Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

App-Assisted TF-CBT-Based Intervention as Add-On to Inpatient Treatment Reduces Children’s Post-traumatic Stress Symptoms and Post-traumatic Cognitions

Submitted:

29 March 2024

Posted:

01 April 2024

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Previous studies suggested that trauma-focused cognitive behavior therapy (TF-CBT) is effective in reducing symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression in children and adolescents. However, the effects of app-assisted TF-CBT-based interventions in psychiatric clinics compared to treatment-as-usual (TAU) are under-explored. The purpose of this study was to reveal the added value of the app-assisted TF-CBT-based intervention as an add-on to TAU. The digitalized measures of the Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen (CATS), The Adolescent Dissociative Experience Scale (A-DES), Short Moods and Feelings Questionnaire (SMFQ), PTSD Checklist (PCL-5), and Children's Post-Traumatic Cognitions Inventory (CPTCI) were applied at baseline and post-treatment. The app-assisted TF-CBT-based group participants started with higher levels of negative alterations in cognition and mood compared to TAU participants but at post-treatment, no significant differences were observed between the app-assisted TF-CBT and TAU groups. Within the app-assisted TF-CBT group, post-treatment scores were significantly lower in post-traumatic stress symptoms, intrusion symptoms, alterations in arousal and reactivity, overall post-traumatic cognitions, and belief in being "a fragile person in a scary world”. Within the TAU group, post-treatment scores were notably lower just in dissociation and intrusion symptoms. The study suggests that app-assisted TF-CBT-based intervention can be effective in addressing specific trauma-related symptoms. The findings imply the necessity for screening for traumatic experiences, incorporating trauma-informed care, implementation of TF-CBT into treatment protocols, utilization of app-assisted interventions, tailoring interventions to individual needs, and comprehensive assessment and monitoring of treatment progress.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Traumatic experiences like abuse, natural disasters, or loss of loved ones, may result in numerous harmful consequences on mental health [1,2,3,4], 2.6 times increasing the risk of depressive disorders [5], not to mention post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) [6,7].
Numerous studies revealed that Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT) is effective in reducing symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression [8]. The efficacy of TF-CBT for children has shown large improvements in posttraumatic stress symptoms and secondary symptoms at 12-month follow-up [9]. Some studies found it to be effective in lowering anxiety symptoms [10]. Research evidenced that even shortened versions of TF-CBT, consisting of eight sessions, are effective in reducing PTSD and depression symptoms in adolescents with multiple trauma exposure in low- and middle-income countries [11]. The efficacy of TF-CBT for children was supported by meta-analyses, which showed large effect sizes for posttraumatic growth and emotional management, and moderate to large effects for PTSD and depression [12].
However, little is known about whether digitalized TF-CBT-based interventions delivered in psychiatry units where the participation of caregivers is limited or impossible, could also contribute to children’s mental health. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to reveal the efficacy of app-assisted TF-CBT-based intervention. Prior studies suggested that children’s post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms, dissociation symptoms, moods and feelings, perceived social support, and post-traumatic cognitions could be significant indicators of children’s mental health, so these indicators were chosen to examine the response to app-assisted TF-CBT-based intervention.

1.1. Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavior Therapy

TF-CBT was designed to help children and adolescents who have been exposed to traumatic events and struggle with the psychological consequences of traumatic experiences [13,14,15]. TF-CBT incorporates various components aimed at addressing trauma-related symptoms, including psychoeducation about trauma, learning to apply relaxation techniques, cognitive restructuring, exposure to trauma-related memories and thoughts, trauma narrative, and strengthening of emotional regulation skills with the help of mindfulness exercises [14,16,17,18], which are an integral part of TF-CBT, helping develop present-moment awareness and acceptance of the experience. These exercises include mindful breathing (noticing each inhale and exhale without judgment, which helps cultivate a sense of grounding in the present moment), a guided meditation promoting self-awareness and relaxation, and observing thoughts and emotions as they arise, without getting caught up in them. Mindfulness exercises in TF-CBT aim to empower children to build resilience for the future by developing adaptive emotional regulation skills.
TF-CBT has been tested in various randomized trials and evidence supports its superiority in the treatment of children’s traumas [19]. The TF-CBT proved to be effective in decreasing symptoms of PTSD among adjudicated girls who are victims of domestic minor sex trafficking [20]. The TF-CBT resulted in substantial reductions in both maternal and self-reported severity of sheltered children’s PTSD symptomology [21]. The efficacy of TF-CBT for children in randomized controlled trials was confirmed by systematic reviews and meta-analyses [22].
Previous research suggested that TF-CBT is an effective treatment option for children and adolescents in clinical trials, particularly for PTSD, depression, anxiety, and abuse-related symptoms [23,24,25]. Recent studies provided some evidence of telehealth-based TF-CBT applications, which were proven to be efficient in the case studies [26], including treatment of adolescent PTSD [24], or trials with different samples [27], including children with autism [28], or young people in foster care [29].
TF-CBT is typically delivered by trained mental health professionals. The effect of digitalized TF-CBT intervention, including audiotaped mindfulness exercises for children is still under-researched. The applications of app-assisted TF-CBT-based interventions in children’s psychiatric clinics compared to treatment-as-usual is also not enough explored.

1.2. Post-Traumatic Stress

Numerous research has demonstrated that children's exposure to traumatic events significantly impacts mental health [30,31,32,33] and might result in the development of PTSD or complex PTSD [2], which refers to a condition signifying that a child has experienced distress and impairment in functioning following exposure to emotionally overwhelming incidents [6]. Common symptoms in children who exhibit symptoms of post-traumatic stress are re-experiencing, including flashbacks, nightmares, intrusive thoughts, avoidance of reminders of the trauma, arousal, and reactivity related to the traumatic event, distorted self-views or worldviews, and persistent negative emotions [34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41]. Research also evidenced that not all children who experience trauma will develop post-traumatic stress symptoms, and individual responses can vary depending on protective factors, but these factors are still under-researched [42]. Earlier research also confirmed that TF-CBT is efficient in decreasing symptoms of PTSD [8,9]. However, it is not clear whether app-assisted TF-CBT-based intervention can significantly reduce the symptoms of PTSD, and which group of PTSD symptoms it targets the most.

1.3. Post-Traumatic Cognitions

On the whole, TF-CBT incorporates cognitive-behavioral techniques to help individuals process and cope with traumatic experiences [13,14,43]. It focuses on addressing the cognitive distortions and negative beliefs that may result from the trauma. Earlier research evidenced that due to traumatic experiences, children may develop numerous negative cognitions [44,45]. Children might develop negative beliefs about themselves, including a negative self-view [46]. Traumatic experiences might also contribute to a negative worldview [4,46,47,48]. Addressing post-traumatic cognitions is fundamental in helping children recover from the impact of traumatic experiences, and TF-CBT intends to identify maladaptive cognitions and help children develop more adaptive thought patterns and coping mechanisms [10,48,49,50,51,52,53]. Several clinical trials suggested that post-traumatic cognitions are important treatment targets [1,54,55]. However, it is not clear whether app-assisted TF-CBT-based intervention could substantially improve the cognitions of children hospitalized in psychiatry units.

1.4. Dissociation Symptoms

Next, previous studies also evidenced that traumatic experiences might be related to dissociation symptoms, including depersonalization, derealization, amnesia, identity confusion, flashbacks, or difficulty concentrating [56,57], referring to a disconnection between an individual's thoughts, identity, consciousness, or memory, which can be a coping mechanism in response to traumatic events [58,59,60,61,62]. Traumatic experiences can lead to dissociation as a way for the child to mentally escape from it. Nonetheless, research suggested that not all traumatized children will exhibit dissociative symptoms, and symptoms would vary among individuals [62,63]. Early disruptions in attachment can contribute to dissociation [60,64]. Individuals with pre-existing mental health issues, such as anxiety or depression, may be more susceptible to dissociative symptoms [59], and there may be neurological and genetic factors that contribute to vulnerability [61,65]. Prior research evidenced that TF-CBT is effective in reducing dissociation symptoms in individuals with a history of trauma [20] and that CBT intervention augmented with techniques targeting dissociative symptoms leads to significant improvements in dissociation severity among voice hearers with psychosis and a history of interpersonal trauma [66]. However, the value of app-assisted TF-CBT-based intervention in diminishing dissociation symptoms is not sufficiently explored.

1.5. Emotional States

Another indicator of children’s mental health, including PTSD, is emotional states [67]. Facing stressful challenges without adequate coping mechanisms may increase children’s withdrawal or irritability [58]. Numerous studies evidenced that traumatic experiences may play a role in shaping a child's emotional state, not to mention the impact of illness or hospitalization itself, fatigue, treatment procedures, or physical discomfort [68] and monitoring children's moods and feelings could provide significant information on mental health conditions [69,70]. Previous studies suggested that TF-CBT can be effective in reducing negative moods, as it addresses the intercorrelation of mood, thinking, and behavior, and several studies have proven the efficacy of TF-CBT in treating depression [8,11]. On the whole, CBT is based on the premise that negative thinking contributes to negative moods, and more adaptive ways of thinking can improve emotional states [71]. However, not much is known about the efficacy of app-assisted TF-CBT-based intervention in improving emotional states as compared to treatment-as-usual in psychiatry units.
The purpose of this study was to reveal the efficacy of app-assisted TF-CBT-based intervention as an add-on to inpatient children’s treatment. It was hypothesized that app-assisted TF-CBT-based intervention would significantly reduce post-traumatic stress symptoms, post-traumatic cognitions, negative moods and feelings, and dissociation symptoms of hospitalized children.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. The Sample

The total sample consisted of 20 children hospitalized in the Child Psychiatry Unit at Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, Vilnius, Lithuania. The criteria for the inclusion of participants in biomedical research were the age of the study participants (10-17 years old, as most original research methodologies were developed for children aged 10 and older), and a high probability of PTSD based on a score of the Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen (CATS) results.
The sociodemographic and other characteristics of participants at baseline in TF-CBT and TAU samples are presented in Table 1.
The diagnoses of participants in the TF-CBT and TAU samples are presented in Table 2.

2.2. Instruments

Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen (CATS) was applied to assess children’s traumatic experiences [72,73,74]. CATS measures 1) potentially traumatic events, 2) posttraumatic stress symptoms, and 3) impairment in psychosocial functioning in children and adolescents aged from 7 to 17 years. The potentially traumatic events checklist includes 15 items assessing traumatic experiences. Posttraumatic stress symptoms in the last four weeks are assessed using 20 items rated on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 (“never”) to 3 (“almost always”). Impairment in psychosocial functioning is assessed via five ‘yes’ or ‘no’ items that ask whether the previously rated symptoms interfere with key areas of functioning (getting along with others, school/, hobbies, relationships, and general happiness). Previous studies reported a reliability range between 0.88 and 0.94; the convergent-discriminant validity pattern showed medium to strong correlations with measures of depression and anxiety [73,74,75,76,77].
The Adolescent Dissociative Experience Scale - II (A-DES) assessed dissociative symptoms [63,78]. The 30 items in the A-DES are rated on a scale from 0 (“never”) to 10 (“always”) based on children’s self-report symptoms. The total A-DES score is the mean of the 30-item scores. A-DES has been validated in previous studies and demonstrated high reliability [63,78,79].
Short Moods and Feelings Questionnaire (SMFQ) was utilized to assess children’s moods and feelings [70]. The SMFQ is a short measure of symptoms of depression in children and adolescents and is validated for use in children aged 6 years and up. The self-report version of the SMFQ, used for this study, consists of 13 items measured on a 3-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (“not true”) to 2 (“true”). The SMFQ has been validated with several samples and demonstrated a high reliability of up to 0.91 [69,70,80,81].
PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) was employed to evaluate children’s post-traumatic stress symptoms [82,83,84]. PCL-5 is a 20-item self-report measure that assesses 20 symptoms of PTSD as outlined in the DSM-5, organized into four symptom clusters: ‘Intrusion symptoms’ (items 1–5), ‘Avoidance’ (items 6–7), ‘Negative alterations in cognition and mood’ (items 8–14), and ‘Alterations in arousal and reactivity’ (items 15–20). Respondents indicate how much they were bothered by a symptom on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (“not at all”) to 4 (“extremely”). The probability of PTSD is verified by endorsing symptoms at ‘Moderately’ (2) or above for at least one ‘Intrusion’ and ‘Avoidance’ symptom, and two ‘Negative alterations in cognition and mood’ and ‘Alterations in arousal and reactivity’ symptoms. The validity of the PCL-5 was supported by prior studies which revealed the high reliability of 0.93 of the instruments [82,85,86].
Children's Post-Traumatic Cognitions Inventory (CPTCI) was used to assess children’s cognitions [45]. The CPTCI is a self-report scale with 25 items, which aims at assessing negative posttraumatic appraisals in children and adolescents aged 6 to 17 years old on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (“don’t agree at all”) to 4 (“agree a lot”). The CPTCI includes a belief in “permanent and disturbing change” and a belief in being a “fragile person in a scary world.” Previous studies reported good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α values between .86 and .96) and moderate correlations with measures of depression and post-traumatic symptoms [31,44,45,87,88,89].
Table 3 presents Cronbach’s α and McDonald’s ω values that show the internal consistency regarding the scales used in this study.

2.3. Procedure

The procedure followed the guidelines in the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Lithuanian Vilnius region Biomedical Research Ethics Committee, permission No. 2023/4-1499-963, issued 04/04/2023.
The Children's Psychiatry Department at Santaros Clinics hospitalizes about 100 children annually. To collect the data, hospitalized children, and their parents on the day of hospitalization were asked if they agreed to participate in biomedical research. After providing and signing informed consent, children were interviewed with the help of a mobile application created specifically for research purposes and filled out the questionnaires which took approximately 60 minutes to complete. Out of 41 children assessed, 20 children met the criteria for a high probability of PTSD.
A randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of app-assisted TF-CBT-based intervention. Twenty trauma-exposed children were randomly assigned to either the group which, in addition to TAU treatment, received app-assisted TF-CBT based interventions (TF-CBT group), or the TAU group. Participants completed CATS, A-DES, SMFQ, PCL-5, and CPTCI at baseline and post-treatment. The data was collected from 3rd July 2023 to 28th February 2024.
Each participant in the TAU group during a 21-day treatment period received treatment based on a diagnosis and registered in the clinics with no CBT or mindfulness exercises included. Each participant in app-assisted TF-CBT-based intervention during a 21-day treatment period, in addition to TAU, received 12 sessions including mindfulness exercises facilitated by psychiatrists, with no sessions with caregivers. Overall, 108 sessions (9 participants, 12 sessions) were completed.

2.4. Statistical Analyses

The SPSS (version 29) software and JASP (version 0.16.04.0) software were applied for the statistical analyses. To test the reliability of the instruments, Cronbach’s α and McDonald’s ω were assessed. Next, the normality of data distribution was evaluated (Shapiro-Wilk test, skewness, and kurtosis). Independent samples’ T-test was applied to identify the response in post-traumatic stress symptoms, post-traumatic cognitions, dissociative symptoms, and moods and feelings in the TF-CBT and TAU samples.

3. Results

As demonstrated in Table 4, the Shapiro-Wilk test results were partly significant, but the skewness and kurtosis suggested that the data may be considered normally distributed [90], so the parametric statistics were applied.
The frequencies of experiences of potentially traumatic events in samples are presented in Table 5. In the TF-CBT group, more than 66.6 percent of participants revealed that they were slapped, punched, or beaten up not in their family, 55.5 percent were slapped, punched, or beaten up in their family, and 55.5 percent saw someone being slapped or punched in the community. In the TAU group, 63.6 percent saw someone being slapped or punched in the community, and 55.5 percent were slapped, punched, or beaten up in their family.
The means, standard deviations, and the results of the Independent samples’ T-test in TF-CBT and TAU samples at baseline (pre-treatment) are presented in Table 6.
The Independent samples’ T-test revealed just one significant difference between TF-CBT and TAU samples at baseline (pre-treatment): the TF-CBT sample demonstrated significantly (p=.021) higher scores in negative alterations in cognition and mood (M=18.889, SD=5.207) compared to TAU group (M=11.545, SD=7.647). However, there were no significant differences between the groups in experiencing potentially traumatic events, impairment in psychosocial functioning, posttraumatic stress symptoms, dissociation symptoms, moods and feelings, PTSD checklist, intrusion symptoms, avoidance, alterations in arousal and reactivity, post-traumatic cognitions, belief in “permanent and disturbing change” and “fragile person in a scary world”.
The Independent samples’ T-test in the TF-CBT and TAU samples post-treatment are presented in Table 7.
The Independent samples’ T-test revealed no significant differences between TF-CBT and TAU groups at post-treatment: there were no significant differences in experiencing potentially traumatic events, impairment in psychosocial functioning, posttraumatic stress symptoms, dissociation symptoms, moods and feelings, PTSD checklist, intrusion symptoms, avoidance, negative alterations in cognition and mood alterations in arousal and reactivity, post-traumatic cognitions, belief in “permanent and disturbing change” and “fragile person in a scary world”.
Means, standard deviations, and the results of the T-test comparing TF-CBT at baseline and post-treatment are presented in Table 8.
The Independent samples’ T-test revealed several significant differences in the TF-CBT group's pre-treatment and post-treatment scores. The post-treatment scores were significantly lower in post-traumatic stress symptoms (p=.026), intrusion symptoms (p=.032), alterations in arousal and reactivity (p=.027), overall post-traumatic cognitions (p=.016), and belief in being “a fragile person in a scary world” (p=.008). However, there were no significant differences in the pre-treatment and post-treatment scores in impairment in psychosocial functioning, dissociation symptoms, moods and feelings, avoidance, negative alterations in cognition and mood, and belief in “permanent and disturbing change”.
Means, standard deviations, and the results of the T-test comparing TAU at baseline and post-treatment are presented in Table 9.
The Independent samples’ T-test revealed two significant differences in the TAU group's pre-treatment and post-treatment scores. The post-treatment scores were significantly lower in dissociation symptoms (p=.008), and intrusion symptoms (p=.029). However, there were no significant differences in the pre-treatment and post-treatment scores in post-traumatic stress symptoms, impairment in psychosocial functioning, dissociation symptoms, moods and feelings, avoidance, alterations in cognition and mood, alterations in arousal and reactivity, overall post-traumatic cognitions, belief in being “a fragile person in a scary world”, and belief in “permanent and disturbing change”.
Individual differences in response to treatment in the TF-CBT and TAU groups are presented in Table 10.
The analysis of the individual response to TF-CBT and TAU showed that in the TF-CBT group, there were no improvements in symptoms, moods, and cognitions for patient Nr. 5 (prior diagnoses: severe depressive episode with psychotic symptoms, unspecified as to whether postnatal, F32.30; suicidal ideation, R45.81; dietary counseling and supervision, Z71.3; other negative life events in childhood, Z61.8) and in the TAU group, however, no improvement was observed in symptoms, moods, and cognitions for patient Nr. 11 (other childhood emotional disorders, F93.8) and patient Nr. 12. (other brief psychotic disorder without associated acute stress, F23.80; suicidal ideation, R45.81).

4. Discussion

Numerous studies provided evidence on the efficacy of TF-CBT for children and adolescents [17,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103]. Some studies supported the effectiveness of digital solutions for CBT [104,105,106,107]. This study adds to the research targeting the efficacy of digital solutions for TF-CBT and comparisons between TF-CBT and other interventions [8,108,109,110,111]. The results of this study provide some insights into the effectiveness of TF-CBT compared to Treatment as Usual (TAU) in addressing the mental health of hospitalized children who experienced traumatic events.
In this study, children hospitalized in a psychiatric unit revealed a high prevalence of exposure to traumatic events. In the TF-CBT group, a significant percentage of participants reported experiencing physical violence outside their family (66.6%), within their family (55.5%), and witnessing community violence (55.5%). In the TAU group, a slightly lower percentage observed community violence (63.6%), and a similar percentage experienced violence within their family (55.5%). These statistics underscore the possible impact of traumatic experiences on children’s mental health and the importance of addressing such traumatic experiences in therapeutic interventions. These results relate to previous studies reporting links between exposure to traumatic events and harmful consequences for mental health [112,113].
At the pre-treatment stage, the independent samples' T-test indicated a significant difference between the TF-CBT and TAU groups: the TF-CBT group exhibited significantly higher scores in negative alterations in cognition and mood than the TAU group. However, no significant differences were found between the groups in terms of potentially traumatic events, psychosocial functioning impairment, posttraumatic stress symptoms, dissociation symptoms, moods and feelings, PTSD checklist, intrusion symptoms, avoidance, alterations in arousal and reactivity, post-traumatic cognitions, belief in "permanent and disturbing change," and "fragile person in a scary world". Negative alterations in cognition and mood represent one of the PTSD clusters [114], so it could be presumed that the TF-CBT group participants started with higher levels of PTSD symptoms.
At post-treatment, the independent samples' T-test revealed no significant differences between the TF-CBT and TAU groups. Scores for experiencing potentially traumatic events, impairment in psychosocial functioning, posttraumatic stress symptoms, dissociation symptoms, moods and feelings, PTSD checklist, intrusion symptoms, avoidance, negative alterations in cognition and mood, alterations in arousal and reactivity, post-traumatic cognitions, belief in "permanent and disturbing change," and "fragile person in a scary world" showed no statistically significant variations. Therefore, the findings indicate that app-assisted TF-CBT-based intervention could be effective as suggested by previous research [15,105,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126].
Within the TF-CBT group, there were several significant differences between pre-treatment and post-treatment scores. Post-treatment scores were significantly lower in post-traumatic stress symptoms, intrusion symptoms, alterations in arousal and reactivity, overall post-traumatic cognitions, and belief in being "a fragile person in a scary world". Yet, there were no significant changes in scores for dissociation symptoms, moods and feelings, avoidance, negative alterations in cognition and mood, and belief in "permanent and disturbing change". The findings suggest that employing app-supported TF-CBT intervention, consistent with prior research findings, could reduce post-traumatic stress symptoms [19], intrusion symptoms, alterations in arousal and reactivity, or overall post-traumatic cognitions [127,128].
For the TAU group, the independent samples' T-test revealed two significant differences between pre-treatment and post-treatment scores. Post-treatment scores were notably lower in dissociation symptoms and intrusion symptoms. However, no significant differences were found in post-traumatic stress symptoms, impairment in psychosocial functioning, moods, and feelings, avoidance, alterations in cognition and mood, alterations in arousal and reactivity, overall post-traumatic cognitions, belief in "a fragile person in a scary world," belief in "permanent and disturbing change". The results suggest the added value of the TF-CBT intervention as compared to other treatments in targeting specific symptoms related to traumatic experiences [8,108,109,110].
Therefore, the findings revealed that within the TF-CBT group, significant improvements were observed in post-traumatic stress symptoms, intrusion symptoms, arousal and reactivity, overall post-traumatic cognitions, and belief in being a "fragile person in a scary world." In the TAU group, significant improvements were noted in dissociation and intrusion symptoms post-treatment. While both groups demonstrated improvements, TF-CBT showed specific enhancements in targeted areas, suggesting the efficacy of the intervention in addressing trauma-related symptoms, as suggested by earlier research [129,130].
Upon analyzing individual responses to TF-CBT and TAU, it was observed that for patient Nr. 5 in the TF-CBT group and patients Nr. 11 and Nr. 12 in the TAU group, there were no improvements in symptoms, moods, and cognitions. Patient Nr. 5 had prior diagnoses of severe depressive episodes with psychotic symptoms, unspecified as to whether postnatal (F32.30), suicidal ideation (R45.81), and dietary counseling and supervision (Z71.3), along with other negative life events in childhood (Z61.8). In the TAU group, patient Nr. 11 had other childhood emotional disorders (F93.8), and patient Nr. 12 had other brief psychotic disorder without associated acute stress (F23.80) and suicidal ideation (R45.81). Thus, patient Nr. 5 in the TF-CBT group and patients Nr. 11 and Nr. 12 in the TAU group showed no improvements in symptoms, moods, and cognitions. These results to some extent relate to previous studies on applications of TF-CBT for patients with psychotic symptoms [62,136], suggesting the necessity for future research in this area. Individual differences in response to treatment highlight the complexity of trauma effects and the need for personalized approaches.
In summary, the study suggests that app-assisted TF-CBT-based intervention can be effective in addressing specific trauma-related symptoms, but individual differences in response to treatment should be considered.

Limitations and Future Directions

The main limitation of this study was the sample size. So, it is recommended to replicate the study with much bigger samples. Next, there were no sessions with caregivers, and it is strongly recommended to involve the sessions with them in future research. In addition, controlling other variables that might contribute to the efficacy of the interventions could provide more insights into the applications of interventions. In addition, the findings are specific to the Lithuanian sample and should be regarded cautiously when generalizing the results to other cultural contexts. In conclusion, though this study contributes some insights into the efficacy of app-assisted TF-CBT-based intervention, it highlights the importance of future research.
Based on the findings of this study, it is vital to implement systematic screening procedures for exposure to traumatic events in children admitted to psychiatric units. Early identification of such experiences can facilitate timely interventions and prevent long-term mental health repercussions. Next, healthcare providers should adopt trauma-informed care approaches in therapeutic interventions for children with psychiatric hospitalizations to develop personalized treatment plans.
While TF-CBT showed efficacy in addressing certain post-traumatic symptoms and cognitions, it's essential to recognize that individual differences exist in treatment responses, and treatment plans should be tailored to the specific needs of each child, considering factors such as the severity of trauma exposure and pre-existing cognitive and emotional vulnerabilities.
Next, this study suggests that Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT) can be effective in reducing specific symptoms related to post-traumatic stress, such as intrusion symptoms and alterations in arousal and reactivity, so healthcare facilities should consider integrating TF-CBT into their treatment protocols for children with a history of trauma.
Besides, incorporating technology-assisted interventions, such as app-based support for TF-CBT, can enhance accessibility and engagement in therapeutic interventions, and healthcare providers should explore and utilize technological resources to optimize treatment outcomes for children with trauma-related symptoms.
Moreover, the findings suggest that regular assessment and monitoring of treatment progress are crucial, and healthcare providers should enable timely adjustments to treatment approaches based on individual responses. Collaboration with other support services, such as family therapy, social work, and school-based interventions, and coordinated efforts among multidisciplinary teams can address the complex needs of children with trauma histories more effectively.

5. Conclusions

Firstly, in this study, children hospitalized in a psychiatric unit revealed a high prevalence of exposure to traumatic events. The findings highlight the high prevalence of physical violence, underscoring the possible impact of traumatic interpersonal experiences on children’s mental health and the importance of addressing such experiences by health care providers.
The TF-CBT participants started with higher levels of negative alterations in cognition and mood. At post-treatment, no significant differences were observed between the TF-CBT and TAU groups in impairment in psychosocial functioning, posttraumatic stress symptoms, dissociation symptoms, moods and feelings, PTSD checklist, intrusion symptoms, avoidance, negative alterations in cognition and mood, alterations in arousal and reactivity, post-traumatic cognitions, belief in "permanent and disturbing change," and belief in "fragile person in a scary world”.
Within the TF-CBT group, post-treatment scores were significantly lower in post-traumatic stress symptoms, intrusion symptoms, alterations in arousal and reactivity, overall post-traumatic cognitions, and belief in being "a fragile person in a scary world". Yet, there were no significant changes in scores for impairment in psychosocial functioning, dissociation symptoms, moods and feelings, avoidance, negative alterations in cognition and mood, and belief in "permanent and disturbing change".
Within the TAU group, post-treatment scores were notably lower in dissociation symptoms and intrusion symptoms. However, no significant differences were found in post-traumatic stress symptoms, impairment in psychosocial functioning, moods, and feelings, avoidance, alterations in cognition and mood, alterations in arousal and reactivity, overall post-traumatic cognitions, belief in "a fragile person in a scary world," and belief in "permanent and disturbing change".
In summary, the study suggests that app-assisted TF-CBT-based intervention can be effective in reducing post-traumatic stress symptoms (intrusion symptoms, alterations in arousal and reactivity) and post-traumatic cognitions (namely, belief in being "a fragile person in a scary world"); however, individual differences should be considered.
The findings imply the necessity for screening for traumatic experiences, incorporating trauma-informed care, implementation of TF-CBT into treatment protocols, utilization of app-assisted interventions, tailoring interventions to individual needs, and comprehensive assessment and monitoring of treatment progress.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.D., J.R., and A.P.; methodology, A.D., J.R., and A.P.; software, A.D. and A.V.; validation, A.D., J.R., A.V., I.K., L.J., V.S., M.K., and A.P..; formal analysis, A.D. and A.V.; investigation, A.D., J.R., and A.P.; data curation, A.V.; writing—original draft preparation, A.D.; writing—review and editing, A.D., A.V., J. R., and A.P.; visualization, A.D.; supervision, A.D., J.R., and A.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the 2014-2021 European Economic Area Financial Mechanism Program “Health”, grant number LT03-2-SADM-K01-045.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Vilnius region Biomedical Research Ethics Committee, permission No. 2023/4-1499-963, issued 04/04/2023.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be available upon request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Hitchcock, C.; Goodall, B.; Wright, I.M.; Boyle, A.; Johnston, D.; Dunning, D.; Gillard, J.; Griffiths, K.; Humphrey, A.; McKinnon, A.; et al. The Early Course and Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Very Young Children: Diagnostic Prevalence and Predictors in Hospital-Attending Children and a Randomized Controlled Proof-of-Concept Trial of Trauma-Focused Cognitive Therapy, for 3- to 8-Year-Olds. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2022, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Elliott, R.; McKinnon, A.; Dixon, C.; Boyle, A.; Murphy, F.; Dahm, T.; Travers-Hill, E.; Mul, C.l.; Archibald, S.J.; Smith, P.; et al. Prevalence and Predictive Value of ICD-11 Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Complex PTSD Diagnoses in Children and Adolescents Exposed to a Single-Event Trauma. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2021, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Woolgar, F.; Garfield, H.; Dalgleish, T.; Meiser-Stedman, R. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Prevalence of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Trauma-Exposed Preschool-Aged Children. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2022, 61, 366–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wahab, S.; Yong, L.L.; Chieng, W.K.; Yamil, M.; Sawal, N.A.; Abdullah, N.Q.; Muhdisin Noor, C.R.; Wd Wiredarma, S.M.; Ismail, R.; Othman, A.H.; et al. Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms in Adolescents Exposed to the Earthquake in Lombok, Indonesia: Prevalence and Association With Maladaptive Trauma-Related Cognition and Resilience. Front Psychiatry 2021, 12, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Vibhakar, V.; Allen, L.R.; Gee, B.; Meiser-Stedman, R. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Prevalence of Depression in Children and Adolescents after Exposure to Trauma. J Affect Disord 2019, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Vance, M.C. Handbook of PTSD: Science and Practice. Psychiatry 2023, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kazlauskas, E.; Jovarauskaite, L.; Abe, K.; Brewin, C.R.; Cloitre, M.; Daniunaite, I.; Haramaki, Y.; Hihara, S.; Kairyte, A.; Kamite, Y.; et al. Trauma Exposure and Factors Associated with ICD-11 PTSD and Complex PTSD in Adolescence: A Cross-Cultural Study in Japan and Lithuania. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 2022, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lewey, J.H.; Smith, C.L.; Burcham, B.; Saunders, N.L.; Elfallal, D.; O’Toole, S.K. Comparing the Effectiveness of EMDR and TF-CBT for Children and Adolescents: A Meta-Analysis. J Child Adolesc Trauma 2018, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Thielemann, J.F.B.; Kasparik, B.; König, J.; Unterhitzenberger, J.; Rosner, R. Stability of Treatment Effects and Caregiver-Reported Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis of Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Children and Adolescents. Child Maltreat 2023. [CrossRef]
  10. Sachser, C.; Goldbeck, L. Anxiety, Depression, and Trauma: Transdiagnostic Effectiveness of Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT). Angst, Depression und Trauma-Transdiagnostische Effekte der traumafokussierten kognitiven Verhaltenstherapie (TF-KVT). 2017, 26. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kaminer, D.; Simmons, C.; Seedat, S.; Skavenski, S.; Murray, L.; Kidd, M.; Cohen, J.A. Effectiveness of Abbreviated Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for South African Adolescents: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Eur J Psychotraumatol 2023, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wang, W.; Chen, K.; Zhang, H. Effectiveness of Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Among Maltreated Children: A Meta-Analysis. Res Soc Work Pract 2023, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cohen, J.A.; Mannarino, A.P.; Kliethermes, M.; Murray, L.A. Trauma-Focused CBT for Youth with Complex Trauma. Child Abuse Negl 2012, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Deblinger, E.; Mannarino, A.P.; Cohen, J.A.; Runyon, M.K.; Steer, R.A. Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Children: Impact of the Trauma Narrative and Treatment Length. Depress Anxiety 2011, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Peters, W.; Rice, S.; Cohen, J.; Murray, L.; Schley, C.; Alvarez-Jimenez, M.; Bendall, S. Trauma-Focused Cognitive–Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT) for Interpersonal Trauma in Transitional-Aged Youth. Psychol Trauma 2021, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Harrison, J.P.; Deblinger, E.; Pollio, E.; Cooper, B.; Steer, R.A. TF-CBT Training Augmented with a Self-Care Focus: Understanding Facilitators and Barriers to Treatment Implementation. Community Ment Health J 2023, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Grady, M.D.; Yoder, J.; Deblinger, E.; Mannarino, A.P. Developing a Trauma Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Application for Adolescents with Problematic Sexual Behaviors: A Conceptual Framework. Child Abuse Negl 2023, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Márquez, Y.I.; Deblinger, E.; Dovi, A.T. The Value of Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT) in Addressing the Therapeutic Needs of Trafficked Youth: A Case Study. Cogn Behav Pract 2020, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jensen, T.K.; Braathu, N.; Birkeland, M.S.; Ormhaug, S.M.; Skar, A.M.S. Complex PTSD and Treatment Outcomes in TF-CBT for Youth: A Naturalistic Study. Eur J Psychotraumatol 2022, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Schmidt, C.; Lenz, A.S.; Oliver, M. Effectiveness of TF-CBT with Sex Trafficking Victims in a Secure Post-Adjudication Facility. Journal of Counseling and Development 2022, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Spiegel, J.A.; Graziano, P.A.; Arcia, E.; Cox, S.K.; Ayala, M.; Carnero, N.A.; O’Mara, N.L. Addressing Mental Health and Trauma-Related Needs of Sheltered Children and Families with Trauma-Focused Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT). Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 2022, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Grainger, L.; Thompson, Z.; Morina, N.; Hoppen, T.; Meiser-Stedman, R. Associations between Therapist Factors and Treatment Efficacy in Randomized Controlled Trials of Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Children and Youth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Trauma Stress 2022, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Jensen, T.K.; Holt, T.; Ormhaug, S.M. A Follow-Up Study from a Multisite, Randomized Controlled Trial for Traumatized Children Receiving TF-CBT. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2017, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ford, H.A.; Nangle, D.W. Treatment Guided by an Online Course: A Single Case Evaluation of TF-CBT for an Adolescent with Chronic Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. Clin Case Stud 2015, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Murray, L.K.; Dorsey, S.; Skavenski, S.; Kasoma, M.; Imasiku, M.; Bolton, P.; Bass, J.; Cohen, J.A. Identification, Modification, and Implementation of an Evidence-Based Psychotherapy for Children in a Low-Income Country: The Use of TF-CBT in Zambia. Int J Ment Health Syst 2013, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Gusler, S.; Moreland, A.; de Arellano, M. Implementing Telehealth-Based TF-CBT with Support of Interpretation: A Case Study. Evid Based Pract Child Adolesc Ment Health 2023, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kasparik, B.; Saupe, L.B.; Mäkitalo, S.; Rosner, R. Online Training for Evidence-Based Child Trauma Treatment: Evaluation of the German Language TF-CBT-Web. Eur J Psychotraumatol 2022, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Romney, J.S.; Garcia, M. TF-CBT Informed Teletherapy for Children with Autism and Their Families. J Child Adolesc Trauma 2021, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Martin, A.N.; McLeigh, J.D.; Lamminen, L.M. Examining the Feasibility of Telehealth Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (TF-CBT) with Young People in Foster Care. J Child Adolesc Trauma 2023, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Witt, A.; Öz, Y.; Sachser, C.; Brähler, E.; Glaesmer, H.; Fegert, J.M. Validation and Standardization of the Childhood Trauma Screener (CTS) in the General Population. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health 2022, 16, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lee, H.B.; Shin, K.M.; Chung, Y.K.; Kim, N.; Shin, Y.J.; Chung, U.S.; Bae, S.M.; Hong, M.; Chang, H.Y. Validation of the Child Post-Traumatic Cognitions Inventory in Korean Survivors of Sexual Violence. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health 2018, 12, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ho, G.W.K.; Liu, H.; Karatzias, T.; Hyland, P.; Cloitre, M.; Lueger-Schuster, B.; Brewin, C.R.; Guo, C.; Wang, X.; Shevlin, M. Validation of the International Trauma Questionnaire—Child and Adolescent Version (ITQ-CA) in a Chinese Mental Health Service Seeking Adolescent Sample. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health 2022, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Abraham, E.H.; Antl, S.M.; McAuley, T. Trauma Exposure and Mental Health in a Community Sample of Children and Youth. Psychol Trauma 2021, 14, 624–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. May, C.; Miller, P.E.; Naqvi, M.; Rademacher, E.; Klajn, J.; Hedequist, D.; Shore, B.J. The Incidence of Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms in Children. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2023, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. McGuier, E.A.; Campbell, K.A.; Byrne, K.A.; Shepard, L.D.; Keeshin, B.R. Traumatic Stress Symptoms and PTSD Risk in Children Served by Children’s Advocacy Centers. Front Psychiatry 2023, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hiscox, L.V.; Bray, S.; Fraser, A.; Meiser-Stedman, R.; Seedat, S.; Halligan, S.L. Sex Differences in the Severity and Natural Recovery of Child PTSD Symptoms: A Longitudinal Analysis of Children Exposed to Acute Trauma. Psychol Med 2023, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Stewart, R.W.; Ebesutani, C.; Drescher, C.F.; Young, J. The Child PTSD Symptom Scale: An Investigation of Its Psychometric Properties. J Interpers Violence 2017, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hermosilla, S.; Forthal, S.; Van Husen, M.; Metzler, J.; Ghimire, D.; Ager, A. The Child PTSD Symptom Scale: Psychometric Properties among Earthquake Survivors. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 2021, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Foa, E.B.; Johnson, K.M.; Feeny, N.C.; Treadwell, K.R.H. The Child PTSD Symptom Scale: A Preliminary Examination of Its Psychometric Properties. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology 2001, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Foa, E.B.; Asnaani, A.; Zang, Y.; Capaldi, S.; Yeh, R. Psychometrics of the Child PTSD Symptom Scale for DSM-5 for Trauma-Exposed Children and Adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology 2018, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Serrano-Ibáñez, E.R.; Ruiz-Párraga, G.T.; Esteve, R.; Ramírez-Maestre, C.; López-Martínez, A.E. Validation of the Child PTSD Symptom Scale (CPSS) in Spanish Adolescents. Psicothema 2018, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Betancourt, T.S.; Khan, K.T. The Mental Health of Children Affected by Armed Conflict: Protective Processes and Pathways to Resilience. International Review of Psychiatry 2008, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cohen, J.A.; Deblinger, E.; Mannarino, A.P.; Steer, R.A. A Multisite, Randomized Controlled Trial for Children with Sexual Abuse-Related PTSD Symptoms. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2004, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. McKinnon, A.; Smith, P.; Bryant, R.; Salmon, K.; Yule, W.; Dalgleish, T.; Dixon, C.; Nixon, R.D. V.; Meiser-Stedman, R. An Update on the Clinical Utility of the Children’s Post-Traumatic Cognitions Inventory. J Trauma Stress 2016, 29, 253–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Meiser-Stedman, R.; Smith, P.; Bryant, R.; Salmon, K.; Yule, W.; Dalgleish, T.; Nixon, R.D.V. Development and Validation of the Child Post-Traumatic Cognitions Inventory (CPTCI). J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2009, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Botsford, J.; Steinbrink, M.; Rimane, E.; Rosner, R.; Steil, R.; Renneberg, B. Maladaptive Post-Traumatic Cognitions in Interpersonally Traumatized Adolescents with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: An Analysis of “Stuck-Points. ” Cognit Ther Res 2019, 43, 284–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kangaslampi, S.; Peltonen, K. Changes in Traumatic Memories and Posttraumatic Cognitions Associate with PTSD Symptom Improvement in Treatment of Multiply Traumatized Children and Adolescents. J Child Adolesc Trauma 2020, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pfeiffer, E.; Sachser, C.; de Haan, A.; Tutus, D.; Goldbeck, L. Dysfunctional Posttraumatic Cognitions as a Mediator of Symptom Reduction in Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy with Children and Adolescents: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Behaviour Research and Therapy 2017, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sachser, C.; Rassenhofer, M.; Goldbeck, L. Trauma-Focused Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy with Children and Adolescents: Practice, Evidence Base, and Future Directions. Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother 2016, 44. [Google Scholar]
  50. Tutus, D.; Pfeiffer, E.; Rosner, R.; Sachser, C.; Goldbeck, L. Sustainability of Treatment Effects of Trauma-Focused Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Children and Adolescents: Findings from 6- and 12-Month Follow-Ups. Psychother Psychosom 2017, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. ISRCTN12077707 DECRYPT: Delivery of Cognitive Therapy for Young People after Trauma. https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=ISRCTN12077707 2016.
  52. Bohnacker, I.; Goldbeck, L. Family-Based Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy with Three Siblings of a Refugee Family. Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr 2017, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Knutsen, M.L.; Sachser, C.; Holt, T.; Goldbeck, L.; Jensen, T.K. Trajectories and Possible Predictors of Treatment Outcome for Youth Receiving Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. Psychol Trauma 2020, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Li, J.; Li, J.; Zhang, W.; Wang, G.; Qu, Z. Effectiveness of a School-Based, Lay Counselor-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chinese Children with Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Lancet Reg Health West Pac 2023, 33, 100699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Sachser, C.; Keller, F.; Goldbeck, L. Complex PTSD as Proposed for ICD-11: Validation of a New Disorder in Children and Adolescents and Their Response to Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2017, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Boyd, J.E.; O’Connor, C.; Protopopescu, A.; Jetly, R.; Lanius, R.A.; McKinnon, M.C. The Contributions of Emotion Regulation Difficulties and Dissociative Symptoms to Functional Impairment among Civilian Inpatients with Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms. Psychol Trauma 2020, 12, 739–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Weiss, D.; Lang, F.R. “They” Are Old but “I” Feel Younger: Age-Group Dissociation as a Self-Protective Strategy in Old Age. Psychol Aging 2012, 27, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Secrist, M.E.; Dalenberg, C.J.; Gevirtz, R. Contributing Factors Predicting Nightmares in Children: Trauma, Anxiety, Dissociation, and Emotion Regulation. Psychol Trauma 2019, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Černis, E.; Evans, R.; Ehlers, A.; Freeman, D. Dissociation in Relation to Other Mental Health Conditions: An Exploration Using Network Analysis: Dissociation across Mental Health. J Psychiatr Res 2021, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mertens, Y.L.; Racioppi, A.; Sheinbaum, T.; Kwapil, T.; Barrantes-Vidal, N. Dissociation and Insecure Attachment as Mediators of the Relation between Childhood Emotional Abuse and Nonclinical Paranoid Traits. Eur J Psychotraumatol 2021, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Campbell, M.C.; Smakowski, A.; Rojas-Aguiluz, M.; Goldstein, L.H.; Cardeña, E.; Nicholson, T.R.; Reinders, A.A.T.S.; Pick, S. Dissociation and Its Biological and Clinical Associations in Functional Neurological Disorder: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BJPsych Open 2023, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hagan, M.J.; Hulette, A.C.; Lieberman, A.F. Symptoms of Dissociation in a High-Risk Sample of Young Children Exposed to Interpersonal Trauma: Prevalence, Correlates, and Contributors. J Trauma Stress 2015, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Farrington, A.; Waller, G.; Smerden, J.; Faupel, A.W. The Adolescent Dissociative Experiences Scale: Psychometric Properties and Difference in Scores across Age Groups. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 2001, 189, 722–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Berry, K.; Fleming, P.; Wong, S.; Bucci, S. Associations between Trauma, Dissociation, Adult Attachment and Proneness to Hallucinations. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 2018, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Reinders, A.A.T.S.; Young, A.H.; Veltman, D.J. Biomarkers of Dissociation. BJPsych Open 2023, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Varese, F.; Douglas, M.; Dudley, R.; Bowe, S.; Christodoulides, T.; Common, S.; Grace, T.; Lumley, V.; McCartney, L.; Pace, S.; et al. Targeting Dissociation Using Cognitive Behavioural Therapy in Voice Hearers with Psychosis and a History of Interpersonal Trauma: A Case Series. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice 2021, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Bartels, L.; Skar, A.M.S.; Birkeland, M.S.; Ormhaug, S.M.; Berliner, L.; Jensen, T.K. The Differential Impact of the DSM-5 Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms on Functional Impairment in Traumatized Children and Adolescents. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Rothe, J.; Buse, J.; Uhlmann, A.; Bluschke, A.; Roessner, V. Changes in Emotions and Worries during the Covid-19 Pandemic: An Online-Survey with Children and Adults with and without Mental Health Conditions. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health 2021, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Thabrew, H.; Stasiak, K.; Bavin, L.M.; Frampton, C.; Merry, S. Validation of the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ) and Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (SMFQ) in New Zealand Help-Seeking Adolescents. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2018, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sharp, C.; Goodyer, I.M.; Croudace, T.J. The Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (SMFQ): A Unidimensional Item Response Theory and Categorical Data Factor Analysis of Self-Report Ratings from a Community Sample of 7-through 11-Year-Old Children. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2006, 34, 379–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Dunn, B.D. Augmenting Cognitive Behavioral Therapy to Build Positive Mood in Depression. In The Oxford Handbook of Positive Emotion and Psychopathology; 2019.
  72. International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen (CATS). Istss 2022, 2017.
  73. Dowdy-Hazlett, T.; Killian, M.; Woods, M. Measurement of Traumatic Experiences of Children within Survey and Intervention Research: A Systematic Review of the Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen. Child Youth Serv Rev 2021, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Sachser, C.; Berliner, L.; Holt, T.; Jensen, T.K.; Jungbluth, N.; Risch, E.; Rosner, R.; Goldbeck, L. International Development and Psychometric Properties of the Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen (CATS). J Affect Disord 2017, 210, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Redican, E.; Sachser, C.; Pfeiffer, E.; Martsenkovskyi, D.; Hyland, P.; Karatzias, T.; Shevlin, M. Validation of the Ukrainian Caregiver-Report Version of the Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen (CATS) in Children and Adolescents in Ukraine. Psychol Trauma 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Nilsson, D.; Dävelid, I.; Ledin, S.; Svedin, C.G. Psychometric Properties of the Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen (CATS) in a Sample of Swedish Children. Nord J Psychiatry 2021, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Sachser, C.; Berliner, L.; Risch, E.; Rosner, R.; Birkeland, M.S.; Eilers, R.; Hafstad, G.S.; Pfeiffer, E.; Plener, P.L.; Jensen, T.K. The Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen 2 (CATS-2)–Validation of an Instrument to Measure DSM-5 and ICD-11 PTSD and Complex PTSD in Children and Adolescents. Eur J Psychotraumatol 2022, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Armstrong, J.G.; Putnam, F.W.; Carlson, E.B.; Libero, D.Z.; Smith, S.R. R. Adolescent Dissociative Experiences Scale. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1997, 185, 491–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Martínez-Taboas, A.; Shrout, P.E.; Canino, G.; Chavez, L.M.; Ramírez, R.; Bravo, M.; Bauermeister, J.J.; Ribera, J.C. The Psychometric Properties of a Shortened Version of the Spanish Adolescent Dissociative Experiences Scale. Journal of Trauma and Dissociation 2004, 5, 33–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Espada, J.P.; Gonzálvez, M.T.; Fernández-Martínez, I.; Orgilés, M.; Morales, A. Spanish Validation of the Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (SMFQ) in Children Aged 8-12. Psicothema 2022, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Jarbin, H.; Ivarsson, T.; Andersson, M.; Bergman, H.; Skarphedinsson, G. Screening Efficiency of the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ) and Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (SMFQ) in Swedish Help Seeking Outpatients. PLoS ONE 2020, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Blevins, C.A.; Weathers, F.W.; Davis, M.T.; Witte, T.K.; Domino, J.L. The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation. J Trauma Stress 2015, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. National Center for PTSD Using the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) Www. Ptsd.va.Gov. 2018, 5.
  84. Weathers, F.W.; Litz, B.T.; Keane, T.M.; Palmieri, P.A.; Marx, B.P.; Schnurr, P.P. The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) – Standard [Measurement Instrument]. National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder-Ptsd 2013, 5.
  85. Stanley, I.H.; Tock, J.L.; Boffa, J.W.; Hom, M.A.; Joiner, T.E. Psychometric Properties of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) Anchored to One’s Own Suicide Attempt. Psychol Trauma 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Zuromski, K.L.; Ustun, B.; Hwang, I.; Keane, T.M.; Marx, B.P.; Stein, M.B.; Ursano, R.J.; Kessler, R.C. Developing an Optimal Short-Form of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Depress Anxiety 2019, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Lobo, B.O.M.; Brunnet, A.E.; Ecker, K.K.; Schaefer, L.S.; Arteche, A.X.; Gauer, G.; Kristensen, C.H. Psychometric Properties of the Child Posttraumatic Cognitions Inventory in a Sample of Brazilian Children. J Aggress Maltreat Trauma 2015, 24, 863–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. McKinnon, A.; Smith, P.; Bryant, R.; Salmon, K.; Yule, W.; Dalgleish, T.; Dixon, C.; Nixon, R.D.V.; Meiser-Stedman, R. An Update on the Clinical Utility of the Children’s Post-Traumatic Cognitions Inventory. J Trauma Stress 2016, 29, 253–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. de Haan, A.; Petermann, F.; Meiser-Stedman, R.; Goldbeck, L. Psychometric Properties of the German Version of the Child Post-Traumatic Cognitions Inventory (CPTCI-GER). Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 2016, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. George, D.; Malley, P. IBM SPSS Statistics 27; 2019; ISBN 9781351033909.
  91. Stewart, R.W.; Orengo-Aguayo, R.; Villalobos, B.T.; Nicasio, A.V.; Dueweke, A.R.; Alto, M.; Cohen, J.A.; Mannarino, A.P.; de Arellano, M.A. Implementation of an Evidence-Based Psychotherapy for Trauma-Exposed Children in a Lower-Middle Income Country: The Use of Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in El Salvador. J Child Adolesc Trauma 2021, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Kameoka, S.; Tanaka, E.; Yamamoto, S.; Saito, A.; Narisawa, T.; Arai, Y.; Nosaka, S.; Ichikawa, K.; Asukai, N. Effectiveness of Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Japanese Children and Adolescents in Community Settings: A Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial. Eur J Psychotraumatol 2020, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Kusasira-Sutton, A. Understanding Child Abuse Victim, Caregiver and Clinician Trauma Focused Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (TF-CBT) Treatment Experience. Rangahau Aranga: AUT Graduate Review 2022, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Van Steensel, F.J.A.; Bögels, S.M. CBT for Anxiety Disorders in Children with and without Autism Spectrum Disorders. J Consult Clin Psychol 2015, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Oberg, C.; Sharma, H. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Unaccompanied Refugee Minors: Prevalence, Contributing and Protective Factors, and Effective Interventions: A Scoping Review. Children 2023, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Last, B.S.; Johnson, C.; Dallard, N.; Fernandez-Marcote, S.; Zinny, A.; Jackson, K.; Cliggitt, L.; Rudd, B.N.; Mills, C.; Beidas, R.S. Implementing Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Philadelphia: A 10-Year Evaluation. Implement Res Pract 2023, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Palfrey, N.; Ryan, R.; Reay, R.E. Implementation of Trauma-Specific Interventions in a Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service. J Child Fam Stud 2023, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Melegkovits, E.; Blumberg, J.; Dixon, E.; Ehntholt, K.; Gillard, J.; Kayal, H.; Kember, T.; Ottisova, L.; Walsh, E.; Wood, M.; et al. The Effectiveness of Trauma-Focused Psychotherapy for Complex Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: A Retrospective Study. European Psychiatry 2023, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wamser-Nanney, R.; Walker, H.E. Attrition from Pediatric Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Meta-Analysis. J Trauma Stress 2023, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Esterer, M.; Carlson, J.S.; Roschmann, S.; Kim, H.D.; Cowper, A.; Cranmer-Fosdick, H.; Ludtke, M.; DeCicco, B. Exploring Early Termination Patterns and Effectiveness of Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Children in Foster Care. Child Youth Serv Rev 2023, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Murray, L.K.; Skavenski, S.; Kane, J.C.; Mayeya, J.; Dorsey, S.; Cohen, J.A.; Michalopoulos, L.T.M.; Imasiku, M.; Bolton, P.A. Effectiveness of Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy among Trauma-Affected Children in Lusaka, Zambia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr 2015, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. De Arellano, M.A.R.; Lyman, R.; Jobe-Shields, L.; George, P.; Dougherty, R.H.; Daniels, A.S.; Ghose, S.S.; Huang, L.; Delphin-Rittmon, M.E. Trauma-Focused Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Children and Adolescents: Assessing the Evidence. Psychiatric Services 2014, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Stephen Lenz, A.; Michelle Hollenbaugh, K. Meta-Analysis of Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Treating PTSD and Co-Occurring Depression among Children and Adolescents. Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation 2015, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Podina, I.R.; Mogoase, C.; David, D.; Szentagotai, A.; Dobrean, A. A Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy of Technology Mediated CBT for Anxious Children and Adolescents. Journal of Rational - Emotive and Cognitive - Behavior Therapy 2016, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Simon, N.; Lewis, C.E.; Smallman, K.; Brookes-Howell, L.; Roberts, N.P.; Kitchiner, N.J.; Ariti, C.; Nollett, C.; McNamara, R.; Bisson, J.I. The Acceptability of a Guided Internet-Based Trauma-Focused Self-Help Programme (Spring) for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Eur J Psychotraumatol 2023, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Lewis, C.; Bailey, L.; Ariti, C.; Kitchiner, N.J.; Roberts, N.P.; Simon, N.; Bisson, J.I. Social Support as a Predictor of Outcomes of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy with a Trauma Focus Delivered Face-to-Face and via Guided Internet-Based Self-Help. J Trauma Stress 2023, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Bisson, J.I.; Ariti, C.; Cullen, K.; Kitchiner, N.; Lewis, C.; Roberts, N.P.; Simon, N.; Smallman, K.; Addison, K.; Bell, V.; et al. Guided, Internet Based, Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: Pragmatic, Multicentre, Randomised Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial (RAPID). The BMJ 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Jensen, T.K.; Holt, T.; Ormhaug, S.M.; Egeland, K.; Granly, L.; Hoaas, L.C.; Hukkelberg, S.S.; Indregard, T.; Stormyren, S.D.; Wentzel-Larsen, T. A Randomized Effectiveness Study Comparing Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy With Therapy as Usual for Youth. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology 2014, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Hultmann, O.; Broberg, A.G.; Axberg, U. A Randomized Controlled Study of Trauma Focused Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Compared to Enhanced Treatment as Usual with Patients in Child Mental Health Care Traumatized from Family Violence. Child Youth Serv Rev 2023, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Lee, P.; Lang, J.M. Comparing Trauma-Focused Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy to Commonly Used Treatments in Usual Care for Children with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. Psychol Trauma 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Xiang, Y.; Cipriani, A.; Teng, T.; Del Giovane, C.; Zhang, Y.; Weisz, J.R.; Li, X.; Cuijpers, P.; Liu, X.; Barth, J.; et al. Comparative Efficacy and Acceptability of Psychotherapies for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Evidence Based Mental Health 2021, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Kvedaraite, M.; Zelviene, P.; Elklit, A.; Kazlauskas, E. The Role of Traumatic Experiences and Posttraumatic Stress on Social Anxiety in a Youth Sample in Lithuania. Psychiatric Quarterly 2020, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Kazlauskas, E.; Zelviene, P.; Daniunaite, I.; Hyland, P.; Kvedaraite, M.; Shevlin, M.; Cloitre, M. The Structure of ICD-11 PTSD and Complex PTSD in Adolescents Exposed to Potentially Traumatic Experiences. J Affect Disord 2020, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Ennis, C.R.; Tock, J.L.; Daurio, A.M.; Raines, A.M.; Taylor, J. An Initial Investigation of the Association Between DSM–5 Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms and Nonsuicidal Self-Injury Functions. Psychol Trauma 2022, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Li, J.; Li, J.; Yuan, L.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, W.; Qu, Z. Cultural Adaptation of Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Trauma-Affected Children in China. Psychol Trauma 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Chipalo, E. Is Trauma Focused-Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT) Effective in Reducing Trauma Symptoms among Traumatized Refugee Children? A Systematic Review. J Child Adolesc Trauma 2021, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Mohajerin, B.; Lynn, S.J.; Cassiello-Robbins, C. Unified Protocol vs Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Among Adolescents With PTSD. Behav Ther 2023, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Unterhitzenberger, J.; Eberle-Sejari, R.; Rassenhofer, M.; Sukale, T.; Rosner, R.; Goldbeck, L. Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy with Unaccompanied Refugee Minors: A Case Series. BMC Psychiatry 2015, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Konanur, S.; Muller, R.T.; Cinamon, J.S.; Thornback, K.; Zorzella, K.P.M. Effectiveness of Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in a Community-Based Program. Child Abuse Negl 2015, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Ovenstad, K.S.; Ormhaug, S.M.; Jensen, T.K. The Relationship between Youth Involvement, Alliance and Outcome in Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. Psychotherapy Research 2023, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Thielemann, J.F.B.; Kasparik, B.; König, J.; Unterhitzenberger, J.; Rosner, R. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Children and Adolescents. Child Abuse Negl 2022, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Unterhitzenberger, J.; Wintersohl, S.; Lang, M.; König, J.; Rosner, R. Providing Manualized Individual Trauma-Focused CBT to Unaccompanied Refugee Minors with Uncertain Residence Status: A Pilot Study. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health 2019, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Thomas, F.C.; Puente-Duran, S.; Mutschler, C.; Monson, C.M. Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Children and Youth in Low and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review. Child Adolesc Ment Health 2022, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Unterhitzenberger, J.; Haberstumpf, S.; Rosner, R.; Pfeiffer, E. “same Same or Adapted?” Therapists’ Feedback on the Implementation of Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy with Unaccompanied Young Refugees. Clinical Psychology in Europe 2021, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Connors, E.H.; Prout, J.; Vivrette, R.; Padden, J.; Lever, N. Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in 13 Urban Public Schools: Mixed Methods Results of Barriers, Facilitators, and Implementation Outcomes. School Ment Health 2021, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Peters, W.; Rice, S.; Cohen, J.; Smith, N.B.; McDonnell, C.G.; Winch, A.; Nicasio, A.V.; Zeifman, R.J.; Alvarez-Jimenez, M.; Bendall, S. Subjective Distress, Self-Harm, and Suicidal Ideation or Behavior Throughout Trauma-Focused Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Transitional Age Youth. Psychol Trauma 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Knutsen, M.L.; Czajkowski, N.O.; Ormhaug, S.M. Changes in Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms, Cognitions, and Depression during Treatment of Traumatized Youth. Behaviour Research and Therapy 2018, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Jensen, T.K.; Holt, T.; Ormhaug, S.M.; Fjermestad, K.W.; Wentzel-Larsen, T. Change in Post-Traumatic Cognitions Mediates Treatment Effects for Traumatized Youth-A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Couns Psychol 2018, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. McGuire, A.; Steele, R.G.; Singh, M.N. Systematic Review on the Application of Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT) for Preschool-Aged Children. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 2021, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Ehlers, A.; Steil, R. Maintenance of Intrusive Memories in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Cognitive Approach. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 1995, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Characteristics of participants at baseline in clinical and non-clinical samples.
Table 1. Characteristics of participants at baseline in clinical and non-clinical samples.
Baseline characteristic TF-CBT sample (n = 9) TAU sample (n = 11)
n % n %
Gender
  Female 8 88.9 4 40
  Male 1 11.1 6 60
Prefer not to answer - - 1 10
M SD M SD
Age 13.111 1.167 12.600 2.503
  Female 13.250 1.165 14.000 3.162
  Male 12.000 - 11.667 1.633
Prefer not to answer - - n = 1 -
Note. M = Mean; SD = standard deviation.
Table 2. Diagnoses of participants in the TF-CBT and TAU samples.
Table 2. Diagnoses of participants in the TF-CBT and TAU samples.
ID Code Full Diagnosis based on the ICD-10
TF-CBT sample
1 XTRAblosx Childhood autism (F84.0) and Mixed disorder of scholastic skills (F81.3).
2 XTRAczicj Moderate depressive episode without somatic symptoms (F32.10), Suicidal thoughts, Suicidal ideation (R45.81), Personal history of self-harm (Z91.5).
3 XTRAdfams Other childhood emotional disorders (F93.8), Other specified problems related to primary support group (Z63.8), Other negative life events in childhood (Z61.8).
4 XTRAglnam Moderate depressive episode without somatic symptoms (F32.10), Suicidal ideation (R45.81), Personal history of self-harm (Z91.5), Other negative life events in childhood (Z61.8).
5 XTRAjfqpg Severe depressive episode with psychotic symptoms, unspecified as to whether postnatal (F32.30), Suicidal ideation (R45.81), Dietary counseling and supervision (Z71.3), Other negative life events in childhood (Z61.8).
6 XTRAjqhdd Other childhood emotional disorders (F93.8), Other conduct disorders (F91.8), Mixed disorder of scholastic skills (F81.3), Dietary counseling and supervision (Z71.3), Personal history of self-harm (Z91.5).
7 XTRAnkdom Other childhood emotional disorders (F93.8), Accentuation of personality traits (Z73.1), Suicidal ideation (R45.81), Personal history of self-harm (Z91.5), Other specified problems related to primary support group (Z63.8).
8 XTRAtfaqb Depressive conduct disorder (F92.0), Mixed disorder of scholastic skills (F81.3), Other negative life events in childhood (Z61.8), Other specified problems related to upbringing (Z62.8), Feeding difficulties (R63.3).
9 XTRAtnhfm Other childhood emotional disorders (F93.8), Accentuation of personality traits (Z73.1), Suicidal ideation (R45.81), Personal history of self-harm (Z91.5), Problems related to alleged sexual abuse of a child by a person within the primary support group (Z61.4), Other negative life events in childhood (Z61.8).
TAU sample
10 XTRAapxdf Other childhood emotional disorders (F93.8).
11 XTRAhewup Other childhood emotional disorders (F93.8).
12 XTRAhfjrp Other brief psychotic disorder without associated acute stress (F23.80), Suicidal ideation (R45.81).
13 XTRAjaqko Childhood autism (F84.0), Other conduct disorders (F91.8), Transient tic disorder (F95.0), Inorganic sleep-wake rhythm disorder (F51.2).
14 XTRAmdqlq Other childhood emotional disorders (F93.8), Other conduct disorders (F91.8), Mixed disorder of scholastic skills (F81.3), Other specified problems related to upbringing (Z62.8), Other negative life events in childhood (Z61.8).
15 XTRAqipcw Atypical anorexia nervosa (F50.1), Moderate depressive episode without somatic symptoms (F32.10), Suicidal ideation (R45.81), Personal history of self-harm (Z91.5).
16 XTRAqxrur Other childhood emotional disorders (F93.8), Mixed disorder of scholastic skills (F81.3), Other specified problems related to primary support group (Z63.8).
17 XTRAsyfmo Moderate depressive episode without somatic symptoms (F32.10), Suicidal ideation (R45.81), Other negative life events in childhood (Z61.8).
18 XTRAwjrxf Other childhood emotional disorders (F93.8), Asperger's Syndrome (F84.5).
19 XTRAzdixe Moderate depressive episode without somatic symptoms (F32.10), Atypical anorexia nervosa (F50.1), Suicidal ideation (R45.81), Personal history of self-harm (Z91.5), Other negative life events in childhood (Z61.8).
20 XTRAzjxvw Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, predominantly inattentive type (F90.0), Mixed disorder of scholastic skills (F81.3), Other negative life events in childhood (Z61.8).
Table 3. Cronbach’s α and McDonald’s ω values of the scales used in the study.
Table 3. Cronbach’s α and McDonald’s ω values of the scales used in the study.
Scales Variables Pre-treatment Post-treatment
Cronbach’s α McDonald’s ω Cronbach’s α McDonald’s ω
CATS Posttraumatic stress symptoms .909 .901 .957 .956
A-DES Dissociation symptoms, overall .933 .926 .977 .978
SMFQ Moods and feelings, overall .930 .929 .926 .928
PCL-5 PTSD Checklist, overall .927 .922 .960 .959
Intrusion symptoms .827 .824 .878 .895
Avoidance .700 .699 .910 .910
Negative alterations in cognition and mood .779 .811 .898 .907
Alterations in arousal and reactivity .834 .834 .912 .915
CPTCI Post-Traumatic Cognitions, overall .958 .957 .967 .966
Permanent and disturbing change .932 .930 .960 .960
Fragile person in a scary world .900 .894 .910 .906
Table 4. Data distribution in the samples.
Table 4. Data distribution in the samples.
Scales Variables Pre-treatment Post-treatment
TF-CBT Sample TAU Sample TF-CBT Sample TAU Sample
W S K W S K W S K W S K
CATS Posttraumatic stress symptoms .945 .450 -1.023 .934 -.533 -.660 .944 -.406 -1.583 .919 .538 -.494
Impairment in psychosocial functioning .853 -.362 -1.826 .852* .249 -1.220 .868 .214 -1.954 .882 -.532 -1.241
A-DES Dissociation symptoms, overall .952 .808 .591 .957 .238 -.662 .935 .524 -.285 .753** 1.603 1.459
SMFQ Moods and feelings, overall .928 -.763 -.455 .910 -.085 -1.545 .888 -.192 -1.783 .977 -.156 .225
PCL-5 PTSD Checklist .972 -.556 -.091 .920 .218 -1.475 .984 -.382 .621 .830* .111 -2.214
Intrusion symptoms .920 -.049 -1.591 .883 .338 -1.463 .907 -.322 -.960 .818* .220 -2.124
Avoidance .896 .824 -.216 .886 .302 -1.593 .898 -.104 -1.828 .826* .578 -1.493
Negative alterations .959 -.493 .461 .915 .327 -.904 .960 -.625 .234 .854* .265 -1.923
Alterations in arousal and reactivity .916 .518 -1.041 .904 -.106 -1.663 .957 -.218 -.363 .892 .212 -1.698
CPTCI Post-Traumatic Cognitions, overall .931 -.526 -.924 .923 .396 -1.316 .928 -.377 -1.402 .938 .529 -0.829
Permanent and disturbing change .913 -.314 -1.151 .877 .635 -1.089 .877 -.168 -2.041 .873 .662 -0.977
Fragile person in a scary world .945 -.182 -.952 .954 -.051 -1.292 .931 -.967 .620 .972 .459 -.309
Note. W = Shapiro-Wilk test; S = skewness; K = kurtosis; * p < .05, ** p < .01.
Table 5. The frequencies of experiences of potentially traumatic events in TF-CBT and TAU samples.
Table 5. The frequencies of experiences of potentially traumatic events in TF-CBT and TAU samples.
Potentially traumatic events TF-CBT sample (n = 9) TAU sample (n = 11)
n (yes) % n (yes) %
1. Serious natural disasters like a flood, hurricanes, earthquakes, or fires. 4 44.4 3 27.3
2. Serious accident or injury like a car/bike crash, dog bite, sports injury. 2 22.2 5 45.5
3. Robbed by threat, force, or weapon. 1 11.1 1 9.1
4. Slapped, punched, or beat up in your family. 5 55.5 6 55.5
5. Slapped, punched, or beaten up by someone not in your family. 6 66.6 4 36.4
6. Seeing someone in your family get slapped, punched, or beat up. 4 44.4 5 45.5
7. Seeing someone in the community get slapped or punched. 5 55.5 7 63.6
8. Someone older touching your private parts when they shouldn’t. 3 33.3 2 18.2
9. Someone forcing or pressuring sex, or when you couldn’t say no. 0 0 0 0
10. Someone close to you dies suddenly or violently. 4 44.4 3 27.3
11. Attacked, stabbed, shot at, or hurt badly. 1 11.1 1 9.1
12. Seeing someone attacked, stabbed, shot at, hurt badly, or killed 1 11.1 1 9.1
13. Stressful or scary medical procedure. 3 33.3 3 27.3
14. Being around war. 0 0 0 0
15. Other stressful or scary events. 4 44.4 4 36.4
Table 6. Means, standard deviations, and the results of the T-test comparing TF-CBT and TAU samples at baseline (pre-treatment).
Table 6. Means, standard deviations, and the results of the T-test comparing TF-CBT and TAU samples at baseline (pre-treatment).
Variables TF-CBT Sample TAU sample Mean differ. t (df) p Cohen’s d
M SD M SD
Potentially traumatic events 4.778 3.701 4.091 2.844 0.687 0.457(14.831) .654 0.208
Impairment in psychosocial functioning 3.000 2.000 2.364 1.963 0.636 0.714(17.089) .485 0.321
Posttraumatic stress symptoms 33.333 10.794 27.500 15.407 5.833 0.963(16.104) .350 0.439
Dissociation symptoms 3.734 2.290 4.228 2.030 -0.494 -0.505(16.225) .621 -0.228
Moods and feelings, overall 17.556 6.327 12.455 8.454 5.101 1.542(17.895) .141 0.683
PTSD, overall 45.444 11.770 32.100 22.786 13.344 1.626(13.766) .127 0.736
Intrusion symptoms 9.889 3.790 7.727 6.987 2.162 0.880(15.912) .392 0.385
Avoidance 3.667 2.449 3.273 3.003 0.394 0.323(17.999) .750 0.144
Negative alterations in cognition and mood 18.889 5.207 11.545 7.647 7.343 2.545(17.514) .021 1.123
Alterations in arousal and reactivity 13.000 4.062 8.200 6.215 4.800 2.011(15.614) .062 0.914
Post-Traumatic Cognitions, overall 70.222 15.802 54.000 23.367 16.222 1.788(15.863) .093 0.813
Permanent and disturbing change 34.556 9.289 26.700 12.910 7.856 1.533(16.274) .144 0.699
Fragile person in a scary world 35.667 7.297 27.545 10.425 8.121 2.043(17.651) .056 0.903
Note. M = Mean; SD = standard deviation; Welch’s T-test has been used.
Table 7. Means, standard deviations, and the results of the T-test comparing TF-CBT and TAU samples post-treatment.
Table 7. Means, standard deviations, and the results of the T-test comparing TF-CBT and TAU samples post-treatment.
Variables TF-CBT Sample TAU sample Mean differ. t (df) p Cohen’s d
M SD M SD
Potentially traumatic events 4.000 4.301 5.727 4.407 -1.727 -0.884(17.384) .389 -0.397
Impairment in psychosocial functioning 2.500 2.000 3.091 1.814 -0.591 -0.661(14.299) .519 -0.309
Posttraumatic stress symptoms 24.714 13.475 23.091 17.975 1.623 0.218(15.419) .830 0.102
Dissociation symptoms, overall 3.683 2.986 2.885 2.192 0.798 0.632(12.525) .539 0.305
Moods and feelings, overall 16.444 8.141 10.700 5.982 5.744 1.737(14.600) .104 0.804
PTSD, overall 36.125 19.090 27.600 24.126 8.525 0.837(16.000) .415 0.392
Intrusion symptoms 7.000 4.840 6.20 6.477 0.800 0.300(15.955) .768 0.140
Avoidance 4.000 3.207 3.091 3.300 0.909 0.600(15.578) .557 0.278
Negative alterations in cognition and mood 15.750 8.102 8.909 8.264 6.841 1.802(15.420) .091 0.836
Alterations in arousal and reactivity 9.375 5.655 8.091 6.891 1.284 0.445(16.672) .662 0.204
Post-Traumatic Cognitions, overall 58.750 21.097 50.800 21.478 7.950 0.788(15.261) .443 0.373
Permanent and disturbing change 29.250 13.392 23.700 10.552 5.550 0.958(13.156) .355 0.460
Fragile person in a scary world 29.500 8.767 26.727 10.669 2.773 0.621(16.666) .543 0.284
Note. M = Mean; SD = standard deviation; Welch’s T-test has been used.
Table 8. Means, standard deviations, and the results of T-test comparing TF-CBT at baseline and post-treatment.
Table 8. Means, standard deviations, and the results of T-test comparing TF-CBT at baseline and post-treatment.
Variable TF-CBT Pre-treatment TF-CBT Post-treatment Mean differ. t(df) p Cohen’s d
M SD M SD
Impairment in psychosocial functioning 2.875 2.100 2.500 2.000 0.375 1.158(7) .285 0.409
Posttraumatic stress symptoms 35.714 10.828 24.714 13.475 11.000 2.034(6) .088 0.769
Dissociation symptoms, overall 3.884 2.401 3.683 2.986 0.201 0.343(7) .742 0.121
Moods and feelings, overall 17.556 6.327 16.444 8.141 1.111 0.445(8) .668 0.148
PTSD, overall 45.250 12.567 36.125 19.090 9.125 2.819(7) .026 0.997
Intrusion symptoms 9.250 3.495 7.000 4.840 2.250 2.679(7) .032 0.947
Avoidance 4.000 2.390 4.000 3.207 0.000 0.000(7) 1.000 0.000
Negative alterations in cogn. and mood 18.625 5.502 15.750 8.102 2.875 1.910(7) .098 0.675
Alterations in arousal and reactivity 13.375 4.173 9.375 5.655 4.000 2.779(7) .027 0.983
Post-Traumatic Cognitions, overall 68.750 16.219 58.750 21.097 10.000 3.179(7) .016 1.124
Permanent and disturbing change 33.375 9.180 29.250 13.392 4.125 1.477(7) .183 0.522
Fragile person in a scary world 35.375 7.745 29.500 8.767 5.875 3.678(7) .008 1.300
Note. M = Mean; SD = standard deviation; Welch’s T-test has been used.
Table 9. Means, standard deviations, and the results of the T-test comparing TAU at baseline and post-treatment.
Table 9. Means, standard deviations, and the results of the T-test comparing TAU at baseline and post-treatment.
Variable TAU Pre-treatment TAU Post-treatment Mean differ. t(df) p Cohen’s d
M SD M SD
Impairment in psychosocial functioning 2.364 1.963 3.091 1.814 -0.727 -1.056(10) .316 -0.318
Posttraumatic stress symptoms 27.500 15.407 22.500 18.834 5.000 1.285(9) .231 0.406
Dissociation symptoms, overall 4.011 2.000 2.885 2.192 1.126 3.370(9) .008 1.066
Moods and feelings, overall 12.400 8.909 10.700 5.982 1.700 1.004(9) .342 0.317
PTSD, overall 33.444 23.744 30.000 24.290 3.444 1.348(8) .215 0.449
Intrusion symptoms 8.000 7.303 6.200 6.477 1.800 2.586(9) .029 0.818
Avoidance 3.273 3.003 3.091 3.330 0.182 0.482(10) .640 0.145
Negative alterations in cognition and mood 11.545 7.647 8.909 8.264 2.636 1.943(10) .081 0.586
Alterations in arousal and reactivity 8.200 6.215 8.500 7.122 -0.300 -0.226(9) .826 -0.072
Post-Traumatic Cognitions, overall 54.000 23.367 50.800 21.478 3.200 1.530(9) .160 0.484
Permanent and disturbing change 26.700 12.910 23.700 10.552 3.000 2.076(9) .068 0.656
Fragile person in a scary world 27.545 10.425 26.727 10.669 0.818 0.697(10) .502 0.210
Note. M = Mean; SD = standard deviation; Welch’s T-test has been used.
Table 10. Individual differences in response to treatment (dissociation, intrusion, alterations in arousal and reactivity, moods and feelings, post-traumatic cognitions, “fragile person in a scary world”) in the TF-CBT and TAU groups at baseline (Pre) and post-treatment (Post).
Table 10. Individual differences in response to treatment (dissociation, intrusion, alterations in arousal and reactivity, moods and feelings, post-traumatic cognitions, “fragile person in a scary world”) in the TF-CBT and TAU groups at baseline (Pre) and post-treatment (Post).
ID Gender Age Alterations in arousal and reactivity Intrusion Dissociation Moods and feelings Post-traumatic cognitions “Fragile person in a scary world”
TF-CBT sample Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post
1 F 13.00 4.00 1.00 2.00 .00 4.30 5.03 6.00 6.00 62.00 58.00 32.00 32.00
2 F 12.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 .00 2.20 .50 25.00 6.00 66.00 42.00 33.00 29.00
3 F 12.00 5.00 5.00 2.00 3.00 8.21 5.73 21.00 19.00 77.00 73.00 44.00 34.00
4 F 14.00 4.00 .00 5.00 .00 2.53 - 20.00 20.00 82.00 - 38.00 -
5 F 15.00 3.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 5.93 8.97 22.00 23.00 83.00 83.00 38.00 37.00
6 F 12.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 4.00 3.53 3.20 11.00 9.00 45.00 39.00 25.00 21.00
7 F 14.00 5.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 4.30 4.50 23.00 26.00 91.00 81.00 46.00 40.00
8 M 12.00 4.00 .00 1.00 .00 .67 .30 17.00 26.00 49.00 26.00 26.00 13.00
9 F 14.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 4.00 1.93 1.23 13.00 13.00 77.00 68.00 39.00 30.00
TAU sample
10 2.00 5.00 3.00 1.00 3.93 2.60 22.00 13.00 55.00 53.00 29.00 28.00
11 F 10.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 6.40 - 20.00 21.00 87.00 89.00 40.00 47.00
12 M 14.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 6.47 6.17 11.00 11.00 62.00 65.00 35.00 36.00
13 M 13.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.60 1.80 .00 .00 25.00 26.00 12.00 12.00
14 M 10.00 3.00 2.00 .00 .00 3.97 1.17 5.00 6.00 45.00 37.00 21.00 22.00
15 F 13.00 1.00 1.00 .00 .00 1.23 1.37 6.00 13.00 30.00 33.00 16.00 18.00
16 M 11.00 .00 .00 2.00 .00 3.31 2.17 13.00 9.00 33.00 27.00 16.00 14.00
17 F 16.00 3.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.77 1.77 23.00 16.00 74.00 60.00 36.00 31.00
18 M 12.00 4.00 2.00 .00 .00 3.00 1.33 2.00 5.00 40.00 42.00 25.00 25.00
19 F 17.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.13 2.93 22.00 13.00 89.00 76.00 43.00 38.00
20 M 10.00 1.00 .00 2.00 1.00 7.70 7.55 13.00 - 62.00 - 30.00 23.00
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated