Preprint
Review
The Fossil Record and Diversity of Pycnodondiform Fishes in Non-Marine Environments
This version is not peer-reviewed.
Submitted:
19 March 2024
Posted:
20 March 2024
You are already at the latest version
A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.
Abstract
Pycnodont fishes were a successful clade of neopterygian fishes that are predominantly found from shallow marine deposits. However, throughout their long 180 million years reign (Late Triassic - end Eocene), they have made multiple incursions into both brackish and freshwater environments. This fossil record mostly consists of fragmentary dental material but articulated specimens are known from Early Cretaceous lacustrine localities in Spain. This review article aims to document all non-marine occurrences of Pycnodontiformes throughout most of the Mesozoic and early Palaeogene. This review highlights two interesting trends in the history of non-marine habitat colonization by pycnodonts: (1) a huge spike in non-marine occurrences during the Cretaceous, (2) the most occurrences in non-marine localities occurred at the latest Cretaceous, the Maastrichtian. The high number of colonization events within the Cretaceous lines up with extreme climatic events such as high temperatures resulting in high sea levels which regularly flooded continental masses, allowing pycnodonts easier access to non-marine habitats. The increased presence of pycnodonts in brackish and freshwater habitats during the Maastrichtian might have played a role in their survival through the K/Pg extinction event. Freshwater habitats are not as vulnerable as marine ecosystems to environmental disturbance as the base of their food chain relies on detritus. Pycnodonts might have used such environments as a refuge and began to occupy marine waters after the K/Pg extinction event.
Keywords:
Pycnodonts
; freshwater
; brackish
; Jurassic
; Cretaceous
; extinction
; refuge.
1. Introduction
Despite making up less than 0.3% of available global water masses, freshwater environments contain a staggering diversity of fish species comprising approximately 25% of all known vertebrates [1] and 51% of all extant fishes. This high diversity in such a small area of habitat is due to high productivity, geographical isolation and various physiographic processes [2,3] such as light [4], thermal zonation [5] and oxygen concentration [6]. However, the fossil record of freshwater fishes is of substantially poorer quality than their marine counterparts and thus, far less is known about the evolutionary history of many freshwater fish lineages. This relative paucity of fossil material is due to various environmental conditions such as strong currents and greater risk of drying out during arid seasons. Additionally, the freshwater fish fossil record is biased towards fish in lentic habitats (e.g., stillwater such as lakes and ponds) contrary to those from lotic habitats (moving waters such as rivers and torrents). This is powerfully demonstrated by the fossil record of two freshwater teleost lineages from the Neotropical region, i.e., Characiformes and Siluriformes. The fossil record of characiforms consists of fragmentary material such as isolated teeth and scales testifying their occurrence in sediments representing faster moving water, whilst fossil siluriforms are more commonly represented by complete fossils and are typically found in stillwater environments [7]. However, a factor to also consider is that siluriforms have denser and thicker bones than characiforms, making them more amenable to fossilization. Many neotropical siluriforms are also armoured in some manner whether they possess pectoral and dorsal spines or dermal plates, increasing preservation chances further.
While many fish clades today are strictly freshwater see [8] there are many predominantly marine clades that have made incursions into and adapted to freshwaters such as members of Belonidae, Tetraodontidae, Acipenseridae, Mugilidae, and Gobiidae. Many other clades include diadromous taxa, i.e., moving in between marine and freshwater environments during their life history [9]. Pertinent examples are members of Salmoniformes and Clupeidae moving from marine environments into freshwaters to breed (anadromy) and freshwater eels of the family Anguillidae that migrate from marine environments as larvae and juveniles to rivers and lakes where they spend their adult life (catadromy).
Considering the history of any particular freshwater fish clade, it is rare that the clade in question originated in freshwater and it has been noted by Cavin [10] that most basal taxa for any freshwater clade occurred in marine waters. Among 15 present day families that had their origins in the Mesozoic, Patterson [11] only identified hiodontids, which are members of Osteoglossomorpha, as having originated and stayed in freshwater throughout their evolutionary history. During the course of their evolutionary history, many invasions of fishes into freshwater environments from lineages originating in marine waters have occurred. Some examples include Amiiformes [12], Ginglymodi [13], Acipenseriformes [14] and Coccolepididae [15].
One of the most successful lineages of fishes that lived during the Mesozoic were the pycnodontiforms or pycnodonts [16]. These fishes were considered as stem teleosts by Nursall [17], but a more recent phylogenetic analysis by Poyato-Ariza [18] showed pycnodonts to be rather positioned on the stem of Neopterygii.
Pycnodonts are most commonly associated with shallow marine environments such as reefs and appear to be specialized for such complex, structured habitats due to the deep bodied morphology with large medial fins (Figure 1) that are common to this order and are morphologically convergent with many extant coral reef fish families such as chaetodontids and balistids [19]. Cawley et al. [16] hypothesized that pycnodont fish diversity may be correlated with reef areas as their diversity was low when area occupied by reefs was minimal, but was high when reef area occupation increased. However, such a body plan also can be useful for other complex environments such as well vegetated freshwater biotopes and pycnodonts seemingly have repeatedly invaded brackish and freshwater environments multiple times throughout their history. Poyato-Ariza [20] consequently advised not to use pycnodonts as indicator taxa for any particular palaeoenvironment such as reefs due to occurrence of some in freshwater environments. Nevertheless, the true nature of these alleged fresh water pycnodonts has been since discussed. The review presented here aims to (1) compile all available pycnodont occurrences in brackish or freshwater deposits, (2) how this can inform about their palaeobiogeography through geological time and (3) discuss the occurrence of fully freshwater adapted pycnodonts.
2. Nonmarine occurrences
2.1 Middle Jurassic
2.1.1 Thailand
The earliest records of pycnodonts occurring in non-marine environments are difficult to accurately determine but can be traced back to the Middle Jurassic. The only definite record from this time interval to our knowledge is an isolated prearticular dentition from the Khlong Min Formation in Thailand that was presented by Cavin et al. [21] and identified as cf. Gyrodus. The Mab Ching locality has only been dated to be Middle to Late Jurassic in age based on charophytes [22,23] and fossil turtles [24] but unfortunately, more precise dating has not been inferred for this locality. A Middle Jurassic age for the pycnodont remain, nevertheless, seems likely since the Khlong Min Fm. is at the base of the stratigraphic sequence.
2.2 Late Jurassic
2.2.1 China
The Asian pycnodont record is very poor. So far, the only Late Jurassic Asian pycnodont that was reported from freshwater deposits is the little known Tibetodon gyroides from Changtu in the Tibetan highlands [25,26]. This taxon only is known by an isolated vomerine dentition exposing five rows of regularly arranged teeth and its age cannot be determined any further than being of Late Jurassic age. Young and Liu [25] assumed this taxon to be a member of the family Gyrodontidae due to the dental similarities with Gyrodus such as the depressed pit in the occlusal surface of the teeth. However, they also argue that due to its widely separated geographic position from most other pycnodonts around this time, it is also possible for this taxon to belong to a different family. The morphology of the teeth actually differs from that of typical members of Gyrodontidae supporting the latter interpretation.
2.2.2. North America
The only Late Jurassic records of freshwater pycnodonts from North America include a single broken tooth belonging to an undescribed pycnodontiform from the Morrison Formation (USA), which is of Oxfordian-Tithonian age [27]. It was assigned to Pycnodontoidea due to its highly ornamented crown surface and oval shape. The preserved portion of the tooth displays at least seven small cusplets surrounding a median occlusal depression. Such ornate teeth are found in pycnodontiforms such as Turbomesodon arcuatus from the Berriasian (Early Cretaceous) of South England and NW Germany [28,29], as well as Nonophalagodus trinitiensis and Texasensis coronatus from the Albian of North America [30,31] (see below for more information on these pycnodontiforms).
2.2.3. Africa
The only Late Jurassic African pycnodont non-marine record is the dubious Congopycnodus cornutus from the lacustrine Stanleyville Formation in the Democratic Republic of Congo. This taxon was based on the occipital region of the skull and a nuchal horn [32]. Previously, this formation was assumed to be Aalenian-Bathonian in age, which would have made this fish the oldest freshwater occurrence for pycnodonts. However, there is strong evidence that the Stanleyville Formation is actually Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous (Kimmerdigian to Barremian-Valanginian) in age see [33,34] for arguments. While the material of C. cornutus is fragmentary, the association of such bones together indicated that these remains represent the earliest known representative of the Coccodontoidea [35], a pycnodont clade containing highly derived armored pycnodonts such as Coccodontidae [36,37] Gladiopycnodontidae [35] and Gebrayelichthyidae [38], which are otherwise only found in the famous Cenomanian (Upper Cretaceous) marine limestone deposits of Lebanon. Whether this bizarre clade had its origins in freshwater environments or Congopycnodus was an outlier within the early horned pycnodonts remains ambiguous momentarily requiring more and better-preserved material including the characteristic dentition. We consider the material not indisputably enough to unambiguously attribute it to a pycnodontiform at all.
An isolated vomerine dentition referred to as cf. Pycnodus was reported from the Mugher Mudstone of the Abay (Blue River) Gorge, northwestern Ethiopian plateau, which is of ?Kimmeridgian–Tithonian age [39]. The depositional environment of the Mugher Mudstone is interpreted as representing meandering river deposits on a coastal plain [40,41]. The tentative assignment to Pycnodus has to be considered incorrect since members of Pycnodus are exclusively restricted to the Palaeogene [42]. This occurrence within a fluviatile environment on a coastal plain does not support this pycnodont to be a true freshwater fish, but also could represent a sporadic marine invader.
2.3. Early Cretaceous
In contrast to the Jurassic, the records of freshwater pycnodonts increased during the Early Cretaceous with a wide geographic distribution including some taxa, which have fully preserved articulated specimens. This pattern is in good accordance with the fossil record of other fishes, for which the Early Cretaceous seemingly was an important time interval for adapting to freshwater environments e.g., [10,43].
2.3.1. Thailand
Small incomplete vomerine dentitions and isolated teeth assigned to cf. Anomoeodus were found from the Phu Phan Thong locality in the Sao Khua Formation in Thailand [21]. The teeth are of Hauterivian-Barremian age. Cavin et al. [21] assigned this material to cf. Anomoeodus due to the similarities of the shape and ornamentation of the teeth shared with Anomoeodus which was widespread throughout the Cretaceous [44]. Of particular interest is that all specimens of cf. Anomoeodus found in this locality are tiny, suggesting that this pycnodont travelled into freshwater environments to breed and their young would have developed in freshwater habitats before returning to sea as an adult [45].
2.3.2. United Kingdom
Pycnodont records from non-marine deposits of the United Kingdom come exclusively from England. Hornung [29] presented a revision of Early Cretaceous pycnodonts not only from Germany (see below), but also from England, which includes various fragmentary prearticulars and vomers previously referred to as Coelodus. According to this author all specimens can either be assigned to Turbomesodon arcuatus (Figure 2) or T. laevidens, both occurring in the Middle Purbeck limestone, which is Berriasian and Berriasian-Valanginian age, respectively, to T. microdon from the Grinstead Clay Formation of Valanginian age, and T. multidens from the Sevenoaks locality of the Weald Clay Group of Hauterivian-Barremian age. Hornung [29] moreover infers that “Pycnodus” mantelli and T. arcuatus may be synonymous. If that is true, then the location of T. arcuatus in southern England and “Pycnodus” mantelli in Germany could be an indication that this taxon might be amphidromous due to the lack of a hydrographic connection between the continental Wessex and the Lower Saxony basins. However, both a better quality and higher quantity of specimens from both localities will be necessary to confirm such a hypothesis.
Sweetman et al. [46] reported premaxillary, dentary, vomer and prearticular bones with teeth from the Wessex Formation (Barremian) from southern England and assigned them to Coelodus sp. However, Cooper and Martill [47] observed that the morphology of the teeth resemble more that seen in Ocloedus [48]. An additional, still unidentified pycnodont referred only to as Pycnodontiformes indet. in the same locality is represented by fragmentary vomers and prearticulars along with isolated teeth.
The occurrence of the pycnodont Coelodus was reported from two layers in the Berriasian Middle Purbeck beds of Durlston Bay in southern England [26]. These remains were obtained from the Cherty freshwater layer of the Lulworth Formation and the inter-marine layer of the Durlston Formation, the palaeoenvironment of the former being a series of freshwater ponds and marshes and the latter being a freshwater-brackish lake based on salinity measures inferred from mollusc shells and evaporite data [49].
However, the taxonomic assignment to Coelodus or to a pycnodont at all remains dubious, because no description nor any figure of this material has been provided up to now, enabling any unambiguous identification of this pycnodont fish; it only was listed in a table. Thus, unless the specimens related to this taxonomic assignment can be found or further material recovered from this locality, these specimen/specimens should be considered dubious at the best.
Another Early Cretaceous freshwater pycnodont record based on isolated teeth comes from the Pevensey Pit of the Ashdown Brickworks quarry of Bexhill in southern England, which is Valanginian in age [50,51]. Even though these authors did not provide any taxonomic assignment, we tentatively assign them here to Ocloedus, because of the characteristic tooth morphologies. These teeth alongside material belonging to a diverse fauna of sharks, teleosts, amphibians and dinosaurs would have been deposited in a rapidly flowing river due to such material being reworked together with sediments along pebble shorefaces [52,53]. Additional evidence for this environment being freshwater can also be seen in the predominance of certain genera of ostracods and bivalves such as Cypridea and Neomiodon, respectively [54].
2.3.3 Germany
The non-marine Early Cretaceous fossil record of Germany is according to our current knowledge restricted mainly to the Berriasian of northern and north-western Germany. Due to the lack of complete or taxonomically informative fossil material, most of these specimens are referred to as Pycnodontiformes indet. Isolated teeth were recovered from various lacustrine facies of the Berriasian Bückberg Group such as Sehnde and Wätzum [Fuhse Fm.] [55,56], Egestorf in Lower Saxony [Isterberg Fm.] (late Berriasian) that originally were referred to Pycnodus mantelli by Struckmann [57], but lack any description or illustration, Barenberg near Borgholzausen in Northrhine-Westphalia [either Oesede or Isterberg formations], previously referred to as Gyrodus mantelli, which only were mentioned but not illustrated by Dunker [58], and finally Lobber Ort on the Island of Rügen [59]. These remains have to be considered ambiguous as long as no further information is available.
Prearticulars assigned to “Pycnodus” mantellii (aka T. arcuatus) also were reported from various Berriasian sites in Lower Saxony [58] and North-Rhine Westphalia, northern Germany [60]. Vomers and isolated teeth belonging to Turbomesodon cf. arcuatus also were discovered in North-Rhine Westphalia [29,60,61,62]. Another specimen of this taxon represented by a vomerine dentition was reported from an unknown locality in the Isterberg Formation of the Bückenberg Group [29]. Kriwet [63] also figured a specimen of this taxon as “Coelodus” sp. from northern Germany [63; fig 28c].
While the palaeoenvironment of all these Berriasian localities are interpreted as lacustrine, occasional marine influences cannot be completely rejected.
2.3.4. Belgium
While the locality of Bernissart in Belgium is most famous for the Iguanodon remains found at the bottom of a pit, a staggering number of actinopterygian specimens were unearthed from this locality, amounting to nearly 3000 specimens containing 17 species belonging to 12 genera [64,65]. The fossil remains were found in lacustrine clays, which are defined as the Sainte-Barbe Clays Formation [66,67]. The environment of Bernissart would have been lacustrine to swampy [68,69,70,71] and using palynological dating is estimated to be of late Barremian to early Aptian age [72,73,74]. The only pycnodont taxa found so far in this locality are some complete but imperfectly preserved specimens of Turbomesodon bernissartensis [75,76].
2.3.5. France
An assortment of isolated teeth of various morphotypes from the Berriasan locality of Champblanc Quarry in Cherves-de-Cognac, France can be referred to Pycnodonformes [77]. These teeth are commonly found in the upper levels of the Champblanc section, which are characterized by lacustrine limestones [78,79]. The most common morphotype found is similar to the morphology seen in Gyrodus with a papilla-like structure present in the middle of an occlusal pit and Pouech et al. [77] subsequently considered this morphotype as aff. Gyrodus.
The only other morphotype that could be identified with a particular genus are teeth with two rounded tubercles on each end of the tooth crown with a groove in between. Such a tooth morphology is similar to that seen in Arcodonichthys [80]. Every other morphotype from this locality cannot be assigned to any genus or species with the most granular assignment given being that of the family Pycnodontidae.
The large amount of different and diverse morphotypes in the Berriasan locality of Champblanc Quarry nevertheless indicate that a diverse pycnodont fauna occupied this habitat that probably underwent niche partitioning in order to exploit different resources efficiently [16,47,81]. Another interesting observation by Pouech et al. [77] was the distribution of pycnodonts within the sedimentary series of Cherves-de-Cognac compared to ginglymodians, another actinopterygian clade with many durophagous representatives. Pycnodonts are more commonly represented in the upper levels of the sedimentary series, which are dominated by lacustrine limestones leading the authors to propose a lacustrine life environment for pycnodonts. Lentic environments such as lakes might have been more ideal for the typical laterally flattened and dorso-ventrally high body of pycnodonts as their morphology already permits them to manoeuvre in shallow complex environments without the need for expending energy fighting the current. In contrast, isolated teeth of ginglymodians such as Scheenstia mantelli dominate the actinopterygian assemblage in the lower levels. The environment of this lower series is confirmed by geochemical analyses to be upstream waters close to the lagoon where these teeth were deposited [82]. This pattern of pycnodonts and ginglymodians occupying different habitats mirrors that seen in marine environments as shown by the separation of these two groups from the same locality in a body shape morphospace occupation [16].
2.3.6. Spain
The fossil record of non-marine pycnodont occurrences of Spain consists of not only abundant isolated dental remains but also many articulated skeletal remains (Figure 1) including holomorphic specimens.
A large abundance of isolated vomerine and prearticular tooth plates belonging to the pycnodont Arcodonichthys pasiegae were recovered from the Vega de Pas Formation (Hauterivian-Barremian) in the Cantabrian basin, northern Spain [80]. Sedimentation of this formation occurred in a lacustrine setting. Arcodonichthys pasiegae is easily identifiable due to the strongly curved anterior and posterior border of the vomerine teeth with swollen lateral ends. Due to the large number of specimens found of this taxon (over 100), some interesting aspects of its ecology can be inferred. The measurements of the tooth plates [see table in 80] suggest a small pycnodont close in size to taxa such as Stemmatodus [83] with an estimated size range of 4-7 cm. Tooth wear is extensive even in smaller specimens and the inner layer of dentine can be exposed in larger specimens [80; fig 1c]. This dental evidence along with the abundance of bivalves and gastropods found within the same fossil layers [84] as Arcodonichthys suggest that this species was particularly specialized to feed on hard shelled prey in comparison to many other pycnodonts, which were hypothesised to be more generalized durophages with a broad range of potential prey items as advocated by Poyato-Ariza [20] and Darras [85]. However, Kriwet [86] already hypothesized that pycnodonts were highly specialized feeders.
Several Lower Cretaceous localities in Eastern Spain yielded additional pycnodont fish material including complete skeletons. All these localities are situated in the Mesozoic Iberian Basin, an intracratonic basin situated at the eastern margin of the Iberian plate. The development of the Lower Cretaceous sub-basins of the Iberian Basin is related to the anticlockwise rotation of the Iberian Plate during the Mesozoic and extensional tectonic events [87].
Two of these famous localities are La Pedrera de Santa Maria de Meià (= La Pedrera de Rúbies) near Vilanova de Meià and La Cubrua in the Sierra de Montsec, Province of Lérida, north-eastern Spain [e.g., 88,89]. Originally assumed to be of Kimmeridgian age [90], Peybèrnes and Oertli [91] and Brenner [92] attributed a late Berriasian to early Valanginian age to the fossiliferous strata. The fish fauna includes chondrichthyans [only hybodonts; 93-95], an actinistian, and many actinopterygians [96,97,98,99,100]. Pycnodonts are abundant in the Sierra del Montsec and are represented by adult and juvenile specimens of a single species, Ocloedus subdiscus [48,89,101]. The depositional area of Montsec is subject to dispute. While some authors [102,103] interpret the depositional area as freshwater environment based on terrestrial faunal elements such as plants, insects, and tetrapods, the occurrence of agglutinating foraminifers, acritarchs, and brackish ostracodes indicate a marine environment [104]. This interpretation also is supported by the composition of the fish fauna [105]. The palaeogeographic situation of the fossiliferous strata also supports a coastal, intertidal environment, which is advocated here.
