Submitted:
11 April 2024
Posted:
12 April 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Overview of Study Area
2.2. Parameter Selection and Measurement Method of Nest Site
2.3. Data Analysis Method
3. Results
3.1. Nest Characteristics and Nest Spacing
3.2. Nesting Tree Selsection
3.3. Principal Component Analysis of Nest Site Selection
3.4. Nest Site Factors Affecting Reproductive Success of Giant Babax
4. Discussion
4.1. Selection of Nesting Tree Species
4.2. The Main Nest Site Factors of Nesting Site Selection of Giant Babax
4.3. Nest Site Factors Affecting Reproductive Success of Giant Babax
4.4. The Threat to the Population Development of Giant Babax
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
References
- Neve, L.D.; Soler, J.J. Nest-building activity and laying date influence female reproductive investment In magpies:an experimental study. Animal Behaviour 2002, 63, 975–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burke, D.M.; Nol, E. Influence of food abundance, nest-site habitat, and forest fragmentation on breeding ovenbirds. The Auk: Ornithological Advances 1998, 115, 96–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kesler, D.C.; Haig, S.M. Microclimate and nest-site selection in Micronesian Kingfishers. Pacific Science 2005, 59, 499–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haynes, T.B.; Schmutz, J.A. Lindberg, M.S., et al. Risk of predation and weather events affect nest site selection by sympatric pacific (Gaviapacifica) and Yellow-billed (Gaviaadamsii)loons inarctic habitats. Waterbirds.
- Wysocki, D. Nest site selection in the urban population of blackbirds Turdus merula of Szczecin(NWP oland). Acta Ornithologica 2014, 40, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, W.; Wu, Y.M.; Hu, J.C.; et al. Nest Site Selection and Materials of Pycnonotus sinensis in NanchongSichuan. Sichuan Journal of Zoology 2006, 25, 590–593. [Google Scholar]
- Du, B.; Zhao, Q.S.; Liu, C.J.; et al. Giant babaxes mix brood reduction and brood survival strategies. Journal of Ornithology 2012, 153, 611–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Badyaev, A.V. Nesting habitat and nesting success of easternwild Turkeys in the Arkansas Ozark Highlands. Cooper Ornithological Society 1995, 97, 221–232. [Google Scholar]
- Rands, M.R.W. The Effect of Nest Site Selection on Nest Predation in Grey Partridge Perdix perdix andRed-Legged Partridge Alectorisrufa. Ornis Scandinavica 1988, 19, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murray, L.D.; Best, L.B. Nest-site selection and reproductive success of Common Yellow throats in managed Iowa grasslands. The Condor:Ornithological Applications 2014, 116, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, C.Q.; Zheng, G.M. The nest site selection of Tragopan caboti. Acta Zoologica Sinica 1997, 43, 27–33. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, S.S.; Chu, Y.F.; Jiang, X.Y.; et al. Nests Characteristics and Nest-site Selection of Ardea cinerea in Xinxiang Yellow River Wetland Birds National Nature Reserve. Henan.Sichuan Journal of Zoology 2018, 37, 317–323. [Google Scholar]
- Li, L.; Liu, X.G.; Zhang, L.; et al. The nest site selection of Grey Heron in Kubuqi Desert, Inner Mongolia. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment 2015, 29, 144–148. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, L.; Zhang, H.W.; Wang, J.; et al. Nest site selection and breeding success of Daurian redstart Phoenicurus auroreus in northeast China. Acta Ecologica Sinica 2020, 40, 70–76. [Google Scholar]
- Ye, S.Y.; Guo, S.L.; Dou, Z.L.; et al. Nest-site selection of sand martins (Riparia riparia) in the suburbs of Zhengzhou, Henan Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica 2016, 36, 7006–7013. [Google Scholar]
- John, M.K. PASSERIFORMES. In Guide to the Birds of China; The Comcial Press: Bieiing, China, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Y.Y.; Zheng, G.M. Birds. In China’s Red List of Biodiversity: Vertebrates; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2021; Volume Ⅱ, p. 410. [Google Scholar]
- Chinese National Forestry and Grassland Administration; Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs. Chinese Journal of Wildlife 2021, 42, 623. [CrossRef]
- Stattersfield, A.J.; Crosby, M.J.; Long, A.J; et al. Endemic Bird Areas of the World: Priority for Biodiversity Conservation; Bird Life International: Cambridge, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Zheng, Z.X.; Zheng, B.L.; Long, Z.Y. Fauna Sinica, Timaliinae; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1987. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, F.Y.; Gao, L.F.; Wang, Q.; et al. Giant babax(Babaxwaddelli) helpers cheat at provisioning nestlings in poor conditions. Behavioral Ecologyand Sociobiology 2023, 77, 16. [Google Scholar]
