Li, W., Liu, Y., Deng, K., & Wu, X. (2024). POS‐HC: A Part‐of‐Speech Hierarchical Clustering Approach for Normative Texts Partition. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202402.1575.v1
Chicago/Turabian Style
Li, W., Keqing Deng and Xiao-kun Wu. 2024 "POS‐HC: A Part‐of‐Speech Hierarchical Clustering Approach for Normative Texts Partition" Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202402.1575.v1
Abstract
Chinese texts often feature a substantial volume of normative content, and their analysis has increasingly become a focal point in recent semantic analysis endeavors. Enhancing the effectiveness of text classification and clustering is pivotal in unveiling the intricate semantics within extensive textual data. Empirical research within the realm of computational social science has underscored the need for improved explanatory power when it comes to general text clustering methods applied to normative texts. This study introduces an innovative hierarchical clustering method that incorporates part-of-speech (POS) features and pioneers a novel semantic network model. It achieves this by amalgamating a POS-based feature weight calculation method with hierarchical clustering techniques. To assess its efficacy, the method is rigorously evaluated across three diverse text datasets, encompassing normative reports, news articles, and social media content. The experimental results unequivocally demonstrate the superior performance of the POS-HC method, surpassing the traditional TF and TF-IDF feature extraction methods in terms of clustering accuracy, and surpassing some existing clustering methods. Furthermore, its classification effectiveness exhibits notable advantages, particularly in the semantic classification of normative texts.
Computer Science and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
