Submitted:
01 April 2024
Posted:
02 April 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1.
1.1. Backgrounds
1.2. Previous Research on Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships and Bibliometrics
1.3. Theoretical Background on of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships
1.3.1. Definition of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships
1.3.2. Stages of Autonomy for Autonomous Ships
1.4. The Need to Develop Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Research Subjects
2.1.1. Collecting Research Data
2.1.2. Refining Research Data
2.2. Research Methods
2.2.1. Co-occurrence Analysis
2.2.2. LDA Topic Modeling

3. Results
3.1. Descriptive Statistics Analysis Results
3.1.1. Status by Country
3.1.2. Status by Institution
| Status | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2018~2022) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES (19 case) |
CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES (33 case) |
CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES (38 case) |
CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES (50 case) |
CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES (65 case) |
CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES (205 case) |
| 2 | UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCE (14 case) |
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SYSTEM (25 case) |
WUHAN UNIVERSITY (30 case) |
DALIAN MARITIME UNIVERSITY (46 case) |
DALIAN MARITIME UNIVERSITY (47 case) |
DALIAN MARITIME UNIVERSITY (132 case) |
| 3 | HELMHOLTZ ASSOCIATIO (13 case) |
HELMHOLTZ ASSOCIATIO (24 case) |
DALIAN MARITIME UNIVERSITY (21 case) |
WUHAN UNIVERSITY (29 case) |
UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCE (40 case) |
UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCE (115 case) |
| 4 | CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE (11 case) |
UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCE (16 case) |
UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES (20 case) |
XIDAN UNIVERSITY (26 case) |
WUHAN UNIVERSITY (38 case) |
WUHAN UNIVERSITY (111 case) |
| 5 | NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY CHINA (11 case) |
WUHAN UNIVERSITY (16 case) |
SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY (13 case) |
UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCE (25 case) |
XIDAN UNIVERSITY (33 case) |
XIDAN UNIVERSITY (86 case) |
3.2. Results of Co-Occurrence Analysis
| Status | Main keywords (frequency of occurrence) | Status | Main keywords (frequency of occurrence) |
| 1 | detection (3,428) | 11 | time (1,178) |
| 2 | datum (2,991) | 12 | water (1,166) |
| 3 | image (2,876) | 13 | area (1,101) |
| 4 | system (2,590) | 14 | surface (1,096) |
| 5 | SAR (1,901) | 15 | control (991) |
| 6 | target (1,708) | 16 | accuracy (976) |
| 7 | network (1,653) | 17 | radar (950) |
| 8 | algorithm (1,625) | 18 | dataset (944) |
| 9 | sea (1,430) | 19 | object (929) |
| 10 | performance (1,383) | 20 | sensing (882) |
3.3. Results of LDA Topic Modeling
3.3.1. Coherence Score Measurement Results
| Topic 1 (11.98%) | Topic 2 (9.28%) | Topic 3 (7.94%) | Topic 4 (13.83%) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | Keyword | Prob | Rank | Keyword | Prob | Rank | Keyword | Prob | Rank | Keyword | Prob |
| 1 | detection | 0.035 | 1 | datum | 0.037 | 1 | ice | 0.031 | 1 | system | 0.033 |
| 2 | target | 0.034 | 2 | measurement | 0.019 | 2 | concentration | 0.02 | 2 | control | 0.026 |
| 3 | image | 0.03 | 3 | satellite | 0.018 | 3 | water | 0.015 | 3 | navigation | 0.015 |
| 4 | SAR | 0.028 | 4 | wave | 0.017 | 4 | sea | 0.014 | 4 | algorithm | 0.015 |
| 5 | radar | 0.027 | 5 | surface | 0.016 | 5 | Arctic | 0.012 | 5 | collision | 0.013 |
| 6 | sea | 0.02 | 6 | water | 0.016 | 6 | region | 0.011 | 6 | datum | 0.012 |
| 7 | datum | 0.018 | 7 | ocean | 0.015 | 7 | emission | 0.01 | 7 | motion | 0.008 |
| 8 | algorithm | 0.015 | 8 | wind | 0.014 | 8 | cloud | 0.009 | 8 | simulation | 0.008 |
| 9 | wake | 0.011 | 9 | observation | 0.012 | 9 | surface | 0.009 | 9 | surface | 0.008 |
| 10 | clutter | 0.011 | 10 | sensing | 0.011 | 10 | particle | 0.009 | 10 | path | 0.008 |
| Situational awareness technology research | Ocean observation and sensing research | Arctic navigation research | Navigation decision-making and control technology research | ||||||||
