowledge and technology. Hudnurkar et al. (2014) through ROL found inadequacy of study on supply chain collaboration in Indian context. Most research failed to draw a connection between vendor collaboration and impact on lengthy partnerships (Ramanathan & Gunasekaran, 2014).
Literature shows that VMI is a competitive and flexible business model SCM tool for reducing the inventory management cost (Beheshti et al., 2020), for which Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) and info-sharing is critical. Similarly, Owusu Kwateng et al. (2022); Radzuan et al. (2018), studied Malaysian manufacturing industries and found that VMI reduces operational cost and improves customer satisfaction. Shin et al. (2019) established a direct correlation between levels of partnership and performance. Future research on impact of collaboration on resiliency of supply chain has been suggested (Chen et al., 2017; Mehdikhani & Valmohammadi, 2019).

Vendor Partnerships in Indian Automobile Industry

Sahu et al. (2022) study supplier selection using a decision making model, which employs an integrated MCDM approach with evidence from the Indian automotive sector. Vendor selection in the Indian automotive industry has been studied through a case study by Jain et al. (2018); Dang et al. (2022), who have created a Two-Stage Multi-Criteria Supplier Selection Model for sustainability in supply chains in automobile industry; and Sytch et al. (2022) who have studied the practices for the selection of suppliers to ensure lasting global supply chain networks. Juned & Farooquie (2022) study VMI factors in automotive industries from two different perspectives (from buyers & vendors), comparing the perceptions of professionals and academia.
Some term lean and agile practices as ‘leagile’ and Sharma & Sohani (2022) models the leagile enablers of SCM Indian automobile sector, although they believe that this alone is insufficient. Meena et al. (2022) measure supplier performance and selection. Yu et al. (2022) attempt to establish that improving supplier capability through training, could be very effective for the overall performance of the company, obtaining research evidence from the Chinese Automobile Industry.
At present, challenges in the Indian automobile sector include inventory optimisation, warehousing, transport and distribution; reduce damages during transit and delivery, and achieve real-time visibility and information sharing across stakeholders. Logistics management practices may ameliorate this. J. Singh, Singh, & Kumari (2022) assess various technologies and models on SCM performance in India’s automobile industry.

Conceptual Framework

The literature review brings out that researchers identified various research gaps and scope for future research in SSCM practices. Mostly, the research on SSCM has been carried out in China, SE Asian countries like Taiwan, South Korea, Malaysia, and some Middle Eastern/ African countries like Jordan, Kenya and Iran. Limited studies exist in India on green SCM pertaining to automotive and other manufacturing industries. Another common trend seen through literature reviews is that studies take into account a number of different types of industries and generalize findings which may not hold good for a specific industry, since operations in different industries vary in nature and are not comparable. Resultantly, studies have not supported many important hypotheses. Researchers themselves have recommended that research be carried out for a specific industry for consistent results and extend further longitudinal research for future.
Some research gaps identified based on research in the past decade are:
  • Need for study specific to EVs in India rather than generic to the automobile sector or industry.
  • Need for study specific to E2W in India.
  • Need for specific topics of research to consider developing country like India.
  • Need to incorporate and integrate social issues in SSCM performance.
  • Need to further research on vendors/ suppliers’ partnership or collaboration on sustainable supply chain performance.
  • Need to focus investigation of SSCM performance to a particular type of industry to have consistency in results, which in this case would be the EV sector in India and specifically E2W sector.
A tentative conceptual framework is given in Figure 1. This framework shows how vendor collaboration and partnerships can impact industries positively with regard to economic, environment and social aspects.
Under Vendor Partnerships, the aspects of Vendor Collaboration, Vendor Selection, Partnership Management, VMI, Outsourcing, Innovation etc can be studied using various independent variables like top management commitment, quality of vendor, information-sharing between the company and its vendors etc.
On the dependent variables’ perspective, performance and competitiveness (Profitability, Innovation, Flexibility, Customer Delight, Quality) and environmental/ social aspects (Pollution Control including Waste Management and Social Impact) can be studied.
Research on the above lines will have the following outcome:
  • Assessment of critical factors of suppliers’ partnership influencing industry’s performance.
  • Evolve suitable sustainable supply chain practices to tap significant opportunities expected in the EV/ E2W industry in future.
  • Assessment of GoI support for E2W industry. Influence of State Government’s policies on development of ecosystem, especially for undertaking E2W manufacture.
  • A framework for further research on investigation of other variables like technology, human resources, investment, operations, vis-à-vis industries’ performance.
  • Creating awareness among the E2W industry on the opportunities existing and also solutions for the supply chain challenges related to E2W work packages.
  • Academic institutions collaboration for E2W research and development activities.