- Lu, X. Concervation status and reproductive ecology of giant babax Babaxvaddelli (Aves, timaliinae)Endemic to the Tibet plateau. Oryx 2004, 38, 418–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, X. Leiothrichidae. The birds in Tibetan Plateau of China; Hunan Science Press: Changsha, China, 2018; pp. 603–604. [Google Scholar]
- Lei, Y.; Wang, H.B.; Lu, T.S.; et al. Study on the Characteristics of Temperature Changes in Lhasa City over the Past 49 Years. Earth and Environment 2021, 49, 492–503. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, L.X.; Sui, J.L.; Ma, Q. Influencing Factors Analysis of Nest Site Selection and Reproductive Efficiency of Chinese Sparrowhawk. Scientia Silvae sinicae 2020, 56, 116–122. [Google Scholar]
- Snow, D.W. The Breeding of the blackbirds, song thrush and mistle thrush in Great Britain PartII. Clutch-Size. Bird Study 1955, 2, 78–83. [Google Scholar]
- Borgmann, K.L.; Conway, C.J. The nest-concealment hypothesis: New insights from a comparative analysis. The Wilson Journal of Ornithology 2015, 127, 646–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xi, L.; Yu, L.; Bai, J.; et al. Nest Characteristics and Nest Site Selection of Tetraophasis obscurus in the Wanglang National Nature Reserve. Sichuan Journal of Zoology 2024, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.P.; Zheng, G.M.; Xu, J.L. Habitat use of urban tree sparrows in the process of urbanization: Beijing as a case study. Biodiversity Science 2006, 14, 372–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, X.; Ma, X.; Fan, L. Nesting and Cooperative Breeding Behaviours of High-Altitude Babbler, Tibetan Babax Babaxkoslowi. Acta Ornithologica 2007, 42, 181–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arnold, K.E.; Owens, I.P.F.; Goldizen, A.W. Division of labour within cooperatively breeding groups. Behaviour 2005, 142, 1577–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]



| Sample Plot | Inner Diameter | Outer Diameter | Nest Depth | Nest Height | Breeding Team | Reproductive Success Rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sangpu | 10.2±1.48 | 24.4±1.25 | 7.1±1.14 | 19.6±3.21 | 5.71±1.33 | 66.67 |
| NimaTang | 10.27±1.75 | 25.64±4.39 | 8.47±1.71 | 20.27±2.57 | 5.93±1.14 | 92.86 |
| Qinu | 9.82±2.04 | 21.12±3.43 | 6.58±0.82 | 17.24±2.17 | 6.18±1.27 | 61.54 |
| Xiongse | 11.7±0.4 | 20.3±1.4 | 7.4±0.7 | 15.7±2.1 | 75 |
| Component | Eigenvalue | Variance Percent | Cumulative Variance Percent |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.71 | 27.12 | 27.12 |
| 2 | 1.95 | 19.54 | 46.66 |
| 3 | 1.50 | 14.95 | 61.61 |
| 4 | 1.39 | 13.91 | 75.52 |
| 5 | 0.73 | 7.29 | 82.81 |
| 6 | 0.53 | 5.33 | 88.14 |
| 7 | 0.47 | 4.71 | 92.85 |
| 8 | 0.39 | 3.92 | 96.77 |
| 9 | 0.20 | 1.99 | 98.76 |
| 10 | 0.124 | 1.238 | 100 |
| Environment Alimpactfact | Component | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| Nesting tree species | 0.28 | 0.70 | 0.17 | -0.35 |
| Canopy density | 0.76 | -0.20 | 0.07 | -0.19 |
| Nesting tree height | 0.87 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 0.23 |
| Nesting tree DBH | 0.47 | 0.23 | 0.45 | -0.54 |
| Altitude | 0.18 | -0.77 | 0.50 | 0.05 |
| Distance to road | 0.07 | 0.21 | 0.79 | 0.36 |
| Distance to water | -0.29 | 0.11 | 0.40 | 0.64 |
| Distance to house | -0.15 | 0.84 | -0.06 | 0.24 |
| Type of nest | 0.50 | -0.06 | -0.43 | 0.40 |
| Helpers amount | 0.83 | 0.04 | -0.16 | 0.34 |
| Environment Alimpactfacto | KIF | Estimate | SE | Z-Value | P-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canopy density | 1.56 | 0.09634 | 0.03011 | 3.2 | 0.00138 ** |
| Nesting tree height | 1.61 | 14.03 | 1.209909 | 0.001 | 0.999 |
| Nesting tree DBH | 1.29 | 0.09723 | 0.07198 | 1.351 | 0.177 |
| Altitude | 2.39 | 0.000864 | 0.001593 | 0.542 | 0.588 |
| Distance to road | 1.82 | -0.000333 | 0.00205 | -0.162 | 0.871 |
| Distance to water | 1.30 | -0.006494 | 0.009197 | -0.706 | 0.48 |
| Distance to house | 2.43 | -0.0008058 | 0.0015227 | -0.529 | 0.597 |
| Type of nest | 1.35 | 18.7774 | 2.174129 | 0.009 | 0.993 |
| Environment Alimpactfacto | KIF | Estimate | SE | Z-Value | P-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canopy density | 1.409 | 0.239 | 0.100 | 2.381 | 0.0173 * |
| Nesting tree height | 1.811 | -0.129 | 0.121 | -1.066 | 0.286 |
| Nesting tree DBH | 1.709 | -0.157 | 0.110 | -1.422 | 0.155 |
| Altitude | 2.246 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.640 | 0.522 |
| Distance to road | 2.267 | 0.003 | 0.004 | 0.797 | 0.426 |
| Distance to water | 1.563 | -0.038 | 0.027 | -1.418 | 0.156 |
| Distance to house | 2.396 | -0.001 | 0.002 | -0.416 | 0.677 |
| Type of nest | 1.305 | -0.182 | 0.885 | -0.206 | 0.837 |
| Parasite | 1.338 | 1.687 | 2.797 | 0.006 | 0.995 |
| Helpers amount | 1.575 | 1.583 | 0.622 | 2.546 | 0.0109 * |
| Distance to ground | 2.075 | -0.107 | 0.231 | -0.465 | 0.642 |
| Nest site | 1.9531 | -1.332 | 1.011 | -1.317 | 0.188 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).