Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Recognition and Development of Sustainable Parameters for the Industrialization of Specialty Coffees

Version 1 : Received: 20 March 2024 / Approved: 21 March 2024 / Online: 26 March 2024 (03:07:06 CET)

How to cite: Malta, A.C.C.; Oliveira, A.P.L.R.D.; Oliveira, G.H.H.D. Recognition and Development of Sustainable Parameters for the Industrialization of Specialty Coffees. Preprints 2024, 2024031306. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202403.1306.v1 Malta, A.C.C.; Oliveira, A.P.L.R.D.; Oliveira, G.H.H.D. Recognition and Development of Sustainable Parameters for the Industrialization of Specialty Coffees. Preprints 2024, 2024031306. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202403.1306.v1

Abstract

The objective of this work was to evaluate the roast time, weight loss and quality of coffee grain at four different roasting degrees, aiming to recognize and develop sustainable patterns to industrialize specialty coffees. Coffee (Coffea arabica L.), from eight producers, with scores between 80 and 83 from SCA classification, were used. Samples of 300 g were roasted in a cylindric rotative roaster, until the grains reached four different roasting profiles (Agtron scale 22.36, #33.64, #40.05, #59.92). Afterwards, analysis of roasting time, gas pressure, weight loss, and sensorial grades were accomplished. It was observed that samples roasted at #22.36 led to significant differences, regarding roasting time and weight loss. Furthermore, there is a significant difference at the sensorial grades of the coffee beverage. Comparing the roast degree #40.05 (standard used for specialty coffee) with the roast degree #22.36 (most used for commodities coffee), the first one has a gas consumption of 0.34 kg per coffee kg, whilst the second presented a gas consumption of 0.41 kg per coffee kg. Thus, from gas consumption, roast degree # 40.05 is the more sustainable option, along with the remaining parameters analyzed.

Keywords

roasting; sustainability; coffee production; quality

Subject

Biology and Life Sciences, Food Science and Technology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.