Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

RI2AP: Robust and Interpretable 2D Anomaly Prediction in Assembly Pipelines

Version 1 : Received: 26 April 2024 / Approved: 27 April 2024 / Online: 30 April 2024 (04:56:55 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Shyalika, C.; Roy, K.; Prasad, R.; Kalach, F.E.; Zi, Y.; Mittal, P.; Narayanan, V.; Harik, R.; Sheth, A. RI2AP: Robust and Interpretable 2D Anomaly Prediction in Assembly Pipelines. Sensors 2024, 24, 3244. Shyalika, C.; Roy, K.; Prasad, R.; Kalach, F.E.; Zi, Y.; Mittal, P.; Narayanan, V.; Harik, R.; Sheth, A. RI2AP: Robust and Interpretable 2D Anomaly Prediction in Assembly Pipelines. Sensors 2024, 24, 3244.

Abstract

Predicting anomalies in manufacturing assembly lines is crucial for reducing time and labor costs and improving processes. For instance, in rocket assembly, premature part failures can lead to significant financial losses and labor inefficiencies. With the abundance of sensor data in the Industry 4.0 era, machine learning (ML) offers potential for early anomaly detection. However, current ML methods for anomaly prediction have limitations, with F1-measure scores of only 50% and 66% for prediction and detection, respectively. This is due to challenges like the rarity of anomalous events, scarcity of high-fidelity simulation data (actual data is expensive), and the complex relationships between anomalies not easily captured by traditional ML approaches. Specifically, these challenges relate to two dimensions of anomaly prediction: predicting when anomalies will occur and understanding the dependencies between them. This paper introduces a new method called Robust and Interpretable 2D Anomaly Prediction (RI2AP) designed to address both dimensions effectively. RI2AP is demonstrated on a rocket assembly simulation, showing up to a 30-point improvement in F1 measure compared to current ML methods. This highlights its potential to enhance automated anomaly prediction in manufacturing. Additionally, RI2AP includes a novel interpretation mechanism inspired by a causal-influence framework, providing domain experts with valuable insights into sensor readings and their impact on predictions. Finally, the RI2AP model is deployed in a real manufacturing setting for assembling rocket parts. Results and insights from this deployment demonstrate the promise of RI2AP for anomaly prediction in manufacturing assembly pipelines.

Keywords

Anomaly prediction; Smart manufacturing; Assembly processes; Sensor data; Time series analysis

Subject

Computer Science and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.