Preprint Review Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Global Resources and Resource Justice – Lost in Frameworks and the Way Forward

Version 1 : Received: 13 March 2024 / Approved: 13 March 2024 / Online: 14 March 2024 (10:51:28 CET)

How to cite: NEGRUTIU, I. Global Resources and Resource Justice – Lost in Frameworks and the Way Forward. Preprints 2024, 2024030798. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202403.0798.v1 NEGRUTIU, I. Global Resources and Resource Justice – Lost in Frameworks and the Way Forward. Preprints 2024, 2024030798. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202403.0798.v1

Abstract

The lexical analysis of seminal policy-to-diplomacy documents from the socio-environmental discourse of the last fifty year agendas allowed examining the evolution of five themes: resources/waste, pollution, social and economic development, justice, and health. Contextual affinities were strongest between resources, pollution, and health and are linked to societal trends and pressures. On those grounds, the central role of resource stewardship according to nature’s physical limits is highlighted, and dedicated concepts, analytical frameworks, and methodologies with different degrees of sustainability are analyzed. To reframe the identified social and economic problems, the work proposes criteria and choices that (1) allow to compare the dynamics of socioecological states across the planet, (2) help matching the pace of socioecological change by addressing path dependencies through participation and engagement of communities, and (3) enable stakeholders to make trade-offs and take decisions in specific social, economic, political, and cultural contexts. The prioritization of resource justice and responsibility becomes a societal project : from Wellfare State to commonfare communities.

Keywords

Access and (re)allocarion; Data systems; Carrying capacity; Earth4All; Ecological civilization; One Health; Planetary Boundaries; Planetary Health; Quality of Life; Societal Boundaries; Socioecological agendas.

Subject

Environmental and Earth Sciences, Environmental Science

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.