The syncline of Galve in the Province of Teruel in north-eastern Spain belongs structurally to the Lower Cretaceous sub-basin of Aliaga. The basin is built up of about 1000 m of Jurassic and Lower Cretaceous sediments and yielded ca. 60 vertebrate localities ranging from the Jurassic to Early Cretaceous in age [for reviews of the vertebrate fauna see 106,107]. The Early Cretaceous Aliaga sub-basin can be regarded as one of the most productive vertebrate localities of Early Cretaceous age on the Iberian Peninsula. Pycnodonts are represented by abundant isolated dentitions including both large and small specimens of the same taxon indicating the presence of juveniles and adults. Indeterminate pycnodontiforms were reported by Sánchez-Hernández et al. [107] from the upper part of the Berriasian-Barremian El Castellar Formation, which is interpreted as being an open lacustrine environment with distributary channels and a lagoonal system near the coast based on the presence of bioclastic limestones, sand beds, charophyte remains and root marks [108]. Soría and Meléndez [109] reported the presence of cf. Proscinetes sp. and Coelodus sp., as well as unidentifiable forms in the lower Barremian Camarillas Formation, which was interpreted by these authors as a fluvial environment. The presence of Anomoeodus or a similar taxon is indicated by the presence of an isolated premaxilla, which is characterized by three incisiform teeth (JK, pers. obser.). Lagoonal conditions in the syncline of Galve are supposed to have been established during the upper Barremian Artoles Formation, in which pycnodont dental remains are common (JK, pers. obser.). In contrast to this environmental interpretation, the selachians and associated actinopterygian fauna seems to favour an environment with at least sporadic connections to the open marine realm in the East [110].
Additional isolated dental remains of three different pycnodonts including two different pycnodontids of uncertain affinities (probably representing Ocloedus) and Anomoeodus nursalli were described by Kriwet [44] from coaly limestones (carbonates and clastics interbedded with coal seams of 60 to 65 cm thickness) of Uña in the Province of Cuenca, eastern Spain. The coals were described as brown coals or lignites [111,112,113]. They belong to the Huérgiuna Formation, which is early Barremian in age [114]. The depositional area generally is interpreted as freshwater. In addition to the pycnodonts, still un-described actinopterygians and a diverse tetrapod fauna were derived from one of these coals. Kriwet [44] hypothesized that the coals of Uña were accumulated at the margin of the Bay of Cuenca, which was connected to the marine realm in the east. Accordingly, continental faunal and floral contents were washed into this fast-changing area of paralic coal formation or lived at the edge of the bay. The pycnodonts thus probably were not primary inhabitants of this restricted, probably fast changing environment.
Although the vast majority of the Spanish Early Cretaceous non-marine pycnodont fossil record seemingly consists of fragmentary material such as isolated teeth and jaws, some complete pycnodont specimens from freshwater deposits nevertheless were recovered [89,115,116,117]. The most notable in addition to Oeclodus subdiscus from Montsech (see above) are Stenamara mia and Turbomesodon praeclarus from the lacustrine deposits of Las Hoyas in the Province of Cuenca, eastern Spain, which also is of Barremian age [76,118]. This locality was shown to represent a freshwater environment without any marine influence based on many factors including palaeoecology, palaeogeography, sedimentology, stratigraphy, taphonomy, and extensive isotope analysis of the fish fossils [119]. Both co-occurring pycnodonts are members of the Pycnodontidae, the most specious lineage of pycnodonts and are considered the first unambiguous record of non-marine pycnodonts that were discovered [119]. Stenamara is both the rarest and smallest of the two Los Hoyas pycnodonts with only two specimens known [117] and its standard length being 73 mm. While Stenamara is comparatively poorly preserved it can still be ascertained to include an adult specimen due to the presence of bifurcation in the lepidotrichia [120] and its extremely deep body (maximum body height/standard length being 124.5%) indicates it to have been a slow swimmer but well adapted to manoeuvre in complex environments such as the vegetated shallows of the lake of Las Hoyas. Turbomesodon praeclarus originally identified as Macromesodon aff. M. bernissartensis [121], conversely, was obviously much more common in Las Hoyas with 25 or more complete or partially preserved specimens along with isolated dentition [76]. Like Stenamara, it was a deep-bodied fish well adapted to manoeuvre in structured habitats. The discovery of small specimens of T. praeclarus from the Las Hoyas sediments indicate the presence of juveniles, which is considered additional evidence that these fishes were fully freshwater adapted as they evidently also reproduced in the lake [76,121].
Poyato-Ariza [117] speculated that the Las Hoyas pycnodonts might have been more herbivorous than what is typically assumed for the group as the usual pycnodont prey such as molluscs is not present in the Las Hoyas locality and crustaceans such as crayfish are too large for the small gaped pycnodonts to feed on and break apart. The charophyte alga Clavatoraxis robustus was in great abundance in Los Hoyas [117] and was reinforced with spine-cell rosettes, which Martín-Closas and Diéguez [122] interpreted as a defence mechanism against herbivory. Both Stenamara and Turbomesodon with their powerful molariform teeth and nipping incisiform teeth might have been able to tackle such well defended prey. This herbivory hypothesis is more plausible than initially assumed due to adaptations to plant eating being found in other pycnodonts including bicuspid teeth in the Late Triassic Gibbodon cenensis [123], Nursallia tethysensis [124] and Thiollierepycnodus wagneri [125]. A large premaxillary tooth with multiple cusps similar to that seen in modern herbivorous teleosts such as marine acanthurids and freshwater cichlids also can be seen in the Palaeocene Pycnodus multicuspidatus from Moroccan deposits [126]. A tooth microwear analysis by Baines [127] on the jaws of the Jurassic pycnodont Gyrodus planidens revealed that the orientation of dental wear patterns on the teeth show that it was capable of propalinal or horizontal jaw movements, which is similar to that seen in mammals. These jaw movements would have been effective for processing plant material in contrast to the vertical crushing actions more typically used to access hard shelled prey items. The comparatively high number of T. plaeclarus specimens in particular could be used to test such dietary hypotheses in the future.
Some interesting trace fossils at Las Hoyas possibly can be attributed to pycnodonts. These horizontal trails consisting of a sinusoidal wave are referred to as the ichnospecies Undichna unisulca [128] and are preserved as epichnial grooves or hypichnial ridges. These trace fossils are more commonly preserved in freshwater environments and are a decent indicator of palaeoenvironmental setting [128]. The producer of these trace fossils would need to possess a large caudal fin with no overlap with the anal fin to produce such traces in the sediment. There are currently no fishes known from Las Hoyas that have such a caudal fin morphology without another fin leaving occasional traces. Pycnodonts typically have large anal fins that would fit in with the form of the trace fossils left behind and so were posited by Gibert et al. [128] to have been the most likely producers of U. unisulca. Turbomesodon praeclarus, being the more common of the two pycnodont taxa found at Las Hoyas is the most likely producer of these traces. Nevertheless, the palaeogeographic situation of Las Hoyas close to the marine realm during the Barremian does not preclude occasional marine ingressions.
In addition to these well-known vertebrate sites, many other Early Cretaceous localities on the Iberian Peninsula, which are supposed to represent freshwater settings yielded isolated dental remains of pycnodonts, such as from the Berriasian of Lérida, eastern Spain (Proscinetes sp. cf. P. bernardi), the Barremian of Aguilón near Zaragoza, eastern Spain (Coelodus sp.), the Aptian of Cintorres near Valencia and Mirambel in Teruel, eastern Spain (Anomoeodus complanatus), the Aptian of Morella, Valencia, eastern Spain (Coelodus sp. aff. C. soleri), the Albian of Ceceda, Asturias (undetermined pycnodont), the Albian of Condemios de Abajo, Castilla-La-Mancha, central Spain (Anomoeodus sp. aff. A. muensteri), and the Albian-Cenomanian of the area of Girona in Catalonia (Coelodus soleri) [93,129,130,131,132]. No pycnodont fish remains from non-marine deposits of Early Cretaceous age have been reported from western or southern Spain, or even Portugal to date. Nevertheless, this review emphasizes the incomplete knowledge of these fishes from the Early Cretaceous of the Iberian Peninsula, both in terms of taxonomy and environmental distribution.
2.3.8. North America
The currently known non-marine Early Cretaceous record of pycnodonts from North America seemingly is restricted to the Aptian-Albian. Oreska et al. [133] reported five partial vomers which they assigned to aff. Pycnodontidae indet. This material was collected from two vertebrate microfossil beds, at the Little Sheep Mudstone Member of the Cloverly Formation of Wyoming which has been dated to Aptian [134]. These microfossils were accumulated in concentrations within clay and mudstones and the lack of wear on these fossils indicate low transport and a low energy depositional environment [135] which, along with fine grained sediments and weathering volcanic ash, can be interpreted as a lacustrine environment [136].
Pycnodont remains also were reported from the Holly Creek Fm., which is part of the Trinity Group in Arkansas and which is dated to the Albian [137]. The depositional environment is suggested to be a coastal plain, being a mixed water to brackish environment based on stable isotope work performed on turtle shells [138]. This formation contains two pycnodonts: Pycnodontiformes indet. and Anomoeodus caddoi [137]. Anomoeodus caddoi is represented by one isolated tooth and two prearticular toothplates. A singular branchial and oral tooth are the only material representing Pycnodontiformes indet.
The greatest number of North American non-marine pycnodont occurrences during the Early Cretaceous can be observed in northern Texas [30,139,140,141,142] and consists exclusively of isolated dental remains. Based on these remains, several taxa were identified such as Texasensis coronatus from the Paluxy Fm. of the Huggins and Pecan Valley Estates sites of northern Texas (Albian), which consists of a series of sandstones and shales representing fluvial meanderbelt to coastal barrier and deltaic facies [143]. This species originally was referred to as Callodus coronatus by, e.g., Thurmond [30] and Winkler et al. [140,141] but transferred to Texasensis by Özdikmen [31], because the name of Callodus is preoccupied by a beetle.
Another pycnodont that also occurs in the Pecan Valley site is “Macromesodon” dumblei (most likely a member of Turbomesodon), while Nonaphalgodus trinitiensis was described from the Albian deposits of Butler Farm [144], which also is considered to represent a freshwater pycnodont. The pycnodont Thurmondella estesi, which originally was ascribed to the genus Paramicrodon that, however, represents a synonym of a genus of flies [145], is known from two Texas localities spanning two different geological stages, i.e., Albian and Aptian, both belonging to the Paluxy Fm. [141]. The fossils of this species were recovered from deposits, which are in close association with thin, variably developed bituminous coal and plant fragment-bearing mudstones indicating continental influence [141]. Other taxa recovered from Albian non-marine localities of northern Texas include “Palaeobalistum” geiseri, “Proscinetes” texanus and “Coelodus” sp. [141].
2.3.9. South America
South American Early Cretaceous non-marine pycnodont records come from a fossil fish assemblage of the Açu Formation, which is located in the Potiguar Basin in Ceará, north-eastern Brazil. The deposits of this formation were interpreted as a meandering riverine environment with some tidal influence [146]. Precise dating of this formation has been unsuccessful so far due to the lack of stratigraphically useful and diagnostic fossils, but an Albian-Cenomanian age was suggested based on palynological analyses [147,148]. More recent stratigraphic data provided by by Arai [149,150] specified the age of the Açu Formation as Albian in age.
Isolated teeth and a partially preserved vomerine and prearticular dentition of pycnodonts were recovered from the Açu Formation [151] and assigned to “Pycnodontiformes incertae sedis” due to the lack of more complete and taxonomically diagnosable material. These specimens are likely to represent a new genus as it differs from all other known Brazilian pycnodont taxa in the shape and ornamentation of the teeth, which are present as a series of crenulations on the margin of the tooth (Figure 2) [151].
2.3.10. Africa
A fragmentary prearticular and isolated teeth from the Albian Jebel Boulouha North locality in Tunisia tentatively were assigned to aff. Gyrodus sp. by Cuny et al. [152]. Sedimentation of the fossiliferous layers were interpreted as a terrestrial carbonate rich environment [153]. The teeth display an apical depression, which is surrounded by crenulated margins similar to what is seen in European specimens also assigned to aff. Gyrodus sp. from the Hauterivian by Kriwet and Schmitz [154]. This similarity prompted Cuny et al. [152] to assign this material to a similar taxon, pending better preserved material.
Another Tunisian specimen from the Albian described by Cuny et al. [152] is an isolated tooth identified as Pycnodontiformes indet., which was recovered from the Oued el Khil assemblage. The depositional area of this assemblage was interpreted as a brackish environment due to the mix of freshwater and marine influences found in deposition [153,155].
The Kem Kem Group of Morocco is one of the most famous Cretaceous freshwater localities, being Albian-Cenomanian in age. While better known for hosting a multitude of giant vertebrate taxa such as the theropod dinosaurs Spinosaurus [156,157,158] and Carcharodontosaurus [159], the sawfish Onchopristus [160,161] and the coelacanth Mawsonia [162], the Kem Kem also provided a diverse pycnodont fauna [47]. All of the known pycnodont taxa from this locality are represented by fragmentary dentitions and isolated teeth, which are poorly preserved probably as result of the high energy riverine environment that characterizes the sedimentary setting of the Kem Kem. The corresponding pycnodont fauna is of note for two things in particular: 1) it is the oldest record of pycnodonts from Morocco and 2) it is the most diverse record of freshwater pycnodont assemblages known in the fossil record with at least four genera being represented. This assemblage also allowed the identification of a second species of Neoproscinetes, N. africanus. This species shares with N. penalvai from the Early Cretaceous of Brazil similar circular to subcircular medial vomerine teeth and similar morphologies, numbers and arrangement of teeth on the prearticular (Figure 2). Agassizilia erfoudina, an endemic taxon for the Kem Kem group, is similar to Iemanja from the Early Cretaceous of Brazil in that the prearticular teeth are small and irregularly arranged, but they are only restricted to the lateral margin in Agassizilia (Figure 2). This suggests it may have also fed on soft shelled crustaceans as was suggested for Iemanja [47]. The other two pycnodont taxa are not well enough preserved to allow a definitive taxonomic assignment but were identified as cf. Macromesodon and cf. Coelodus due to sharing many similarities with the aforementioned genera of pycnodont fishes. Cooper and Martill [47] hypothesized that the high diversity of pycnodonts in the Kem Kem group could be due to niche partitioning as each taxon found has a unique arrangement of teeth, which, combined with the few stomach contents of pycnodonts that are preserved being monospecific [86], suggests high specialization of each genus to different prey items. Additional evidence for such niche partitioning was found through the results of a morphospace analysis concerning pycnodont lower jaws [16].
2.4. Late Cretaceous
2.4.1. China
Zhou et al. [163] documented a hitherto unknown pycnodont, Xinjiangodus gyrodoides, which is represented by a fragmentary vomerine and prearticular dentition coming from the sandy mudstones of the Donggou Formation at the southern margin of the Junggar Basin in Xinjiang, China. The exact age of this formation is problematic with some authors indicating a Coniacian-Santonian age [164] and others restricting it to the Maastrichtian [165]. More recent work based on fossil ostracods attributes a Coniacian-Campanian age to the Donggou Formation [166,167]. The sedimentary environment of the fossiliferous site of this pycnodont is indicative of shallow lake deposits. A characteristic feature of X. gyroides distinguishing it from other pycnodonts is the large spacing between teeth, and the presence of an apical depression on the tooth crowns with radiating wrinkles [163: table 1). An isolated opercular bone also was assigned to this taxon. However, the shape and size of the fragmentary opercular bone is far too wide and large for pycnodonts and it is more probable that it belongs to a teleost. Alternatively, it could be the remains of a preopercular bone of a pycnodont as that bone is typically more expanded in pycnodonts, but this specimen is too fragmented to genuinely identify this bony element to any pycnodontiform let alone X. gyrodoides.
2.4.2. India
Complete pycnodont skeletons representing a single species, “Pycnodus” lametae have long been known from the Late Cretaceous Lameta Formation of central India (Province of Maharashtra) [168,169]. The Lameta Fm. is part of the infratrappean beds, which were deposited below the Deccan Traps. These traps represent the deposits of active volcanic flows during the latest Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) found in association with sedimentary beds of continental origin. The infratrappean beds of the Lameta Fm. were interpreted as palustrine/lacustrine depositional environments in an alluvial-plain setting under semiarid climatic conditions based on palaeontological and sedimentological evidence [170,171,172,173].
An additional incomplete specimen of “Pycnodus” lametae consisting of a crushed skull and missing caudal region was described from laminated clays of the same area from which the specimen of Woodward [168] originated, at Dongargaon by Mohabey and Udhoji [174]. These authors mistakenly assigned this specimen as the holotype despite the holotype being the specimen described by Woodward [168]. The assignment of this pycnodont to Pycnodus is problematic due to the lack of a post-parietal process [reported in 42], so revision of this material is necessary for taxonomic purposes.
Isolated teeth of various tetraodontiforms, which were initially assigned to Stephanodus libycus, Indotrigonodon ovatus, Pisdurodon spatulatus and Eotrigonodon wardhaensis also were reported from the Lameta Fm. [175,176]. Prasad [169] provided a detailed review of the vertebrate fauna of the Deccan Traps and reassigned these teeth to an indeterminate pycnodontid. The teeth of S. libycus were interpreted as branchial teeth, whereas the teeth of I. ovatus, P. spatulatus and E. wardhaensis were interpreted as oral teeth [169]. Shome and Chandel [177] reported the presence of branchial teeth, which were assigned to Pycnodus sp. from the Papro Fm. of Lalitpur District, Uttar Pradesh, which is dated to the Maastrichtian based on the vertebrate microfauna fossil record. Oral teeth of "Pycnodus” sp. and branchial teeth named Stephanodus libycus were also discovered from predominantly freshwater, lacustrine and palustrine (swamp) deposits of the Maastrichtian Lameta Fm. in the Province of Madhya Pradesh [178,179].
Many additional records of pycnodonts are known from intertrappean beds. In contrast to infratrappean beds, intertrappean beds were deposited during the dormancy stages of volcanic activity and are thus intercalated within the lava flows. These depositions are generally considered to have been freshwater lacustrine palaeoenvironments that would have occupied low-lying areas on the surface of lava flows when volcanic flow had ceased.
Khosla et al. [180] reports the presence of a branchial tooth assigned to an indeterminate pycnodontid from an intertrappean section of Kisalpuri, which also contains freshwater ostracods. Teeth named Pycnodus bicresta were reported from the Naskal locality of the Andhra Pradesh Fm., which was interpreted as an alkaline lake in a floodplain setting based on sedimentlogical, palaeontological and taphonomic evidence [181,182]. Since these authors considered pycnodonts to be an exclussively marine group, they assumed that P. bicresta had migrated into this lake through river channels and became subsequently entrapped.
Also, from Naskal, a specimen of “Pycnodus” lametae was reported to have been recovered, which, unfortunately, was lost during preparation [183]. It seems that “Pycnodus” lametae is a common freshwater taxon in India as Rana [184] has reported specimens from several localities including Asifabad, Nagpur and Rangapur. As well as “Pycnodus” lametae [185], two other pycnodont taxa, Pycnodus bicresta [169,186] which was originally assigned as an indeterminate pycnodontid [176,185] and Pycnodus cf. P. praecursor [184] are known from the Asifabad Fm., the latter restricted to infratrappean beds while the other pycnodont specimens also are found in intertrappean beds.
Another unidentified pycnodontid, represented by a prearticular bone, branchial, incisiform and molariform oral teeth, is known from the Maastrichtian Piplanarayanwar of the Chhindwara District, Madhya Pradesh [186]. This locality was interpreted to have a nearshore, coastal plain environment due to the abundance of the myliobatid batomorph Igdabatis indicus. Diverse mixes of nonmarine and marine taxa at the Asifibad and Nagpur sites also indicate some marine influences [185,187,188].
Two other Indian localities of Late Cretaceous to Palaeogene age provided additional isolated pycnodont teeth, which all were identified as Pycnodus sp. These include the estuarine deposits of the Maastrichtian-Selandian Fatehgarh Fm. of Rajasthan [189,190] and the Maastrichtian-Danian intertrappean beds at the Jhilmili locality, Chhindwara District [191], in which the presence of Pycnodus together with Lepisosteus remains indicate a fluvio-lacustrine environment. It nevertheless should be noted that all Late Cretaceous pycnodont remains assigned to Pycnodus have to be considered as different taxon since Pycnodus is not known before the Cenozoic [compare 42].