  • The current study is expected to help practitioners of not only E2W industry but also other manufacturing industries for overcoming supply chain challenges.

Future Research and Conclusions

Some of the topics for further analysis and study are:
  • For a balanced view, rather than take only a positive view of EVs, future research can also explore negative impact of EVs on society, environment, industry, supply chain etc. One example is on how the existing ICE vehicles would be disposed, creating a logistics nightmare.
  • EV industries taking on less ambitious ventures initially and moving up the value ladder when they gain experience and market share, could be the topic of research.
  • Explore geopolitical aspects of EV proliferation and connected challenges, especially with regard to lithium, a basic raw material for EV batteries, will have an important bearing on logistics and supply chain.
  • Research could also explore alternate elements which may power future batteries where countries like India could be more self-sufficient in. E.g., research is in progress to identify materials like sodium, which may mitigate geopolitical issues.
  • Research could deal with the disposal of batteries which is a sustainability nightmare.
  • More in-depth analysis of the social impacts of EV industries could be studied.
  • The difference between the supply chain of automobile ICE industries and EV industry could be a rich field for study.
  • Supply chain involved in the eventual and perhaps inevitable re-purposing of ICE automobile factories into EV production lines, and the consequent evolving of vendors for this change, could be studied.
  • The supply chain and logistics aspects that determine the choice of location for setting up an EV plant, can be studied. This has relevance even as states have become competitive in attracting industries for job creation.
  • Research could question whether EVs are the final frontier in propulsion or other technologies like hydrogen or solar powered vehicles could rule in the future. This has an important bearing on the supply chain and vendor base.

Summary

Environmental concerns have led to the flurry of manufacturing activity pertaining to EVs and India is at the forefront of an EV revolution, of which E2W is a major component. In India, in the foreseeable future 2W and hence E2W will not fall in popularity or sales. GoI has a significant role in encouraging and incentivizing the industries dealing with the manufacture of EVs. The manufacturers also need to take steps to increase efficiency and profitability through the adoption of proper SCM and SSCM measures, without compromising upon the social aspects. The success of Indian manufacturing will largely depend on the potential of the E2W industry to exploit state-of-the-art in sustainability and green manufacturing.
EV technology in itself may not be the final frontier in mankind’s search for newer propulsion systems. The world is already looking at hydrogen powered vehicles, vehicles running on fuel cells, solar power etc. However, all of these technologies have their own set of problems which will undoubtedly be solved in the future. Hydrogen production as yet is also not green, and it is understood that green hydrogen requires focus (Venkatasatish & Dhanamjayulu, 2022). Also, storage and transport of hydrogen is a big problem due to its low density, and flammability (Guo et al., 2022). While these issues are being resolved, EVs will be the go-to technology for automobiles till 2040-50 at least.
***

References

  1. Abhyankar, N.; Mohanty, P.; Deorah, S.; Karali, N.; Paliwal, U.; Kersey, J.; Phadke, A. India’s path towards energy independence and a clean future: Harnessing india’s renewable edge for cost-effective energy independence by 2047. Electr. J. 2023, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Agarwal, S.; Saxena, K.K.; Agrawal, V.; Dixit, J.K.; Prakash, C.; Buddhi, D.; Mohammed, K.A. Prioritizing the barriers of green smart manufacturing using AHP in implementing Industry 4.0: a case from Indian automotive industry. TQM J. 2022, 36, 71–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Badri Ahmadi, H.; Kusi-Sarpong, S.; Rezaei, J. Assessing the social sustainability of supply chains using Best Worst Method. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2017, 126, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Anand, A., Sagar, S. R., & Kumar, C. (2023). How India Is Able to Control Inflation During the Russia-Ukraine War. In Cases on the Resurgence of Emerging Businesses (pp. 237–251). IGI Global. [CrossRef]
  5. ANI. (2023, January 9). India tops Japan to become world’s 3rd largest auto market. Fortune India.
  6. Asokan, V.A.; Teah, H.Y.; Kawazu, E.; Hotta, Y. Ambitious EV policy expedites the e-waste and socio-environmental impacts in India. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2023, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. A. V., K.; Bashir, S.; Ramesh, S.; Ramesh, K. Solar cell-integrated energy storage devices for electric vehicles: a breakthrough in the green renewable energy. Ionics 2022, 28, 4065–4081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Balakrishnan, A.; Suresh, J. Green supply chain management in Indian automotive sector. Int. J. Logist. Syst. Manag. 2018, 29, 502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Barman, P.; Dutta, L.; Azzopardi, B. Electric Vehicle Battery Supply Chain and Critical Materials: A Brief Survey of State of the Art. Energies 2023, 16, 3369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Beheshti, H.M.; Clelland, I.J.; Harrington, K.V. Competitive Advantage with Vendor Managed Inventory. J. Promot. Manag. 2020, 26, 836–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bhattacharya, S. Supply Chain Management in Indian Automotive Industry : Complexities, Challenges and Way Ahead. Int. J. Manag. Value Supply Chains 2014, 5, 49–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bhattacharyya, D.; Pradhan, S. ; Shabbiruddin Barriers in Replacement of Conventional Vehicles by Electric Vehicles in India. Int. J. Decis. Support Syst. Technol. 2023, 15, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cao, M.; Zhang, Q. Supply chain collaboration: Impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance. J. Oper. Manag. 2011, 29, 163–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Carter, C.R.; Rogers, D.S. A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2008, 38, 360–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chawla, U.; Mohnot, R.; Mishra, V.; Singh, H.V.; Singh, A.K. Factors Influencing Customer Preference and Adoption of Electric Vehicles in India: A Journey towards More Sustainable Transportation. Sustainability 2023, 15, 7020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, L.; Zhao, X.; Tang, O.; Price, L.; Zhang, S.; Zhu, W. Supply chain collaboration for sustainability: A literature review and future research agenda. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2017, 194, 73–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chikán, A.; Czakó, E.; Kiss-Dobronyi, B.; Losonci, D. Firm competitiveness: A general model and a manufacturing application. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2022, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chopra, S. , & Meindl, P. (2016). Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation (Sixth Glob). Pearson Education Ltd.
  19. Cornet, A. , Conzade, J., Schaufuss, P., Schenk, S., Tschiesner, A., Laufenberg, K. von, Hensley, R., Hertzke, P., Heuss, R., & Moller, T. (2021). Why the automotive future is electric.
  20. Dang, T.-T.; Nguyen, N.-A.; Nguyen, V.-T.; Dang, L.-T. A Two-Stage Multi-Criteria Supplier Selection Model for Sustainable Automotive Supply Chain under Uncertainty. Axioms 2022, 11, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Das, D. Development and validation of a scale for measuring Sustainable Supply Chain Management practices and performance. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 164, 1344–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Das, D. Sustainable supply chain management in Indian organisations: an empirical investigation. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2017, 56, 5776–5794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Das, P.K.; Bhat, M.Y. Global electric vehicle adoption: implementation and policy implications for India. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 40612–40622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. De Brito, M.P.; Van der Laan, E.A. Supply Chain Management and Sustainability: Procrastinating Integration in Mainstream Research. Sustainability 2010, 2, 859–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dhaked, D.K.; Birla, D. Microgrid Designing for Electrical Two-Wheeler Charging Station Supported by Solar PV and Fuel Cell. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 2021, 14, 2517–2525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dhawan, R. , Gupta, S., Hensley, R., Huddar, N., Iyer, B., & Mangaleswaran, R. (2017). The future of mobility in India: Challenges & opportunities for the auto component industry.
  27. Digalwar, A.K.; Rastogi, A. Assessments of social factors responsible for adoption of electric vehicles in India: a case study. Int. J. Energy Sect. Manag. 2022, 17, 251–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Digalwar, A.K.; Thomas, R.G.; Rastogi, A. Evaluation of Factors for Sustainable Manufacturing of Electric Vehicles in India. Procedia CIRP 2021, 98, 505–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dixit, S.K.; Singh, A.K. Predicting Electric Vehicle (EV) Buyers in India: A Machine Learning Approach. Rev. Socionetwork Strat. 2022, 16, 221–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Dixon, J.; Andersen, P.B.; Bell, K.; Traeholt, C. On the ease of being green: An investigation of the inconvenience of electric vehicle charging. Appl. Energy 2020, 258, 114090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dutt, D. Exploring multi-level interactions in electric vehicle niche evolution in India. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 2023, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Eftekhari, A.; Kim, D.-W. Sodium-ion batteries: New opportunities beyond energy storage by lithium. J. Power Sources 2018, 395, 336–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fauzdar, C.; Gupta, N.; Goswami, M.; Kumar, R. MICMAC Analysis of Industry 4.0 in Indian Automobile Industry. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 2022, 81, 873–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Fritz, M. M. C. (2019). Sustainable Supply Chain Management (pp. 1–14). [CrossRef]
  35. Gamini, L.; Rajapaksa, P. Impact of Supply Chain Management Practices on Competitive Advantage and Organization Performance: Evidence from the Manufacturing Industry in Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka J. Manag. Stud. 2020, 2, 137–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sheorey, P.; Gandhi, A. Antecedents of green consumer behaviour: a study of consumers in a developing country like India. Int. J. Public Sect. Perform. Manag. 2019, 5, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gautam, A.; Akhtar, A.; Shah, M.; Soni, U. Carving strategic resilience roadmap for Indian automotive industry using hybrid analytical approach. Int. J. Bus. Contin. Risk Manag. 2023, 13, 115–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gedam, V.V.; Raut, R.D.; Jabbour, A.B.L.d.S.; Narkhede, B.E.; Grebinevych, O. Sustainable manufacturing and green human resources: Critical success factors in the automotive sector. Bus. Strat. Environ. 2021, 30, 1296–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Geng, R.; Mansouri, S.A.; Aktas, E. The relationship between green supply chain management and performance: A meta-analysis of empirical evidences in Asian emerging economies. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2016, 183, 245–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ghadge, A.; Mogale, D.; Bourlakis, M.; Maiyar, L.M.; Moradlou, H. Link between Industry 4.0 and green supply chain management: Evidence from the automotive industry. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2022, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ghosh, S.; Mandal, M.C.; Ray, A. Strategic sourcing model for green supply chain management: an insight into automobile manufacturing units in India. Benchmarking: Int. J. 2021, 29, 3097–3132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gong, R.; Xue, J.; Zhao, L.; Zolotova, O.; Ji, X.; Xu, Y. A Bibliometric Analysis of Green Supply Chain Management Based on the Web of Science (WOS) Platform. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gopal, P.; Thakkar, J. Sustainable supply chain practices: an empirical investigation on Indian automobile industry. Prod. Plan. Control 2016, 27, 49–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gulzari, A.; Wang, Y.; Prybutok, V. A green experience with eco-friendly cars: A young consumer electric vehicle rental behavioral model. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 65, 102877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Guo, Q.; Zhou, H.; Lin, W.; Nojavan, S. RETRACTED: Risk-based design of hydrogen storage-based charging station for hydrogen and electric vehicles using downside risk constraint approach. J. Energy Storage 2022, 48, 103973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gupta, D.; Garg, A. Sustainable development and carbon neutrality: Integrated assessment of transport transitions in India. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 2020, 85, 102474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Han, H. (2023). Analysis of India’s New and Renewable Energy Market and Policies and Implications for Korea-India Cooperation. SSRN Electronic Journal. [CrossRef]
  48. Hema, R.; Venkatarangan, M. Adoption of EV: Landscape of EV and opportunities for India. Meas. Sensors 2022, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Holden, E.; Linnerud, K.; Banister, D. Sustainable development: Our Common Future revisited. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2014, 26, 130–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hong, J.; Zhang, Y.; Ding, M. Sustainable supply chain management practices, supply chain dynamic capabilities, and enterprise performance. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 172, 3508–3519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hossain, M.D.S.; Fang, Y.R.; Ma, T.; Huang, C.; Dai, H. The role of electric vehicles in decarbonizing India?s road passenger toward carbon neutrality and clean air: A state-level analysis. Energy 2023, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hossain, M.S.; Fang, Y.R.; Ma, T.; Huang, C.; Peng, W.; Urpelainen, J.; Hebbale, C.; Dai, H. Narrowing fossil fuel consumption in the Indian road transport sector towards reaching carbon neutrality. Energy Policy 2023, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hsieh, I.-Y.L.; Chossière, G.P.; Gençer, E.; Chen, H.; Barrett, S.; Green, W.H. An Integrated Assessment of Emissions, Air Quality, and Public Health Impacts of China’s Transition to Electric Vehicles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 6836–6846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hudnurkar, M.; Jakhar, S.; Rathod, U. Factors Affecting Collaboration in Supply Chain: A Literature Review. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014, 133, 189–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hui, Z.; He-Cheng, W.; Min-Fei, Z. Partnership Management, Supply Chain Collaboration, and Firm Innovation Performance: An Empirical Examination. Int. J. Innov. Sci. 2015, 7, 127–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. IPCC. (2018). Summary for Policymakers.
  57. Jacob, C. (2023, January 9). India is learning to love electric vehicles — but they’re not cars. Cnbc.Com.
  58. Jain, V.; Sangaiah, A.K.; Sakhuja, S.; Thoduka, N.; Aggarwal, R. Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS: a case study in the Indian automotive industry. Neural Comput. Appl. 2018, 29, 555–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Jamwal, A. , Patidar, A., Agrawal, R., Sharma, M., & Manupati, V. K. (2022). Analysis of Barriers in Sustainable Supply Chain Management for Indian Automobile Industries (pp. 79–89). [CrossRef]
  60. Javanmardi, E.; Hoque, M.; Tauheed, A.; Umar, M. Evaluating the Factors Affecting Electric Vehicles Adoption Considering the Sustainable Development Level. World Electr. Veh. J. 2023, 14, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Jermsittiparsert, K. , & Rungsrisawa, S. (2019). Impact Strategic Sourcing, Supplier Innovativeness, and Information Sharing on Supply Chain Agility. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 5(2).