| Topic 5 (14.87%) | Topic 6 (8.15%) | Topic 7 (19.60%) | Topic 8 (14.36%) | ||||||||
| Rank | Keyword | Prob | Rank | Keyword | Prob | Rank | Keyword | Prob | Rank | Keyword | Prob |
| 1 | system | 0.022 | 1 | area | 0.021 | 1 | detection | 0.059 | 1 | system | 0.014 |
| 2 | energy | 0.017 | 2 | oil | 0.018 | 2 | image | 0.049 | 2 | technology | 0.012 |
| 3 | design | 0.013 | 3 | datum | 0.013 | 3 | network | 0.031 | 3 | shipping | 0.011 |
| 4 | power | 0.013 | 4 | water | 0.012 | 4 | SAR | 0.028 | 4 | datum | 0.01 |
| 5 | structure | 0.01 | 5 | marine | 0.01 | 5 | object | 0.02 | 5 | service | 0.008 |
| 6 | condition | 0.009 | 6 | activity | 0.009 | 6 | dataset | 0.02 | 6 | port | 0.007 |
| 7 | performance | 0.008 | 7 | monitoring | 0.008 | 7 | target | 0.018 | 7 | development | 0.007 |
| 8 | process | 0.008 | 8 | fishing | 0.007 | 8 | performance | 0.015 | 8 | industry | 0.007 |
| 9 | fuel | 0.008 | 9 | spill | 0.007 | 9 | classification | 0.015 | 9 | management | 0.007 |
| 10 | load | 0.008 | 10 | island | 0.007 | 10 | accuracy | 0.014 | 10 | time | 0.006 |
| Research on energy and high-efficiency navigation technology | Research on the derivation of autonomous ships |
Research on image analysis and classification | Research on port connectivity | ||||||||
3.3.1. Topic Classification Results
3.3.2. Topic Analysis by Year
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Aslam, S.; Michaelides, M.P.; Herodotou, H. Internet of Ships: A Survey on Architectures, Emerging Applications, and Challenges. IEEE Internet Things J. 2020, 7, 9714–9727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wróbel, K.; Gil, M.; Montewka, J. Identifying research directions of a remotely-controlled merchant ship by revisiting her system-theoretic safety control structure. Saf. Sci. 2020, 129, 104797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mauro, F.; Kana, A. Digital twin for ship life-cycle: A critical systematic review. Ocean Eng. 2023, 269, 113479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hwang, H.; Joe, I. Enhancing IoT Connectivity and Services for Worldwide Ships through Multi-Region Fog Cloud Architecture Platforms. Electronics 2023, 12, 4250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ganchev, I.; Ji, Z.; O’droma, M. Horizontal IoT Platform EMULSION. Electronics 2023, 12, 1864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramos, M.A.; Utne, I.B.; Vinnem, J.E.; Mosleh, A. Accounting for Human Failure in Autonomous Ship Operations. In Safety and Reliability—Safe Societies in a Changing World; Haugen, S., Barros, A., van Gulijk, C., Kongsvik, T., Vinnem, J.E., Eds.; CRC Press: London, UK, 2018; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Rodseth, O.J. From Concept to Reality: Unmanned Merchant Ship Research in Norway. In Proceedings of the Underwater Technology (UT), Busan, Korea, 21–24 February 2017; p. 10. [Google Scholar]
- Chang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Wang, N. The International Legal Status of Unmanned Maritime Vehicles. Marine Policy 2020, 113, 103830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmitt, M.N.; Goddard, D.S. International Law and the Military Use of Unmanned Maritime Systems. Int. Rev. Red Cross 2016, 98, 567–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, D.; Lee, C.; Park, S.; Lim, S. Potential Liability Issues of AI-Based Embedded Software in Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships for Maritime Safety in the Korean Maritime Industry. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Utne, I.B.; Sorensen, A.J.; Schjolberg, I. Risk Management of Autonomous Marine Systems and Operations. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Hamburg, Germany, 5–10 June 2017; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Fan, C.; Wróbel, K.; Montewka, J.; Gil, M.; Wan, C.; Zhang, D. A Framework to Identify Factors Influencing Navigational Risk for Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships. Ocean Eng. 2020, 202, 107188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wrobel, K.; Montewka, J.; Kujala, P. Towards the Assessment of Potential Impact of Unmanned Vessels on Maritime Transportation Safety. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2017, 165, 155–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Web of Science. Available online: https://www.webofscience.com (accessed on 22 November 2023).