2.4.3. Austria
Isolated teeth and a fragmentary right prearticular were reported from the Turonian Schönleiten Formation in SE Austria (Steiermark) and assigned to Coelodus plethodon by Schultz and Paunović [192]. This species originally was described by Arambourg and Joleaud [193] from the marine Campanian of Niger (Africa). Ősi et al. [194] argued that the Austrian material is too fragmentary to assign it unambiguously to any particular genus, with which we agree here. Consequently, these remains have to be considered as Pycnodontidae or even Pycnodontiformes indet. The specimen was recovered from grey shales which represents a brackish, estuarine environment [195,196,197].
2.4.4 Hungary
The pycnodontid cf. Coelodus was reported from the Santonian Csehbánya Fm. of Iharkút, Hungary based on isolated dental remains [198,199,200] (Figure 2). The prearticulars were initially considered to represent probably two different morphotypes by Ősi et al. [201], but Szabó et al. [200] nevertheless assigned all the Iharkút material to a single taxon until more complete material is available for a definite identification.
Sedimentation of the Csehbánya Fm. was determined to have been a floodplain environment [202]. Work on the pycnodont dentitions from multiple authors has revealed quite a lot about the palaeoecology of these pycnodonts. Stable isotope composition performed on their teeth revealed low concentrations of strontium and that migration from marine or brackish environments thus were unlikely [198]. Additionally, different ontogenetic stages are represented evidencing that these pycnodonts inhabited these non-marine environments for their entire life [200]. Botfalvai et al. [199] revealed that these pycnodonts were comparatively abundant in the vertebrate assemblage being the third most frequent group represented by 28 individuals. An abundance of potential molluscan prey such as bivalves and gastropods are known from the Csehbánya Formation and Szabó et al. [200] hypothesized that these would have formed the main food source of the pycnodonts. However, so far, no direct evidence of a predator-prey relationship between these pycnodonts and molluscs has been observed.
Another Hungarian pycnodont represented by isolated molariform oral and hook-like branchial teeth, which currently is assigned to Pycnodontiformes indet. was recovered from the Santonian Ajka Coal Fm. [203]. This pycnodont also can be determined to be a freshwater inhabitant as the Ajka Formation was dominated by swampy and lacustrine environments in multiple sub basins [204,205,206].
2.4.5. France
Fragmentary vomerine and prearticular dentitions identified as cf. Phacodus were recovered from the Campanian Villeveyrac - L’Olivet locality in southern France [45]. The fossil assemblage of this site, particularly the remains of plants and molluscs such as gastropods and bivalves correspond to taxa that are typically known from lacustrine environments [207]. As with cf. Anomoeodus from the Barremian Sao Khua Fm. of Thailand, Cavin et al. [45] also observed that all specimens of cf. Phacodus from this locality were small (e.g., the vomer was estimated to be roughly 5 mm long if complete). Using the proportions of a typical pycnodont [63] then it corresponds to a total length of just over 5 cm. All other known records of Phacodus show it to be a marine fish with specimens 20 times larger than the vomer from Villeveyrac – L’Olivet. Assuming that the French specimens represent juveniles, Phacodus might have represented an anadromous fish, with adults returning to freshwater to spawn and juveniles travelling to marine waters once they reached adulthood.
2.4.6. Spain
Isolated teeth belonging to unidentified pycnodonts were reported by many authors from the Campanian-Maastrichtian locality of Lo Hueco of the Province of Cuenca in eastern Spain [208,209,210,211], which was a swamp or wetland type environment based on palynological analysis [210]. During the Maastrichtian, a number of freshwater and estuarine environments from north-eastern Iberia [212] were home to several taxa of pycnodonts but unfortunately, all of these are represented by isolated teeth only and thus, are rarely assigned to genus level. These environments include the brackish coastal plain Fontllonga-6 locality (Pycnodontiformes indet., ?Pycnodontiformes indet.), the coastal lagoonal site of Els Nerets (cf. Coelodus sp.), which is interpreted to be predominantly freshwater due to the richness of cypriniforms and freshwater zygospores in the lower beds from the site but also contain some marine influence due to the presence of dinoflagellate cysts in the upper beds, the estuarine wetland L’Espinau site (?Pycnodontiformes indet., cf. Coelodus sp.), the floodplains of Serrat del Rostiar-1 (Pycnodontiformes indet.), which contain ephemeral ponds and fluvial channels with some marine influence, the riverine environment of the Camí del Soldat locality of the Tremp Fm. (Pycnodontiformes indet.), which had a stable salinity due to tidal currents accumulating seawater in shallow pools at the margins of the river [213].
2.4.7. North America
Jaws and teeth belonging to two indeterminate species of pycnodontids were uncovered from the Mussentuchit Member of the Cenomanian Cedar Mountain Fm. in Emery County, Utah [214,215], which represents a broad alluvial floodplain with no evidence of marine or brackish water facies [216]. The Cenomanian Dakota Fm. of the Grand Staircase–Escalante National Monument region of Utah, which was a floodplain environment yielded vomerine and prearticular tooth plates, branchial teeth and contour scales that were assigned to Coelodus sp. by Brinkman et al. [217]. Fragmentary vomers, isolated vomerine teeth, branchial teeth and contour scales belonging to Coelodus sp. are also uncovered from the Turonian Smoky Hollow Member of the Straight Cliffs Formation in Utah, which contains sediments indicating a lacustrine/floodplain palaeoenvironment from the middle Turonian [217]. Additionally, isolated vomerine and branchial teeth of Coelodus sp. were found in the Coniacian John Henry Member of the Straight Cliffs Formation. These Coniancian specimens also are considered to be non-marine as they co-occur with teeth of the freshwater shark Lonchidion [218,219]. Brinkman et al. [217] also reported isolated oral and branchial teeth of Micropycnodon sp. from two brackish localities, the Santonian Straight Cliffs and Campanian Wahweap formations, both localities also from southern Utah.
2.4.8. South America
Just as in the Early Cretaceous, South America provided a wide assortment of non-marine Late Cretaceous pycnodonts. The most diverse continental vertebrate fauna of Late Cretaceous age of South America comes from the Cenomanian Alcântara Formation of Brazil [220,221]. Here, the Laje do Coringa outcrop is the richest fossil site of the Alcântara Fm. and shows high taxonomic similarities with the vertebrate fauna of the Kem Kem beds, which is related to South America and Africa drifting apart in the late Aptian-Albian [222]. Pycnodonts of the Laje do Coringa assemblage are represented by isolated remains of a single indeterminate pycnodontiform [223]. The palaeoenvironment of Laje do Coringa was inferred by Medeiros et al. [222] as an estuary located in a forested coastline in a semi-arid to arid climate.
In Argentina, isolated vomerine and prearticular dentitions of at least two pycnodontiforms were recovered from non-marine sediments of the Maastrichtian Yacoraite Fm. Several dental remains identified as Coelodus toncoensis were reported from gray and black shale levels of the Amblayo Member in the Salta Basin [224,225,226,227,228]. Sedimentation of the Amblayo Member was predominantly marine but becomes increasingly mixed with freshwater and decreases in sea levels near the boundary with the overlying Güemes Member as can be seen in the low values of oxygen and carbon isotopes obtained from the deposited limestone [229]. This environmental change can also be observed in the increase in terrigenous content and the accumulation of silty red sandstone and mudstone-wackestone facies [229]. Both types of evidence indicate that C. toncoensis occupied a shallow water environment with varying salinity. The gray and black shales from which the remains of C. toncoensis were recovered are indicators of a profundal setting within the center of a lacustrine basin [230].
Additionally, an indeterminate pycnodontiform was reported from the Tres Cruces sub-basin of the Yacoraite Fm. [231]. Marquillas et al. [229] conducted an isotope analysis of the limestones of this sub-basin and found a similar decrease in oxygen and carbon isotope values as was found for the upper Amablayo Member suggesting a similar brackish environment for this pycnodont as for C. toncoensis.
The only other South American country where freshwater pycnodonts were recorded is Bolivia. Here, a tooth of an indetermined pycnodont was described from the Campanian Chaunaca Fm. representing a continental fluvial deposit [232,233].Three pycnodont taxa were recovered from the brackish/lagoonal Paja Patcha locality of the Lower El Morino Formation, which is Maastrichtian in age: branchial teeth assigned to an indeterminate pycnodontid [234,235], a fragmentary prearticular of Coelodus sp. [235] and fragmentary prearticulars, vomers and isolated teeth belonging to Coelodus toncoensis [234,235,236]. An indeterminate pycnodontid also was reported by de Muizon et al. [237] from the marshy to palustral Vila Vascarra locality, which also belongs to the El Morino Fm.
2.4.9. Africa
Taxonomically undiagnostic pycnodont teeth (Pycnodontiformes indet.) from the Cenomanian “Continental Intercalaire” of the Guir Basin of Algeria were reported by Benyoucef et al. [238]. One tooth is more rounded than the other and unornamented while the other tooth is ornamented by a series of crenulations surrounding an apical depression. They were recovered from the Menaguir site, which is interpreted to be a near shore environment based on sedimentological and ichnological features implying brackish water conditions [238].
Two taxa of Maastrichtian non-marine pycnodonts, Pycnodus sp. and Pycnodus jonesae, were reported from the Ménaka Formation in the Iullemmeden Basin, Mali [239,240]. Both Pycnodus taxa were deposited in a phosphate conglomerate, which is indicative of shallow marine to brackish environmental conditions rather than being freshwater [241]. Pycnodus sp. is represented by fragmentary tooth plates, which are insufficiently preserved to assign to a species level. Specimens of Pycnodus jonesae are represented by isolated teeth, prearticular dentitions and indeterminate tooth plates. However, the assignment of these remains to Pycnodus are dubious and they certainly represent other, probably new pycnodontiforms [compare 42].
2.4.10. Madgascar
Only one possible freshwater pycnodont represented by an incomplete vomerine tooth plate assigned to Coelodus sp. has been reported from Madagascar up to now, which is Maastrichtian in age [242]. This specimen comes from the Anembalemba Member of the Maevarano Formation in Boeny, which is interpreted as a coastal alluvial plain that was subject to strong seasonality with intense rainfall followed by periods of drought based on sedimentary features in the facies deposits showcasing alternating episodes of turbulent flow and mass flow [243,244,245]. The Maevarano Formation being coastal and being overlain by the Maastrichtian marine Berivotra Formation could explain why Coelodus and other marine fish taxa were present in this continental setting as marine transgression could allow for easier access to such environments [243].
2.5. Palaeogene
Pycnodont diversity in the Palaeogene drops significantly compared to what is seen in the prior Late Cretaceous [16,19] and as a result, less non-marine occurrences of pycnodonts were identified in the fossil record.
2.5.1. India
Palaeogene non-marine pycnodontiforms of India were reported from the intertrappean Andhra Pradesh Formation at Rajahmundry including two taxa, Pycnodus sp. and Pycnodus cf. P. praecursor [184]. These fossiliferous layers were deposited just after the K/Pg extinction event during the early Danian according to 40Ar/39Ar radioisotopic dating and palaeomagnetism [246]. Branchial teeth originally identified as Eotrigonodon aff. E. jonesi and also found in Rajahmundry are now considered to belong to a pycnodontid [169,247]. Additional teeth of unidentified pycnodontids were additionally uncovered from this site [248]. All of these fishes were deposited in silty claystones, which which reflect supratidal to terrestrial environments followed by a return to restricted brackish conditions [249].
2.5.2. North America
Isolated molariform teeth of Pycnodus sp. have been collected from both the Tallahatta (Ypresian-Lutetian) and Lisbon formations (Lutetian) of the Claiborne Group in Alabama, USA [250]. The palaeoenvironment of the Claiborne Group was most likely a marine environment with a soft/muddy bottom based on an analysis of otoliths of various teleosts [250]. However, the presence of teleost families in this locality known to occupy brackish waters [250], as well as fossils of turtle taxa that occur in estuaries today being found in the same locality [251] indicate that this pycnodont might have been an inhabitant of an estuarine environment.
2.5.3. South America
Benedetto and Sanchez [225] report Coelodus toncoensis not only from the Maastrichtian Amblayo Member of the Yacoraite Formation but also from the limestones of the Yacoraite Formation close to the boundary of the Santa Barbara Formation. This description correlates well with the Alemanía Member of the Yacoraite Formation, which is of Danian age [229,230] indicating that this species might have survived the K-Pg extinction event. In the Palaeogene part of the Yacoraite Fm., a return to more marine conditions can be observed based on a change from negative to positive values in carbon and oxygen isotopes [229]. However, palaeontological evidence such as the presence of euryhaline invertebrates including ostracodes, bivalves and gastropods indicate a shallow marine environment with some localised mixing of fresh and brackish waters [252], which matches the mixed environment of the upper Amblayo Member (Maastrichtian) of the Yacoraite Fm. where C. toncoensis was also present.
2.5.4. Africa
Like with the Pycnodus specimens from the Maastrichtian, the Palaeogene pycnodonts from Mali also were found in phosphatic conglomerates indicating shallow marine to brackish conditions. An earlier Malian representative of Pycnodus from the Palaeocene (Selandian-Thanetian), P. jonesae, might have survived the K-Pg extinction event and was recovered from the Teberemt Formation of the Gao Trench and Iullemmeden basins. Additionally, P. jonesae was found in the late Palaeocene (Thanetian) Teberemt Fm. of the Iullemeden Basin [239,240]. Pycnodus sp. was also reported from the Teberemt Fm. The most famous of these localities is located in the Tamaguélelt Fm. of the Taoudenit Basin, Mali, which yielded three taxa of Pycnodus, Pycnodus sp., P. zeaformis and P. maliensis, which are all Eocene (Ypresian) in age [239,240]. It is noteworthy that P. maliensis is represented by prearticular remains, while P. zeaformis is known by vomers indicating that both could be synonymous.
3. Discussion
One clear pattern arises when the entire non-marine pycnodont fossil record is considered: The incredible rise in such occurrences throughout the Cretaceous. While Jurassic occurrences are sporadic with low generic diversity, that changes dramatically when one enters the Early Cretaceous with 14 known genera observed during this time period and the number of occurrences is eleven times higher than the preceding period (Table 1 and Table 2). A map of these occurrences shows that pycnodonts were initially present in far eastern Asia, North America and central Africa during the Late Jurassic and have extended their range into Western Europe, South America and northern Africa in the Early Cretaceous (Figure 3). Number of occurrences and known genera both decrease in the Late Cretaceous with the latter being especially affected by a poorer fossil record with six known genera. Late Cretaceous non-marine occurrences also see the first appearance of pycnodonts in both Madagascar and India. There is a westward shift throughout the late Cretaceous in the distribution of non-marine South American pycnodonts from Brazil in the Cenomanian to Bolivia and Argentina in the Campanian-Maastrichtian.
It is only in the Cretaceous that fully articulated fossil non-marine specimens are found such as Stenamara mia and Turbomesodon praeclarus [48,76] from the Barremian Las Hoyas Fm. in Spain and Pycnodus lametae [168,169,174] from the Maastrichtian Lameta Fm. In India, which has greatly helped researchers in the accurate classification of specimens whereas the Jurassic and Palaeogene non-marine pycnodonts are represented by far more fragmentary material. Also of note is that all articulated pycnodont specimens are found in lacustrine deposits but are a significant minority of non-marine pycnodont specimens discovered so far 5 out of 129 listed occurrences or 3.88% (see Appednix A). Although the preservation quality of the freshwater pycnodont fossil record is generally poor, with the few exceptions mentioned above, Guinot and Cavin [253] detected a major decrease in body size among pycnodonts when they moved into freshwater habitats. When all occurrences are presented for just the Cretaceous, both the earliest (Berriasian) and final (Maastrichtian) stage of the Cretaceous, have the largest number of non-marine pycnodont occurrences by 17.3% and 26.4%, respectively (Figure 4, Table 3).
Why pycnodonts were so common in non-marine habitats during the Cretaceous could be a result of the environmental conditions throughout much of this time. The Early Cretaceous in particular was a time of immense environmental change with not only sea level changes but a shift from an arid to a humid climate [254]. Sea levels were much higher than today due to the absence of polar ice caps. Such variations in sea level increase the possibility of marine fishes colonizing continental environments and was a major factor for why many marine fish lineages made incursions into freshwater environments during the Miocene [255]. Low sea levels, conversely, increased the spread of low-lying areas, which would have allowed for the movement of freshwater fishes from one hydrographic basin to another and which thus could have been an additional factor for why freshwater occurrences in pycnodonts had risen so dramatically from the Late Jurassic to the Early Cretaceous (Table 1-2, Appendix A).
Epicontinental seas were a common phenomenon during the Cretaceous such as the Western Interior Seaway Albian-Maastrichtian; [256,257] and the Trans-Saharan Seaway Cenomanian-Ypresian; [240]. Due to the increase in sea levels, many brackish water ecosystems as well as interior seas developed and would have encountered extreme variations in salinity. This probably explains why many fossil localities from the Cretaceous contain mixed assemblages of both freshwater and marine fish taxa making habitat interpretations based on fish taxa alone difficult and prone to errors. There also was a period of high sea levels during the Palaeogene such as the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum event (56 MYA), which coincides with the exclusive presence of pycnodonts in brackish water environments (Appendix A), e.g., those occurring in Mali [240]. The increase in freshwater habitat occupation during the Cretaceous may reflect a genuine signal as similar movements into these habitats can be observed in other fish groups at the time such as Ginglymodi [13] and Hybodontiformes [11].
Freshwater habitats being used as a refugia for ancient fish clades is a consistent evolutionary pattern and was noted in Amiiformes, Lepisosteiformes and Dipnoi [11,258,259,260]. Cavin [10] stated that freshwater environments appeared to be far less vulnerable to environmental disturbance than marine habitats during the K-Pg extinction event. The majority of fish clades (14 of 15 families) that became extinct at this time were marine forms that were also piscivores at the top of the food chain [261] and no exclusively freshwater clade was wiped out during the K-Pg boundary event. An analysis by Sheehan and Fastovsky [262] revealed that over 80% of actinopterygian species from freshwater deposits in eastern Montana crossed the K-Pg boundary. Similarly, work by Cavin and Martin [263] showed that most actinopterygian families (24 out of 25) crossing the K-Pg boundary had representatives living in freshwater or brackish environments ranging from those living exclusively in freshwater to marine groups that had occasional freshwater/brackish representatives. The reason for this discrepancy in victims of this mass extinction most likely lies in how their food webs are structured. Marine food chains, particularly those of the open ocean, have phytoplankton at the base of the food chain, which was drastically affected by the darkening of the atmosphere from the asteroid impact and which ultimately had a domino effect on the rest of the ecosystems until it hit the apex predators [264]. This is supported by the documented decline in pelagic plankton after the K-Pg boundary [265], which agrees well with the disappearance of pelagic predatory fish.
The food webs of freshwater ecosystems in contrast, rely on detritus, which continues to function regardless of the potential for photosynthesis being diminished. Supporting this further, the two families of fishes that were not strictly marine that perished during the K-Pg extinction event had representatives that would have been planktivorous, e.g., the mawsoniid sarcopterygians and aspidorhynchid actinopterygians [10,266]. Coastal marine and brackish habitats would also be able to weather the extinction event better as they also had access to the detritus from river systems that flowed into the ocean [264]. Since pycnodonts not only occupied numerous freshwater ecosystems at the boundary but were predominantly present in coastal habitats such as reefs, this could be one particular factor for why they survived the K-Pg extinction event while many other marine fish clades were wiped out.
4. Conclusions
Pycnodonts were a predominantly marine group that were especially prevalent in structured habitats such as reefs from the Norian (Late Triassic) to the Ypresian (middle Eocene, Mid-Palaeogene) spanning an evolutionary history of ca. 170 Ma [42]. Nevertheless, they seemingly made numerous incursions into brackish and even freshwater habitats throughout their evolutionary history starting in the Jurassic, but particularly during the Cretaceous. The last freshwater occurrences coincide with those from marine deposits [42,250]. The occurrence in the Lutetian Lisbon Formation of the Claiborne Group in Alabama, USA [250] could even indicate that pycnodonts survived longer in freshwater than in seawater, if the stratigraphic assignment is correct. However, despite the repeatedly incursion into continental environments, pycnodontiform seemingly never became permanent inhabitants of freshwater environments like more ancient clades e.g., Lepisosteiformes and Amiiformes.
The marine to freshwater transition of pycnodonts appeared to be more similar to that seen in younger marine derived fish clades today, such as silversides, drums, needlefishes, anchovies and pufferfishes [267,268,269], where a mostly marine clade made numerous incursions into freshwater habitats throughout their evolution but had the bulk of their diversity present in marine habitats. The freshwater fossil record of pycnodontiforms is, for the most part, very fragmentary, represented by isolated dental remains. Only a few taxa from the Cretaceous are preserved as fully articulated specimens. This is an issue for most freshwater fish fossils as certain habitats, particularly fluvial, are hostile to fossilisation due to the high energy movements of currents. However, despite these limitations, there are certain clues about ecology and life history that can be deducted from certain taxa and their occurrences such as pycnodontiforms from the Early Cretaceous of Spain [121] and Hungary [198,200] being permanent freshwater residents due to the wide range of body and tooth plate sizes, respectively, being present in the same locality indicating the simultaneous presence of juveniles and adults, whereas other pycnodont taxa migrated to freshwaters to reproduce, while otherwise living in marine environments as seen in cf. Phacodus [45], and finally, possible niche partitioning as seen in the Kem Kem pycnodont assemblage [47].
Our review of the freshwater pycnodont fossil record is far from being complete assuming it to be rather incomplete due to taphonomic processes and insufficient data. But yet with such limited data, fascinating and tantalizing glimpses has already been obtained from these specimens. Renewed collection effort in freshwater localities as well as the discovery of new fossil sites combined with isotopic analyses should assist immensely in not only discovering further the extent of pycnodont diversity in non-marine environs but hopefully shed further light on evolutionary questions concerning both extinct and extant clades of freshwater fishes and how they came to dominate the rivers and lakes of the world.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, J.J. Cawley and J. Kriwet; writing—original draft preparation, J.J. Cawley.; writing—review and editing, J. Kriwet. Both authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Data Availability Statement
All data used for this review is provided in the main body of the text.
Acknowledgments
This work is the result of many years of research into pycnodontiform fishes. Many people contributed to the various studies by providing access to collections under their care. It is impossible to name all and we apologize to everybody who is missing in the following list: G. Arratia and H.-P. Schultze (formerly Natural History Museum Berlin, Germany, now Biodiversität Institute & Natural History Museum, The University of Kansas); G. Bergér (Museum Bergér, Eichstätt, Germany); R. Böttcher (now retired) and E. Maxwell (Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde, Stuttgart, Germany); the late P. Forey, A. Longbottom (now retired), Z. Johanson, and E. Bernard (The Natural History Museum London, UK); M.A. Herrero (Museo Paleontológico de Galve, Spain); M. Kölbl-Ebert and C. Ifrim (Jura-Museum Eichstätt, Germany); the late M. Mäuser and O. Wings (Naturkunde Museum Bamberg, Germany); W. Munk (Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Karlsruhe, Germany); O.W.M. Rauhut, M. Kölbl, W. Werner (now retired), and M. Krings (all Bayerische Staatssammlung für Geologie und Paläontologie), who are all acknowledged for supporting our research. Finally, we would like to thank the reviewers of the present work for the comments and valuable insights. Open Access Funding was provided by the Library of the University of Vienna.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest
Appendix A. Taxonomy, affinities and palaeogeographic distribution of nonmarine pycnodontiforms in stratigraphic order from oldest to youngest.
| Taxa | Family | Country | Locality | Period | Stage | Ref. |
| cf. Gyrodus | Gyrodontidae | Thailand | Khlong Min Formation (Mab Ching) | Middle-Late Jurassic | Unknown | [21] |
| Tibetodus gyroides | Family incertae sedis | China | Tibet | Late Jurassic | Unknown | [25,26] |
| Pycnodontoidea gen et spp. indet | Family incertae sedis | USA | Morrison Formation, Dinosaur National Monument | Late Jurassic | Oxfordian-Tithonian | [27] |
| cf. Pycnodus | Pycnodontidae | Ethiopia | Abay Gorge, Mugher Mudstone | Late Jurassic | ?Kimmeridgian-Tithonian | [39] |
| Congopycnodus cornutus | Family incertae sedis | Democratic Republic of Congo | Stanleyville | Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous | Kimmeridgian-Valanginian | [32] |
| ?Pycnodontiformes indet. (tooth morphotype 2) | Family incertae sedis | France | Champblanc Quarry, Cherves-de-Cognac | Early Cretaceous | Berriasian | [77] |
| aff. Gyrodus (tooth morphotype 6) | Gyrodontidae | France | Champblanc Quarry, Cherves-de-Cognac | Early Cretaceous | Berriasian | [77] |
| cf. Arcodonichthys (tooth morphotype 7) | Family incertae sedis | France | Champblanc Quarry, Cherves-de-Cognac | Early Cretaceous | Berriasian | [77,80] |
| Pycnodontiformes indet. (tooth morphotype 8) | Family incertae sedis | France | Champblanc Quarry, Cherves-de-Cognac | Early Cretaceous | Berriasian | [77] |
| Pycnodontidae gen. et spp. Indet (tooth morphotype 9) | Pycnodontidae | France | Champblanc Quarry, Cherves-de-Cognac | Early Cretaceous | Berriasian | [77] |
| Pycnodontidae gen. et spp. Indet (tooth morphotype 10) | Pycnodontidae | France | Champblanc Quarry, Cherves-de-Cognac | Early Cretaceous | Berriasian | [77] |
| Pycnodontidae gen. et spp. Indet (tooth morphotype 11) | Family incertae sedis | France | Champblanc Quarry, Cherves-de-Cognac | Early Cretaceous | Berriasian | [77] |
| Coelodus | Pycnodontidae | England | Lulworth Formation | Early Cretaceous | Berriasian | [26,49] |
| Coelodus** | Pycnodontidae | England | Durlston Formation | Early Cretaceous | Berriasian | [26,49] |
| “Pycnodus” mantelli | Pycnodontidae | Germany | Gronau, North Rhine-Westphalia | Early Cretaceous | Berriasian | [29,60] |
| “Pycnodus” mantelli | Pycnodontidae | Germany | Osterwald/Otternhagen, Lower Saxony | Early Cretaceous | Berriasian | [29,58] |
| Turbomesodon cf. arcuatus | Pycnodontidae | Germany | Bückeberg Group, Istenberg Formation | Early Cretaceous | Berriasian | [29,63] |
| Turbomesodon cf. arcuatus | Pycnodontidae | Germany | North Rhine-Westphalia | Early Cretaceous | Berriasian | [29,60,61,62] |
| Pycnodontiformes indet. | Family incertae sedis | Germany | Bückeberg Group, Fuhse Formation | Early Cretaceous | Berriasian | [29,55,56] |
| Pycnodontiformes indet. | Family incertae sedis | Germany | Bückeberg Group, Istenberg Formation | Early Cretaceous | Berriasian | [29,57] |
| Pycnodontiformes indet. | Family incertae sedis | Germany | Bückeberg Group, Oesede Formation or Istenberg Formation | Early Cretaceous | Berriasian | [29,58] |
| Pycnodontiformes indet. | Family incertae sedis | Germany | Lobber Ort, Island of Rügen | Early Cretaceous | Berriasian | [29,59] |
| Turbomesodon arcuatus | Pycnodontidae | England | Middle Purbeck Limestone | Early Cretaceous | Berriasian | [29] |
| Proscinetes sp. cf. P. bernardi | Pycnodontidae | Spain | Lérida | Early Cretaceous | Berriasian | [93,129,130,131,132] |
| Ocloedus subdiscus** | Pycnodontidae | Spain | El Montsec, Lérida | Early Cretaceous | Berriasian-Valanginian | [48,89,101] |
| Turbomesodon laevidens | Pycnodontidae | England | Middle Purbeck Limestone | Early Cretaceous | Berriasian-Valanginian | [29] |
| Ocloedus | Pycnodontidae | England | Pevensey Pit, Ashdown Brickworks quarry (Wealden Group) | Early Cretaceous | Valanginian | [50,51,53] |
| Turbomesodon microdon | Pycnodontidae | England | Grinstead Clay Formation | Early Cretaceous | Valanginian | [29] |
| cf. Anomoeodus | Pycnodontidae | Thailand | Sao Khua Formation (Phu Phan Thong) | Early Cretaceous | Hauterivian-Barremian | [21] |
| Turbomesodon multidens | Pycnodontidae | England | Weald Clay Group, Sevenoaks, Kent | Early Cretaceous | Hauterivian-Barremian | [29] |
| Arcodonichthys pasiegae | Family incertae sedis | Spain | Vega de Pas Formation, Basque-Cantabrian Basin | Early Cretaceous | Hauterivian-Barremian | [80] |
| Pycnodontiformes indet. | Family incertae sedis | Spain | El Castellamar Formation | Early Cretaceous | Berriasian-Barremian | [107] |
| Stenamara mia | Pycnodontidae | Spain | Las Hoyas | Early Cretaceous | Barremian | [118] |
| Turbomesodon praeclarus | Pycnodontidae | Spain | Las Hoyas | Early Cretaceous | Barremian | [76] |
| Coelodus* | Pycnodontidae | England | Wessex (Wealden Group) | Early Cretaceous | Barremian | [46] |
| Pycnodontiformes indet. | Family incertae sedis | England | Wessex (Wealden Group) | Early Cretaceous | Barremian | [46] |
| Pycnodontidae gen. et spp. indet | Pycnodontidae | Spain | Camarillas Formation | Early Cretaceous | Barremian | [109] |
| cf. Proscinetes | Pycnodontidae | Spain | Camarillas Formation | Early Cretaceous | Barremian | [109] |
| Coelodus | Pycnodontidae | Spain | Camarillas Formation | Early Cretaceous | Barremian | [109] |
| Anomoeodus | Pycnodontidae | Spain | Camarillas Formation | Early Cretaceous | Barremian | Kriwet, pers. obser, |
| Pycnodontiformes indet. | Family incertae sedis | Spain | Artoles Formation | Early Cretaceous | Barremian | Kriwet, pers. obser, |
| cf. Ocloedus sp. 1 | Pycnodontidae | Spain | Huérgiuna Formation | Early Cretaceous | Barremian | [44] |
| cf. Ocloedus sp. 2 | Pycnodontidae | Spain | Huérgiuna Formation | Early Cretaceous | Barremian | [44] |
| Anomoeodus nursalli | Pycnodontidae | Spain | Huérgiuna Formation | Early Cretaceous | Barremian | [44] |
| Coelodus | Pycnodontidae | Spain | Aguilón | Early Cretaceous | Barremian | [93,129,130,131,132] |
| Turbomesodon bernissartensis | Pycnodontidae | Belgium | Bernissart | Early Cretaceous | Barremian-Aptian | [75,76] |
| “Palaeobalistum” geiseri | Pycnodontidae | USA | Twin Mountains Formation, Paluxy Church | Early Cretaceous | Aptian | [141] |
| “Proscinetes” texanus | Pycnodontidae | USA | Twin Mountains Formation, Paluxy Church | Early Cretaceous | Aptian | [30,141] |
| Coelodus | Pycnodontidae | USA | Twin Mountains Formation, Paluxy Church | Early Cretaceous | Aptian | [141] |
| Thurmondella estesi | Family incertae sedis | USA | Twin Mountains Formation, Paluxy Church | Early Cretaceous | Aptian | [141,145] |
| Pycnodontidae indet. | Pycnodontidae | USA | Cloverly Formation, Little Sheep Mudstone Member | Early Cretaceous | Aptian | [133] |
| Anomoeodus complanatus | Pycnodontidae | Spain | Cintorres, Valencia | Early Cretaceous | Aptian | [93,129,130,131,132] |
| Anomoeodus complanatus | Pycnodontidae | Spain | Mirambel, Tereul | Early Cretaceous | Aptian | [93,129,130,131,132] |
| Coelodus sp. aff. C. soleri | Pycnodontidae | Spain | Morella, Valencia | Early Cretaceous | Aptian | [93,129,130,131,132] |
| aff. Gyrodus | Gyrodontidae | Tunisia | Jebel Boulouha North | Early Cretaceous | Albian | [152] |
| Thurmondella estesi | Family incertae sedis | USA | Paluxy Formation, Stephenville Printing | Early Cretaceous | Albian | [30,141] |
| Texasensis coronatus | Pycnodontidae | USA | Paluxy Formation, Pecan Valley Estates | Early Cretaceous | Albian | [30,31,141] |
| “Macromesodon” dumblei | Family incertae sedis | USA | Paluxy Formation, Pecan Valley Estates | Early Cretaceous | Albian | [30,141] |
| Nonaphalgodus trinitiensis | Pycnodontidae | USA | Antlers Formation, Butler Farm | Early Cretaceous | Albian | [30,141] |
| Anomoeodus caddoi** | Pycnodontidae | USA | Holly Creek Formation | Early Cretaceous | Albian | [137] |
| Pycnodontiformes indet.** | Family incertae sedis | USA | Holly Creek Formation | Early Cretaceous | Albian | [137] |
| ?Pycnodontiformes indet.** | Family incertae sedis | Tunisia | Oued el Khil | Early Cretaceous | Albian | [152] |
| Pycnodontiformes indet. | Family incertae sedis | Brazil | Açu Formation, Potiguar Basin | Early Cretaceous | Albian | [151] |
| Anomoeodus sp. aff. A. muensteri | Pycnodontidae | Spain | Condemios de Abajo, Castilla-La-Mancha | Early Cretaceous | Albian | [93,129,130,131,132] |
| Pycnodontiformes indet. | Family incertae sedis | Spain | Ceceda, Asturias | Early Cretaceous | Albian | [93,129,130,131,132] |
| Neoproscinetes africanus | Pycnodontidae | Morocco | Kem Kem | Early-Late Cretaceous | Albian-Cenomanian | [47] |
| cf. Macromesodon | Pycnodontidae | Morocco | Kem Kem | Early-Late Cretaceous | Albian-Cenomanian | [47] |
| Agassizilia erfoudina | ?Pycnodontidae | Morocco | Kem Kem | Early-Late Cretaceous | Albian-Cenomanian | [47] |
| cf. Coelodus | Pycnodontidae | Morocco | Kem Kem | Early-Late Cretaceous | Albian-Cenomanian | [47] |
| Coelodus soleri | Pycnodontidae | Spain | Girona, Catalonia | Early-Late Cretaceous | Albian-Cenomanian | [93,129,130,131,132] |
| Pycnodontiformes indet.** | Family incertae sedis | Brazil | Alcântara Formation, Laje do Coringa | Late Cretaceous | Cenomanian | [221,223] |
| Pycnodontiformes indet.** | Family incertae sedis | Algeria | Continental Intercalaire, Guir Basin | Late Cretaceous | Cenomanian | [238] |
| Pycnodontidae gen. et spp. Indet 1 | Pycnodontidae | USA | Cedar Mountain Formation | Late Cretaceous | Cenomanian | [214] |
| Pycnodontidae gen. et spp. Indet 2 | Pycnodontidae | USA | Cedar Mountain Formation | Late Cretaceous | Cenomanian | [214] |
| Coelodus | Pycnodontidae | USA | Dakota Formation | Late Cretaceous | Cenomanian | [217] |
| Coelodus | Pycnodontidae | USA | Straight Cliffs Formation, Smoky Hollow Member | Late Cretaceous | Turonian | [217] |
| Pycnodontiformes indet./Pycnodontidae indet.** | ?Pycnodontidae | Austria | Gams, Schönleiten Formation | Late Cretaceous | Turonian | [192,194] |
| Coelodus | Pycnodontidae | USA | Straight Cliffs Formation, John Henry Member | Late Cretaceous | Coniacian | [217] |
| Xinjiangodus gyrodoides | Pycnodontidae | China | Donggou Formation, Junggar Basin | Late Cretaceous | Coniacian-Campanian | [163] |
| cf. Coelodus | Pycnodontidae | Hungary | Csehbánya Formation, Iharkút | Late Cretaceous | Santonian | [198.201] |
| Micropycnodon** | Family incertae sedis | USA | Straight Cliffs Formation, John Henry Member | Late Cretaceous | Santonian | [217] |
| Pycnodontiformes indet. | Family incertae sedis | Hungary | Ajka Formation | Late Cretaceous | Santonian | [203] |
| cf. Phacodus | Family incertae sedis | France | Villeveyrac - L’Olivet | Late Cretaceous | Campanian | [45] |
| Micropycnodon** | Family incertae sedis | USA | Wahweap Formation | Late Cretaceous | Campanian | [217] |
| Pycnodontidae gen. et spp. indet | Pycnodontidae | Bolivia | Chaunaca Formation | Late Cretaceous | Campanian | [232] |
| Pycnodontoidea gen. et spp. indet | Family incertae sedis | Spain | Lo Hueco (Cuenca) | Late Cretaceous | Campanian-Maastrichtian | [208,209,210,211] |
| Pycnodus lametae | Pycnodontidae | India | Lameta Formation (Maharashtra) | Late Cretaceous | Maastrichtian | [168,169,174] |
| cf. Coelodus** | Family incertae sedis | Spain | Els Neret | Late Cretaceous | Maastrichtian | [212] |
| cf. Coelodus** | Family incertae sedis | Spain | L’Espinau | Late Cretaceous | Maastrichtian | [212] |
| Pycnodontiformes indet.** | Family incertae sedis | Spain | Serrat del Rostiar-1 | Late Cretaceous | Maastrichtian | [212] |
| Pycnodontiformes indet.** | Family incertae sedis | Spain | Cami del Soldat | Late Cretaceous | Maastrichtian | [212] |
| Pycnodontiformes indet.** | Family incertae sedis | Spain | Fontllonga-6 | Late Cretaceous | Maastrichtian | [212] |
| ?Pycnodontiformes indet.** | Family incertae sedis | Spain | Fontllonga-6 | Late Cretaceous | Maastrichtian | [212] |
| ?Pycnodontiformes indet.** | Family incertae sedis | Spain | L’Espinau | Late Cretaceous | Maastrichtian | [212] |
| Pycnodontidae gen. et spp. indet | Pycnodontidae | India | Madhya Pradesh (Kisalpuri) | Late Cretaceous | Maastrichtian | [180] |
| Pycnodontidae gen. et spp. indet | Pycnodontidae | India | Lameta Formation (Pisdura) | Late Cretaceous | Maastrichtian | [169,175,176] |
| Pycnodus bicresta | Pycnodontidae | India | Naskal, Andhra Pradesh | Late Cretaceous | Maastrichtian | [181,182] |
| Pycnodontidae gen. et spp. indet** | Pycnodontidae | India | Chhindwara District, Madhya Pradesh | Late Cretaceous | Maastrichtian | [186] |
| Pycnodus | Pycnodontidae | India | Papro Formation, Uttar Pradesh | Late Cretaceous | Maastrichtian | [177] |
| “Pycnodus” lametae*** | Pycnodontidae | India | Naskal, Andhra Pradesh | Late Cretaceous | Maastrichtian | [183] |
| Pycnodus | Pycnodontidae | India | Lameta Formation (Madhya Pradesh) | Late Cretaceous | Maastrichtian | [178,179] |
| Pycnodus bicresta | Pycnodontidae | India | Asifabad | Late Cretaceous | Maastrichtian | [169,176,185,186] |
| Pycnodus lametae | Pycnodontidae | India | Nagpur | Late Cretaceous | Maastrichtian | [184] |
| Pycnodus lametae | Pycnodontidae | India | Asifabad | Late Cretaceous | Maastrichtian | [184,185] |
| Pycnodus lametae | Pycnodontidae | India | Rangapur | Late Cretaceous | Maastrichtian | [184] |
| Pycnodus cf. P. praecursor | Pycnodontidae | India | Asifabad | Late Cretaceous | Maastrichtian | [184] |
| Coelodus toncoensis** | Pycnodontidae | Argentina | Yacoraite Formation | Late Cretaceous | Maastrichtian | [224,225,226,227,228] |
| Pycnodontiformes indet.** | Family incertae | Argentina | Yacoraite Formation | Late Cretaceous | Maastrichtian | [231] |
| Coelodus toncoensis** | Pycnodontidae | Bolivia | El Molino Formation, Paja Patcha | Late Cretaceous | Maastrichtian | [234,235,236] |
| Coelodus** | Pycnodontidae | Bolivia | El Molino Formation, Paja Patcha | Late Cretaceous | Maastrichtian | [235] |
| Pycnodontidae gen. et spp. indet** | Pycnodontidae | Bolivia | El Molino Formation, Paja Patcha | Late Cretaceous | Maastrichtian | [234,235] |
| Pycnodontidae gen. et spp. indet** | Pycnodontidae | Bolivia | El Molino Formation, Vila Vascarra | Late Cretaceous | Maastrichtian | [237] |
| Coelodus | Pycnodontidae | Madagascar | Maevarano Formation, Anembalemba Member | Late Cretaceous | Maastrichtian | [242] |
| Pycnodus jonesae** | Pycnodontidae | Mali | Ménaka Formation, Iullemmeden Basin | Late Cretaceous | Maastrichtian | [239,240] |
| Pycnodus** | Pycnodontidae | Mali | Ménaka Formation, Iullemmeden Basin | Late Cretaceous | Maastrichtian | [239,240] |
| Pycnodus | Pycnodontidae | India | Jhilmili, Chhindwara District | Late Cretaceous-Palaeocene | Maastrichtian-Danian | [191] |
| Pycnodus** | Pycnodontidae | India | Fatehgarh Formation, Rajasthan | Late Cretaceous-Palaeocene | Maastrichtian-Selandian | [189,190] |
| Coelodus toncoensis** | Pycnodontidae | Argentina | Yacoraite Formation | Palaeocene | Danian | [225] |
| Pycnodontidae gen. et spp. indet** | Pycnodontidae | India | Rajahmundry | Palaeocene | Danian | [169,247,248] |
| Pycnodus cf. P. praecursor** | Pycnodontidae | India | Rajahmundry | Palaeocene | Danian | [184] |
| Pycnodus** | Pycnodontidae | India | Rajahmundry | Palaeocene | Danian | [184] |
| Pycnodus jonesae** | Pycnodontidae | Mali | Teberemt Formation, Gao Trench Basin | Palaeocene | Selandian-Thanetian | [239,240] |
| Pycnodus jonesae** | Pycnodontidae | Mali | Teberemt Formation, Iullemmeden Basin | Palaeocene | Thanetian | [239,240] |
| Pycnodus** | Pycnodontidae | Mali | Teberemt Formation, Iullemmeden Basin | Palaeocene | Thanetian | [240] |
| Pycnodus maliensis** | Pycnodontidae | Mali | Tamaguélelt Formation, Taoudenit Basin | Eocene | Ypresian | [239,240] |
| Pycnodus zeaformis** | Pycnodontidae | Mali | Tamaguélelt Formation, Taoudenit Basin | Eocene | Ypresian | [239,240] |
| Pycnodus** | Pycnodontidae | Mali | Tamaguélelt Formation, Taoudenit Basin | Eocene | Ypresian | [240] |
| Pycnodus** | Pycnodontidae | USA | Tallahata Formation | Eocene | Ypresian-Lutetian | [250] |
| Pycnodus** | Pycnodontidae | USA | Lisbon Formation | Eocene | Lutetian | [250] |
References
- Reid, G.M. Introduction to Freshwater Fishes and Their Conservation. Int. Zoo Yearb. 2013, 47, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oberdoff, T.; Guégan, J.; Hugueny, B. Global scale patterns of fish species richness in rivers. Ecography 1995, 18, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amarasinghe, U.S.; Welcomme, R.L. An Analysis of Fish Species Richness in Natural Lakes. Environ. Biol. Fishes 2002, 65, 327–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horne, A.J.; Goldman, C. Limnology; McGraw-Hill: University of Minnesota, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Boyd, C.E. Water Quality: An Introduction, 2nd ed.; Springer: Auburn, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Dodds, W.K.; Whiles, M.R. Freshwater ecology: concepts and environmental applications of limnology; 2nd ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Lundberg, J.G. The temporal context for the diversification of neotropical fishes. In Phylogeny and Classification of Neotropical Fishes; Malabarba, L.R., Reis, R.E., Vari, R.P., Lucena, C.A.S., Lucena, Z.M.S., Eds.; EDIPUCRS: University of California, USA, 1998; pp. 49–68. [Google Scholar]
- Berra, T.M. An atlas of distribution of the freshwater fish families of the world; University of Nebraska Press: Lincoln, USA, 1981. [Google Scholar]
- McDowall, R.M. The occurrence and distribution of diadromy among fishes. Am Fish Soc Symp 1987, 1, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
- Cavin, L. Freshwater fishes: 250 million years of evolutionary history; ISTE Press Ltd.: London, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Patterson, C. The distribution of mesozoic freshwater fishes, Biogéographie et liaisons intercontinentales au cours du Mésozoïque. Mém Mus Natl Hist 1975, 11, 156–174. [Google Scholar]
- Bogan, S.; Taverne, L.; Agnolin, F. First triassic and oldest record of a South American amiiform fish: Caturus sp. from the Los Menucos Group (lower Upper Triassic), Rio Negro province, Argentina. Geol Belg 2013, 16, 191–195. [Google Scholar]
- Cavin, L. Diversity of Mesozoic semionotiform fishes and the origin of gars (Lepisosteidae). Sci. Nat. 2010, 97, 1035–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Egerton, P.d.M.G. XXXV. On chondrosteus, an extinct genus of the sturionidæ, found in the lias formation at Lyme Regis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 1858, 148, 871–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hilton E., J.; Grande, L.; Bemis, W.E. Morphology of †Coccolepis bucklandi Agassiz, 1843 (Actinopterygii, †Coccolepidae) from the Solnhofen Lithographic Limestone deposits (Upper Jurassic, Germany). In Mesozoic Fishes 3 – Systematics, Paleoenvironments and Biodiversity; Arratia, G., Tintori, A., Eds.; Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil: Munich, Germany, 2004; pp. 209–238. [Google Scholar]
- Cawley, J.J.; Marramà, G.; Carnevale, G.; Villafaña, J.A.; López-Romero, F.A.; Kriwet, J. Rise and fall of †Pycnodontiformes: Diversity, competition and extinction of a successful fish clade. Ecol Evol 2021, 11, 1769–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nursall, J.R. The case of pycnodont fishes as the fossil sister-group of teleosts. In Origin and phylogenetic interrelationships of teleosts; Nelson, J.S., Schultze, H.P., Wilson, M.V.H., Eds.; Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil: Munich, Germany, 2010; Volume 121, pp. 329–343. [Google Scholar]
- Poyato-Ariza, F.J. Studies on pycnodont fishes (I): evaluation of their phylogenetic position among actinopterygians. 2015; 37–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kriwet, J. A comprehensive study of pycnodont fishes (Neopterygii, Pycnodontiformes): morphology, taxonomy, functional morphology, phylogeny, and palaeobiogeography. Unpublished PhD thesis, Humboldt University, Berlin, 2001.
