Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Effectiveness of a Dual-Task Intervention Involving Exercise and Vocalized Cognitive Tasks

Version 1 : Received: 15 April 2024 / Approved: 16 April 2024 / Online: 16 April 2024 (13:59:34 CEST)

How to cite: Abo, M.; Hamaguchi, T. Effectiveness of a Dual-Task Intervention Involving Exercise and Vocalized Cognitive Tasks. Preprints 2024, 2024041040. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202404.1040.v1 Abo, M.; Hamaguchi, T. Effectiveness of a Dual-Task Intervention Involving Exercise and Vocalized Cognitive Tasks. Preprints 2024, 2024041040. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202404.1040.v1

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Population aging is rapidly increasing, and the importance of preventive medicine has been stressed. Health checkup, diet, and exercise are of paramount importance. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a personalized dual-task intervention that combined exercise with cognitive tasks in improving physical and cognitive functions among independently living elderly individuals. Methods: Participants were aged >65 years who were mostly independent in their activities of daily living, divided into 2 groups. The group receiving the 20-min robot-assisted session was compared to the group receiving traditional functional restoration training. This randomized trial assessed the impact of this intervention on the 30-s chair stand test score and Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Japanese version score of the participants. Results: Both scores significantly improved in the intervention group, indicating enhanced lower-limb function and cognitive capabilities. Conclusions: These findings suggest that integrating cognitive tasks with physical exercise can be a potent strategy to improve overall well-being in the elderly, offering valuable insights for designing comprehensive preventive health programs tailored to this demographic.

Keywords

cross-step training; dual task; MoCA-J; CS-30

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Clinical Medicine

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.