Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Acarological Risk of Infection With Borrelia burgdorferi, the Lyme Disease Agent, in Staten Island, New York City

Version 1 : Received: 21 March 2024 / Approved: 22 March 2024 / Online: 25 March 2024 (07:31:57 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Zhou, L.; Tsynman, L.; Kanapathipillai, K.; Shah, Z.; Bajwa, W. Acarological Risk of Infection with Borrelia burgdorferi, the Lyme Disease Agent, in Staten Island, New York City. Arthropoda 2024, 2, 181-191. Zhou, L.; Tsynman, L.; Kanapathipillai, K.; Shah, Z.; Bajwa, W. Acarological Risk of Infection with Borrelia burgdorferi, the Lyme Disease Agent, in Staten Island, New York City. Arthropoda 2024, 2, 181-191.

Abstract

Lyme disease, the leading vector-borne ailment in the U.S., annually affects an estimated 476,000 individuals, predominantly in the Northeast and Upper Midwest. Despite its increasing incidence, the evaluation of risk within U.S. cities, including natural public lands, remains inadequate. This study focuses on blacklegged tick occurrences and Borrelia burgdorferi infection prevalence in 24 Staten Island parks, aiming to assess Lyme disease exposure risk. Monthly acarological risk index (ARI) calculations from 2019 to 2022 revealed elevated values (0.16-0.53) in specific parks, notably Wolfe’s Pond Park, High Rock Park, Clay Pit Pond Park, Clove Lake Park, and Fair View Park. June (0.36) and November (0.21) consistently exhibited heightened ARIs, aligning with peak tick collection months. Despite stable yearly infection rates at 28.97%, tick densities varied significantly between parks and years. Identifying a high transmission risk in specific parks in Staten Island, a highly urbanized part of New York City, emphasizes the continuous necessity for Lyme disease risk management, even within the greenspaces of large cities.

Keywords

Lyme disease; Ixodes scapularis; urban green spaces; public health risk

Subject

Public Health and Healthcare, Public, Environmental and Occupational Health

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.