- Poyato-Ariza, F.J. Pycnodont fishes: morphologic variation, ecomorphologic plasticity, and a new interpretation of their evolutionary history. Bull Kitakyushu Mus Nat Hist Hum Hist, Ser A 2005, 3, 169–184. [Google Scholar]
- Cavin, L.; Deesri, U.; Suteethorn, V. The Jurassic and Cretaceous bony fish record (Actinopterygii, Dipnoi) from Thailand. In Late Palaeozoic and Mesozoic Ecosystems in SE Asia; Buffetaut, E., Cuny, G., Le Loeuff, J., Suteethorn, V., Eds.; Geological Society: London, UK, 2009; pp. 125–139. [Google Scholar]
- Buffetaut, E.; Raksaskulwong, L.; Suteethorn, V.; Tong, H. First post-Triassic temnospondyl amphibians from the Shan-Thai block: intercentra from the Jurassic of peninsular Thailand. Geol. Mag. 1994, 131, 837–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buffetaut, E.; Tong, H.; Suteethorn, V.; Raksaskulwong, L. Jurassic vertebrates from the southern peninsula of Thailand and their implications. In A preliminary report. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Stratigraphic Correlation of Southeast Asia, Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand, 15-20 November 1994; Angsuwathana, P., Wongwanich, T., Tansathien, W., Wongsomak, S., Tulyatid, S., Tulyatid, J., Eds.; Department of Mineral Resources: Bangkok, Thailand, 1994; pp. 253–256. [Google Scholar]
- Tong, H.; Buffetaut, E.; Suteethorn, V. Middle Jurassic turtles from southern Thailand. Geol. Mag. 2002, 139, 687–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Young, C.C.; Liu, H. Tibetodus, a new pycnodont fish from Changtu (in Chinese with English summary). Acta Palaeo Sin 1954, 2, 95–102. [Google Scholar]
- Schaeffer, B.; Patterson, C. Jurassic fishes from the western United States, with comments on Jurassic fish distribution. Am Mus Novit 1984, 2796, 1–86. [Google Scholar]
- Kirkland, J.I. Morrison fishes. Mod Geol 1998 22, 503–533.
- Woodward, A.S. The Fossil Fishes of the English Wealden and Purbeck Formations; Cambridge University Press (CUP): Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2014; ISBN 9781108076944. [Google Scholar]
- Hornung, J. Pycnodonte Fische (Actinopterygii: Pycnodontiformes) in der Unterkreide von Norddeutschland - Diversität und palökologische Beziehungen -- Pycnodont fishes (Actinopterygii: Pycnodontiformes) from the Lower Cretaceous of northern Germany - diversity and palecological relationships. Ber Naturwiss Ver Bielef Umgeg 2021, 58, 4–77. [Google Scholar]
- Thurmond, J.T. Lower vertebrate faunas of the Trinity Division in north-central Texas. Geosci Man 1974, 8, 103–129. [Google Scholar]
- zdikmen, H. Texasensis nom. nov., a new name for the preoccupied fossil fish genus Callodus Thurmond, 1974 (Osteichthyes: Pycnodontiformes). Mun Ent Zool 2009, 4, 616. [Google Scholar]
- Taverne, L. A horny pycnodont fish (Pycnodontiformes) in the continental Middle Jurassic (Stanleyville Formation) of the Democratic Republic of Congo. Geo-Eco-Trop 2019, 43, 25–34. [Google Scholar]
- Myers, T.S.; Tabor, N.J.; Jacobs, L.L. Late Jurassic paleoclimate of Central Africa. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclim. Palaeoecol. 2011, 311, 111–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caillaud, A.; Blanpied, C.; Delvaux, D. The Upper Jurassic Stanleyville Group of the eastern Congo Basin: An example of perennial lacustrine system. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 2017, 132, 80–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taverne, L.; Capasso, L. Gladiopycnodontidae, a new family of pycnodontiform fishes from the Late Cretaceous of Lebanon, with the description of three genera. Eur. J. Taxon. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gayet, M. Ichthyoceros spinosus nov. gen., nov. sp., du Cénomanien inférieur de Hakel (Liban) et ses affinités avec le genre Trewavasia (Pisces, Pycnodontiformes, Coccodontidae). Bull Mus Natl Hist Nat 4C 1984, 3, 287–307. [Google Scholar]
- Taverne, L.; Capasso, L. Ostéologie et phylogénie des Coccodontidae, une famille remarquable de poissons Pycnodontiformes du Crétacé supérieur marin du Liban, avec la description de deux nouveaux genres. Palaeontos 2014, 25, 3–43. [Google Scholar]
- Nursall, J.R.; Capasso, L. Gebrayelichthys (novum), an extraordinary genus of neopterygian fishes from the Cenomanian of Lebanon. In Mesozoic Fishes 3: Systematics, Paleoenvironments and Biodiversity; Arratia, G., Tintori, A., Eds.; Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil: Munich, Germany, 2004; pp. 317–340. [Google Scholar]
- Goodwin, M.B.; Clemens, W.A.; Hutchison, J.H.; Wood, C.B.; Zavada, M.S.; Kemp, A.; Duffin, C.J.; Schaff, C.R. Mesozoic continental vertebrates with associated palynostratigraphic dates from the northwestern Ethiopian plateau. J. Vertebr. Paléontol. 1999, 19, 728–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wolela, A. Sedimentation and depositional environments of the Barremian-Cenomanian Debre Libanose Sandstone, Blue Nile (Abay) Basin, Ethiopia. Cretac. Res. 2009, 30, 1133–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Getaneh, W.; Atnafu, B. Geochemistry and lithostratigraphy of the mugher mudstone: Insights into the late jurassic-early cretaceous clastic sedimentation in Ethiopia and its surroundings. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 2020, 164, 103770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cawley, J.J.; Marrama, G.; Carnevale, G.; Kriwet, J. A quantitative approach to determine the taxonomic identity and ontogeny of the pycnodontiform fish Pycnodus (Neopterygii, Actinopterygii) from the Eocene of Bolca Lagerstätte, Italy. PeerJ 2018, 6, e4809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cuny, G. 2002. Requins d'eau douce, actuels et fossiles. PSci 2002, 295, 30–36. [Google Scholar]
- Kriwet, J. Pycnodont fishes. In Mesozoic Fishes 2: Systematics and Fossil Record; Arratia, G., Schultze, H.P., Eds.; Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfiel: Munich, Germany, 1999; pp. 215–238. [Google Scholar]
- Cavin, L.; Garcia, G.; Valentin, X. A minute freshwater pycnodont fish from the Late Cretaceous of southern France: Palaeoecological implications. Cretac. Res. 2020, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sweetman, S.C.; Goedert, J.; Martill, D.M. A preliminary account of the fishes of the Lower Cretaceous Wessex Formation (Wealden Group, Barremian) of the Isle of Wight, southern England. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2014, 113, 872–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cooper, S.L.; Martill, D.M. A diverse assemblage of pycnodont fishes (Actinopterygii, Pycnodontiformes) from the mid-Cretaceous, continental Kem Kem Group of south-east Morocco. Cretac. Res. 2020, 112, 104456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poyato-Ariza, F.J.; Wenz, S. A new insight into pycnodontiform fishes. Geodiversitas 2002, 24, 139–248. [Google Scholar]
- Coram, R.A.; Radley, J.D. Revisiting climate change and palaeoenvironments in the Purbeck Limestone Group (Tithonian – Berriasian) of Durlston Bay, southern UK. Proc. Geol. Assoc. 2021, 132, 392–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Austen, P.; Brockhurst, D.; Honeysett, K. Vertebrate fauna from Ashdown brickworks, Bexhill, east Sussex. Wealden News 2010, 8, 13–23. [Google Scholar]
- Naish, D.; Sweetman, S.C. A tiny maniraptoran dinosaur in the Lower Cretaceous Hastings Group: Evidence from a new vertebrate-bearing locality in south-east England. Cretac. Res. 2011, 32, 464–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allen, P. Wealden of the Weald: a new model. Proc. Geol. Assoc. 1975, 86, 389–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turmine-Juhel, P.; Wilks, R.; Brockhurst, D.; Austen, P.A.; Duffin, C.J.; Benton, M.J. Microvertebrates from the Wadhurst Clay Formation (Lower Cretaceous) of Ashdown Brickworks, East Sussex, UK. Proc. Geol. Assoc. 2019, 130, 752–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hayward, R.J. The Geology of part of the Wadhurst Clay Formation and part of the Tunbridge Wells Formation at the Ashdown Brickworks, Bexhill, Sussex. Unpublished B.Sc. dissertation, University of Greenwich, London, 1996.
- Struckmann, C. Die Wealdenbildungen von Sehnde bei Lehrte. Neues Jahrb Mineral Geol Palaeontol 1891, 1891, 117–131. [Google Scholar]
- Jordan, R. Die Ziegeleitongrube westlich Wätzum, Blatt Sarstedt, an der Ostflanke des Salzstockes von Sarstedt-Lehrte (Dogger, Wealden, marine Unterkreide). Ber Naturhist Ges Hann 1959, 104, 5–24. [Google Scholar]
- Struckmann, C. Geognostische Studien am Deister. Jahresber Naturhist Ges Hann 1880, 29/30, 60–75.
- Dunker, W. Monographie der Norddeutschen Wealdenbildung. Ein Beitrag zur Geognosie und Naturgeschichte der Vorwelt. Oehme und Müller: Rome, Italy, 1846; 83 pp.
- Ansorge, J. Fischreste (Selachii, Actinopterygii) aus der Wealdentonscholle von Lobber Ort (Mönchgut/Rügen/DDR). PalZ 1990, 64, 133–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nyhuis, C.; Herbig, H.G. Ichthyolithe aus dem Berriasium von Gronau/Westfalen (westliches niedersächsisches Kreidebecken) – Rekonstruktion einer trophischen Kette aus sturmkondensierten Bonebeds. Terra Nostra 2009, 2009, 85. [Google Scholar]
- Kemper, E. Geologischer Führer durch die Grafschaft Bentheim und die angrenzenden Gebiete. 3rd edition. Verlag Heimatverein der Grafschaft Bentheim: Nordhorn, Germany, 1968; 172 pp.
- Kemper, E. Geologischer Führer durch die Grafschaft Bentheim und die angrenzenden Gebiete mit Abriss einem der emsländischen Unterkreide. Verlag Heimatverein der Grafschaft Bentheim: Nordhorn, Germany, 1976; 206 pp.
- Kriwet, J. A comprehensive study of the skull and dentition of pycnodont fishes. Zitteliana 2005, 45, 135–188. [Google Scholar]
- Olive, S.; Taverne, L.; López-Arbarello, A. A new genus of coccolepidid actinopterygian from the Cretaceous Iguanodon-bearing locality of Bernissart, Belgium. Cretac. Res. 2018, 95, 318–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cavin, L.; Deesri, U.; Olive, S. Scheenstia bernissartensis (Actinopterygii: Ginglymodi) from the Early Cretaceous of Bernissart, Belgium, with an appraisal of ginglymodian evolutionary history. J Syst Palaeontol 2020, 18, 513–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cornet, J.; Schmitz, G. Note sur les puits naturels du terrain houiller du Hainaut et le gisement des iguanodons de Bernissart-Bull. Bull Soc belge Géol Paléontol Hydrol 1898, 12, 301–318. [Google Scholar]
- Cornet, J. L’époque wealdienne dans le Hainaut. Bull Soc belge Géol Paléontol Hydrol 1927, 50, 89–104. [Google Scholar]
- Yans, J. Lithostratigraphie, minéralogie et diagenèse des sédiments à faciès wealdien du Bassin de Mons (Belgique). Académie royale de Belgique: Brussels, Belgium, 2007; 179 pp.
- Schnyder, J.; Dejax, J.; Keppens, E.; Tu, T.T.N.; Spagna, P.; Boulila, S.; Galbrun, B.; Riboulleau, A.; Tshibangu, J.-P.; Yans, J. An Early Cretaceous lacustrine record: Organic matter and organic carbon isotopes at Bernissart (Mons Basin, Belgium). Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclim. Palaeoecol. 2009, 281, 79–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spagna, P. Les faciès wealdiens du Bassin de Mons (Belgique): paléoenvironnements, géodynamique et valorisation industrielle. Unpublished PhD thesis, Faculté Polytechnique de l'Umons, Mons, 2010.
- Spagna, P.; Yans, J.; Schnyder, J.; Dupuis, C. The Paleoenvironment of the Bernissart Iguanodons: Sedimentological Analysis of the Lower Cretaceous Wealden Facies in the Bernissart Area. In Bernissart Dinosaurs and Early Terrestrial Ecosystems; Godefroit, P., Ed.; Indiana University Press: Bloomington, USA, 2012; pp. 87–96. [Google Scholar]
- Dejax, J.; Pons, D.; Yans, J. Palynology of the dinosaur-bearing Wealden facies in the natural pit of Bernissart (Belgium). Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 2007, 144, 25–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yans, J.; Dejax, J.; Pons, D.; Taverne, L.; Bultynck, P. The iguanodons of Bernissart (Belgium) are middle Barremian to earliest Aptian in age. Bull Inst R Sci Nat Belg Sci Terre 2006, 76, 91–95. [Google Scholar]
- Yans, J.; Dejax, J.; Schnyder, J. On the age of the Bernissart Iguanodons. In Bernissart Dinosaurs and Early Terrestrial Ecosystems; Godefroit, P., Ed.; Indiana University Press: Bloomington, USA, 2012; pp. 79–86. [Google Scholar]
- Traquair, R.H. Les poissons wealdiens de Bernissart. Mém Mus R Hist Nat Belg 1911, 6, 1–65. [Google Scholar]
- Poyato-Ariza, F.J.; Wenz, S. The new pycnodontid fish genus Turbomesodon, and a revision of Macromesodon based on new material from the Lower Cretaceous of Las Hoyas, Cuenca, Spain. In Mesozoic Fishes 3: Systematics, Paleoenvironments and Biodiversity; Arratia, G., Tintori, A., Eds.; Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil: Munich, Germany, 2004; pp. 341–378. [Google Scholar]
- Pouech, J.; Mazin, J.-M.; Cavin, L.; Poyato-Ariza, F.J. A Berriasian actinopterygian fauna from Cherves-de-Cognac, France: Biodiversity and palaeoenvironmental implications. Cretac. Res. 2015, 55, 32–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazin, J.M.; Pouech, J.; Hantzpergue, P.; Lenglet, T. The Purbeckian site of Cherves-de-Cognac (Berriasian, Early Cretaceous, SW France): a first synthesis. In Mid-Mesozoic Life and Environments Symposium, Cognac, France, 24-28 June 2008; Mazin, J.M., Pouech, J., Hantzpergue, P., Lacombe, V.., Eds.; Documents des Laboratoires de Géologie de Lyon: Cognac, France, 2008; pp. 68–71. [Google Scholar]
- Pouech, J. Position des mammifères dans les écosystèmes mésozoïques d'Europe Occidentale: le gisement de Cherves-de-Cognac (Berriasien, Charente, France). Unpublished PhD thesis, Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, Lyon, 2008.
- Poyato-Ariza, F.J.; Bermúdez-Rochas, D.D. New pycnodont fish (Arcodonichthys pasiegaegen. et sp. nov.) from the Early Cretaceous of the Basque-Cantabrian Basin, northern Spain. J. Vertebr. Paléontol. 2009, 29, 271–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cooper, S.L.; Martill, D.M. Pycnodont fishes (Actinopterygii, Pycnodontiformes) from the Upper Cretaceous (lower Turonian) Akrabou Formation of Asfla, Morocco. Cretac. Res. 2020, 116, 104607–104607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pouech, J.; Amiot, R.; Lécuyer, C.; Mazin, J.-M.; Martineau, F.; Fourel, F. Oxygen isotope composition of vertebrate phosphates from Cherves-de-Cognac (Berriasian, France): Environmental and ecological significance. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclim. Palaeoecol. 2014, 410, 290–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kriwet, J. Dental morphology of the pycnodontid fish †Stemmatodus rhombus (Agassiz 1844) (Neopterygii, {Pycnodontiformes) f rom the Early Cretaceous, with comments on its systematic position. Trans R Soc Edinb Earth Sci 2004, 94, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bermúdez-Rochas, D.D.; Delvene, G.; Moratalla, J.; Hernán, J.; De La Fuente, M. Primeros datos paleontológicos del yacimiento del Cretácico Inferior Vega de Pas 1 (Cuenca Vasco-Cantábrica, Cantabria, España). In II Semana de Jóvenes Investigadores del IGME; Bermúdez, D.D., Najarro, M., Quesada, C., Eds.; Publicaciones del Instituto Geológico y Minero de España: Madrid, Spain, 2007; pp. 23–28. [Google Scholar]
- Darras, L.P.G. The evolution of macroecological consequences of grazing and shell-crushing in fishes. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Leicester, Leicester, 2012.
- Kriwet, J. Feeding mechanisms and ecology of pycnodont fishes (Neopterygii, Pycnodontiformes). Foss. Rec. 2001, 4, 139–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kriwet, J. Late Jurassic elasmobranch and actinopterygian fishes from Portugal and Spain. Cuad Geol Ibérica 1998, 24, 241–260. [Google Scholar]
- Gómez-Alba, J. Catálogo razonado de los vertebrados fósiles de España del Museo de Geología de Barcelona (1882-1982). Treb Mus Geol Barc 1997, 6, 1–296. [Google Scholar]
- Kriwet, J.; Poyato-Ariza, F.J.; Wenz, S. A revision of the pycnodontid fish Coelodus subdiscus Wenz 1989, from the Early Cretaceous of Montsec (Lleida, Spain). Treb Mus Geol Barc 1999, 8, 33–65. [Google Scholar]
- Vidal, L.M. Nota sobre la presencia del tramo Kimeridgense en el Montsech (Lérida) y hallazgo de un batracio en sus hiladas. Mems R Acad Cienc Artes Barcelona 1902, 4, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Peybernés, B.; Oertli, H. La série de passage du Jurassique au Crétacé dans le Bassin sud-pyrénéen (Espagne). C R Acad Sci 1972, 274, 3348–3351. [Google Scholar]
- Brenner, P. Ostracoden und Charophyten des spanischen Wealden (Systematik, Gkologie, Stratigraphie, Palaogeographie). Palaeontogr A 1976, 152, 113–201. [Google Scholar]
- Gomez Pallerola, J.E. Nuevas aportaciones a la ictiofauna y a la flora del Neocomiense del Montsech de Rubies (Lérida). Bol Geol Min 1982, 93, 199–213. [Google Scholar]
- Gomez Pallerola, J.E. Nuevos Hybodóntidos del Cretácio Inferior de Santa Maria de Meyá (Lérida). Bol Geol Min 1985, 96, 372–380. [Google Scholar]
- Gomez Pallerola, J.E. Nota sobre los tiburones hybodontos de las calizas litográficas del Cretácio Inferior del Motsech (Lérida). Bol Geol Min 1992, 103, 783–813. [Google Scholar]
- Wenz, S. Note preliminaire sur la faune ichthyologique du Jurassique superieur du Montsech (Espagne). BSGF - Earth Sci. Bull. [CrossRef]
- Wenz, S. Les Amiidés (Pisces, Halecomorphi) du Crétacé inférieur du Montsec (province de Lérida, Espagne): Amiopsis woodwardi (Sauvage, 1903). Quaderns Institut d’Estudis Ilerdencs 1988, 1, 1–50. [Google Scholar]
- Wenz, S. Peixos del Cretaci Inferior de la Serra del Montsec (Espanya). In Les calcàries litogràfiques del Cretaci inferior del Montsec. Deu anys de campanyes paleontològiques; Martínez-Delclòs, X., Ed.; Institut d'Estudis Ilerdencs: Lleida, Spain, 1991; pp. 111–132. [Google Scholar]
- Poyato-Ariza, F.J. Teleósteos primitivos del Cretácico inferior español: órdenes Elopiformes y Gonorhynchiformes. Unpublished. PhD Thesis, Universidad Autónoma, Madrid, 1991. [Google Scholar]
- Wenz, S.; Poyato-Ariza, F.J. Les actinoptérygiens juvéniles du Crétacé inférieur du Montsec et de Las Hoyas (Espagne). Geobios 1994, 27, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wenz, S. Une nouvelle espèce de Coelodus (Pisces, Pycnodontiformes) du Crétacé inférieur du Montsech (Province de Lérida, Espagne): Coelodus subdiscus n. sp. Geobios 1989, 22, 515–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martínez-Delclos, X.; Nel, A. Arthropods. In Motsec and Montral-Alcover, Two Konservat-Lagerstätten, Catalonia, Spain; Martínez-Delclos, X., Ed.; Institut d'Estudis Ilerdencs: Lleida, Spain, 1995; pp. 39–46. [Google Scholar]
- de Gibert, J.; Fregenal-Martı́nez, M.; Buatois, L.; Mángano, M. Trace fossils and their palaeoecological significance in Lower Cretaceous lacustrine conservation deposits, El Montsec, Spain. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclim. Palaeoecol. 2000, 156, 89–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schairer, G.; Janicke, V. Sedimentologisch-paläontologische Untersuchungen an den Plattenkalken der Sierra de Montsech (Prov. Lérida. NE-Spanien). Neues Jahrb Geol Paläont Abh 1970, 135, 171–189. [Google Scholar]
- Schultze, H.P. The fossil record of the intertidal zone. In Intertidal fishes: Life in two worlds; Horn, M.H., Martin, K.L.M., Chotkowski, M.A., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, 1999; pp. 373–392. [Google Scholar]
- Cuenca-Bescós, G.; Amo, O.; Aurell, M.; Buscalioni, A.D.; Canudo, J.I.; Laplana, C.; Pérez Oñate, J.; Ruiz Omeñaca, J.I.; Sanz, J.L.; Soria, A.R. Los vertebrados del tránsito Jurásico-Cretácico de Galve (Teruel). In Comunicaciones de las X Jornadas Paleontología, Madrid, Spain, 3-; Sociedad Española de Paleontología, Madrid, Spain, 1994; pp. 50–53. 5 November.
- Sánchez-Hernández, B.; Benton, M.J.; Naish, D. Dinosaurs and other fossil vertebrates from the Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous of the Galve area, NE Spain. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 2007, 249, 180–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Díaz, M.; Yébenes, A. La sedimentación litoral y continental durante el Cretácico Inferior. Sinclinal de Galve, Teruel. Estud Geol 1987, 43, 3–21. [Google Scholar]
- Soria, A.R.; Meléndez, A.; Cuenca-Bescós, G.; Canudo, J.I.; Liesa, C.L. Los sistemas lacustres del Cretácico Inferior de la Cordillera Ibérica Central: la Cubeta de Aliaga. In XIII Congreso Español de Sedimentología. Guía de Excursiones, Zaragoza, Spain, 28-30 June 1995; Meléndez, A., Aurell, M., Eds.; Universidad de Zaragoza: Zaragoza, Spain, 1995; pp. 91–141. [Google Scholar]
- Kriwet, J. Neoselachier (Pisces, Elasmobranchii) aus der Unterkreide (unteres Barremium) von Galve und Alcaine (Spanien, Provinz Teruel). Palaeo Ichthyol 1999, 9, 113–142. [Google Scholar]
- Henkel, S.; Krebs, B. Zwei Säugetier-Unterkiefer aus der Unteren Kreide von Uña (Prov. Cuenca, Spanien). Neues Jahrb Geol Paläont Mh 1969, 1969, 449–463. [Google Scholar]
- Krebs, B. The search for Mesozoic Mammals in Spain and Portugal. Mesozoic Vert Life 1980, 1, 23–25. [Google Scholar]
- Krebs, B. The Barremian vertebrate locality Uña (Province of Cuenca) materials for a comparison with Las Hoyas. In 2nd International Symposium on Lithographic Limestones, Lleida - Cuenca (Spain), Extended Abstracts, Madrid, Spain, 9-; Melendez, N., Ed.; Ediciones de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; Madrid, Spain, 1995, pp. 95–97. 16 July.
- Geyer, O.F. , Krautter, M. Die Unterkreide im Grenzgebiet von Aragonien, Neukastilien und Valencia (südwestliches Keltiberikum, Spanien). Profil 1998, 15, 163–239. [Google Scholar]
- Sanz, J.L.; Wenz, S.; Yebenes, A.; Estes, R.; Martinez-Delclos, X.; Jimenez-Fuentes, E.; Diéguez, C.; Buscalioni, A.D.; Barbadillo, L.J.; Via, L. An Early Cretaceous faunal and floral continental assemblage:Las Hoyas fossil site (Cuenca, Spain). Geobios 1988, 21, 611–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poyato-Ariza, F.J.; Wenz, S. Ichthyofauna. In Las Hoyas. A Lacustrine Konservat-Lagerstätte, Cuenca, Spain. Field trip guide book of the II International Symposium on Lithographic Limestones; Meléndez, N., Ed.; Universidad Complutense de Madrid: Madrid, Spain, 1995; pp. 43–49. [Google Scholar]
- Poyato-Ariza, F.J. Palaeoecology of the fishes from the Early Cretaceous lake of Las Hoyas Cuenca, Spain, with a hypothesis of sexual dimorphism for the Chanidae Rubiesichthys. Bull Kitakyushu Mus Nat Hist Hum Hist, Ser A 2005, 3, 153–168. [Google Scholar]
- Poyato-Ariza, F.J.; Wenz, S. A new pycnodontiform fish from the Early Cretaceous of Las Hoyas (Cuenca, Spain). BSGF - Earth Sci. Bull. 2000, 171, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poyato-Ariza, F.J.; Talbot, M.R.; Fregenal-Martı́nez, M.A.; Meléndez, N.; Wenz, S. First isotopic and multidisciplinary evidence for nonmarine coelacanths and pycnodontiform fishes: palaeoenvironmental implications. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclim. Palaeoecol. 1998, 144, 65–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wenz, S.; Poyato-Ariza, F.J. Les Actinoptérygiens juvéniles du Crétacé inférieur du Montsec et de Las Hoyas. Geobios Mem Spec 1994, 16, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wenz, S.; Poyato-Ariza, F.J. Pycnodontiform fishes from the early Cretaceous of Las Hoyas (Spain). In Extended abstracts: II International Symposium on Lithographic Limestones, Cuenca, Spain, July 1995, Cuenca, Spain, 9-; Ediciones de la Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 1995; pp. 157–161. 16 July.
- Martín-Closas, C.; Diéguez, C. Charophytes from the Lower Cretaceous of the Iberian ranges (Spain). Palaeontology 1998, 41, 1133–1152. [Google Scholar]
- Tintori, A.; Renesto, S. THE MACROSEMIIDAE (PISCES, ACTINOPTERYGII) FROM THE UPPER TRIASSIC OF LOMBARDY (N. ITALY). Riv. Ital. DI Paléontol. E Strat. 2020, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Capasso, L.L.; Abi Saad, P.; Taverne, L. Nursallia tethysensis sp. nov., a new pycnodont fish (Neopterygii:† Halecostomi) from the Cenomanian of Lebanon. Bull Inst R Sci Nat Belg Sci Terre 2009, 79, 117–136. [Google Scholar]
- Ebert, M. A new genus of Pycnodontidae (Actinopterygii) from the Upper Jurassic of France and Germany, included in a phylogeny of Pycnodontiformes. Zoo, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vullo, R.; Bardet, N.; Gheerbrant, E.; Jalil, N.-E. Multicuspid tooth morphology in a gigantic Palaeocene pycnodont fish: evolutionary and palaeoecological significance. Geol. Mag. 2019, 156, 1618–1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baines, D.C. Tooth Microwear in Fishes. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Leicester, Leicester, 2010.
- De Gibert, J.M.; Buatois, L.A.; Fregenal-Martínez, M.A.; Mángano, M.G.; Ortega, F.; Poyato-Ariza, F.J.; Wenz, S. The fish trace fossil Undichna from the Cretaceous of Spain. Palaeontology 1999, 42, 409–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bauzá Rullán, J. Contribución al conocimiento de la fauna ictiológica de Cataluña. Estud Geol 1948, 8, 241–242. [Google Scholar]
- Bauzá Rullán, J. Contribución a la fauna ictiológica de España. Brev Geol Asturica 1957, 1, 7–19. [Google Scholar]
- Bataller, J.R. Los vertebrados del Cretácico español. Not Comunic Inst Geol Miner España 1960, 60, 141–164. [Google Scholar]
- Soría, A.R. La sedimentación en las cuencas marginales del surco Ibérico durante el Cretácico Inferior y su control estructural. Unpublished PhD thesis, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, 1996.
- Oreska, M.P.; Carrano, M.T.; Dzikiewicz, K.M. Vertebrate paleontology of the Cloverly Formation (Lower Cretaceous), I: faunal composition, biogeographic relationships, and sampling. J Vertebr Paleontol 2013, 33, 264–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D'Emic, M.D.; Foreman, B.Z.; Jud, N.A.; Britt, B.B.; Schmitz, M.; Crowley, J.L. Chronostratigraphic Revision of the Cloverly Formation (Lower Cretaceous, Western Interior, USA). Bull. Peabody Mus. Nat. Hist. 2019, 60, 3–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rogers, R.R.; Brady, M.E. Origins of microfossil bonebeds: insights from the Upper Cretaceous Judith River Formation of north-central Montana. Paleobiology 2010, 36, 80–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moberly, R. Morrison, Cloverly, and Sykes Mountain formations, northern Bighorn Basin, Wyoming and Montana. GSA Bull. 1960, 71, 1137–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suarez, C.A.; Frederickson, J.; Cifelli, R.L.; Pittman, J.G.; Nydam, R.L.; Hunt-Foster, R.K.; Morgan, K. A new vertebrate fauna from the Lower Cretaceous Holly Creek Formation of the Trinity Group, southwest Arkansas, USA. PeerJ 2021, 9, e12242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frucci, M.N. 2018, Oxygen isotopic composition of aquatic reptile phosphate from the Early Cretaceous Holly Creek Formation, southern Arkansas. Unpublished B.S. Honors Thesis, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Thurmond, J.T. Lower vertebrates and paleocology of the Trinity Group (Lower Cretaceous) in North Central Texas; Southern Methodist University: Southern Methodist University, USA, 1969. [Google Scholar]
- Winkler, D.A.; Murry, P.A.; Jacobs, L.L. Vertebrate paleontology of the Trinity Group, Lower Cretaceous of central Texas. In Field guide to the vertebrate paleontology of the Trinity Group, Lower Cretaceous of central Texas; Winkler, D.A., Murry, P.A., Jacobs, L.L., Eds.; Institute for the Study of the Earth and Man: Dallas, USA, 1989; pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar]
- Winkler, D.A.; Murry, P.A.; Jacobs, L.L. Early Cretaceous (Comanchean) vertebrates of central Texas. J. Vertebr. Paléontol. 1990, 10, 95–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cifelli, R.L.; Gardner, J.D.; Nydam, R.L.; Brinkman, D.L. Additions to the vertebrate fauna of the Antlers Formation (Lower Cretaceous), Southwestern Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geol Notes 1997, 57, 124–131. [Google Scholar]
- Caughey, C.A. Depositional systems in the Paluxy Formation (Lower Cretaceous), Northeast Texas—oil, gas, and groundwater resources; Bureau of Economic Geology: Austin, USA, 1977. [Google Scholar]
- Thurmond, J.T. Cartilaginous fishes of the Trinity Group and related rocks (Lower Cretaceous) of north central Texas. Southeast Geol 1971, 13, 207–227. [Google Scholar]
- zdikmen, H.; Akbulut, A. Thurmondella nom. nov., A new name for the preoccupied genus Paramicrodon Thurmond, 1974 (Osteichtyes: Actinopterygii: Pycnodontiformes). Mun Ent Zool 2012, 7, 1280–1281. [Google Scholar]
- Costa, A.B.C.; Córdoba, V.C.; Netto, R.G.; Lima Filho, F.P. Registro faciológico e paleoambiental da transgressão que marca a passagem do Cenomaniano para o Turoniano na Bacia Potiguar, NE do Brasil. Comun Geol 2014, 101, 415–420. [Google Scholar]
- Araripe, P.T.; Feijó, F.J. Potiguar Basin; Bacia Potiguar. Bol geociênc Petrobras 1994, 8, 127–141. [Google Scholar]
- Maraschin, A.; Mizusaki, A.M.; Vasconcelos, P.M.; Hinrichs, R.; Luiz, D.E.; Dos Anjos, S. Depositional age definition of the Açu Formation (Potiguar Basin, northeastern Brazil) through 40 Ar- 39 Ar dating of early-authigenic K-feldspar overgrowths. Pesqui em Geocienc 2010, 37, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arai, M. Paleogeografia do Atlântico Sul no Aptiano: um novo modelo a partir de dados micropaleontológicos recentes. Bol geociênc Petrobras 2009, 17, e351. [Google Scholar]
- Arai, M. Aptian/Albian (Early Cretaceous) paleogeography of the South Atlantic: a paleontological perspective. Braz. J. Geol. 2014, 44, 339–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Veiga, I.M.M.G.; Bergqvist, L.P.; Brito, P.M. The fish assemblage of the Cretaceous (? Albian-Cenomanian) Açu Formation, Potiguar Basin, Northeastern Brazil. J South Am Earth Sci 2019, 93, 162–173. [Google Scholar]
- Cuny, G.; Cobbett, A.M.; Meunier, F.J.; Benton, M.J. Vertebrate microremains from the Early Cretaceous of southern Tunisia. Geobios 2010, 43, 615–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, P.E.; Benton, M.J.; Trueman, C.N.; Paterson, B.A.; Cuny, G. Palaeoenvironments of vertebrates on the southern shore of Tethys: The nonmarine Early Cretaceous of Tunisia. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclim. Palaeoecol. 2007, 243, 118–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kriwet, J.; Schmitz, L. New insight into the distribution and palaeobiology of the pycnodont fish Gyrodus. Acta Palaeontol Pol 2005, 50, 49–56. [Google Scholar]
- Srarfi, D. Biostratigraphie, biodiversité, taphonomie and paléoenvironnement des niveaux à vertébrés du Jurassique–Crétacé du Sud-Est de la Tunisie. Implications paléobiogéographiques. Unpublished PhD thesis, Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, Lyon, 2006.
- Russell, D.A. Isolated dinosaur bones and teeth from the Middle Cretaceous of the Tafilalt, Morocco. Bull Mus Natl Hist Nat 4C 1996, 18, 349–402. [Google Scholar]
- Dal Sasso, C.; Maganuco, S.; Buffetaut, E.; Mendez, M.A. New information of the skull of the enigmatic theropod Spinosaurus, with remarks on its size and affinities. J Vertebr Paleontol 2005, 25, 888–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ibrahim, N.; Sereno, P.C.; Dal Sasso, C.; Maganuco, S.; Fabri, M.; Martill, D.M.; Zouhri, S.; Myhrvold, N.; Lurino, D.A. S emiaquatic adaptations in a giant predatory dinosaur. Science 2014, 345, 1613–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sereno, P.C.; Dutheil, D.B.; Iarochene, M.; Larsson, H.C.E.; Lyon, G.H.; Magwene, P.M.; Sidor, C.A.; Varricchio, D.J.; Wilson, J.A. Predatory Dinosaurs from the Sahara and Late Cretaceous Faunal Differentiation. Science 1996, 272, 986–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martill, D.M.; Ibrahim, N. Aberrant rostral teeth of the sawfish Onchopristis numidus from the Kem Kem beds (?early Late Cretaceous) of Morocco and a reappraisal of Onchopristis in New Zealand. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 2012, 64, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ibrahim, N.; Sereno, P.C.; Varricchio, D.J.; Martill, D.M.; Dutheil, D.B.; Unwin, D.M.; Baidder, L.; Larsson, H.C.; Zouhri, S.; Kaoukaya, A. Geology and paleontology of the Upper Cretaceous Kem Kem group of eastern Morocco. ZooKeys 2020, 928, 1–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yabumoto, Y.; Uyeno, T. New material of a Cretaceous coelacanth, Mawsonia lavocati Tabaste from Morocco. Bull Natn Sci Mus Tokyo 2005, 31, 39–49. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, X.; You, J.; Jin, J.; Feng, Q.; Luo, Z.; Hu, J.; Li, Y. A minute freshwater pycnodont fish from the Late Cretaceous on the southern margin of the Junggar Basin: Palaeoecological implications. Hist. Biol. 2022, 35, 1528–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hao, Y.C.; Su, D.Y.; Yu, J. X.; Li, P.X.; Li, Y.G.; Wang, N.W.; Qi, H.; Guan, S.Z.; Hu, H.G.; Liu, X.; Yang, W.D.; Ye, L.S.; Shou, Z.X.; Zhang, Q.B. Strata of China 12: Cretaceous; Geological Publishing House: Beijing, China, 1986. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, P. A survey of the non-marine Cretaceous of China. Cretac Res 1983, 4, 123–143. [Google Scholar]
- Zheng, X.L.; Zheng, X.M.; Zheng, X.S.; Li, J.G.; Yang, Y.M.; Weng, Y.X.; Wu, C.X. The late Cretaceous ostracod fossils of the Junggar Basin (in Chinese). J Stratigr 2013, 37, 206–209. [Google Scholar]
- Xi, D.; Wan, X.; Li, G.; Li, G. Cretaceous integrative stratigraphy and timescale of China. Sci China Earth Sci 2019, 62, 256–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woodward, A.S. On some fish-remains from the Lameta Beds at Dongargaon, Central Provinces. Palaeont Ind 1908, 3, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Prasad, G.V. Vertebrate biodiversity of the Deccan volcanic province of India: A review. BSGF - Earth Sci. Bull. 2012, 183, 597–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarkar, A.; Bhattacharya, S.K.; Mohabey, D.M. Stable isotope analyses of dinosaur eggshells: Paleoenvironmental implications: Geology 1991, 19, 1068–1107.
- Ghosh, P.; Bhattacharya, S.K.; Jani, R.A. Paleoclimate and paleovegetation in Central India during the Upper Cretaceous based on the stable isotope composition of the paleosol carbonates. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 1995, 114, 285–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tandon, S.K.; Sood, A.; Andrews, J.E.; Dennis, P.F. Paleoenvironments of dinosaur-bearing Lameta Beds (Maastrichtian), Narmada Valley, Central India. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 1995, 117, 153–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohabey, D.M. Pycnodus lametae (Pycnodontidae), a holostean fish from freshwater Upper Cretaceous Lameta Formation of Maharashtra. J Geol Soc India 1996, 47, 593–598. [Google Scholar]
- Mohabey, D.M.; Udhoji, S.G. Fauna and flora from Late Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) non-marine Lameta sediments associated with Deccan volcanic episode, Maharashtra: its relevance to the K-T boundary problem, palaeoenvironment and palaeogeography. Gondwana Geol Mag 1996, 2, 349–364. [Google Scholar]
- Jain, S.L.; Sahni, A. Some Upper Cretaceous vertebrates from central India and their palaeogeographical implications. In Symposium on Cretaceous of India: palaeoecology, palaeogeography and time boundaries, Lucknow, India, 24–26 November; Maheshwari, H.K., Ed.; Indian Association Palynostratigraphers: Lucknow, India, 1983. [Google Scholar]
- Sahni, A. Cretaceous-Paleocene Terrestrial Faunas of India: Lack of Endemism During Drifting of the Indian Plate. Science 1984, 226, 441–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shome, S.; Chandel, R.S. Palaeontological studies of Papro Formation (Infratrappean) of Lalitpur District, Uttar Pradesh-Its age, correlation and palaeoecology. Indian J Geosci 2013, 65, 49–62. [Google Scholar]
- Khosla, A. Dinosaur eggshells from the Late Cretaceous Lameta Formation along the east-central Narbada River region: Biomineralization and morphotaxonomical studies. Unpublished. PhD Thesis, Panjab University, Chandigarh, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Khosla, A.; Sahni, A. Late cretaceous (Maastrichtian) ostracodes from the Lameta formation, Jabalpur cantonment area, Madhya Pradesh, India. J Palaeontol Soc India 2000, 45, 57–78. [Google Scholar]
- Khosla, A.; Prasad, G.V.R.; Verma, O.; Jain, A.K.; Sahni, A. Discovery of a micromammal-yielding Deccan intertrappean site near Kisalpuri, Dindori District, Madhya Pradesh. Curr Sci 2004, 87, 380–383. [Google Scholar]
- Prasad, G.V.R.; Khajuria, C.K. Palaeoenvironments of the Late Cretaceous Mammal-Bearing Intertrappean Beds of Naskal, Andhra Pradesh, India. Mem Geol Soc India 1996, 37, 337–362. [Google Scholar]
- Khajuria, C.; Prasad, G. Taphonomy of a late Cretaceous mammal-bearing microvertebrate assemblage from the Deccan inter-trappean beds of Naskal, peninsular India. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclim. Palaeoecol. 1998, 137, 153–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prasad, G.V.R.; Khajuria, C.K. A record of microvertebrate fauna from the intertrappean beds of Naskal, Andhra Pradesh. J Palaeontol Soc India 1990, 35, 151–161. [Google Scholar]
- Rana, R.S. Palaeontology and Palaeoecology of the Intertrappean (Cretaceous–Tertiary transition) beds of the Peninsular India. J Palaeontol Soc India 1990, 35, 105–120. [Google Scholar]
- Prasad, G.V.R.; Sahni, A. Coastal-plain microvertebrate assemblage from the terminal Cretaceous of Asifabad, Peninsular India. J Palaeontol Soc India 1987, 32, 5–19. [Google Scholar]
- Lourembam, R.S.; Prasad, G.V.R.; Grover, P. Ichthyofauna (Chondrichthyes, Osteichthyes) from the Upper Cretaceous intertrappean beds of Piplanarayanwar, Chhindwara District, Madhya Pradesh, India. Isl. Arc 2017, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahni, A. Upper Cretaceous palaeobiogeography of peninsular India and e Cretaceous-Paleocene transition: the vertebrate evidence. In Symposium on Cretaceous of India: palaeoecology, palaeogeography and time boundaries, Lucknow, India, 24–26 November; Maheshwari, H.K., Ed.; Indian Association Palynostratigraphers: Lucknow, India, 1983. [Google Scholar]
- Keller, G.; Adatte, T.; Bajpai, S.; Mohabey, D.; Widdowson, M.; Khosla, A.; Sharma, R.; Khosla, S.; Gertsch, B.; Fleitmann, D.; et al. K–T transition in Deccan Traps of central India marks major marine Seaway across India. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2009, 282, 10–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rana, R.S.; Kumar, K.; Singh, H. Palaeocene vertebrate fauna from the Fatehgarh Formation of Barmer district, Rajasthan, western India. In Micropalaeontology: Application in Stratigraphy and Paleoceanography; Sinha, D.K., Ed.; Narosa Publishing House: New Delhi, India, 2006; pp. 113–130. [Google Scholar]
- Dolson, J.; Burley, S.D.; Sunder, V.; Kothari, V.; Naidu, B.; Whiteley, N.P.; Farrimond, P.; Taylor, A.; Direen, N.; Ananthakrishnan, B. The discovery of the Barmer Basin, Rajasthan, India, and its petroleum geology. AAPG Bull. 2015, 99, 433–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khosla, A. Palaeoenvironmental, palaeoecological and palaeobiogeographical implications of mixed fresh water and brackish marine assemblages from the Cretaceous-Palaeogene Deccan intertrappean beds at Jhilmili, Chhindwara District, central India. Rev Mex de Cienc Geol 2015, 32, 344–357. [Google Scholar]
- Schultz, O.; Paunović, M. Der Nachweis von Coelodus (Osteichthyes, Pycnodontidae) im Turonien (Oberkreide) von Gams bei Hieflau, Steiermark, Österreich, und aus der Oberkreide von Kroatien und Italien. Ann Naturh Mus Wien, Ser A 1997, 98A, 73–141.
- Arambourg, C.; Joleaud, L. Vertébrés fossiles du Bassin du Niger. Bull Dir Mines Af Occid 1943, 7, 27–74. [Google Scholar]
- Ősi, A.; Szabó, M.; Kollmann, H.; Wagreich, M.; Kalmár, R.; Makádi, L.; Szentesi, Z.; Summesberger, H. Vertebrate remains from the Turonian (Upper Cretaceous) Gosau Group of Gams, Austria. Cretac. Res. 2019, 99, 190–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kollmann, H.A. Megalonoda n. gen.(Melanopsidae, Gastropoda) aus der Oberkreide der Nördlichen Kalkalpen (Österreich). Ann Naturh Mus Wien, Ser A 1984, 86, 55–62. [Google Scholar]
- Kollmann, H.A.; Sachsenhofer, R.F. Zur Genese des Gagats von Gams bei Hieflau (Oberkreide, Steiermark). Mitt Ref Geol Paläont Landesmuseum Joanneum 1998, 2, 223–228. [Google Scholar]
- Neubauer, T.A.; Harzhauser, M.; Mandic, O.; Georgopoulou, E.; Kroh, A. Paleobiogeography and historical biogeography of the non-marine caenogastropod family Melanopsidae. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclim. Palaeoecol. 2016, 444, 124–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kocsis, L.; Ősi, A.; Vennemann, T.; Trueman, C.N.; Palmer, M.R. Geochemical study of vertebrate fossils from the Upper Cretaceous (Santonian) Csehbánya Formation (Hungary): Evidence for a freshwater habitat of mosasaurs and pycnodont fish. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclim. Palaeoecol. 2009, 280, 532–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Botfalvai, G.; Ősi, A.; Mindszenty, A. Taphonomic and paleoecologic investigations of the Late Cretaceous (Santonian) Iharkút vertebrate assemblage (Bakony Mts, northwestern Hungary). Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 2015, 417, 79–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szabó, M.; Gulyás, P.; Ősi, A. Late Cretaceous (Santonian) pycnodontid (Actinopterygii, Pycnodontidae) remains from the freshwater deposits of the Csehbánya Formation, (Iharkút, Bakony Mountains, Hungary). Ann Paleontol 2016, 102, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- si, A.; Rabi, M.; Makádi, L.; Szentesi, Z.; Botfalvai, G.; Gulyás, P. The Late Cretaceous continental vertebrate fauna from Iharkút (western Hungary, Central Europe): a review. In Bernissart Dinosaurs and Early Terrestrial Ecosystems; Godefroit, P., Ed.; Indiana University Press: Bloomington, USA, 2012; pp. 532–569. [Google Scholar]
- Jocha-Edelényi, E. History of evolution of the Upper Cretaceous Basin in the Bakony Mts at the time of the terrestrial Csehbánya Formation. Acta Geol Hung 1988, 31, 19–31. [Google Scholar]
- Ősi, A.; Bodor, E.R.; Makádi, L.; Rabi, M. Vertebrate remains from the Upper Cretaceous (Santonian) Ajka Coal Formation, western Hungary. Cretac. Res. 2016, 57, 228–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Császár, G.H.; Góczán, F.A. Bakony felső-kréta kőszénkutatás és kőszén lápvizsgálatat (Upper Cretaceous coal prospecting and peat bog studies in the Bakony Mts). Magyar Állami Földtani Intézet Évi Jelentése 1988, 1986, 155–178. [Google Scholar]
- Siegl-Farkas, Á. Palynostratigraphy and evolution history of the Ajka Coal Formation, W. Hungary. (Hungarian with English summary). Magyar Állami Öldtani lntéźet Évi Jelentése 1988, 1986, 179–209. [Google Scholar]
- Bodrogi, I.; Fogarasi, A.; Yazikova, E.A.; Sztanó, O.; Báldi-Beke, M. Upper Cretaceous of the Bakony Mts. (Hungary): sedimentology, biostratigraphy, correlation. Zentbl Geol Paläontologie 1998, 1, 1179–1194. [Google Scholar]
- Garcia, G.; Bardet, N.; Houssaye, A.; Pereda-Suberbiola, X.; Valentin, X. Mosasauroid (Squamata) discovery in the Late Cretaceous (Early Campanian) continental deposits of Villeveyrac–L’Olivet, southern France. C R Palevol 2015, 14, 495–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torices, A.; Diaz Berenguer, E.; Narvaéz, I.; Ortega, F.; Perez, S.; Serrano, H. Preliminary analysis of the microvertebrate fossils of“Lo Hueco” (Upper Cretaceous, Cuenca, Spain). In Mésogée-Bulletin du Muséum d’histoire Naturelle de Marseille 66, Proceedings of the 8ème Congrès de l’European Association of Vertebrate Palaeontology (EAVP), Aix-en-Provence, France, 7–12 June 2010; Muséum d’histoire naturelle: Marseille, France, 2010; p. 80. [Google Scholar]
- Torices, A.; Barroso-Barcenilla, F.; Cambra-Moo, O.; Perez, S.; Serrano, H. Vertebrate microfossil analysis in the Palaeontological site of “Lo Hueco” (Upper Cretaceous, Cuenca, Spain). In Abstracts 71st Meeting of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, Las Vegas, USA, 2–5 November 2011; Supplement to the Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology: Las Vegas, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Ortega, F.; Bardet, N.; Barroso-Barcenilla, F.; Callapez, P.M.; Cambra-Moo, O.; Daviero-Gómez, V.; Díez Díaz, V.; Domingo, L.; Elvira, A.; Escaso, F.; García-Oliva, M.; Gómez, B.; Houssaye, A.; Knoll, F.; Marcos-Fernández, F.; Martín, M.; Mocho, P.; Narváez, I.; Pérez-García, A.; Peyrot, D.; Segura, M.; Serrano, H.; Torices, A.; Vidal, D.; Sanz, J.L. The biota of the upper Cretaceous site of Lo Hueco (Cuenca, Spain). J Iber Geol 2015, 41, 83–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marmi, J.; Blanco, A.; Fondevilla, V.; Vecchia, F.M.D.; Sellés, A.G.; Vicente, A.; Martín-Closas, C.; Oms, O.; Galobart. The Molí del Baró-1 site, a diverse fossil assemblage from the uppermost Maastrichtian of the southern Pyrenees (north-eastern Iberia). Cretac. Res. 2016, 57, 519–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blanco, A.; Szabó, M.; Blanco-Lapaz. ; Marmi, J. Late Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) Chondrichthyes and Osteichthyes from northeastern Iberia. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclim. Palaeoecol. 2017, 465, 278–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Díez-Canseco, D.; Arz, J.; Benito, M.; Díaz-Molina, M.; Arenillas, I. Tidal influence in redbeds: A palaeoenvironmental and biochronostratigraphic reconstruction of the Lower Tremp Formation (South-Central Pyrenees, Spain) around the Cretaceous/Paleogene boundary. Sediment. Geol. 2014, 312, 31–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cifelli, R.L.; Nydam, R.L.; Gardner, J.D.; Weil, A.; Eaton, J.G.; Kirkland, J.I.; Madsen, S.K.; Gillette, D.D. Medial Cretaceous vertebrates from the Cedar Mountain Formation, Emery County, Utah: the Mussentuchit local fauna. In Vertebrate paleontology in Utah (MP 99–1); Gillette, D.D., Ed.; Utah Geological Survey: Salt Lake City, USA, 1999; pp. 219–242. [Google Scholar]
- Fiorillo, A.R.; Gillette, D.D. Non-mammalian microvertebrate remains from the Robison Eggshell site, Cedar Mountain Formation (Lower Cretaceous), Emery County. Utah. In Vertebrate paleontology in Utah (MP 99–1); Gillette, D.D., Ed.; Utah Geological Survey: Salt Lake City, USA, 1999; pp. 259–268. [Google Scholar]
- Eaton, J.G.; Kirkland, J.I.; Kauffman, E.G. Evidence and dating of mid-Cretaceous tectonic activity in the San Rafael Swell, Emery County, Utah. Mt Geol 1990, 27, 39–45. [Google Scholar]
- Brinkman, D.B.; Newbrey, M.G.; Neuman, A.G.; Eaton, J.G.; Titus, A.L. Freshwater Osteichthyes from the Cenomanian to late Campanian of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, Utah. In At the Top of the Grand Staircase: The Late Cretaceous of Southern Utah; Titus, A.L., Loewen, M.A., Eds.; Indiana University Press: Bloomington, USA, 2013; pp. 195–236. [Google Scholar]
- Kirkland, J.I.; Eaton, J.G.; Brinkman, D.B. Elasmobranchs from Upper Cretaceous freshwater facies in southern Utah. In At the Top of the Grand Staircase: The Late Cretaceous of Southern Utah; Titus, A.L., Loewen, M.A., Eds.; Indiana University Press: Bloomington, USA, 2013; pp. 153–194. [Google Scholar]
- Titus, A.; Eaton, J.; Sertich, J. Late Cretaceous stratigraphy and vertebrate faunas of the Markagunt, Paunsaugunt, and Kaiparowits plateaus, southern Utah. Geol Intermt West 2016, 3, 229–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pedrão, E.; Arai, M.; Barrilari, I.M.R.; Carvalho, I.S. Análise palinológica de uma amostra de superfície de Querru (Formação Itapecuru), Município de Itapecuru-Mirim – MA. Relatório Técnico Petrobrás, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1993; 11 pp.
- Candeiro, C.R.A.; Fanti, F.; Therrien, F.; Lamanna, M.C. Continental fossil vertebrates from the mid-Cretaceous (Albian–Cenomanian) Alcântara Formation, Brazil, and their relationship with contemporaneous faunas from North Africa. J Afr Earth Sci 2011, 60, 79–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Medeiros, M.A.; Lindoso, R.M.; Mendes, I.D.; De Souza Carvalho, I. The Cretaceous (Cenomanian) continental record of the laje do coringa flagstone (Alcântara formation), northeastern South America. J South Am Earth Sci 2014, 53, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sousa, E.P.; Medeiros, M.A.; Bertini, R.J.; Pereira, A.A.; Toledo, C.E.V. Ocorrência inédita de picnodontiformes para a Laje do Coringa, Ilha do Cajual (Formação Alcântara), Eo-cenomaniano do Estado do Maranhão, Simpósio Brasileiro de Paleontologia de Vertebrados IV, UNESP, Rio Claro, Brazil, -16; 2004; 67–68. 12 July.
