Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Integrated Performance of a Modular Biomass Boiler with a Combined Heat and Power Industrial Rankine Cycle and Supplementary sCO2 Brayton Cycle

Version 1 : Received: 13 February 2024 / Approved: 15 February 2024 / Online: 15 February 2024 (07:40:42 CET)

How to cite: Haffejee, R.A.; Rousseau, P.; Laubscher, R. Integrated Performance of a Modular Biomass Boiler with a Combined Heat and Power Industrial Rankine Cycle and Supplementary sCO2 Brayton Cycle. Preprints 2024, 2024020832. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202402.0832.v1 Haffejee, R.A.; Rousseau, P.; Laubscher, R. Integrated Performance of a Modular Biomass Boiler with a Combined Heat and Power Industrial Rankine Cycle and Supplementary sCO2 Brayton Cycle. Preprints 2024, 2024020832. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202402.0832.v1

Abstract

In this paper, the integrated performance of a modular biomass boiler with an existing industrial Rankine steam heat and power cycle and a supplementary supercritical-CO2 (sCO2) Brayton cycle is analyzed. The aim is to leverage the high efficiency supplementary sCO2 cycle to increase net generation and energy efficiency from the existing biomass boiler. Two sCO2 heater configurations situated within the flue gas flow path are investigated, namely a single convective-dominant heater, and a dual heater configuration with a radiative and a convective heater. A quasi-steady-state 1D model was developed to simulate the integrated cycle, including detailed component characteristics for the Rankine and Brayton cycles. The model solves the mass, energy, momentum, and species balance equations. The system is analyzed for three cases: (i) the existing Rankine cycle without the sCO2 integration, (ii) with the single convective-dominant sCO2 heater configuration, and (iii) the dual sCO2 heater configuration. The results show the required rate of overfiring for the sCO2 configurations, with a 15.3% increase in fuel flowrate resulting in an additional 21.2% in net power output. The model quantifies the impact of the sCO2 heaters, with reduced heat uptakes for downstream boiler heat exchangers. Furnace water wall heat uptake increased due to overfiring, offsetting the reduced heat uptakes at downstream evaporative heat exchangers. The dual configuration has more impact on Rankine cycle operation due to the radiative sCO2 heater placement in front of the second superheater, absorbing some of the direct radiation from the furnace.

Keywords

biomass; supercritical-CO2; thermofluid process modelling; heat transfer

Subject

Engineering, Mechanical Engineering

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.