Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Comparative Study of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Bidirectional LSTM, and Traditional Machine Learning Approaches for Energy Consumption Prediction

Version 1 : Received: 14 May 2024 / Approved: 15 May 2024 / Online: 15 May 2024 (10:49:00 CEST)

How to cite: Alizadegan, H.; Radmehr, A.; Karimi, H.; Asghari Ilani, M. Comparative Study of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Bidirectional LSTM, and Traditional Machine Learning Approaches for Energy Consumption Prediction. Preprints 2024, 2024051020. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202405.1020.v1 Alizadegan, H.; Radmehr, A.; Karimi, H.; Asghari Ilani, M. Comparative Study of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Bidirectional LSTM, and Traditional Machine Learning Approaches for Energy Consumption Prediction. Preprints 2024, 2024051020. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202405.1020.v1

Abstract

Responsible, efficient, and environmentally conscious energy consumption practices are increasingly essential for ensuring the reliability of the modern electricity grid. This study focuses on leveraging time series analysis to improve forecasting accuracy, crucial for various application domains where real-world time series data often exhibit complex, non-linear patterns. Our approach advocates for utilizing Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) and Bidirectional LSTM (BiLSTM) models for precise time series forecasting. To ensure a fair evaluation, we compare the performance of our proposed approach with traditional neural networks, time-series forecasting methods, and conventional decline curves. Additionally, individual models based on LSTM, Bi-LSTM, and other machine learning methods are implemented for a comprehensive assessment. Experimental results consistently demonstrate that our proposed model outperforms all benchmarking methods in terms of mean absolute error (MAE) across most datasets. Addressing the imbalance between activations by consumer and prosumer groups, our predictions show superior performance compared to several traditional forecasting methods, such as the Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average model (ARIMA) and Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average model (SARIMA). Specifically, the root mean square error (RMSE) of Bi-LSTM is 5.35%, 46.08%, and 50.6% lower than LSTM, ARIMA, and SARIMA, respectively, on the May test data.

Keywords

Time series forecasting; LSTM; Bi-LSTM; Deep learning; ARIMA; SARIMA; Energy

Subject

Computer Science and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.