- Benedetto, J.L.; Sanchez, T. EI hallazgo de peces Pycnodontiformes (Holostei) en la Formacion Yacoraite (Cretacico superior) de la provincia de Salta (Argentina) y su importancia paleoecologica. Acta Geol Lilloana 1971, 11, 153–175. [Google Scholar]
- Benedetto, J.L.; Sanchez, T. Coelodus toncoensis nov. sp. (Pisces, Holostei, Pycnodontiformes) de la Formacion Yacoraite (Cretacico superior) de la provincia de Salta. Ameghiniana 1972, 9, 59–71. [Google Scholar]
- Cione, A.L. Algunas consideraciones sobre los Pycnodontiformes (Pisces, Holostei) procedentes de la Formacion Yacoraite, Cretacico tardio de la provincia de Salta. Ameghiniana 1977, 14, 315–316. [Google Scholar]
- Gasparini, Z.; Buffetaut, E. Dolichochampsa minima, n. gen., n. sp., a representative of a new family of eusuchian crocodiles from the late Cretaceous of northern Argentina. Neues Jahrb Geol Paläont Mh 1980, 5, 257–271. [Google Scholar]
- Cione, A.L.; Pereira, S.M.; Alonso, R.; Arias, J. Los peces bagres (Osteichthyes, Siluriformes) de la Formación Yacoraite (Cretacico tardio). Consideraciones biogeograficas y bioestratigraficas. Ameghiniana 1985, 21, 294–304. [Google Scholar]
- Marquillas, R.; Sabino, I.; Sial, A.N.; Del Papa, C.; Ferreira, V.; Matthews, S. Carbon and oxygen isotopes of Maastrichtian–Danian shallow marine carbonates: Yacoraite Formation, northwestern Argentina. J South Am Earth Sci 2007, 23, 304–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deschamps, R.; Rohais, S.; Hamon, Y.; Gasparrini, M. Dynamic of a lacustrine sedimentary system during late rifting at the Cretaceous–Palaeocene transition: Example of the Yacoraite Formation, Salta Basin, Argentina. Depos Rec 2020, 6, 490–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arratia, G.; Cione, A. The record of fossil fishes of southern South America. Münchner Geowiss Abh 1996, 30, 9–72. [Google Scholar]
- Gayet, M. Holostean and teleostean fishes of Bolivia. Rev Téc Yaci Petrol Fisc Bol 1991, 12, 453–494. [Google Scholar]
- Gayet, M.; Marshall, L.G.; Sempéré, T. The Mesozoic and Paleocene vertebrates of Bolivia and their stratigraphic context: a review. Rev Téc Yaci Petrol Fisc Bol 1991, 12, 393–433. [Google Scholar]
- Gayet, M.; Sempre, T.; Cappetta, H.; Jaillard, E.; Lévy, A. La présence de fossiles marins dans le Crétacé terminal des Andes centrales et ses conséquences paléogéographiques. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 1993, 102, 283–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gayet, M.; Marshall, L.G.; Sempere, T.; Meunier, F.J.; Cappetta, H.; Rage, J.-C. Middle Maastrichtian vertebrates (fishes, amphibians, dinosaurs and other reptiles, mammals) from Pajcha Pata (Bolivia). Biostratigraphic, palaeoecologic and palaeobiogeographic implications. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclim. Palaeoecol. 2001, 169, 39–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schultze, H.P. Pycnodont fish (Actinopterygii, Osteichthyes) from the El Molino Formation (Late Cretaceous to Early Paleocene) of Bolivia. Rev Téc Yaci Petrol Fisc Bol 1991, 12, 449–452. [Google Scholar]
- de Muizon, C.; Gayet, M.; Lavenu, A.; Marshall, L.G.; Sigé, B.; Villaroel, C. Late Cretaceous vertebrates, including mammals,from Tiupampa, Southcentral Bolivia. Geobios 1983, 16, 747–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benyoucef, M.; Läng, E.; Cavin, L.; Mebarki, K.; Adaci, M.; Bensalah, M. Overabundance of piscivorous dinosaurs (Theropoda: Spinosauridae) in the mid-Cretaceous of North Africa: The Algerian dilemma. Cretac. Res. 2015, 55, 44–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Longbottom, A.E. New Tertiary pycnodonts from the Tilemsi valley, Republic of Mali. Bull br Mus Nat Hist 1984, 38, 1–26. [Google Scholar]
- O'Leary, M.A.; Bouaré, M.L.; Claeson, K.M.; Heilbronn, K.; Hill, R.V.; Mccartney, J.; Sessa, J.A.; Sissoko, F.; Tapanila, L.; Wheeler, E.; et al. Stratigraphy and Paleobiology of the Upper Cretaceous-Lower Paleogene Sediments from the Trans-Saharan Seaway in Mali. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 2019, 2019, 1–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tapanila, L.; Roberts, E.; Bouaré, M.L.; Sissoko, F.; O’Leary, M.A. Phosphate taxonomy of bone and comprolite conglomerates: a case study from the Eocene of Mali, NW Africa. Palaios 2008, 23, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ostrowski, S.A. The teleost ichthyofauna from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar: Systematics, distribution, and implications for Gondwanan biogeography. Unpublished PhD thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing, 2012.
- Rogers, R.R.; Hartman, J.H.; Krause, D.W. Stratigraphic Analysis of Upper Cretaceous Rocks in the Mahajanga Basin, Northwestern Madagascar: Implications for Ancient and Modern Faunas. J. Geol. 2000, 108, 275–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rogers, R.R. Fine-grained debris flows and extraordinary vertebrate burials in the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar. Geology 2005, 33, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krause, D.W.; Sertich, J.J.W.; Rogers, R.R.; Kast, S.C.; Rasoamiaramanana, A.H.; Buckley, G.A. Overview of the discovery, distribution, and geological context of Simosuchus clarki (Crocodyliformes: Notosuchia) from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar. J. Vertebr. Paléontol. 2010, 30, 4–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fendley, I.M.; Sprain, C.J.; Renne, P.R.; Arenillas, I.; Arz, J.A.; Gilabert, V.; Self, S.; Vanderkluysen, L.; Pande, K.; Smit, J.; Mittal, T. No Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary in exposed Rajahmundry Traps: A refined chronology of the longest Deccan lava flows from 40Ar/39Ar dates, magnetostratigraphy, and biostratigraphy. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 2020, 21, e2020GC009149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhalla, S.N. On the occurrence of Eotrigonodon in the Eocene of Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh. J Geol Soc India 1974, 15, 335–337. [Google Scholar]
- Prasad, G.V.R. Fossil fish remains from the intertrappean beds of Duddukuru, Andhra Pradesh. Bull Indian Geol Assoc 1987, 20, 33–39. [Google Scholar]
- Keller, G.; Adatte, T.; Gardin, S.; Bartolini, A.; Bajpai, S. Main Deccan volcanism phase ends near the K-T boundary: Evidence from the Krishna-Godavari Basin, SE India. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2008, 268, 293–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ebersole, J.A.; Cicimurri, D.J.; Stringer, G.L. Taxonomy and biostratigraphy of the elasmobranchs and bonyfishes (Chondrichthyes and Osteichthyes) of the lower-to-middle Eocene (Ypresian to Bartonian) Claiborne Group in Alabama, USA,including an analysis of otoliths. Euro J Taxon 2019, 585, 1–274. [Google Scholar]
- Holman, J.A.; Case, G.R. Reptiles from the Eocene Tallahatta Formation of Alabama. J Vertebr Paleontol 1988, 8, 328–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marquillas, R.A.; Del Papa, C.E.; Sabino, I.F. Sedimentary aspects and paleoenvironmental evolution of a rift basin: Salta Group (Cretaceous-Paleogene), northwestern Argentina. Int J Earth Sci 2005, 54, 94–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guinot, G.; Cavin, L. Body size evolution and habitat colonization across 100 million years (Late Jurassic–Paleocene) of the actinopterygian evolutionary history. Fish Fish. 2018, 19, 577–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Föllmi, K. Early Cretaceous life, climate and anoxia. Cretac. Res. 2011, 35, 230–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lovejoy, N.R.; Albert, J.S.; Crampton, W.G. Miocene marine incursions and marine/freshwater transitions: Evidence from Neotropical fishes. J. South Am. Earth Sci. 2006, 21, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kauffman, E.G. Paleobiogeography and evolutionary response dynamic in the Cretaceous Western Interior seaway of North America. In Jurassic–Cretaceous Biochronology and Paleogeography of North America; Westermann, G.E.G., Ed.; Geological Assocation of Canada: St. John’s, Canada, 1984; pp. 275–306. [Google Scholar]
- nbsp; Wang, C. S.; Scott, R.W.; Wan, X.Q.; Graham, S.A.; Huang, Y.J.; Wang, P.J.; Wu, H.C.; Dean, W.E.; Zhang, L.M. Late Cretaceous climate changes recorded in Eastern Asian lacustrine deposits and North American Epieric sea strata. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2013, 126, 275–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grande, L.; Bemis, W.E. A comprehensive phylogenetic study of Amiid fishes (Amiidae) based on comparative skeleta anatomy. An empirical search for interconnected patterns of natural history. J Vertebr Palaeontol 1998, 18, 1–696. [Google Scholar]
- Clement, A.M.; Long, J.A. Air-breathing adaptation in a marine Devonian lungfish. Biol. Lett. 2010, 6, 509–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Betancur-R, R.; Ortí, G.; Pyron, R.A. Fossil-based comparative analyses reveal ancient marine ancestry erased by extinction in ray-finned fishes. Ecol. Lett. 2015, 18, 441–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guinot, G.; Cavin, L. Contrasting ‘fish’ diversity dynamics between marine and freshwater environments. Curr Biol 2015, 25, 2314–2318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheehan, P.M.; Fastovsky, D.E. Major extinctions of land-dwelling vertebrates at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary, eastern Montana. Geology 1992, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cavin, L.; Martin, M. Les actinopterygiens et la limite Cretace-Tertiaire. Geobios 1995, 28, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cavin, L. Effects of the Cretaceous-Tertiary event on bony fishes. In Geological and Biological Effects of Impact Events; Buffetaut, E., Koeberl, C., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 2002; pp. 141–158. [Google Scholar]
- D'Hondt, S.; Donaghay, P.; Zachos, J.C.; Luttenberg, D.; Lindinger, M. Organic Carbon Fluxes and Ecological Recovery from the Cretaceous-Tertiary Mass Extinction. Science 1998, 282, 276–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bartholomai, A. The large aspidorhynchid fish, Richmondichthys sweeti (Etheridge Jnr and Smith Woodward, 1891) from Albian marine deposits of Queensland, Australia. Mem Queensl Mus 2004, 49, 521–536. [Google Scholar]
- Bloom, D.D.; Weir, J.T.; Piller, K.R.; Lovejoy, N.R. Do freshwater fishes diversify faster than marine fishes? A test using state-dependent diversification analyses and molecular phylogenetics of new world silversides (Atherinopsidae). Evolution 2013, 28, 2689–2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Santini, F.; Nguyen, M.T.T.; Sorenson, L.; Waltzek, T.B.; Alfaro, J.W.L.; Eastman, J.M.; Alfaro, M.E. Do habitat shifts drive diversification in teleost fishes? An example from the pufferfishes (Tetraodontidae). J. Evol. Biol. 2013, 26, 1003–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bloom, D.D.; Lovejoy, N.R. On the origins of marine-derived freshwater fishes in South America. J. Biogeogr. 2017, 44, 1927–1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scotese, C.R. Atlas of Jurassic Paleogeographic Maps, PALEOMAP Atlas for ArcGIS, Maps 32–42, Vol. 4, The Jurassic and Triassic,, Mollweide Projection; PALEOMAP Project: Evanston, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- cotese, C.R. Atlas of Early Cretaceous Paleogeographic Maps, PALEOMAP Atlas for ArcGIS, Maps 23–31, Vol. 2, The Cretaceous, Mollweide Projection; PALEOMAP Project: Evanston, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Scotese, C.R. Atlas of Late Cretaceous Maps, PALEOMAP Atlas for ArcGIS, Maps 16–22 Vol. 2, The Cretaceous, Mollweide Projection; PALEOMAP Project, Evanston, USA, 2014; 13 pp.
- Scotese, C.R. Atlas of Paleogene Paleogeographic Maps, PALEOMAP Atlas for ArcGIS, Maps 8-15, Vol. 1, The Cenozoic, Mollweide Projection; PALEOMAP Project, Evanston, USA, 2014; 12 pp.
Figure 1.
Holotype of Ocloedus subdiscus (MNHN MSE 301G) from the Early Cretaceous (Berriasian-Valanginian) El Montsec, Spain. This species represents one of the few articulated specimens of a pycnodont from a freshwater environment. Collection abbreviations: MNHN - Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris Scale bar is 1 cm.
Figure 1.
Holotype of Ocloedus subdiscus (MNHN MSE 301G) from the Early Cretaceous (Berriasian-Valanginian) El Montsec, Spain. This species represents one of the few articulated specimens of a pycnodont from a freshwater environment. Collection abbreviations: MNHN - Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris Scale bar is 1 cm.
Figure 2.
Examples of jaw fragments of pycnodont taxa from nonmarine localities. (A) cf. Coelodus sp. (MTM V 2010.139.1), modified from [200] Szabo et al. 2016. (B) Pycnodontiformes incertae sedis (UFRJ-DG 423-PD), modified from [151]. (C) Agassizilia erfoudina (FSAC-KK 5073), modified from [47]. (D) Neoproscinetes africanus (FSAC-KK 5070), modified from [47]. (E) Turbomesodon cf. arcuatus (NHM PV P.45763), modified from [29]. Collection abbreviations: FSAC - Faculté des Sciences Aïn Chock; MTM - Hungarian Natural History Museum (Magyar Természettudományi Múzeum); NHM - Natural History Museum, London; UFRJ - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Scale bar for A, C, D and E is 10 mm. Scale bar for B is 5 mm.
Figure 2.
Examples of jaw fragments of pycnodont taxa from nonmarine localities. (A) cf. Coelodus sp. (MTM V 2010.139.1), modified from [200] Szabo et al. 2016. (B) Pycnodontiformes incertae sedis (UFRJ-DG 423-PD), modified from [151]. (C) Agassizilia erfoudina (FSAC-KK 5073), modified from [47]. (D) Neoproscinetes africanus (FSAC-KK 5070), modified from [47]. (E) Turbomesodon cf. arcuatus (NHM PV P.45763), modified from [29]. Collection abbreviations: FSAC - Faculté des Sciences Aïn Chock; MTM - Hungarian Natural History Museum (Magyar Természettudományi Múzeum); NHM - Natural History Museum, London; UFRJ - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Scale bar for A, C, D and E is 10 mm. Scale bar for B is 5 mm.
Figure 3.
Palaeobiogeographic distribution of non-marine pycnodonts through time. Numbered stars refer primarily to geological age. When geological age is unclear, the star will represent the locality the fossil was collected from as well as the currently time span that the locality is believed to represent. All cited localities and localities referring to a particular stage are discussed in further detail within the main text. Maps modified from Scotese [227, 228, 229, 230 2014a, b, c, d]. (A) Late Jurassic, Oxfordian, 158.4 Ma: 1. Changtu, Tibet, Late Jurassic; 2. Khlong Min Formation, Thailand, Mid-Late Jurassic; 3. Morrison Formation, USA, Oxfordian-Tithonian; 4. Mugher Mudstone, Ethiopia, ?Kimmeridgian-Tithonian; 5. Stanleyville Formation, Democratic Republic of Congo, Kimmeridgian-Valanginian. (B) Early Cretaceous, early Aptian, 121.8 Ma: 1. Berriasian; 2. Iberian Basin, eastern Spain, Berriasian-Valanginian, Barremian-Albian; 3. Southern England, Berriasian-Valanginian, Hauterivian-Barremian; 4. Valanginian 5. Phu Phan Thong, Thailand, Hauterivian-Barremian; 6. Vega de Pas Formation, northern Spain, Hauterivian-Barremian; 7. Bernissart, Belgium, Barremian-Aptian; 8. Paluxy Formation, northern Texas, USA, Albian-Aptian; 9. Aptian; 10. Albian; 11. Kem Kem, Albian-Cenomanian. (C) Late Cretaceous, Maastrichtian, 68 Ma: 1. Cenomanian; 2. Turonian; 3. Southern Utah, USA, Turonian-Campanian; 4. Donggou Formation, China, Coniacian-Campanian; 5. Santonian; 6. Campanian; 7. Lo Hueco (Cuenca), Spain, Campanian-Maastrichtian; 8. Maastrichtian; 9. Jhilmili, India, Maastrichtian-Danian; 10. Rajasthan, India, Maastrichtian-Selandian. (D) Palaeogene, Ypresian, 52.2 Ma: 1. Danian; 2. Teberemt and Tamaguélelt Formations, Mali, Selandian-Ypresian; 3. Lutetian.
Figure 3.
Palaeobiogeographic distribution of non-marine pycnodonts through time. Numbered stars refer primarily to geological age. When geological age is unclear, the star will represent the locality the fossil was collected from as well as the currently time span that the locality is believed to represent. All cited localities and localities referring to a particular stage are discussed in further detail within the main text. Maps modified from Scotese [227, 228, 229, 230 2014a, b, c, d]. (A) Late Jurassic, Oxfordian, 158.4 Ma: 1. Changtu, Tibet, Late Jurassic; 2. Khlong Min Formation, Thailand, Mid-Late Jurassic; 3. Morrison Formation, USA, Oxfordian-Tithonian; 4. Mugher Mudstone, Ethiopia, ?Kimmeridgian-Tithonian; 5. Stanleyville Formation, Democratic Republic of Congo, Kimmeridgian-Valanginian. (B) Early Cretaceous, early Aptian, 121.8 Ma: 1. Berriasian; 2. Iberian Basin, eastern Spain, Berriasian-Valanginian, Barremian-Albian; 3. Southern England, Berriasian-Valanginian, Hauterivian-Barremian; 4. Valanginian 5. Phu Phan Thong, Thailand, Hauterivian-Barremian; 6. Vega de Pas Formation, northern Spain, Hauterivian-Barremian; 7. Bernissart, Belgium, Barremian-Aptian; 8. Paluxy Formation, northern Texas, USA, Albian-Aptian; 9. Aptian; 10. Albian; 11. Kem Kem, Albian-Cenomanian. (C) Late Cretaceous, Maastrichtian, 68 Ma: 1. Cenomanian; 2. Turonian; 3. Southern Utah, USA, Turonian-Campanian; 4. Donggou Formation, China, Coniacian-Campanian; 5. Santonian; 6. Campanian; 7. Lo Hueco (Cuenca), Spain, Campanian-Maastrichtian; 8. Maastrichtian; 9. Jhilmili, India, Maastrichtian-Danian; 10. Rajasthan, India, Maastrichtian-Selandian. (D) Palaeogene, Ypresian, 52.2 Ma: 1. Danian; 2. Teberemt and Tamaguélelt Formations, Mali, Selandian-Ypresian; 3. Lutetian.
Figure 4.
Relative number of non-marine pycnodont occurrences from each geological stage of the (A) Early and (B) Late Cretaceous. Numbers in parentheses represent total number of occurrences. Occurrences used to represent pycnodont presence as fossil material typically too fragmented to assign genera/species.
Figure 4.
Relative number of non-marine pycnodont occurrences from each geological stage of the (A) Early and (B) Late Cretaceous. Numbers in parentheses represent total number of occurrences. Occurrences used to represent pycnodont presence as fossil material typically too fragmented to assign genera/species.
Table 1.
Non-marine pycnodont occurrences and diversity through time. Localities with uncertain stratigraphic age included.
Table 1.
Non-marine pycnodont occurrences and diversity through time. Localities with uncertain stratigraphic age included.
| Time Bin | Nonmarine occurrences | No. of known genera |
|---|---|---|
| Late Jurassic | 4 | 3 |
| Early Cretaceous | 61 | 15 |
| Late Cretaceous | 50 | 8 |
| Palaeocene | 9 | 2 |
| Eocene | 5 | 1 |
Table 2.
Non-marine pycnodont occurrences and diversity through time. Specimens from localities with known stratigraphic ages only included.
Table 2.
Non-marine pycnodont occurrences and diversity through time. Specimens from localities with known stratigraphic ages only included.
| Time Bin | Nonmarine occurrences | No. of known genera |
|---|---|---|
| Late Jurassic | 3 | 1 |
| Early Cretaceous | 60 | 14 |
| Late Cretaceous | 45 | 5 |
| Palaeocene | 7 | 2 |
| Eocene | 5 | 1 |
Table 3.
Nonmarine pycnodont occurrences during each stage in the Cretaceous in total numbers of occurrences and in relation to total non-marine pycnodontiform occurrences throughout the Cretaceous.
Table 3.
Nonmarine pycnodont occurrences during each stage in the Cretaceous in total numbers of occurrences and in relation to total non-marine pycnodontiform occurrences throughout the Cretaceous.
| Stage | Nonmarine occurrences | % of Cretaceous nonmarine occurrences |
|---|---|---|
|
19 | 17.3 |
|
2 | 1.8 |
|
2 | 1.8 |
|
3 | 2.7 |
|
1 | 0.9 |
|
13 | 11.8 |
|
1 | 0.9 |
|
8 | 7.3 |
|
11 | 10.0 |
|
5 | 4.5 |
|
5 | 4.5 |
|
2 | 1.8 |
|
1 | 0.9 |
|
1 | 0.9 |
|
3 | 2.7 |
|
3 | 2.7 |
|
1 | 0.9 |
|
29 | 26.4 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Downloads
78
Views
50
Comments
0
Subscription
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated