Submitted:
10 April 2024
Posted:
11 April 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
2.1.1. Aluminium Alloys
2.1.2. Scrap
2.2. Sample Production
2.2.1. HPDC
2.2.2. Extrusion Alloy: 6063
2.2.3. Sheet Metal Alloys 6181A and 5754
2.3. Filtration and Analysis by Means of Profil Footprinter®
2.4. Additional Tests
2.3.1. Flowability (HPDC Alloys)
2.3.2. Hot Compression (Extrusion Alloys)
2.3.3. Production of Hot Deformed Samples (Sheet Metal)
3. Results
3.1. High Pressure Die Casting (HPDC) Alloys
3.1.1. Flowability Test Results
3.1.2. Microstructure
3.1.3. Prefil Footprinter®
3.2. Extrusion Alloys
3.2.1. Microstructure
3.2.2. Analysis of Inclusions by Means of Prefil Footprinter
3.2.3. Compression Tests
3.3. Sheet Metal Alloys
3.3.1. Microstructure
3.3.2. Analysis of Inclusions by Means of Prefil Footprinter
3.3.3. Mechanical Properties
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
- Using careful scrap selection, it was possible to produce high quality recycled aluminium alloys. However, unwanted elements were introduced in the cases where scrap selection was not excellent. This reinforces scrap selection as a major area of research in circular economy related to structural metals.
- For alloys with high Mg content, oxidation of Magnesium caused reduced content in the final composition of the samples, as well as presence of oxide inclusions. Therefore, even in recycling-intensive material production, some Magnesium will need to be added in addition to reclaiming the element contained in the sourced scrap.
- Detailed Prefil Footprinter® analysis revealed significant differences in the content and nature of inclusions in aluminium alloys, mainly oxides, additives and carbides, which are important for HDCP, extrusion and stamping processes.
- Although the observed differences in non-metallic particle content do not affect microstructural changes, they do have a significant effect on melt flowability, which is critical for HDCP processes. For EN AB-43500 alloys intended for casting, an increase in the scrap content results in an increase in the magnesium oxide content, which reduces the castability of the alloy.
- 6063 alloys intended for extrusion were characterised by a high level of additives, the proportion of which was independent of the amount of scrap used.
- Sheet metal alloys 6181A and 5754 showed no modification in monotonic mechanical properties due to recycling. However, differences were observed in terms of inclusions. Alloy 6181A, similar to 6063, shows no change in impurity content with increasing scrap content, whereas in alloys 5754 an increase in scrap content results in an increase in the amount of magnesium oxides.
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- European Aluminium. Available online: https://european-aluminium.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/aluminum-content-in-european-cars_european-aluminium_public-summary_101019-1.pdf (accessed on 23 May 2023).
- A. Ismail, M.S. Mohamed. Review on sheet metal forming process of aluminium alloys. In Proceedings of the 17 MS 129th Int. AMME Conference. 19-21 April 2016.
- Miller, W.S.; Zhuang, L.; Bottema, J.; Wittebrood, A.J.; De Smet, P.; Haszler, A.; Vieregge, A. Recent development in aluminium alloys for the automotive industry. Mater. Sci. and Eng. A 2000, 280, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Graedel, T.E.; Allwood, J.; Birat, J.-P.; Buchert, M.; Hagelüken, C.; Reck, B.K.; Sibley, S.F. Guido Sonnemann: What do We Know about Metal Recycling Rates? J. Ind. Ecology 2011 15, 355–366. [CrossRef]
- Kaufmann, H. Science of dirty alloys, AluReport 2019, 2, 22–23.
- Jaradeh, M.; Carlberg, T. Method Developed for Quantitative Analysis of Inclusions in Solidified Aluminum Ingots. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2011, 42, 121–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raabe, D.; Ponge, D. Making sustainable aluminum by recycling scrap: The science of “dirty” alloys. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2022, 128, 100947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samuel, A.M.; Samuel, F.H. Metallurgical aspects of inclusion assessment in Al–6%Si casting alloy using the LIMCA technique. Int. J. Met. 2018, 12, 643–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pana, M.A.; Moldovan, P. Researches Concerning PoDFA Method for 5083 Alloys. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Aluminium Alloys, Yokohama, Japan, 5-9 September 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Prillhofer, B.; Antrekowitsch, H.; Böttcher, H.; Enright, P. Nonmetallic inclusions in the secondary aluminum industry for the Production of aerospace alloys. Proceedings of TMS. Light Metals; 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Boczkal, S.; Augustyn, B.; Hrabia-Wiśnios, J.; Kapinos, D.; Lewis, G.; Bareel, P.-F.; Savelli, S.; da Silva, M.; Özen, T. Preparation of High-Quality 6xxx Aluminium Eco Alloys Cast in Billets. Eng. Proc. 2023, 43, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Caro, D.; Tedesco, M.M; Pujante, J.; Bongiovanni, A.; Sbrega, G.; Bricco, M.; Rizzo, P. Effect of Recycling on the Mechanical Properties of 6000 Series Aluminum-Alloy Sheet. Mater. 2023, 16, 6778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Scamans, G.; Li, H.T. ; Fan, Z; (2012). In Melt Conditioned Casting of Aluminum Alloys. In Proceedings of the ICAA13, 3-7 June 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, N.; Kvithyld, A; Tranell, G. The Mechanism Behind the Oxidation Protection of High Mg Al Alloys with Beryllium. Metall Mater Trans B 2018, 49, 2846–2857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, X.; Cambpell; J. Oxide inclusion defects in Al-Si-Mg cast alloys. Can. Metall. Q., 2005, 44, 435–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vonica, D.; Moldovan, P.; Stănică, C.; Buțu, M.; Ciurdaș, M.; Pană, M. Investigations of the nature of non-metallic inclusions in Al-Mg-Mn alloys. U.P.B. Sci. Bull., Series B 2013, 75. ISSN 14546 – 3540. [Google Scholar]
- Baquedano, A.; Niklas, A.; Fernández-Calvo, A.I.; Plata, G.; Lozares, J.; Berlanga-Labari, C. Comparative Study of the Metallurgical Quality of Primary and Secondary AlSi10MnMg Aluminium Alloys, Met. 2021, 11, 1147. [CrossRef]
- Stanică, C.; Moldovan, P. Aluminum melt cleanliness performance evaluation using PoDFA (porous disk filtration apparatus) technology U.P.B. Sci. Bull. B: Chem. Mater Sci, 2009, 71.