  62. Jones, B.; Nguyen-Tien, V.V.; Elliott, R.J.R. The electric vehicle revolution: Critical material supply chains, trade and development. World Econ. 2023, 46, 2–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Juned, M.; Farooquie, J.A. VMI adoption in automotive industries: two different perspectives. Int. J. Serv. Oper. Manag. 2022, 43, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. K. Indu, & M. Aswatha Kumar. (2022). Electric Vehicle Research: Need, Opportunities, and Challenges. In Handbook of Sustainable Development Through Green Engineering and Technology (1st ed.). Imprint CRC Press.
  65. K, R.; P, N. Automobile manufacturing in India by 2050 – War on EV. Mater. Today: Proc. [CrossRef]
  66. Kähkönen, A.-K.; Lintukangas, K.; Ritala, P.; Hallikas, J. Supplier collaboration practices: implications for focal firm innovation performance. Eur. Bus. Rev. 2017, 29, 402–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kapustin, N.O.; Grushevenko, D.A. Long-term electric vehicles outlook and their potential impact on electric grid. Energy Policy 2020, 137, 111103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kesari, J.P.; Sharma, Y.; Goel, C. Opportunities and Scope for Electric Vehicles in India. Int. J. Mech. Eng. 2019, 6, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Khan, M.; Hussain, M.; Saber, H.M. Information sharing in a sustainable supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2016, 181, 208–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Khande, M. S. , Patil, A. S., Andhale, G. C., & Shirsat, R. S. (2020). Design and Development of Electric Scooter. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 7(5).
  71. Khot, S.B.; Thiagarajan, S. Resilience and sustainability of supply chain management in the Indian automobile industry. Int. J. Data Netw. Sci. 2019, 339–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Khurana, A.; Kumar, V.V.R.; Sidhpuria, M. A Study on the Adoption of Electric Vehicles in India: The Mediating Role of Attitude. Vision: J. Bus. Perspect. 2020, 24, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Koberg, E.; Longoni, A. A systematic review of sustainable supply chain management in global supply chains. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 207, 1084–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kumar, R.; Bangwal, D. An assessment of sustainable supply chain initiatives in Indian automobile industry using PPS method. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2022, 25, 9703–9729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kumar, R.; Jha, A.; Damodaran, A.; Bangwal, D.; Dwivedi, A. Addressing the challenges to electric vehicle adoption via sharing economy: an Indian perspective. Manag. Environ. Qual. Int. J. 2020, 32, 82–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Goudar, S. P.; Shah, S. S.; Shirali, G. S. Echocardiography of Coarctation of the Aorta, Aortic Arch Hypoplasia, and Arch Interruption: Strategies for Evaluation of the Aortic Arch. Cardiol Young 2016, 26(8), 1553–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Singh, R.K.; Modgil, S. Assessment of Lean Supply Chain Practices in Indian Automotive Industry. Glob. Bus. Rev. 2020, 24, 68–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kuzma, E.; Padilha, L.S.; Sehnem, S.; Julkovski, D.J.; Roman, D.J. The relationship between innovation and sustainability: A meta-analytic study. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 259, 120745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Lee, R. The Effect of Supply Chain Management Strategy on Operational and Financial Performance. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Li, Y.; Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. The economic feasibility of green hydrogen and fuel cell electric vehicles for road transport in China. Energy Policy 2021, 160, 112703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Liao, S.-H.; Hu, D.-C.; Shih, Y.-S. Supply chain collaboration and innovation capability: the moderated mediating role of quality management. Total. Qual. Manag. Bus. Excel. 2021, 32, 298–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Liu, Y.; Srai, J.S.; Evans, S. Environmental management: the role of supply chain capabilities in the auto sector. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2016, 21, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Luthra, S.; Garg, D.; Haleem, A. Empirical Analysis of Green Supply Chain Management Practices in Indian Automobile Industry. J. Inst. Eng. (India): Ser. C 2014, 95, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Luthra, S. , Garg, D., & Haleem, A. (2015). Critical success factors of green supply chain management for achieving sustainability in Indian automobile industry. Production Planning & Control, 26(5), 339–362. [CrossRef]
  85. Luthra, S.; Garg, D.; Haleem, A. The impacts of critical success factors for implementing green supply chain management towards sustainability: an empirical investigation of Indian automobile industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 121, 142–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Luthra, S.; Haleem, A. Hurdles in Implementing Sustainable Supply Chain Management: An Analysis of Indian Automobile Sector. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 189, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Luthra, S.; Qadri, M.A.; Garg, D.; Haleem, A. Identification of critical success factors to achieve high green supply chain management performances in Indian automobile industry. Int. J. Logist. Syst. Manag. 2014, 18, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Mahajan, B. , Singh, M., & Pai, Dr. S. (2023). Mapping the Evolution of Parliamentary Conversations on Air Pollution: A Focus on India’s National Clean Air Program and Electric Vehicles (3).
  89. Makeen, P.; Memon, S.; Elkasrawy, M.A.; Abdullatif, S.O.; Ghali, H.A. Smart green charging scheme of centralized electric vehicle stations. Int. J. Green Energy 2021, 19, 490–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Mani, V.; Jabbour, C.J.C.; Mani, K.T.N. Supply chain social sustainability in small and medium manufacturing enterprises and firms' performance: Empirical evidence from an emerging Asian economy. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2020, 227, 107656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Manivannan, B.; Kathirvelu, P.; Balasubramanian, R. A review on wireless charging methods – The prospects for future charging of EV. Renew. Energy Focus 2023, 46, 68–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Mathivathanan, D.; Agarwal, V.; Mathiyazhagan, K.; Saikouk, T.; Appolloni, A. Modeling the pressures for sustainability adoption in the Indian automotive context. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 342, 130972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Mathivathanan, D.; Kannan, D.; Haq, A.N. Sustainable supply chain management practices in Indian automotive industry: A multi-stakeholder view. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 128, 284–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Meena, P.L.; Katiyar, R.; Kumar, G. Supplier performance and selection from sustainable supply chain performance perspective. Int. J. Prod. Perform. Manag. 2022, 72, 2420–2445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Mehdikhani, R.; Valmohammadi, C. Strategic collaboration and sustainable supply chain management. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 2019, 32, 778–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Mishra, R.; Singh, R.K.; Rana, N.P. Developing environmental collaboration among supply chain partners for sustainable consumption & production: Insights from an auto sector supply chain. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 338, 130619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Mishra, S.; Verma, S.; Chowdhury, S.; Gaur, A.; Mohapatra, S.; Dwivedi, G.; Verma, P. A Comprehensive Review on Developments in Electric Vehicle Charging Station Infrastructure and Present Scenario of India. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Mordor Intelligence. (2023). India Electric Vehicle Market - Size, Share, COVID-19 Impact & Forecasts up to 2028.
  99. Naim, A. , Muniasamy, A., Clementking, A., & Rajkumar, R. (2022). Relevance of Green Manufacturing and IoT in Industrial Transformation and Marketing Management (pp. 395–419). [CrossRef]
  100. Najjar, M.; Small, M.H.; Yasin, M.M. Social Sustainability Strategy across the Supply Chain: A Conceptual Approach from the Organisational Perspective. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Nayak, A.K.; Ganguli, B.; Ajayan, P.M. Advances in electric two-wheeler technologies. Energy Rep. 2023, 9, 3508–3530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Nygaard, A. The Geopolitical Risk and Strategic Uncertainty of Green Growth after the Ukraine Invasion: How the Circular Economy Can Decrease the Market Power of and Resource Dependency on Critical Minerals. Circ. Econ. Sustain. 2022, 3, 1099–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Ourici, A. Battery Technologies Comparison for Electric Vehicles. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 2023, 16, 1461–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Kwateng, K.O.; Fokuoh, B.; Tetteh, F.K. The relationship between vendor managed inventory and operational performance. Mod. Supply Chain Res. Appl. 2022, 4, 202–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Paladugula, A.L.; Kholod, N.; Chaturvedi, V.; Ghosh, P.P.; Pal, S.; Clarke, L.; Evans, M.; Kyle, P.; Koti, P.N.; Parikh, K.; et al. A multi-model assessment of energy and emissions for India's transportation sector through 2050. Energy Policy 2018, 116, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Panigrahi, S.S.; Bahinipati, B.; Jain, V. Sustainable supply chain management. Manag. Environ. Qual. Int. J. 2019, 30, 1001–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Pathak, S.K.; Karwasra, K.; Sharma, V.; Sharma, V. Analysis of Barriers to Green Manufacturing Using Hybrid Approach: An Investigatory Case Study on Indian Automotive Industry. Process. Integr. Optim. Sustain. 2021, 5, 545–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Patyal, V.S.; Kumar, R.; Kushwah, S. Modeling barriers to the adoption of electric vehicles: An Indian perspective. Energy 2021, 237, 121554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Penn, I. , & Lipton, E. (2021, ). The Lithium Gold Rush: Inside the Race to Power Electric Vehicles. The New York Times. 6 May.
  110. Phadke, M. , & Nalam, H. (2021). The Indian Two-Wheeler Market Charges to Sustainability. Kline Energy.
  111. Prajeesh, C.B.; Pillai, A.S. Indian smart mobility ecosystem – Key visions and missions. INNOVATIONS IN COMPUTATIONAL AND COMPUTER TECHNIQUES: ICACCT-2021. LOCATION OF CONFERENCE, IndiaDATE OF CONFERENCE; p. 050005.
  112. Radzuan, K. , Omar, M. F., Nawi, M. N. M., Rahim, M. K. I. A., & Yaakob, M. (2018). Vendor Managed Inventory Practices: A case in Manufacturing Companies. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 7(4), 196–201.
  113. Ramanathan, U.; Gunasekaran, A. Supply chain collaboration: Impact of success in long-term partnerships. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2013, 147, 252–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Ramji, A. , Fulton, L., & Chandra, Mi. (2023, ). India-led electric two-wheeler transitions in the global South. 36th International Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exhibition (EVS36). 11 June.
  115. Ritchie, H. (2020, ). Cars, planes, trains: where do CO2 emissions from transport come from? Our World in Data. 6 October.
  116. India two Wheelers Go Electric-Setting Stage for the E-Revolution. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng. 2019, 8, 751–756. [CrossRef]
  117. Sahu, A.K.; Sharma, M.; Raut, R.D.; Sahu, A.K.; Sahu, N.K.; Antony, J.; Tortorella, G.L. Decision-making framework for supplier selection using an integrated MCDM approach in a lean-agile-resilient-green environment: evidence from Indian automotive sector. TQM J. 2022, 35, 964–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Sánchez-Flores, R.B.; Cruz-Sotelo, S.E.; Ojeda-Benitez, S.; Ramírez-Barreto, M.E. Sustainable Supply Chain Management—A Literature Review on Emerging Economies. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Satya Sai Surya Varun, D. , Halder, T., Basak, A., & Chakravarty, D. (2023). A Brief Review of Current Smart Electric Mobility Facilities and Their Future Scope (pp. 541–566). [CrossRef]
  120. Saw, K.; Kedia, A. Estimating the adoption of electric vehicles: A case study of four Indian states. Competition Regul. Netw. Ind. 2023, 24, 120–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Sayed, M.; Hendry, L.C.; Bell, M.Z. Sustainable procurement: comparing in-house and outsourcing implementation modes. Prod. Plan. Control. 2021, 32, 145–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Seuring, S.; Müller, M. From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. J. Clean. Prod. 2008, 16, 1699–1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Sezen, B.; Çankaya, S.Y. Effects of Green Manufacturing and Eco-innovation on Sustainability Performance. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 2013, 99, 154–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. A FUNDAMENTAL ANALYSIS OF SELECTED BATTERY COMPANIES IN INDIA. Int. Res. J. Mod. Eng. Technol. Sci. 2023. [CrossRef]
  125. Sharma, H.; Sohani, N. Modelling the leagile enablers of supply chain management in Indian automobile sector. Int. J. Soc. Syst. Sci. 2022, 14, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Shin, N.; Park, S.H.; Park, S. Partnership-Based Supply Chain Collaboration: Impact on Commitment, Innovation, and Firm Performance. Sustainability 2019, 11, 449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Shrimali, G. Getting to India's electric vehicle targets cost-effectively: To subsidize or not, and how? Energy Policy 2021, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Shu, T.; Papageorgiou, D.J.; Harper, M.R.; Rajagopalan, S.; Rudnick, I.; Botterud, A. From coal to variable renewables: Impact of flexible electric vehicle charging on the future Indian electricity sector. Energy 2023, 269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Shyam, H.S.; Shuaib, I.; Pandey, S.P. Exploring the Supply Chain Challenges in the Area of Lithium-Ion Batteries Used in Electric Vehicles. Macromol. Symp. 2023, 407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. SIAM. (2022). Automobile Domestic Sales Trends. Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers (SIAM). https://www.siam.in/statistics.aspx?
  131. Singh, J.; Hamid, A.B.A.; Garza-Reyes, J.A. Supply chain resilience strategies and their impact on sustainability: an investigation from the automobile sector. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2023, 28, 787–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Singh, J. , Singh, C. deep, & Deepak, D. (2022). Green Manufacturing a Modern Era for Indian Manufacturing Industries: A Review (pp. 103–107). [CrossRef]
  133. Singh, J.; Singh, S.; Kumari, M. Impact assessment of logistics management practices on supply chain management performance in the automobile industry in India. Int. J. Logist. Econ. Glob. 2022, 9, 319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Singh, P. L. , Sindhwani, R., Sharma, B. P., Srivastava, P., Rajpoot, P., Lalit, Rahul, & Kumar, R. (2022). Analyse the Critical Success Factor of Green Manufacturing for Achieving Sustainability in Automotive Sector (pp. 79–94). [CrossRef]
  135. Singh, V.; Singh, V.; Vaibhav, S. Analysis of electric vehicle trends, development and policies in India. Case Stud. Transp. Policy 2021, 9, 1180–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Soares, L.O.; Reis, A.d.C.; Vieira, P.S.; Hernández-Callejo, L.; Boloy, R.A.M. Electric Vehicle Supply Chain Management: A Bibliometric and Systematic Review. Energies 2023, 16, 1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Soman, A. , Ganesan, K., & Kaur, H. (2019). India’s Electric Vehicle Transition Impact on Auto Industry and Building the EV Ecosystem.
  138. Sonar, H.; Mukherjee, A.; Gunasekaran, A.; Singh, R.K. Sustainable supply chain management of automotive sector in context to the circular economy: A strategic framework. Bus. Strat. Environ. 2022, 31, 3635–3648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Soosay, C.A.; Hyland, P. A decade of supply chain collaboration and directions for future research. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2015, 20, 613–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Soosay, C.A.; Hyland, P.W.; Ferrer, M. Supply chain collaboration: capabilities for continuous innovation. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2008, 13, 160–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Sopadang, A. , Wichaisri, S., & Banomyong, R. (2017, ). Sustainable Supply Chain Performance Measurement A Case Study of the Sugar Industry. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. 11 April.
  142. Sripad, S.; Mehta, T.; Srivastava, A.; Viswanathan, V. The Future of Vehicle Electrification in India May Ride on Two Wheels. ACS Energy Lett. 2019, 4, 2691–2694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Srivastava, A.; Kumar, R.R.; Chakraborty, A.; Mateen, A.; Narayanamurthy, G. Design and selection of government policies for electric vehicles adoption: A global perspective. Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 2022, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Sytch, M.; Kim, Y.; Page, S. Supplier-Selection Practices for Robust Global Supply Chain Networks: A Simulation Of The Global Auto Industry. Calif. Manag. Rev. 2022, 64, 119–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Tarei, P.K.; Chand, P.; Gupta, H. Barriers to the adoption of electric vehicles: Evidence from India. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 291, 125847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Umar, M.; Khan, S.A.R.; Zia-Ul-Haq, H.M.; Yusliza, M.Y.; Farooq, K. The role of emerging technologies in implementing green practices to achieve sustainable operations. TQM J. 2021, 34, 232–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Varshney, K.; Varshney, P.K.; Gautam, K.; Tanwar, M.; Chaudhary, M. Current trends and future perspectives in the recycling of spent lead acid batteries in India. Mater. Today: Proc. 2020, 26, 592–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Venkatasatish, R.; Dhanamjayulu, C. Reinforcement learning based energy management systems and hydrogen refuelling stations for fuel cell electric vehicles: An overview. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 27646–27670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Vidhi, R.; Shrivastava, P. A Review of Electric Vehicle Lifecycle Emissions and Policy Recommendations to Increase EV Penetration in India. Energies 2018, 11, 483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Virmani, N.; Agarwal, V.; Karuppiah, K.; Agarwal, S.; Raut, R.D.; Paul, S.K. Mitigating barriers to adopting electric vehicles in an emerging economy context. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Wang, J.; Dai, J. Sustainable supply chain management practices and performance. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2018, 118, 2–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Winter, M.; Knemeyer, A.M. Exploring the integration of sustainability and supply chain management. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2013, 43, 18–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Wong, C.Y.; Wong, C.W.; Boon-Itt, S. Integrating environmental management into supply chains. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2015, 45, 43–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Yang, Z.; Hu, X.; Sun, J.; Lei, Q.; Zhang, Y. Is it worth promoting battery swapping? A social welfare perspective on provider- and consumer-side incentives. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 330, 117157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Cankaya, S.Y.; Sezen, B. Effects of green supply chain management practices on sustainability performance. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2019, 30, 98–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Yu, V.F.; Qiu, M.; Gupta, J.N. Improving supplier capability through training: Evidence from the Chinese Automobile Industry. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2022, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Zhang, M.; Pawar, K.S.; Bhardwaj, S. Improving supply chain social responsibility through supplier development. Prod. Plan. Control. 2017, 28, 500–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Preprints 106751 g001
Figure 1. Conceptual Framework.
Figure 1. Conceptual Framework.
Preprints 106751 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
bsky
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated