Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

Climate Effects on Ergot and Ergot Alkaloids Occurrence in Italian Wheat

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Submitted:

06 May 2024

Posted:

08 May 2024

You are already at the latest version

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Abstract
In recent years, there has been an intensification of weather variability worldwide as a result of climate change. Some regions have been affected by drought, while others have experienced more intense rainfall. The incidence and severity of mouldy grain and mycotoxin contamination during the growing and harvesting seasons have increased as a result of these weather conditions. Addi-tionally, torrential rains and wet conditions may cause delays in grain drying, leading to mold growth in the field. In July 2023, a wheat field in Lecco (Lombardy, Italy) was affected by torren-tial rains that led to the development of the Claviceps fungi. In the field, dark sclerotia were identi-fied on some ears. Wheat ears, kernels and sclerotia were collected and analyzed by LC-MS/MS at IZSLER, Food Chemical Department, in Bologna. The wheat ears, kernels and sclerotia were ana-lyzed for 12 ergot alkaloids (EAs) according to (EU) Regulation 2023/915 (er-gocornine/ergocorninine; ergocristine/ergocristinine; ergocryptine/ergocryptinine; ergome-trine/ergometrinine; ergosine/ergosinine; ergotamine/ergotaminine), after QuEChERS (Z-Sep/C18) purification. The analyzed sclerotia showed significant differences in total alkaloids content that varies between 0.01-0.5% (w/w), according to the results of 2017 EFSA scientific report. EAs de-tected in sclerotia were up to 4951 mg/kg, in wheat ears up to 33 mg/kg, and in kernels were 1 mg/kg. Additional mycotoxins including ochratoxin A, deoxynivalenol, zearalenone, fumonisins, T2-HT2 toxins, and aflatoxins were investigated in wheat kernels, after purification with immu-noaffinity columns (IAC). The analysis revealed the presence of deoxynivalenol in wheat kernels at a concentration of 2251 µg/kg. It is expected that climate change will increase the frequency of extreme weather events. In order to mitigate the potential risks associated with mycotox-in-producing fungi and to ensure the protection of human health, it is suggested to implement of-ficial controls in the field.
Keywords: 
ergot alkaloids
;  
sclerotia
;  
climate change
;  
durum wheat
;  
mycotoxins
Subject: 
Chemistry and Materials Science  -   Food Chemistry

supplementary.docx (388.04KB )

1. Introduction

Climate change has significantly contributed to numerous weather and climate extremes events in recent years. Observations have shown changes in extreme events such as heatwaves, heavy rainfall, droughts, and tropical cyclones. The frequency and intensity of these events has increased in most regions of the world since the 1950s, reducing food security due to warming [1]. Agriculture is highly vulnerable to adverse climate events; therefore, climate change is expected to increase uncertainties in providing sufficient and safe food for the growing world population of the 21st century, with major impacts on crop productivity and quality [2]. Mycotoxin contamination is a significant risk due to heavy rains and wet conditions, which could delay grain drying and promote mould growth in fields. One of the most widespread mycotoxigenic species affecting cereals in the European field is Claviceps spp., which produces ergot alkaloids (EAs) [3]. In particular, Claviceps purpurea, parasitizes the seed heads of living plants at the time of flowering and commonly affects cereals such as rye, wheat, triticale, barley, millet and oats [4].
The fungus replaces the grains on cereal ears or seeds, forming visible sclerotia, known as "ergot" from the French word "argot" meaning cock's spur. The typically purple or black sclerotia, fall to the ground before or during harvest and remain intact through winter and grain storage [5,6].
The impact of weather on sclerotial germination and host infection is significant (e.g. summer rainfall). The increasing frequency of weather-related stress may also affect pollen viability, particularly in cereals such as wheat and barley [7].
Claviceps purpurea produces more than 50 different alkaloids. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) report of 2012 identified ergotamine, ergocristine, ergosine, ergocornine, ergocryptine, ergometrine, and their corresponding -inine epimers as the most important alkaloids to monitor [6].
The alkaloids content of a sclerotium varies considerably, ranging from 0.01% to 0.5% (w/w), and alkaloids profile is determined by the fungal strain and host plant in a given geographical region [5].
The EAs are classified as ergopeptines and ergopeptinines, which have different biological and physicochemical properties. These alkaloids have a stereocentre in position C8, which exists in an R- (suffix: -ine) or S- (suffix: -inine) configuration (Figure 1) [6,8,9].
The -inine forms are considered to be biologically inactive, although some of them may rapidly epimerize under certain conditions, such as heating, acidic solvents, or changes in pH. However, epimerization is a reversible process in which the two epimers are in seek of thermodynamic equilibrium [4,10]. On the other hand, the -ine form is considered to be more active in terms of toxicity. Therefore, to avoid underestimation of the total biologically active EA, EFSA suggested that both forms should be quantified [6,11].
Ergotism is the oldest known mycotoxicosis, caused by devastating epidemics in humans resulting from the consumption of food contaminated with EAs [12]. In the middle age, mainly in Central Europe, ergot alkaloid intoxication, or ergotism, was known as St. Anthony's Fire or Holy Fire [5] from ignis sacer, because of the burning sensations in the limbs [13]. The disease appeared in two characteristic forms: convulsive ergotism, characterized by muscular tremors, convulsions, hallucinations, and gangrenous ergotism, with severe vasoconstriction leading to limbs necrosis and autoamputation [14].
Concerns about these mycotoxins led to the setting of new maximum levels. In 2021, the first European Commission Regulation 2021/1399 was implemented, setting maximum levels for sclerotia of Claviceps spp. and for 12 EAs in cereals and derived products for human consumption. This regulation was repealed in 2023 by (EU) Commission Regulation 2023/915 [15,16].
Between 2020 and 2024, there was a significant increase in RASFF (Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed) notifications related to ergot alkaloids contamination in several European countries. Specifically, there were 8 notifications for the presence of sclerotia and 12 for the presence of EAs. The notifications, mainly from Germany, concerned food and feed containing rye [17].
However, ergot alkaloids are increasingly found in other cereals such as triticale, barley, wheat and oats [18], probably due to climate change, as the occurrence of these alkaloids and other mycotoxins in winter cereals is associated with more frequent rainfall and wet soils during critical periods [18,19].
This study examines the case of a wheat field in Lombardy that was lodged by heavy summer rains (Figure 2) and in which Claviceps sclerotia were found.
The wheat ears and kernels, including the sclerotia, were collected and analyzed by LC-MS/MS after QuEChERS (Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe) (Z-Sep/C18) purification. Furthermore, the wheat kernels were analyzed for other mycotoxins (aflatoxins, ochratoxin A, deoxynivalenol, zearalenone, fumonisins and T2-HT2 toxins) by LC-MS/MS after separation and purification with immunoaffinity columns (IAC).

1.1. Case Report

This study examines a case that affected a mountain wheat field in La Valletta Brianza, located in the province of Lecco (Lombardy, Italy) (Figure 3), during the summer of 2023. Lombardy experienced heavy summer rains causing lodging of durum wheat ears in July 2023. The soil was affected by the development of a microclimate with high humidity and low ventilation, which made the wheat more susceptible to infection by Claviceps fungi.
Claviceps purpurea generally infects the host plant during two critical periods: the rainy and the flowering seasons [12]. The fungus germinates during cold weather followed by warm periods (0-18 °C). Within 24 hours, Claviceps spores germinate and infect the host [20,21,22].
Reports from the Regional Agency for Prevention and Environment of Lombardy (ARPA) [23] indicate that the durum wheat flowered in May, that it was a particularly rainy month in Lombardy, while June was characterized by low precipitation and higher temperatures. It requires 4-6 weeks after infection for sclerotia to form and replace the seed [20,21,22]. In July, the infection expanded as rainfall increased and visible dark sclerotia were found on wheat ears at harvest time in weed-infested ground (Figure 4).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling

The sample was collected by an agronomist in a wheat field located in La Valletta Brianza (Lecco), in the northern Italian region of Lombardy. It consisted of wheat ears embedding ergot sclerotia, single sclerotia dropped to the ground and semi-mature wheat kernels. The wheat ears and corresponding embedded sclerotia were separated at the laboratory and were analyzed as the following: 1) Whole wheat ears (n=11), 2) Sclerotia selected from each ear (n=11), 3) Whole single sclerotia collected from the ground (n = 4) and 4) Wheat kernels, as shown in Figure 5.

2.2. Chemicals and Reagents

All reagents and solvents were of analytical grade. Certified reference standards of ergosine, ergosinine, α-ergocryptine, α-ergocryptinine, ergocornine, ergocorninine, ergocristine, ergocristinine, ergometrine, ergometrinine, ergotamine and ergotaminine were purchased from Biopure (Romer Labs, Tulln, Austria).
Methanol was purchased from VWR Chemicals (Rosny-sous-Bois, France), formic acid and acetonitrile were from Carlo Erba Reagents (Val de Reuil, France) and ultrapure water was from Evoqua Water Technologies (Pittsburgh, PA, USA). Ammonium carbonate was purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), ammonia 25% and Z-Sep/C18 QuEChERS tubes were from Supelco (St. Louis MO, USA).
Standard stock solutions were prepared by dissolving reference materials in acetonitrile to give a concentration of 100 µg/mL for each -ine form and 25 µg/mL for each -inine epimer. A working standard solution containing all 12 EAs at 0.1 µg/mL was prepared in acetonitrile. Calibration curve ranging from 0.03 to 5 ng/mL was prepared in methanol/water/formic acid 60:40:0.4 (v/v/v). The sample extraction solution was 5 mM ammonium carbonate/ acetonitrile 15:85 (v/v).

2.3. Sample Preparation

Wheat kernels were finely milled and a 10±0,1 g aliquot was weighted and extracted with 40 mL of extraction solution, vortexed, horizontal shaken for 30 minutes and centrifuged at 4000 rpm at 4°C. An aliquot portion of the extract was withdrawn and cleaned-up with Z-Sep/C18 QuEChERS. After centrifugation, the supernatant was nitrogen dried at ambient temperature, reconstituted with 0.5 mL methanol/water/formic acid (60:40:0.4 v/v/v) and further diluted 1:50 with the same solvent.
Single wheat ears and ergot sclerotia were individually ground and entirely extracted with 10 mL of extraction solution. After shaking and centrifugation, the supernatant was cleaned-up with Z-Sep/C18 QuEChERS, nitrogen dried and reconstituted with 0.2 mL methanol/water/formic acid (60:40:0.4 v/v/v) and further diluted 1:100 with the same solvent to have a response within the calibration range.

