Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

A Theory of Intelligences

Version 1 : Received: 9 April 2024 / Approved: 10 April 2024 / Online: 10 April 2024 (09:21:54 CEST)

How to cite: Hochberg, M.E. A Theory of Intelligences. Preprints 2024, 2024040722. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202404.0722.v1 Hochberg, M.E. A Theory of Intelligences. Preprints 2024, 2024040722. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202404.0722.v1

Abstract

Intelligence is a human construct to represent the ability to achieve goals. Given this wide berth, intelligence has been defined countless times, studied in a variety of ways and represented using numerous measures. Understanding intelligence ultimately requires theory and quantification, both of which have proved elusive. I develop a framework – the Theory of Intelligences (TIS) – that applies across all systems from physics, to biology, humans and AI. TIS likens intelligence to a calculus, differentiating, correlating and integrating information. Intelligence operates at many levels and scales and TIS distils these into a parsimonious macroscopic framework centered on solving, planning and their optimization to accomplish goals. Notably, intelligence can be expressed in informational units or in units relative to goal difficulty, the latter defined as complexity relative to system (individual or benchmarked) ability. I present general equations for intelligence and its components, and a simple expression for the evolution of intelligence traits. The measures developed here could serve to gauge different facets of intelligence for any step-wise transformation of information. I argue that proxies such as environment, technology, society and collectives are essential to a general theory of intelligence and to possible evolutionary transitions in intelligence, particularly in humans. I conclude with testable predictions of TIS and offer several speculations.

Keywords

Complexity; Difficulty; Embodiment; Efficiency; Evolution; Goals; Information; Optimization; Surprisal; Uncertainty

Subject

Biology and Life Sciences, Other

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.