- Ananiadou, S.; Rea, B.; Okazaki, N.; Procter, R.; Thomas, J. Supporting Systematic Reviews Using Text Mining. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 2009, 27, 509–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Babić, D.; Kalić, M. Modeling the Selection of Airline Network Structure in a Competitive Environment. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2018, 66, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jun, S.; Park, S.S.; Jang, D.S. Document Clustering Method Using Dimension Reduction and Support Vector Clustering to Overcome Sparseness. Expert Syst. Appl. 2014, 41, 3204–3212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eroglu, Y. Text Mining Approach for Trend Tracking in Scientific Research: A Case Study on Forest Fire. Fire 2023, 6, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rødseth, Ø.J.; Burmeister, H.C. Developments Toward the Unmanned Ship. Proceedings of International Symposium Information on Ships–ISIS 2012, August 2012; Vol. 201; pp. 30–31. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, Tae-eun; Perera, Lokukaluge Prasad; Sollid, Magne-Petter; Batalden, Bjørn-Morten; Sydnes, Are Kristoffer. Safety Challenges Related to Autonomous Ships in Mixed Navigational Environments. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs 2022, 21, 141–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arnsdorf, I. Roll-Royce Drone Ships Challenge $375 Billion Industry: Freight. Bloomberg Online, 2014. Available online: Bloomberg Website (accessed on 2014. 2).
- Lim, Y.; Lee, Y.C. Issues of Autonomous Ships and Implications for Maritime Legislation under IMO Agreements. Legal Studies 2018, 18, 155–181. [Google Scholar]
- Cui, K.; Lin, B.; Sun, W.; Sun, W. Learning-Based Task Offloading for Marine Fog-Cloud Computing Networks of USV Cluster. Electronics 2019, 8, 1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pritchett, P.W. Ghost Ships: Why the Law Should Embrace Unmanned Vessel Technology. Tulane Maritime Law Journal 2015, 40, 197. [Google Scholar]
- Choi, J.; Lee, S.I. An Analytical Review on the Seaworthiness of Unmanned Ships. Maritime Policy Research 2018, 33, 171–191. [Google Scholar]
- Yoon, H. Y.; Kim, J. H.; Choi, H. C. Analysis of Research Trends on Secondary Batteries Using Bibliographic. Information. Journal of Technology Innovation 2023, 26, 463–478. [Google Scholar]
- Jin, S. A.; Heo, G. E.; Jung, Y. K.; Song, M. A Study on Tracking Topic Changes Using Network Analysis Based on Twitter Data. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management 2013, 30, 285–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, N. G.; Lee, D. H.; Choi, H. C. Trends in Text Analysis Technology and Its Applications. Journal of the Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences 2017, 42, 471–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, C. S.; Jeong, J. W. Text Network Analysis: A Case of Understanding Shared Meanings Among Policy Stakeholders through Socio-Cognitive Network Analysis. In Proceedings of the Summer Annual Conference of the Korean Association for Policy Studies; 2013; pp. 828–849. [Google Scholar]
- Park, H.S.; Park, H.R. A Study on the Policy Directions related to the Introduction of Smart Maritime Autonomous Surface Ship (MASS). In Proceedings of the Spring Conference of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research; 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Munim, Z. H. Autonomous ships: A review, innovative applications and future maritime business models. In Proceedings of the Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, Vol. 20, No. 4; 2019; pp. 266–279. [Google Scholar]
- Lim, Y.; Lee, Y. C. Issues of Autonomous Ships and Implications for Maritime Legislation under IMO Agreements. Legal Studies 2018, 18, 155–181. [Google Scholar]
- Ortiz de Rozas, J. M. The Production of Unmanned Vessels and its Legal Implications in the Maritime Industry. Master’s Thesis, [University of Oslo], [Oslo], 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Pritchett, P. W. Ghost Ships: Why the Law Should Embrace Unmanned Vessel Technology. Tulane Maritime Law Journal 2015, 40, 197. [Google Scholar]
- Choi, J.; Lee, S. I. An Analytical Review on the Seaworthiness of Unmanned Ships. Maritime Policy Research 2018, 33, 171–191. [Google Scholar]
- Yoon, H. Y.; Kim, J. H.; Choi, H. C. Analysis of Research Trends on Secondary Batteries Using Bibliographic Information. Journal of Technology Innovation 2023, 26, 463–478. [Google Scholar]
- Jin, S. A.; Heo, G. E.; Jung, Y. K.; Song, M. A Study on Tracking Topic Changes Using Network Analysis Based on Twitter Data. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management 2013, 30, 285–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, N. G.; Lee, D. H.; Choi, H. C. Trends in Text Analysis Technology and Its Applications. Journal of the Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences 2017, 42, 471–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, C. S.; Jeong, J. W. Text Network Analysis: A Case of Understanding Shared Meanings Among Policy Stakeholders through Socio-Cognitive Network Analysis. In Proceedings of the Summer Annual Conference of the Korean Association for Policy Studies; 2013; pp. 828–849. [Google Scholar]
- Schvaneveldt, Roger W. Pathfinder Associative Networks: Studies in Knowledge Organization. Ablex Publishing.
- Jelodar, H.; Wang, Y.; Yuan, C.; Feng, X. Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) and Topic Modeling: Models, Applications, a Survey. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2019, 78, 15169–15211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, C.; Zhang, J.; Liu, D.; Wang, Q.; Lin, S. Technological Topic Analysis of Standard-Essential Patents Based on the Improved Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) Model. Technol. Anal. Strat. Manag. 2022, pp. 1–16.
- Vorontsov, K.; Potapenko, A.; Plavin, A. Additive Regularization of Topic Models for Topic Selection and Sparse Factorization. In Proceedings of the Statistical Learning and Data Sciences: Third International Symposium, SLDS 2015, Egham, UK, 20–23 April 2015; pp. 193–202. [Google Scholar]
- O’Callaghan, D.; Greene, D.; Carthy, J.; Cunningham, P. An Analysis of the Coherence of Descriptors in Topic Modeling. Expert Syst. Appl. 2015, 42, 5645–5657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Durbin, J.; Watson, G.S. Testing for Serial Correlation in Least Squares Regression. III. Biometrika 1971, 58, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seo, Y.; Kim, K.; Kim, J.-S. Trends of Nursing Research on Accidental Falls: A Topic Modeling Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Röder, Michael; Hinneburg, Alexander. Exploring the Space of Topic Coherence Measures. In Proceedings of the Eighth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, 2015, pp. 399–408.
- Im, Jeong-Yeon; Yoon, Ji-Young. Analysis of Trends in Domestic Workplace Women Research through Network Analysis. Asian Women 2018, 57, 201–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, W.; Chen, J.; Zen, W. Best Practices in Building Topic Models with LDA for Mining Regulatory Textual Documents. CDER, 9th 15. 20 November.
- Lee, Seung-Jae; Chae, Tae-Byeong; Kim, Kyung-Tae. Analysis of Ship Classification Performances Using Open-SARShip DB. Korean Journal of Remote Sensing 2018, 34, 801–810. [Google Scholar]
- Um, Dae-Yong; Park, Bo-Seul; Lee, Bang-Hee. Real-time Observation-based AI Prediction Technology Verification for Autonomous Navigation Ship Support. Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Academic Conference, 2022, 2022, 172–173.
- Zhou, Yucheng, et al. An Algorithm for Path Planning of Autonomous Ships Considering the Influence of Wind and Wave. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing, 2021.
- Shin, Jae-Ha. Legal Study on the Commercialization of Autonomous Transport Vehicles - Prospects and Legal Challenges of Autonomous Shipping Operations. Legal Studies 2020, 20, 43–70. [Google Scholar]
- Munim, Ziaul Haque. Autonomous Ships for Container Shipping in the Arctic Routes. Journal of Marine Science and Technology 2022, 27, 320–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Xinyu, et al. Collision-avoidance Navigation Systems for Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships: A State of the Art Survey. Ocean Engineering 2021, 235, 109380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- 56. Konstantinos, Noutsos S. Performance Indicators and Competition Ranking in Women’s and Men’s World Handball Championship 2017. J Phys Educ Sport, 1766.
- Choi HM; Kim MK; Yang H. Deep-learning Model for Sea Surface Temperature Prediction Near the Korean Peninsula. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, April 1, 2023, 208, 105262.
- Nam, Kwon-Woo; Noh, Myung-Il; Lee, Hye-Won; Lee, Won-Jae. Deep Learning-Based Ship Image Classification Method for Autonomous Navigation Ships. Journal of the Korean Society for Computer Engineering and Information Technology 2021, 26, 144–153. [Google Scholar]
- Escorcia-Gutierrez, J.; Gamarra, M.; Beleño, K.; Soto, C.; Mansour, R.F. Intelligent Deep Learning-Enabled Autonomous Small Ship Detection and Classification Model. Computers and Electrical Engineering 2022, 100, 107871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsvetkova, Anastasia; Hellström, Magnus. Creating Value through Autonomous Shipping: An Ecosystem Perspective. Maritime Economics & Logistics 2022, 24, 255–277. [Google Scholar]
- Yoo, Jin-Ho. Implementation of the International Maritime Organization Polar Code in Response to Global Warming and Future Challenges: Initiating Open Regulations in the Arctic and Antarctic and Expanding the Agenda of Eco-friendly Policy.






| Name | Description |
| Maritime Autonomous Surface Ship |
Vessels operating with autonomous decision systems, whether manned or not. |
| Smart Ship | Ships that operate safely and with optimal energy efficiency by connecting with stakeholders to provide information and services, diagnose and manage autonomously or remotely, and the ICT infrastructure to support them. |
| Digital Ship | Ships that can operate safely and efficiently based on digital and IT-based information processing |
| Unmanned Ship | A vessel is operated by an integrated control system with radio equipment installed on board and land, without separate control by the vessel operator. |
| Autonomous Ship | A vessel that operates in response to motion signals input by a ship’s operator on land or by a computer. |
| Remote Ship | Vessels operating under the direct control of a vessel operator onshore. |
| Level | Description |
| 1 | Ship with automated processes and decision support: Seafarers are on board to operate and control shipboard systems and functions. Some operations may be automated |
| 2 | Remotely controlled ship without seafarers on board: The ship is controlled and operated from another location. |
| 3 | Remotely controlled ship without seafarers on board: The ship is controlled and operated from another location. |
| 4 | Fully autonomous ship: The operating system of the ship can make decisions and determine actions by itself. |
| Status | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2018~2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CHINA (120case) |
CHINA (204case) |
CHINA (246case) |
CHINA (381case) |
CHINA (560case) |
CHINA (1,511case) |
| 2 | USA (85case) |
USA (104case) |
USA (90case) |
USA (91case) |
USA (95case) |
USA (465case) |
| 3 | S.KOREA (29case) |
GERMANY (45case) |
S.KOREA (56case) |
S.KOREA (67case) |
S.KOREA (76case) |
S.KOREA (255case) |
| 4 | GERMANY (25case) |
CANADA (32case) |
ENGLAND (34case) |
ENGLAND (43case) |
NORWAY (50case) |
GERMANY (185case) |
| 5 | CANADA (24case) |
ITALY (28case) |
ITALY (32case) |
GERMANY (41case) |
GERMANY (47case) |
CANADA (162case) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