- Ásbjörnsson, Einar. Dispersion of grain refiner particles in molten aluminium. PhD Thesis, Univ. of Nottingham, 2001.
- Aluminium And Its Alloys – Fluidity Evaluation Via Multi Strip Testing Moulds. CEN-CENELEC Workshop Agreements, 2024.
- Snopinski, P.; Tanski, T.; Gołombek, K.; Rusz, S.; Hilser, O.; Donic, T.; Nuckowski, P.M.; Benedyk, M. Strengthening of AA5754 Aluminum Alloy by DRECE Process Followed by Annealing Response Investigation: Mater. 2020, 13, 301; [CrossRef]
- Dou, K.; Lordan, E.; Zhang, Y.; Jacot, A.; Fan, Z. A novel approach to optimize mechanical properties for aluminium alloy in High pressure die casting (HPDC) process combining experiment and modelling. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2021, 296, 117193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akhtar, S.; Molina, R.; Di Sabatino, M.; Arnberg, L. On the quality of A354 ingots and its impact on cast product. Metall. Sci. Technol. 2009, 27, 2–10. [Google Scholar]
- Jaradeh, M.M.; Carlberg, T. Method Developed for Quantitative Analysis of Inclusions in Solidified Aluminum Ingots. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2011, 42, 121–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Bao, S.; Akhtar, S.; Tundal, U.; Tjřtta, S.; Li, Y. The Influences of Grain Refiner, Inclusion Level, and Filter Grade on the Filtration Performance of Aluminium Melt. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2021, 52, 3946–3960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Detomi, A.M.; Messias, A.J.; Majer, S.; Cooper, P.S. The imact of TiCAl and TiBAl Grain Refiners on Cast house Processing, In Proceedings of TMS. Light Metals, New Orleans, LA, 919-925; 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Kvithyld, A.; Meskers, C.E.M.; Gaal, S.; et al. Recycling light metals: Optimal thermal de-coating. JOM 2008, 60, 47–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
















| n=5 | Si | Fe | Cu | Mn | Mg | Zn | Cr | Ni | Pb | Sn | Ti |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EN AB-43500 | 10.40 | 0.16 | 0.03 | 0.65 | 0.18 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.07 |
| 6063 | 0.58 | 0.2 | <0.03 | 0.03 | 0.48 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | |||
| 6181A | 0.91 | 0.027 | 0.14 | 0.3 | 0.76 | 0.06 | 0.02 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 |
| 5754 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.02 | 0.16 | 2.86 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 |
| n=5 | Si | Fe | Cu | Mn | Mg | Zn | Cr | Ni | Pb | Sn | Ti |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Die Casting scrap | 10.81 | 0.15 | 0.01 | 0.62 | 0.26 | 0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.07 |
| “6XXX” scrap | 0.45 | 0.23 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.43 | 0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.02 |
| n=5 | Si | Fe | Cu | Mn | Mg | Zn | Cr | Ni | Pb | Sn | Ti |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% scrap | 10.34 | 0.17 | 0.03 | 0.58 | 0.18 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.06 |
| 20% scrap | 10.29 | 0.16 | 0.02 | 0.58 | 0.18 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.06 |
| 40% scrap | 10.25 | 0.16 | 0.02 | 0.56 | 0.19 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.06 |
| 60% scrap | 10.1 | 0.16 | 0.03 | 0.53 | 0.21 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.06 |
| 80% scrap | 10.22 | 0.17 | 0.03 | 0.54 | 0.23 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.06 |
| 100% scrap | 10.01 | 0.14 | 0.03 | 0.51 | 0.25 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.06 |
| EN AB-43500 | 9-11.5 | <0.20 | <0.03 | 0.4-0.8 | 0.15-0.6 | <0.07 | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.15 |
| n=5 | Si | Fe | Cu | Mn | Mg | Zn | Cr | Ni | Pb | Sn | Ti |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% scrap | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.48 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 |
| 20% scrap | 0.72 | 0.21 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.47 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 |
| 40% scrap | 0.62 | 0.21 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.47 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 |
| 60% scrap | 0.51 | 0.23 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.45 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 |
| 80% scrap | 0.51 | 0.23 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.45 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 |
| 100% scrap | 0.5 | 0.23 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.43 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 |
| N=5 | Si | Fe | Cu | Mn | Mg | Zn | Cr | Ni | Pb | Sn | Ti |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% scrap | 0.88 | 0.32 | 0.13 | 0.29 | 0.74 | 0.06 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 |
| 20% scrap | 0.92 | 0.33 | 0.11 | 0.25 | 0.76 | 0.08 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 |
| 40% scrap | 0.95 | 0.32 | 0.10 | 0.22 | 0.71 | 0.08 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 |
| 60% scrap | 0.96 | 0.29 | 0.06 | 0.14 | 0.68 | 0.08 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 |
| 80% scrap | 1.00 | 0.27 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.66 | 0.08 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 |
| 100% scrap | 1.07 | 0.26 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.65 | 0.08 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 |
| n=5 | Si | Fe | Cu | Mn | Mg | Zn | Cr | Ni | Pb | Sn | Ti |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% scrap | 0.18 | 0.29 | 0.02 | 0.16 | 2.78 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 |
| 20% scrap | 0.23 | 0.28 | 0.03 | 0.18 | 2.72 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 |
| 40% scrap | 0.25 | 0.26 | 0.04 | 0.19 | 2.66 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 |
| 60% scrap | 0.35 | 0.28 | 0.06 | 0.21 | 2.49 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 |
| 80% scrap | 0.39 | 0.27 | 0.06 | 0.22 | 2.44 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 |
| 100% scrap | 0.43 | 0.28 | 0.07 | 0.23 | 2.37 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 | <0.03 |
| 1 mm | 3 mm | 5 mm | 7 mm | 9 mm | 11 mm | Average | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ref. ingot | 0 | 135 | 35 | 135 | 60 | 85 | 75.00 |
| 20% scrap | 0 | 100 | 55 | 110 | 95 | 70 | 71.67 |
| 40% scrap | 0 | 90 | 40 | 80 | 65 | 60 | 55.83 |
| 60% scrap | 0 | 130 | 30 | 105 | 75 | 20 | 60.00 |
| 80% scrap | 0 | 40 | 5 | 70 | 20 | 0 | 22.50 |
| 100% scrap | 0 | 70 | 5 | 75 | 20 | 10 | 30.00 |
| Samples | 0% scrap |
20% scrap |
40% scrap |
60% scrap |
80% scrap |
100% scrap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight (kg) | 1.416 | 1.432 | 1.406 | 1.415 | 1.403 | 1.402 |
| Duration (s) | 85 | 100 | 109 | 112 | 134 | 140 |
| Filtration rate (g/s) | 16.7 | 14.3 | 12.9 | 12.6 | 10.5 | 10.0 |
| Samples | 0% scrap |
20% scrap |
40% scrap |
60% scrap |
80% scrap |
100% scrap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight (kg) | 0.687 | 0.632 | 0.77 | 0.649 | 0.747 | 0.749 |
| Duration (s) | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 |
| Filtration rate (g/s) | 4.6 | 4.2 | 5.1 | 4.3 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Samples | 0% scrap |
20% scrap |
40% scrap |
60% scrap |
80% s crap |
100% scrap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight (kg) | 1.127 | 1.287 | 1.323 | 1.247 | 1.273 | 0.934 |
| Duration (s) | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 |
| Filtration rate (g/s) | 7.5 | 8.6 | 8.8 | 8.3 | 8.5 | 6.2 |
| Samples | 0% scrap |
20% scrap |
40% scrap |
60% scrap |
80% scrap |
100% scrap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight (kg) | 1.115 | 1.272 | 1.236 | 1.217 | 1.232 | 1.278 |
| Duration (s) | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 |
| Filtration rate (g/s) | 7.4 | 8.5 | 8.2 | 8.1 | 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Hot Formed | Aged | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scrap level | % Reduction | HV1 | Treatment | HV1 |
| 0% | 42% | 66 ± 2 | 1h 200 °C | 86 ± 3 |
| 40% | 35% | 67 ± 3 | 1h 200 °C | 84 ± 3 |
| 100% | 44% | 67 ± 3 | 1h 200 °C | 82 ± 3 |
| Hot Formed | Cold Worked | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scrap level | % Reduction | HV1 | % Reduction | HV1 |
| 0% | 35% | 71 ± 3 | 66% | 94 ± 3 |
| 40% | 35% | 71 ± 3 | 67% | 94 ± 3 |
| 100% | 42% | 85 ± 3 | 64% | 95 ± 3 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).