2.4. LC-MS/MS Analysis

The ergot alkaloids analysis was performed using a liquid chromatography system consisting of an Acquity I class UPLC (Waters) coupled to a Xevo TQxS mass spectrometer. Mobile phase A was 10 mM ammonium carbonate solution (pH 10 with ammonia 25%) while mobile phase B was acetonitrile. EAs separation was achieved by means of an Acquity UPLC BEH C18 100 mm x 2.1 mm 1.7 µm column using a gradient-elution chromatography, as detailed in Tables S1 and S2.
In order to highlight characteristic transitions and the most appropriate detection conditions, tuning solutions of individual analytes were directly infused into the mass spectrometer detector. For each precursor ion, two daughter ions were monitored [24].The LC-MS/MS parameters for all analytes are presented in Table 1. The fragmentation was carried out in the positive ionization mode (ESI +) under the conditions reported in Table S3.

2.5. Other Mycotoxins Investigation

The wheat kernels sample was analyzed for additional mycotoxins, including aflatoxins, ochratoxin A, deoxynivalenol, zearalenone, fumonisins and T2-HT2 toxins. Analytes were extracted with organic solvents and purified with IAC. The analyses were carried out using validated and accredited LC-MS/MS analytical methods routinely apply by the laboratory for official controls.

2.6. Quantification

According to SANTE/12089/2016 [24], identification and quantification of ergot alkaloids was carried out on the basis of analytes retention time, ion fragments and ion ratio and compared to those originating from reference standard and control samples (blank samples fortified with EAs at limit of detection value). Specification for ionic ratio was ±30% and ±0.1 minutes for the retention time.
Matrix effect was assessed prior to validation procedures and evaluate as not relevant. All EAs had an instrumental response in matrix-matched diluent that did not differ by more than 20% from that of a solvent.
For this reason, ergot alkaloids concentration was extrapolated by means of the least squares regression method based on a calibration curve prepared in methanol/water/formic acid 60:40:0.4 (v/v/v) ranging from 0.03 to 5 ng/mL. LC-MS/MS chromatograms of 12 EAs at a concentration of 3 ng/mL are shown in Figures S1–S3.

2.7. Performance Evaluation

Further to the European Commission Recommendation 2012/154/EU, the analytical method for monitoring the occurrence of ergot alkaloids in food has been developed and validated [25]. In accordance with the EURL-MP guidance on performance criteria for plant toxins and Regulation 2782/2023/EC [26,27], the following performance parameters were evaluated: specificity, recovery rates, linearity, repeatability, intra-laboratory reproducibility and limit of quantification (LOQ). The method can be applied to cereals and similar products and it is linear for concentrations of EA between 2 and 600 µg/kg. The linearity of the reference materials was confirmed by a correlation coefficient (R2) higher than 0,99 and residuals ≤ 20 %. Specificity was verified by analyzing blank matrices such as rye flakes, oat flakes, oatmeal, wheat, wheat flour and barley. No significant interference peaks were identified in the chromatograms and these food matrices were used for validation purposes. Repeatability and recovery were assessed by analyzing the blank samples spiked with EAs at different concentrations in six replicates per level. Spiking values were 2, 10, 50, 150, 250 and 600 µg/kg. According to the EURL-MP guidance [27], for each concentration levels, the mean recovery for each ergot alkaloid and for the sum of the 12 of them was in the range 70-120%. Repeatability, expressed as percentage relative standard deviation (RSDr), was ≤ 20% (Tables S7–S9). Intra-laboratory reproducibility (RSDR) was ≤ 20% and was calculated on-going by assessing the outcomes of six batch sequences under routine conditions as recommended by EURL-MP guidance [27]. The LOQ was set at 2 µg/kg as stated in Regulation 2782/2023/EC [26].

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Ergot Alkaloids Occurrence

The wheat sample analyzed for EAs in this study showed that the alkaloids content in sclerotia was highly variable, ranging from 0.01 to 0.5%, with no correlation between alkaloid content and individual sclerotia size (Figure 6), as confirmed by the 2017 EFSA report [28].
The total content of EAs (T-EAs), which refers to the sum of 12 EAs, ranged from 3 to 4951 mg/kg in sclerotia, up to 33 mg/kg in wheat ears, and 1 mg/kg in kernels (Table S4). As shown in Figure 7, the wheat ears were visibly affected by Claviceps fungus. Regulation 915/2023 [15] sets maximum residue limits (MRLs) based on the sum of the epimeric forms. This implies that epimerization is not critical as long as the EAs sum remains unchanged. However, the EAs were also individually quantified. The study revealed that the alkaloid profile was very similar: all 12 ergot alkaloids were consistently present in the samples. Additionally, the levels of ergotamine/ergotaminine were the lowest, as shown in Tables S5 and S6. Ergosine was the predominant alkaloid in 33% of the sclerotia samples, with concentrations ranging from 92.8 to 705.7 µg/kg. Ergometrine was the most frequently detected alkaloid in 72% of the wheat ear samples, with concentrations ranging from 8 to 55 µg/kg. In the kernels, ergocristine was the most prevalently detected alkaloid with a value of 350 µg/kg.
According to other European studies [28,29,30,31], in analyzed samples, the -ine (R)-epimer forms were much higher than the -inine forms (92% and 8%). The epimerization occurs spontaneously, but its mechanisms remain largely unknown [9]. In the case of cereal-derived products, such as bread, epimerization may depend on the processing of the raw material, such as baking [28,29].

3.2. Mycotoxins Occurrence

Temperature, humidity, water availability, and insects are among the factors that can affect the infection of plants by mycotoxic fungi and the production of mycotoxins. In addition to Claviceps spp., several other mycotoxigenic species may infect the crops, including Fusarium, Aspergillus and Penicillium. It is worth noting that Fusarium species are known to commonly colonize crops in the field, while Aspergillus and Penicillium species are more likely to grow on cereals in unsuitable conditions during drying and storage [2].
In this study, the wheat kernels were analyzed also for other mycotoxins (aflatoxins, ochratoxin A, deoxynivalenol, zearalenone, fumonisins and T2-HT2 toxins) and only deoxynivalenol (DON) was found at a concentration of 2251 µg/kg, which exceeds the maximum level of 1750 µg/kg for unprocessed durum wheat grains, for human consumption, set by EU Regulation 2023/915 [15].
In another recent Italian study [32], high levels of DON have been found in wheat kernels and its occurrence has always been associated with extreme climatic conditions, such as heavy rainfall during the flowering season. Furthermore, recent quantitative estimates suggest that cereals in certain regions of Europe may experience increased contamination with DON and aflatoxin B1 due to global warming [2,33,34].

3.3. Potential Contamination Scenarios

The results of this study showed that the concentration of ergot alkaloids detected in sclerotia varied independently of their size, as detailed in Table S4. These results were used to formulate possible contamination scenarios in order to assess the potential contamination of food products, such as 1 kg of durum wheat flour, produced from wheat kernels milled in the presence of sclerotia.
Three scenarios were assessed, as summarized in Table 2, based on different sclerotia weights: the highest (0.20 g), the average (0.10 g) and the lowest (0.03 g) weight measured.
In addition, were also included the lowest and the highest EA concentrations found for each type of sclerotia. From these results, the total amount of EAs, that might contaminate 1 kg of durum wheat flour, was estimated.
The EU Regulation 2023/915 states that the total EAs content in wheat products for human consumption should be between 100 (50 µg/kg from 1 July 2024) and 150 µg/kg, depending on the ash content [15]. In the worst-case scenario (scenario 1, Table 2) the accidental occurrence of milled sclerotia together with wheat kernels might lead to flour contamination with EAs content of 231 µg/kg, exceeding the legal limits. It is worth noting that the situation is more concerning for infant foods, where the limits are significantly lower (20 µg/kg).
These scenarios are based on the analysis results of wheat samples collected from fields after heavy rainfall, without undergoing any cleaning procedures [28].
It is however important to note that cleaning procedures don't always effectively reduce EAs contamination in food. For example, small sclerotia may grow to kernel size during drought conditions, or intact sclerotia may break into small fragments during transport [5,35].

3.4. Climate Change and Ergot Alkaloids Occurrence in European Countries

The Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S), implemented by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), has published its latest annual reports on the European State of the Climate (ESOTC). The reports highlight that Europe has experienced warmer than average climate scenarios in recent years, with the mean temperature in 2020 being more than 1.6°C above the average. The 2021 was colder than previous years, but still warmer than the average. The 2022, the temperature was 0.9 degrees above the average, which may have contributed to a decrease in rainfall. In 2023, Europe experienced its second-warmest year on record, with temperatures 1.02°C above the average. The summer saw above-average precipitation over most of Western Europe, resulting in local rainfall records being broken and leading to flooding in some cases [36].
Mycotoxins are typically not found in food or feed from European countries. However, changes in the distribution of certain target fungal species in regions affected by climate change may lead to their occurrence. For instance, a greater increase in the distribution of Fusarium fungi and mycotoxins is expected in EU countries [37].
In the summer of 2023, Italy experienced widespread and intense storms and rainfalls, particularly in northern Italy [23], which resulted in the proliferation of Claviceps spp. and Fusarium spp. in field, as described in this study.
The intoxication caused by the consumption of products derived from cereals contaminated with ergot alkaloids reached its peak in Europe in the Middle Ages, when many thousands of people were affected by ergotism [13].
The latest recorded epidemics were in Germany (1879-1881), Ethiopia (1977-1978), Russia (1926-1927), France (1951), India (1975), Brazil (1995) and Australia (1996) leading to increased controls [5,13,38,39]. Climate change has brought higher temperatures, with intense summer rainfall alternating with periods of drought, leading to the growth of the fungus, making it an ongoing problem to be solved. Ergot contamination is still a major problem for agriculture [5,13].
Over the last century, precipitation has increased by 10-40% in northern Europe and decreased in southern Europe.
The average annual temperature in Europe is forecast to increase by 2.0°C to 6.3°C over the next century. Studies have shown that climate change will significantly affect mycotoxin contamination in various cereals [2,40,41,42].
EFSA has examined the impact of climate change on the occurrence of mycotoxins in certain regions. While it may have a negative effect in some areas, it could also be beneficial for specific geographical regions [43,44].
In recent years, from 2020 to 2024, twenty-two RASFF notifications have been generated mostly from North European countries due to an increase in EAs contamination in food and feed [17]. Germany has a higher frequency of ergot contamination, as evidenced by the number of alerts and confirmed by several studies [5,11,45].
EFSA's 2017 report on dietary exposure to ergot alkaloids (EAs) in humans and animals found an increase in their occurrence across 22 European countries between 2004 and 2016. The report also revealed that Claviceps spp. contamination was highest in rye and its derivatives. The presence of sclerotia correlated linearly with EAs content, but measurable levels were still identified in the absence of sclerotia [28].
In recent years, several European countries have reported cases of ergot contamination in cereals. In Belgium, a study of 2012 [46] showed that EA levels in the cereal contaminated samples varied from 1 to 1145 µg/kg but most recently, in another study of 2021, 49 samples of cereal-based baby food from Belgian market were analyzed and all samples complied with the MRL ≤ 20 µg/kg [47].
In a 2018 study, ergot alkaloids were found in all 122 samples of rye grains harvested in Poland, with levels ranging from 4.7-667.9 μg/kg [30].
In an Albanian study, the EA levels in winter wheat samples in 2014 ranged from 17.3 to 975.4 µg/kg, and from 10.3 to 390.5 µg/kg in 2015 [48].
In a Dutch study, 2020, bread made from different cereals (wheat, rye, multigrain, rye and wheat) showed EAs ranging from LOQ (0.3-1.2 µg/kg) to 335 µg/kg [49].
In Slovenia, 206 wheat samples were analyzed in 2020. The EAs content ranged from 14 to 4217 µg/kg, with a mean value of 363 µg/kg. The highest EA concentrations were found in 16 oat samples (84 to 2191 µg/kg) with a mean value of 594 µg/kg [50].
In other Italian studies, the situation is comparable to our study. Debegnach et al. (2019) observed that 87% of analyzed wheat or rye flour and bread samples from the Italian market were contaminated. EA levels ranged from 2.5 to 1142.6 µg/kg, the most contaminated food category was wheat bread [29]. Lattanzio et al. (2021) reported a range of 2.7-270.7 µg/kg of EAs in 67 cereal samples collected in central and southern Italy between 2017 and 2020 [51]. Carbonell-Rozas et al. (2023) demonstrated the correlation between heavy precipitation and Claviceps spp. contamination in cereals. The study analyzed different types of cereals grown side by side and harvested between 2020 and 2022 in Northern Italy. In 2020, the overall contamination of all considered species was particularly high, with 60% of positive samples being found. This was caused by a greater amount of rainfall during the growing season (April-June) compared to other years.
Tritordeum, a hybrid crop obtained by crossing durum wheat with the wild barley Hordeum chilense [52], and rye crops were the most contaminated, with levels ranging from 4,302-15,389 μg/kg [19].

4. Conclusions

This work shown how adverse climatic events, dependent on climate change, may negatively affect durum wheat production, leading to the growth of mycotoxigenic fungi that pose a health risk to consumers of cereal-based food.
Climate change can affect fungal infection both directly and indirectly. Directly, it can increase the susceptibility of the host to infection through heavy rains, heat and drought stress. Indirectly, it can affect the seeding time of crops. Mycotoxigenic fungi may infect crops at any stage of the growing chain, including harvest, transport and storage. Pre-harvest strategies including good agricultural practices (GAP), such as rotating out susceptible crops is often the simplest method of preventive control of ergot bodies.
The study results showed that the content of ergot alkaloids in the analyzed sclerotia was independent of the ergot size. The highest EAs content found in sclerotia weighing 0.03 g was 4951 mg/kg, while in sclerotia weighing 0.2 g, the highest content was 1159 mg/kg. On the basis of the scenarios presented in Table 2, it is estimated that even the smallest sclerotia might contaminate 1 kg of durum wheat flour at a concentration higher than the legal limits set in EU Regulation 2023/915. This is of particular concern for cereal-based baby foods, where the legal limit is much lower at 20 µg/kg.
Consumption of food from cereals contaminated with ergot alkaloids may result in human and animal intoxication, indicating that ergotism remains a relevant risk and has not yet been completely eliminated. However, when food products are already contaminated, decontamination requires physical, chemical and biological processes, many of which can only reduce the toxicity of ergot alkaloids by promoting the epimerization process.
Cereals are widely recognized as an important food category due to their high nutritional value and their crucial role in a balanced diet. In order to mitigate the occurrence of mycotoxin-producing fungi, it is recommended that all stages of production be closely monitored. It is suggested to implement official controls in the field to protect human health and economic losses.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at the website of this paper posted on Preprints.org, Table S1: LC conditions; Table S2: Gradient Elution Program; Table S3: MS/MS parameters; Table S4: EAs sum of sclerotia samples and corresponding wet weight; Table S5: The concentrations of ergot alkaloids (-ine forms) in analyzed samples; Table S6: The concentrations of ergot alkaloids (-inine forms) in analyzed samples; Table S7: Validation Parameters for each EA -ine form at six spiking levels; Table S8: Validation Parameters for each EA -inine form at six spiking levels; Table S9: Validation Parameters for EAs sum; Figure S1: Chromatograms of ergocristine, ergocryptine and corresponding epimers at 3 ng/mL; Figure S2: Chromatograms of ergosine, ergocornine and corresponding epimers at 3 ng/mL ; Figure S3: Chromatograms of ergotamine, ergometrine and corresponding epimers at 3 ng/mL.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.C., G.F. and M.P.; methodology, E.C., I.P., G.M.S. and E.B.M.; software, I.P. and E.C.; validation, E.C., I.P., G.M.S. and E.B.M.; formal analysis, E.C. and I.P.; investigation, E.C., G.F. and G.P.; resources, I.P., G.M.S. and G.P.; data curation, E.C., G.F. and M.P.; writing—original draft preparation, M.P., G.M.S. and E.B.M.; writing—review and editing, M.P., E.C. and G.F.; visualization, E.C.; supervision, E.C. and G.F.; project administration, E.C.; funding acquisition, E.C. and G.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Italian Ministry of Health, Grant number: PRC2020008.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available by authors upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to G. Pedretti for providing the in-situ photographs.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. H. Lee and J. Romero Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2023.
  2. Medina, Á.; González-Jartín, J.M.; Sainz, M.J. Impact of Global Warming on Mycotoxins. Current Opinion in Food Science 2017, 18, 76–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Coufal-Majewski, S.; Stanford, K.; McAllister, T.; Blakley, B.; McKinnon, J.; Chaves, A.V.; Wang, Y. Impacts of Cereal Ergot in Food Animal Production. Front. Vet. Sci. 2016, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). Risks for Human Health Related to the Presence of Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids in Honey, Tea, Herbal Infusions and Food Supplements. EFSA Journal 2017, 15, 4908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Krska, R.; Crews, C. Significance, Chemistry and Determination of Ergot Alkaloids: A Review. Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A 2008, 25, 722–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. EFSA Contam Panel (EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain) Scientific Opinion on Ergot Alkaloids in Food and Feed. EFSA Journal 2012, 10, 2798. [CrossRef]
  7. Walkowiak, S.; Taylor, D.; Fu, B.X.; Drul, D.; Pleskach, K.; Tittlemier, S.A. Ergot in Canadian Cereals – Relevance, Occurrence, and Current Status. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 2022, 44, 793–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. El-Sayed, R.A.; Jebur, A.B.; Kang, W.; El-Demerdash, F.M. An Overview on the Major Mycotoxins in Food Products: Characteristics, Toxicity, and Analysis. Journal of Future Foods 2022, 2, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Schummer, C.; Zandonella, I.; van Nieuwenhuyse, A.; Moris, G. Epimerization of Ergot Alkaloids in Feed. Heliyon 2020, 6, e04336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. EFSA Contam Panel (EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain), D; Bignami, M.; Bodin, L.; Chipman, J.K.; del Mazo, J.; Grasl-Kraupp, B.; Hogstrand, C.; Leblanc, J.-C.; Nebbia, C.S.; Nielsen, E.; et al. Risks for Animal Health Related to the Presence of Ergot Alkaloids in Feed. EFSA Journal 2024, 22, e8496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Silva, Â.; Mateus, A.R.S.; Barros, S.C.; Silva, A.S. Ergot Alkaloids on Cereals and Seeds: Analytical Methods, Occurrence, and Future Perspectives. Molecules 2023, 28, 7233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Agriopoulou, S. Ergot Alkaloids Mycotoxins in Cereals and Cereal-Derived Food Products: Characteristics, Toxicity, Prevalence, and Control Strategies. Agronomy 2021, 11, 931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Haarmann, T.; Rolke, Y.; Giesbert, S.; Tudzynski, P. Ergot: From Witchcraft to Biotechnology. Molecular Plant Pathology 2009, 10, 563–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Janik, E.; Niemcewicz, M.; Ceremuga, M.; Stela, M.; Saluk-Bijak, J.; Siadkowski, A.; Bijak, M. Molecular Aspects of Mycotoxins—A Serious Problem for Human Health. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2020, 21, 8187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Commission Regulation (EU) Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/915 of 25 April 2023 on Maximum Levels for Certain Contaminants in Food and Repealing Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 (Text with EEA Relevance); 2023.
  16. European Commission Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/1399 of 24 August 2021 Amending Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 as Regards Maximum Levels of Ergot Sclerotia and Ergot Alkaloids in Certain Foodstuffs; 2021; Vol. 301.
  17. RASFF - Food and Feed Safety Alerts. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/food/safety/rasff-food-and-feed-safety-alerts_it (accessed on 19 April 2022).
  18. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Polano, C., Sanseverino, I., Ermolli, M.G.L., Porcel Rodriguez, E., Bisselink, Mycotoxin Fungal Plant Diseases and Climate Change: State of the Art and beyond, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2024. Available online: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/690696, JRC136458 (accessed on 13 March 2024).
  19. Carbonell-Rozas, L.; Alabrese, A.; Meloni, R.; Righetti, L.; Blandino, M.; Dall’Asta, C. Occurrence of Ergot Alkaloids in Major and Minor Cereals from Northern Italy: A Three Harvesting Years Scenario. J Agric Food Chem 2023, 71, 15821–15828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Menzies, J.G.; Turkington, T.K. An Overview of the Ergot (Claviceps Purpurea) Issue in Western Canada: Challenges and Solutions. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 2015, 37, 40–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gordon, A.; McCartney, C.; Knox, R.E.; Ereful, N.; Hiebert, C.W.; Konkin, D.J.; Hsueh, Y.-C.; Bhadauria, V.; Sgroi, M.; O’Sullivan, D.M.; et al. Genetic and Transcriptional Dissection of Resistance to Claviceps Purpurea in the Durum Wheat Cultivar Greenshank. Theor Appl Genet 2020, 133, 1873–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Azizi, A.; Zhang, Z.; Rui, Z.; Li, Y.; Igathinathane, C.; Flores, P.; Mathew, J.; Pourreza, A.; Han, X.; Zhang, M. Comprehensive Wheat Lodging Detection after Initial Lodging Using UAV RGB Images. Expert Systems with Applications 2024, 238, 121788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. UO Servizio Idro-Nivo-Meteo e Clima di ARPA Lombardia ARPA Lombardia. Available online: https://www.arpalombardia.it/documenti-e-report/ (accessed on 14 March 2024).
  24. European Commission. Health and Food Safety Directorate-General (DG SANTE). In Guidance Document on Identification of Mycotoxins in Food and Feed. SANTE/12089/2016; European Commission DG SANTE: Bruxelles, Belgium, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  25. European Commission Commission Recommendation (EU) 2012/154 of 15 March 2012 on the Monitoring of the Presence of Ergot Alkaloids in Feed and Food; 2012; Vol. 077.
  26. European Commission Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/2782 of 14 December 2023 Laying down the Methods of Sampling and Analysis for the Control of the Levels of Mycotoxins in Food and Repealing Regulation (EC) No 401/2006; 2023.
  27. European Union Reference Laboratory (EURL). EURL MP-Background Doc_003 Guidance Document Performance Criteria v1.1 Draft, Wageningen Food and Safety Research: Wageningen, The Netherlands 2021.
  28. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority); Arcella, D; Gómez Ruiz, J.Á.; Innocenti, M.L.; Roldán, R. Human and Animal Dietary Exposure to Ergot Alkaloids. EFSA Journal 2017, 15, e04902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Debegnach, F.; Patriarca, S.; Brera, C.; Gregori, E.; Sonego, E.; Moracci, G.; De Santis, B. Ergot Alkaloids in Wheat and Rye Derived Products in Italy. Foods 2019, 8, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bryła, M.; Ksieniewicz-Woźniak, E.; Podolska, G.; Waśkiewicz, A.; Szymczyk, K.; Jędrzejczak, R. Occurrence of Ergot and Its Alkaloids in Winter Rye Harvested in Poland. World Mycotoxin Journal 2018, 11, 635–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Orlando, B.; Maumené, C.; Piraux, F. Ergot and Ergot Alkaloids in French Cereals: Occurrence, Pattern and Agronomic Practices for Managing the Risk. World Mycotoxin Journal 2017, 10, 327–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gozzi, M.; Blandino, M.; Bruni, R.; Capo, L.; Righetti, L.; Dall’Asta, C. Mycotoxin Occurrence in Kernels and Straws of Wheat, Barley, and Tritordeum. Mycotoxin Res 2024, 40, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Van der Fels-Klerx, H. j.; Liu, C.; Battilani, P. Modelling Climate Change Impacts on Mycotoxin Contamination. World Mycotoxin Journal 2016, 9, 717–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Perrone, G.; Ferrara, M.; Medina, A.; Pascale, M.; Magan, N. Toxigenic Fungi and Mycotoxins in a Climate Change Scenario: Ecology, Genomics, Distribution, Prediction and Prevention of the Risk. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lauber, U.; Schnaufer, R.; Gredziak, M.; Kiesswetter, Y. Analysis of Rye Grains and Rye Meals for Ergot Alkaloids. Mycotox Res 2005, 21, 258–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) European State of the Climate | Copernicus. Available online: https://climate.copernicus.eu/ESOTC (accessed on 10 April 2024).
  37. Stoev, S.D. Food Security and Foodborne Mycotoxicoses—What Should Be the Adequate Risk Assessment and Regulation? Microorganisms 2024, 12, 580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gabbai; Lisbonne; Pourquier Ergot Poisoning at Pont St. Esprit. Br Med J 1951, 2, 650–651. [Google Scholar]
  39. Munkvold, G.P.; Carson, T.; Thoreson, D. Outbreak of Ergot (Claviceps Purpurea) in Iowa Barley, 1996. Plant Disease 1997, 81, 830–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Medina, A.; Akbar, A.; Baazeem, A.; Rodriguez, A.; Magan, N. Climate Change, Food Security and Mycotoxins: Do We Know Enough? Fungal Biology Reviews 2017, 31, 143–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Magan, N.; Medina, A.; Aldred, D. Possible Climate-Change Effects on Mycotoxin Contamination of Food Crops Pre- and Postharvest. Plant Pathology 2011, 60, 150–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fang, C.; Gurinović, M. (Eds.) Sustainable and Nutrition-Sensitive Food Systems for Healthy Diets and Prevention of Malnutrition in Europe and Central Asia; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2023; ISBN 978-92-5-137534-1. [Google Scholar]
  43. Battilani, P.; Rossi, V.; Giorni, P.; Pietri, A.; Gualla, A.; van der Fels-Klerx, H. j.; Booij, C. j. h.; Moretti, A.; Logrieco, A.; Miglietta, F.; et al. Modelling, Predicting and Mapping the Emergence of Aflatoxins in Cereals in the EU Due to Climate Change. EFSA Supporting Publications 2012, 9, 223E. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. EFSA, E.F.S.; Maggiore, A.; Afonso, A.; Barrucci, F.; Sanctis, G.D. Climate Change as a Driver of Emerging Risks for Food and Feed Safety, Plant, Animal Health and Nutritional Quality. EFSA Supporting Publications 2020, 17, 1881E. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. EFSA Contam Panel (EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain) Opinion of the Scientific Panel on contaminants in the food chain [CONTAM] related to ergot as undesirable substance in animal feed. 2005. [CrossRef]
  46. Diana Di Mavungu, J.; Malysheva, S.V.; Sanders, M.; Larionova, D.; Robbens, J.; Dubruel, P.; Van Peteghem, C.; De Saeger, S. Development and Validation of a New LC–MS/MS Method for the Simultaneous Determination of Six Major Ergot Alkaloids and Their Corresponding Epimers. Application to Some Food and Feed Commodities. Food Chemistry 2012, 135, 292–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Huybrechts, B.; Malysheva, S.V.; Masquelier, J. A Targeted UHPLC-MS/MS Method Validated for the Quantification of Ergot Alkaloids in Cereal-Based Baby Food from the Belgian Market. Toxins 2021, 13, 531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Topi, D.; Jakovac-Strajn, B.; Pavšič-Vrtač, K.; Tavčar-Kalcher, G. Occurrence of Ergot Alkaloids in Wheat from Albania. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess 2017, 34, 1333–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Veršilovskis, A.; Mulder, P.P.J.; Pereboom-de Fauw, D.P.K.H.; de Stoppelaar, J.; de Nijs, M. Simultaneous Quantification of Ergot and Tropane Alkaloids in Bread in the Netherlands by LC-MS/MS. Food Additives & Contaminants: Part B 2020, 13, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Babič, J.; Tavčar-Kalcher, G.; Celar, F.A.; Kos, K.; Červek, M.; Jakovac-Strajn, B. Ergot and Ergot Alkaloids in Cereal Grains Intended for Animal Feeding Collected in Slovenia: Occurrence, Pattern and Correlations. Toxins (Basel) 2020, 12, 730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lattanzio, V.M.T.; Verdini, E.; Sdogati, S.; Caporali, A.; Ciasca, B.; Pecorelli, I. Undertaking a New Regulatory Challenge: Monitoring of Ergot Alkaloids in Italian Food Commodities. Toxins 2021, 13, 871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Alvarez, J.B.; Martín, L.M. Breadmaking Quality in Tritordeum: The Use-Possibilities of a New Cereal. In Triticale: Today and Tomorrow; Guedes-Pinto, H., Darvey, N., Carnide, V.P., Eds.; Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, 1996; pp. 799–805. ISBN 978-94-009-0329-6. [Google Scholar]
Preprints 105738 g001
Figure 1. Ergopeptines (or Ergopeptides) are composed of lysergic acid and a tripeptide moiety that is condensed into a tricyclic system, adapted from reference [6].
Figure 1. Ergopeptines (or Ergopeptides) are composed of lysergic acid and a tripeptide moiety that is condensed into a tricyclic system, adapted from reference [6].
Preprints 105738 g001
Preprints 105738 g002
Figure 2. The durum wheat field Claviceps p. contaminated (Lombardy, Italy): dark wheat ears lodged (G. Pedretti, 2023).
Figure 2. The durum wheat field Claviceps p. contaminated (Lombardy, Italy): dark wheat ears lodged (G. Pedretti, 2023).
Preprints 105738 g002
Preprints 105738 g003
Figure 3. The mountain wheat field in Lombardy, Italy (G. Pedretti, 2023).
Figure 3. The mountain wheat field in Lombardy, Italy (G. Pedretti, 2023).
Preprints 105738 g003
Preprints 105738 g004
Figure 4. The wheat field in La Valletta Brianza (Lecco, Lombardy, Italy) (G. Pedretti, 2023).
Figure 4. The wheat field in La Valletta Brianza (Lecco, Lombardy, Italy) (G. Pedretti, 2023).
Preprints 105738 g004
Preprints 105738 g005
Figure 5. Wheat sample collected in Lecco province (Lombardy, Italy) (G. Pedretti, 2023).
Figure 5. Wheat sample collected in Lecco province (Lombardy, Italy) (G. Pedretti, 2023).
Preprints 105738 g005
Preprints 105738 g006
Figure 6. Sclerotia samples (IZSLER, 2023).
Figure 6. Sclerotia samples (IZSLER, 2023).
Preprints 105738 g006
Preprints 105738 g007
Figure 7. The durum wheat ears contaminated with ergot (a; b) (G. Pedretti, 2023).
Figure 7. The durum wheat ears contaminated with ergot (a; b) (G. Pedretti, 2023).
Preprints 105738 g007
Table 1. LC-MS/MS parameters for all EAs.
Table 1. LC-MS/MS parameters for all EAs.
ERGOT ALKALOIDS Retention time Dwell time
(s)		 Precursor Ion (m/z) Product Ion (m/z) Q/q1 Collision
Energy (V)
Ergocornine/ -inine 5.32/6.82 0.020 562.4 223.0/304.9 30/24
Ergocryptine/ -inine 5.72/7.27 0.020 576.4 223.0/305.0 30/24
Ergocristine/ -inine 5.86/7.44 0.020 610.4 223.0/305.0 30/24
Ergometrine/ -inine 1.68/2.77 0.020 326.2 208.1/223.1 30/25
Ergosine/ -inine 4.53/6.11 0.020 548.4 223.0/268.0 28/20
Ergotamine/ -inine 4.77/6.44 0.020 582.4 208.1/223.1 35/40
1Q=qualifier, q=quantifier.
Table 2. Potential Contamination Scenarios.
Table 2. Potential Contamination Scenarios.
Scenario 1 2 3
Sclerotia mean weight 0.20 g 0.10 g 0.03 g
EAs content in sclerotia1 110-1159 mg/kg 147-1422 mg/kg 3-4951 mg/kg
EAs content in food product2 22-231 µg/kg 14-142 µg/kg 0.10-149 µg/kg
1the lowest and the highest EAs content values found for each sclerotia. 2the lowest and the highest EAs content estimated in food product (1 kg of durum wheat flour contaminated after milling with sclerotia).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.

Downloads

99

Views

66

Comments

0

Subscription

Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.

Email

Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated