Submitted:
01 May 2024
Posted:
02 May 2024
Read the latest preprint version here
Abstract
Keywords:
Introduction
Literature Review
Problems with Installing Software
Possible Solutions to Installing and Gaining Access to Software
- Tailored Virtual Environments: Implement custom virtual machines or containers with pre-installed software suites, ensuring uniformity across student setups and eliminating individual installation hassles.
- Collaborative IT Engagement: Engage closely with institutional IT services to streamline software deployment. Leverage their expertise in defining system requisites, software licensing, and deployment methodologies aligned with your institution’s tech infrastructure.
- Embrace Cloud Solutions: Embrace cloud-based and SaaS solutions for critical tools, bypassing local installations. This approach enables students to access software via web browsers, mitigating compatibility issues and enhancing accessibility.
- Offer Diverse Software Options: Provide alternative software choices for complex installations or device compatibility challenges, ensuring students have viable substitutes for seamless workflow continuation.
- Foster Peer Learning Networks: Cultivate a culture of mutual support among students through online forums or discussion groups. Encourage sharing of tips, troubleshooting insights, and solutions to common installation hurdles.
- Feedback Integration: Institute a feedback loop for students to share their software installation experiences, leveraging platforms like learning management systems (e.g., Blackboard). Utilize this data to refine future deployment processes, addressing recurring issues proactively.
Course Assignments
Solutions Used in the Database Management Systems Course
- Go to the following URL using any browser. https://desktop.nsuok.edu
- Enter their username and password.
- The students can now access any software installed on the remote machine. In particular, for students in my database management systems course, the students would now select the software application MS Access as shown in Figure 1.
Results
Conclusions
References
- Christine Zaza, Elena Neiterman, “Does Size Matter? Instructors’ and Students’ Perceptions of Students’ Use of Technology in the Classroom”, Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, Volume 18, 2019.
- Dawson, K. (2012). Using action research projects to examine teacher technology integration practices. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28(3), 117-124. [CrossRef]
- Fox, C., Waters, J., Fletcher, G., & Levin, D. (2012). The broadband imperative: Recommendations to address K-12 education infrastructure needs. Washington, DC: State Educational Technology Directors Association.
- Freeland, J., & Hernandez, A. (Samouha, A.). (2014). Schools and software: What’s now and what’s next? San Mateo, CA: Clayton Christensen Institute.
- Hsu, P., & Sharma, P. (2008). A case study of enabling factors in the technology integration change process. Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 213-228.
- International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2021). ISTE Standards for Students. ISTE Standards for Students. https://iste.org/standards/students.
- Ivy M. Tarun, “The Effectiveness of a Customized Online Collaboration Tool for Teaching and Learning”, Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, Volume 18, 2019. [CrossRef]
- John McAvoy & Tom Butler, “A Failure to Learn By Software Developers: Inhibiting the Adoption of an Agile Software Development Methodology”, Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, Volume 11, 2009 – Issue 1, Sep 2014. [CrossRef]
- Lu, R., & Overbaugh, R. (2009). School environment and technology implementation in K-12 classrooms. Computers in the Schools, 26(2), 89-106. [CrossRef]
- Michael Heron, Vicki L Hanson & Ian Ricketts, “Open source and accessibility: advantages and limitations”, Journal of Interaction Science, May 2013. [CrossRef]
- Money matters: Budgets, finances, and resources for tech programs. (2008). Technology and Learning, 28(12), 2.
- National Education Association. (2012). Preparing 21st century students for a global society: An educator’s guide to the “four Cs.” Washington, DC.
- Office of Educational Technology, “A Call to Action for Closing the Digital Access, De- sign, and Use Divides”, 2024 National Educational Technology Plan.
- Steiner, L. (2004). Designing effective professional development experiences: What do we know? Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates.
- Thomas, L., & Knezek, D. (2008). Information, communication, and educational technology standards for students, teachers, and school leaders. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (Vol. 20, pp. 333-348). New York, NY: Springer.
- U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2023). National Educational Technology Plan Update. https://tech.ed.gov/netp/.
- Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teacher practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80-91.
- Xin Xie, Keng Siau & Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah, “COVID-19 pandemic – online education in the new normal and the next normal”, Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, Volume 22, 2020 – Issue 3, Nov 2020. [CrossRef]

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).